DOCSLIB.ORG

Renewable & Low Carbon Energy Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Renewable & Low Carbon Energy Study Renewable and Low Carbon Energy Study Maslen Environmental Addendum Pendle Borough Council: January 2011 Following Pendle Council’s six-week public consultation1 on the findings of the Renewable and Low Carbon Energy Study (Maslen, 2010) the following comments should be noted when reading the study: Section 2.1.1 National Policy and European Context (Page 3) The planning Inspectorate will assume the role of the Infrastructure Planning Commission, following changes introduced in the Decentralisation and Localism Bill, 2010. Section 2.1.3 Local Policy Context (Page 10) In addition to Policy 19, the emerging Rossendale Core Strategy also includes Policy 20: Wind Energy, which sets out the criteria against which wind energy proposals will be assessed. Section 4.1.2 General Constraints (Page 21) The list under ‘Cultural Sensitivies’ should include a reference to ‘Historic Parks and Gardens’. Section 4.1.3 Considering Suitable Locations (Page 22) It should be noted that national policy on heritage assets is set out in Planning Policy Statement 5: Planning for the Historic Environment (PPS5) (Communities & Local Government, March 2010). Section 4.1.3 Considering Suitable Locations – Local Designations (Page 23) Consideration should also be given to ‘non designated heritage assets’ i.e. locally important, but not nationally designated, heritage resources. In some instances satisfactory mitigation of the impact of a proposal, on an environmental or cultural designation, may not be possible. In such cases an application may be refused. Section 4.2.3 Landscape – Wind Energy (Page 31) The Lancashire County Council Landscape Character Assessment has been informed by the historic landscape assessment of Lancashire carried out by the County Archaeology Service, which commenced in January 1999. The project characterised the distinctive, historic dimension of Lancashire’s urban and rural environment and is complementary to this landscape character assessment. Section 4.3 RLC Potential – Energy derived from biomass (Page 42) The Environment Agency advise that there may also be waste licensing considerations for anaerobic digestion and biomass. Section 4.3.2.1 Potential Biodegradable Municipal Waste Streams (Page 45) The Leyland Waste Technology Park (as referred to on page 46) is now known as Farington Waste Recovery Park. 1 17th September to 1st November 2010. Renewable and Low Carbon Energy Study Maslen Environmental Section 4.3.11.2 Technology – Anaerobic Digestion (Page 56) Under ‘Siting and Location’ Constraints, there should be an additional bullet point: • Heritage assets e.g. historic farmsteads Section 4.6.7 Licensing and Consents (Open Loop systems) (Page 73) Discharge consents are now called Environmental Permits. Section 4.7.5 Landscape Sensitivity – Hydropower (Page 85) Land drainage consents are now called Flood Defence Consents. The study states that the “EA are responsible for all main rivers in England” (Page 86). This in incorrect. The responsibility for designated main rivers or ordinary watercourses lies with the riparian landowner. The EA have a right of access and permissive powers to undertake works to main rivers. In relation to works to a watercourse, under the terms of the Water Resources Act 1991 and the Land Drainage Byelaws prior written consent from EA is required for any proposed works or structures in, under, over or within 8 metres of the top of the bank of a designated main river watercourse. For ordinary watercourses consent is required for works which affect the flow of the watercourse. References (Page XIV) Lovejoy, 2005, Landscape Sensitivity to Wind Energy Development in Lancashire, available at http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/landscape/landscapewind/index.asp Maslen Environmental Salts Mill Saltaire Shipley BD18 3LF Maslen Environmental Project Manager Susan Wagstaff Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Initial draft interim Report, Neil Watson, Pendle BC. February 2010 Draft Final Report, April 2010 Neil Watson, Pendle BC. Draft Report May 2010 Addressed feedback comments Neil Watson, Pendle BC Final Report September 2010 Addressed feedback comments Neil Watson, Pendle BC Contract This report describes work commissioned by Pendle Borough council, Planning and Building Control, Town Hall, Market Street, Nelson, BB9 7LG, on behalf of the Partnership of: Pendle Borough Council, Rossendale Borough Council, Burnley Borough Council, Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council and Kirklees Metropolitan Council, by an email dated 14-12- 2009. Pendle Borough Council’s representatives for the contract were Christine Galvin and Neil Watson. Rossendale Borough Council's representative for the contract was Adrian Smith. Burnley Borough Council's representative for the contract was David Hortin. Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council's representative for the contract was John Houston. Kirklees Metropolitan Council's representative for the contract was John Buddle. Alex Jones, Tom Hudson, David Gooch, Andy Wood, Jessica Kennedy, Stephanie Hughes and Susan Wagstaff of Maslen Environmental carried out this work. Technical review was provided by Jo Adlard of CO2 Sense. Prepared by .................................................. Alexander Jones BSc MSc Analyst Prepared by .................................................. David Gooch MA CMLI Senior Analyst Prepared by .................................................. Susan Wagstaff MA MSc C.Geol EurGeol FGS Technical Director Reviewed by ................................................. Steve Maslen BSc MPhil MLI Technical Director 2009s0647 Renewable Energy Strategyv40 i Purpose This document has been prepared as a final draft report for Pendle Borough Council on behalf of the Partnership. Maslen Environmental accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. Maslen Environmental has no liability regarding the use of this report except to the Partnership Councils. 2009s0647 Renewable Energy Strategyv40 ii Acknowledgments Maslen Environmental would like to thank the representatives of the councils for assistance in obtaining data. Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2010 Carbon Footprint 627g A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 627g if 100% post-consumer recycled paper is used and 798g if primary-source paper is used. These figures assume the report is printed in black and white on A4 paper and in duplex. JBA is a carbon neutral company and the carbon emissions from our activities are offset. 2009s0647 Renewable Energy Strategyv40 iii Executive Summary Maslen Environmental were commissioned to undertake a study on the capacity for renewable and low carbon energy in the Partnership councils: Burnley Borough Council, Pendle Borough Council, Rossendale Borough Council, Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council and Kirklees Metropolitan Council, situated in the South Pennines. In particular it was to identify the opportunities for delivering energy from renewable and low carbon (RLC) sources, including micro and district scale technologies, in order to meet both local and site specific targets. The UK has signed up to the EU Renewable Energy Directive, which includes a UK target of 15% of energy from renewable sources by 2020. This is equivalent to a seven-fold increase in the UK renewable energy consumption from 2008 levels. Indicative percentages as to how the government envisages that the 15% target could be fulfilled are: 30% of electricity; 12% heat and 10% transport energy from renewables. This study considers the production of electricity and heat. Since the recent revocation of Regional Spatial Strategies, there are currently no standing regional and sub-regional renewable energy targets. This study has therefore developed local notional targets based on national targets. The notional electricity target is based on 30% of local electricity demand; however contributions from off-shore wind generation could reduce, on-shore local authority electricity generation targets and may lead to future South Pennine Local Authority RLC generation targets being lower than suggested by the notional targets developed in this study. The potential technologies and sources of renewable energy which are assessed through a capacity assessment are summarised in the following table. 2009s0647 Renewable Energy Strategyv40 iv Types of Renewable and Low Carbon Energy Category Sub - category Sub -category level 2 Comment Level 1 Electricity and CHP Large scale (>50 Wind MW) Biomass combustion Municipal solid waste, virgin and recycled timber, energy crops, solid recovered fuel, all biomass co-firing with coal and other wastes. Medium scale (50 Wind kW to 50 MW Biomass combustion Municipal solid waste, virgin and recycled timber, solid recovered fuel. Biomass anaerobic digestion Agricultural waste, food waste, energy crops. Hydro PV Natural Gas CHP Heat use from CHP. Micro scale (<50 Wind kW) Hydro PV Heat only Medium scale (50 Biomass combustion Municipal solid waste, virgin kW to 50 MW) and recycled timber, solid recovered fuel. Biomass anaerobic digestion Injection to gas grid or local use. Solar thermal Water or space heating. Heat pumps (heating and cooling) Ground source, air source, water source. Micro scale (<50 Biomass combustion Virgin and recycled timber. kW) Solar thermal Water or space heating Heat pumps Ground source, air source, water source. Notes. Combined
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rooley Moor Wind Farm Non Technical Summary
