DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Road Projects in England

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Road Projects in England The Impact of Road Projects in England Lynn Sloman, Lisa Hopkinson and Ian Taylor Transport for Quality of Life March 2017 Commissioned by: Project name: The Impact of Road Projects in England Client: CPRE Date: March 2017 The preferred citation of this report is: Sloman L, Hopkinson L and Taylor I (2017) The Impact of Road Projects in England Report for CPRE Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence Acknowledgments The following people provided information and help during the course of this project, which we gratefully acknowledge: James Abbott, Michele Allen, Sarah Arnold, Andy Bennett, Kerris Casey-St Pierre, Jackie Copley, Amy Cowburn, Steve Donagain, Tony Duckworth, Robin Field, Peter Foreman, Alan Gray, Chantelle Grundy, David Harby, Tony Forward, Jeffery Kenyon, Bettina Lange, Ian Lings, No M65 Link Road Protest Group, David Penney, Martin Porter, Oliver Scott, Stuart Scott, Ralph Smyth, Jack Taylor, James Syson, Trinley Walker, Petra Ward, Paula Whitney, Louise Wootton, Hadyn Yeo. It would not have been possible to make this assessment of the impact of roads projects without the POPE evaluation process that was put in place by the Highways Agency twenty years ago. Although our assessment of the evidence has drawn some markedly different conclusions from those reached in the POPE meta-analyses, we acknowledge the value and importance of the POPE process itself. We also acknowledge and are grateful for the willingness of Highways England to assist with this research, by supplying data and information from their archives. We also thank Tony Forward for access to his archive of planning documents. Cover image: Excavation of cutting for the Newbury Bypass; Chris Gomersall rspb- images.com All other images: Transport for Quality of Life, unless otherwise stated TfQL Community Interest Company Telephone: 01654 781358 Email: [email protected] Contact: Lynn Sloman, [email protected] 2 | Page Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 9 PART I: Evidence from POPEs and Meta-analyses ............................................................ 11 2. Effects of Road Schemes on Traffic Volume .................................................................... 11 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Our methodology to assess existence of induced traffic ........................................ 12 2.3 Evidence of induced traffic ...................................................................................... 14 2.4 Variance of conclusions to those in the POPE meta-analysis .................................. 21 3. Effects of Road Schemes on Landscape, Biodiversity and Heritage ................................ 22 3.1 Landscape impact: evidence from POPE ................................................................. 22 3.2 Biodiversity impacts: evidence from POPE.............................................................. 25 3.3 Heritage impacts: evidence from POPE ................................................................... 27 3.4 Highways England’s responsibility for landscape and biodiversity ......................... 28 3.5 POPE approach to assessment of environmental impact ....................................... 28 4. Effects of Road Schemes on the Local Economy ............................................................. 30 4.1 Economic development impact: evidence from POPE ............................................ 30 4.2 Our assessment of economic evidence in the POPEs .............................................. 43 4.3 Other evidence on the economic impact of road schemes .................................... 45 4.4 Comments on the POPE approach to the assessment of economic impact ........... 46 5. Other Effects of Road Schemes ....................................................................................... 48 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 48 5.2 Congestion and reliability ........................................................................................ 48 5.3 Journey time savings in cost-benefit analysis of road schemes .............................. 50 5.4 Road safety .............................................................................................................. 53 5.5 Greenhouse gas emissions ...................................................................................... 54 PART II: Case Study Evidence .......................................................................................... 56 6. Overview of the Case Studies .......................................................................................... 56 7. A34 Newbury Bypass Case Study .................................................................................... 59 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 59 7.2 Traffic impact ........................................................................................................... 60 7.3 Landscape and other environmental impacts ......................................................... 62 7.4 Economic impact ..................................................................................................... 66 3 | Page 7.5 Land development impact ....................................................................................... 67 7.6 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 74 8. M65 Blackburn Southern Bypass Case Study .................................................................. 75 8.