Twelve Years of Winter Counts of the Orange-Bellied Parrot Neophema Chrysogaster

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Twelve Years of Winter Counts of the Orange-Bellied Parrot Neophema Chrysogaster VOL. 14 (8) DECEMBER 1992 305 AUSTRALIAN BIRD WATCHER 1992, 14, 305-312 Twelve Years of Winter Counts of the Orange-bellied Parrot Neophema chrysogaster by JONATHAN STARKS1, PETER BROWN2 , RICHARD LOYN3 and PETER MENKHORSP 1Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union, 21 Gladstone Street, Moonee Ponds, Victoria 3039 2Department of Parks, Wildlife and Heritage, 134 Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000 3Wildlife Branch, Department of Conservation and Environment, P. 0. Box 137, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Summary Orange-bellied Parrots Neophema chrysogaster were counted annually in late July from 1979 to 1990 in southern Victoria and south-eastern South Australia. The minimum total winter population averaged 83.9 birds (range 67-126), with no significant change in numbers over the 12 years. The main wintering areas were Point Wilson, Lake Connewarre and Swan Island in Victoria, and Carpenter Rocks in South Australia. The counts were made possible only by the dedication of teams of volunteers. Introduction In recent years, the status of the critically endangered Orange-bellied Parrot Neophema chrysogaster has been the subject of much attention in Australia. More than 70 years ago, Mathews (1917) was concerned for the plight of the species, but 50 years passed before Jarman (1965) comprehensively summarised its status and established just how rare it was. In 1978, the first positive steps to conserve the species were taken. In that year studies were initiated by ICI (Australia) who had acquired land and proposed to build a petrochemical complex at Point Wilson adjacent to one of the bird's major overwintering locations. Plans for this complex have since been shelved. The results of these studies were published in a series of reports and have been summarised in Loyn et aL (1986). Included in the ICI study was a survey of saltmarsh in Victoria which produced maps of saltmarsh communities (Carr & Kinhill Planners 1979). The ecology of the parrot at Point Wilson was described by Loyn et aL (1986). In 1979, a two-year study of the species was funded by World Wildlife Fund (Australia) - its first project. Reports were published on this work (Brown & Wilson 1980, 1981) and in 1984 a plan to conserve the species was produced (Brown & Wilson 1984). This was the first substantial management plan for an Australian endangered species. The plan continues to be implemented by the three States in which the parrot occurs (Menkhorst et aL 1990). The continued support of the Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, the State Governments of South Australia, Tasmania and Victoria, the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union (RAOU), the Bird Observers Club of Australia and the International Council for Bird Preservation has been vitaL Research programs and management initiatives are reviewed by the Orange-bellied Parrot Recovery Team, which meets annually. This paper summarises some of the information obtained, and presents results of counts from 1979 to 1990. Habits and habitat Orange-bellied Parrots breed in south-west Tasmania along a coastal strip of AUSTRALIAN 306 STARKS, BROWN, LOYN & MENKHORST BIRD WATCHER sedgeland and forest patches between South West Cape and Macquarie Harbour (Brown & Wilson 1980). They arrive at their breeding grounds in October and egg laying begins in mid November. The young fledge in January and February and congregate in flocks on the sedgelands, remaining in the area until mid-late March. Adults depart in late February to early March. The parrots migrate up the west coast of Tasmania, through the western Bass Strait islands and across to the mainland. The last juveniles do not leave Tasmania until about the third week in April. The majority of parrots probably migrate through King Island. Some birds may remain on King Island until late May. Orange-bellied Parrots are very mobile and capable of flying long distances. Flocks in excess of 70 birds have been recorded occasionally but the birds are often well dispersed as small groups of fewer than 30 birds and usually fewer than 10. Flocks usually remain separate from those of other species, but individuals or small groups will sometimes feed with Blue-winged Parrots Neophema chrysostoma, or