DOCSLIB.ORG

“Fate Did Not Hand Genghis Khan His Destiny; He Made It for Himself.”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Fate Did Not Hand Genghis Khan His Destiny; He Made It for Himself.” “Fate did not hand Genghis Khan his destiny; he made it for himself.” •Born with a blood clot in his hand, Temujin of the Borjigin or Blue Wolves, was a man born to the harsh steppes of Mongolia. •The Mongolian steppes determine their way of life as pastoralists,(people who herd domesticated animals), herders and raiders. •They formed kinship groups called a clan. •Yesugei, his father, was poisoned. •Yesugei’s 7 children, plus his 2 wives were abandoned to die by the tribe. •At one point, Temujin was enslaved by another tribe. Scene from the movie “Mongol” where the boy is captured and enslaved. •At 16, he married Borte, the love of his life. •After 3 months of marriage, Borte was kidnapped. •This forever placed Temujin on the path of the warrior. •He led a raid and Scene from the movie “Mongol” where rescued Borte. Borte is captured by the Merkits. •By 1206 AD, he had conquered every tribe on the steppes. •He was elected and blessed – and renamed “Genghis Khan” or Universal Artist’s rendering of Genghis Ruler.” Khan and his bow. •He appointed people based on loyalty and achievement to leadership positions. •He expanded and protected the merchants along the Silk Roads. •In his Great Law, he supported free trade and religious tolerance. “Archery won Genghis Khan his empire.” Author Conn Iggulden •Mongols were good horseman and archers. •They carried the Mongolian double-curved bow. It’s draw strength would not be equaled by Europeans for another 200 years. •Draw strength = “the ability to lift 2 men in the air, at a full gallop, on 2 fingers.” •Mongol warriors were fast riders, with modern armor. •They were tough, and able to travel light, living on mare’s milk or blood to survive. •Finally, the stirrup allowed them to stand and shoot or free up their sword arm for use. •Warfare became an intercontinental affair fought on multiple fronts, that stretched for thousands of miles. –Author, Jack Weatherford •The Mongols invaded China, SW Asia, Europe, and India. •In 1215 AD, he began his conquest of China. China had great wealth and access to money and trade from the Silk Roads. •21 years later, he secured China. •By 1260, it was called the Khanate of the Great Khan and ruled by the Yuan Dynasty – a Mongol Dynasty, led by his grandson Kublai Khan. Why attack SW ASIA? •In 1215 AD, his trade caravan of 500 men were attacked and killed, their goods taken by the Mayor of Utrar. •Genghis Khan then sent Mongolian ambassadors directly to the Sultan of Khwarizm for justice. •The Sultan shaved and beheaded Khan’s envoys, leaving 1 man alive to return to Genghis Khan with the story. •Genghis Khan was in his 60’s, but he immediately moved on this next Scene from the film attack. “Mongol.” “In retribution for every hair on their heads it seemed that a 100,000 heads rolled in the dust.” –Court historian •The “Jewel of Islam” the city of Bukhara and the cities of Utrar and Samarkand were razed to the ground by angry Mongol warriors led by Genghis Khan. •Libraries/buildings were destroyed and people were slaughtered. “I am the punishment of God…If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.” –Genghis Khan •The Sultan fled. •Genghis Khan pushed hard into the Sultan’s Persian empire – taking Afghanistan and Baghdad. •2 of G. Khan’s generals led 40,000 warriors to find the Sultan, and ended up taking Azerbaijan, Armenia and the port city of Caffa. •1221 AD - 2 of G. Khan’s generals led a campaign to N. India in pursuit of the Sultan’s son and heir. •1235, the Mongols made Kashmir their vassal state. •1241 – Mongol forces attacked the Indus Valley, butchering the town of Lahore. •1240 AD – Under Batu Khan, the Russian city of Kiev was destroyed. •Mongols or the Golden Horde, ruled Russia for 200 years, from the new capital city of Moscow. •Mongols demanded 2 things: tribute and slavish obedience. •In 1227, Genghis Khan died. •To this day, Mongolians regard him as The Holy Warrior, a conquering king, and a man who will rise again to lead his people to new Sculpted statue work of Genghis victories. Khan •Genghis Khan, quite simply, conquered more than twice as much as any other man in history and redrew the boundaries of the world. In 1260 AD, the Mongol Empire was divided into 4 Khanates – all of which were ruled by a descendant of Genghis Khan. 1)The Khanate of the Great Khan (Mongolia and China) 2)The Khanate of Chaghadai (Central Asia). 