DOCSLIB.ORG

New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes 2005 NEW YORK CITY BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUMES 2005 The City of New York Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor NEW YORK CITY New York City Department of Transportation Iris Weinshall, Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council August 2006 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes 2005 Contract D000642 2005-2006: PTDT05P00.01 2006-2007: PTDT06P00.01 The preparation of this report was financed in part with funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, under the Federal Highway Act of 1956, as amended, and the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. This document is disseminated by the New York City Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. It reflects the views of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The report does not necessarily reflect any official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, or the State of New York. The report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), for providing data used to develop this report. Prepared by: New York City Department of Transportation Iris Weinshall Commissioner Judith E. Bergtraum First Deputy Commissioner David Woloch Deputy Commissioner/Senior Policy Advisor Michael Primeggia Deputy Commissioner Naim Rasheed Director, Traffic Planning Ann Marie Sledge-Doherty Deputy Director, Traffic Planning Richard P. Roan Traffic Planning TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION . 7 SUMMARY . 10 2005 Volumes . 10 Major Increases . 10 Major Decreases . 10 Ten-Year Trends: 1995 - 2005 . 11 Historic Trends . 11 Major Bridge Reconstruction in 2005 . 12 New York City Bridges Map . 25 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 . 27 7am - 7pm Vehicle Classification in 2005 . 30 Traffic Volume Trends 2004 - 2005 . 32 10-Year Traffic Growth Rate Trends 1955 - 2005 . 35 EAST RIVER BRIDGES . 38 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 . 39 Brooklyn . 40 Manhattan . 41 Queensboro . 42 Williamsburg . 43 HARLEM RIVER BRIDGES . 44 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 . 45 Alexander Hamilton . 47 PAGE Broadway . 48 Macombs Dam . 49 Madison Avenue . 50 Third Avenue . 51 University Heights . 52 Washington . 53 Willis Avenue . 54 145th Street . 55 BROOKLYN-QUEENS BRIDGES . 56 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 . 57 Grand Street . 58 Greenpoint Avenue . 59 Kosciuszko . 60 Pulaski . 61 BRONX BRIDGES . 62 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 . 63 City Island . 65 East 174th Street . 66 Eastchester . 67 Eastern Boulevard . 68 Hutchinson River Parkway . 69 Pelham . 70 PAGE Unionport . 71 Westchester Avenue . 72 BROOKLYN BRIDGES . 73 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 . 74 Carroll Street . 76 Cropsey Avenue . 77 Hamilton Avenue . 78 Metropolitan Avenue . 79 Mill Basin . 80 Ninth Street . 81 Stillwell Avenue . 82 Third Avenue . 83 Third Street . 84 Union Street . 85 QUEENS BRIDGES . 86 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 . 87 Borden Avenue . 89 Flushing . 90 Hook Creek . 91 Hunter's Point . 92 Little Neck . 93 Midtown Highway . 94 PAGE North Channel . 95 Rikers Island . 96 Roosevelt Avenue . 97 Roosevelt Island . 98 Whitestone Expressway . 99 STATEN ISLAND BRIDGES . 100 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 . 101 Fresh Kills . 102 MTA BRIDGES AND TUNNELS FACILITIES . 103 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 -2005 Manhattan Facilities . 104 Outer Borough Facilities . 105 2005 Hourly Volumes Manhattan Facilities . 106 Outer Borough Facilities . 107 PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY FACILITIES . 108 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1948 - 2005 Manhattan Facilities . 109 Outer Borough Bridges . 110 2005 Hourly Volumes Manhattan Facilities . 111 Outer Borough Bridges . 112 Introduction INTRODUCTION The 2005 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes report is an annual publication prepared by the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), and funded by the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), and the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21). Since 1948, the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) has monitored traffic flow on 47 bridges operated by the City of New York. This 2005 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes report summarizes vehicular volumes, classification data, and trends for the 47 bridges that cross over water. Volume and trend information also is presented for the nine bridges and tunnels operated by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), and the six bridges and tunnels operated by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ). All bridges are monitored with automatic traffic recording (ATR) machines. Hourly volumes by direction for each bridge are presented in tabular form. Graphical presentations of the hourly volumes by direction are provided by histograms. Hourly classification data identifies the volumes of automobiles, buses, commuter vans, trucks, and commercial vans for the 7am-7pm time period. A regression analysis of the total daily volumes for each facility for the years 1948-2005 was performed in order to develop trend information. In addition, changes in the traffic volumes for all facilities over the past 57 years are shown in graphical form. The report presents annual growth rates for each bridge. These growth rates are derived from the linear regression equation, which reflects the best fitting straight line for the data plotted. A more comprehensive analysis of bridges and tunnels serving Manhattan is presented in the Manhattan River Crossings report which also is published annually. The 47 New York City bridges and the MTABT and PANYNJ facilities have been designated a highway functional classification. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service each roadway provides. The five functional systems are defined as follows: 1. Interstate - connects population centers across state lines. 2. Principal Arterial - serves major centers of activity of an urban area and carries a high proportion of the total urban area travel on a minimum of mileage. 3. Minor Arterial - interconnects with and augments urban principal arterials; provides service for trips of moderate length at a somewhat lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials; distributes travel to geographic areas smaller than those identified with the higher system..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Drawingboard
    The Drawingboard September 2006 Volume 6, Number 9 In This Issue President’s Message • President’s Message By Brian Flynn, P.E. President • Next Meeting – Sept 28th @ 6:30PM Welcome back, I hope everyone took some time to enjoy the sumer weather. It was a wonderful summer marred only by the • UPDATE – Dept. of Buildings Park's Department last minute cancellation of the PDC Picnic in News Brief August. Now that fall has arrived, we are back in full swing with • Useful Websites for Engineers our schedule of Chapter Meetings and events. This month's • Profile of an Engineer meeting promises to be very interesting with our sponsor Hilti discussing Firestopping techniques. As you all know Professional • 2006 Meeting Schedule Development Hours (PDH's) are available for free to our • Professional Directory and members at all of our meetings every month. In addition, the Sponsors PDC has a lecture series for additional PDH's every month as • PIE August Newsletter well. The next lecture on Tuesday, October 17 will most likely (attached) feature Tim Lynch, PE of the Building Department's Forensic Unit to discuss shoring and underpinning. I would like to announce the appointment of several individuals Board of Directors to head chapter committees. First is Sal Galletta, PE who will Brian Flynn, President head our Committee for Political Action to spear head actions to P.E. (718) 707-0416 promote licensed engineering, including the proposed resolution George L. to create a position of Deputy Mayor for Infrastructure, who is a 1ST Vice Pres. Tavoulareas, licensed engineer or registered architect.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations & Accomplishments
    INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS East River Bridges A $2.8 billion reconstruction program is underway to rehabilitate all four East River crossings. In 2002, these bridges carried some 467,080 vehicles per day. In 2002, working in coordination with the NYPD and other law enforcement agencies, the Division implemented enhanced security measures on these bridges. This work is ongoing. BROOKLYN BRIDGE The Brooklyn Bridge carried some 121,145 vehicles per day in 2002. The $467 million reconstruction commenced in 1980 with Contract #1, will continue with Contract #6, currently in the design phase and scheduled for completion in 2012, and will end with a seismic retrofit of the bridge, slated for completion in 2013. Work completed on the bridge to date includes reconditioning of the main cables, replacement of the suspenders and cable stays, rehabilitation of the stiffening trusses, and the replacement of the suspended spans deck. The next work scheduled for the bridge is a project to replace the existing travelers with a state of the art technology system. Construction is scheduled to begin in the spring of 2005 and conclude in the spring of 2007. Brooklyn Bridge in 1909 Pedestrian Vibration Study The major blackout of August 14, 2003 forced City officials to close the bridge to vehicular traffic and open the entire bridge to pedestrians. During this mass exodus, several pedestrians reported that the bridge was vibrating and thus causing them great anxiety. At the request of the Office of Emergency Management, an emergency inspection of the bridge was performed that evening as a result of these complaints of “swaying”; no structural problems were found.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 148/Tuesday, August 1, 2000/Rules
