DOCSLIB.ORG

SES2 and AP3 Non-Technical Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SES2 and AP3 Non-Technical Summary HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON - WEST MIDLANDS) Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 3 Environmental Statement Non-technical summary High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square September 2015 London E14 5AB T 020 7944 4908 E [email protected] Y5 SES2 and AP3 ES 3.0 SES2 and AP3 ES SES2 and AP3 ES www.gov.uk/hs2 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, London E14 5AB Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd. Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/hs2 Copyright © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2015, except where otherwise stated. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Printed in Great Britain on paper Contents 1. Introduction to the SES2 and 5. Corrections to the main ES 25 the AP3 ES 1 1.1 Purpose of this Non-technical summary 1 6. Summary of residual environmental 1.2 Background to High Speed Two 1 effects for SES2 changes 27 1.3 Terminology used to describe the HS2 scheme 4 1.4 The SES2 and the AP3 ES 5 6.1 Summary of residual environmental effects 27 1.5 Structure of the SES2 and the AP3 ES 7 1.6 Approach to mitigation associated with the Part 2: Additional Provision 3 SES2 and the AP3 ES 10 Environmental Statement 47 1.7 Consultation on the SES2 and the AP3 ES 10 1.8 Assessment approach 10 7. Additional Provision 3 Part 1: Supplementary Environmental Statement 47 Environmental Statement 2 13 7.1 Introduction 47 7.2 Summary of amendments within the AP3 47 2. Introduction to the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 13 8. Summary of residual environmental effects for AP3 amendments 57 3. Updated and new environmental 8.1 Summary of residual environmental effects 57 baseline information 15 4. Changes to the design and construction assumptions that do not require amendments to the Bill 17 4.1 Introduction 17 4.2 Summary of changes to the design and construction assumptions that do not require amendments to the Bill 17 Table 1: Scheme definitions 4 Table 2: Summary of changes to the design and to construction assumptions within CFA1 - Euston station and approach 19 Table 3: Summary of changes to the design and to construction assumptions not requiring a change to the Bill within CFA2 - Camden Town 21 Table 4: Summary of changes to the design and to construction assumptions not requiring a change to the Bill within CFA3 - Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) 23 Table 5: Summary of amendments within CFA1 - Euston station and approach 49 Table 6: Summary of amendments within CFA2 - Camden Town 53 Table 7: Summary of amendments within CFA3 - Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) 55 Figure 1: Phase One route showing the community forum areas with and without AP3 amendments and SES2 design changes and changes to construction assumptions 8 Figure 2: Approximate location of the SES changes to the design and to construction assumptions for Community Forum Area 1 – Euston station and approach 18 Figure 3: Approximate location of the SES changes to the design and to construction assumptions for Community Forum Area 2 – Camden Town 20 Figure 4: Approximate location of the SES changes to the design and to construction assumptions for Community Forum Area 3 – Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) 22 Figure 5: Approximate location of AP3 amendments for Community Forum Area 1 – Euston station and approach 48 Figure 6: Approximate location of AP3 amendments for Community Forum Area 2 – Camden Town 52 Figure 7: Approximate location of AP3 amendments for Community Forum Area 3 – Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) 54 6 | HS2 Phase One SES2 and AP3 ES | Non-technical summary HS2 Phase One SES2 and AP3 ES | Non-technical summary | 1 1. Introduction to the SES2 and the AP3 ES 1.1 Purpose of this Non- 1.2 Background to High Speed Two The first was deposited in Parliament in September 2014 ('AP1'), which focused on technical summary Phase One of High Speed Two (HS2) will provide community forum areas (CFAs) 7 (Colne Valley) This document is the Non-technical summary a new north-south railway between London, to 26 (Washwood Heath to Curzon Street). (NTS) of the Supplementary Environmental Birmingham and the West Midlands. Phase Two The second was deposited in Parliament in July Statement 2 ('SES2') and the Additional Provision of HS2 will comprise new lines between the West 2015 ('AP2'), which focused on CFAs 4 (Kilburn 3 Environmental Statement ('AP3 ES') to the High Midlands, Leeds and Manchester, completing (Brent) to Old Oak Common) to 