DOCSLIB.ORG

Harvard University's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harvard University's A joint project of Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and Harvard Law School Long-Term Legal Strategy Project for Preserving Security and Democratic Freedoms in the War on Terrorism Philip B. Heymann, Harvard Law School Juliette N. Kayyem, Kennedy School of Government Sponsored by The National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government administered the Long-Term Legal Strategy Project from April 2003 - November 2004. The Belfer Center provides leadership in advancing policy-relevant knowledge about the most important challenges of international security and other critical issues where science, technology, environmental policy, and international affairs intersect. To learn more about the Belfer Center, visit www.bcsia.ksg.harvard.edu. Long-Term Legal Strategy Project Attn: Meredith Tunney John F. Kennedy School of Government 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-5275 www.ksg.harvard.edu/bcsia/longtermlegalstrategy www.mipt.org/Long-Term-Legal-Strategy.asp Harvard University’s Long-Term Legal Strategy Project for Preserving Security and Democratic Freedoms in the War on Terrorism Board of Advisors All members of the Board of Advisors agreed with the necessity to evaluate the legal terrain governing the “war on terrorism.” This final Report is presented as a distillation of views and opinions based on a series of closed-door meetings of the Board. The advisors have from time to time been offered the opportunity to express views or make suggestions relating to the matters included in this Report, but have been under no obligation to do so, and the contents of the Report do not represent the specific beliefs of any given member of the Board. The authors of the Long-Term Legal Strategy Report, Philip Heymann and Juliette Kayyem, are responsible for the final analysis herein. Directors Philip B. Heymann, James Barr Ames Professor of Law at the Harvard Law School; former Deputy U.S. Attorney General; former Associate Prosecutor and Consultant to the Wartergate Special Force. Juliette N. Kayyem, Acting Executive Director for Research and Adjunct Lecturer at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government; former Member the National Commission on Terrorism; former Legal Adviser to the Attorney General. Advisors Joseph R. (Bob) Barnes, Senior Policy Advisor (Department of Defense), The Nature Conservancy; Brigadier General, U.S. Army (retired). Bob Barr, 21st Century Liberties Chair for Freedom and Privacy, American Conservative Union. Rand Beers, Former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Combating Terrorism; National Security/Homeland Security Issue Coordinator for John Kerry’s Presidential campaign. Michael Chertoff, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; former Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division at the U.S Department of Justice (2001- 2003). Vicki Divoll, Former General Counsel (2001-2003) to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence; former Assistant General Counsel to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Paul Evans, Director, Police Standards Unit, London; former Police Commissioner, Boston Police Department. Neil Gallagher, Homeland Security Executive, Bank of America; former Assistant Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) National Security Division. Mary Graham, Co-Director, Transparency Policy Project, Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government; Visiting Fellow, Brookings Institution. Donald R. Hamilton, Coalition Provisional Authority, Baghdad, Iraq and Deputy Director, National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Eleanor Hill, Partner, King & Spalding, LLP; former Staff Director, House and Senate Intelligence Committees’ Joint Inquiry regarding the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001. Lance Liebman, Director, American Law Institute; William S. Beinecke Professor of Law at Columbia Law School; Director, Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law. John MacGaffin, Former Member, Senior Intelligence Service and former Associate Deputy Director for Operations for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); former Senior Advisor to the Director and Deputy Director for the Federal Bureau for Investigation (FBI). Robert McNamara, Jr., Former General Counsel to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and former Chief Enforcement Attorney for the U.S. Treasury Department. Oliver "Buck" Revell, Founder and President Revell Group International, Inc.; former Special Agent and former Senior Executive to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Suzanne Spaulding, Chair of the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Law and National Security; former Democratic Staff Director for the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in the U.S. House of Representatives. Michael Traynor, Lawyer practicing in San Francisco, California. Michael Vatis, Independent Consultant on Security and Intelligence issues and an Attorney; former Official for the Departments of Defense and Justice and the FBI. Participants from the United Kingdom Experts from the United Kingdom served as observers to the proceedings. Chris Albiston, Consultant to the Director General of the Estonian Police Service in Tallinn; former head of the Police