    46870 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 1, 2000 / Rules and Regulations significant economic impact on a Civil Justice Reform Dated: July 19, 2000. substantial number of small entities. G.N. Naccara, ``Small entities'' comprises small This rule meets applicable standards Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, businesses, not-for-profit organizations in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive First Coast Guard District. that are independently owned and Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to [FR Doc. 00±19396 Filed 7±31±00; 8:45 am] operated and are not dominant in their minimize litigation, eliminate BILLING CODE 4910±15±P fields, and governmental jurisdictions ambiguity, and reduce burden. with populations less than 50,000. Protection of Children The Coast Guard certifies under 5 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have We have analyzed this rule under a significant economic impact on a Executive Order 13045, Protection of Coast Guard substantial number of small entities. Children from Environmental Health 33 CFR Part 117 This conclusion is based on the fact that Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not three of the bridges presently open after an economically significant rule and a six-hour notice May 1 through does not concern an environmental risk [CGD01±99±069] September 30, which is greater than the to health or risk to safety that may proposed two-hour notice during those disproportionately affect children. RIN 2115±AE47 five months. The Coast Guard believes that the Environment Drawbridge Operation Regulations: two-hour advance notice October 1 Newtown Creek, Dutch Kills, English The Coast Guard considered the through April 30 is reasonable because Kills and their tributaries, New York the bridges will still open on signal environmental impact of this rule and provided the two-hour notice is given.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at Bridges: a Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture Cody Chase Connecticut College
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Architectural Studies Integrative Projects Art History and Architectural Studies 2015 A Look at Bridges: A Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture Cody Chase Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/archstudintproj Recommended Citation Chase, Cody, "A Look at Bridges: A Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture" (2015). Architectural Studies Integrative Projects. Paper 73. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/archstudintproj/73 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art History and Architectural Studies at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architectural Studies Integrative Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. CODY CHASE SENIOR INTEGRATIVE PROJECT: INDEPENDENT STUDY ARCHITECTURAL STUDIES CONNECTICUT COLLEGE 2015 A"LOOK"INTO"BRIDGES" A"Study"of"Types,"Histories,"and"the"Marriage"of" Engineering"and"Architecture" " Cody"Chase"‘15" Architectural"Studies"Major,"Art"History"Minor" Senior"IntegraHve"Project" " Why Bridges? Where to begin? TYPES OTHER • Arch • Glossary • Beam/Girder/Stringer • Materials • Truss • History of Failures • Suspension • Models • Cable-Stayed • Moveable Span What makes a bridge stand up? FORCES ***Compression:
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the MTBTA Verrazano-Narrows Bridge Construction Photograph Collection
    A Guide to the MTBTA Verrazano-Narrows Bridge Construction Photograph Collection TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview of the Collection Administrative Information Restrictions Administrative History Scope & Content Note Index Terms Series Description & Container Listing Archives & Special Collections College of Staten Island Library, CUNY 2800 Victory Blvd., 1L-216 Staten Island, NY 10314 © 2005 The College of Staten Island, CUNY Overview of the Collection Collection #: IC 1 Title: MTBTA Verrazano-Narrows Bridge Construction Photograph Collection Creator: Metropolitan Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Association Dates: 1960-1964 Extent: Abstract: This collection contains eleven photographs of the construction of the Verrazano- Narrows bridge. Administrative Information Preferred Citation MTBTA Verrazano-Narrows Bridge Construction Photograph Collection, Archives & Special Collections, Department of the Library, College of Staten Island, CUNY, Staten Island, New York. Acquisition These photographs were donated to the CSI Archives & Special Collections on October 26th, 2004 following their use in an exhibition at the college. Processing Information Restrictions Access Access to this record group is unrestricted. Copyright Notice The researcher assumes full responsibility for compliance with laws of copyright. The images are still the property of their creators, and requests for or use in publications should be directed to the Administrator of the MTA Special Archive, Laura Rosen. Laura Rosen Administrator, Special Archive MTBTA 2 Broadway, 22nd Floor New York, NY 646-252-7418 Administrative History The Verrazano-Narrows bridge was constructed in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, and was completed in November of 1964. It was built to permit the movement of vehicular traffic between Staten Island and Brooklyn and link parts of the Interstate Highway System.
