DOCSLIB.ORG

Heriniainamariea ANG M1 08.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heriniainamariea ANG M1 08.Pdf UNIVERSITY OF ANTANANARIVO FACULTY OF ARTS AND HUMAN SCIENCES ANGLOPHONE STUDIES DEPARTMENT Presented for getting MASTERS DEGREE DIPLOMA IN SCIENCES OF LANGUAGE OPTION SOCIOLINGUISTICS By HERINIAINA Marie Aimee THE FUNCTIONING OF THE INTERACTION ADMINISTRATOR- CITIZEN IN RURAL AREAS: CASES OF THE RURAL COMMUNES OF BELAZAO AND AMBOHIBARY SAMBAINA The Board of Examiners : Professor Lucien RAZANADRAKOTO Professor Andrea CLEMONS Dissertation advisor : Professor Gil Dany RANDRIAMASITIANA Presentation on 27th of June, 2008 Academic Year 2007- 2008 “…if I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, but have not love, I’m nothing…” I Cor 13, 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express all my gratitude to the Almighty God for His blessing which, during my five years’ study, allows me to come eventually to the achievement of this work. Thank you Lord! I’m also deeply grateful to my dissertation advisor, Professor Gil Dany RANDRIAMASITIANA, for despite his infinite responsibilities and occupations, he has always been generous with time, knowledge and experience. Not only is he a dynamic advisor but he also teaches me to do things properly. My deepest appreciation is similarly addressed to - Professor Lucien RAZANADRAKOTO and Professor Andrea CLEMONS for their good willing to evaluate the present work. Similar thanks are addressed to the following people: - Mr Jean de la Croix MALAZAMANANA for his revision of some phonological hints. - The administrative staff of the rural communes of Belazao and Ambohibary Sambaina for their warm reception. But I would like also to thank my family especially my parents for their financial and moral supports and anyone who has contributed to the achievement of the present work May God’s ampleness reward you all a hundred times over! THANK YOU! INTRODUCTION Rural world has been the focus of many universal studies in recent years. At present, it has become more and more interesting that several researchers or groups of researchers from powerful countries as well as from developing ones do not cease publishing books and journals aimed at rural development. As for the southern countries, “grain de sel” is an inter- network gathering 3000 members spread in about sixty countries all over the world when the two-thirds of which are in the sub-Saharan Africa: it consists of a bank of ideas in which debates, exchanges and training on rural subject are discussed in a joint publication, a journal published every three months. Countless countries all over the world are therefore turning to rural concerns. In Madagascar too, the current government is giving priority to rural development. But why is it so important to develop rural world? It is a fact that rural development contributes largely not only to the economic but also the general development of a country. However, this is not the main reason why we have chosen to conduct a study on rural society. Aware of the fact that it is not only a problem of administrative, financial or economic nature but rather human problems, we have decided to conduct a study that targets peasants or rural people who represent approximately the 85, 5% of the Malagasy population and who are but our compatriots. According to the agricultural campaign 2004-2005, the island has counted 13.950.000 (thirteen million and nine hundred fifty thousand) rural individuals1. This big majority of population deserves an appeal for some betterment within social frameworks. Rural development is already included among the eight commitments intended for the implementation of the so called Bold and Exciting Plan for Rapid Development; the Madagascar Action Plan or MAP. But how can we reach there if we do not consider first rural realities? Or if we are not aware of what really happens there? Rural concern covers a relatively vast field which has already been viewed from various domains: agricultural, economic and social. For the last domain, education improvement and health services were already carried out. Also, in the MAP, the fourth commitment which is “Rural Development and a Green Revolution” is made up of six great 1 Recensement de L’Agriculture - Campagne agricole 2004-2005, p 3 1 challenges namely “(1) secure land tenure, (2) improve access to affordable rural financing, (3) launch a sustainable green revolution, (4) promote