Service of Northern Ireland’s (PSNI) Crime Department; former United Nations Police Commissioner in Kososvo. Lord Alex Carlile of Berriew Q.C., Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, appointed by the UK Home Secretary to report to him and to Parliament; Head of Chambers (Chairman) at 9-12 Bell Yard, London WC2. David Feldman, Rouse Ball Professor of English Law at the University of Cambridge and Fellow of Downing College, Cambridge; Judge of the Court, Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina; former Legal Adviser to the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Houses of Parliament. Sir Ronnie Flanagan, HM Inspector of Constabulary. Tom Parker, Fellow at Brown University; former Special Adviser on Transitional Justice to the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) in Baghdad, Iraq and former Head of the CPA’s Crimes against Humanity Investigation Unit. Peter Smith Q.C., Deputy Judge, High Court, Northern Ireland; Judge of the Court of Appeals of Jersey and Guernsey. Harvard University’s Long-Term Legal Strategy Project is supported under Award MIPT- 2003D-C-002 from the National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) and the Office for Domestic Preparedness, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Points of view in this document are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security or MIPT. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are indebted to a number of individuals who provided insight and talent to this effort. We want to first thank our task force members as well as our advisors from the United Kingdom who, over the course of several meetings in Cambridge and in Oklahoma City, were exceptionally forthright, honest and productive. They have reviewed drafts and offered insights. Their collective talent and experience has rarely been replicated. We also want to pay tribute to our National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) partners. General Dennis J. Reimer always was an important contributor to this effort; James "Chip" O. Ellis III provided the necessary carrots and sticks and was a pleasure to work with; and, simply put, we are proud of Donald R. Hamilton's service to our country, but also grateful that he is home safely. Susan Lynch was served as our willing and able editor. Sady Cohen and Ben Lambert were instrumental law school partners. John Neffinger and Sharon Wilke helped tremendously in the final stages of this Report and its release. Tom Parker reminded us why we like the British so much. And Tom Lue, a "mere" Harvard law student, provided invaluable advice throughout. We are particularly indebted to him. Throughout we sought the advice of outside counsel -- both inside and outside government. Thank you. But, this all would not have been possible without Meredith Tunney who took this project on, gave it life, got everyone in the same room at the same time, edited and copied, and performed as a remarkable administrator of this Project. She was a patient and understanding partner in this effort. We thank her tremendously. Table of Contents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………...1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..11 Recommendations I. Coercive Interrogations……………………………………………………….23 II. Detentions……………………………………………………………………..33 III. Military Commissions………………………………………………………...51 IV. Targeted Killing………………………………………………………………59 V. Communications of U.S. Persons or Others within the United States Intercepted During the Targeting of Foreign Persons Abroad………………..71 VI. Information Collection………………………………………………………..79 VII. Identification of Individuals and Collection of Information for Federal Files…………………………………………………………………………...91 VIII. Surveillance of Religious and Political Meetings…………………………….99 IX. Distinctions Based on Group Membership………………………………….109 X. Oversight of Extraordinary Measures……………………………………….119 Appendix A: Counterterrorism Policies in the United
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Martha L. Minow
    Martha L. Minow 1525 Massachusetts Avenue Griswold 407, Harvard Law School Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-4276 [email protected] Current Academic Appointments: 300th Anniversary University Professor, Harvard University Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor Faculty, Harvard Graduate School of Education Faculty Associate, Carr Center for Human Rights, Harvard Kennedy School of Government Current Activities: Advantage Testing Foundation, Vice-Chair and Trustee American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Access to Justice Project American Bar Association Center for Innovation, Advisory Council American Law Institute, Member Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University, Director Campaign Legal Center, Board of Trustees Carnegie Corporation, Board of Trustees Committee to Visit the Harvard Business School, Harvard University Board of Overseers Facing History and Ourselves, Board of Scholars Harvard Data Science Review, Associate Editor Initiative on Harvard and the Legacy of Slavery Law, Violence, and Meaning Series, Univ. of Michigan Press, Co-Editor MacArthur Foundation, Director MIT Media Lab, Advisory Council MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, Co-Chair, External Advisory Council National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Science, Technology, and Law Profiles in Courage Award Selection Committee, JFK Library, Chair Russell Sage Foundation, Trustee Skadden Fellowship Foundation, Selection Trustee Susan Crown Exchange Foundation, Trustee WGBH Board of Trustees, Trustee Education: Yale Law School, J.D. 1979 Articles and Book Review Editor, Yale Law Journal, 1978-1979 Editor, Yale Law Journal, 1977-1978 Harvard Graduate School of Education, Ed.M. 1976 University of Michigan, A.B. 1975 Phi Beta Kappa, Magna Cum Laude James B. Angell Scholar, Branstrom Prize New Trier East High School, Winnetka, Illinois, 1968-1972 Honors and Fellowships: Leo Baeck Medal, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Services Ombudsmen. This Consultation