26. These were Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill ('the what is known as the ‘Y network’. Phase Two is each accompanied by an ES. In addition, an SES Bill'). Its main purpose is to report any new or not the subject of this document. was deposited in July 2015 at the same time as different likely residual significant environmental If enacted by Parliament, the Bill will provide the AP2. The SES focused on CFAs 4 to 26 and effects arising from the updates and changes the powers to construct, operate and maintain described and assessed the consequences of reported in the SES2 and the amendments Phase One of HS2. The Bill was accompanied by new environmental baseline information, reported within the AP3 ES. These new or the main ES. The main ES presented the findings changes to construction assumptions, design different likely residual significant environmental of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) changes that do not require amendments to effects are compared to those contained within for the scheme, outlining the assessment scope the Bill, and corrections to the main ES. the Environmental Statement (ES), which and methodology, identifying likely significant A number of additional amendments to the accompanied the Bill submitted to Parliament in environmental effects, mitigation measures to Bill have been identified for CFAs 1 (Euston November 2013 ('the main ES'), as updated by reduce or avoid significant environmental effects, station and approach) to 3 (Primrose Hill to the Supplementary Environmental Statement and describing residual significant environmental Kilburn (Camden). Those amendments that ('SES') (July 2015). The Additional Provision 2 effects, which remain after all mitigation has require additional powers in the Bill are being ES ('AP2 ES') amendments are also taken into been put in place. promoted via Additional Provision 3 ('AP3'). account where relevant. Since the deposit of the Bill, a number of The associated AP3 ES describes these amendments (i.e. changes that require amendments and reports the associated amendments to the Bill) to the scheme have likely significant environmental effects. been identified. These have been promoted in In addition to these amendments, there are also Parliament through two additional provisions. a number of design changes within CFAs 1 to 3 and other environmental information and 2 | HS2 Phase One SES2 and AP3 ES | Non-technical summary changes to construction assumptions (collectively operation of the conventional station and to The rest of the SES2 covers CFAs 2 to 5. The referred to as ‘SES2 changes’) within CFAs 1 enable over site development (OSD) in order to contents of the relevant CFA reports depend on to 5 (Northolt Corridor) that do not require meet the aspirations of the Euston Area Plan the nature of the new environmental information amendments to the Bill. These are reported in (EAP). This included engagement with the presented for these areas: the SES2. The SES2 and the AP3 ES are separate London Borough of Camden (LBC) and relevant • CFAs 2 and 3: report any new or different environmental statements, but have been train operating companies. This has involved the likely significant environmental effects from produced as combined volumes (see section 1.4 reconsideration of previous options, including a a number of design changes in these areas of this report for further details). level deck option, and the development of new and assess new environmental baseline options in the light of the changed requirements. The most substantial of the SES2 changes relate information, changes to construction This has led to a revised design and construction to Euston station. Following deposit of the Bill assumptions, and updates to transport models; programme for CFA1 that is assessed in the and subsequent discussions with stakeholders, SES2 and the AP3 ES. • CFA4: assesses changes to construction Sir David Higgins undertook a review of the assumptions, updates to transport models, delivery of HS2 Phase One, as set out in HS2 As the design changes within CFA1 are substantial, changes to passenger numbers at Old Oak Plus: a report by David Higgins, in March 2014. the CFA1 report presents a full assessment of Common station as a result of design changes The review questioned whether the Euston the entire revised scheme within the Euston in CFA1 and the removal of the HS1-HS2 proposal was ambitious enough in delivering station and approach area and replaces the CFA1 Link, and a correction to the main ES. There the best value to the local area and the national report from the main ES.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Who Is Council Housing For?