occasionally other seed-eating birds such as European Goldfinch Carduelis carduelis and House Sparrow Passer domesticus. During winter the birds are usually found within 3 km of the coast but occasionally farther inland in saltmarshes bordering large lakes or on islands in estuaries and drains. In Victoria, the most regular feeding habitat is saltmarsh where the seeds of Beaded Glasswort Sarcocornia quinqueflora, Shrubby Glasswort Sclerostegia arbuscula and several other associated saltmarsh plants are eaten (Loyn et al. 1986). The three main wintering sites in Victoria are Point Wilson, Lake Connewarre and Swan Island. In South Australia, the birds are often found in coastal dune vegetation where they eat the seeds of Sea Rocket Cakile maritima and Bidgee-widgee Acaena novaezelandiae, but also feed on saltmarshes similar to those in Victoria. Orange-bellied Parrots spend most of the day foraging on the ground or in low shrubs, and they are readily disturbed. They usually take off when the observer is about 20-50 metres away, emitting a very distinctive, harsh buzzing alarm call which is rapidly repeated 10 or more times as they rise. In normal flight the call is a single sharp tzit given every 2 or 3 seconds. The musical tinkling alarm call of the Blue­ winged Parrot is quite different, and the flight call has two or three syllables. Favoured habitats have a number of common features in addition to availability of food plants. They often contain islands or spits with a varied topography which may provide protection from predators. The parrots are often found in luxuriant stands of saltmarsh that remain dry within a flooded area and they avoid feeding in flooded saltmarsh. Fresh water is often available in the form of channels, lake shores or rainwater pools, though the parrots also take dew from vegetation (Loyn et al. 1Q86; Hewish & Starks 1988). Saltmarsh vegetation appears to provide a larger crop of seed when young than old (G. Carr pers. comm.), and the parrots may favour stands that have regenerated recently after disturbance. Excessive disturbance (e.g. overgrazing) can lead to denudation and obvious habitat loss. At Lake Connewarre, the most favoured stands appear to be those that have established recently as the delta islands expand by sedimentation (Hewish & Starks 1988). Counting It is important to know the size of the population and where it occurs. Annual counts of the whole population of Orange-bellied Parrots are the best available measure to record the effectiveness of actions taken to conserve the species. Counts in the breeding season are not practical as the population is widely dispersed and difficult to locate in the rugged terrain. The most reliable method is to conduct simultaneous counts in winter when the birds congregate on beach-fronts and coastal saltmarshes. VOL. 14 (8) DECEMBER 1992 Orange-bellied Parrot Counts 307 An enormous area of potentially suitable habitat is searched annually, from the Gippsland Lakes in eastern Victoria to Lake Alexandrina in South Australia. Annual winter counts and searches have been carried out since 1978. To search all the potential habitat within their winter range on a single weekend, hundreds of kilometres of beaches and many square kilometres of saltmarsh need to be visited. The counts have involved hundreds of dedicated volunteers, without whom satisfactory results could not have been achieved. Intrepid observers have often had to cope with very swampy ground, thick mud and foul weather with no available shelter. The extensive saltmarshes are often fairly devoid of birds, though the list of incidental sightings is impressive, including Lewin's Rail Rallus pectoralis, Ground Parrot Pezoporus wallicus, and even White Goshawk Accipiter novaehollandiae. Grateful thanks are due to all those helpers who persevered. The early counts, co-ordinated by Richard Loyn and Brett Lane (1978-1982), were funded by ICI Australia and the results published in a series of ICI reports (Loyn & Kinhill Planners 1979a,b; Lane et a!. 1980). Since 1983, the counts have been financed by the Wildlife Branch, Department of Conservation and Environment, Victoria. Since 1984, the counts have been co-ordinated by the RAOU under contract to the Wildlife Branch. Organisers have been Peter Menkhorst (1983), Tim Reid (1984), Angela Jessop (1985) and Jonathan Starks (1986-present). Reports of the results have been produced (Menkhorst 1984; Jessop & Reid 1986; Starks 1988, 1992). During the first year of surveys in