DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Draft Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Draft Statement DRAFT PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Non-Technical Summary 2 | HS2 Phase One Draft Environmental Statement | Non-Technical Summary High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her To order further copies contact: 2nd Floor, Eland House, Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2013, except where Bressenden Place, otherwise stated DfT Publications London SW1E 5DU Tel: 0300 123 1102 Copyright in the typographical arrangement Web: www.dft.gov.uk/orderingpublications Telephone 020 7944 4908 rests with the Crown. Product code : ES/01 General email enquiries [email protected] You may re-use this information (not including Website: www.hs2.org.uk logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of Printed in Great Britain on paper containing the Open Government Licence. To view this at least 75% recycled fibre. licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. ENGINE FOR GROWTH HS2 Phase One Draft Environmental Statement | Non-Technical Summary Foreword The draft Environmental Statement HS2 Ltd is consulting on the draft ES in order to Proposed changes to the January 2012 scheme When the Government submits a hybrid Bill to inform interested parties on the design of the scheme Since the Secretary of State published the proposed Parliament in late 2013, seeking powers to build a and the likely environmental effects with a view to route in January 2012, work has continued to refine new high speed railway between London and the completion of the formal ES. The draft ES is based the scheme to reduce its environmental effects, to West Midlands (referred to as Phase One of HS2), on the best information available to date and the resolve some previously unexplored engineering it will be accompanied by a formal Environmental assessment of effects and conclusions will be updated issues and to improve value for money. This has Statement (ES). The ES is being prepared in to reflect further work and decisions between now resulted in numerous minor changes and fourteen accordance with European legislation and and when the hybrid Bill is deposited. more significant design changes. The minor changes Government guidance. It will provide Members of have been incorporated into the scheme, but the Parliament with information on all the significant This consultation Secretary of State is consulting publically on the environmental effects likely to result from HS2 Consultation on the draft ES is not a statutory fourteen more significant design changes before Phase One so that they can be taken into account requirement but HS2 Ltd recognises the importance deciding whether to incorporate them into the before Parliament decides whether or not of ensuring widespread engagement on the hybrid Bill scheme. to grant the powers to build the railway. scheme and wishes to offer everybody with an interest the opportunity to: That consultation is taking place in parallel with The ES will set out: • Understand what the likely significant consultation on the draft ES. Each of the fourteen • A description of the scheme and environmental effects would be and proposed changes to the design are described in the how it was developed; what mitigation is proposed; and Design Refinement Consultation document. The draft ES incorporates both the fourteen proposed • The alternatives that were considered; • Comment on the assessment undertaken to design changes and minor amendments made since • Assessment of the likely adverse and beneficial date and the conclusions reached so far. January 2012. In the event that following public environmental effects of the scheme; and This consultation may identify issues that result in consultation the Secretary of State decides not • Proposed mitigation measures to manage or changes being made to the design of the scheme or to include one or more of the fourteen proposed reduce likely significant adverse effects. the proposals to mitigate significant adverse effects. changes in the hybrid Bill scheme, his decision will be As part of the mitigation proposals a Code of These changes will be included in the ES to reflected