    Rooley Moor Wind Farm PROJECT TITLE Non TechnicalSUB Summary TITLE Rooley Moor Wind Farm Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Non-Technical Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 The Applicant .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 The Development Area and its Surroundings ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Description of the Development ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Environmental Statement................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.6 The EIA Project Team..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Site Selection ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pendle Park E-Brochure V2
    FORWARD THINKING BUSINESS WWW.PENDLEPARK.COM Pendle Park is a new commercial business park located of junction 13 (M65) Planning permission granted* for a major new logistics/manufacturing estate of 600,000 sq ft covering 55 acres. Phase 1 - 250,000 sq ft (units from 1,500 - 195,000 sq ft) Phase 2 - Up to 350,000 sq ft (approx.) FORWARD THINKING BUSINESS *Outline Planning Secured (B1,B2,B8). Alternative Uses (Subject to Planning). COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK PENDLE JCT 13 PARK Pendle Park is a major, new, M65 employment site ofering industrial, manufacturing and logistics opportunities. The site can accommodate a single unit of upto 400,000 sq ft on a design and build basis. Phase I ofers a range of smaller units from 1,500-22,500 sq ft as well as 195,000 sq ft which will be ready for occupation in Q2 2022. PHASE 1 Phase 2 will ofer a range of build to suit opportunities up to 350,000 sq ft. A full design team is in place and ready to provide PHASE 2 schemes based on the specific requirements of occupiers. Pendle Park will benefit from a dedicated access of the A665 with new junction. WWW.PENDLEPARK.COM FORWARD THINKING BUSINESS PENDLE PARK © 2021 WWW.PENDLEPARK.COM COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK M65 Jct 13 A6068 LOMESHAYE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE M65 Jct 12 PENDLE PARK © 2021 WWW.PENDLEPARK.COM COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK J 13 B6249 A6068 A56 LOCATION M65 B6249 The site is situated immediately adjacent to Lomeshaye Industrial Estate which is a well established M65 industrial / logistics location.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Profile: Core Strategy
    Wigan Local Development Framework Economy and Employment Evidence Review June 2009 Wigan Council Environmental Services Borough Profile: Core Strategy Contents Title Table Employment A International Lisbon Strategy: Towards a Europe of Innovation and Knowledge A1 Cohesion policy in support of growth and jobs A2 B National Planning for Economic Development B1 Planning for Economic Development NLP Report B2 Employment Land Reviews: Guidance Note B3 Planning for Sustainable Rural Economic Development B4 Developing Entrepreneurship for the Creative Industries B5 The Role of Higher and Further Education Good Practice Guide for Tourism B6 Tomorrow's Tourism Today B7 Measuring Sustainable Tourism at the Local Level B8 The National Statistics Review of Tourism Statistics B9 Property Snapshot – UK Economy & Property Market B10 Planning for Economic Development: A Scoping Study for PPG4 B11 Recession to Recovery – The Local Dimension B12 C Regional Moving Forward - The Northern Way C1 North West Regional Economic Strategy C2 Title Table The North West Employment Land Study C3 North West Ports Economic Trends and Land Use Study C4 Ocean Gateway – A Vision for the North West by Peel Holdings (Draft C5 Prospectus) North West Utilities Infrastructure Study C6 D Sub regional Greater Manchester Economic Strategy 2004/05 – 2006/07 D1 Greater Manchester City Region Development Programme D2 Greater Manchester Skills Analysis and Priorities D3 Demand for Employment Land in Greater Manchester Study D4 The Manchester City Region Knowledge Economy Report D5
    [Show full text]
  • Lune Street, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, Bb12
    On behalf of N J Pask and R J Goode, Joint Fixed Charge Receivers FORMER SUPERMARKET LUNE STREET, PADIHAM, BURNLEY, LANCASHIRE, BB12 8DG SECURE INCOME INVESTMENT GUARANTEED BY CO-OP (12 YEARS UNEXPIRED) FORMER SUPERMARKET LUNE STREET, PADIHAM, BURNLEY, SECURE INCOME INVESTMENT LANCASHIRE, BB12 8DG GUARANTEED BY CO-OP INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS ■ Current rent of £179,885 per annum ■ We are instructed to seek offers in excess of £2,250,000 ■ Prominent town centre former supermarket investment (Two Million, Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Pounds) subject ■ Fixed rental uplifts in June 2021 and ■ Situated in the attractive town of Padiham to contract and exclusive of VAT. This equates to an attractive June 2026, based on 2.25% per annum net initial yield