Victoria (1978), searches were made at various times during the winter in Western Port (including French Island), the west side of Port Phillip Bay (Altona to Pt Cook, Pt Wilson, Pt Henry, Mud Islands and the Bellarine Peninsula) and along the coast near Port Fairy. Parts of south-eastern South Australia were visited in September, including Beachport, Robe and parts of the Coorong. King Island was also searched in September. In 1979, further efforts were made to co-ordinate simultaneous counts. A team of observers was organised to search all potentially suitable habitat throughout Victoria, South Australia and parts of Tasmania. Counts were made on 3 June and 12 August and people were also encouraged to search for Orange-bellied Parrots at any time between March and October. By 1980, the third or fourth weekend in July (between 22 and 29 July) had been chosen as the most suitable weekend to conduct simultaneous annual counts as the birds were thought to be less mobile than at other times during the winter. In order to determine if the birds moved between sites, counts were also made in the last week of May and the first week in September from 1983 to 1987. After 1987, these counts were discontinued as birds proved too difficult to locate, particularly in September, and the results did not justify the amount of effort put into the searches.
Recommended publications
  • Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary
    Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance: Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary WHY IS THIS AREA SIGNIFICANT? The Kennebec Estuary Focus Area contains more than 20 percent of Maine’s tidal marshes, a significant percentage of Maine’s sandy beach and associated dune Biophysical Region habitats, and globally rare pitch pine • Central Maine Embayment woodland communities. More than two • Cacso Bay Coast dozen rare plant species inhabit the area’s diverse natural communities. Numerous imperiled species of animals have been documented in the Focus Area, and it contains some of the state’s best habitat for bald eagles. OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION » Work with willing landowners to permanently protect remaining undeveloped areas. » Encourage town planners to improve approaches to development that may impact Focus Area functions. » Educate recreational users about the ecological and economic benefits provided by the Focus Area. » Monitor invasive plants to detect problems early. » Find ways to mitigate past and future contamination of the watershed. For more conservation opportunities, visit the Beginning with Habitat Online Toolbox: www.beginningwithhabitat.org/ toolbox/about_toolbox.html. Rare Animals Rare Plants Natural Communities Bald Eagle Lilaeopsis Estuary Bur-marigold Coastal Dune-marsh Ecosystem Spotted Turtle Mudwort Long-leaved Bluet Maritime Spruce–Fir Forest Harlequin Duck Dwarf Bulrush Estuary Monkeyflower Pitch Pine Dune Woodland Tidewater Mucket Marsh Bulrush Smooth Sandwort
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Study of Waterfowl Hunting Camps and Related Properties Within Assateague Island National Seashore, Maryland and Virginia
    Historic Context Study of Waterfowl Hunting Camps and Related Properties within Assateague Island National Seashore, Maryland and Virginia by Ralph E. Eshelman, Ph.D and Patricia A. Russell Eshelman & Associates July 21, 2004 For Assateague Island National Seashore National Park Service Department of Interior 7206 National Seashore Lane Berlin, Maryland 21811 i ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………………. ii ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………..iii INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………..1 Project background Clubs and lodges Definitions Regional context WATERFOWL HUNTING ON THE ATLANTIC ………………………………..7 Delaware North to New York Maryland Virginia North Carolina South to Georgia Assateague Island WATERFOWL HUNTING CLUBS AND LODGES……………………………..21 Land-Based Facilities Water-Based Facilities TYPICAL DAY AT A WATERFOWL HUNTING CLUB……………………….31 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF WATERFOWL HUNTING CLUBS AND LODGES………………………………………………… 33 Owners Members Guests: The Rich and Famous Gender Guides Food Thrill of the Hunt Fraternal Comradeship Ethnicity of Support Staff Role in Conservation ASSATEGUE ISLAND WATERFOWL HUNTING CAMPS AND LODGES…………………………………………………………………..47 ASSOCIATED PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ASSATEGUE