market oriented activities, (5) diversify rural activities and (6) increase the agricultural value added and promote agribusiness”2. The matter is that when referring to rural land, communication is the last element to come to our mind. Very little consideration is given to communication and its existence is even almost forgotten. We should have noticed that none of these challenges deals with improving communication. Yet, there is no denying that an effective communication is what rural world lacks more particularly in our country. Bringing about revolution and development would be impossible without the consent and persuasion of rural people. Yet, due to their traditional culture, rural people need a particular logic to accept a change and to be fully integrated in a new culture or civilization. Communication is then fundamental to the development of rural world. The Malagasy government has already taken an initiative to this element; it is noted in the MAP that better roads and communication networks will be established in order to further support rapid rural development. But this would not touch the “rural” himself. Considering the fact that even thinking of entering village hall office makes peasants afraid, we would rather direct the approach of communication to the context of administration and bureaucracy. In L’Administration Publique à Madagascar, MASSIOT, M. postulates that in Madagascar, the participation of rural populations to public life still remains a badly solved problem and that the forms of decentralized administration in the countries of the Third World still need to be further studied. As such, the urgency of the situation compelled us to refer to communication which is the first and foremost best way to get to the reduction of this gap between the government and rural people. To contribute to this issue, we have chosen to focus particularly on administrative communication in rural area. But as WATZLAWICK notes it ”Un phénomène demeure incompréhensible tant que le chant d’observation n’est pas suffisamment large pour qu”y soit inclus le contexte dans lequel le dit phénomène se produit”3 , our focus consists primarily of an authentic observation of the interactions between administrators and citizens in communal offices. By so doing, we have studied in particular the cases of the rural communes of Ambohibary Sambaina and Belazao which are both parts 2 Madagascar Action Plan 2007-2012, p. 064 3 Alex Muchielli, Jean Antoine Corbalan, Valérie Fernandez, Théorie de processus de la communication, Armand Colin (Masson), Paris, 1998, p. 15 2 of the Sous prefecture of Antsirabe II. We have made lots of raids in the two places and recorded some useful pieces of conversation and discourse. But we have also enriched information from an intensive reading about the theoretical and experimental frameworks of the research. We have particularly focused our study on the observation of two particular sections: copy of act of birth and register office practice. As such, we have tried to determine the problems of the interaction, understand peasants’ expectations and aspirations, and suggest some solutions adapted to rural logic. Then, we realize that “communicational problems constitute a determining factor of behaviour change of rural people”. Interacting in an administrative or bureaucratic context is a strange and different phenomenon for peasants that if they have the chance to, they would escape from it in their daily lives. So to begin with, the first part will present with details the settings of the research: description of the two places of investigation, theoretical and experimental frameworks of the research and the methodology used. Then, in the second part, we will concentrate on the culture of the two rural communes as seen through administrative practices: users ‘presentation, social divisions of work, civil marriage practice and language use. At last, we will focus on the correlation between different factors resulting in a failing administration and communication while suggesting at the same time some appropriate remedies to these failures. 