of 7.52% after allowing for purchaser’s costs of ■ The unit comprises a total of 1,023.5 sq m (11,017 sq ft) compounded 5 yearly 6.33%. With the following guaranteed reversions: - of well configured floor space ■ Car parking for 80 cars Date Running Yield ■ Let for a further 12 years (no breaks) to the excellent ■ Freehold June 2021 8.40% covenant of Rochpion Properties (4) LLP, with Co-operative Group Limited as guarantor ■ Site area of 1.18 acres (0.48 hectares) June 2026 9.39% FORMER SUPERMARKET LUNE STREET, PADIHAM, BURNLEY, SECURE INCOME INVESTMENT LANCASHIRE, BB12 8DG GUARANTEED BY CO-OP A687 A65 A61 A19 LANCASTER A59 YORK LOCATION A658 M A65 O M6 A61 O ST Burnley is located in the county of Lancashire, 44 km (27 miles) to the Leeds A64 RRY R UA Bradford E A629 Q A6068 8 A1(M) LA 6 A19 north of Manchester, 17 km (11 miles) to the east of Blackburn and A585 60 E A N N LA E E V BLACKPOOL A59 PADIHAM LEEDS RYCLIFFE ST 48 km (30 miles) to the west of Bradford.
    [Show full text]
  • The M48 Motorway (Junctions 1-2)
    ROAD TRAFFIC: TRAFFIC REGULATION The M48 Motorway (Junctions 1-2) (Severn Bridge High Winds) The M62 Motorway (Junction 8 Westbound Entry Slip Road) (Temporary Restriction and Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No. (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No. 2015/1256. - 2015/1228. - Enabling power: Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, s. 14 Enabling power: Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, s. 14 (1) (a). - (1) (b). - Issued: 26.03.2015. Made: 24.03.2015. Coming into force: Issued: 01.04.2015. Made: 25.03.2015. Coming into force: 12.04.2015. 28.03.2015. Effect: None. Territorial extent & classification: E. Local. - Effect: None. Territorial extent & classification: E. Local. - Available at Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1256/contents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1228/contents/made Non-print Non-print The M62 Motorway (Junction 23 to Junction 24) (Temporary The M50 Motorway (Junction 1 - Junction 4) (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No. 2015/1068. - Enabling power: Restriction and Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No. 2015/1237. - Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, s. 14 (1) (a). - Issued: 18.02.2015. Enabling power: Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, s. 14 (1) (a). - Made: 05.02.2015. Coming into force: 16.02.2015. Effect: None. Issued: 20.04.2015. Made: 23.03.2015. Coming into force: 30.03.2015. Territorial extent & classification: E. Local. - Available at Effect: None. Territorial extent & classification: E. Local. - Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1068/contents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1237/contents/made Non-print Non-print The M62 Motorway (Junction 25 to Junction 26) (Temporary The M53 Motorway (Junctions 4-3 Northbound Carriageway and Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2015 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 6: Strategy for Innovation in RIIO-T2
    SP Energy Networks, RIIO-T2 Business Plan December 2019 Submission Annex 6: Strategy for Innovation in RIIO-T2 SP Energy Networks, RIIO-T2 Business Plan Annex 6: Strategy for Innovation in RIIO-T2 CONTENTS 1 Foreword ............................................................................................................................ 7 2 OUR INNOVATION PORTFOLIO .......................................................................................... 8 2.1 Innovation Focus .............................................................................................................. 8 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 11 3.1 The Changing Energy Landscape .................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Generation is changing……......................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 So is demand….. ........................................................................................................ 12 3.1.3 We Innovate…............................................................................................................ 12 3.2 Development of our strategy ............................................................................................ 13 4 Innovation Strategic Focus ............................................................................................... 15 4.1 Energy System Transition Challenges .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Economic Strategy for Pennine Lancashire Pennine Lancashire Multi Area Agreement | Submission Draft Page A2
