DOCSLIB.ORG

Harvard University's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harvard University's A joint project of Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and Harvard Law School Long-Term Legal Strategy Project for Preserving Security and Democratic Freedoms in the War on Terrorism Philip B. Heymann, Harvard Law School Juliette N. Kayyem, Kennedy School of Government Sponsored by The National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government administered the Long-Term Legal Strategy Project from April 2003 - November 2004. The Belfer Center provides leadership in advancing policy-relevant knowledge about the most important challenges of international security and other critical issues where science, technology, environmental policy, and international affairs intersect. To learn more about the Belfer Center, visit www.bcsia.ksg.harvard.edu. Long-Term Legal Strategy Project Attn: Meredith Tunney John F. Kennedy School of Government 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-5275 www.ksg.harvard.edu/bcsia/longtermlegalstrategy www.mipt.org/Long-Term-Legal-Strategy.asp The Long-Term Legal Strategy Project for Preserving Security and Democratic Freedoms in the War on Terrorism at Harvard University Board of Advisors All members of the Board of Advisors agreed with the necessity to evaluate the legal terrain governing the “war on terrorism.” This final Report is presented as a distillation of views and opinions based on a series of closed-door meetings of the Board. The advisors have from time to time been offered the opportunity to express views or make suggestions relating to the matters included in this Report, but have been under no obligation to do so, and the contents of the Report do not represent the specific beliefs of any given member of the Board. The authors of the Long-Term Legal Strategy Report, Philip Heymann and Juliette Kayyem, are responsible for the final analysis herein. Directors Philip B. Heymann, James Barr Ames Professor of Law at the Harvard Law School; former Deputy U.S. Attorney General; former Associate Prosecutor and Consultant to the Watergate Special Force. Juliette N. Kayyem, Acting Executive Director for Research and Adjunct Lecturer at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government; former Member the National Commission on Terrorism; former Legal Adviser to the Attorney General. Advisors Joseph R. (Bob) Barnes, Senior Policy Advisor (Department of Defense), The Nature Conservancy; Brigadier General, U.S. Army (retired). Bob Barr, 21st Century Liberties Chair for Freedom and Privacy, American Conservative Union. Rand Beers, Former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Combating Terrorism; National Security/Homeland Security Issue Coordinator for John Kerry’s Presidential campaign. Michael Chertoff, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; former Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division at the U.S Department of Justice (2001- 2003). Vicki Divoll, Former General Counsel (2001-2003) to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence; former Assistant General Counsel to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Paul Evans, Director, Police Standards Unit, London; former Police Commissioner, Boston Police Department. Neil Gallagher, Homeland Security Executive, Bank of America; former Assistant Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) National Security Division. Mary Graham, Co-Director, Transparency Policy Project, Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government; Visiting Fellow, Brookings Institution. Donald R. Hamilton, Coalition Provisional Authority, Baghdad, Iraq and Deputy Director, National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Eleanor Hill, Partner, King & Spalding, LLP; former Staff Director, House and Senate Intelligence Committees’ Joint Inquiry regarding the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001. Lance Liebman, Director, American Law Institute; William S. Beinecke Professor of Law at Columbia Law School; Director, Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law. John MacGaffin, Former Member, Senior Intelligence Service and former Associate Deputy Director for Operations for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); former Senior Advisor to the Director and Deputy Director for the Federal Bureau for Investigation (FBI). Robert McNamara, Jr., Former General Counsel to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and former Chief Enforcement Attorney for the U.S. Treasury Department. Oliver "Buck" Revell, Founder and President Revell Group International, Inc.; former Special Agent and former Senior Executive to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Suzanne Spaulding, Chair of the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Law and National Security; former Democratic Staff Director for the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in the U.S. House of Representatives. Michael Traynor, Lawyer practicing in San Francisco, California. Michael Vatis, Independent Consultant on Security and Intelligence issues and an Attorney; former Official for the Departments of Defense and Justice and the FBI. Participants from the United Kingdom Experts from the United Kingdom served as observers to the proceedings. Chris Albiston, Consultant to the Director General of the Estonian Police Service in Tallinn; former head of the Police Service of Northern Ireland’s (PSNI) Crime Department; former