in the formal ES. Construction Practice will be included in the ES be submitted to Parliament. documents. It sets out the requirements and Once the hybrid Bill is deposited, there will be procedures to protect residents, businesses and the public consultation on the formal ES as part of environment adjacent to the construction sites. the Parliamentary process. HS2 Phase One Draft Environmental Statement | Non-Technical Summary Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Approach to the environment 2 1.2 Consultation and engagement 3 2. Background to HS2 5 2.1 Development of HS2 5 2.2 The need for HS2 5 2.3 Enhancing capacity 6 2.4 An engine for growth 6 2.5 Controlling greenhouse gas emissions 7 2.6 Managing local effects 7 3. Description of the scheme 9 3.1 Stations 9 3.2 The route 9 3.3 Other components of the scheme 10 4. Construction and operation of the scheme 13 4.1 Construction programme 13 4.2 Construction management 13 4.3 Services and 0perating characteristics 14 4.4 Maintenance 15 4.5 Electromagnetic compatibility 15 This document has been prepared by Arup and URS for HS2. May 2013 HS2 Phase One Draft Environmental Statement | Non-Technical Summary 5. Environmental impact assessment 17 7.15 Greatworth to Lower Boddington 72 7.16 Ladbroke and Southam 75 7.17 Offchurch and Cubbington 78 6. Strategic and route-wide alternatives 19 7.18 Stoneleigh, Kenilworth and Burton Green 81 7.19 Coleshill Junction 84 6.1 Introduction 19 7.20 Curdworth to Middleton 87 6.2 Strategic alternatives to high speed rail 19 7.21 Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford 90 6.3 Route-wide alternatives 21 7.22 Whittington to Handsacre 93 6.4 Local alternatives considered prior to January 2012 25 7.23 Balsall Common and Hampton in Arden 96 7.24 Birmingham Interchange and Chelmsley Wood 99 7. Summary of environmental effects by area 27 7.25 Castle Bromwich and Bromford 102 7.26 Washwood Heath to Curzon Street 105 7.1 Euston 28 7.2 Camden Town and HS1 Link 32 7.3 Primrose Hill to Kilburn (Camden) 35 8 Summary of route-wide environmental effects 111 7.4 Kilburn (Brent) to Old Oak Common 38 8.1 Introduction 111 7.5 Northolt Corridor 41 8.2 Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty 111 7.6 South Ruislip to Ickenham 44 8.3 Agriculture, forestry and soils 112 7.7 Colne Valley 47 8.4 Climate 113 7.8 The Chalfonts and Amersham 51 8.5 Cultural heritage 113 7.9 Central Chilterns 54 8.6 Ecology 113 7.10 Dunsmore, Wendover and Halton 57 8.7 Socio-economics 114 7.11 Stoke Mandeville and Aylesbury 60 8.8 Traffic and transport 115 7.12 Waddesdon and Quainton 63 8.9 Waste and material resources 116 7.13 Calvert, Steeple Claydon, Twyford and Chetwode 66 7.14 Newton Purcell to Brackley 69 HS2 Phase One Draft Environmental Statement | Non-Technical Summary | 1 1. Introduction High Speed Two (HS2) is a new high speed railway The draft ES has been produced for consultation Figure 1: The proposed HS2 network and connections proposed by Government to connect major cities in during Spring 2013 and comprises a series of to existing railways Britain. When completed, it would provide a new documents, namely: link between London, the Midlands and the North. • A non-technical summary (NTS) It would increase the capacity of the rail network to of the draft ES (this document); meet future demand and bring people and businesses • Volume 1 - An introduction to the closer together. draft ES and the scheme; and It is proposed that HS2 be developed in two phases. • Volume 2 - Twenty-six community forum area (CFA) reports and a route-wide effects Glasgow Phase One would link London, Birmingham and the Edinburgh report (Report 27) together with maps and West Coast Main Line north of Lichfield, extending for WEST COAST MAIN LINE approximately 230km (143 miles). Phase Two would photomontages, which provide a summary of the assessment of environmental effects. in due course extend to Leeds and to Manchester, The community forums have been established Carlisle Newcastle with connections onto the West Coast Main Line to inform local people about the scheme, to EAST COAST MAIN LINE south of Wigan and the East Coast Main Line south of consider local issues and discuss potential York. The proposed HS2 network and