    ‘We thought it was Buckingham Palace’ ‘Homes for Heroes’ Cottage Estates Dover House Estate, Putney, LCC (1919) Cottage Estates Alfred and Ada Salter Wilson Grove Estate, Bermondsey Metropolitan Borough Council (1924) Tenements White City Estate, LCC (1938) Mixed Development Somerford Grove, Hackney Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Neighbourhood Units The Lansbury Estate, Poplar, LCC (1951) Post-War Flats Spa Green Estate, Finsbury Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Berthold Lubetkin Post-War Flats Churchill Gardens Estate, City of Westminster (1951) Architectural Wars Alton East, Roehampton, LCC (1951) Alton West, Roehampton, LCC (1953) Multi-Storey Housing Dawson’s Heights, Southwark Borough Council (1972) Kate Macintosh The Small Estate Chinbrook Estate, Lewisham, LCC (1965) Low-Rise, High Density Lambeth Borough Council Central Hill (1974) Cressingham Gardens (1978) Camden Borough Council Low-Rise, High Density Branch Hill Estate (1978) Alexandra Road Estate (1979) Whittington Estate (1981) Goldsmith Street, Norwich City Council (2018) Passivhaus Mixed Communities ‘The key to successful communities is a good mix of people: tenants, leaseholders and freeholders. The Pepys Estate was a monolithic concentration of public housing and it makes sense to break that up a bit and bring in a different mix of incomes and people with spending power.’ Pat Hayes, LB Lewisham, Director of Regeneration You have castrated communities. You have colonies of low income people, living in houses provided by the local authorities, and you have the higher income groups living in their own colonies. This segregation of the different income groups is a wholly evil thing, from a civilised point of view… We should try to introduce what was always the lovely feature of English and Welsh villages, where the doctor, the grocer, the butcher and the farm labourer all lived in the same street – the living tapestry of a mixed community.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar Week People Commonly
    AN ADDENDUM TO LONDON’S NATURAL HISTORY by R.S.R. Fitter PEOPLE COMMONLY FOUND IN LONDON DEBTS OF GRATITUDE INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW MONDAY – WEST TUESDAY – NORTH WEDNESDAY – SOUTH THURSDAY – EAST FRIDAY – CENTRAL DIRECTORY SEMINAR WEEK 2 2 – 2 8 O C T O B E R STUDIO TOM EMERSON D-ARCH ETH ZURICH MMXVII 2 PEOPLE COMMONLY FOUND IN LONDON* Cyril Amrein +41 79 585 83 34; Céline Bessire +41 79 742 94 91; Lucio Crignola +41 78 858 54 02; Toja Coray +41 79 574 40 69; Vanessa Danuser +41 78 641 10 65; Nick Drofiak +41 75 417 31 95; Boris Gusic +41 79 287 43 60; David Eckert +41 79 574 40 71; Tom Emerson; Zaccaria Exhenry +41 79 265 02 90; Gabriel Fiette +41 78 862 62 64; Kathrin Füglister +41 79 384 12 73; Pascal Grumbacher +41 79 595 60 95; Jonas Heller +41 78 880 12 55; Joel Hösle +41 77 483 57 67; Jens Knöpfel +41 77 424 62 38; Shohei Kunisawa +41 78 704 43 79; Juliette Martin +41 78 818 88 34; Khalil Mdimagh +41 76 416 52 25; Colin Müller +41 79 688 06 08; Alice Müller +41 79 675 40 76; Philip Shelley +44 77 5178 05 81; Tobia Rapelli +41 79 646 37 18; Daria Ryffel +41 79 881 67 70; Florian von Planta +41 79 793 52 55; Andreas Winzeler +41 79 537 63 30; Eric Wuite +41 77 491 61 57; Tian Zhou +41 78 676 96 15 DEBTS OF GRATITUDE Many thanks to Taran Wilkhu & family, Kim Wilkie, Rebecca Law, Robert Youngs, Angela Kidner, Alex Sainsbury, Juergen Teller Studio, James Green, Adam Willis, Paloma Strelitz, Raven Row, Rachel Harlow, Katharina Worf, Matt Atkins, Crispin Kelly, Ashley Wilde-Evans, Stephanie Macdonald, Markus Lähteenmäki, Matthew Hearn.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Draft Statement
    DRAFT PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Non-Technical Summary 2 | HS2 Phase One Draft Environmental Statement | Non-Technical Summary High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her To order further copies contact: 2nd Floor, Eland House, Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2013, except where Bressenden Place, otherwise stated DfT Publications London SW1E 5DU Tel: 0300 123 1102 Copyright in the typographical arrangement Web: www.dft.gov.uk/orderingpublications Telephone 020 7944 4908 rests with the Crown. Product code : ES/01 General email enquiries [email protected] You may re-use this information (not including Website: www.hs2.org.uk logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of Printed in Great Britain on paper containing the Open Government Licence. To view this at least 75% recycled fibre. licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. ENGINE FOR GROWTH HS2 Phase One Draft Environmental Statement | Non-Technical Summary Foreword The draft Environmental Statement HS2 Ltd is consulting on the draft ES in order to Proposed changes to the January 2012 scheme When the Government submits a hybrid Bill to inform interested parties on the design of the scheme Since the Secretary of State published the proposed Parliament in late 2013, seeking powers to build a and the likely environmental effects with a view to route in January 2012, work has continued to refine new high speed railway between London and the completion of the formal ES.