United Nations Police Commissioner in Kososvo. Lord Alex Carlile of Berriew Q.C., Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, appointed by the UK Home Secretary to report to him and to Parliament; Head of Chambers (Chairman) at 9-12 Bell Yard, London WC2. David Feldman, Rouse Ball Professor of English Law at the University of Cambridge and Fellow of Downing College, Cambridge; Judge of the Court, Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina; former Legal Adviser to the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Houses of Parliament. Sir Ronnie Flanagan, HM Inspector of Constabulary. Tom Parker, Fellow at Brown University; former Special Adviser on Transitional Justice to the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) in Baghdad, Iraq and former Head of the CPA’s Crimes against Humanity Investigation Unit. Peter Smith Q.C., Deputy Judge, High Court, Northern Ireland; Judge of the Court of Appeals of Jersey and Guernsey. Harvard University’s Long-Term Legal Strategy Project is supported under Award MIPT- 2003D-C-002 from the National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) and the Office for Domestic Preparedness, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Points of view in this document are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security or MIPT. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are indebted to a number of individuals who provided insight and talent to this effort. We want to first thank our task force members as well as our advisors from the United Kingdom who, over the course of several meetings in Cambridge and in Oklahoma City, were exceptionally forthright, honest and productive. They have reviewed drafts and offered insights. Their collective talent and experience has rarely been replicated. We also want to pay tribute to our National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) partners. General Dennis J. Reimer always was an important contributor to this effort; James "Chip" O. Ellis III provided the necessary carrots and sticks and was a pleasure to work with; and, simply put, we are proud of Donald R. Hamilton's service to our country, but also grateful that he is home safely. Susan Lynch was served as our willing and able editor. Sady Cohen and Ben Lambert were instrumental law school partners. John Neffinger and Sharon Wilke helped tremendously in the final stages of this Report and its release. Tom Parker reminded us why we like the British so much. And Tom Lue, a "mere" Harvard law student, provided invaluable advice throughout. We are particularly indebted to him. Throughout we sought the advice of outside counsel -- both inside and outside government. Thank you. But, this all would not have been possible without Meredith Tunney who took this project on, gave it life, got everyone in the same room at the same time, edited and copied, and performed as a remarkable administrator of this Project. She was a patient and understanding partner in this effort. We thank her tremendously. Table of Contents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………...1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..11 Recommendations I. Coercive Interrogations……………………………………………………….23 II. Detentions……………………………………………………………………..33 III. Military Commissions………………………………………………………...51 IV. Targeted Killing………………………………………………………………59 V. Communications of U.S. Persons or Others within the United States Intercepted During the Targeting of Foreign Persons Abroad………………..71 VI. Information Collection………………………………………………………..79 VII. Identification of Individuals and Collection of Information for Federal Files…………………………………………………………………………...91 VIII. Surveillance of Religious and Political Meetings…………………………….99 IX. Distinctions Based on Group Membership………………………………….109 X. Oversight of Extraordinary Measures……………………………………….119 Appendix A: Counterterrorism Policies in the United
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Martha L. Minow
    Martha L. Minow 1525 Massachusetts Avenue Griswold 407, Harvard Law School Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-4276 [email protected] Current Academic Appointments: 300th Anniversary University Professor, Harvard University Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor Faculty, Harvard Graduate School of Education Faculty Associate, Carr Center for Human Rights, Harvard Kennedy School of Government Current Activities: Advantage Testing Foundation, Vice-Chair and Trustee American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Access to Justice Project American Bar Association Center for Innovation, Advisory Council American Law Institute, Member Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University, Director Campaign Legal Center, Board of Trustees Carnegie Corporation, Board of Trustees Committee to Visit the Harvard Business School, Harvard University Board of Overseers Facing History and Ourselves, Board of Scholars Harvard Data Science Review, Associate Editor Initiative on Harvard and the Legacy of Slavery Law, Violence, and Meaning Series, Univ. of Michigan Press, Co-Editor MacArthur Foundation, Director MIT Media Lab, Advisory Council MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, Co-Chair, External Advisory Council National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Science, Technology, and Law Profiles in Courage Award Selection Committee, JFK Library, Chair Russell Sage Foundation, Trustee Skadden Fellowship Foundation, Selection Trustee Susan Crown Exchange Foundation, Trustee WGBH Board of Trustees, Trustee Education: Yale Law School, J.D. 1979 Articles and Book Review Editor, Yale Law Journal, 1978-1979 Editor, Yale Law Journal, 1977-1978 Harvard Graduate School of Education, Ed.M. 1976 University of Michigan, A.B. 1975 Phi Beta Kappa, Magna Cum Laude James B. Angell Scholar, Branstrom Prize New Trier East High School, Winnetka, Illinois, 1968-1972 Honors and Fellowships: Leo Baeck Medal, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • An Original Model of the Independent Counsel Statute