connections to ways to avoid or reduce effects and to existing railways is shown in Figure 1. identify possible community benefits. York Preston Leeds Wigan Development of Phase Two is continuing and will be Manchester This draft ES makes reference to the scope Liverpool Sheffield Meadowhall Warrington Manchester Airport subject to separate consultations, environmental and methodology report and the draft Code of Runcorn PHASE TWO assessment process, ES and a hybrid Bill at a later Crewe Construction Practice. These documents both provide East Midlands Hub Stafford date. However, where necessary the environmental background information to the draft ES and will assessment for Phase One includes consideration of be part of the formal ES. They can be found on the Birmingham Birmingham Interchange PHASE ONE the effects of operating both phases of HS2. following website: www.hs2.org.uk The draft ES for Phase One sets out the scheme and Following this consultation and continuing Old Oak Common its likely significant environmental effects based on London development of the design, the assessment will (Euston) Heathrow HS1 the current level of understanding.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coventry Canal
    PDF download Boaters' Guides Welcome A note on dimensions data Key to facilities These guides list information we currently The data contained in this guide is our Winding hole (length specified) have on our facilities and stoppages. We estimate of the dimensions of our cannot guarantee complete accuracy and waterways based upon local knowledge Winding hole (full length) so you should also check locally in and expertise. Whilst we anticipate that this advance for anything that is particularly data is reasonably accurate, we cannot vital to your journey. guarantee its precision. Therefore, this Visitor mooring data should only be used as a helpful guide and you should always use your own Information and office judgement taking into account local circumstances at any particular time. Dock and/or slipway Slipway only Services and facilities Water point only Downloaded from canalrivertrust.org.uk on 27 March 2017 1 Trent & Mersey Canal Coventry Canal Trent & Mersey Canal Coventry Canal Fazeley Fradley Coventry Canal 90 Alrewas Croxall Coton in the Elms 18 Overseal 20: Wood End Lock 15: Hunts Lock Fazeley 17 50 16: Keepers Lock 14 Fradley Junction 10 17: Junction Lock 12 16 51: Junction Bridge 88 Edingale13 76 Lullington Fazeley Junction 11 52 15 1 86: Streethay Bridge 19: Shadehouse Lock 84 Whittington 82 Chilcote Huddlesford Junction Elford Haselour Clifton Campville 80 2 78 3 Coventry Canal Thorpe Constantine Coventry Canal Newton Wigginton Newton Regis Austrey 5 4 66 64 8 7 68 Shuttington 70 56 13: Glascote Bottom Lock Glascote 6 Coventry Canal Bitterscote 74 12: Glascote Top Lock 54 52 Weeford Tamworth Fazeley 9 50 Coventry Canal Opening times November 2016 – 31 March Centre and the Barclaycard Arena for the British 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Council Housing For?
    ‘We thought it was Buckingham Palace’ ‘Homes for Heroes’ Cottage Estates Dover House Estate, Putney, LCC (1919) Cottage Estates Alfred and Ada Salter Wilson Grove Estate, Bermondsey Metropolitan Borough Council (1924) Tenements White City Estate, LCC (1938) Mixed Development Somerford Grove, Hackney Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Neighbourhood Units The Lansbury Estate, Poplar, LCC (1951) Post-War Flats Spa Green Estate, Finsbury Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Berthold Lubetkin Post-War Flats Churchill Gardens Estate, City of Westminster (1951) Architectural Wars Alton East, Roehampton, LCC (1951) Alton West, Roehampton, LCC (1953) Multi-Storey Housing Dawson’s Heights, Southwark Borough Council (1972) Kate Macintosh The Small Estate Chinbrook Estate, Lewisham, LCC (1965) Low-Rise, High Density Lambeth Borough Council Central Hill (1974) Cressingham Gardens (1978) Camden Borough Council Low-Rise, High Density Branch Hill Estate (1978) Alexandra Road Estate (1979) Whittington Estate (1981) Goldsmith Street, Norwich City Council (2018) Passivhaus Mixed Communities ‘The key to successful communities is a good mix of people: tenants, leaseholders and freeholders. The Pepys Estate was a monolithic concentration of public housing and it makes sense to break that up a bit and bring in a different mix of incomes and people with spending power.’ Pat Hayes, LB Lewisham, Director of Regeneration You have castrated communities. You have colonies of low income people, living in houses provided by the local authorities, and you have the higher income groups living in their own colonies. This segregation of the different income groups is a wholly evil thing, from a civilised point of view… We should try to introduce what was always the lovely feature of English and Welsh villages, where the doctor, the grocer, the butcher and the farm labourer all lived in the same street – the living tapestry of a mixed community.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar Week People Commonly
    AN ADDENDUM TO LONDON’S NATURAL HISTORY by R.S.R. Fitter PEOPLE COMMONLY FOUND IN LONDON DEBTS OF GRATITUDE INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW MONDAY – WEST TUESDAY – NORTH WEDNESDAY – SOUTH THURSDAY – EAST FRIDAY – CENTRAL DIRECTORY SEMINAR WEEK 2 2 – 2 8 O C T O B E R STUDIO TOM EMERSON D-ARCH ETH ZURICH MMXVII 2 PEOPLE COMMONLY FOUND IN LONDON* Cyril Amrein +41 79 585 83 34; Céline Bessire +41 79 742 94 91; Lucio Crignola +41 78 858 54 02; Toja Coray +41 79 574 40 69; Vanessa Danuser +41 78 641 10 65; Nick Drofiak +41 75 417 31 95; Boris Gusic +41 79 287 43 60; David Eckert +41 79 574 40 71; Tom Emerson; Zaccaria Exhenry +41 79 265 02 90; Gabriel Fiette +41 78 862 62 64; Kathrin Füglister +41 79 384 12 73; Pascal Grumbacher +41 79 595 60 95; Jonas Heller +41 78 880 12 55; Joel Hösle +41 77 483 57 67; Jens Knöpfel +41 77 424 62 38; Shohei Kunisawa +41 78 704 43 79; Juliette Martin +41 78 818 88 34; Khalil Mdimagh +41 76 416 52 25; Colin Müller +41 79 688 06 08; Alice Müller +41 79 675 40 76; Philip Shelley +44 77 5178 05 81; Tobia Rapelli +41 79 646 37 18; Daria Ryffel +41 79 881 67 70; Florian von Planta +41 79 793 52 55; Andreas Winzeler +41 79 537 63 30; Eric Wuite +41 77 491 61 57; Tian Zhou +41 78 676 96 15 DEBTS OF GRATITUDE Many thanks to Taran Wilkhu & family, Kim Wilkie, Rebecca Law, Robert Youngs, Angela Kidner, Alex Sainsbury, Juergen Teller Studio, James Green, Adam Willis, Paloma Strelitz, Raven Row, Rachel Harlow, Katharina Worf, Matt Atkins, Crispin Kelly, Ashley Wilde-Evans, Stephanie Macdonald, Markus Lähteenmäki, Matthew Hearn.
    [Show full text]
  • Download an Application Form from Our Website Or Write to Mavis Moore, 88 Spring Lane, Whittington, Lichfield WS14 9NA
    The Magazine of the Lichfield & Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust Issue 68 Summer 2011 With Mayoral approval, Max Sinclair, President of the Droitwich Canals Trust unveils a plaque in Vines Park to honour volunteer achievement over 30 years at the formal reopening of the Droitwich Barge and Junction Canals, 1-July-2011 (see report) TEL:01543 414808 MOBILE:07860 729522 FAX:01543 414770 www.streethaywharf.co.uk 7-DAY CALL OUT SERVICE GEN SETS FITTED DIESEL AND SOLID FUEL STOVES FITTED BOTTOM BLACKING REPAINTING AND SIGNWRITING NEW BOATS FULL & PART FIT-OUT SUPPLIED ALL MECHANICAL WORK FULL CHANDLERY STRETCHING AND REBOTTOMING CORGI REG. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ALL STEEL WORK AND TANKS Support the boat yard on the “Lichfield Ring” Boat Transport, England, Europe !Cranage Arranged Site Surveys ! Complete Service for DIY ! Repairs Boat Hire !Boat Fitting !Diesel Pump Out ! Mooring ! Boat Sales ! Laundry Trent & Mersey Canal V.A.T No. 203321527 Cut Both Ways 2 Summer 2011 CHAIRMAN’S COLUMN Canal restoration has reached an interesting and challenging stage after a relatively steady progression which lasted about half a century. We moved from the 1950’s where the challenge was to keep open and refresh the waterways which were still open after the post war and post nationalisation neglect. We have to remember that canals which we now consider the backbone of the system such as the Staffordshire and Worcestershire were under serious threat in the late 1950s. Then came the first wave of re-openings with the Stourbridge and the Stratford leading the charge with some triumphant re-openings honoured by royalty.