ISLAND WATERFOWL HUNTING CLUBS AND LODGES………….49 iii INVENTORY OF RESOURCES…………………………………………………52 Bob-O-Del Gun Club Bunting’s Gunning Lodge Clements’ Beach House Clements’ Boat House Green Run Lodge High Winds Gun Club Hungerford’s Musser’s Peoples & Lynch Pope’s Island Gun Club Valentine’s CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………72 REFERENCES CITED……………………………………………………………76 APPENDIX I ANNOTATED LIST OF GUN CLUBS AND LODGES IN MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA………………………………………90 APPENDIX II PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE OF CONTEXT STUDY TEAM………………………………………………99 APPENDIX III CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FIELD SURVEY…………………………………100 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project benefited from numerous persons who assisted us in countless ways, shared knowledge, and otherwise made this study possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Nepean Forts Conser Vation Management Plan
    Point Nepean Forts Conservation Management Plan POINT NEPEAN FORTS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Parks Victoria July 2006 This document is based on the Conservation Plans for the Point Nepean National Park Fortifications (1990) and Gun Emplacement No. 1 (1988) prepared by the Historic Buildings Branch, Ministry Of Housing and Construction, reviewed and updated for currency at the time of creation of the new and expanded Point Nepean National Park in 2005. ii CONTEXT This Conservation Management Plan (CMP) for the Point Nepean Forts is one of three Conservation Management Plans for historic heritage that have been prepared and/or reviewed to support the Point Nepean National Park and Point Nepean Quarantine Station Management Plan, as shown below: Point Nepean National Park and Point Nepean Quarantine Station Draft Management Plan Point Nepean Forts South Channel Fort Point Nepean Quarantine Conservation Conservation Station Draft Conservation Management Plan Management Plan Management Plan The Conservation Management Plan establishes the historical significance of all the fortification structures centring on the Fort Nepean complex area, as well as Eagles Nest and Fort Pearce, develops conservation policies for the sites as a whole as well as their individual features, and provides detailed strategies and works specifications aimed at the ongoing preservation of those values into the future. The Conservation Management Plan for Point Nepean Forts supports the Point Nepean National Park and Point Nepean Quarantine Station Draft Management
    [Show full text]
  • IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS of MAINE an Analysis Of
    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF MAINE An Analysis of Avian Diversity and Abundance Compiled by: Susan Gallo, Thomas P. Hodgman, and Judy Camuso A Project Supported by the Maine Outdoor Heritage Fund IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF MAINE An Analysis of Avian Diversity and Abundance February 7, 2008 Compiled by: Susan Gallo, Maine Audubon, 20 Gilsland Farm Rd., Falmouth, ME 04105 Thomas P. Hodgman, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 650 State St., Bangor, ME 04401 Judy Camuso, Maine Audubon, 20 Gilsland Farm Rd., Falmouth, ME 04105 (Present Address: Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 358 Shaker Road, Gray, ME 04039) Recommended citation: Gallo, S., T. P. Hodgman, and J. Camuso, Compilers. 2008. Important Bird Areas Of Maine: an analysis of avian diversity and abundance. Maine Audubon, Falmouth, Maine. 94pp. Cover Photo: Scarborough Marsh at sunrise, by W. G. Shriver ii Table of Contents History ..........................................................................................................................................1 What is an Important Bird Area?.......................................................................................1 Qualifying Criteria...................................................................................................................1 Data Use and Applicability Disclaimer .............................................................................2 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Maine's Coastal Wetlands