    Michigan Law Review Volume 97 Issue 3 1998 An Original Model of the Independent Counsel Statute Ken Gormley Duquesne University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, President/ Executive Department Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Ken Gormley, An Original Model of the Independent Counsel Statute, 97 MICH. L. REV. 601 (1998). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol97/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ORIGINAL MODEL OF THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL STATUTE Ken Gormley * TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 602 I. HISTORY OF THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL STATUTE • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • • • • • • 608 A. An Urgent Push fo r Legislation . .. .. .. .. 609 B. Th e Constitutional Quandaries . .. .. .. .. 613 1. Th e App ointments Clause . .. .. .. .. 613 2. Th e Removal Controversy .. ................ 614 3. Th e Separation of Powers Bugaboo . .. 615 C. A New Start: Permanent Sp ecial Prosecutors and Other Prop osals .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 617 D. Legislation Is Born: S. 555 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 624 E. Th e Lessons of Legislative History . .. .. .. 626 II. THE FIRST TWENTY YEARS: ESTABLISHING THE LAW'S CONSTITUTIONALITY • . • • • • . • • • . • • • • . • • • • . • • • 633 III. REFORMING THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL LAW • • . • 639 A. Refo rm the Method and Frequency of App ointing In dependent <;ounsels ..... :........ 641 1. Amend the Triggering Device .
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Biographies
    SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES Christopher T. Bavitz Christopher T. Bavitz is the WilmerHale Clinical Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, where he co-teaches the Counseling and Legal Strategy in the Digital Age seminar and teaches the seminar, Music & Digital Media. He is also Managing Director of HLS’s Cyberlaw Clinic, based at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. And, he is a Faculty Co-Director of the Berkman Klein Center. Chris concentrates his practice on intellectual property and media law, particularly in the areas of music, entertainment, and technology. He oversees many of the Clinic’s projects relating to copyright, speech, advising of startups, and the use of technology to support access to justice, and he serves as the HLS Dean’s Designate to the Harvard Innovation Lab. Prior to joining the Clinic, Chris served as Senior Director of Legal Affairs for EMI Music North America. From 1998–2002, Chris was a litigation associate at Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal and RubinBaum LLP / Rubin Baum Levin Constant & Friedman, where he focused on copyright and trademark matters. Chris received his B.A., cum laude, from Tufts University in 1995 and his J.D. from University of Michigan Law School in 1998. Gabriella Blum, ’03 Gabriella Blum is the Rita E. Hauser Professor of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law at Harvard Law School, specializing in public international law, international negotiations, the law of armed conflict, and counterterrorism. She is also the Faculty Director of the Program on International Law and Armed Conflict (PILAC) and a member of the Program on Negotiation Executive Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Selection at the Clinton Administration's End
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 6 June 2001 Judicial Selection at the Clinton Administration's End Carl Tobias Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Carl Tobias, Judicial Selection at the Clinton Administration's End, 19(1) LAW & INEQ. 159 (2001). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol19/iss1/6 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Judicial Selection at the Clinton Administration's End Carl Tobias* Introduction During his presidency, Bill Clinton appointed almost half of the presently sitting federal appellate and district court judges. He, therefore, can justifiably claim that he has left a lasting imprint on the federal judiciary. During his 1992 presidential campaign, Clinton promised to choose intelligent, diligent, and independent judges who would increase balance, vigorously enforce fundamental constitutional rights, and possess measured judicial temperament. The initial achievement of the Clinton Administration in selecting members of the federal bench, who make it more diverse and who are exceptionally qualified, demonstrates that the President fulfilled these campaign pledges. President Clinton named unprecedented numbers and percentages of highly competent female and minority judges during his first two years in office. The record compiled is important, because diverse judges can improve their colleagues' understanding of complex questions that the federal courts must decide, might reduce bias in the justice process, and may increase the confidence of the American people in the federal judiciary. After 1994, however, President Clinton encountered greater difficulty in appointing women and minorities, as well as in filling the perennial federal court vacancies, primarily because the Republican Party had captured a large majority in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Administration
