33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) § 165.163

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) § 165.163 § 165.163 33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) TABLE 2 TO § 165.160—Continued • Location: Participants will swim between Manhattan, New York and the shore of Coney Island, New York transiting through the Upper New York Bay, under the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge and south in the Lower New York Bay. The route direction is determined by the predicted tide state and direction of current on the scheduled day of the event. • This Safety Zone includes all waters within a 100-yard radius of each participating swimmer. [USCG–2010–1001, 76 FR 69617, Nov. 9, 2011] points: from the southeast corner of Pier 90, Manhattan, where it intersects § 165.163 Safety Zones; Port of New the seawall, west to approximate posi- York/New Jersey Fleet Week. tion 40°46′10″ N 074°00′13″ W (NAD 1983), (a) The following areas are estab- south to approximate position 40°45′54″ lished as safety zones: N 074°00′25″ W (NAD 1983), then east to (1) Safety Zone A—(i) Location. A mov- the northeast corner of Pier 83 where it ing safety zone for the Parade of Ships intersects the seawall. including all waters 500 yards ahead (ii) Enforcement period. Paragraph and astern, and 200 yards of each side (a)(4)(i) of this section is enforced an- of the designated column of parade ves- nually from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m., from sels as it transits the Port of New York Friday through Monday, Memorial Day and New Jersey from the Verrazano weekend. Narrows Bridge to Riverside State (5) Safety Zone E—(i) Location. A mov- Park on the Hudson River between ing safety zone including all waters 500 West 137th and West 144th Streets, yards ahead and astern, and 200 yards Manhattan. on each side of the departing U.S. Navy (ii) Enforcement period. Paragraph Aircraft or Helicopter Carrier as it (a)(1)(i) of this section is enforced an- transits the Port of New York and New nually from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m. on the Jersey from its mooring at the Intrepid Wednesday before Memorial Day. Sea, Air and Space Museum, Manhat- (2) Safety Zone B—(i) Location. A safe- tan, to the COLREGS Demarcation line ty zone including all waters of the Hud- at Ambrose Channel Entrance Lighted son River between Piers 83 and 90, Man- Bell Buoy 2 (LLNR 34805). hattan, from the parade column east to (ii) Enforcement period. Paragraph the Manhattan shoreline. (a)(5)(i) of this section is enforced an- (ii) Enforcement period. Paragraph nually on the Wednesday following Me- (a)(2)(i) of this section is enforced an- morial Day. Departure time is depend- nually from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m. on the ent on tide, weather, and granting of Wednesday before Memorial Day. authority for departure by the Captain (3) Safety Zone C—(i) Location. A mov- of the Port, New York. ing safety zone including all waters of (b) Effective period. This section is ef- the Hudson River within a 200-yard ra- fective annually from 8 a.m. on the dius of each parade vessel upon its Wednesday before Memorial Day until leaving the parade of ships until it is 4 p.m. on the Wednesday following Me- safely berthed. morial Day. (ii) Enforcement period. Paragraph (c) Regulations. (1) The general regu- (a)(3)(i) of this section is enforced an- lations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 nually from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m. on the apply. Wednesday before Memorial Day. (2) All persons and vessels shall com- (4) Safety Zone D—(i) Location. A safe- ply with the instructions of the Coast ty zone including all waters of the Hud- Guard Captain of the Port or the des- son River bound by the following ignated on-scene-patrol personnel. 