3 PART I: PRESENTATION OF THE RESEARCH SETTINGS I.1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PLACES OF INVESTIGATION Our research is conducted in two rural communes in the Vakinankaratra region: Belazao and Ambohibary Sambaina. Both communes are parts of the “sous-prefecture” of Antsirabe II, the Prefecture of Vakinankaratra, and the autonomous province of Antananarivo. Picture n° 1 Location map of the places of investigation FTM-BD 500 4 I.1.1. The rural commune of belazao I.1.1.1. Historical and geographical background I.1.1.1.1. Historical insight The commune of Belazao was in the old time the site of a market of reputation. People do come there to make purchases but mainly to exchange information which never knows an end, hence the name “BELAZAO” (much information). I.1.1.1.2. Geographical location of the commune The rural commune of Belazao is demarcated by the four following communes North: Antanimandry South: Mangarano and Tritriva East: Antsirabe I West: Tritriva Leaving from Antsirabe city and following the national road RN° 34 until reaching the village of Talata Andraikiba, one just turns off to the left and runs 4 kilometres of the RIP to be welcome to Belazao4. I.1.1.1.3. Territorial organization The rural commune of Belazao is made up of 7 Fokontany: Belazao which is the administrative centre, Amboniavaratra, Anjanamiakatra, Miadakofeno, Andranonandriana, Tsarahasina and Ambohinapetraka. It covers an area of 38, 89 km2. It is densely populated with about 243 inhabitants per square kilometre. I.1.1.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distr. GENERAL CRC/C/8/Add.5 13 September 1993 ENGLISH Original
    Distr. GENERAL CRC/C/8/Add.5 13 September 1993 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Initial reports of States parties due in 1993 Addendum MADAGASCAR [20 July 1993] CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction ........................ 1- 4 4 I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES .................. 5-34 4 A. Non-discrimination ................ 7-20 4 B. Best interests of the child............ 21-26 7 C. Right to life, survival and development...... 27-31 8 D. Respect for the views of the child ........ 32-34 9 II. BASIC HEALTH AND WELFARE ............... 35-64 10 A. Survival and development ............. 36-43 10 B. Disabled children................. 44-49 11 C. Health and health services ............ 50-61 12 GE.93-18558 (E) CRC/C/8/Add.5 page 2 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page D. Social security.................. 62- 64 14 E. Standard of living ................ 65- 66 14 III. CIVIL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS............... 67-154 15 A. Right of the child to an identity (art. 7) and preservation of identity (art. 8)......... 70-101 15 B. Freedom of expression (art. 13), freedom of thought, conscience and religion (art. 14) and access to information (art. 17).......... 102-139 21 C. Freedom of association and peaceful assembly (art. 15)..................... 140 28 D. Protection of privacy (art. 16).......... 141 28 E. Right not to be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (art. 37 (a)) ............. 142-154 28 IV. FAMILY ENVIRONMENT AND ALTERNATIVE CARE........ 155-210 31 A. Parental guidance (art. 5) ............ 155-166 31 B.
    [Show full text]
  • RALAMBOZANANY Reine Dokia ECO N°
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO A/U : 2004/05 Faculté de Droit, d’Economie, de Gestion et de Sociologie ---------------------- Département ECONOMIE ---------------------- Deuxième Cycle – Promotion Sortante ---------------------- Mémoire de Maîtrise ès Science Economique : LA FILIERE FRUITS ET LEGUMES DANS LA REGION DU VAKINANKARATRA Directeur de mémoire : RANDRETSA Maminavalona Professeur titulaire à l’Université d’Antananarivo Présenté par : RALAMBOZANANY Reine Dolcia Date de Soutenance 20 Décembre 2005 REMERCIEMENT : Ce travail a été le fruit d’une longue réflexion et d’une rude recherche. Ceci ne peut être accompli sans la grande aide de ceux qui ont contribué de près ou de loin à sa réalisation. Un remerciement à Monsieur RANDRETSA Maminavalona qui a bien voulu m’encadrer dans la réalisation de ce mémoire. Je dédie aussi un vif remerciement à tous nos professeurs pour leurs enseignements et conseils. J’adresse un profond remerciement à tous les organismes qui ont contribué à la conception de ce mémoire : - à Monsieur Rakotoralahy J. Baptiste, Chef de Service du DRDR du Vakinankaratra - à Madame Ratsimbazafy Modestine, Responsable de la promotion de la filière fruits et légumes dans la Région (DRDR) - aux responsables de la documentation du MAEP - à tous les personnels du CTHA - à Monsieur Nary, ingénieur agronome de la CTHA qui m’a beaucoup aidé lors de ma descente dans la commune d’Ambano. Nous espérons que ce modeste travail, contribuera à la prise de décision non seulement sur les politiques de développement local mais aussi celles du développement rural de Madagascar. TABLE DES MATIERES - 2 - REMERCIEMENT INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………….. 05 Partie I : Etat des lieux….…………………………………………………………… 06 Chap I : Contexte socio-économique de la région du Vakinankaratra…………… 06 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensionnement De La Route Antsirabe-Soanindrariny 1