    ARTICLE PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION Elena Kagan TABLE OF CONTENTS I. NON-PRESIDENTIAL MECHANISMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL ..................... 2253 A. CongressionalControl ....................................................................................................... 2255 B. Self-Control ........................................................................................................................ 2260 C. Interest Group Control...................................................................................................... 2264 D . JudicialControl ................................................................................................................. 2269 II. PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION - SOME BACKGROUND AND HISTORY ........ 2272 A. Early Efforts ....................................................................................................................... 2274 B. The R eagan Era ................................................................................................................. 2277 C. A Postscript........................................................................................................................ 2281 III. PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE CLINTON YEARS ................................. 2281 A. Tvo Examples..................................................................................................................... 2282 B. Techniques: R eview, D irectives, and Appropriation..................................................... 2284 i. Review ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View the Celebration 60 Program
    Harvard Law School Leaders for Change SEPTEMBER 27-29, 2013 CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS OL • LEA CHO DE S RS F AW O L R D ra C b t H R e io A l n A V e N R c G A E H 60 WOMEN TRANSFORMING OUR COMMUNITIES & THE WORLD September 27–29, 2013 Program of Events and Speaker Biographies WOMEN TRANSFORMING OUR COMMUNITIES & THE WORLD Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz is proud to sponsor OL • LEA CHO DE S RS F AW O L R D ra C b t H R e io A l n A V e N R c G A E H 60 WOMEN TRANSFORMING OUR COMMUNITIES & THE WORLD September 27–29, 2013 and Recognizes our Women Harvard Law Graduates Stephanie J. Seligman Stephanie I. Gabor Deborah L. Paul Erica Mitnick Klein Rachelle Silverberg Kendall Y. Fox Laura Heller Kim B. Goldberg Carrie M. Reilly S. Iliana Ongun Tijana J. Dvornic Rachel B. Reisberg Caitlin A. Donovan Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 51 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 212-403-1000 www.wlrk.com OL • LEA CHO DE S RS F AW O L R D ra C b t H R e io A l n A V e N R c G A E H 60 WOMEN TRANSFORMING OUR COMMUNITIES & THE WORLD September 27–29, 2013 Table of Contents Welcome Letters ......................................................................................................... 4-5 Sponsors ..........................................................................................................................6 Committee Members ......................................................................................................7 Program of Events ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • • Au Safeguardlivg OUR YOUTH: Violence Prevention for Our Nations Children
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. SAFEGUARDING OUR YOUTH: Violence- Prevention ForOT~r Nations Children Forum Proceedings July 20-21, 1993 • au SAFEGUARDliVG OUR YOUTH: Violence Prevention For Our Nations Children Forum Proceedings Washington, D.C. July 20 -21, 1993 J '" ." . '~'., . Sponsored by U.S. Department of Education U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department ofHousing and Urban Development National School Safety Centel' Janumy 1994 NATIONAL SCHOOL SAFETY CENTER 4165 Thousand Oaks Boulevard. Suite 290 Westlake V1l1age. California 91362 805/373-9977 805/373-9277' FAX Dear Forum Attendee: Thank you for making Safeguarding Our Youth: Violence Preventionfor Our Nation's Children a success. Your participation and commitment of time at the forum are deeply appreciated. We are pleased to provide you with a copy of the forum proceedings that summarizes the suggestions and input of program participants. As Attorney General Janet Reno noted: "Each of us can make a positive difference in the lives of our nation's children. Your attendance and participation at the forum have already demonstrated your strong commitment to protecting our youth and making that difference happen in your own community. " Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley urged federal, state and local governments to view school safety as a top priority. He encouraged local communities to develop cooperative relationships among parents, students, school and community leaders. The National School Safety Center echoes the sentiments of the Attorney General and Secretary of Education. We appreciate you! Cordially, 146415 RONALD D.
