DOCSLIB.ORG

Native Title Recognition Set for Two of the Oldest Claims in SA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Aboriginal Way Issue 57, Winter 2014 A publication of South Australian Native Title Services Simpson Desert Native title recognition set for two of the oldest claims in SA Two of the oldest native title claims “Our native title claim is one of the Kokatha country that is being recognised, Andamooka Station, to the west of in South Australia’s northern longest claim’s that’s been on record in this is important to us,” said Ms Thomas. Lake Torrens, holds special meaning regions are set to be determined South Australia, and we have been able Prior to the Consent Determination, to Kokatha people. later this year. to secure one of the largest settlements. negotiations with the State Government Mr Starkey said “Where the Consent The Kokatha claim will be determined by There’s a whole raft of emotions and and BHP Billiton for agreements dealing Determination will be held is of great Chief Justice Allsop on 1 September at there are really no words to describe how with tenure issues and compensation for Andamooka Station. we feel at this point,” Mr Starkey said. the native title claimants will be finalised. cultural significance to Kokatha people. Many people were born there and grew Although updated and re-lodged with the Joyleen Thomas, co-applicant also Osker Linde, the group’s solicitor said the up on the station and surrounding areas, Federal Court in 2012, the claim dates reflected on the journey and importance negotiations are significant because of the and some of our people are buried there. back to 1996. of the recognition of country. vested interest in some of the claim area. That is why we have a strong affiliation “It covers most of the country between Andrew Starkey, Chair of Kokatha Mula “It’s been a long 18 years for us fighting to the place.” Aboriginal Corporation said it’s been a to get our native title rights recognised, the Lake Gairdner salt lake and Lake long struggle for Kokatha but the fight and we have learnt many lessons along Torrens, the claim area includes Roxby The consent determination covers over Downs and Olympic Dam and this has has been for the recognition and identity the way”. 33, 807 sq km of land and will recognise meant complex land use negotiations of their people the non-exclusive native title rights of This determination “is about getting with BHP and the State”. “Kokatha’s aspirations for recognition recognition for our grandparents, our the Kokatha people to hunt, fish, camp, Mr Linde said “after years of conflict and of land started long before native title. ancestors, and also for our children gather and undertake cultural activities, dispute resolution, finalising the claim has It happened many decades earlier when and grandchildren. It is important for such as ceremonies and meetings, and by no means been easy. our Elders took notice of what was our children to have a place in the world, protect places of cultural significance happening in the Northern Territory, to have identity and belonging, and to It is great to finally be at the end of this on country. especially at Wave Hill and have continued feel connected to the country of their process and to see Kokatha achieve their to fight for recognition of our country.” ancestors. Although it is only a portion of native title”. continued on page 3 Inside: Federal cuts to South Australia’s regional and remote Aboriginal communities and homelands 2 NAIDOC – a time for action 8 Days may be numbered Deloitte review of for Charities and Not- the roles and for-profits Commission functions of native The abolishment of The Australian replace the role of the ACNC. The review title organisations Charities and Not-for-profits agrees with the Minister’s proposal. Commission (ACNC) has been The National Native Title Council (NNTC) The first review of the roles and to funding. The review recommends recommended in a review by the functions of native title organisations limited additional funding be provided to made a submission to the review Senate Economics Legislation was recently published by Deloitte. RNTBCs for capacity to move forward committee, which was firmly against Committee (SELC). after a native title is determined. the removal of the ACNC. The Deloitte Review looked into the A Bill aimed to end the ACNC was roles and functions of native title The review’s other major findings include: The NNTC stated it is concerned put forward to the Senate in late representative bodies (NTRBs) and • NTRBs/NTSPs will continue to play with the lack of information about the native title service providers (NTSPs), March this year. After inquiry by The a large role in the native title system suggested National Centre of Excellence in particular how these organisations Senate Committee, it agreed the Bill • RNTBCs are struggling in their ability support native title holders and their should be passed. and support provided by the ACNC to meet their responsibilities due to a Registered Native Title Bodies Corporate needs to carry on as is. gap between capacity and aspirations One of the objectives of the ACNC (RNTBCs) in managing native title. and is impacting the success of is to remove unnecessary regulatory “It is essential for Indigenous The review also looked at the native title managing native title land obligations on Australian not-for-profit corporations to continue to receive system as a whole, and roles of NTRBs/ • To function effectively RNTBCs need: organisations including Native Title tailored education, training and NTSPs in closing the gap. 1. Initial support to help them Representative Bodies (NTRBs), assistance that respond to the particular The review found than the native title determine how they would like Native Title Service Providers (NTSPs) needs of Indigenous groups”, said system ‘is moving in a positive direction’, to use their native title and Registered Native Title Body Brian Wyatt, CEO of NNTC. however, more clarity is needed now that 2. A base level of support to meet Corporates (RNTBs). The information regarding the proposed we are moving into a post-determination their obligations under the Act. environment. For the system