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO ECOLE SUPERIEURE POLYTECHNIQUE D’ANTANANARIVO DEPARTEMENT BATIMENT ET TRAVAUX PUBLICS MEMOIRE DE FIN D’ ETUDES EN VUE DE L’ OBTENTION DU DIPLOME D’ INGENIEUR DDIIMMEENNSSIIOONNNNEEMMEENNTT DDEE LLAA RROOUUTTEE AANNTTSSIIRRAABBEE--SSOOAANNIINNDDRRAARRIINNYY (( DDUU PP..KK 00++000000 AAUU PP..KK 2288++225500 )) Présenté par : ANDRIANANTOANDRO Hajaniaina Herilalaina Encadré par : RALAIARISON Moïse Date de soutenance : 03 Février 2005 REMERCIEMENTS Le présent travail n’a pu être effectué sans la grâce de Dieu Tout Puissant. J’exprime mes vifs et sincères remerciements ainsi que ma profonde reconnaissance à : M. RANDRIANOELINA Benjamin, Directeur de l’Ecole Supérieure Polytechnique d’Antananarivo, qui, par son administration clairvoyante a fait de l’école ce qu’elle est ; M. RABENATOANDRO Martin, Chef de département du Bâtiment et Travaux Publics, grâce à qui, j’ai apprécié ma spécialité ; M. RALAIARISON Moïse, Maître de conférence, mon encadreur pédagogique, qui n’a pas ménagé ses conseils pour me guider tout au long du travail ; Je remercie également : Les Maires de la commune de Soanindrariny et de la commune d’Ambohidranandriana ; Tout le personnel enseignant et administratif de l’ ESPA Je ne saurais oublier de remercier ma famille et mes proches qui m’ont toujours soutenu et encouragé tout au long de mes études. SOMMAIRE INTRODUCTION GENERALE PREMIERE PARTIE : ETUDES SOCIO-ECONOMIQUES Chap. I : DESCRIPTION DU PROJET I- PRESENTATION GLOBALE DU PROJET II- OBJECTIF DU PROJET III- RESULTATS ATTENDUS CONCLUSION PARTIELLE Chap. II : PRESENTATION DE LA ZONE DU PROJET OBJECTIF I- COMMUNE RURALE DE SOANINDRARINY II- COMMUNE URBAINE D’ANTSIRABE III- COMMUNE RURALE D’AMBOHIDRANANDRIANA CONCLUSION PARTIELLE Chap. III : PREVISION SOCIO-ECONOMIQUE I.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium De Vinaninkarena (Antsirabe) : Approche Magnetique Et Spectrometrique
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO ECOLE SUPERIEURE POLYTECHNIQUE D’ANTANANARIVO (E.S.P.A) DEPARTEMENT GEOLOGIE MEMOIRE DE FIN D’ETUDES EN VUE DE L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME D’INGENIEUR GEOLOGUE URANIUM DE VINANINKARENA (ANTSIRABE) : APPROCHE MAGNETIQUE ET SPECTROMETRIQUE Présenté par : RAMAHANDRISOA Andrianambinina Zolalaina Nalahatriniavo Soutenu le 05 février 2015 UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO ECOLE SUPERIEURE POLYTECHNIQUE D’ANTANANARIVO (E.S.P.A) DEPARTEMENT GEOLOGIE MEMOIRE DE FIN D’ETUDES EN VUE DE L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME D’INGENIEUR GEOLOGUE URANIUM DE VINANINKARENA (ANTSIRABE) : APPROCHE MAGNETIQUE ET SPECTROMETRIQUE Présenté par : RAMAHANDRISOA Andrianambinina Zolalaina Nalahatriniavo Président de Jury : Mme RAHANTARISOA Lydia, Maître de Conférences Examinateurs : Mme RAHARIJAONA RAHARISON Léa Jacqueline, Maître de Conférences M. MANDIMBIHARISON Aurélien, Maître de Conférences Directeur de Mémoire : Mme RAZAFIMBELO Rachel, Maître de Conférences REMERCIEMENTS En premier lieu, je tiens à remercier le bon Dieu, sans qui je serais rien et je n‟aurais accompli quoi que ce soit. Mes remerciements s‟adressent aussi principalement à : M. ANDRIANARY Philippe Antoine, directeur de l‟Ecole Supérieure Polytechnique d‟Antananarivo, qui assure le bon fonctionnement de l‟école et qui a autorisé cette soutenance M. MANDIMBIHARISON Aurélien Jacques, Maitre de conférences à l‟Ecole Supérieure Polytechnique d‟Antananarivo et Chef de département de la filière géologie ; Mme RAZAFIMBELO Rachel, Maitre de conférences à l‟ESPA, Directeur de ce mémoire ; Mme RAHANTARISOA Lydia, Maitre de conférences à l‟ESPA, qui me fait l‟honneur de présider ce mémoire. J'adresse tout naturellement mes remerciements aux autres membres du jury qui ont accepté d‟examiner ce mémoire malgré leurs innombrables occupations : Mme RAHARIJAONA RAHARISON Léa Jacqueline, Maître de Conférences à l‟ESPA M.