676 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:58 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226133 PO 00000 Frm 00686 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226133.XXX 226133 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with CFR Coast Guard, DHS § 165.165 these personnel comprise commis- (5) Location. All waters of the East sioned, warrant, and petty officers of River north of a line drawn from ap- the Coast Guard. Upon being hailed by proximate position 40°44′37″ N, a U. S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, 073°58′16.5″ W (the base of East 35th radio, flashing light, or other means, Street, Manhattan), to approximate po- the operator of a vessel shall proceed sition 40°44′23″ N, 073°57′44.5″ W (Hunters as directed. Point, Long Island City), and south of [CGD1–98–170, 64 FR 24946, May 10, 1999] the Queensboro Bridge. All nautical po- sitions are based on North American § 165.164 Security Zones: Dignitary Ar- Datum of 1983. rival/Departure and United Nations (6) The security zone will be acti- Meetings, New York, NY. vated 30 minutes before the dignitaries’ (a) The following areas are estab- arrival into the zone and remain in ef- lished as security zones: fect until 15 minutes after the dig- (1) Location. Wall Street heliport: All nitaries’ departure from the zone. waters of the East River within the fol- (7) The activation of a particular lowing boundaries: East of a line drawn zone will be announced by facsimile ° ′ ″ between approximate position 40 42 01 and marine information broadcasts. N 074°00′39″ W (east of The Battery) to (b) Regulations. (1) The general regu- 40°41′36″ N 074°00′52″ W (NAD 1983) (point lations contained in 33 CFR 165.33 north of Governors Island) and north of a line drawn from the point north of apply. Governors Island to the southwest cor- (2) All persons and vessels shall com- ner of Pier 7 North, Brooklyn; and ply with the instructions of the Coast south of a line drawn between the Guard Captain of the Port or the des- northeast corner of Pier 13, Manhattan, ignated on-scene-patrol personnel. and the northwest corner of Pier 2 These personnel comprise commis- North, Brooklyn. sioned, warrant, and petty officers of (2) [Reserved] the Coast Guard. Upon being hailed by (3) Location. Marine Air Terminal, La a U.S. Coast Guard vessel using siren, Guardia Airport: All waters of Bowery radio, flashing light, or other means, Bay, Queens, New York, south of a line the operator of a vessel shall proceed drawn from the western end of La as directed. Guardia Airport at approximate posi- ° ′ ″ ° ′ ″ [CGD01–98–006, 64 FR 24948, May 10, 1999, as tion 40 46 47 N 073 53 05 W (NAD 1983) amended by CGD01–00–146, 65 FR 47320, Aug. to the Rikers Island Bridge at approxi- 2, 2000] mate position 40°46′51″ N 073°53′21″ W (NAD 1983) and east of a line drawn be- § 165.165 Regulated Navigation Area; tween the point at the Rikers Island Hudson River South of the Troy Bridge to a point on the shore in Locks, NY. Queens, New York, at approximate po- (a) Regulated navigation area. All nav- ° ′ ″ ° ′ ″ sition 40 46 36 N 073 53 31 W (NAD igable waters of the Hudson River 1983). south of the Troy Locks. (4) Location. All waters of the East (b) The following defini- River bound by the following points: Definitions. 40°44′37″ N, 073°58′16.5″ W (the base of tions apply to this section: East 35th Street, Manhattan), then (1) Designated representative means east to 40°44′34.5″ N, 073°58′10.5″ W any Coast Guard commissioned, war- (about 175 yards offshore of Manhat- rant, or petty officer, or a Federal, tan), then northeasterly to 40°45′29″ N, State, or local law enforcement officer 073°57′26.5″ W (about 125 yards offshore designated by or assisting the Captain of Manhattan at the Queensboro of the Port (COTP) New York. Bridge), then northwesterly to 40°45′31″ (2) Horsepower (HP) means the total N, 073°57′30.5″ W (Manhattan shoreline maximum continuous shaft horsepower at the Queensboro Bridge), then south- of all the vessel’s main propulsion ma- erly to the starting point at 40°44′37″ N, chinery. 073°58′16.5″ W. All nautical positions are (c) Applicability. This section applies based on North American Datum of to tugs with less than 3,000 horsepower 1983. when engaged in towing operations. 677 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:58 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226133 PO 00000 Frm 00687 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226133.XXX 226133 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with CFR.