3) The Ilkhanate – (Persia – Iran/Iraq) 4) The Khanate of the Golden Horde (Russia) •In 25 years, the Mongols conquered more lands and people than the Romans did in 400 years. •Combined with the victories of his sons and grandsons, they conquered the most heavily populated civilizations in the 13th century. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire*
    STRUGGLE FOR EAST-EUROPEAN EMPIRE: 1400-1700 The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire* HALİL İNALCIK The empire of the Golden Horde, built by Batu, son of Djodji and the grand son of Genghis Khan, around 1240, was an empire which united the whole East-Europe under its domination. The Golden Horde empire comprised ali of the remnants of the earlier nomadic peoples of Turkic language in the steppe area which were then known under the common name of Tatar within this new political framework. The Golden Horde ruled directly över the Eurasian steppe from Khwarezm to the Danube and över the Russian principalities in the forest zone indirectly as tribute-paying states. Already in the second half of the 13th century the western part of the steppe from the Don river to the Danube tended to become a separate political entity under the powerful emir Noghay. In the second half of the 14th century rival branches of the Djodjid dynasty, each supported by a group of the dissident clans, started a long struggle for the Ulugh-Yurd, the core of the empire in the lower itil (Volga) river, and for the title of Ulugh Khan which meant the supreme ruler of the empire. Toktamish Khan restored, for a short period, the unity of the empire. When defeated by Tamerlane, his sons and dependent clans resumed the struggle for the Ulugh-Khan-ship in the westem steppe area. During ali this period, the Crimean peninsula, separated from the steppe by a narrow isthmus, became a refuge area for the defeated in the steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • Gengis Kan Y La Formación Del Imperio Mongol Por Arturo Galindo García
    GenGis Kan y la formación del imperio monGol por Arturo Galindo García fuentes primarias: Ramírez Medellín, L. (2011): Historia secreta de los mongoles , Miraguano Ediciones. Raymond Beazley, C. (1903) The Texts and Versions of John De Plano Carpini and William De Rubruquis, As Printed for the First Time by Hakluyt in 1598 , Together with Some Shorter Pieces Raymond Beazley, C & Hakluyt Society. obras de consulta: De Nicola, B. (2006-7): Las mujeres mongolas en los siglos XII y XIII un análisis sobre el rol de de la madre y la esposa de Chinggis Khan , en Acta Historica et Archaeologica Mediaevalia, Universidad de Barcelona. Turnbull, S. (2003): The mongol Warrior: 1200 – 1350 , Osprey Publishing. Weatherford, J. (2006): Genghis Khan y el inicio del mundo moderno , Ediciones Crítica. Palazuelos, E. (2001): El poder sin metáfora: el imperio de Genghis Khan , Siglo XXI de España Editores. Aigle, D. (2004): Loi mongole vs loi islamique. Entre mythe et réalité , en Annales Histoire Sciences sociales , Éditions de l’École des hautes etudes en sciences sociales. la conquista y destrucción del imperio jorasmio por Borja Pelegero fuentes primarias: Juvaini, A., Genghis Khan. The history of the world conqueror. Boyle, J., A., (Trad.) Manchester University Press. Manchester, (1958) 1997. Ramírez, L., (Trad.). Historia secreta de los mongoles . Miraguano Ediciones. Madrid, 2000. Rashid al-Din, Histoire des Mongols de la Perse. Quatrèmere, M., A., Oriental Press. Amsterdam, 1968. fuentes secundarias: Akhinzanov, S., M., «Kipcaks and Khwarazm» en Seaman, G.; Marks, D., Rulers from the steppe. State formation on the Eurasian periphery. Ethno - graphics Press. Los Angleles, 1991. Barfield, T ., The perilous frontier: nomadic empires and China .