    [Show full text]
  • Region 11: Queens
    t e Road 77th e t r t S et 270th Street wl He 271st Street Langdale Street 269th Street 270th Street 78thAvenue 268th Street 77th Avenue 77th 267th Street 266th Street 76th Avenue 76th 265th Street 79thAvenue 265th Street 264th Street 85thAvenue 263rd Street e 262nd Street u n e v A 261st Street n o t 80thAvenue s Hewlett Street i l 73rd Avenue l 25B i 74th Avenue 74th EF W 60th Road 60th 260th Street t s a 60th Avenue 60th E e d u a 75th Avenue 75th n o 259th Street e 262 R nd Street Av d n h 2 t 7 260th Street 267th Street 7 Langston Avenue 258th Street 5 d 260th Street r a v e 87thAvenue l 266th Street 81stAvenue u 257th Street o t B e 83rdAvenue e e u tr c e S a a u 82ndAvenue s l th n s 5 256th Street e P 5 a v 260th Street 2 e A N 261st Street h u h t t 255th Street n 9 0 e 6 6 2 v 87th Road 58th Avenue A 254th Street h 25 t 4 2 5 th Stre 55th Street 84th Drive Little Neck Parkway et 73rd Road 7 d a Little Neck Parkway e t o 254th Street Bates Road e u R Little Neck Parkway e n e t r e u e t s v n e S r Leith Place d 254th Street 254th Street t e A d 82ndRoad e S 82nd Drive v n e 252nd Street 253rd Street ood e 2 d Glenw u 85th Road A 5 n L n 2 e v h A 252nd Street 2 t l t e t a d r B 253rd Street 6 a 7 e o 252nd Street 8 253rd Street u R 251st Street n d h e i t a e e L u v o n A e e R v le Lan 252nd Street t va h A Brow s 251st Street t e 250th Street 1 7 Elkmont Avenue Elkmont e u 7 5 k n o e r e b 251st Place v e u 60th Avenue n A n m 250th Street e a n P e L y ve c Jericho Turnpike e a a a l e e u l A w m P n u l a k l e h
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Three Wonder Walks
    Three Wonder Walks (After the High Line) Featuring Walking Routes, Collections and Notes by Matthew Jensen Three Wonder Walks (After the High Line) The High Line has proven that you can create a des- tination around the act of walking. The park provides a museum-like setting where plants and flowers are intensely celebrated. Walking on the High Line is part of a memorable adventure for so many visitors to New York City. It is not, however, a place where you can wander: you can go forward and back, enter and exit, sit and stand (off to the side). Almost everything within view is carefully planned and immaculately cultivated. The only exception to that rule is in the Western Rail Yards section, or “W.R.Y.” for short, where two stretch- es of “original” green remain steadfast holdouts. It is here—along rusty tracks running over rotting wooden railroad ties, braced by white marble riprap—where a persistent growth of naturally occurring flora can be found. Wild cherry, various types of apple, tiny junipers, bittersweet, Queen Anne’s lace, goldenrod, mullein, Indian hemp, and dozens of wildflowers, grasses, and mosses have all made a home for them- selves. I believe they have squatters’ rights and should be allowed to stay. Their persistence created a green corridor out of an abandoned railway in the first place. I find the terrain intensely familiar and repre- sentative of the kinds of landscapes that can be found when wandering down footpaths that start where streets and sidewalks end. This guide presents three similarly wild landscapes at the beautiful fringes of New York City: places with big skies, ocean views, abun- dant nature, many footpaths, and colorful histories.