    Pennine Lancashire Multi Area Agreement | Submission Draft Appendix A An Integrated Economic Strategy for Pennine Lancashire Pennine Lancashire Multi Area Agreement | Submission Draft Page A2 Contents Executive Summary Section A – Introduction and context A1 Introducing the Integrated Economic Strategy – Pennine Lancashire Today – The Economic Context – The City Regions and the Regional Context – The Productivity and Prosperity Gap – The Pennine Lancashire Output Gap – Skills and Employment: The Fundamental Challenge A2 Pennine Lancashire SWOT analysis A3 The Strategic Framework: RES, LES, SNR A4 A vision for Pennine Lancashire in 2020 Section B – Policy Areas and Strategic Interventions The Strategic Imperative - Bridging the GVA gap B1 Productive and competitive businesses Analysis 1.0 Enterprise, employment, sectors Strategy 1.1 Developing an enterprise culture 1.2 Promoting growth sectors 1.3 Encouraging innovation 1.4 Growing the knowledge economy B2 Skills and training Analysis 2.0 Education, skills (L1-5), occupational profile, forecast change Strategy 2.1 Raising attainment at all levels 2.2 Investing in higher level skills 2.3 Addressing the graduate deficit Pennine Lancashire Multi Area Agreement | Submission Draft Page A3 B3 Economic inclusion and increasing participation Analysis 3.0 Multiple deprivation, worklessness, NEETS Strategy 3.1 Addressing worklessness 3.2 A healthy workforce B4 Regional connectivity and influence Analysis 4.0 Exploiting our proximity to growth centres Strategy 4.1 Promoting a skilled and mobile workforce
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 590 14 January 2015 No. 91 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 14 January 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 849 14 JANUARY 2015 850 tight process. I will publish the draft clauses before House of Commons 25 August—sorry, I mean 25 January, which is, incidentally, before 25 August. With 25 January being a Sunday, we Wednesday 14 January 2015 might even meet the deadline with a few days to spare. Angus Robertson: Until now, the UK Government’s The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock position has been to remove the right of Scottish householders to object to unconventional gas or oil drilling underneath their homes. What will the position PRAYERS be between now and the full devolution of powers over fracking? Will the Department of Energy and Climate [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Change give an undertaking that it will not issue any fresh licences? Mr Carmichael: The position will be as it is at the Oral Answers to Questions moment, which is that if there is any fracking project in Scotland, the hon. Gentleman’s colleagues in the Scottish Government will have the power, using planning or environmental regulations, to block it. They should not SCOTLAND seek to push the blame on to anyone else. The Secretary of State was asked— 11. [906928] Cathy Jamieson (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) (Lab/Co-op): I welcome what the Secretary of State has Shale Gas said.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Making a Better Job of It
    January 2015 Briefing Making a better job of it Why renewables and energy efficiency are better for jobs than fracking Central to the case for fracking in the UK made by the industry and its supporters are claims that it will create many thousands of well-paid jobs for local people. In areas like the North West, these claims are the key reason cited by those local people who support fracking1. But can we take these claims at face value? And would investing in energy efficiency and renewable energy create more jobs? This briefing concludes that: Fracking job creation claims are over-stated, as has often been the case in the US The key report quoted by the industry and its supporters in Government claims that fracking will create over 1,100 jobs per well pad. But peer-reviewed evidence assessing job creation from shale gas extraction in the US (based on how many jobs are created for a given amount of gas extracted) suggests the actual figure could be much lower, with a maximum of around 400 jobs per well pad. In the US, actual job creation from one of the key fields has been less than one-seventh of that claimed in an industry-funded study. Any job creation from fracking is likely to be short-term, whereas the risks posed are long-term Despite the several years of disruption to local people from Cuadrilla’s proposed test-drilling in Lancashire, each site would only support 11 net jobs. And possible job figures quoted for any production phase are peak figures which fall off rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015/0112 Application Type: FULL Proposal: Scout Moor Wind Farm