    [Show full text]
  • Attorney General Reno Announce Her Team, Friday, April 2, 1993
    l. 1 : \ 11Btpartmtnt of 3[ustitt FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AG FRIOA~, APRIL 2, 1993 (202) 514-2007 TDD (202) 514-1888 \ ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO ANNOUNCES ItER TEAM ,I Attached is biographical information on the people Attorney I General Janet Reno has selected for senior level positions at the I Department of Justice. I These individuals will be available to the press in Conference Room A immediately following the announcements. BIOGRAPHY OF PHILIP BENJAMIN HEYMANN Philip Heymann is the James Barr Ames Professor at Harvard Law School, Director of the Center for Criminal Justice there, and Professor at Harvard I s Kennedy School of Government where he directs the Program for Senior Managers in Government. He was Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division of the u.S. Department of Justice from 1978-1981, Associate Watergate Special Prosecutor from 1973-1975, and, in the prior decade, held the following posts in the u.S. Department of State: Executive Assistant to the Undersecretary of State, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations, and head of the Bureau of Security and Consular Affairs. After clerking for Justice John Harlan of the U.S. Supreme Court he represented the U.s. government in the Solicitor General's Office from 1961-1965. As Director of the Center for Criminal Justice at Harvard, Professor Heymann has in recent years managed a number of projects designed to improve the criminal justice systems of countries seeking to create or preserve democratic institutions, including Guatemala, Colombia, South Africa, and Russia. He has written extensively on the subjects of management in government, combating corruption, and criminal justice and is co-author of a forthcoming book on strategies for dealing with terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard University's
    A joint project of Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and Harvard Law School Long-Term Legal Strategy Project for Preserving Security and Democratic Freedoms in the War on Terrorism Philip B. Heymann, Harvard Law School Juliette N. Kayyem, Kennedy School of Government Sponsored by The National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government administered the Long-Term Legal Strategy Project from April 2003 - November 2004. The Belfer Center provides leadership in advancing policy-relevant knowledge about the most important challenges of international security and other critical issues where science, technology, environmental policy, and international affairs intersect. To learn more about the Belfer Center, visit www.bcsia.ksg.harvard.edu. Long-Term Legal Strategy Project Attn: Meredith Tunney John F. Kennedy School of Government 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-5275 www.ksg.harvard.edu/bcsia/longtermlegalstrategy www.mipt.org/Long-Term-Legal-Strategy.asp Harvard University’s Long-Term Legal Strategy Project for Preserving Security and Democratic Freedoms in the War on Terrorism Board of Advisors All members of the Board of Advisors agreed with the necessity to evaluate the legal terrain governing the “war on terrorism.” This final Report is presented as a distillation of views and opinions based on a series of closed-door meetings of the Board. The advisors have from time to time been offered the opportunity to express views or make suggestions relating to the matters included in this Report, but have been under no obligation to do so, and the contents of the Report do not represent the specific beliefs of any given member of the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratizing the Police Abroad: What to Do and How to Do It