    [Show full text]
  • $223,355,000 Triborough Bridge and TUNNEL Authority Lehman
    NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY $223,355,000 TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AutHORITY (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) General Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A DATED: Date of Delivery DUE: November 15, as shown on the inside cover The Series 2007A Bonds are being issued to finance bridge and tunnel projects. The Series 2007A Bonds – • are general obligations of MTA Bridges and Tunnels, payable generally from the net revenues collected on the bridges and tunnels operated by MTA Bridges and Tunnels as described herein, and • are not a debt of the State or The City of New York or any other local government unit. MTA Bridges and Tunnels has no taxing power. In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel to MTA Bridges and Tunnels, under existing law and relying on certain representations by MTA Bridges and Tunnels and assuming the compliance by MTA Bridges and Tunnels with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2007A Bonds is • excluded from a bondholder’s federal gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, • not a preference item for a bondholder under the federal alternative minimum tax, and • included in the adjusted current earnings of a corporation under the federal corporate alternative minimum tax. Also in Bond Counsel’s opinion, under existing law, interest on the Series 2007A Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of New York State or any political subdivisions of the State, including The City of New York. The Series 2007A Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as described herein. The Series 2007A Bonds are offered when, as, and if issued, subject to certain conditions, and are expected to be delivered through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company, on or about June 20, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 NYC Bridge and Screenline Traffic Volumes Dashboard Metadata
    NYC Bridge and Screenline Traffic Volumes Dashboard Metadata Data Methodology Vehicular traffic volumes are collected annually for a two week period either during the fall months of September, October, and November or during the spring months of March, April, May, and June. Most of these traffic volumes are collected using Automated Traffic Recorders (ATRs), which record each vehicle as it passes over a pneumatic tube. A small percentage are collected using cameras. Average hourly volumes and an average daily volume are calculated from valid midweek days (Tuesday through Thursday). Dashboard Visuals The line graph on the “Average Daily Traffic Volumes per Facility per Year” page (page 1 of 2) represents a bidirectional (where applicable) average daily volume per location dating back to 1981 for most locations. The line graph on the “Average Hourly Traffic Volumes per Facility” page (page 2 of 2) represents the average bidirectional (where applicable) hourly volumes per location. This graph displays the end of the hour for each traffic volume on the x axis. For example, in the year of 2019 for Brooklyn Bridge, the traffic volume of 7,931 occurs during the 11:00 PM to 12:00 AM time period. Similarly, the traffic volume of 5,333 occurs during the 12:00 AM to 1:00 PM time period, and so on. The "Group" and the "Facility" filters will apply to both graphs. The "Year" filter will only alter the "Average Hourly Traffic Volumes per Facility" line graph. Each graph can display a maximum of only 60 facilities (lines) due to a limitation with Power BI.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges and Tunnels Committee Meeting
    Bridges and Tunnels Committee Meeting May 2020 Committee Members L. Lacewell, Chair D. Mack, Vice Chair N. Brown R. Glucksman K. Law J. Samuelsen L. Schwartz V. Tessitore N. Zuckerman Bridges & Tunnels Committee Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, 5/20/2020 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 1. Summary of Actions - None 2. Public Comments 3. B&T Minutes of Committee Meetings and Board Meeting - April 2020 B&T Minutes of Committees and Board Meeting - April 2020 - Page 3 4. Committee Work Plan B&T Committee Work Plan - Page 23 5. Report on Operations - March 2020 B&T Report on Operations - March 2020 - Page 30 6. Safety Report - March 2020 B&T Safety Report - March 2020 - Page 45 7. Final Review of 2019 Year-End Operating Results B&T Final Review of 2019 Year-End Operating Results - Page 50 