    [Show full text]
  • Banque Mondiale Evaluation Du Programme Transfert
    BANQUE MONDIALE EVALUATION DU PROGRAMME TRANSFERT MONETAIRE CONDITIONNEL DE BETAFO RAPPORT DEFINITIF Paul RANDRIANIRINA Consultant Décembre 2018 TABLE DES MATIERES LISTE DES TABLEAUX ................................................................................................................................ v LISTE DES GRAPHIQUES ........................................................................................................................... vi SIGLES ET ACRONYMES ......................................................................................................................... viii RESUME EXECUTIF ................................................................................................................................... ix 1. PRESENTATION GENERALE DE L'ETUDE .......................................................................................... 2 1.1. ZONE D’ETUDE ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2. PROGRAMME TMC .................................................................................................................. 3 1.3. OBJECTIFS DE L’ETUDE ............................................................................................................ 5 1.4. METHODOLOGIE ...................................................................................................................... 5 2. PROFIL DES MENAGES ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution De La Couverture De Forets Naturelles a Madagascar
    EVOLUTION DE LA COUVERTURE DE FORETS NATURELLES A MADAGASCAR 1990-2000-2005 mars 2009 La publication de ce document a été rendue possible grâce à un support financier du Peuple Americain à travers l’USAID (United States Agency for International Development). L’analyse de la déforestation pour les années 1990 et 2000 a été fournie par Conservation International. MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DES FORETS ET DU TOURISME Le présent document est un rapport du Ministère de l’Environnement, des Forêts et du Tourisme (MEFT) sur l’état de de l’évolution de la couverture forestière naturelle à Madagascar entre 1990, 2000, et 2005. Ce rapport a été préparé par Conservation International. Par ailleurs, les personnes suivantes (par ordre alphabétique) ont apporté leur aimable contribution pour sa rédaction: Andrew Keck, James MacKinnon, Norotiana Mananjean, Sahondra Rajoelina, Pierrot Rakotoniaina, Solofo Ralaimihoatra, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Balisama Ramaroson, Andoniaina Rambeloson, Rija Ranaivosoa, Pierre Randriamantsoa, Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga et Marc Steininger. Le traitement des imageries satellitaires a été réalisé par Balisama Ramaroson, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga, Pierre Randriamantsoa et Rija Ranaivosoa et les cartes ont été réalisées par Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery. La réalisation de ce travail a été rendu possible grâce a une aide financière de l’United States Agency for International Development (USAID) et mobilisé à travers le projet JariAla. En effet, ce projet géré par International Resources Group (IRG) fournit des appuis stratégiques et techniques au MEFT dans la gestion du secteur forestier. Ce rapport devra être cité comme : MEFT, USAID et CI, 2009. Evolution de la couverture de forêts naturelles à Madagascar, 1990- 2000-2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Résultats Détaillés Antananarivo