Recommended publications
  • Region 11: Queens
    t e Road 77th e t r t S et 270th Street wl He 271st Street Langdale Street 269th Street 270th Street 78thAvenue 268th Street 77th Avenue 77th 267th Street 266th Street 76th Avenue 76th 265th Street 79thAvenue 265th Street 264th Street 85thAvenue 263rd Street e 262nd Street u n e v A 261st Street n o t 80thAvenue s Hewlett Street i l 73rd Avenue l 25B i 74th Avenue 74th EF W 60th Road 60th 260th Street t s a 60th Avenue 60th E e d u a 75th Avenue 75th n o 259th Street e 262 R nd Street Av d n h 2 t 7 260th Street 267th Street 7 Langston Avenue 258th Street 5 d 260th Street r a v e 87thAvenue l 266th Street 81stAvenue u 257th Street o t B e 83rdAvenue e e u tr c e S a a u 82ndAvenue s l th n s 5 256th Street e P 5 a v 260th Street 2 e A N 261st Street h u h t t 255th Street n 9 0 e 6 6 2 v 87th Road 58th Avenue A 254th Street h 25 t 4 2 5 th Stre 55th Street 84th Drive Little Neck Parkway et 73rd Road 7 d a Little Neck Parkway e t o 254th Street Bates Road e u R Little Neck Parkway e n e t r e u e t s v n e S r Leith Place d 254th Street 254th Street t e A d 82ndRoad e S 82nd Drive v n e 252nd Street 253rd Street ood e 2 d Glenw u 85th Road A 5 n L n 2 e v h A 252nd Street 2 t l t e t a d r B 253rd Street 6 a 7 e o 252nd Street 8 253rd Street u R 251st Street n d h e i t a e e L u v o n A e e R v le Lan 252nd Street t va h A Brow s 251st Street t e 250th Street 1 7 Elkmont Avenue Elkmont e u 7 5 k n o e r e b 251st Place v e u 60th Avenue n A n m 250th Street e a n P e L y ve c Jericho Turnpike e a a a l e e u l A w m P n u l a k l e h
    [Show full text]
  • Here's a Hint on the Trivia-Like Question Asked Above: the Answer Relates
    Here’s a hint on the trivia-like question asked above: The answer relates to Rikers Island’s leading role in the 1939 birth of LaGuardia Airport. More precisely, it was a rebirth – that of a small North Beach, Queens, airfield, transformed into the country’s then largest municipal airport. Some said it was the world’s largest. What made the change-over possible was a half-mile steel span stretched across Rikers Island Channel. Trucks Traveled Trestle to Feed Rikers Landfill to Airport Site That massive trestle served as a kind of metal feeding tube, enabling an estimated17 million tons of Rikers Island landfill to be funneled into the future mammoth airport’s vast Bowery Bay-Flushing Bay construction site: 357 acres of marshland and underwater grid work. Tens of thousands of truck trips delivered the materials. Operations went on around the clock six days a week for two years. The span had a movable section which, in the open position, allowed passage of water craft through the Rikers Island Channel. Planners had chosen that arrangement rather than clog the channel with barges going back and forth. The crossing structure facilitated turning the 105-acre North Beach Airport, formerly the Glen H. Curtis Airport, into 557-acre New York Municipal Airport-LaGuardia Field. About three and a half decades later, a somewhat similar temporary crossing structure spanned Bowery Bay, linking the island and Queens to facilitate construction of the permanent bridge opened in 1966 and named for Rikers’ Supervising Warden Francis R. Buono in 1978. In recognition of the essential role that Rikers would play in the creation of New York City’s planned commercial airport, the Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW to PAY BAIL in NEW YORK CITY a Step-By-Step Guide
    presents HOW TO PAY BAIL IN NEW YORK CITY A Step-By-Step Guide Hi there! We’re so happy that you’ve decided to join the Dollar Bail Brigade, and help fight mass incarceration by bailing out your fellow New Yorkers! If we’ve just contacted you to bail someone out, then this is the document you need. That person is now your client, and this is a step-by-step guide containing all the information you need to bail them out. It includes: what you need to bring, where you need to go, and how to strategically maneuver through any and all bureaucratic red tape you encounter. Remember: the system thinks it can derail you and distract you. They think they can unjustly keep people in jail, but they don’t know who they’re up against. Thank you, and much love, The Dollar Bail Brigade How to Pay Bail in NYC The Dollar Bail Brigade STEP 1: BEFORE YOU LEAVE Welcome aboard! You are a determined, unstoppable undercover operative of the Dollar Bail Brigade. Here are the things you’ll need for your mission. 1. Find your client otn Department of Corrections Lookup. Print out their “profile,” or copy down all the information from it. You’re going to need this information when you get to the bail window, and you may not be allowed to use your phone once you’re there, so it’s good to have a hard copy to bring along. 