to properly The Commission is an advocate and National Centre of Excellence will be • Long-term responsibility should be function native title holders need to be provider of education, training and provided in the Australian Charities and promoted through limiting ongoing development opportunities. in a position to make informed decisions Not-for-profits Commission (Repeal) government support about how they move forward and The Hon. Kevin Andrews, Minister for (No. 2) Bill, which is yet to be introduced ‘enjoy fully’ their native title rights and To read the report and the entire Social Services, plans to establish a into parliament. To read the review visit interests. It was found that RNTBCs are list of findings visit National Centre for Excellence to aph.gov.au usually not in a position to assist due deloitteaccesseconomics.com.au Federal cuts to South Australia’s regional and remote Aboriginal communities and homelands The federal Liberal government The Funding of around 10 million is used use to access these communities in some communities heavily relying upon it has confirmed annual funding for for the running of basic services, such medical emergencies. to run basic services. as infrastructure maintenance, power, municipal and essential services Hon. Ian Hunter, Minister for Aboriginal water, food services, rubbish collection This is expected to impact more than Affairs said “the State Government (MES) for South Australia’s regional and community governance. 4000 Aboriginal residents in more than plans to fight the Federal government and remote Aboriginal communities 700 homes across the state. The Commonwealth subsidy also on this cut as the State government is will no longer be provided after provides maintenance of landing strips The Commonwealth government has not in a position to make up the money June next year. that the Royal Flying Doctor Service provided this funding for fifty years, with that is being cut”. Kardi Munaintya (Emu Dreaming) tram wrap The Kardi Munaintya (Emu The design recognises and celebrates the In the spirit of reconciliation, the The kardi design celebrates the living Dreaming) tram is a living work diversity of Aboriginal cultures in South arrangement of concentric circles culture of the Kaurna people. Kardi Australia by acknowledging all thirty-nine symbolise the diversity of the tram footprints are shown symbolically of art symbolising the importance major Aboriginal Nations/Language Groups stop/meeting places along the Glenelg meandering across the Kaurna/Adelaide of Aboriginal art and culture in whose country is either fully or partly to Adelaide Entertainment Centre landscape. The kardi is a significant a contemporary setting. located within the state of South Australia. tramline. totem animal for the Kaurna people. 2 Aboriginal Way, Winter 2014 Native title recognition set for two of the oldest claims in SA continued from page 1 that as traditional owners our connection sites, it will allow us to negotiate for the “It’s great that it’s finally come to to country is finally being recognised.” security and protection of our country fruition. I regret that it has taken so A consent determination for the with miners, pastoralists and land long but now that it’s here it is a great Wangkangurru/Yarluyandi native title Ms Barr said native title will help managers and that is the most important outcome, and there is no doubt by the claim is set to follow on 3 October in shape the future of the Wangkangurru Court that they are the true people of Birdsville at Jardines waterhole. Yarluyandi community. thing of all, “ he said. the Simpson Desert.” The claim covers approximately “For the children, it will play a big part Mr Rowlands said the Wangkangurru Mr Kenny said that although the claim Yarluyandi community is “keen and 80,000 kilometres of land in Queensland in their lives to come, it is about being had to comply with the South Australian happy to be receiving native title.” and South Australia, including three recognised for who they are and where and Queensland requirements, the Simpson Desert Parks and the iconic they come from and where they fit in.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    This item is Chapter 1 of Language, land & song: Studies in honour of Luise Hercus Editors: Peter K. Austin, Harold Koch & Jane Simpson ISBN 978-0-728-60406-3 http://www.elpublishing.org/book/language-land-and-song Introduction Harold Koch, Peter Austin and Jane Simpson Cite this item: Harold Koch, Peter Austin and Jane Simpson (2016). Introduction. In Language, land & song: Studies in honour of Luise Hercus, edited by Peter K. Austin, Harold Koch & Jane Simpson. London: EL Publishing. pp. 1-22 Link to this item: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/2001 __________________________________________________ This electronic version first published: March 2017 © 2016 Harold Koch, Peter Austin and Jane Simpson ______________________________________________________ EL Publishing Open access, peer-reviewed electronic and print journals, multimedia, and monographs on documentation and support of endangered languages, including theory and practice of language documentation, language description, sociolinguistics, language policy, and language revitalisation. For more EL Publishing items, see http://www.elpublishing.org 1 Introduction Harold Koch,1 Peter K. Austin 2 & Jane Simpson 1 Australian National University1 & SOAS University of London 2 1. Introduction Language, land and song are closely entwined for most pre-industrial societies, whether the fishing and farming economies of Homeric Greece, or the raiding, mercenary and farming economies of the Norse, or the hunter- gatherer economies of Australia. Documenting a language is now seen as incomplete unless documenting place, story and song forms part of it. This book presents language documentation in its broadest sense in the Australian context, also giving a view of the documentation of Australian Aboriginal languages over time.1 In doing so, we celebrate the achievements of a pioneer in this field, Luise Hercus, who has documented languages, land, song and story in Australia over more than fifty years.
  • Mutawintji Lands Plan of Management