    [Show full text]
  • Koshymova Aknur the Role of Oghuzes in the VIII-XIII Centuries In
    Koshymova Aknur The role of Oghuzes in the VIII-XIII centuries in the formation of ethno genesis of Turkic peoples ANNOTATION To the dissertation prepared to get PhD degree in “History” – 6D020300 General description of the dissertation. The dissertation paper explores the place of Oghuz in the ethnogenesis of the Turkic peoples in the context of the history of the Kazakhs, Azerbaijanis, Turkmen, Kyrgyz, and Turks. The relevance of the research. The studied problem reflects one of the topical issues that has a peculiar place both in national history and foreign historiography. Due to the antiquity and deep historical roots of the ethnogenetic process of the formation of the late Turkic peoples, the researchers recognized the direct involvement of the Oghuz clans and tribes in the history of the Kazakhs. During the study of the ethnogenesis of a single Turkic people, the process of its formation, development paths and features, you can see how great the role of migration and assimilation processes in the content of ethnic mixing of the autochthonous population and alien tribes, which determined the future ethnic composition, language, culture, and this circumstance allows us to consider this factor as the leading one. Therefore, the history of the Oghuz-speaking peoples who inhabited Central and Asia Minor, the Caucasus, from a modern point of view, must be investigated in close connection with the history of the Kazakh people, which makes it possible to obtain valuable scientific results. The history of the Oghuz originating in the VIII century from the territories of the Mongolian plateau and the northeastern part of modern Kazakhstan, which as a result of mass movements occupied the Syrdarya valley, then the territory of modern Turkmenistan, then Azerbaijan and Anatolia, which led to dramatic changes in ethnic processes in these regions, it is necessary to consider taking into account the historical and genetic continuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Turkic Nations and Their Image on Nature and Human Being (VI-IX Centuries)
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 8; 2015 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Medieval Turkic Nations and Their Image on Nature and Human Being (VI-IX Centuries) Galiya Iskakova1, Talas Omarbekov1 & Ahmet Tashagil2 1 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Faculty of History, Archeology and Ethnology, Kazakhstan 2 Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Faculty of Science, Turkey Correspondence: Galiya Iskakova, al-Farabi Avenue, 71, Almaty, 050038, Kazakhstan. Received: November 27, 2014 Accepted: December 10, 2014 Online Published: March 20, 2015 doi:10.5539/ass.v11n8p155 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n8p155 Abstract The article aims to consider world vision of medieval (VI-IX centuries) Turkic tribes on nature and human being and the issues, which impact on the emergence of their world image on nature, human being as well as their perceptions in this case. In this regard, the paper analyzes the concepts on territory, borders and bound in the Turks` society, the indicator of the boundaries for Turkic tribes and the way of expression the world concept on nature and human being of above stated nations. The research findings show that Turks as their descendants Kazakhs had a distinctive vision on environment and the relationship between human being and nature. Human being and nature were conceived as a single organism. Relationship of Turkic mythic outlook with real historical tradition and a particular geographical location captures the scale of the era of the birth of new cultural schemes. It was reflected in the various historical monuments, which characterizes the Turkic civilization as a complex system.
    [Show full text]
  • Protagonist of Qubilai Khan's Unsuccessful
    BUQA CHĪNGSĀNG: PROTAGONIST OF QUBILAI KHAN’S UNSUCCESSFUL COUP ATTEMPT AGAINST THE HÜLEGÜID DYNASTY MUSTAFA UYAR* It is generally accepted that the dissolution of the Mongol Empire began in 1259, following the death of Möngke the Great Khan (1251–59)1. Fierce conflicts were to arise between the khan candidates for the empty throne of the Great Khanate. Qubilai (1260–94), the brother of Möngke in China, was declared Great Khan on 5 May 1260 in the emergency qurultai assembled in K’ai-p’ing, which is quite far from Qara-Qorum, the principal capital of Mongolia2. This event started the conflicts within the Mongolian Khanate. The first person to object to the election of the Great Khan was his younger brother Ariq Böke (1259–64), another son of Qubilai’s mother Sorqoqtani Beki. Being Möngke’s brother, just as Qubilai was, he saw himself as the real owner of the Great Khanate, since he was the ruler of Qara-Qorum, the main capital of the Mongol Khanate. Shortly after Qubilai was declared Khan, Ariq Böke was also declared Great Khan in June of the same year3. Now something unprecedented happened: there were two competing Great Khans present in the Mongol Empire, and both received support from different parts of the family of the empire. The four Mongol khanates, which should theo- retically have owed obedience to the Great Khan, began to act completely in their own interests: the Khan of the Golden Horde, Barka (1257–66) supported Böke. * Assoc. Prof., Ankara University, Faculty of Languages, History and Geography, Department of History, Ankara/TURKEY, [email protected] 1 For further information on the dissolution of the Mongol Empire, see D.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi POWER, POLITICS, AND TRADITION IN THE MONGOL EMPIRE AND THE ĪlkhānaTE OF IRAN OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Īlkhānate of Iran MICHAEL HOPE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6D P, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Michael Hope 2016 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2016 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2016932271 ISBN 978–0–19–876859–3 Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Mongol Invasions
    CK_4_TH_HG_P087_242.QXD 10/6/05 9:02 AM Page 162 V. China: Dynasties and Conquerors navigators could use it to be sure they were traveling in the right direction. The compass did not reach Europe until the 1200s. It was one of the navigational devices that enabled Europeans to embark on their voyages of exploration in search of an all-water route to Asia. Paper money came into use in China during the Song dynasty. The Chinese, Teaching Idea as well as other peoples, had been using metal coins for centuries, but the Chinese Ask students to write an expository were the first to use paper currency. Two other inventions converged to make the piece about why they think the Chinese use of paper currency possible. First, the Chinese had invented the process of invented paper money instead of con- making paper in 105 CE, and then, during the Tang dynasty in the 700s CE, they tinuing solely to use coins. Historians had learned how to print from large blocks of type—the words for a page were believe the Chinese switched to paper carved into a single block of wood the size of the page, then inked, and paper money because there was not enough applied. In the 1040s, the Chinese had invented the use of movable type for print- copper, bronze, and iron to make coins ing. The characters for individual words were carved into small pieces of wood and for the entire population. Also, paper assembled to make a page, then inked, and paper applied. Europeans would not money was easier to carry around and employ movable type until the time of Gutenberg, about 1450.
