DOCSLIB.ORG

Gengis Kan Y La Formación Del Imperio Mongol Por Arturo Galindo García

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gengis Kan Y La Formación Del Imperio Mongol Por Arturo Galindo García GenGis Kan y la formación del imperio monGol por Arturo Galindo García fuentes primarias: Ramírez Medellín, L. (2011): Historia secreta de los mongoles , Miraguano Ediciones. Raymond Beazley, C. (1903) The Texts and Versions of John De Plano Carpini and William De Rubruquis, As Printed for the First Time by Hakluyt in 1598 , Together with Some Shorter Pieces Raymond Beazley, C & Hakluyt Society. obras de consulta: De Nicola, B. (2006-7): Las mujeres mongolas en los siglos XII y XIII un análisis sobre el rol de de la madre y la esposa de Chinggis Khan , en Acta Historica et Archaeologica Mediaevalia, Universidad de Barcelona. Turnbull, S. (2003): The mongol Warrior: 1200 – 1350 , Osprey Publishing. Weatherford, J. (2006): Genghis Khan y el inicio del mundo moderno , Ediciones Crítica. Palazuelos, E. (2001): El poder sin metáfora: el imperio de Genghis Khan , Siglo XXI de España Editores. Aigle, D. (2004): Loi mongole vs loi islamique. Entre mythe et réalité , en Annales Histoire Sciences sociales , Éditions de l’École des hautes etudes en sciences sociales. la conquista y destrucción del imperio jorasmio por Borja Pelegero fuentes primarias: Juvaini, A., Genghis Khan. The history of the world conqueror. Boyle, J., A., (Trad.) Manchester University Press. Manchester, (1958) 1997. Ramírez, L., (Trad.). Historia secreta de los mongoles . Miraguano Ediciones. Madrid, 2000. Rashid al-Din, Histoire des Mongols de la Perse. Quatrèmere, M., A., Oriental Press. Amsterdam, 1968. fuentes secundarias: Akhinzanov, S., M., «Kipcaks and Khwarazm» en Seaman, G.; Marks, D., Rulers from the steppe. State formation on the Eurasian periphery. Ethno - graphics Press. Los Angleles, 1991. Barfield, T ., The perilous frontier: nomadic empires and China . Basil Blackwell. Oxford, 1989. Barthold, W., Turkestan down to the mongol invasion . Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, (1900) 2007. Biran, M., The empire of the Qara Khitai in Eurasian history . Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, (2005) 2008. Boyle, J., «Dynastic and political history of the Ilkhans», en Boyle, J., (Ed.) The Cambridge history of Iran, vol. 5. The Saljuq and Mongol periods. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1968. De Hartog, L., Genghis Khan: Conqueror of the World . Tauris Parke Paperbacks. London, (1989) 2003. Golden, P., «War and warfare in the pre-cinggisid western steppes of Eurasia», en Di Cosmo, N., 2002. en Di Cosmo, N., (Ed.) Warfare in inner asian history (500-1800). Brill. Leiden, 2002. Hildinger, E ., Warriors of the steppe. Da Capo Press. Cambridge, 1997. Karasaulas, A., Mounted archers of the steppe 600 BCAD 1300 . Osprey Publishing. Oxford, 2004. Khazanov, A., Nomads and the outside world , The University of Wisconsin Press. Madison, (1984) 1994. Kwanten, L ., Imperial nomads. A history of central Asia 500-1500. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia, 1979. May, T., The mongol art of war . Pen & Sword. Barns Ley, 2007. Morgan, D., Los mongoles . Alianza Editorial. Madrid, (1986) 1990. Nomguunsüren, G.; Ahrens, B.; Piezonka, H., «Das Höhlengrab von Cagaan Chad, Bogd sum, Övörchangaj ajmag» en Bemmann, J., Steppenkrieger. Reiternomaden des 7.-14. jahrhunderts aus der Mongolei. Primus Verlag. Bon, 2012 Pelegero, B., Breve historia de Gengis Kan. Ediciones Nowtilus. Madrid, 2010. Ratchnevsky, P., Genghis Khan. His life and legacy . Blackwell Publishing. Oxford, (1984) 1993. Roux, J.P., Histoire de l’empire mongol . Fayard. Paris, 1993. Saunders, J., La conquista mongólica. Eudebam. Buenos Aires, (1971) 1973. Sinor, D., «The inner asian warriors», en Sinor, D., Studies in medieval inner Asia . Variorum. Aldershot, 1997. Turnbull, S., Mongol Warrior 1200-1350 . Osprey Publishing. Oxford, 2003. Weatherford, J., Genghis Khan y el inicio del mundo moderno . Crítica. Barcelona, (2004) 2006. - - la batalla de ayn jalut: mamelucos contra monGoles por Mustafa Uyar, Ankara Üniversitesi