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 75 8.2 Traffic impact ........................................................................................................... 76 8.3 Landscape and other environmental impacts ......................................................... 80 8.4 Economic impact ..................................................................................................... 83 8.5 Land development impact ....................................................................................... 86 8.6 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 88 9. A46 Newark – Lincoln Case Study ................................................................................... 90 9.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 90 9.2 Traffic impact ........................................................................................................... 91 9.3 Landscape and other environmental impacts ......................................................... 94 9.4 Economic impact ..................................................................................................... 98 9.5 Land development impact ..................................................................................... 101 9.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 103 10. A120 Stansted to Braintree Case Study ..................................................................... 105 10.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 105 10.2 Traffic impact ......................................................................................................... 107 10.3 Landscape and other environmental impacts ....................................................... 110 10.4 Economic impact ................................................................................................... 113 10.5 Land development impact ..................................................................................... 116 10.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 118 PART III: Evidence Synthesis and Recommendations ..................................................... 119 11. Overview of the effects of the roads programme ..................................................... 119 11.1 Roads and generated traffic .................................................................................. 119 11.2 Roads and environmental impacts ........................................................................ 121 11.3 Roads and economic impacts ................................................................................ 122 11.4 Roads and land use change ................................................................................... 126 11.5 Roads, safety and physical activity ........................................................................ 126 11.6 Was road building the solution?............................................................................ 127 11.7 Recommendations and conclusions ...................................................................... 129 4 | Page 5 | Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study examines the impacts of road
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A46 Coventry Junctions Upgrade (Binley Junction) Highways England Statement of Case
    A46 Coventry Junctions Upgrade (Binley junction) Highways England Statement of Case In respect of the Highways and Compulsory Purchase Orders under Provisions of the Highways Act 1980 January 2020 Page 1 of 72 A46 Coventry Junctions Upgrade (Binley junction) Highways England Statement of Case This page is left intentionally blank Page 2 of 72 A46 Coventry Junctions Upgrade (Binley junction) Highways England Statement of Case STATEMENT OF CASE for THE A46 TRUNK ROAD (COVENTRY JUNCTIONS UPGRADE (BINLEY)) (TRUNKING) ORDER 201[ ] and THE A46 TRUNK ROAD (COVENTRY JUNCTIONS UPGRADE (BINLEY)) (DETRUNKING) ORDER 201[ ] and THE A46 TRUNK ROAD (COVENTRY JUNCTIONS UPGRADE (BINLEY)) (SIDE ROADS) ORDER 2019 and THE A46 TRUNK ROAD (COVENTRY JUNCTIONS UPGRADE (BINLEY)) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2019 Page 3 of 72 A46 Coventry Junctions Upgrade (Binley junction) Highways England Statement of Case Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................... 10 Background ....................................................................................................... 14 Environmental Assessment of the Project ...................................................... 18 Traffic and Economic Assessment of the Scheme ......................................... 24 The Orders ......................................................................................................... 37 Page 4 of 72 A46 Coventry Junctions Upgrade (Binley junction) Highways England Statement of Case Conformity
    [Show full text]
  • Item C1 SW/09/894 – Installation of a Small Scale Biomass Power Plant