    [Show full text]
  • MOSSLEY STALYBRIDGE Broadbottom Hollingworth
    Tameside.qxp_Tameside 08/07/2019 12:00 Page 1 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ST MA A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lydgate 0 D GI RY'S R S S D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A BB RIV K T O E L 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 8 9 SY C R C KES L A O 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 E 8 8 . N Y LAN IT L E E C 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 L 3 3 RN M . HO K R MANCHESTE Hollins 404T000 D R ROAD The Rough 404000 P A A E O Dacres O N HOLM R FIRTH ROAD R A T L E E R D D ANE L N L I KIL O BAN LD O N K O S LAN A A E H R Waterside D - L I E E Slate - Z V T L E D I I L A R R A E Pit Moss F O W R W D U S Y E N E L R D C S A E S D Dove Stone R O Reservoir L M A N E D Q OA R R U E I T C S K E H R C Saddleworth O IN N SPR G A V A A M Moor D M L D I E L A L Quick V O D I R E R Roaches E W I Lower Hollins Plantation E V V I G E R D D E K S C D I N T T U A Q C C L I I R NE R R O A L L Greave T O E T E TAK Dove Stone E M S IN S S I I Quick Edge R Moss D D O A LOWER HEY LA.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic 4: the Modern House and Housing
    Domestic 4: Modern Houses and Housing Listing Selection Guide Summary Historic England’s twenty listing selection guides help to define which historic buildings are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. Listing has been in place since 1947 and operates under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. If a building is felt to meet the necessary standards, it is added to the List. This decision is taken by the Government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). These selection guides were originally produced by English Heritage in 2011: slightly revised versions are now being published by its successor body, Historic England. The DCMS‘ Principles of Selection for Listing Buildings set out the over-arching criteria of special architectural or historic interest required for listing and the guides provide more detail of relevant considerations for determining such interest for particular building types. See https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/principles-of- selection-for-listing-buildings. Each guide falls into two halves. The first defines the types of structures included in it, before going on to give a brisk overview of their characteristics and how these developed through time, with notice of the main architects and representative examples of buildings. The second half of the guide sets out the particular tests in terms of its architectural or historic interest a building has to meet if it is to be listed. A select bibliography gives suggestions for further reading. This guide, one of four on different types of Domestic Buildings, covers modern houses and housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromley (Lewisham)
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF GREATER LONDON, THE LONDON BOROUGHS AND THE CITY OF LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY Boundary with : LEWISHAM LB LAMBETH DARTFORD BROM -Y SEVENOAKS TANDRIDGE REPORT NO. 641 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 641 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN MR K F J ENNALS CB MEMBERS MR G R PRENTICE MRS H R V SARKANY MR C W SMITH PROFESSOR K YOUNG RT HON MICHAEL HOWARD HP QC SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF GREATER LONDON, THE LONDON BOROUGHS AND THE CITY OF LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY AND ITS BOUNDARY WITH THE LONDON BOROUGH OF LEWISHAM COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT INTRODUCTION 1. This report contains our final proposals for the London Borough of Bromley's boundary with the London Borough of Lewisham. In the main, we have proposed limited changes to remove anomalies, for example, where properties are divided by the boundary. However, we have also sought to unite areas of continuous development where this has appeared to be in the interests of effective and convenient local government. Our report explains how we arrived at our proposals. 2. On 1 April 1987 we announced the start of a review of Greater London, the London boroughs and the City of London, as part of the programme of reviews we are required to undertake by virtue of section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. We wrote to each of the local authorities concerned. 3. Copies of our letter were sent to the adjoining London boroughs; the appropriate county, district and parish councils bordering Greater London; the local authority associations; Members of Parliament with constituency interests; and the headquarters of the main political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Site SHA4 Whittington Heritage Impact Assessment