Amitai-Preiss, R. (1995): Mongols and Mamluks: the Mamluk-ĪlkhĪnid War, 1260-1281 , Cambridge. Ayalon, D. (1953): “Studies on the Structure of the Mamluk Army –II”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , University of London, XV, 3, pp. 448-476. Mason Smith Jr., J. (1984): “Ayn JĪlĪt: MamlĪk Success or Mongol Failure?”, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies , XLIV, 2, pp. 307-345. May , T. (2007): The Mongol Art of War , South Yorkshire. Nickel, H. (1979): “A MamlĪk Axe” en Elgood, R. (Ed.) Islamic Arms and Armour , London 1979, p. 161 Nicolle, D. (1993): The MemlĪks 1250-1517 , Osprey, London. Rabie, H. (1975): “The Training of the MamlĪk FĪris”, en Parry, V. J. y Yapp, M. E. (Eds.) War, Technology and Society in the Middle East , London, p. 153-163. la batalla lieGnitz por Ilkka Syvanne Chambers J. (1971/2001), The Devil’s Horsemen. The Mongol Invasion of Europe. Christiansen E. (1980/1997), The Northern Crusades. Davies N. (2005), God’s Playground. A History of Poland. Desperta Ferro 9. Fennell J. (1983/88), The Crisis of Medieval Russia 1200-1304. France J. (1999), Western Warfare in the Age of the Crusades 1000-1300. Gabriel R.A. (2004), Genghis Khan’s greatest general: Subotai the valiant. Hartog L. de (1989/2006), Genghis Khan. Horn P. Dr. (1894), Das Heer- und Kriegswesen der Grossmoghuls. Jackson P. (2005), The Mongols and the West. Martin D. (1943), ‘The Mongol Army’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , 46-85. Martinez A.P. (1986), ‘Some Notes on the Il-Xanid Army’, Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 6 , 129- 242. May T. (2007), The Mongol Art of War. Medieval Warfare Vol. 2.2. Nicolle D. (1990), The Mongol Warlords. —(1996/2005), Lake Peipus 1242. —(2007), Teutonic Knight 1190-1561 ; —(2008), Medieval Polish Armies 966-1500 . Nicolle D. & Shpakovsky V. (2001), Kalka River 1223. Onon U., The Art of War under Chinggis Qahan (Genghis Khan), web: deremilitari.org. Richard. J. (1979), ‘Les causes des victories mongoles d’apres les historiens occidentaux du xiiie siecle’, in Central Asiatic Journal 23 , 104-117. The Rule of the Templars, (1992) tr. J.M. Upton-Ward with M. Bennett’s reprinted article ‘ Le Règle du Temple as a Military Manual, or How to Deli - ver a Cavalry Charge’. Sarkar J.N. (1984), The Art of War in Medieval India. Seward D. (1972/1995), The Monks of War. Smith J. M. Jr. (1984), ‘Ayn Jalut: Mamluk Success or Mongol Failure?’, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 44 , 307-45. Syvänne I. (2004), The Age of Hippotoxotai . Turnbull S. (2003), Genghis Khan & the Mongol Conquests 1190-1400. —(2003), Mongol Warrior 1200-1350. —(2003), Tannenberg 1410. Urban W. (2003), The Teutonic Knights. A Military History. Web: article The Battle of Liegnitz (Legnica), 1241 by TJK in allempires.com . la dinastía yuan (1279-1368) por Iñigo Bolinaga Boyle, John Andrew. The Mongol World Empire (1206-1370). Londres: Variorum Reprints, 1977. Budge, E.A. The Monks of Kublai Khan or the History od the Life and Travels of Rabban Sauma and Marqos . Londres: Religious Tract Society, 1928. Chan, Hok-Lam. China and the Mongols: history and legend under the Yüann and Ming . Hampshire: Ashgate, 1999. Chan, Hok-Lam. China under mongol rule . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981. Chen, Yuan. Western and central Asians in China under the Mongols: their transformation into Chinese . Nettetal: Steyler, 1999. Dardess, John W. Conquerors and Confucians: aspects of political change in late Yüan China. New York: Columbia University Press, 1973. Endicott-West, Elizabeth. Mongolian rule in China: local administration in the Yüan Dynasty . Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989. Farquhar, Davis M. The Government of China under Mongolian rule: a reference guide. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1990. Franke, Herbert. China under Mongol rule. Hampshire: Variorum Reprints, 1994. Morgan, David. Los mongoles . Madrid: Alianza, 1990. Schurmann, H.F. Economic Structures of the Yuan Dinasty . Cambridge (Massachussets, EEUU): Universidad de Harvard, 1956. Vladimirstov, B. Le Régime social des Mongols . París: Maisonneuve, 1948. (En francés). Balazs, Etienne. Civilización china y burocracia . Buenos Aires: Sur, 1966. Cahill, James. Hills beyond a River . New York: Weatherhill, 1976. Gil, Juan. En demanda del Gran Khan: viajes a Mongolia en el siglo XIII . Madrid: Alianza, 1993. Rossabi, Morris. Khubilai Khan: His Life and Times . Berkeley (CA, EEUU): Universidad de California, 1988. Spence, Jonathan. El gran continente del Khan . Madrid: Aguilar, 1999. revistas The Bulletin of Song Yuan Studies . Cornell: Departamento de Historia, Universidad de Cornell (NY, EEUU). The Journal of Song Yuan Studies . Middlebury: Departamento de Historia, Middlebury College (VT, EEUU). 1212 las navas de tolosa por Francisco García Fitz, Universidad de Extremadura Alvira Cabrera, M. (2000): Guerra e ideología en la España Medieval: cultura y actitudes históricas ante el giro de principios del siglo XIII. Batallas de Las Navas de Tolosa (1212) y Muret (1213) , Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid. García Fitz, F. (2005): Las Navas de Tolosa , Barcelona. Huici Miranda, A. (2000): Las grandes batallas de la Reconquista durante las invasiones africanas (Almorávides, Almohades y Benimerines) , Ma - drid, 1956. [Ed. Facsímil con estudio preliminar de E. Molina López y C. Navarro Oltra, Granada]. López Payer, M. G. y Rosado Llamas, Mª D. (2002): La batalla de Las Navas de Tolosa , Madrid. Rosado Llamas, Mª D.y López Payer, M. G. (2001): La batalla de las Navas de Tolosa. Historia y Mito , Jaén. Vara Thorbeck, C. (1999): El Lunes de Las Navas , Jaén..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi POWER, POLITICS, AND TRADITION IN THE MONGOL EMPIRE AND THE ĪlkhānaTE OF IRAN OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Īlkhānate of Iran MICHAEL HOPE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6D P, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Michael Hope 2016 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2016 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2016932271 ISBN 978–0–19–876859–3 Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mongol and Ming Empire
    Zhu Yuanzhang a peasant leader, created a rebel army that defeated the Mongols and pushed them back beyond the Great Wall It could be cruel if you were not a Mongol. Mongols had more privileges than Chinese people. The Mongols held more government jobs. And If you were Chinese you had to pay a tribute to the Mongols at the end of each month They restored the civil service system They were able to delegate responsibility to lower levels of government to reduce corruption They improved new ways for farming and restored the canal to improve trading What advantage would riding on horseback have during warfare? Section 2 Unit 12 The Mongols were nomadic people who grazed their horses and sheep in Central Asia In the early 1200’s, a brilliant Mongol chieftain united tribes. This chieftain took the name Genghis Khan meaning “universal ruler” Mongol forces conquered a vast empire that stretched from the Pacific Ocean to Eastern Europe Genghis Khan demanded absolute loyalty His army had the most skilled horsemen in the world He could order the massacre of an entire city The Mongols and the Chinese would often attack each other by launching missiles against each other from metal tubes filled with gunpowder Although Genghis Khan did not live to complete his conquest of China his heirs continued to expand the empire. The Mongols dominated much of Asia The Mongols allowed people they conquered to live peaceful lives as long as they paid tribute to the Mongols In the 1200’s and 1300’s the sons and grandsons of Genghis Khan established peace and order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Horde State in the System of International Relations