    SECTION C MINERALS AND WASTE DISPOSAL Background Documents - the deposited documents, views and representations received as referred to in the reports and included in the development proposals dossier for each case and also as might be additionally indicated. Item C1 SW/09/894 – Installation of a small scale biomass power plant within an existing and extended building for the generation of renewable energy from low grade waste wood at Ridham Dock Road, Iwade, Sittingbourne, Kent A report by Head of Planning Applications Group to Planning Applications Committee on 11 May 2010. SW/09/894 – Installation of a small scale biomass power plant within an existing and extended building for the generation of renewable energy from low grade waste wood at Ridham Dock Road, Iwade, Sittingbourne, Kent ME9 8SR (MR. 921 674) Recommendation: Permission BE GRANTED subject to conditions. Local Member: Mr A Willicombe Classification: Unrestricted Background 1. Planning permission was granted in 2006, for a material recovery facility (MRF), in-vessel composting facility and the continuation of secondary aggregate recycling operations at the Countrystyle Recycling site, Ridham Dock, under planning consent reference SW/05/1392. Under its current consent the site is permitted to handle some 31,000 tonnes of compostable waste and 35,000 tonnes per year of recyclable waste through the MRF. Whilst the permission also allows for the continuation of 10,000 tonnes per annum of secondary aggregate recycling, this activity appears to have all but ceased and replaced with shredding of low grade wood waste. Site Description and Proposal 2. The site itself lies some 2km north of Kemsley, 2.1 km to the east of Iwade and 1.2km to the east of the A249.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable & Low Carbon Energy Study
    Renewable and Low Carbon Energy Study Maslen Environmental Addendum Pendle Borough Council: January 2011 Following Pendle Council’s six-week public consultation1 on the findings of the Renewable and Low Carbon Energy Study (Maslen, 2010) the following comments should be noted when reading the study: Section 2.1.1 National Policy and European Context (Page 3) The planning Inspectorate will assume the role of the Infrastructure Planning Commission, following changes introduced in the Decentralisation and Localism Bill, 2010. Section 2.1.3 Local Policy Context (Page 10) In addition to Policy 19, the emerging Rossendale Core Strategy also includes Policy 20: Wind Energy, which sets out the criteria against which wind energy proposals will be assessed. Section 4.1.2 General Constraints (Page 21) The list under ‘Cultural Sensitivies’ should include a reference to ‘Historic Parks and Gardens’. Section 4.1.3 Considering Suitable Locations (Page 22) It should be noted that national policy on heritage assets is set out in Planning Policy Statement 5: Planning for the Historic Environment (PPS5) (Communities & Local Government, March 2010). Section 4.1.3 Considering Suitable Locations – Local Designations (Page 23) Consideration should also be given to ‘non designated heritage assets’ i.e. locally important, but not nationally designated, heritage resources. In some instances satisfactory mitigation of the impact of a proposal, on an environmental or cultural designation, may not be possible. In such cases an application may be refused. Section 4.2.3 Landscape – Wind Energy (Page 31) The Lancashire County Council Landscape Character Assessment has been informed by the historic landscape assessment of Lancashire carried out by the County Archaeology Service, which commenced in January 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Pendle Park E-Brochure V2
    FORWARD THINKING BUSINESS WWW.PENDLEPARK.COM Pendle Park is a new commercial business park located of junction 13 (M65) Planning permission granted* for a major new logistics/manufacturing estate of 600,000 sq ft covering 55 acres. Phase 1 - 250,000 sq ft (units from 1,500 - 195,000 sq ft) Phase 2 - Up to 350,000 sq ft (approx.) FORWARD THINKING BUSINESS *Outline Planning Secured (B1,B2,B8). Alternative Uses (Subject to Planning). COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK PENDLE JCT 13 PARK Pendle Park is a major, new, M65 employment site ofering industrial, manufacturing and logistics opportunities. The site can accommodate a single unit of upto 400,000 sq ft on a design and build basis. Phase I ofers a range of smaller units from 1,500-22,500 sq ft as well as 195,000 sq ft which will be ready for occupation in Q2 2022. PHASE 1 Phase 2 will ofer a range of build to suit opportunities up to 350,000 sq ft. A full design team is in place and ready to provide PHASE 2 schemes based on the specific requirements of occupiers. Pendle Park will benefit from a dedicated access of the A665 with new junction. WWW.PENDLEPARK.COM FORWARD THINKING BUSINESS PENDLE PARK © 2021 WWW.PENDLEPARK.COM COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK M65 Jct 13 A6068 LOMESHAYE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE M65 Jct 12 PENDLE PARK © 2021 WWW.PENDLEPARK.COM COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK J 13 B6249 A6068 A56 LOCATION M65 B6249 The site is situated immediately adjacent to Lomeshaye Industrial Estate which is a well established M65 industrial / logistics location.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Selection Appendix C.28
    Waste Core Strategy Site Options Consultation Waste Site Assessment Appendix C.28: Site 252 - Business/Industrial Park, Tewkesbury/Aschurch October 2009 Appendix C.28: Site 252 - Business/Industrial Park, Tewkesbury/Aschurch Site Maps and Images Site Map © Crown copyright. All rights reserved. Gloucestershire County Council 100019134 2008. Aerial Photo Imagery copyright Getmapping PLC. www.getmapping.com Appendix C.28: Site 252 - Business/Industrial Park, Tewkesbury/Aschurch Site Images Locational Information Site Details District Tewkesbury Parish Northway Tewkesbury Easting 391577 Northing 233604 Approximate Site Area 119 (hectares) Reasons for inclusion NB: Slight anomalies in site boundaries may have arisen The site was identified in the Tewkesbury Local Plan; was listed in from ‘clustering’ of sites from Tewkesbury Borough Council's Employment Land Review and contains more than one source and/or existing waste management facilities. the absence of detailed site plans in source documents. Date of WPA officer 5th December 2008 visit Appendix C.28: Site 252 - Business/Industrial Park, Tewkesbury/Aschurch Broad Description of This is a very large site which consists of three areas. Areas 1 and 2 are to Site (including current the west of the M5 and Area 3 is to the east. The site is based around activities on site, Junction 9 of the M5. location and neighbouring uses) AREA 1 - Is in between the A438 (Ashchurch Road) and Northway Lane. It consists of a large number of older units. Businesses in this area include: Jewsons, Tewkesbury Car Auctions, Cotteswold Dairy, Peugeot garage, Travelodge, Brewers Fayre. AREA 2 – This is a relatively new section of the business Park and is located to the north of Northway Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Gi200900.Pdf
    Gloucestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 2009 Contents Editorial......................................................................................................................................2 From Willow to Wicket: A Lost Cricket Bat Willow Plantation in Leonard Stanley. By Stephen Mills ......................................................................... 3-8 Matthews & Company – Gloucester’s Premier Furniture Manufacturers By Hugh Conway-Jones ......................................................................................... 9-13 Two Recently Discovered Field Books from Sopwith’s Mineral Survey of the Forest of Dean. By Ian Standing ......................................................................... 14-22 The Canal Round House at Inglesham Lock By John Copping (Adapted for the GSIA Journal by Alan Strickland) ..................................................................... 23-35 Upper Redbrook Iron Works 1798-9: David Tanner's Bankruptcy By Pat Morris ...... 36-40 The Malthouse, Tanhouse Farm, Church End, Frampton on Severn, Gloucestershire By Amber Patrick ................................................................................................. 41-46 The Restoration of the Cotswold Canals, July 2010 Update. By Theo Stening .............. 47-50 GSIA Visit Reports for 2009 ............................................................................................. 51-57 Book Reviews ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Road Investment Strategy: Overview
    Road Investment Strategy: Overview December 2014 Road Investment Strategy: Overview December 2014 The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.gov.uk/dft General enquiries https://forms.dft.gov.uk ISBN: 978-1-84864-148-8 © Crown copyright 2014 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Photographic acknowledgements Alamy: Cover Contents 3 Contents Foreword 5 The Strategic Road Network 8 The challenges 9 The vision 10 The Investment Plan 13 The Performance Specification 22 Transforming our roads 26 Appendices: regional profiles 27 The Road Investment Strategy suite of documents (Strategic Vision, Investment Plan, Performance Specification, and this Overview) are intended to fulfil the requirements of Clause 3 of the Infrastructure Bill 2015 for the 2015/16 – 2019/20 Road Period.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Chadwick Hunter Page Planning 18 High Street Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL50 1DZ Our Ref: APP/G1630/V/14/2229497 31 March
    Mark Chadwick Our Ref: APP/G1630/V/14/2229497 Hunter Page Planning 18 High Street Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL50 1DZ 31 March 2016 Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 77 APPLICATION BY ERLP AND THE MERCHANT VENTURERS LAND AT ‘PERRYBROOK’ TO THE NORTH OF BROCKWORTH AND SOUTH OF THE A417, BROCKWORTH, GLOUCESTERSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/01256/OUT 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Mrs KA Ellison BA, MPhil, MRTPI, who held a inquiry from 28-30 July 2015 into your client’s application to Tewkesbury Borough Council (‘the Council’) for outline planning permission for the mixed use development of up to 1,500 dwellings including extra care housing, community facilities including Al, A2, A3, A4 and A5 local retail shops, B1 /B8 employment uses, D1 health facilities and formal/informal public open space, in accordance with application ref 12/01256/OUT, dated 5 December 2012. 2. On 24 November 2014, the Secretary of State directed, in pursuance of Section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, that your client’s application be referred to him instead of being dealt with by the local planning authority, Tewkesbury Borough Council, after consideration of policy on calling-in applications. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the application be approved and planning permission granted. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • HICL Infrastructure PLC Annual Report 2020 Delivering Real Value
    HICL Infrastructure PLC Annual Report 2020 Delivering Real Value. Bangor and Nendrum Schools, UK Contents 2020 Highlights 2 Overview 01 1.1 Chairman’s Statement 6 Strategic Report 02 2.1 The Infrastructure Market 12 2.2 Investment Proposition 17 2.3 HICL’s Business Model & Strategy 18 2.4 Key Performance & Quality Indicators 20 2.5 Investment Manager’s Report 22 Strategic Report: Performance & Risk 03 3.1 Operating Review 30 3.2 Sustainability Report 34 3.3 Financial Review 50 3.4 Valuation of the Portfolio 55 3.5 The Investment Portfolio 68 3.6 Portfolio Analysis 70 3.7 Risk & Risk Management 72 3.8 Viability Statement 84 3.9 Risk Committee Report 85 3.10 Strategic Report Disclosures 89 Directors’ Report 04 4.1 Board and Governance 94 4.2 Board of Directors 96 4.3 The Investment Manager 98 4.4 Corporate Governance Statement 99 4.5 Audit Committee Report 113 4.6 Directors’ Remuneration Report 118 4.7 Report of the Directors 122 4.8 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 126 Financial Statements 05 5.1 Independent Auditor’s Report 130 5.2 Financial Statements 136 5.3 Notes to the Financial Statements 140 Glossary 180 Directors & Advisers 182 Front cover image: Salford Hospital, UK HICL Infrastructure Company Limited (or “HICL Guernsey”) announced on 21 November 2018 that, following consultation with investors, the Board was of the view that it would be in the best interests of shareholders as a whole to move the domicile of the investment business from Guernsey to the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Lune Street, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, Bb12