    Mutawintji Lands Plan of Management

    MUTAWINTJI LANDS PLAN OF MANAGEMENT MUTAWINTJI NATIONAL PARK, NATURE RESERVE AND HISTORIC SITE Mutawintji Board of Management and NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service FRONT COVER: Photographs from top – left to right; Wana Karnu also known as Boomerang Rock; Guided tour of Historic Site main engraving area; Engraving of Emu at the main engraving area of the Historic Site; Visitors on mesh boardwalk at the Historic Site main engraving area; stencil art at the Historic site; Wangarru – yellow-footed rock-wallaby; Board in session in the Old Stone Barn next to the Homestead on the Lands. Photo credits – Sky Kidd, Kim O’Donnell, Pat Laughton, Emily Ward, Adrian Davey, Andrew Ginns and Alan Ginns. Artwork (page 34 and background) by Elizabeth Hunter. Background artwork: Elizabeth Hunter For additional information or any inquiries about this park or this plan of management, contact the NPWS Broken Hill Area Office, PO Box 778, Broken Hill, NSW, 2880 or by telephone on 08 8080 3200. Disclaimer: This publication is for discussion and comment only. Publication indicates the proposals are under consideration and are open for public discussion. Any statements made in this draft publication are made in good faith and do not render the Office of Environment and Heritage liable for any loss or damage. Provisions in the final management plan may not be the same as those in this draft plan. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 © Copyright State of NSW and the Office of Environment and Heritage: Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment.
  • Koch SHLP Presentation