    136 GOLDEN HORDE REVIEW. № 1. 2015 УДК 94(470) THE GOLDEN HORDE STATE IN THE SYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS I.М. Mirgaleev (Sh. Marjani Institute of History, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan) The present article examines the place of the Golden Horde in the system of international relations of the 13th–14th centuries as well as directions of its foreign policy. To determine the place of the ulus of Jochi in the international system the author suggests to disclose the subject through illumination of such important issues as: – the Mongol conquests and creation of the Chingisid state entities, the establishment of a new international order. – formation of the ulus of Jochi as an independent State and its role in the Chingisid States’ relations, the kurultai of 1269. – international activities of the Golden Horde State during the period of its might. – interstate coalitions in the global geopolitics and national interests of the ulus of Jochi in international systems. – The role and place of the Golden Horde in the international life of the second half of the 14th – early 15th centuries. The program activity of the Jochids in a new geopolitical situation of the late 14th – early 15th centuries. The author believes that the establishment of the Golden Horde State occurred in three phases (1207–1241, 1242–1259, 1260–1269). The Jochids’ policy towards their neighbors and other Chingisid states formed during this time. Both the Distemper of the 1360–70’s in the ulus of Jochi and destruction of all other Chingisid States resulted in the Golden Horde’s loss of its place in the system of international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Paleologina and the Il-Khanate of Persia. a Byzantine Princess in an Empire Between Islam and Christendom
    MARIA PALEOLOGINA AND THE IL-KHANATE OF PERSIA. A BYZANTINE PRINCESS IN AN EMPIRE BETWEEN ISLAM AND CHRISTENDOM MARÍA ISABEL CABRERA RAMOS UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA SpaIN Date of receipt: 26th of January, 2016 Final date of acceptance: 12th of July, 2016 ABSTRACT In the 13th century Persia, dominated by the Mongols, a Byzantine princess, Maria Paleologina, stood out greatly in the court of Abaqa Khan, her husband. The Il-Khanate of Persia was then an empire precariously balanced between Islam, dominant in its territories and Christianity that was prevailing in its court and in the diplomatic relations. The role of Maria, a fervent Christian, was decisive in her husband’s policy and in that of any of his successors. Her figure deserves a detailed study and that is what we propose in this paper. KEYWORDS Maria Paleologina, Il-khanate of Persia, Abaqa, Michel VIII, Mongols. CapitaLIA VERBA Maria Paleologa, Ilkhanatus Persiae, Abaqa, Michael VIII, Mongoles. IMAGO TEMPORIS. MEDIUM AEVUM, XI (2017): 217-231 / ISSN 1888-3931 / DOI 10.21001/itma.2017.11.08 217 218 MARÍA ISABEL CABRERA RAMOS 1. Introduction The great expansion of Genghis Khan’s hordes to the west swept away the Islamic states and encouraged for a while the hopes of the Christian states of the East. The latter tried to ally themselves with the powerful Mongols and in this attempt they played the religion card.1 Although most of the Mongols who entered Persia, Iraq and Syria were shamanists, Nestorian Christianity exerted a strong influence among elites, especially in the court. That was why during some crucial decades for the history of the East, the Il-Khanate of Persia fluctuated between the consolidation of Christian influence and the approach to Islam, that despite the devastation brought by the Mongols in Persia,2 Iraq and Syria remained the dominant factor within the Il-khanate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of Medical Knowledge and the Neurosciences During the Time of Genghis Khan and the Mongolian Empire
    Neurosurg Focus 23 (1):E13, 2007 The fate of medical knowledge and the neurosciences during the time of Genghis Khan and the Mongolian Empire SAM SAFAVI-ABBASI, M.D., PH.D.,1 LEONARDO B. C. BRASILIENSE, M.D.,2 RYAN K. WORKMAN, B.S.,2 MELANIE C. TALLEY, PH.D.,2 IMAN FEIZ-ERFAN, M.D.,1 NICHOLAS THEODORE, M.D.,1 ROBERT F. SPETZLER, M.D.,1 AND MARK C. PREUL, M.D.1 1Division of Neurological Surgery, Neurosurgery Research; and 2Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona PIn 25 years, the Mongolian army of Genghis Khan conquered more of the known world than the Roman Empire accomplished in 400 years of conquest. The recent revised view is that