    RESULTATS SENATORIALES DU 29/12/2015 FARITANY: 1 ANTANANARIVO BV reçus: 313 sur 313 GASIKA MARINA HVM MAPAR MMM NY AREMA ASSOCI TIM RA MANGA ATION MAINTS RANO MALAG N°BV Emplacement AP AT Inscrits Votants B N S E O MALAZA ASY SAMBA REGION 11 ANALAMANGA BV reçus 140 sur 140 DISTRICT: 1101 AMBOHIDRATRIMO BV reçus24 sur 24 01 AMBATO 0 0 8 7 0 7 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 AMBATOLAMPY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 2 03 AMBOHIDRATRIMO 0 0 10 10 0 10 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 04 AMBOHIMANJAKA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 AMBOHIMPIHAONANA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 06 AMBOHITRIMANJAKA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 07 AMPANGABE 0 0 8 7 0 7 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 AMPANOTOKANA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 09 ANJANADORIA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 ANOSIALA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 11 ANTANETIBE MAHAZA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 ANTEHIROKA 0 0 8 6 0 6 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 ANTSAHAFILO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 AVARATSENA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 FIADANANA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 16 IARINARIVO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 IVATO 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 18 MAHABO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 MAHEREZA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 MAHITSY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 MANANJARA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 MANJAKAVARADRAN 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 23 MERIMANDROSO 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 24 TALATAMATY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL DISTRICT 0 0 172 165 0 165 0 28 98 7 2 0 0 2 28 DISTRICT: 1102 ANDRAMASINA BV reçus14 sur 14 01 ALAROBIA VATOSOLA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 ALATSINAINY
    [Show full text]
  • Low Cost, Low Tech SNP Genotyping Tools for Resource-Limited Areas: Plague in Madagascar As a Model
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Low cost, low tech SNP genotyping tools for resource-limited areas: Plague in Madagascar as a model Cedar L. Mitchell1¤a, Voahangy Andrianaivoarimanana2, Rebecca E. Colman1¤b, Joseph Busch1, Heidie Hornstra-O'Neill1, Paul S. Keim1,3, David M. Wagner1, Minoarisoa Rajerison2*, Dawn N. Birdsell1* 1 The Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America, 2 Plague Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar, 3 Translational a1111111111 Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America a1111111111 a1111111111 ¤a Current address: Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North a1111111111 Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America a1111111111 ¤b Current address: Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America * [email protected] (MR); [email protected] (DNB) OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: Mitchell CL, Andrianaivoarimanana V, Colman RE, Busch J, Hornstra-O'Neill H, Keim PS, Background et al. (2017) Low cost, low tech SNP genotyping Genetic analysis of pathogenic organisms is a useful tool for linking human cases together tools for resource-limited areas: Plague in Madagascar as a model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11 and/or to potential environmental sources. The resulting data can also provide information (12): e0006077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. on evolutionary patterns within a targeted species and phenotypic traits. However, the pntd.0006077 instruments often used to generate genotyping data, such as single nucleotide polymor- Editor: Cheryl Andam, University of New phisms (SNPs), can be expensive and sometimes require advanced technologies to imple- Hampshire, UNITED STATES ment.