    Koch SHLP Presentation

    Luise Hercus’ contribution to the historical linguistics of Australian languages Harold Koch SHLP, Adelaide, 14 December 2018 Themes of this presentation • Not focus on: • Research history: what languages, where, when • Products of documentation: grammars, dictionaries • Paralinguistic studies: mythology, placenames, etc. • Themes discussed here • Philology: using and assessing early sources • Genetic classification: dialects, subgroup members • Areal features and diffusion • Posited changes • Etymology Organised by 5 subgroups of Pama-Nyungan KULIN subgroup Main References • Hercus, Luise A. 1969. The languages of Victoria: A late survey. 2 vols. Canberra: AIAS. [descriptions of Wembawemba, Wergaia, Madhimadhi] • Hercus, Luise A. 1986. Victorian languages: a late survey. (PL B-77) Canberra: ANU. [= 2nd edn of 1969] • Hercus, Luise A. 1992. Wembawemba dictionary. Canberra: Luise Hercus with the assistance of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. • Blake, Barry. J., Luise Hercus, Stephen Morey & Edward Ryan. 2011. The Mathi group of languages. (PL 628) Canberra: ANU. • Hercus, Luise A. 1974. Texts in Victorian languages. In Christine E. Furby, Luise Hercus & Christine Kilham, Papers in Australian Linguistics No. 7, 13-43. (PL A-37) Canberra: ANU. [Wembawemba, Wergaia, Madhimadhi] • Hercus, Luise. 1978. A note on Narinari. In J.F. Kirton et al, Papers in Australian Linguistics No. 11. (PL A-51) Canberra: ANU. 118-132. • Hercus, Luise A. 1989. Three linguistic studies from far southwestern New South Wales.
  • What's in a Name? a Typological and Phylogenetic

    What's in a Name? a Typological and Phylogenetic

    What’s in a Name? A Typological and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Names of Pama-Nyungan Languages Katherine Rosenberg Advisor: Claire Bowern Submitted to the faculty of the Department of Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts Yale University May 2018 Abstract The naming strategies used by Pama-Nyungan languages to refer to themselves show remarkably similar properties across the family. Names with similar mean- ings and constructions pop up across the family, even in languages that are not particularly closely related, such as Pitta Pitta and Mathi Mathi, which both feature reduplication, or Guwa and Kalaw Kawaw Ya which are both based on their respective words for ‘west.’ This variation within a closed set and similar- ity among related languages suggests the development of language names might be phylogenetic, as other aspects of historical linguistics have been shown to be; if this were the case, it would be possible to reconstruct the naming strategies used by the various ancestors of the Pama-Nyungan languages that are currently known. This is somewhat surprising, as names wouldn’t necessarily operate or develop in the same way as other aspects of language; this thesis seeks to de- termine whether it is indeed possible to analyze the names of Pama-Nyungan languages phylogenetically. In order to attempt such an analysis, however, it is necessary to have a principled classification system capable of capturing both the similarities and differences among various names. While people have noted some similarities and tendencies in Pama-Nyungan names before (McConvell 2006; Sutton 1979), no one has addressed this comprehensively.
  • A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia

    A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia

    “KEEP THAT LANGUAGE GOING!” A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia A consultancy carried out by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, South Australia by Patrick McConvell, Rob Amery, Mary-Anne Gale, Christine Nicholls, Jonathan Nicholls, Lester Irabinna Rigney and Simone Ulalka Tur May 2002 Declaration The authors of this report wish to acknowledge that South Australia’s Indigenous communities remain the custodians for all of the Indigenous languages spoken across the length and breadth of this state. Despite enormous pressures and institutionalised opposition, Indigenous communities have refused to abandon their culture and languages. As a result, South Australia is not a storehouse for linguistic relics but remains the home of vital, living languages. The wisdom of South Australia’s Indigenous communities has been and continues to be foundational for all language programs and projects. In carrying out this project, the Research Team has been strengthened and encouraged by the commitment, insight and linguistic pride of South Australia’s Indigenous communities. All of the recommendations contained in this report are premised on the fundamental right of Indigenous Australians to speak, protect, strengthen and reclaim their traditional languages and to pass them on to future generations. * Within this report, the voices of Indigenous respondents appear in italics. In some places, these voices stand apart from the main body of the report, in other places, they are embedded within sentences. The decision to incorporate direct quotations or close paraphrases of Indigenous respondent’s view is recognition of the importance of foregrounding the perspectives and aspirations of Indigenous communities across the state.
  • Skin, Kin and Clan: the Dynamics of Social Categories in Indigenous