8. Capital Program Project Status Report - April 2020 B&T Capital Program Project Status Report - April 2020 - Page 74 9. Procurements - None 10. Diversity Report - First Quarter 2020 B&T Diversity Report - First Quarter 2020 - Page 80 Minutes of Committees and Board Meeting – April 2020 ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 3 of 95 - Bridges & Tunnels Committee Meeting 5/20/2020 Joint Committee and Board Meeting of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the New York City Transit Authority, the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, the Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority, the Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, the Long Island Rail Road Company, the Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, MTA Construction & Development, the MTA Bus Company and the First Mutual Transportation Assurance Company Minutes 2 Broadway New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, April 22, 2020 10:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Hourly Traffic on Bridges and Tunnels Dataset Overview
    Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Hourly Traffic on Bridges and Tunnels Dataset Overview General Description MTA Bridges and Tunnels Created in 1933 by Robert Moses, MTA Bridges and Tunnels serves more than 800,000 vehicles each weekday — nearly 290 million vehicles each year — and carries more traffic than any other bridge and tunnel authority in the nation. All are within New York City, and all accept payment by E-ZPass, an electronic toll collection system that is moving traffic through MTA Bridges and Tunnels toll plazas faster and more efficiently. MTA Bridges and Tunnels is a cofounder of the E-ZPass Interagency Group, which has implemented seamless toll collection in 14 states, including New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, and West Virginia; tolls are charged electronically to a single E-ZPass account. See also: http://web.mta.info/mta/network.htm This dataset provides data showing the number of vehicles (including cars, buses, trucks and motorcycles) that pass through each of the nine bridges and tunnels operated by the MTA each hour. The dataset includes Plaza ID, Date, Hour, Direction, # Vehicles using EZ Pass, and # Vehicles using cash. Data Collection Methodology This data is collected on a weekly basis. The data is extracted directly from the EZ-Pass system database. Statistical and Analytic Issues Only in-bound (Staten Island-bound) traffic over the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge is collected. The column labeled ETC refers to electronic toll collection. This is the number of vehicles that pass through each bridge or tunnel's toll plaza using E-ZPass.
    [Show full text]
  • Here's a Hint on the Trivia-Like Question Asked Above: the Answer Relates
    Here’s a hint on the trivia-like question asked above: The answer relates to Rikers Island’s leading role in the 1939 birth of LaGuardia Airport. More precisely, it was a rebirth – that of a small North Beach, Queens, airfield, transformed into the country’s then largest municipal airport. Some said it was the world’s largest. What made the change-over possible was a half-mile steel span stretched across Rikers Island Channel. Trucks Traveled Trestle to Feed Rikers Landfill to Airport Site That massive trestle served as a kind of metal feeding tube, enabling an estimated17 million tons of Rikers Island landfill to be funneled into the future mammoth airport’s vast Bowery Bay-Flushing Bay construction site: 357 acres of marshland and underwater grid work. Tens of thousands of truck trips delivered the materials. Operations went on around the clock six days a week for two years. The span had a movable section which, in the open position, allowed passage of water craft through the Rikers Island Channel. Planners had chosen that arrangement rather than clog the channel with barges going back and forth. The crossing structure facilitated turning the 105-acre North Beach Airport, formerly the Glen H. Curtis Airport, into 557-acre New York Municipal Airport-LaGuardia Field. About three and a half decades later, a somewhat similar temporary crossing structure spanned Bowery Bay, linking the island and Queens to facilitate construction of the permanent bridge opened in 1966 and named for Rikers’ Supervising Warden Francis R. Buono in 1978. In recognition of the essential role that Rikers would play in the creation of New York City’s planned commercial airport, the Sept.
    [Show full text]