    [Show full text]
  • Il-Khanate Empire
    1 Il-Khanate Empire 1250s, after the new Great Khan, Möngke (r.1251–1259), sent his brother Hülegü to MICHAL BIRAN expand Mongol territories into western Asia, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel primarily against the Assassins, an extreme Isma‘ilite-Shi‘ite sect specializing in political The Il-Khanate was a Mongol state that ruled murder, and the Abbasid Caliphate. Hülegü in Western Asia c.1256–1335. It was known left Mongolia in 1253. In 1256, he defeated to the Mongols as ulus Hülegü, the people the Assassins at Alamut, next to the Caspian or state of Hülegü (1218–1265), the dynasty’s Sea, adding to his retinue Nasir al-Din al- founder and grandson of Chinggis Khan Tusi, one of the greatest polymaths of the (Genghis Khan). Centered in Iran and Muslim world, who became his astrologer Azerbaijan but ruling also over Iraq, Turkme- and trusted advisor. In 1258, with the help nistan, and parts of Afghanistan, Anatolia, of various Mongol tributaries, including and the southern Caucasus (Georgia, many Muslims, he brutally conquered Bagh- Armenia), the Il-Khanate was a highly cos- dad, eliminating the Abbasid Caliphate that mopolitan empire that had close connections had nominally led the Muslim world for more with China and Western Europe. It also had a than 500 years (750–1258). Hülegü continued composite administration and legacy that into Syria, but withdrew most of his troops combined Mongol, Iranian, and Muslim after hearing of Möngke’s death (1259). The elements, and produced some outstanding defeat of the remnants of his troops by the cultural achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Empires of Asia the Great Empires of Asia
    The Great Empires of Asia The Great Empires of Asia EDITED BY JIM MASSELOS FOREWORD BY JONATHAN FENBY WITH 27 ILLUSTRATIONS Note on spellings and transliterations There is no single agreed system for transliterating into the Western CONTENTS alphabet names, titles and terms from the different cultures and languages represented in this book. Each culture has separate traditions FOREWORD 8 for the most ‘correct’ way in which words should be transliterated from The Legacy of Empire Arabic and other scripts. However, to avoid any potential confusion JONATHAN FENBY to the non-specialist reader, in this volume we have adopted a single system of spellings and have generally used the versions of names and titles that will be most familiar to Western readers. INTRODUCTION 14 The Distinctiveness of Asian Empires JIM MASSELOS Elements of Empire Emperors and Empires Maintaining Empire Advancing Empire CHAPTER ONE 27 Central Asia: The Mongols 1206–1405 On the cover: Map of Unidentified Islands off the Southern Anatolian Coast, by Ottoman admiral and geographer Piri Reis (1465–1555). TIMOTHY MAY Photo: The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore. The Rise of Chinggis Khan The Empire after Chinggis Khan First published in the United Kingdom in 2010 by Thames & Hudson Ltd, 181A High Holborn, London WC1V 7QX The Army of the Empire Civil Government This compact paperback edition first published in 2018 The Rule of Law The Great Empires of Asia © 2010 and 2018 Decline and Dissolution Thames & Hudson Ltd, London The Greatness of the Mongol Empire Foreword © 2018 Jonathan Fenby All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced CHAPTER TWO 53 or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, China: The Ming 1368–1644 including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Myths Behind the Mongol Invasion of Moravia in 1241*
    238 ЗОЛОТООРДЫНСКОЕ ОБОЗРЕНИЕ / GOLDEN HORDE REVIEW. 2018, 6 (2) УДК 930+94"1241/1223"(436/439+517.9) DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2018-6-2.238-251 FORGING THE PAST: FACTS AND MYTHS BEHIND THE MONGOL INVASION OF MORAVIA IN 1241* Tomáš Somer Palacký University Olomouc Olomouc, Czech Republic [email protected] Abstract: Research objectives: There are two research objectives to this study. The first is to survey the events of the Mongol invasion of Moravia in the spring of 1241 and the second is to examine how the story changed over the following centuries. The narrative surrounding the Mongol invasion lost its grounding in fact, and different versions of the story quickly arose. In this paper, I will explain when, why and how the story evolved. The Research materials are therefore diverse. The first part of the article is based upon 