    Skin, Kin and Clan: the Dynamics of Social Categories in Indigenous

    Skin, Kin and Clan THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL CATEGORIES IN INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIA Skin, Kin and Clan THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL CATEGORIES IN INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIA EDITED BY PATRICK MCCONVELL, PIERS KELLY AND SÉBASTIEN LACRAMPE Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au A catalogue record for this book is available from the National Library of Australia ISBN(s): 9781760461638 (print) 9781760461645 (eBook) This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover image Gija Kinship by Shirley Purdie. This edition © 2018 ANU Press Contents List of Figures . vii List of Tables . xi About the Cover . xv Contributors . xvii 1 . Introduction: Revisiting Aboriginal Social Organisation . 1 Patrick McConvell 2 . Evolving Perspectives on Aboriginal Social Organisation: From Mutual Misrecognition to the Kinship Renaissance . 21 Piers Kelly and Patrick McConvell PART I People and Place 3 . Systems in Geography or Geography of Systems? Attempts to Represent Spatial Distributions of Australian Social Organisation . .43 Laurent Dousset 4 . The Sources of Confusion over Social and Territorial Organisation in Western Victoria . .. 85 Raymond Madden 5 . Disputation, Kinship and Land Tenure in Western Arnhem Land . 107 Mark Harvey PART II Social Categories and Their History 6 . Moiety Names in South-Eastern Australia: Distribution and Reconstructed History . 139 Harold Koch, Luise Hercus and Piers Kelly 7 .
  • An Invitation to Contribute to a Forthcoming Series of Articles on ‘Aboriginal Historiography’

    An Invitation to Contribute to a Forthcoming Series of Articles on ‘Aboriginal Historiography’

    An invitation to contribute to a forthcoming series of articles on ‘Aboriginal historiography’ The Editorial Board of Aboriginal History intends publishing a series of articles on the broad theme of ‘Aboriginal historiography’, beginning with Volume 27 (2003). Current debates on the stolen generations, Indigenous labour relations, reconcilia- tion and whether or not ‘genocide’ is an appropriate concept to employ in Australia have led to public discussion of contested approaches to historical interpretation. The Board wishes to encourage a deeper exploration of these historiographical concerns, and that of other historiographical issues. The Editorial Board invites contributions of articles to this Aboriginal historiogra- phy series. Suggested topics are set out below. The list is not exhaustive. Intending contributors should contact the Editor, Ingereth Macfarlane or Deputy Editor, Ian Howie-Willis at Aboriginal History, History, School of Humanities, Austral- ian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. Email addresses: [email protected] or [email protected]. Suggested topics • Definitions: What is ‘Aboriginal history’ — something unique, a subset of Aus- tralian history, or of the history of indigenous peoples generally, or of colonial and post-colonial societies? • Is it possible to produce a typology of ‘schools’ of Aboriginal historiography? If so, what would it be, and which historians could be assigned to its various types? Such a typology would consider certain ‘-isms’ and Aboriginal histori- ography: for instance, what have been the perspectives of classical empiricism, neo-Marxism, post-modernism, neo-conservatism etc on Aboriginal History? • An early dominance of anthropology and anthropologists, seen for instance in the 1964 Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Act, which defined ‘Aborig- inal Studies’ as ‘anthropological research’.
  • South Australia Native Title Claim