Genghis Khan and his descendants brought about “pax Mongolica” by securing trade routes across Eurasia. After the initial shock of destruction by an unknown barbaric tribe, almost every country conquered by the Mongols was transformed by a rise in cultural communication, expanded trade, and advances in civiliza- tion. Medicine, including techniques related to surgery and neurological surgery, became one of the many areas of life and culture that the Mongolian Empire influenced. (DOI: 10.3171/FOC-07/07/E13) KEY WORDS • Avicenna • Genghis Khan • history of neuroscience • Mongolian empire • Persia EPORTS ABOUT THE HISTORY of medicine in Asia are golica” and secured the fabled trade routes between scarce. This article provides an overview of the fate Europe and eastern China known as the Silk Road.8,23 R of Asian medicine, specifically Persian, Indian, and After the initial shock and destruction associated with Chinese scientific, neurological, and surgical knowledge invasion by an unknown barbaric tribe, almost every before and during the Mongolian invasion and hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • Khanate of the Golden Horde (Kipchak)
    The Mongol Catastrophe For the Muslim east, the sudden eruption of the Mongol hordes was an indescribable calamity. Something of the shock and despair of Muslim reaction can be seen in the history of the contemporary historian Ibn al-Athir (d. 1233). He writes here about the year 1220-1221 when the Mongols (“Tartars”) burst in on the eastern lands. Is this a positive, negative, or neutral description of the Mongols? Why might the Mongols be compared to Alexander rather than, say, the Huns? they eat, [needing] naught else. As for their beasts which they ride, these dig into I say, therefore, that this thing involves the description of the greatest catastrophe the earth with their hoofs and eat the roots of plants, knowing naught of barley. and the most dire calamity (of the like of which days and nights are innocent) And so, when they alight anywhere, they have need of nothing from without. As for which befell all men generally, and the Muslims in particular; so that, should 0e say their religion, the‟ worship the sun when it arises, and regard nothing as unlawful, that the world, since God Almighty created Adam until now, hath not been afflicted for the; eat all beasts, even dogs, pigs, and the like; nor do they recognise the with the like thereof, he would but speak the truth. For indeed history doth not marriage-tie, for several men are in marital relations with one woman, and if a child contain aught which approaches or comes nigh unto it.... is born, it knows not who is its father.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silk Road in the Mongol Era
    THE SILK ROAD IN THE MONGOL ERA THE SILK ROAD IN THE MONGOL ERA W.J. de Graaf Tilburg University Supervisor: Dr. T.G. Leesen Second reader: Dr. K. Pansters June 2018 THE SILK ROAD IN THE MONGOL ERA 2 Abstract This research aims to explain the causes for the success and decline of trade along the Silk Road in the Mongol Empire by examining to what extent religious freedom and political stability played a role. The success of silver as an intercontinental currency demonstrates that, in the time of the Pax Mongolica, intercontinental trade alongside the Silk Road flourished. This thesis examines to what extent the Mongol Empire promoted religious freedom and provided a stable political climate and to what extent that open climate facilitated the intercontinental trade along the Silk Road. The findings regarding religious freedom and political stability urge Central Asia to take note of this research as they are joining China’s new Silk Road Initiative. Keywords: Religious Freedom, Political Stability, Economy, Silk Road, Central Asia, Pax Mongolica, Yassa (law) THE SILK ROAD IN THE MONGOL ERA 3 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4 Contextualization of the Research .................................................................................. 4 A. What is the Silk Road? .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China: Yuan Dynasty (AD 1279-1368)