    Site SHA4 Whittington Heritage Impact Assessment Client: Date: Lichfield District Council December 2020 Site SHA4 Whittington Heritage Impact Assessment Project Details Client: Lichfield District Council Project Number: F1618 Address: Lichfield District Council 20 Frog Lane Lichfield WS13 6HS Quality Assurance – Approval Status Issue: 1.2 Date: 02/12/20 Prepared By: Megan Lloyd-Regan and Richard Havis Checked By: Hannah Rae Approved By: Tim Murphy Prepared by: Place Services Essex County Council County Hall, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 1QH T: +44 (0)333 013 6840 E: [email protected] www.placeservices.co.uk @PlaceServices Page 3 Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Place Services with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at its own risk. Copyright This report may contain material that is non-Place Services copyright (e.g. Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, Historic England), or the intellectual property of third parties, which Place Services is able to provide for limited reproduction under the terms of our own copyright licences or permissions, but for which copyright itself is not transferable by Place Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Flip Magazine Neighbourhood Issue
    f or LONDON INDEPENDENTPHOTOGRAPHY or LONDON 31 NEIGHBOURHOOD £4 Published by for LONDON INDEPENDENT PHOTOGRAPHY for LONDON INDEPENDENT PHOTOGRAPHY Satellite Groups Small informal groups meet approximately once a month to discuss each others’ work, plan exhibitions and just share ideas. As groups are independently organised by members, the structure, content, times, dates, and frequency of meetings are left to the individual groups to decide for themselves. Contact an organiser for more details about a specific group: Central London Hugh Look - [email protected] Crossing Lines Editor’s note 4 John Levett - [email protected] £4 Crouch End Letter from Krakow David Gibson 4 Eva Turrell - [email protected] Dulwich/Sydenham NEIGHBOURHOOD MY WAY 31 Yoke Matze - [email protected] #31 NEIGHBOURHOOD, Summer 2015 Ealing Cover image: Emma Marshall Robin Segulem - [email protected] Bello Market – My Hood Benjamin Szabo 6 Back image: Tom Gifford Greenwich John Levett - [email protected] 11 Stoke Newington Portraits Emma Marshall 8 London Independent Photography is a community organisation Kingston upon Thames of photographers from different backgrounds and levels of Matthew Green - [email protected] expertise who wish to develop their individual approach to Putney Unfinished Houses Raphael Schutz-Weissmann 10 photography. The group was founded in 1987 as an informal Andrew Wilson - [email protected] gathering of like-minded photographers, and has since grown Queens Park to over 600 members. Not-for-profit and run by member Simon Butcher - [email protected] FEATURES volunteers, LIP comes together to offer a programme of Ruislip Metroland workshops and talks, and to produce an annual group exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • BRUTAL LONDON Robin Hood Gardens CONSTRUCT YOUR OWN CONCRETE CAPITAL Space House ZUPAGRAFIKA, with CONTRIBUTIONS by JOHN GRINDROD and PETER CHADWICK
    Appealing to fans of architecture, this ingeniously designed book lets you build replicas of some of London’s iconic post-war concrete structures while learning about their place in the city’s architectural history. Featured buildings: Alexandra Road Estate Alton Estate Aylesbury Estate Balfron Tower Barbican Estate Ledbury Estate National Theatre BRUTAL LONDON Robin Hood Gardens CONSTRUCT YOUR OWN CONCRETE CAPITAL Space House ZUPAGRAFIKA, WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY JOHN GRINDROD AND PETER CHADWICK In this fun and intellectually stimulating book, readers can recreate a number of London’s most renowned Brutalist buildings. Opening with an informative history of the origins and philosophy of Brutalist architecture, the book then focuses on 9 buildings, including the Barbican Estate, Robin Hood Gardens, Balfron Tower and the National Theatre. The first part of the book looks at the significance