    South Australia Native Title Claim

    129°0'E 132°0'E 135°0'E 138°0'E 141°0'E S S ' ' 0 0 ° ° 4 4 2 2 A I L A N O R T H E R N T E R R I T O R Y Q U E E N S L A N D R T S U A Irrwanyere Mt Tjayuwara Unmuru Tjayiwara Dare Native Title Compensation Application Unmuru Native Determination Wangkangurru/Yarluyandi Title Claim Part A Proceeding Eringa De Rose The Wangkangurru/Yarluyandi N Hill Native Title Claim Yandruwandha/Yawarrawarrka Native Title Claim R Eringa De Rose Hill No. 2 and S S ' ' Compensation 0 0 ° Wangkangurru/ ° 7 7 2 Application 2 E Yarluyandi T !( MIN TA BIE Yankunytjatjara/Antakirinja SAD38/2013 Arabana No 2 SAD220/2018 SC2013/001 S Walka Wani Oodnadatta #2 SC2018/002 SAD78/2013 Walka Wani E Oodnadatta SC2013/003 W Dieri Arabana People COOB ER PEDY !( SAD38/2013 Antakirinja Matu-Yankunytjatjara Arabana No 2 SC2013/001 S S S ' ' 0 0 ° ° 0 0 3 3 NSD525/2021 E Malyangapa Part A Native Title Group NC2021/001 L ROXB Y DOWN S !( LEIG H CR EEK !( A Adnyamathanha W People Kokatha People (Part A) !( WOOM ERA Far West Coast H T Gawler Ranges People U !( O CED UN A SAD6011/1998 Adnyamathanha, SAD71/2016 Barngarla Native QUOR N Ngadjuri and Wilyakali !( Far West Title Claim Overlap Claim SAD33/2012 S Coast Sea Claim SC1996/004 SAD6012/1998 SAD76/2021 !( Wilyakali Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim SC2016/001 Nukunu Native SC2012/001 SC2021/002 PORT AU GUSTA Title Claim SC1996/005 SAD228/2019 SAD304/2011 !( STREAKY BAY Wirangu No.
  • Modeling in Historical Linguistics: Trisecting Computational Methods, Speech Communities, and Language Change1

    Modeling in Historical Linguistics: Trisecting Computational Methods, Speech Communities, and Language Change1

    Modeling in Historical Linguistics: Trisecting Computational Methods, Speech Communities, and Language Change1 Claire Bowern, Rice University Introduction §1. Three important issues facing Australian historical linguistics: 1. exceptionality 2. areality (and language contact, and their effects on reconstruc- tion) 3. reconstruction methods Today: State of the art and future directions in Australian prehistory; a look at the issues and some promising methods. §2. Outline: • a brief overview of Australian languages • the basis of claims of exceptionality in Australia • the contribution of areality and language contact and their ef- fects on reconstruction §4. Basis for classification • a case study of computational work in conjunction with the • Curr 1886: common lexical items comparative method. • Schmidt (1919): common lexical items, pronouns: ‘southern’ and ‘northern’ languages (but it’s unclear whether he means §3. Language Background: ‘Australian’ as a family genetic relationships) • 28 Phylic families • O’Grady et al. 1966a,b: Lexicostatistics + informal considera- • c. 250 languages tion of morphology (e.g. Yawuru and Karajarri): note that all • greatest diversity in North subsequent classifications are based on these works. • small and large families • Dixon 2002: Criteria unknown • Bowern and Koch 2004: Comparative method for assorted sub- Pama-Nyungan groups of Pama-Nyungan and Northern families. • 90% of Australia’s land mass Therefore: most of the (sub)groups haven’t been explicitly justified • c. 150 languages with anything more than a basic vocabulary list. This is work for the fu- > • 20 subgroups ture. • many singleton (unclassified) languages 1This work was funded in part by NSF CAREER BCS-0643517 “Pama-Nyungan Reconstruction and the Prehistory of Australia”.
  • Federal Court of Australia

