DOCSLIB.ORG

Comments Opposing Scott Pruitt's Rollback of the Clean Power Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comments Opposing Scott Pruitt's Rollback of the Clean Power Plan Comments Opposing Scott Pruitt’s Rollback of the Clean Power Plan October 2017 – February 2018 Governors, Attorneys General, and Other State Officials Ted Thomas, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission, NYTimes “Even if they repeal the Clean Power Plan, or replace it with something that doesn’t require us to do very much, you still have to reckon with the fact that ultimately regulations on carbon are coming. So we need to develop options to deal with that other than sticking our heads in the sand and hoping we can just file lawsuits forever. You can either be prepared or unprepared, and that’s a pretty simple choice.” Jerry Brown, Governor of California, Press Release “Scrapping the Clean Power Plan ignores sound science and the extreme cost of climate change. California will, in fact, exceed the goals of the Clean Power Plan. We will push ahead and work with states that share our belief in science and the imperative to combat global warming.” Xavier Becerra, California Attorney General, Press Release “EPA has a legal responsibility to significantly reduce carbon pollution from power plants. This responsibility can only be fulfilled through a strong, effective, and science-based policy like the Clean Power Plan. Repealing it simply won’t cut it. That is why I will do everything in my power to defend the Clean Power Plan.” John Hickenlooper, Governor of Colorado, NYTimes (see also his statement) “We have dramatically cleaner air and we are saving money. My question to the EPA would be, ‘Which part of that don’t you like?’” Brian Sandoval, Governor of Nevada, Statement “Nevada was well on its way to exceeding the expectations outlined in the Clean Power Plan prior to its inception and will remain on that path. Today’s announcement will not change the state’s approach to ensuring our energy future includes abundant clean and renewable energy choices for Nevada consumers.” Dan Malloy, Governor of Connecticut, Statement “This announcement is another disappointing policy reversal that will harm Americans. The Trump administration continues to ignore the clear and indisputable scientific fact that humans are responsible for climate change and that the ever increasing severe weather we experience is a direct result. If the federal government refuses to act in the best interest of the people of this nation, then it is incumbent upon state and local leaders to act and work to reverse the harm human activity has done to our planet. Connecticut is a leader in addressing global warming and resiliency by increasing deployment of green energy technologies and promoting energy efficiency. Irrespective of what nonsensical energy and environmental policies come out of Washington, our state will hold firm in its commitment to a clean and protected environment.” George Jepsen, Connecticut Attorney General, Press Release "While not unexpected, the EPA administrator's action today is disappointing nonetheless. EPA has a responsibility under the law – a responsibility affirmed by our country's highest court – to regulate carbon emissions. Because the Trump Administration's EPA has clearly demonstrated that it has no interest in doing its job when it comes to carbon emissions, Connecticut will join with colleagues in other states in action to defend the Clean Power Plan and protect the health, safety and well-being of our residents." Maura Healey, Massachusetts Attorney General, Washington Post “Along with our partners, Massachusetts fought for years to put this rule in place, and we will be suing to protect the Clean Power Plan from the climate change deniers in this administration who are trying to move us backwards” Mark Dayton, Governor of Minnesota, Statement “The Trump Administration’s constant assault on our environment will not diminish Minnesotans’ resolve to build a vibrant clean energy economy. We will not allow President Trump to stand in the way, as we do everything in our power to reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions that threaten our health and our environment. In the upcoming 2018 Session, I will again urge the Legislature to adopt the ‘50 by 30’ Renewable Energy Standard, which Lt. Governor Smith and legislators from both parties have championed. We must do more to ensure our children and grandchildren inherit a better future, and an even stronger clean energy economy.” Andrew Cuomo, Governor of New York, Statement “The Trump Administration's move to dismantle the Clean Power Plan is a reckless decision that gives power plant operators free reign to do what they will without any concern for our climate. It rolls back the progress we have made to reduce carbon emissions and puts industry interests ahead of our ability to reduce damaging emissions. Climate change is a profound threat to our planet, and it cannot be wished away by denial. There is no denial here in New York. While the Trump Administration takes a back a seat to the rest of the world, New York is on track to meet our ambitious target of achieving 50 percent of electricity from renewables by 2030, and we will continue to lead the fight to meet the standards set forth in both the Paris Accord and the Clean Power Plan.” Eric Schneiderman, New York Attorney General, Press Release “I am proud to lead the coalition of states and localities defending the Clean Power Plan in federal court. If and when the Trump Administration finalizes this repeal, I will sue to protect New Yorkers’ and put a stop to the Trump Administration’s irresponsible and illegal efforts to turn back the clock on public health…The Trump Administration's persistent and indefensible denial of climate change — and their continued assault on actions essential to stemming its increasing devastation — is reprehensible, and I will use every available legal tool to fight their dangerous agenda.” Neil Shader, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection spokesperson, Statement “Governor Wolf and DEP are disappointed in the President’s decision. It ignores science and the country’s global leadership to address climate change. Pennsylvania has made real progress in reducing carbon emissions and DEP will continue to work to find ways to reduce PA’s carbon footprint while ensuring the state remains a net energy exporter.” Kate Brown, Governor of Oregon, Statement "I am deeply disappointed in the repeal of the Clean Power Plan rule. Oregon will not turn its back on the environment or the thousands of jobs that have been created through the clean energy industry. Oregon was the first state in the nation to adopt a coal-to-clean law and will continue to be a leader in clean energy. That’s why we’re stepping up, as the federal government steps down from its leadership role in tackling climate change." Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, Statement “By repealing the Clean Power Plan, President Trump and his EPA administrator are recklessly removing any meaningful, science-based federal restraint on the carbon pollution that power plants are allowed to pump into our atmosphere. Washington State is already feeling the harmful and costly effects of climate change – in more devastating wildfire seasons, strained water resources, increasingly acidic coastal waters, and more. And we are taking action to respond: at my direction, the Washington State Department of Ecology has implemented the nation’s first Clean Air Rule, to limit carbon pollution from our state’s largest sources. We are investing in new clean energy technologies – fueling jobs and business growth in an area with tremendous economic opportunity. We are partnering with other states – through the bipartisan United States Climate Alliance – to fill the void left by the Trump Administration’s total abdication of American leadership. This action by the EPA is a setback in the struggle against climate change, but it will not and cannot stop Washington State and our determined allies in the fight against this existential threat.” Public Health Associations 17 National Health and Medical Organizations, Joint Press Statement “Today’s proposal to revoke the Clean Power Plan is inconsistent with EPA’s core mission of protecting public health and the environment. The Clean Power Plan, adopted in 2015, would have substantially reduced carbon pollution and other emissions from power plants, and prevented an estimated 90,000 pediatric asthma attacks and 3,600 premature deaths each year once fully implemented. Revoking this lifesaving plan denies Americans these health protections and removes crucial tools to reduce pollution that causes climate change.” Paul Billings, Senior VP for Advocacy at the American Lung Association. E&E News "EPA is cooking the books and cherry-picking data to avoid showing the true health costs of air pollution." Katie Huffling, Executive Director, Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments, Press Release “As nurses concerned about the public health impacts resulting from poor air quality and a changing climate, we are deeply disappointed about the decision to repeal the Clean Power Plan. Administrator Pruitt stated that the EPA should not be picking winners and losers, but by his announcement today it is clear that by repealing the Clean Power Plan public health is the loser.” U.S. Senators Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California, Press Release “President Trump’s decision to repeal the Clean Power Plan, announced by President Obama in 2015, ignores the reality happening all around us.” Sen. Kamala Harris, California, Twitter “This decision fails Americans for generations to come.” Sen. Michael Bennett, Colorado, Twitter “Clean Power Plan repeal would be another @POTUS action to roll back protections for America’s children. Wrong priorities.” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut, Twitter “I’ll use every tool at my disposal to protect #CleanPowerPlan and resist the Trump admin's dangerous denial of climate science.” Sen. Tom Carper, Delaware, Press Release “The Clean Power Plan was a historic step to reduce carbon pollution by building on the common sense actions that states, cities, businesses and utilities across the country are already undertaking.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Clean Power Plan: an Enormous Economic Opportunity for Texas
    The Clean Power Plan: An Enormous Economic Opportunity for Texas The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan establishes the nation’s first-ever limits on carbon pollution from existing power plants. The plan sets a carbon emissions reduction goal for each state in order to achieve a national power sector emissions reduction of 32 percent relative to 2005 levels by 2030. Texas’ target is to improve its power sector’s emissions intensity 33 percent relative to 2012 levels by 2030. Although Texas is the #1 carbon polluter in the country, that’s not the whole story. This is: Texas already produces more wind power than any other state. Texas ranks first in the nation for solar energy potential. Texas has greater potential to deploy energy efficiency than any other state. In fact, through current market trends alone, Texas will be 88% of the way toward meeting its 2030 Clean Power Plan target. Amplifying current trends Texas is already moving away from traditional coal generation and toward homegrown, cleaner energy sources, driven by deregulation of the electricity market, the development of the massive highway of transmission lines built to carry West Texas wind to cities throughout the state – the Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ), and technological progress. Plus, this trend toward cleaner, more affordable power – which has coincided with a notable reduction in wholesale electricity prices – should continue. Environmental Defense Fund T 512 478 5161 New York, NY / Austin, TX / Bentonville, AR / Boston, MA / Boulder, CO / Raleigh, NC 301 Congress Ave, Suite 1300 F 512 478 8140 Sacramento, CA / San Francisco, CA / Washington, DC / Beijing, China / La Paz, Mexico Austin, TX 78701 edf.org Totally chlorine free 100% post-consumer recycled paper Benefits for Texans The Clean Power Plan will help Texas lead the world in the race to cleaner, more reliable power technologies, bringing significant benefits for Texas: Jobs Creation: Texas is the nation’s highest producer of natural gas.