    The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 196 PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMEN A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Munby (Chairman), Professor Elizabeth Cooke, Mr David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod1 and Miss Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is: Mr Mark Ormerod CB. Topic of this consultation This consultation paper deals with the public services ombudsmen. Impact assessment An impact assessment is included in Appendix A. Scope of this consultation The purpose of this consultation is to generate responses to our provisional proposals. Duration of the consultation We invite responses from 2 September 2010 to 3 December 2010. How to respond By email to: [email protected] By post to: Public Law Team, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London, SW1H 9LJ Tel: 020-3334-0262 / Fax: 020-3334-0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, wherever possible, you could send them to us electronically as well (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format. After the consultation In the light of the responses we receive, we will decide our final recommendations and we will present them to Parliament. It will be for Parliament to decide whether to approve any changes to the law. Code of Practice We are a signatory to the Government’s Code of Practice on Consultation and carry out our consultations in accordance with the Code criteria (set out on the next page).
    [Show full text]
  • Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking
    AP PHOTO/CHARLES DHARAPAK PHOTO/CHARLES AP Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 6 Findings 14 First-order questions for the next president 17 Best practices to consider 26 Policymaking versus oversight versus crisis management 36 Meetings, meetings, and more meetings 61 Internal NSC staff management 72 Appendix A 73 About the authors 74 Endnotes Introduction and summary Most modern presidents have found that the transition from campaigning to governing presents a unique set of challenges, especially regarding their newfound national security responsibilities. Regardless of their party affiliation or preferred diplomatic priorities, presidents have invariably come to appreciate that they can- not afford to make foreign policy decisions in the same manner as they did when they were a candidate. The requirements of managing an enormous and complex national security bureau- cracy reward careful deliberation and strategic consistency, while sharply punishing the kind of policy shifts that are more common on the campaign trail. Statements by the president are taken far more seriously abroad than are promises by a candidate, by both allies and adversaries alike. And while policy mistakes made before entering office can damage a candidate’s personal political prospects, a serious misstep made once in office can put the country itself at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by the Police Ombudsman for Northern
    SSTTAATTEEMMEENNTT BBYY TTHHEE PPOOLLIICCEE OOMMBBUUDDSSMMAANN FFOORR NNOORRTTHHEERRNN IIRREELLAANNDD OONN HHEERR IINNVVEESSTTIIGGAATTIIOONN OOFF MMAATTTTEERRSS RREELLAATTIINNGG TTOO TTHHEE OOMMAAGGHH BBOOMMBBIINNGG OONN AAUUGGUUSSTT 1155 11999988 The persons responsible for the Omagh Bombing are the terrorists who planned and executed the atrocity. Nothing contained in this report should detract from that clear and unequivocal fact. Wednesday 12 December 2001 STATEMENT OF THE POLICE OMBUDSMAN FOR NORTHERN IRELAND IN RELATION TO THE OMAGH BOMB INVESTIGATION REPORT 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Under the provisions of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 (the Police Act), Section 55(6)(b), the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (the Police Ombudsman) may, without a complaint, formally investigate a matter in accordance with Section 56 of the Act if it is desirable in the public interest. 1.2 A Report has been presented to the Secretary of State, the Northern Ireland Policing Board and the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) under Regulation 20 of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (Complaints etc.) Regulations 2000. The public interest relates to material issues preceding and following the Omagh Bomb on 15 August 1998. 1.3 This Statement in relation to the Report on the Omagh Bomb is published under Section 62 of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 2. THE OMAGH BOMB 2.1 On Saturday 15 August 1998 at approximately 3.05 p.m. a terrorist bomb (the Omagh Bomb) exploded in the small county town of Omagh, County Tyrone, Northern Ireland. Three telephone calls were made, the first of which was at 2.29 p.m. warning that a bomb was going to detonate in the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Against Nature Is Ultimately About the Corrosive Effect of Corporate Corruption on Our Core American Values—Free-Market Capitalism and Democracy