13th-century sources (charters, epistles, chronicles) of Central European origin. In the se- cond part, later medieval chronicles as well as early modern historical treatises will be studied. These works influenced the perception (and form) of the story both at home and abroad since many of them were accessible in different languages. The Results and novelty of the research are therefore twofold. Since the Mongol myth became the subject of 19th-century forgeries, many scholars were misled by them. As a result, the forged documents have been presented as trustworthy sources even by renowned contemporary scholars. Consequently, the description of the historical events of 1241 un- dergo dramatic changes. The invasion – presented at times as a catastrophe – was in reality merely the brief passage of Mongol troops through Moravian territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Reasons for Mongol Success Under Genghis Khan Many Factors Facilitated the Mongols’ Remarkable Military Success
    Reasons for Mongol Success Under Genghis Khan Many factors facilitated the Mongols’ remarkable military success. Fighting skills. The Mongols’ skilled horsemanship gave them an immense advantage in mobility, enabling them to strike without warning, capitalize on enemy mistakes, and quickly change direction in the midst of battle. With their powerful bows and superb marksmanship they could shoot with deadly precision from several hundred yards away, decimating an opposing force before it could fight back, or fire flaming arrows over the walls of a surrounded city. With their courage and endurance they could swiftly cover great distances, maintain composure in combat, and almost always outfight and outlast their foes. Unity and discipline. Insisting that his generals renounce tribal ties and demanding total loyalty to himself, Genghis Khan centralized his command and instilled iron discipline in his troops. As a result, even when his forces grew to 200,000 and included thousands of Turks and other non-Mongols, they were still able to fight as one and closely coordinate their actions in the course of combat. Lack of united resistance. Animosities among his enemies, and the previous breakup of China and Persia through invasions by other nomads, enabled Genghis Khan to attack and destroy his targets one at a time. He was also occasionally aided by his enemies’ foes: in northern China, for example, Chinese and Khitan residents who resented Jurchen rule helped the Mongols to end it. Reconnaissance. Rarely did the Mongols attack until they had thoroughly scouted their adversaries. From spies, traveling merchants, and tortured captives, Mongol leaders learned about the composition of enemy forces, the layout of cities, and the design of defenses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monetary System of the Golden Horde *
    GERMAN A. FEDOROV-DAVYDOV The Monetary System of The Golden Horde * ‘The Monetary System of The Golden Horde’ was the last book of a prominent Russian historian, the Late G. A. Fedorov-Davydov (1931–2000). The author of many books and articles, G. A. Fedorov-Davydov was a recognised expert in Russian and Tatar numismatics, archaeology and history. The Golden Horde and its monetary system was the focus of his scientific interests and, in many respects, this book sums up the author’s views on the history of the Horde coinage which was closely connected with the political and economic history of the region. The Golden Horde coinage was quite developed, silver and copper coins having been struck in great numbers. The coins were minted on flattened pieces of metal by special coin stamps. Flattened blanks prepared for minting are occasionally found in hoards and cultural layers of the Golden Horde settlements. Weight units, miskal and dannik, are important for the establishing of standard weights of the Golden Horde coins. Dannik weighed 0.78 grams. An anonymous 14th century report on the Khorezm monetary system along with the actual weights of Khorezm coins enables us to establish that 6 danniks were equal to 1 miskal with a weight of 4.68 grams. Weights of ten and hundred miskals have been found in a number of the Golden Horde towns. The first coins of the Golden Horde were struck in 1240–1250 in the town of Bolgar. These coins feature the name of the Late Baghdad Caliph Nasir Lid Din and, later, names of the Mongol rulers — Great Khan Mongke (1251–1259) and Arig-Buga (1259–1264).
    [Show full text]