    [Show full text]
  • "Implementing EPA's Clean Power Plan: a Menu of Options," NACAA
    Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options May 2015 Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options May 2015 Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options Acknowledgements On behalf of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA), we are pleased to provide Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options. Our association developed this document to help state and local air pollution control agencies identify technologies and policies to reduce greenhouse gases from the power sector. We hope that states and localities, as well as other stakeholders, find this document useful as states prepare their compliance strategies to achieve the carbon dioxide emissions targets set by the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. NACAA would like to thank The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) for its invaluable assistance in developing this document. We particularly thank Rich Sedano, Ken Colburn, John Shenot, Brenda Hausauer, and Camille Kadoch. In addition, we recognize the contribution of many others, including Riley Allen (RAP), Xavier Baldwin (Burbank Water and Power [retired]), Dave Farnsworth (RAP), Bruce Hedman (Institute for Industrial Productivity), Chris James (RAP), Jim Lazar (RAP), Carl Linvill (RAP), Alice Napoleon (Synapse), Rebecca Schultz (independent contractor), Anna Sommer (Sommer Energy), Jim Staudt (Andover Technology Partners), and Kenji Takahashi (Synapse). We would also like to thank those involved in the production of this document, including Patti Casey, Cathy Donohue, and Tim Newcomb (Newcomb Studios). We are grateful to Stu Clark (Washington) and Larry Greene (Sacramento, California), co-chairs of NACAA’s Global Warming Committee, under whose guidance this document was prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • Components of the Clean Power Plan: Setting State Goals to Cut
    COMPONENTS OF THE CLEAN POWER PLAN SETTING STATE GOALS TO CUT CARBON POLLUTION On August 3, President Obama and EPA announced the Clean Power Plan – a historic and important step in reducing carbon pollution from power plants that takes real action on climate change. Shaped by years of unprecedented outreach and public engagement, the final Clean Power Plan is fair, flexible and designed to strengthen the fast‐growing trend toward cleaner and lower‐polluting American energy. With strong but achievable standards for power plants, and customized goals for states to cut the carbon pollution that is driving climate change, the Clean Power Plan provides national consistency, accountability and a level playing field while reflecting each state’s energy mix. It also shows the world that the United States is committed to leading global efforts to address climate change. HOW THE CLEAN POWER PLAN WORKS The Clean Air Act – under section 111(d) – creates a partnership between EPA, states, tribes and U.S. territories – with EPA setting a goal and states and tribes choosing how they will meet it. The final Clean Power Plan follows that approach. EPA is establishing interim and final carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance rates for two subcategories of fossil fuel‐fired electric generating units (EGUs): o Fossil fuel‐fired electric generating units (generally, coal‐ fired power plants) o Natural gas‐fired combined cycle generating units To maximize the range of choices available to states in implementing the standards, and to utilities in meeting them, EPA is establishing interim and final statewide goals in three forms: o A rate‐based state goal measured in pounds per megawatt hour (lb/MWh); o A mass‐based state goal measured in total short tons of CO2; o A mass‐based goal with a new source complement measured in short tons of CO2.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Governments and Mayors As Amici Curiae in Support of the Employees ______Michael N
    Nos. 17-1618, 17-1623, 18-107 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________________ GERALD LYNN BOSTOCK, Petitioner, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, Respondent. __________________ ALTITUDE EXPRESS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. MELISSA ZARDA, et al., Respondents. __________________ R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL HOMES, INC., Petitioners, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent, and AIMEE STEPHENS, Respondent- Intervenor. __________________ On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Eleventh, Second, and Sixth Circuits __________________ BRIEF OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND MAYORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE EMPLOYEES __________________ MICHAEL N. FEUER ZACHARY W. CARTER City Attorney Corporation Counsel JAMES P. CLARK RICHARD DEARING KATHLEEN KENEALY DEVIN SLACK BLITHE SMITH BOCK LORENZO DI SILVIO MICHAEL WALSH DANIEL MATZA-BROWN DANIELLE L. GOLDSTEIN NEW YORK CITY Counsel of Record LAW DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE LOS 100 Church Street ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY New York, NY 10007 200 N. Main Street, 7th Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90012 Counsel for Amici Curiae (213) 978-8100 [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT . 1 ARGUMENT . 2 I. Local Experience Shows That Prohibiting All Forms of Sex-Based Discrimination Benefits the Entire Community. 2 A. Non-discrimination laws and policies enhance amici’s operations. 3 B. Communities nationwide have benefitted from such anti-discrimination protections. 5 II. Workplace Discrimination—Including Sex Discrimination Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People—Harms Local Governments. 7 CONCLUSION. 12 APPENDIX List of Amici . App. 1 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES PAGE CASES Adams v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Village of Biscayne Park 600 NE 114Th St., Biscayne Park, FL 33161 Telephone: 305 899 8000 Facsimile: 305 891 7241