    [Show full text]
  • MOSSLEY STALYBRIDGE Broadbottom Hollingworth
    Tameside.qxp_Tameside 08/07/2019 12:00 Page 1 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ST MA A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lydgate 0 D GI RY'S R S S D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A BB RIV K T O E L 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 8 9 SY C R C KES L A O 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 E 8 8 . N Y LAN IT L E E C 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 L 3 3 RN M . HO K R MANCHESTE Hollins 404T000 D R ROAD The Rough 404000 P A A E O Dacres O N HOLM R FIRTH ROAD R A T L E E R D D ANE L N L I KIL O BAN LD O N K O S LAN A A E H R Waterside D - L I E E Slate - Z V T L E D I I L A R R A E Pit Moss F O W R W D U S Y E N E L R D C S A E S D Dove Stone R O Reservoir L M A N E D Q OA R R U E I T C S K E H R C Saddleworth O IN N SPR G A V A A M Moor D M L D I E L A L Quick V O D I R E R Roaches E W I Lower Hollins Plantation E V V I G E R D D E K S C D I N T T U A Q C C L I I R NE R R O A L L Greave T O E T E TAK Dove Stone E M S IN S S I I Quick Edge R Moss D D O A LOWER HEY LA.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic 4: the Modern House and Housing
    Domestic 4: Modern Houses and Housing Listing Selection Guide Summary Historic England’s twenty listing selection guides help to define which historic buildings are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. Listing has been in place since 1947 and operates under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. If a building is felt to meet the necessary standards, it is added to the List. This decision is taken by the Government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). These selection guides were originally produced by English Heritage in 2011: slightly revised versions are now being published by its successor body, Historic England. The DCMS‘ Principles of Selection for Listing Buildings set out the over-arching criteria of special architectural or historic interest required for listing and the guides provide more detail of relevant considerations for determining such interest for particular building types. See https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/principles-of- selection-for-listing-buildings. Each guide falls into two halves. The first defines the types of structures included in it, before going on to give a brisk overview of their characteristics and how these developed through time, with notice of the main architects and representative examples of buildings. The second half of the guide sets out the particular tests in terms of its architectural or historic interest a building has to meet if it is to be listed. A select bibliography gives suggestions for further reading. This guide, one of four on different types of Domestic Buildings, covers modern houses and housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromley (Lewisham)
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF GREATER LONDON, THE LONDON BOROUGHS AND THE CITY OF LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY Boundary with : LEWISHAM LB LAMBETH DARTFORD BROM -Y SEVENOAKS TANDRIDGE REPORT NO. 641 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 641 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN MR K F J ENNALS CB MEMBERS MR G R PRENTICE MRS H R V SARKANY MR C W SMITH PROFESSOR K YOUNG RT HON MICHAEL HOWARD HP QC SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF GREATER LONDON, THE LONDON BOROUGHS AND THE CITY OF LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY AND ITS BOUNDARY WITH THE LONDON BOROUGH OF LEWISHAM COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT INTRODUCTION 1. This report contains our final proposals for the London Borough of Bromley's boundary with the London Borough of Lewisham. In the main, we have proposed limited changes to remove anomalies, for example, where properties are divided by the boundary. However, we have also sought to unite areas of continuous development where this has appeared to be in the interests of effective and convenient local government. Our report explains how we arrived at our proposals. 2. On 1 April 1987 we announced the start of a review of Greater London, the London boroughs and the City of London, as part of the programme of reviews we are required to undertake by virtue of section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. We wrote to each of the local authorities concerned. 3. Copies of our letter were sent to the adjoining London boroughs; the appropriate county, district and parish councils bordering Greater London; the local authority associations; Members of Parliament with constituency interests; and the headquarters of the main political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Flip Magazine Neighbourhood Issue