2. Print out this document as well! It will be a helpful reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement LUYSTER CREEK ENERGY PROJECT AT THE ASTORIA GENERATING STATION 18-01 20TH AVENUE QUEENS COUNTY ASTORIA, NEW YORK SUBMITTED TO New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Environmental Permits, 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany, New York 12233-1750 Contact Person: Stephen Tomasik (518) 486-9955 APPLICANT Astoria Generating Company, L.P. a USPowerGen Company 300 Atlantic Street, 5th Floor Stamford, Connecticut 06901-3522 PREPARED BY ESS Group, Inc. 401 Wampanoag Trail, Suite 400 East Providence, Rhode Island 02915 ESS Project No. A532-000.02 FILING DATE June 2011 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Luyster Creek Energy Project at the Astoria Generating Station 18-01 20th Avenue, Queens County, Astoria, New York Submitted To: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Environmental Permits 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany, New York 12233-1750 Contact Person: Stephen Tomasik (518) 486-9955 Applicant: Astoria Generating Company, L.P. a USPowerGen Company 300 Atlantic Street, 5th Floor Stamford, Connecticut 06901-3522 Prepared By: ESS Group, Inc. 401 Wampanoag Trail, Suite 400 East Providence, Rhode Island 02915 ESS Project No. A532-000.02 Filing Date: June 2011 ESS Group, Inc. © 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND PUBLIC NEED ........................................................................................ 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Department of Transportation
    INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS East River Bridges A $3.14 billion reconstruction program is underway to rehabilitate all four East River crossings. In 2005, these bridges carried some 498,213 vehicles per day. In 2002, working in coordination with the NYPD and other law enforcement agencies, the Division implemented enhanced security measures on these bridges. This work is ongoing. BROOKLYN BRIDGE The Brooklyn Bridge carried some 132,210 vehicles per day in 2005. The $547 million reconstruction commenced in 1980 with Contract #1, and will continue with Contract #6, currently in the design phase and scheduled for completion in 2013. This contract will include the rehabilitation of both approaches and ramps, the painting of the entire suspension bridge, as well as the seismic retrofitting of the structural elements that are within the Contract #6 project limits. Engineering Landmark Plaque. (Credit: Russell Holcomb) 1899 Plaque Near the Franklin Truss of the Bridge, Marking the Site of George Washington’s First Presidential Mansion, Franklin House. (Credit: Hany Soliman) Historic Landmark, 1954 Reconstruction, and Two Cities Plaques. (1954 & Cities Credit: Michele N. Vulcan) 44 2006 BRIDGES AND TUNNELS ANNUAL CONDITION REPORT INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS The fitting of the remaining bridge elements requiring seismic retrofitting will be carried out under a separate contract by the end of 2013. Work completed on the bridge to date includes reconditioning of the main cables, replacement of the suspenders and cable stays, rehabilitation of the stiffening trusses, and the replacement of the suspended spans deck. The next work scheduled for the bridge is a project to replace the existing travelers with a state of the art technology system.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes
    2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes TM NEW YORK CITY Bill de Blasio Polly Trottenberg Mayor Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Contract C033467 2014-2015: PTDT14D00.E01 2015-2016: PTDT15D00.E01 2016-2017: PTDT16D00.E02 2017-2018: PTDT17D00.E02 The preparation of this report has been financed through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration or the State of New York. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) for providing data used to develop this report. This 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Report was funded through the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council SFY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program project, Data Management PTDT17D00.E02, which was funded through matching grants from the Federal Transit Administration and from the Federal Highway Administration. Title VI Statement The New York Metropolitan Transportation Council is committed to compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and all related rules and statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSDOT Region 11: Queens County 04/14 Principal Arterial Other 06/16 Minor Arterial Regional Scale Bar 07/17 Major Collector