    The Village of Biscayne Park 600 NE 114th St., Biscayne Park, FL 33161 Telephone: 305 899 8000 Facsimile: 305 891 7241 AGENDA REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING Log Cabin - 640 NE 114th Street Biscayne Park, FL 33161 Tuesday, August 06, 2019 7:00 pm In accordance with the provisions of F.S. Section 286.0105, should any person seek to appeal any decision made by the Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made; which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing special accommodation to participate in the proceedings should call Village Hall at (305) 899 8000 no later than four (4) days prior to the proceeding for assistance. DECORUM - All comments must be addressed to the Commission as a body and not to individuals. Any person making impertinent or slanderous remarks, or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Commission, shall be barred from further audience before the Commission by the presiding officer, unless permission to continue or again address the commission is granted by the majority vote of the Commission members present. No clapping, applauding, heckling or verbal outbursts in support or in opposition to a speaker or his/her remarks shall be permitted. No signs or placards shall be allowed in the Commission Chambers. Please mute or turn off your cell phone or pager at the start of the meeting. Failure to do so may result in being barred from the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Comments on EPA's Advance Notice of Proposed
    Community Comments on EPA’s Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0545 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: State Guidelines for Greenhouse Submitted via regulations.gov Gas Emissions from Existing Electric February 26, 2018 Utility Generating Units The undersigned organizations oppose EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt’s ongoing campaign to repeal the Clean Power Plan and leave Americans without any meaningful nation-wide limits on carbon pollution from power plants. Repealing the Clean Power Plan and replacing it with weak limits on power plant carbon pollution—or nothing at all—is a reckless course of action that places the health and safety of millions of Americans at greater risk from climate change and higher levels of deadly air pollution. America’s power plants are our nation’s largest stationary source of the carbon pollution that is changing our climate and posing a dire threat to public health and welfare in the United States and worldwide. Communities and families across the country are already facing the devastating impacts of climate change in the form of more intense hurricanes, rising sea levels, heat waves, wildfires and other extreme weather events. We need to take urgent action to dramatically reduce the pollution that is destabilizing our climate, and it is essential to curb this pollution from the power sector. Deep emission reductions from the nation’s fossil fuel power plants are readily attainable, as shown by the clean energy and energy efficiency progress that is already underway and spurring innovation and job creation across the country. Despite the urgent need for action, Administrator Pruitt has proposed an outright repeal of the Clean Power Plan, one of America’s most important steps to address climate change and the only nation-wide limit on power plant carbon pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Overpeck Short Cv/Biographical Sketch
    JONATHAN OVERPECK SHORT CV/BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION 1979 AB in Geology (Honors), Hamilton College, New York 1981 MSc in Geological Sciences, Brown University, Rhode Island 1985 PhD in Geological Sciences, Brown University, Rhode Island 1985-86 Post-doctoral Research Scientist, Columbia University jointly with the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS (active in BOLD) 2017-present – Samuel A. Graham Dean, School for Environment and Sustainability, Univ. of Michigan 2017-present – William B. Stapp Collegiate Professor of Environmental Education, School for Environment and Sustainability, Univ. of Michigan 2017-present – Professor, Climate and Space Science and Engineering, Univ. of Michigan 2018-present – Professor, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Michigan 2017-present - Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 2016-2017 – Director, Institute of the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson 2016-2017 – Faculty Member, Institute