    PDF Page No: 1 PDF Page No: 2 Inside Front/Back Cover In this powerful and far-reaching indictment of George W. Bush’s White House, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the country’s most prominent environmental attorney, charges that this administration has taken corporate cronyism to such unprecedented heights that it now threatens our health, our national security, and democracy as we know it. In a headlong pursuit of private profit and personal power, Kennedy writes, George Bush and his administration have eviscerated the laws that have protected our nations air, water, public lands, and wildlife for the past thirty years, enriching the president’s political contributors while lowering the quality of life for the rest of us. Kennedy lifts the veil on how the administration has orchestrated these rollbacks almost entirely outside of public scrutiny—and in tandem with the very industries that our laws are meant to regulate, the country’s most notorious polluters. He writes of how it has deceived the public by manipulating and suppressing scientific data, intimidated enforcement officials and other civil servants, and masked its agenda with Orwellian doublespeak. He reports on how the White House doles out lavish subsidies and tax breaks to the energy barons while excusing industry from providing adequate security at the more than 15,000 chemical and nuclear facilities that are prime targets for terrorist attacks. Kennedy reveals an administration whose policies have “squandered our Treasury, entangled us in foreign wars, diminished our international prestige, made us a target for terrorist attacks, and increased our reliance on petty Middle Eastern dictators who despise democracy and are hated by their own people.” Crimes Against Nature is ultimately about the corrosive effect of corporate corruption on our core American values—free-market capitalism and democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Activities of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
    1 114th Congress " ! REPORT 1st Session SENATE 114–33 ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE AND ITS SUBCOMMITTEES FOR THE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS April 20, 2015—Ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 49–010 WASHINGTON : 2015 VerDate Sep 11 2014 02:15 Apr 21, 2015 Jkt 049010 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\SR033.XXX SR033 SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ROB PORTMAN, Ohio CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri RAND PAUL, Kentucky JON TESTER, Montana JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey JONI ERNST, Iowa GARY PETERS, Michigan BEN SASSE, Nebraska KEITH B. ASHDOWN, Staff Director CHRISTOPHER R. HIXON, Chief Counsel GABRIELLE A. BATKIN, Minority Staff Director JOHN P. KILVINGTON, Minority Deputy Staff Director MARYBETH SCHULTZ, Minority Chief Counsel LAURA W. KILBRIDE, Chief Clerk COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS DURING THE 113TH CONGRESS THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware, Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JON TESTER, Montana RAND PAUL, Kentucky MARK BEGICH, Alaska MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota JEFF CHIESA, New Jersey 1 SUBCOMMITTEES OF THE 113TH CONGRESS PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS (PSI) CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman MARK L.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary BBC Trained Journalist Accomplished Copywriter PR
    Summary ▪ BBC trained journalist ▪ Accomplished copywriter ▪ PR consultant for over 10 years ▪ Highly organised, proactive, diligent, creative and accountable professional ▪ Sociable and motivational leader, mentor and team member ▪ Adaptable and flexible, able to work with a variety of sectors and clients ▪ French speaker, some Italian I trained as a Broadcast Journalist with the BBC and worked on BBC Breakfast News, Breakfast with Frost and Watchdog. This experience gave me a good eye for a news story, the ability to research and interview and to write clear, concise copy. I have experience of writing a variety of literature, for both corporate and consumer projects and for a wide range of different audiences. I am used to seeing a copywriting project through from initial stages of research and interview, to writing and editing, liaising with designers to choose and place graphics or animation, and with printers to bring the project in under budget and to a high quality. I work quickly and accurately, and can turn my hand to anything from a manifesto on eco-paper manufacturing to a company annual report, copy for a new website or a product brochure for the beauty industry. Employment History (2007-present) Edelman, Copywriter Brand research and positioning strategy for Dove global projects – focus on messaging for women Blue Rubicon, Copywriter Investigation for and writing of strategy document for personal injury lawyer client Lawson Dodd, Copywriter Researching and writing half-yearly investment report for Barclays Private Equity Grayling PR, Copywriter Project manager and copywriter for new global, rebranded Grayling PR website following company merger with Trimedia and MmD.