    t e Road 77th e t r t S et 270th Street wl He 271st Street Langdale Street 269th Street 270th Street 78thAvenue 268th Street 77th Avenue 77th 267th Street 266th Street 76th Avenue 76th 265th Street 79thAvenue 265th Street 264th Street 85thAvenue 263rd Street e 262nd Street u 25B n EF e v A 261st Street n o t 80thAvenue s Hewlett Street i l 73rd Avenue l i 74th Avenue 74th W 60th Road 60th 260th Street t s a 60th Avenue 60th E e d u a 75th Avenue 75th n o 259th Street e 262 R nd Street Av d n h 2 t Soundview Drive 7 260th Street 267th Street 7 Langston Avenue 258th Street 5 d 260th Street r a v e 87thAvenue l 266th Street 81stAvenue u 257th Street Overlook Road o t B e 83rdAvenue e e u tr c e S Upland Road a a u 82ndAvenue s l th n s 5 256th Street e P 5 a v 260th Street 2 e A N 261st Street h u h t t 255th Street n 9 0 e 6 6 2 v 87th Road 58th Avenue A 254th Street Oakley Place Oakley h 25 t 4 2 5 th Stre 55th Street 84th Drive Little Neck Parkway et 73rd Road 7 d a Little Neck Parkway e t o 254th Street Bates Road e u R Little Neck Parkway e n e t r e u e t s v n e S r Leith Place d 254th Street 254th Street t e A d 82ndRoad e S 82nd Drive v n e 252nd Street 253rd Street ood e 2 d Glenw u 85th Road A 5 n L n 2 e v h A 252nd Street 2 t l t e t a d r B 253rd Street 6 a 7 e o 252nd Street 8 253rd Street u R 251st Street n d h e i t a e e L u v o n A e e R v le Lan 252nd Street t va h A Brow s 251st Street t e 250th Street 1 7 Elkmont Avenue Elkmont e u 7 5 k n o e r e y b 251st Place v e u a 60th Avenue n A n m 250th Street w e a s n P
    [Show full text]
  • Closerikers Campaign: August 2015 – August 2017
    Reflections and Lessons from the First Two Phases of the #CLOSErikers Campaign: August 2015 – August 2017 JANUARY 2018 This paper was produced by the Katal Center for Health, Equity, and Justice. The views, conclusions, and recommendations outlined here are those of Katal and do not represent other organizations involved in the #CLOSErikers campaign. No dedicated funding was used to create this paper. For inquiries, please contact gabriel sayegh, Melody Lee, and Lorenzo Jones at [email protected]. © Katal Center for Health, Equity, and Justice 2017. All rights reserved. Katal encourages the dissemination of content from this publication with the condition that reference is made to the source. Suggested Citation Katal Center for Health, Equity, and Justice, Reflections and Lessons from the First Two Phases of the #CLOSErikers Campaign: August 2015–August 2017, (New York: Katal, 2018). Contents Introduction 4 A Brief History of Rikers and Previous Efforts to Shut It Down 6 Political Context and Local Dynamics 8 Movement to End Stop-and-Frisk and Marijuana Arrests 8 Police Killings and #BlackLivesMatter 9 A Scathing Federal Report on Conditions for Youth on Rikers 10 Kalief Browder: Another Rikers Tragedy 11 The National Political Landscape: 2012–2016 11 Media Focus on the Crisis at Rikers 12 A Strategy to #CLOSErikers 13 Campaign Structure and Development 15 Phase One: Building the Campaign and Demand to Close Rikers 15 First Citywide Campaign Meeting 17 Completing Phase One and Preparing for Phase Two 18 First #CLOSErikers Sign-on Letter
    [Show full text]
  • Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan
    Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan NYC Department of City Planning • 2006 Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Queens East River and North Shore Greenway Master Plan New York City Department of City Planning New York City Department of Parks & Recreation 2006 2006 • NYC Department of Parks & Recreation Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Project PIN X500.97 The preparation of this report was fi nanced in part through funds from the U.S.Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report refl ect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented within. The contents do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specifi cation, or regulation. NYC Department of City Planning • 2006 Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Project Description ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes
    2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes TM NEW YORK CITY Bill de Blasio Polly Trottenberg Mayor Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council 2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Contract C033467 2014-2015: PTDT14D00.E01 2015-2016: PTDT15D00.E01 The preparation of this report was financed in part with funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, under the Federal Highway Act of 1956, as amended, and the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. This document is disseminated by the New York City Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. It reflects the views of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The report does not necessarily reflect any official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, or the State of New York. The report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) for providing data used to develop this report. Prepared by: New York City Department of Transportation Polly Trottenberg Commissioner Margaret Forgione Chief Operating Officer Joseph Jarrin, Executive Deputy Commissioner for Strategic and Agency Services Ryan Russo Deputy Commissioner Charles Ukegbu, Assistant Commissioner, Regional & Strategic Planning Naim Rasheed Senior Director, Traffic Engineering & Planning Alexander M. Keating Director of Special Projects Richard P. Roan Special Projects Danny Yoder Special Projects Published October 2016 2015 NEW YORK CITY BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUMES 2,661,105 5.8% Decrease (‐6,428 Daily vehicles per day used the 47 toll‐free Vehicles) bridges monitored by the New York City Department of Transportation in Williamsburg Bridge over the East 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes 2005
    NEW YORK CITY BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUMES 2005 The City of New York Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor NEW YORK CITY New York City Department of Transportation Iris Weinshall, Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council August 2006 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes 2005 Contract D000642 2005-2006: PTDT05P00.01 2006-2007: PTDT06P00.01 The preparation of this report was financed in part with funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, under the Federal Highway Act of 1956, as amended, and the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. This document is disseminated by the New York City Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. It reflects the views of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The report does not necessarily reflect any official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, or the State of New York. The report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), for providing data used to develop this report. Prepared by: New York City Department of Transportation Iris Weinshall Commissioner Judith E. Bergtraum First Deputy Commissioner David Woloch Deputy Commissioner/Senior Policy Advisor Michael Primeggia Deputy Commissioner Naim Rasheed Director, Traffic Planning Ann Marie Sledge-Doherty Deputy Director, Traffic Planning Richard P. Roan Traffic Planning TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION . 7 SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • New York City 2018 Trip Report
    New York City 2018 Urban Health Scholars Immersion trip Rikers Island New York City Department of Corrections By Sand Mastrangelo The Urban Health Scholars trip to New York City began a little earlier than expected this January due to a projected snowstorm in the New York Metro Area during scholars’ anticipated time of arrival! So, on Wednesday evening, sixteen Urban Health Scholars hurriedly packed their bags and drove to an AirBNB in Central Harlem to avoid driving in inclement weather. Early Thursday morning, eight members geared up to brave the storm and made their way to the Rikers Island Bridge in Queens for a guided tour of the jail with staff psychiatrist, Dr. Lauren Stossel. Visibility was low and the winds were powerful so drivers were extra cautious during the ride over. Once scholars obtained security clearance and proper badge identification, they packed into a State Corrections Van and made their way onto the Island. For geographic context, Rikers Island is New York City’s main jail complex located on the East River between Queens and mainland Bronx and is home to one of the world’s largest correctional and mental institutions. Though scholars couldn’t appreciate the vastness of the ten-jail complex due to the weather, Dr. Stossel provided a brief orientation and overview of the various buildings operated by the NYC Department of Corrections. Once inside, scholars were guided through medical intake, where all prison detainees undergo an initial medical screening within 24 hours of arrival. While there was not an opportunity to interact with a medical provider directly, scholars observed a typical exam room and learned about the various health conditions physicians and health staff typically support.
    [Show full text]