    [Show full text]
  • REPOBLIKAN'i MADAGASIKARA Tanindrazana – Fahafahana
    REPOBLIKAN’I MADAGASIKARA Tanindrazana – Fahafahana – Fandrosoana MINISTERE DES TRAVAUX PUBLICS Décret n° 99-777 portant classement des Routes Provinciales ------------------- LE PREMIER MINISTRE, CHEF DU GOUVERNEMENT, - Vu la constitution - Vu la loi n° 98- 026 du 20 Janvier 1999 portant refonte de la Charte routière - Vu le décret n° 98-522 du 23 Juillet 1998, portant nomination du Premier Ministre Chef du Gouvernement - Vu le décret n° 98-530 du 31 Juillet 1998, portant nomination des membres du Gouvernement Sur proposition du Ministère des Travaux Publics, En Conseil du Gouvernement, DECRETE : ARTICLE PREMIER : sont classées, dans la voirie provinciale, suivant l’article 6 de la loi n° 98-026 du 20 janvier 1999, les sections de routes ci-dessous : Routes Provinciales( Km) REGIONS N° Bitumée En Totale LIAISONS terre ANALAMANGA 1.T 7 9 16 - ANOSIZATO-AMBOHIJOKY 3.T 2 10 12 - RN2- ANJEVA-AMBATOMANGA 4.T - 10 10 - ANJEVA –ANTELOMITA 5.T - 34 34 - RN2 PK11 –FIHASINA 6.T 2 10 12 - AMBOHIMANGA vers MAHITSY 7.T 1 13 14 - RN1-FENOARIVO-AMPANGABE 8.T 5 22 27 - RN7/PK22- RN1/PK8 9.T - 7 7 - FENOARIVO RP8.T 10.T - 30 30 - RN7/PK19 – ZAFIMBAZAHA 11.T 4 11 15 - RN7/PK16+300-ANKADITDRATOMBO 12.T - 5 5 - ALASORA AMBOHIMARINA 13.T 8 - 8 - ANDOHATAPENAKA AMBOHIMANDROSO 14.T 3 - 3 - RN1/PK6+700-RP13T 15.T - 29 29 - RN2-FIEFERANA TALATA VOLONONDRY 16.T - 19 19 - RR3/PK8-VOLIHAZO 17.T - 12 12 - RN7- TSIAFAHY –vers MANDROSOA 18.T - 11 11 - IVATO-RN3-LAZAINA-RP33T 20.T - 8 8 - RN7 PK 22- vers ANDRAMASINA 21.T - 20 20 - ANKADINANDRIANA –TSIAFAHY 22.T - 6
    [Show full text]
  • Toerana Azo Antonina Amin'izany
    FAMPAHAFANTARANA Vaccinodrome manerana ny Nosy Ho antsika mpiara-miasa rehetra eto amin’ny Minisiteran’ny Toekarena sy ny Fitantanam-bola, izay maniry ny hanao na eto amin’ny faritra Analamanga na any amin’ny Faritra, dia omena antsika eto ireo toerana azo antonina amin’izany. Faritra Analamanga ATSINANANA TOAMASINA I CHUM TOAMASINA CSB Urbain AMBOHIDRATRIMO TOAMASINA II BSD TOAMASINA II CSB 2 Ivato Aeroport, CSB 2 Mahitsy, CSB 2 Antehiroka, CSB 2 CSB FANANDRANA Soavinimerina, CSB 2 Talatamaty, CSB 2 Ambohitrimanjaka, CSB FOULPOINTE CSB 2 Ambodirano, CSB 2 Ampangabe, CSB 2 Ambatolampy BRICKAVILLE CSB URBAIN BRICKAVILLE tsimahafotsy, CSB 2 Antanetibe Mahazaza, CSB 2 Anosiala. CHRD2 BRICKAVILLE MAHANORO CHRD MAHANORO ANTANANARIVO ATSIMONDRANO CSB U MAHANORO Hopitaly Itaosy, CSB 2 Andoharanofotsy, CSB 2 Ankadivoribe, CSB1 AMPITAKIHOSY CSB 2 Faliarivo, CSB 2 Itaosy Bemasoandro, CSB 2 Anosizato, VATOMANDRY BSD VATOMANDRY CSB 2 Itaosy Cité, CSB 2 Anjomakely, CSB 2 Tanjombato, CSB URBAIN VATOMANDRY CSB 2 Fenoarivo, CSB 2 Tsararivotra, CSB 2 Soavina, CSB 2 MAROLAMBO CHRD MAROLAMBO Ambohijafy, CSB 2 Ankaraobato, CSB 2 Ambohijanaka, CSB 2 CSB2 MAROLAMBO Ambaniala Itaosy. ANTANAMBAO MANAMPONTSY CHRD ANTANAMBAO MANAMPOTSY ANTANANARIVO AVARADRANO CSB 2 Anosiavaratra, CSB 2 Ankadikely, CSB 2 Ampahimanga, DIANA CSB 2 Masindray, CSB 2 Ambohimangakely, CSB 2 Alasora, ANTSIRANANA 1 CSBU TANAMBAO CSB 2 Sabotsy Namehana, CSB 2 Talata Volonondry, CSB 2 AMBILOBE CSB2 AMBILOBE Anjeva, CSB 2 Ankadinandrina, CSB 2 Ambohimanga Rova, CSB2 AMPONDRALAVA CSB 2 Ambohimalaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Reseaux De Distribution Dir Antsirabe Rapport Final