    China: Yuan dynasty (AD 1279-1368) The emperors of the Yuan dynasty were Mongols, descendants of Ghenghis Khan (1162-1227), the 'Universal Leader' as his name translates. Ghenghis had conquered part of northern China in 1215, having already united the various nomadic tribes of the steppe land. He divided his empire into four kingdoms, each ruled and expanded by a son and his wife. Ghenghis' grandson, Kublai Khan (reigned 1260-94), was ruler of the eastern Great Khanate. He completed the conquest of China by defeating the Southern Song in 1279. He ruled as emperor, giving his dynasty a Chinese name, Yuan, meaning 'origin'. He moved the capital to Dadu (now Beijing), shifting the central focus of the empire away from Central Asia. Under the Mongols, the élite was formed by military officers, rather than the scholar- officials of previous dynasties. Though the bureaucracy was still necessary for administering the country, many scholar-officials retired, rather than serve a foreign regime. These yi-min, or 'leftover ones', dedicated themselves to painting and other literary pursuits. Generally, the Mongol emperors and bureaucrats were not great patrons of the traditional Chinese arts, although there are a few exceptions. Craftsmen were free to develop and exploit new influences, many dictated by the demands of trade. This is especially apparent in ceramics production, the most important example of which is blue-and-white porcelain. Because it was foreign-ruled, the Yuan dynasty was traditionally considered to have been all detrimental, contributing nothing new or good to Chinese culture. In the past few decades, this thinking has undergone a change, resulting in a more objective appreciation of the Mongol period.
    [Show full text]
  • SG#38 the Mongol Empire
    Name_____________________________ Global Studies IR SG#38 The Mongol Empire Genghis Khan. The Mongols had lived in Central Asia as a nomadic people, moving with the seasons to find pastures for their herds of livestock. They became great horsemen and expert fighters as they competed for scarce grazing land. Under their new leader, Genghis Khan, this pattern of living changed. Genghis Khan, or the “Universal Ruler,” took power in 1206, bringing together the Mongol people. He granted land and the people that worked on it to his generals, in return for their military cooperation. By combining his army’s military superiority with this new feudal system, Genghis Khan prepared to conquer most of Asia. The new leader called a gathering of the leaders of all the nomadic tribes, called a quriltai, where he laid down the laws, or yasa, calling for strict discipline. The Rise of the Mongol Empire. Once he had united the Mongols, Genghis Khan moved to expand his empire. He first conquered the Tangut state in northwestern China, and then launched a campaign against the Jin dynasty. This campaign would end 23 years later with the total conquest of the Jin Empire. Meanwhile, by 1222, Mongol armies had conquered Turkistan and Afghanistan and had crossed into northern India, Persia, and Russia. Although Genghis Khan died in 1227, the expansion of the empire continued. His son, Ogodei, transformed the Mongol Empire from a military government to a centralized bureaucratic state, but also conquered other lands. Ogodei continued the invasion of China and conquered most of Persia. The Mongol armies also invaded Russia, Poland, and Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • India & Mongolia in the Middle Ages – More Than Just a Connection
    Ancient History of Asian Countries India & Mongolia in the Middle Ages – More Than Just a Connection By Mohan Gopal Author Mohan Gopal The Taj Mahal area and traced his lineage to a line of Turkic-Mongol warlords who alternately plagued, plundered, ruled and governed in greater or If there is one monument which conjures up an image of India, it lesser components a vast region which roughly spans the areas of is the Taj Mahal. It was constructed c. 1631 at the behest of Emperor present-day Turkey, southern Russia, the northern Middle East, Shah Jahan as the ultimate memorial and place of eternal rest for his central