for Energy Solutions, University of Arizona, Tucson 2014-2017 – Regents Professor, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 2014-2015 – Acting Initiative Co-leader, TRIF Water, Environmental and Energy Solutions Program, Univ. of Arizona 2009-2016 – Founding Co-Director, Institute of the Environment, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson 2008-2017 – Faculty, Center for Latin American Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson 2007-2011 – Founding Director, Translational Environmental Research Program (now part of the larger TRIF Water, Environmental and Energy Solutions Program), Univ. of Arizona 2006-present – Affiliated Faculty Member – James E. Rogers College of Law, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson 2004-2017 – Joint Professor, Dept. of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson 1999-2008 – Director, Institute For the Study of Planet Earth, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of EPA's Clean Power Plan on Electricity Generation And
    The Impacts of EPA’s Clean Power Plan on Electricity Generation and Water Use in Texas Paul Faeth November 2014 Unlimited distribution Acknowledgements: Several people supported the effort to complete this analysis. Lars Hanson, in particular, provided significant help interpreting the Clean Power Plan, not only with review of the language, but most helpfully by reproducing EPA’s calculations for Texas so that we could ensure that the methods built into the model were correct. Erin Rebhan helped to develop the structure of the report and also handled the editing. I believe the report is more straightforward and easier to follow as a result of her help. The Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation provided the financial support to undertake the analysis, for which I am grateful. Author: Paul Faeth This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Photography Credit: xuanhuongha - Shutterstock, A.G.A - Shutterstock, pedrosala – Shutterstock, Juergen Faelchle - Shutterstock Approved by: November 2014 Don Cymrot, Vice President of Domestic Research Institute for Public Research Copyright © 2014 CNA Abstract The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a new rule under the Clean Air Act—the Clean Power Plan (CPP)—to control carbon dioxide (CO ) emissions 2 from existing stationary electric power plants. In order to better understand the potential impacts of the rule for water consumption and withdrawals in Texas, a state that is experiencing on-going drought, we apply a power generation policy model to evaluate water use along with other economic and environmental indicators. We explore two scenarios: a Baseline scenario and the implementation of the CPP.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy & Environment Update
    ML Strategies Update ML Strategies, LLC David Leiter, [email protected] 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Sarah Litke, [email protected] Washington, DC 20004 USA Neal Martin, [email protected] 202 434 7300 202 434 7400 fax FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: @MLStrategies www.mlstrategies.com AUGUST 31‚ 2015 Energy & Environment Update ENERGY AND CLIMATE DEBATE Congress returns from the August recess after the Labor Day holiday next week, and the in the meantime, energy and environment issues continue to play a significant role on the national and international stages through the rest of the year. Congress returns September 8 to a packed fall schedule that includes appropriations, the highway bill, reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank, the customs bill, the Iran nuclear deal, cybersecurity legislation, TSCA reform, tax extenders, the debt limit, criminal justice reform, energy legislation, a conference agreement on No Child Left Behind reform, and trade promotion authority. President Obama kicked off a busy fall climate schedule with the August 3 unveiling of the final Clean Power Plan. For recent Clean Power Plan developments, including the status of litigation, please see the Environmental Protection Agency section below. Since then, the president has traveled to Las Vegas, New Orleans, and Alaska to emphasize different aspects of his climate message, and the Obama Administration will continue in the same vein as the end of the year global climate negotiations in Paris near. As climate change increasingly becomes part of President Obama’s legacy, the president keynoted Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-NV) eighth annual National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas August 24 and unveiled a series of new renewable energy efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Case Study