    [Show full text]
  • Maladministration and Its Remedies
    THE HAMLYN LECTURES Twenty-fifth Series MALADMINISTRATION AND ITS REMEDIES K. C. Wheare STEVENS MALADMINISTRATION AND ITS REMEDIES by K. C. WHEARE Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford Maladministration may be defined as administrative action (or inaction) based on or influenced by improper considerations or conduct. In this book, published contemporaneously with the 25th series of lectures under the auspices of the Hamlyn Trust, Sir Kenneth Wheare discusses the existing remedies for maladministration in Britain, and assesses their effec- tiveness in comparison with those available in other countries, particularly in Europe. The book begins with a comprehensive survey of maladministration as it may occur in the actions of the officials of both central and local government With the tendency towards giant departments in central government, and with the introduction in 1974 of enlarged local government units, the author sees a real danger, not only that public administration may be still further removed from those it is intended to serve, but also that more administration is likely to mean correspondingly more maladministration. The discussion opens up the vast question of how a civil service should be recruited and organised in the first place. The author goes on to consider, in separate chapters, the institutions intended at present to remedy mal- administration. He discusses the work of the Courts of Law, including Tribunals, and compares them with their counterparts in France and elsewhere. He takes a fresh look at the doctrine of Ministerial Respon- sibility and considers the effectiveness of Parliamentary Select Committees and Public and Ministerial Inquiries, making particular reference to the 1954 Crichel Down affair and to the yehicle and General Insurance Inquiry of 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliamentary Ombudsman: Firefighter Or Fire-Watcher?
    12 The Parliamentary Ombudsman: Firefi ghter or fi re-watcher? Contents 1. In search of a role 2. The PCA’s offi ce 3. From maladministration to good administration 4. Firefi ghting or fi re-watching? (a) The small claims court (b) Ombudsmen and courts (c) Fire-watching: Inspection and audit 5. Inquisitorial procedure (a) Screening (b) Investigation (c) Report 6. The ‘Big Inquiry’ (a) Grouping complaints: The Child Support Agency (b) Political cases 7. Occupational pensions: Challenging the ombudsman 8. Control by courts? 9. Conclusion: An ombudsman unfettered? 1. In search of a role In Chapter 10, we considered complaints-handling by the administration, set- tling for a ‘bottom-up’ approach. Th is led us to focus on proportionate dispute resolution (PDR) and machinery, such as internal review, by which complaints can be settled before they ripen into disputes. In so doing, we diverged from the ‘top-down’ tradition of administrative law where tribunals are seen as court substitutes. We returned to the classic approach in Chapter 11, looking at the recent reorganisation of the tribunal service and its place in the administrative justice system. We saw how the oral and adversarial tradition of British justice was refl ected in tribunal procedure and considered the importance attached to impartiality and independence, values now protected by ECHR Art. 6(1). We, 529 The Parliamentary Ombudsman: Firefi ghter or fi re-watcher? however, argued that recent reshaping of the tribunal system left unanswered key questions about oral and adversarial proceedings and whether they are always the most appropriate vehicle for resolving disputes with the administra- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Werner Herzog Interview with a Legend
    July/August 2019 Werner Herzog Interview with a legend David Harewood | Alex Scott | The South Bank Show CREATE MAXIMUM IMPACT WITH MUSIC A collection of epic music composed, recorded and produced specifically for film trailers and broadcast programming, from stirring emotional drama to apocalyptic action. AVAILABLE FOR LICENCE AT AUDIONETWORK.COM/DISCOVER/MAXIMUMIMPACT FIND OUT MORE: Rebecca Hodges [email protected] (0)207 566 1441 1012-RTS ADVERTS-MAX_IMPACT-V2.indd 1 25/06/2019 09:31 Journal of The Royal Television Society July/August 2019 l Volume 56/7 From the CEO We have just enjoyed We had a full house as some of televi- creative icon, Werner Herzog. His new two outstanding sion’s most successful storytellers BBC Arena film, focusing on his rela- national RTS events, shared their approaches to their craft. tionship with Bruce Chatwin, is some- the RTS Student Tele- I am very grateful to the event’s joint thing to look forward to this autumn. vision Awards and a organisers, Directors Cut Productions, Don’t miss Simon Shaps’s incisive live South Bank Show Sky Arts and Premier. review of a new book that analyses the special devoted to the I am thrilled that Alex Scott found the recent battle to own Sky, and Stewart art of screenwriting. Many thanks to time to write this edition’s Our Friend Purvis’s account of how the politics of all of you who worked hard to make column. The Women’s World Cup Brexit are challenging news broadcast- these happen. Congratulations to all really did capture and hold the pub- ers and what impartiality means in a the nominees and winners of the lic’s imagination: England’s semi-final fragmenting political landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • History GCSE Twitter Resource Pack Below Is a Collection of Curriculum