    / REPOBLIKAN’I MADAGASIKARA Fitiavana - Tanindrazana - Fandrosoana -------------- MINISTERE DE L’EAU, DE L’ENERGIE ET DES HYDROCARBURES MEEH Public Disclosure Authorized -------------- JIRO SY RANO MALAGASY JIRAMA -------------- PROJET D’AMELIORATION DE LA P.A.G.O.S.E. GOUVERNANCE ET DES OPERATIONS DANS LE SECTEUR DE L’ELECTRICITE Public Disclosure Authorized PLAN DE GESTION ENVIRONNEMENTAL ET SOCIAL (PGES) RESEAUX DE DISTRIBUTION Public Disclosure Authorized DIR ANTSIRABE RAPPORT FINAL Public Disclosure Authorized Avril 2018 PROJET D’AMELIORATION DE LA GOUVERNANCE ET DES OPERATIONS DANS LE SECTEUR DE L’ELECTRICITE Plan de Gestion Environnementale et Sociale – Distribution Antsirabe SOMMAIRE SIGLES ET ABREVIATIONS ________________________________________________________ V RESUME NON TECHNIQUE_________________________________________________________ 1 NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY _______________________________________________________ 1 FAMINTINANA TSOTRA ____________________________________________________________ I I. INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________________________ 6 I.1 CONTEXTE GENERAL ___________________________________________________________ 6 I.2 OBJECTIFS __________________________________________________________________ 7 I.3 DEMARCHE METHODOLOGIQUE ____________________________________________________ 8 Etudes bibliographiques _______________________________________________ 8 Investigations sur terrain et consultation publique _________________________ 8 Rédaction du rapport __________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • [ Manuel De Verification'i
    ~POBLIKAN'I MADAGASIKARA Tanindrazana - Fahafahanâ - Fahamarinana YIN1ST~RB DE L' ECONOMIE, DU PLAN ET DU REDRBSSBMENT SOCIAL DIRBCTION' GBNERALE DE LA BANQUE DES DON NEES DE L'BTAT COMMISSION N'ATIONALE DIRECTION DV RECENSEMBNT GENERAL- DU iECBNSENENT ~ENERAL DE LA POPULATION ET DE L'HABITAT DB LA 1'OPULATION ST J)E L'HABITAT ,. DEUXIEME RECENSEMENT GENERAL DE LA POPULATION ET DE L'HABITAT 1993 --- 1 / [ MANUEL DE VERIFICATION ' I Version 2.s . fO\<l.ocrsph\lIIanveT2.8 Janvier 94 REPOBLlKAN'I MADAGASlKARA 'farundrazalla - Fahafahana - Fahamarinana UINISTERE DE L'ECONOMIE, DU PLAN ET DU REDRESSEMENT SOCIAL DIRECTIO:-: GENERALE DE LA BANQUE DES DONNEES DE L'ETAT COMMISSION NATIONALE DIREC1ION Dl! RECENSEMENT GENERAL DU RECENSEMENT GENERAL DE LA POP U LATIO:i ET DE l' HABITAT DE LA POPULATION ET DE L'HABITAT DEUXIEME RECENSEMEl\rrr GEN]~RAL DE LA POPULATION Err DE L ~HA,BI'TAT 1993 MANUEL DE VERIFICATION 1 Il Version 2.s fb\docrBPh\manver2.s Janvier 94 SOI\.iMA1RE INTRODUCTIO~~ . 2 l - GENERALITES SUR LA VERIFICATION 1.1 - LA SECTION V"ERIFICATION ..•.........' , . ,........... 2 1.2 - LE TR~ VAIL DU \lt:RlFICATEUR ..................... 2 1.3 - L'IDEN1IFICATION DES QUESTIONNAIRES .. ,.... ~, ...... 3 1.4- LES QUESTIOl'.~.AIRES-SUITE ...................... 5 ,2 '- METIIODE DE'VERIFICATION o - MILIEU ..............................••........ 5 l - 'FARITA.N1" 2 - F IVONDRONA1\fPOK0l'41 Al"\""l , 3 - FIRAISM1POKONTMry· ..............•...•..........• 5 4 -. N°DE LA ZONE 5 - N e DU S EGME?\l . ~ . .. .... 6 6 "- FOKONTAl~l'· 7 - LOCALITE .... ' .....•..............•..... la ••' • • • • • • 8 8 - N ~ 'DU B.ATIMEr1T .•..-. _ .....•.. ~ ..••.•' .•••.•..•• · • 8 . 9 - TI'1>E' D'UTILISATION . '........................ · . 8 , <> DU ,..,.-c.... TAGE .. 9 ,~ 10. ~ _N Ir}...!::..l'" .• • .
    [Show full text]