    Federal Court of Australia

    5KIPGFD[#WUV.++ FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Coulthard v State of South Australia [2015] FCA 1379 Citation: Coulthard v State of South Australia [2015] FCA 1379 Parties: VINCENT COULTHARD and OTHERS v STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA and OTHERS (see Schedule 6 for full list of parties) File number: SAD 6001 of 1998 Judge: MANSFIELD J Date of judgment: 8 December 2015 Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – conditions prescribed by ss 87 and 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) satisfied – resolution by agreement of claim for determination of native title Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Cases cited: Far West Coast Native Title Claim v State of South Australia (No 7) [2013] FCA 1285 Munn (for and on behalf of the Gunggari People) v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 Lander v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 427 Adnyamathanha No 1 Native Title Claim Group v The State of South Australia (No 2) [2009] FCA 359 Coulthard v The State of South Australia [2014] FCA 124 Date of hearing: 8 December 2015 Date of last submissions: 27 November 2015 Place: Adelaide Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 60 Counsel for the Applicants: G Harbord with R Bradshaw Solicitor for the Applicants: Johnston Withers 4GVTKGXGFHTQO#WUV.++QP&GEGODGTCV 8GTKH[XGTUKQP 5KIPGFD[#WUV.++ - 2 - Counsel for the First S Hoffmann with S McCaul Respondent: Solicitor for the First Crown Solicitor for the State of South Australia Respondent: Counsel for the South A Beckworth Australian Native Title Services: Solicitor for South Australian

  • Development of a Learner's Grammar for Paakantyi

    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Copyright Service. sydney.edu.au/copyright ! Development!of!a!Learner’s! Grammar!for!Paakantyi! ! Elena!Handlos!Andersen! ! A"thesis"submitted"in"fulfilment"of"the"requirements"for"the"degree"of" Master"of"Arts"(Research)" " " " School!of!Linguistics,!Faculty!of!Arts!and!Social!Sciences! The!University!of!Sydney! 2015! ! ! Acknowledgements! " First"and"foremost,"I"would"like"to"thank"the"Paakantyi"community"for"allowing"me"to"compile"the"
  • Death Procedures

    Death Procedures

    Death Procedures DISCLAIMER The material contained within this document was sourced from a module the Good to Great e-learning (ELMO) system. This material is for reference only. No claim or representation is made or warranty given, express or implied, in relation to any of the material. You use the material entirely at your own risk. The material is provided as point-in-time reference documents. DCJ does not maintain the material and does not undertake to ensure that it is accurate, current, suitable or complete. Where conditions and warranties implied by law cannot be excluded, DCJ limits its liability where it is entitled to do so. Otherwise, DCJ is not liable for any loss or damage (including consequential loss or damage) to any person, however caused (including for negligence), which may arise directly or indirectly from the material or the use of such material. Good to Great e-Learning Module Death Procedures MODULE Good to Great e-Learning Module Death Procedures Support workers ADHC support workers include: • Disability support workers; • Nursing staff; • Line managers. Good to Great e-Learning Module Death Procedures Support services Support services include: • Large Residences; • Specialist Supported Living services; • Assisted Boarding Houses; • Group homes; • Centre-based respite; • In-home accommodation support. Assisted Boarding Houses Assisted Boarding Houses are required to follow these Procedures as specified in the Assisted Boarding Houses Authorisation and Monitoring Manual. Good to Great e-Learning Module Death Procedures Good to Great e-Learning Module Death Procedures Apply first aid and call an ambulance If the person is unresponsive or unusually unwell: • The support worker holding a first aid qualification starts first aid; • Immediately call an ambulance using 000; • Inform the ambulance if the person has a current medically authorised Resuscitation Plan or Advanced Care Directive; • First aid is continued until the ambulance arrives.