    History GCSE Twitter Resource Pack Below is a collection of curriculum specific broadcast material, sorted by exam board and then study theme. The document will be updated as new content is added and old content is removed. OCR – History B Thematic Study - The Peoples Health c1250 to present; Crime and Punishment c1250 to present; Migrants to Britain c.1250 to present. The Peoples Health c1250 to present - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p035cygx - History of Pharmacology – charting the use of potions, herbs and drugs to relieve suffering through the ages. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p035cygy - A History of Healing – A report on healers around the world - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08q317p - In Our Time – Louis Pasteur – history of germ theory. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0644gn8 - History of the National Health Service told through one hospital, the QEII. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007753d - In Our Time – Microbiology – discusses Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0077501 - The Making of Modern Medicine – Culturing the Germ Theory. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00k9b7r/episodes/player - Whole section. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p035cy0r - Modern Medicine - a look at how doctors in the East and West have been swapping ideas for centuries. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00775zv - In Our Time – History of anaesthetics – laughing gas in the 1790s to the discovery of ‘blessed chloroform’. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07dnnkm - In Our Time – Discovery of Penicillin - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00wgby7 - The Birth of the welfare state - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00w65my - Clip - Health and Housing in the 19th Century Crime and Punishment c1250 to present - https://www.bbc.co.uk/education/topics/z6xmn39/resources/1 - BBC Bitesize - Crime and Punishment through time Class Clips - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b02x9rfj/clips - BBC - London’s oldest prison – the first prison for female convicts.
    [Show full text]
  • HLS in the World
    HLS in the World Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law Faculty Host: Susan Crawford ​ Participants: Edward Felten, Stasia Kelly ​ Join Edward Felten, one of the nation's leading experts on artificial intelligence, and Stasia Kelly, a leader of DLA Piper, as they discuss the effect of artificial intelligence on the practice of law. When clients get their answers from machines, what's left for lawyers to do? The Changing Political and Intellectual Landscape of Criminal Justice Reform Faculty Hosts: Andrew Crespo ’08, Carol Steiker ’86, Alex Whiting ​ ​ ​ Participants: Rachel Barkow ’96, Brook Hopkins ’07, Alan Jenkins ’89, Derecka Purnell ​ ’17, Jonathan Wroblewski The law, politics, and scholarship of criminal justice reform have been shifting in potentially tectonic ways. After several decades of increasingly punitive policies across the country which resulted in surging incarceration rates, the last several years have seen an increasingly bipartisan shift towards a critique of what has come to be called mass incarceration. Yet, the recent presidential election signals a shift in federal priorities away from a reform agenda a development that may (or may not) have consequences for the recent trajectory in favor of reform by many state and local actors. This interactive discussion explores these crosscurrents in the law, policy, and discourse surrounding our criminal justice system. Constitutionalism and Courts: A Transnational Conversation Among Judges Faculty Hosts: Vicki Jackson, Mark Tushnet ​ Participants: Rosalie Abella, Manuel Jose Cepeda LL.M. ’87, Dieter Grimm LL.M. ’65, ​ Koenraad Lenaerts LL.M. ’78, Sandile Ngcobo LL.M. ’86 A moderated discussion among justices from high courts around the world about, among other topics, the challenges they face, the ways they interpret their constitutions and similar documents, and the role of international and comparative law in their work.
    [Show full text]