    Application Number: 2015/0112 Application Type: FULL Proposal: Scout Moor Wind Location: Scout Moor Wind Farm Extension - 16 Farm, Rochdale wind turbines up to 115m to blade tip (14 of which are in Rossendale) and associated ancillary infrastructure Report of: Enplan / Planning Status For Publication Manager Report to: Development Control Date: 1st September 2015 Committee Applicant: Scout Moor Wind Determination Expiry 15th September 2015 Farm Expansion Ltd Date: Agent Turley, 1 New York Street, Manchester, M1 4HD Contact Officer: Mr Andrew Metcalfe Telephone: 01892 545 460 Email: [email protected] REASON FOR REPORTING Outside Officer Scheme of Delegation Yes Member Call-In No Name of Member: Reason for Call-In: 3 or more objections received: Yes Other (please state): Major application with Environmental Assessment Human Rights The relevant provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights have been taken into account in the preparation of this report, particularly the implications arising from the following rights:- Article 8 The right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence. Article 1 of Protocol 1 The right of peaceful enjoyment of possessions and protection of property. Report Structure 1. THE SITE ..........................................................................................................................................................3 2. SITE PLANNING HISTORY ................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Collections Guide 2 Nonconformist Registers
    COLLECTIONS GUIDE 2 NONCONFORMIST REGISTERS Contacting Us What does ‘nonconformist’ mean? Please contact us to book a place A nonconformist is a member of a religious organisation that does not ‘conform’ to the Church of England. People who disagreed with the before visiting our searchrooms. beliefs and practices of the Church of England were also sometimes called ‘dissenters’. The terms incorporates both Protestants (Baptists, WYAS Bradford Methodists, Presbyterians, Independents, Congregationalists, Quakers Margaret McMillan Tower etc.) and Roman Catholics. By 1851, a quarter of the English Prince’s Way population were nonconformists. Bradford BD1 1NN How will I know if my ancestors were nonconformists? Telephone +44 (0)113 535 0152 e. [email protected] It is not always easy to know whether a family was Nonconformist. The 1754 Marriage Act ordered that only marriages which took place in the WYAS Calderdale Church of England were legal. The two exceptions were the marriages Central Library & Archives of Jews and Quakers. Most people, including nonconformists, were Square Road therefore married in their parish church. However, nonconformists often Halifax kept their own records of births or baptisms, and burials. HX1 1QG Telephone +44 (0)113 535 0151 Some people were only members of a nonconformist congregation for e. [email protected] a short time, in which case only a few entries would be ‘missing’ from the Anglican parish registers. Others switched allegiance between WYAS Kirklees different nonconformist denominations. In both cases this can make it Central Library more difficult to recognise them as nonconformists. Princess Alexandra Walk Huddersfield Where can I find nonconformist registers? HD1 2SU Telephone +44 (0)113 535 0150 West Yorkshire Archive Service holds registers from more than a e.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Hydropower
    First Edition, 2011 ISBN 978-93-81157-63-3 © All rights reserved. Published by: The English Press 4735/22 Prakashdeep Bldg, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, Delhi - 110002 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Chapter 1- Introduction to Hydropower Chapter 2 - Tidal Power Chapter 3 - Hydroelectricity Chapter 4 - Run of the River Hydroelectricity Chapter 5 - Pumped-Storage Hydroelectricity Chapter 6 - Small, Micro and Pico Hydro Chapter 7 - Marine Energy Chapter 8 - Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Chapter 9 - Wave Power Chapter- 1 Introduction to Hydropower Saint Anthony Falls, United States. Hydropower, hydraulic power or water power is power that is derived from the force or energy of moving water, which may be harnessed for useful purposes. Prior to the widespread availability of commercial electric power, hydropower was used for irrigation, and operation of various machines, such as watermills, textile machines, sawmills, dock cranes, and domestic lifts. Another method used a trompe to produce compressed air from falling water, which could then be used to power other machinery at a distance from the water. In hydrology, hydropower is manifested in the force of the water on the riverbed and banks of a river. It is particularly powerful when the river is in flood. The force of the water results in the removal of sediment and other materials from the riverbed and banks of the river, causing erosion and other alterations. History Early uses of waterpower date back to Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt, where irrigation has been used since the 6th millennium BC and water clocks had been used since the early 2nd millennium BC.
    [Show full text]