    f or LONDON INDEPENDENTPHOTOGRAPHY or LONDON 31 NEIGHBOURHOOD £4 Published by for LONDON INDEPENDENT PHOTOGRAPHY for LONDON INDEPENDENT PHOTOGRAPHY Satellite Groups Small informal groups meet approximately once a month to discuss each others’ work, plan exhibitions and just share ideas. As groups are independently organised by members, the structure, content, times, dates, and frequency of meetings are left to the individual groups to decide for themselves. Contact an organiser for more details about a specific group: Central London Hugh Look - [email protected] Crossing Lines Editor’s note 4 John Levett - [email protected] £4 Crouch End Letter from Krakow David Gibson 4 Eva Turrell - [email protected] Dulwich/Sydenham NEIGHBOURHOOD MY WAY 31 Yoke Matze - [email protected] #31 NEIGHBOURHOOD, Summer 2015 Ealing Cover image: Emma Marshall Robin Segulem - [email protected] Bello Market – My Hood Benjamin Szabo 6 Back image: Tom Gifford Greenwich John Levett - [email protected] 11 Stoke Newington Portraits Emma Marshall 8 London Independent Photography is a community organisation Kingston upon Thames of photographers from different backgrounds and levels of Matthew Green - [email protected] expertise who wish to develop their individual approach to Putney Unfinished Houses Raphael Schutz-Weissmann 10 photography. The group was founded in 1987 as an informal Andrew Wilson - [email protected] gathering of like-minded photographers, and has since grown Queens Park to over 600 members. Not-for-profit and run by member Simon Butcher - [email protected] FEATURES volunteers, LIP comes together to offer a programme of Ruislip Metroland workshops and talks, and to produce an annual group exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • BRUTAL LONDON Robin Hood Gardens CONSTRUCT YOUR OWN CONCRETE CAPITAL Space House ZUPAGRAFIKA, with CONTRIBUTIONS by JOHN GRINDROD and PETER CHADWICK
    Appealing to fans of architecture, this ingeniously designed book lets you build replicas of some of London’s iconic post-war concrete structures while learning about their place in the city’s architectural history. Featured buildings: Alexandra Road Estate Alton Estate Aylesbury Estate Balfron Tower Barbican Estate Ledbury Estate National Theatre BRUTAL LONDON Robin Hood Gardens CONSTRUCT YOUR OWN CONCRETE CAPITAL Space House ZUPAGRAFIKA, WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY JOHN GRINDROD AND PETER CHADWICK In this fun and intellectually stimulating book, readers can recreate a number of London’s most renowned Brutalist buildings. Opening with an informative history of the origins and philosophy of Brutalist architecture, the book then focuses on 9 buildings, including the Barbican Estate, Robin Hood Gardens, Balfron Tower and the National Theatre. The first part of the book looks at the significance of each of these buildings, with a short chapter on each, complete with texts and images. The second part of the book consists of a series of 9 pre-cut and folded buildings, printed on heavy card stock, that readers can detach and construct with easy-to- follow instructions. At once fun and informative, this unique book offers a challenging and entertaining approach to architecture. ZUPAGRAFIKA is a creative design studio based in Poland, founded by David Navarro and Martyna Sobecka. The studio originates, illustrates, designs, and publishes their own award-winning, architecture-related objects. JOHN GRINDROD is an author and journalist. He wrote the book Concretopia: A Journey Around the Rebuilding of Postwar Britain and has contributed to The Guardian, the Financial Times, C20 magazine and The Modernist.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories in the Sky VR: Immersive Storytelling, Heritage-Led Stakeholder Engagement, and Community Fatigue
    Stories in the Sky VR: Immersive storytelling, heritage-led stakeholder engagement, and community fatigue Joseph Thomas Empsall Masters by Research University of York Archaeology September 2020 Abstract Stories in the Sky VR was a prototype immersive storytelling experience focusing on Park Hill, Sheffield. The project explored the way that immersive technologies can be used as part of heritage-led community engagement, as a means to articulate intangible heritage. Park Hill represents one of the most divisive buildings in the country; it was regarded as a success in the 1960s, saw a period of dramatic decline in the 1980s and 1990s, and is currently being regenerated by Urban Splash, following the estate’s Grade II* listing in 1998. Through its redevelopment, Park Hill has not only seen an overhaul in its design, but also in the community that now calls the estate home, having transitioned from council estate to gentrified flats. Park Hill represented an ideal testing ground to investigate the potential of immersive technologies, with storytelling embedded in these “flats of the future” since their inception. While the listing details the estate’s value derives from its innovative design, Park Hill also has strong roots in the intangible, through its sense of enduring community, identities, and experiences. Stories in the Sky VR attempted to implement a “bottom-up” approach, giving the stakeholders more control over the narrative and nature of the immersive experience. Ultimately, this proved difficult to achieve, with the fatigue of interviews and tourism having soured large-scale interest in these types of projects. In place of new interviews, previously recorded oral testimonies were utilised to shape the focus of the immersive experience.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY Framework Travel Plan
    Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY Framework Travel Plan 70043297-FTP APRIL 2018 PUBLIC Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY Framework Travel Plan TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70043297 OUR REF. NO. 70043297-FTP DATE: APRIL 2018 WSP The Victoria 150-182 The Quays Salford, Manchester M50 3SP Phone: +44 161 886 2400 Fax: +44 161 886 2401 WSP.com QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Final Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Draft Final Date Prepared by D Skinner D Skinner Signature Checked by A Purrier A Purrier Signature Authorised by I Hughes I Hughes Signature Project number 70043297 Report number 1 File reference 70043297-FTP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-FTP April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW 1 1.2 SITE LOCATION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE TRAVEL PLAN 2 1.4 TYPE OF TRAVEL PLAN 2 1.5 TRAVEL PLAN STRUCTURE 2 2 POLICY FRAMEWORK 3 2.1 OVERVIEW 3 2.2 NATIONAL POLICY 3 National Planning Policy Framework (DCLG, 2012) 3 Creating Growth, Cutting Carbon: Making Sustainable Local Transport Happen (DfT, 2011) 3 Smarter Choices – Changing the Way we Travel (DfT, 2004) 3 Good Practice Guidelines: Delivering Travel Plans Through The Planning Process (DfT, 2009) 3 2.3 LOCAL POLICY 4 High Peak Local Plan (HPBC, 2016) 4 Derbyshire Local Transport Plan 2011 – 2026 (DCC, 2011) 4 Derbyshire INFRASTRUCTURE Plan (DCC, 2013) 4 2.4 SUMMARY 5 3 BENEFITS OF A TRAVEL PLAN 6 The Developer
    [Show full text]
  • Between City and Home Spaces of Transition in London Postwar Housing
    Frontiers of Architectural Research (2018) 7, 257–275 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Frontiers of Architectural Research www.keaipublishing.com/foar RESEARCH ARTICLE Between city and home: Spaces of transition in London Postwar Housing Gerardo Semprebona,b,n, Wenjun Mac aDepartment of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China bDepartment of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy cDepartment of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Received 8 January 2018; received in revised form 11 May 2018; accepted 31 May 2018 KEYWORDS Abstract London; In the period between the idealistic vision of the 'Reshaping society' and Thatcherism, in the so- Housing; called 'Swinging London', the second wave of modernism is facing the demands and the Space of relation; quantities of bombed cities. The architects of that season, moved by political ideals and Transition interpreting the cultural ferment, have been responsible for shaping the city on the collective dreams and aspirations of the society and for forging the identity of London as unique experience in the international panorama. This paper focuses on the spatial relations between city and home, how they raised in that specific historical context, in which form they realized, and what are the architectural implications for current design culture. The methodology, based both on the literature review and on the graphic comparison of six case-studies, is articulated in four steps. First, the six case-studies are selected according to specific criteria. Second, the sociohistorical background is reported. Third, the cases are shortly introduced using text descriptions and graphic tools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appendices
    THE APPENDICES Appendix A: The Consultation Findings Appendix B: The Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Tameside Appendix C: Tameside Homelessness Review Appendix D: Linkages with Key Strategies Appendix E: Housing Needs Assessment 1 Appendix A: Consultation Responses Topic Theme Comment Causes of homelessness in Tameside Finance Lack of money A lot more people not coping financially Unemployment Debt People getting used to a certain standard of living that they cannot sustain Causes of homelessness in Tameside Properties/Accommodation National housing shortage, particularly social housing Causes of homelessness in Tameside Age Homeless people tend to be under 35 Hospital discharges picks up people over 55, so they do not get sent straight from the hospital to Housing Advice Causes of homelessness in Tameside Properties/Accommodation 8 million people on housing waiting list Causes of homelessness in Tameside Properties/Accommodation Lack of housing options Causes of homelessness in Tameside Properties/Accommodation ‘Affordable’ housing is not affordable People cannot afford to get in housing if not in work Bedroom tax stops people from moving into available accommodation 2 Topic Theme Comment Causes of homelessness in Tameside Breakdown in Family Breakdown of family Relations relationships Causes of homelessness in Tameside Substance Misuse Lifestyle ‘choices’ such as drugs, alcohol Causes of homelessness in Tameside Mental Health Mental health issues/problems Causes of homelessness in Tameside Combination of Factors
    [Show full text]