    From the Margins to the Mainstream Lessons from the Clean Power Plan for Alignment, Leadership, and Environmental Justice Ife Kilimanjaro and Antonio Lopez September 2017 From the Margins to the Mainstream Lessons from the Clean Power Plan for Alignment, Leadership, and Environmental Justice Ife Kilimanjaro and Antonio Lopez September 2017 Contents 3 Executive Summary 7 Introduction 11 Methodology 15 Historical Context 15 Waxman-Markey 16 Clean Power Plan Background 19 EJ Equity Advocacy for a Just CPP Rule 19 Concerns and Initial Efforts to Improve the Draft Rule 21 Equity Advocacy to Improve the Draft Rule 25 Equity and Justice in Public Comments 25 Points of Agreement 25 Non-Compliance with EO 12898 26 Omission of Environmental Justice Concerns 26 Strengthen and Incentivize Renewables 27 Points of Difference 27 Market-based Mechanisms 31 Improving the Final Clean Power Plan 32 EJ Impacts: Increased Trainings, Tools and Resources 35 Inroads to Building Alignment 36 Green NGOs Committing to Working Alongside EJ Leaders 39 Strategically Building Grassroots-led Networks 41 Activating Resources from Academic Institutions 42 Building Capacity to Shape Policy in EJ Communities 43 Engaging Funders and Investing Long Term 44 Cross-Sector Strategy Meetings to Discuss Alignment, Action, and Equitable Climate Policy 47 The Road Ahead 50 Timeline 54 Six Points of Alignment 56 Endnotes 61 Acknowledgements FROM THE MARGINS TO THE MAINSTREAM 1 Executive Summary The grassroots work for equity in the Clean Power Plan laid a critical foundation for aligning the environmental movement in an increasingly hostile political landscape. n October 11-12, 2016 the Building Equity and Alignment for Impact “The impact that we’re Initiative (BEA), the Southwest Workers Union (SWU), and Texas most hoping to support OEnvironmental Justice Advocacy Services (TEJAS) hosted a Clean is the building of power Power Plan Forum in Houston, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to the University of Michigan February 12, 2019 Re
    Open Letter to the University of Michigan February 12, 2019 Re: SPG 601.38: “Required Disclosure of Felony Charges and/or Felony Convictions” and Related University of Michigan Policies We, the Carceral State Project at the University of Michigan--along with the undersigned faculty, students, and staff at the University of Michigan, as well as members of the larger community--wish to register our grave concern regarding the University’s recent implementation of a new policy, SPG 601.38.1 This policy requires faculty, staff, student employees, volunteers, and visiting scholars who find ​ themselves convicted of a felony, and even those merely charged but not convicted, to report it to the University. The University of Michigan already requires all prospective undergraduate and graduate students, faculty ​ members, and staff employees to disclose any previous criminal record (both felonies and misdemeanors) during the admissions or employment application process, including, in some cases, information from otherwise sealed juvenile records.2 The University also currently requires prospective employees, ​ ​ including graduate students, to undergo a criminal background check conducted by a private, for-profit company to identify any felony and misdemeanors convictions or pending charges.3 Although the ​ University argues that SPG 601.38 will “better promote safety and security and mitigate potential risk,” this self-disclosure mandate adds a newly punitive element to already invasive and unjust policies that ​ cause far more harm than good.4 Taken together, these policies promote over-criminalization rather than ​ public safety, reinforce the racial and economic inequalities in the criminal justice system and on our campus, and have other devastating collateral consequences.5 ​ The role of the University should be to offer education and employment rather than act as an extension of the carceral state.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Greenhouse Gas Regulation Under Clean Air Act Section 111(D) Need Not, and Should Not, Stop at the Fenceline
    In Defense of the Clean Power Plan: Why Greenhouse Gas Regulation Under Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Need Not, and Should Not, Stop at the Fenceline Eric Anthony DeBellis In the summer of 2014, the Supreme Court heard a challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency’s first-ever Clean Air Act regulation of greenhouse gases from “major” stationary sources like power plants and factories. In Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Court struck down the agency’s special definition of “major” sources for greenhouse gases and removed its broader authority to require permits based solely on greenhouse gas emissions. The Court thus limited the agency’s jurisdiction to sources that already require permits for conventional air pollutants—a category accounting for nearly all emissions the agency sought to regulate. Hence, the case hardly affected the agency’s new permitting program, but the Court’s reasoning raised a concern that may have broader implications. Writing for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia voiced fears of regulatory overreach into the lives of common citizens engaged in innocuous behavior, proclaiming any regulation that could apply to owners of small, nonindustrial sources would face skepticism from the Court. These regulatory overreach concerns may arise again in a legal challenge to the agency’s largest greenhouse gas rule to date: a program to reduce energy sector emissions by 30 percent by 2030 known as the “Clean Power Plan.” After the Court’s decision, many commentators have asked whether the Clean Power Plan’s approach of regulating states’ energy sectors as a whole, including operations that take place “beyond the fenceline” of individual plants, will survive judicial review.
    [Show full text]