    On behalf of N J Pask and R J Goode, Joint Fixed Charge Receivers FORMER SUPERMARKET LUNE STREET, PADIHAM, BURNLEY, LANCASHIRE, BB12 8DG SECURE INCOME INVESTMENT GUARANTEED BY CO-OP (12 YEARS UNEXPIRED) FORMER SUPERMARKET LUNE STREET, PADIHAM, BURNLEY, SECURE INCOME INVESTMENT LANCASHIRE, BB12 8DG GUARANTEED BY CO-OP INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS ■ Current rent of £179,885 per annum ■ We are instructed to seek offers in excess of £2,250,000 ■ Prominent town centre former supermarket investment (Two Million, Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Pounds) subject ■ Fixed rental uplifts in June 2021 and ■ Situated in the attractive town of Padiham to contract and exclusive of VAT. This equates to an attractive June 2026, based on 2.25% per annum net initial yield of 7.52% after allowing for purchaser’s costs of ■ The unit comprises a total of 1,023.5 sq m (11,017 sq ft) compounded 5 yearly 6.33%. With the following guaranteed reversions: - of well configured floor space ■ Car parking for 80 cars Date Running Yield ■ Let for a further 12 years (no breaks) to the excellent ■ Freehold June 2021 8.40% covenant of Rochpion Properties (4) LLP, with Co-operative Group Limited as guarantor ■ Site area of 1.18 acres (0.48 hectares) June 2026 9.39% FORMER SUPERMARKET LUNE STREET, PADIHAM, BURNLEY, SECURE INCOME INVESTMENT LANCASHIRE, BB12 8DG GUARANTEED BY CO-OP A687 A65 A61 A19 LANCASTER A59 YORK LOCATION A658 M A65 O M6 A61 O ST Burnley is located in the county of Lancashire, 44 km (27 miles) to the Leeds A64 RRY R UA Bradford E A629 Q A6068 8 A1(M) LA 6 A19 north of Manchester, 17 km (11 miles) to the east of Blackburn and A585 60 E A N N LA E E V BLACKPOOL A59 PADIHAM LEEDS RYCLIFFE ST 48 km (30 miles) to the west of Bradford.
    [Show full text]
  • The M48 Motorway (Junctions 1-2)
    ROAD TRAFFIC: TRAFFIC REGULATION The M48 Motorway (Junctions 1-2) (Severn Bridge High Winds) The M62 Motorway (Junction 8 Westbound Entry Slip Road) (Temporary Restriction and Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No. (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No. 2015/1256. - 2015/1228. - Enabling power: Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, s. 14 Enabling power: Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, s. 14 (1) (a). - (1) (b). - Issued: 26.03.2015. Made: 24.03.2015. Coming into force: Issued: 01.04.2015. Made: 25.03.2015. Coming into force: 12.04.2015. 28.03.2015. Effect: None. Territorial extent & classification: E. Local. - Effect: None. Territorial extent & classification: E. Local. - Available at Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1256/contents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1228/contents/made Non-print Non-print The M62 Motorway (Junction 23 to Junction 24) (Temporary The M50 Motorway (Junction 1 - Junction 4) (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No. 2015/1068. - Enabling power: Restriction and Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No. 2015/1237. - Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, s. 14 (1) (a). - Issued: 18.02.2015. Enabling power: Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, s. 14 (1) (a). - Made: 05.02.2015. Coming into force: 16.02.2015. Effect: None. Issued: 20.04.2015. Made: 23.03.2015. Coming into force: 30.03.2015. Territorial extent & classification: E. Local. - Available at Effect: None. Territorial extent & classification: E. Local. - Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1068/contents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1237/contents/made Non-print Non-print The M62 Motorway (Junction 25 to Junction 26) (Temporary The M53 Motorway (Junctions 4-3 Northbound Carriageway and Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling High Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund Full
    Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 October 2018 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION About the Road Safety Foundation The Road Safety Foundation is a UK charity advocating road casualty reduction through simultaneous action on all three components of the safe road system: roads, vehicles and behaviour. The charity has enabled work across each of these components and has published several reports which have provided the basis of new legislation, government policy or practice. For the last decade, the charity has focused on developing the Safe Systems approach, and in particular leading the establishment of the European Road Assessment Programme (EuroRAP) in the UK and, through EuroRAP, the global UK-based charity International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP). Since the inception of EuroRAP in 1999, the Foundation has been the UK member responsible for managing the programme in the UK (and, more recently, Ireland), ensuring that these countries provide a global model of what can be achieved.
    [Show full text]