Asia, northern Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and northern India. beloved wife, Mumtaj. The Taj, as it is commonly referred to, is for The most commonly known name in this lineage was Tamerlane, romanticists across the globe, the ultimate architectural poem of love born in 1336 in central Asia, also known as Timur the Lame, Timur etched in white marble with floral motifs inlaid with precious stones; the Great or Timur the Horrible, depending on which perspective one a monument of perfect geometrical balance and symmetry. In this took – that of his huge territorial conquests or the countless and mausoleum lie the tombs of Emperor Shah Jahan and his beloved endless massacres and lootings which formed the basis of them. queen. Babur chose the former perspective and with pride considered It may come as a surprise to many that this widely admired, loved himself a Timurid, a descendant of the mighty Timur. and romanticized world artefact which has come to be known as a Babur’s mother was Qutlugh Nigar Khanum.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCO POLO Marco Polo, the First European to Travel to MARCO POLO China and Return to Write About His Adventures
    The Life and Times of and Times The Life The Life and Times of MARCO POLO Marco Polo, the first European to travel to MARCO POLO China and return to write about his adventures, was born in Venice in 1254. Marco’s father had MARCO POLO left on a journey to Asia before the boy was born. Marco did not see his father and uncle, Niccolò and Maffeo Polo, until fifteen years later. In 1271 the three Polos left Venice and headed for the court of Kublai Khan in eastern China. The journey took them more than three years—they arrived in 1275. Marco Polo became a favorite of the Great Kahn, and was sent on important missions all over the Mongol Empire. Marco and his father and uncle served Kublai Kahn for 17 years. When they returned to Venice in 1295, Marco became the captain of a merchant ship and was captured and imprisoned in Genoa. While in prison he and another prisoner who was a writer of romances wrote the story of Marco Polo’s adventures. Mitchell Lane PUBLISHERS ISBN 1-58415-264-8 90000 Mitchell Lane 9 PUBLISHERS 781584 152644 by Susan Zannos MitchellLane PUBLISHERS Copyright © 2005 by Mitchell Lane Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Printing 3456789 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zannos, Susan. The life and times of Marco Polo / Susan Zannos. p. cm. — (Biography from ancient civilizations) Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Week 8: Chapter 14: Part 1: Terms
    Week 8: Chapter 14: Part 1: Terms Example Answer Mongols/Mongol Empire - A nomadic culture that depended on the well-being of their herds of goats and sheep. Chinggis Khan (Temujin) – Under him the Mongols and many neighbors were formed into a mighty war machine. He was born in the 1170s by the name of Temujin. kuriltai - A meeting of all of the Mongol chieftains. He was elected to be the khagan of the Mongol tribes. khagan - Supreme ruler of the Mongol tribes tumens - The monogolian forces were divided into armies made up of fighting units called tumens, each consisting of 10,000 warriors. Tangut - Khan’s first campaigns humbled the Tangut of Xia-Xia in northwest China. Muhammad Shah II - He was a Turkic ruler of the Khwarazm ruler to the west. Khan demanded that he submit to Khan, but he was outraged and killed his envoys and sent their shaved heads back to Khan. Khan overwhelmed the empire. Karakorum - Khan established this as a capital on the steppes and had the wise and the clever come to live in lavish tents which made up a palace. shamanistic religion/beliefs - Khan’s belief system. They were focused on nature spirits. Batu – He was the son of Jochi and the grandson of Khan. Jochi died before Khan did, and Khan honored Batu with a share of the kingdom. Ogadei - Chosen by Khan to be his successor. He directed Mongolian energies into campaigns and conquests. Alexander Nevskii - He spared his city, Novgorod, from Mongolian invasion because he was willing to give in to their demands, instead of resisting.
    [Show full text]