    01-Covers 7/30/01 2:01 PM Page 1 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Democratizing the Police Abroad: What to Do and How to Do It David H. Bayley Issues in International Crime 01-Covers 7/30/01 2:01 PM Page 2 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 John Ashcroft Attorney General Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij 02-Inside 7/30/01 2:03 PM Page i Democratizing the Police Abroad: What to Do and How to Do It David H. Bayley June 2001 NCJ 188742 Issues in International Crime 02-Inside 7/30/01 2:03 PM Page ii National Institute of Justice James O. Finckenauer Program Monitor David H. Bayley is a distinguished professor in the School of Criminal Justice at the State University of New York at Albany. Prepared for the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, under grant number 1999–IJ–CX–0055. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Policing in Transitional Societies
    Crime and Policing in Transitional Societies 30 August–1 September 2000 Jan Smuts House, University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg Table of Contents Introduction 7 Mark Shaw, South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA), South Africa Crime and Policing in Transitional Societies – 9 Conference Summary and Overview Mark Shaw, SAIIA, South Africa Welcoming Remarks 17 Michael Lange, Konrad Adenauer Foundation, South Africa Politics and Policing in Northern Ireland – The Way Ahead 19 Adam Ingram, Minister of State for Northern Ireland, United Kingdom South Africa: Crime and Policing in Transition 27 Steve Tshwete, Minister for Safety and Security, South Africa The Nigerian Experience 29 David Jemibewon, Minister for Police Affairs, Nigeria AN OVERVIEW OF PROBLEMS AND ISSUES The New Policing 35 Philip Heymann, Harvard University, United States Crime, Justice and the Legacy of the Past 61 Adrian Guelke, Queen’s University, Northern Ireland THE GROWTH, EXTENT AND CAUSES OF CRIME The Growth, Extent and Causes of Crime: International Crime Overview 69 Anna Alvazzi del Frate, United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI), Italy Crime, Violence and Political Uncertainty in Brazil 77 Paulo de Mesquita Neto, University of São Paulo, Brazil 3 Table of Contents The Growth, Extent and Causes of Crime: Moçambique 93 Luis Antonio Mondelane, Supreme Court, Moçambique The Growth, Extent and Causes of Crime: Ukraine 99 Igor Zhdanov, Ukrainian Centre for Economic and Political Studies, Ukraine The Growth, Extent and
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Ruling In
    Introduction Forty years ago the Warren Court decided the jurisprudential progeny of Baker v. Carr.3 Six cases, headed by Reynolds v. Sims,4 continued to remake the legal landscape of legislative apportionment using the “one person, one vote” principle. For President Kennedy’s Solicitor General, Archibald Cox, the decisions in Reynolds et al. were dangerous. He feared they would precipitate a constitutional crisis that would underscore why Justice Frankfurter, his mentor, had urged his judicial colleagues to avoid entangling their institution in the “political thicket” of legislative apportionment. In this paper I challenge the conventional wisdom that depicts the solicitor general as a ‘Tenth Justice’, the leader of an office with which is associated institutional norms and traditions that create a ‘special relationship’ between the solicitor general and the nine justices of the United States Supreme Court. Analysis is confined to Lucas v. Colorado General Assembly, one of the five cases decided with Reynolds. Cox believed that the federal government should not file any amicus curiae briefs supporting the extension of the one person, one vote standard in the reapportionment cases. Lucas posed the greatest problem for him because it involved a constitutional challenge to an apportionment plan that consisted of an amendment to the Colorado State Constitution adopted through a referendum, and supported by a majority of the voters in every county in Colorado. Appointed by President Kennedy in 1961, Archibald Cox became the thirty-first Solicitor General. He is widely acknowledged to have been one of the best Solicitors General, once referred to as “the Willie Mays of Supreme Court lawyers.”5 He came to an office steeped in tradition, where the traditional uniform for participation in oral arguments is the morning suit; it 3 369 U.S.
    [Show full text]