of each of these buildings, with a short chapter on each, complete with texts and images. The second part of the book consists of a series of 9 pre-cut and folded buildings, printed on heavy card stock, that readers can detach and construct with easy-to- follow instructions. At once fun and informative, this unique book offers a challenging and entertaining approach to architecture. ZUPAGRAFIKA is a creative design studio based in Poland, founded by David Navarro and Martyna Sobecka. The studio originates, illustrates, designs, and publishes their own award-winning, architecture-related objects. JOHN GRINDROD is an author and journalist. He wrote the book Concretopia: A Journey Around the Rebuilding of Postwar Britain and has contributed to The Guardian, the Financial Times, C20 magazine and The Modernist.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories in the Sky VR: Immersive Storytelling, Heritage-Led Stakeholder Engagement, and Community Fatigue
    Stories in the Sky VR: Immersive storytelling, heritage-led stakeholder engagement, and community fatigue Joseph Thomas Empsall Masters by Research University of York Archaeology September 2020 Abstract Stories in the Sky VR was a prototype immersive storytelling experience focusing on Park Hill, Sheffield. The project explored the way that immersive technologies can be used as part of heritage-led community engagement, as a means to articulate intangible heritage. Park Hill represents one of the most divisive buildings in the country; it was regarded as a success in the 1960s, saw a period of dramatic decline in the 1980s and 1990s, and is currently being regenerated by Urban Splash, following the estate’s Grade II* listing in 1998. Through its redevelopment, Park Hill has not only seen an overhaul in its design, but also in the community that now calls the estate home, having transitioned from council estate to gentrified flats. Park Hill represented an ideal testing ground to investigate the potential of immersive technologies, with storytelling embedded in these “flats of the future” since their inception. While the listing details the estate’s value derives from its innovative design, Park Hill also has strong roots in the intangible, through its sense of enduring community, identities, and experiences. Stories in the Sky VR attempted to implement a “bottom-up” approach, giving the stakeholders more control over the narrative and nature of the immersive experience. Ultimately, this proved difficult to achieve, with the fatigue of interviews and tourism having soured large-scale interest in these types of projects. In place of new interviews, previously recorded oral testimonies were utilised to shape the focus of the immersive experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study 2016
    Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study – Stage B Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study – Stage B Prepared for WCL Quarries Ltd Quarries House 2 Cobbett Road Burntwood Staffordshire WS7 3GL Report reference: 63918R2, July 2016 Report status: Final Confidential Prepared by ESI Ltd New Zealand House,160 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, SY2 6FD, UK Tel +44(0)1743 276100 Fax +44 (0)1743 248600 email [email protected] Registered office: New Zealand House, 160 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, SY2 6FD. Registered in England and Wales, number 3212832 Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study – Stage B This report has been prepared by ESI Ltd. (ESI) in its professional capacity as soil and groundwater specialists, with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the agreed scope and terms of contract and taking account of the manpower and resources devoted to it by agreement with its client, and is provided by ESI solely for the internal use of its client. In respect of this report the financing client is WCL. The client / user group for this report is The Lichfield and Hatherton Canal Restoration Trust (LHCRT). The advice and opinions in this report should be read and relied on only in the context of the report as a whole, taking account of the terms of reference agreed with the client. The findings are based on the information made available to ESI at the date of the report (and will have been assumed to be correct) and on current UK standards, codes, technology and practices as at that time. They do not purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion.
    [Show full text]