    Program Support from: Maine Department of Environmental Protection NOAA Coastal Services Center Maine Coastal Program, Maine State Planning Office Maine Department of Marine Resources MAINE'S COASTAL WETLANDS: I. TYPES, DISTRIBUTION, RANKINGS, FUNCTIONS AND VALUES by Alison E. Ward NOAA Coastal Management Fellow Bureau of Land & Water Quality Division of Environmental Assessment Augusta, ME September 1999 DEPLW1999 - 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .........................................................................................................................ii SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................................iii INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT..................................................................................................................... 7 NRPA PERMITTED ACTIVITY IN COASTAL WETLANDS ............................................................................... 8 NRPA PERMITTED ACTIVITY IN COASTAL WETLANDS BY REGIONAL OFFICE .......................................... 11 COASTAL WETLAND IMPACT..................................................................................................................... 14 TYPES & DISTRIBUTION OF INTERTIDAL HABITATS................................................................. 17 TYPES AND ACREAGE OF INTERTIDAL
    [Show full text]
  • The Goose Group
    At the The Goose Group:e dge of the Edge explore the little-documented Goose Group and its anchorages, shore forays and dinghy trips sTORY & PHOTOS BY Jennifer & JAmes HamilTon he Goose Group is at What the islands lack in protection the edge of the edge, they make up for in a unique and diverse and feels that way. ecosystem. White-sand beaches soften the harsh terrain. Seabirds and many Reefs, off-lying rocks kinds of marine life, including sea otters, T and underwater shelves occupy the shores. surround the islands, The islands are part of the Hakai Lux- and their low topography vbalis (pronounced hack-eye looks-bal-ease) provides little wind shel- Conservancy Area, which borders Queen Charlotte Sound. At 1,230 square kilome- ter for anchoring. Evidence tres (475 square miles), it’s the province’s of fierce storms is vis- largest marine park. The Goose Group ible everywhere. Stunted, forms the park’s western boundary and is windswept trees cling to separated from the rest by seven-mile-wide land. Driftwood has been Queens Sound. This separation gives the Goose Group its “edge-of-the-edge” feel. cast high onto the outer The islands are popular with kayakers shores and fills the south- who bravely cross Queens Sound, a body facing beaches. of water that feels open and exposed in 34 • August 2007 • www.pacificyachting.com PY_AUG07_34-39_GOOSE.indd 34 7/12/07 12:59:50 PM Clear water and a bonsai-like tree on a small island between Snipe and Gull islands gave the place a delicate, serene feel.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Shorebird Site 1
    PORT PHILLIP BAY (WESTERN SHORELINE) AND BELLARINE PENINSULA SHOREBIRD SITE 1. Date 13 September 2000 2. Country: Australia 3. Name of site: Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Shorebird Site Network (SSN) Site. The area nominated as Shorebird Site is the same area as that listed as the Western Port Ramsar site under the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran 1971) except in the Werribee-Avalon area where parts of the Ramsar site that do not support shorebirds are excluded (see site map). 4. Geographical coordinates: Laverton-Point Cook: Latitude 370 55' S, Longitude 1440 47' E Werribee-Avalon: Latitude 380 02' S, Longitude 1440 33' E. Lake Connewarre System: Latitude 380 15' S, Longitude 1440 27' E. Swan Bay: Latitude 380 14' S, Longitude 1440 40' E. Mud Islands: Latitude 380 17' S, Longitude 1440 46' E. 5. Altitude: Less than 10 metres above sea level to the 2 metres below sea level. 6. Area: 16,540 ha 7. Overview: The Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Shorebird Site includes a variety of wetland types including intertidal mudflat, seagrass bed, saltmarsh, shallow marine waters, seasonal freshwater swamp, saltworks and extensive sewage ponds which support a large and diverse population of migratory shorebirds, seabirds and waterfowl. The site is contained within the Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar Site. 8. Justification of Shorebird Site Network Criteria The site provides habitat for high densities of migratory shorebirds, and the largest numbers known for Victoria (Lane 1987). The Werribee-Avalon coast is renowned for its high densities of particular species, while a greater diversity of species can usually be found in the seaward parts of the Bay (Mud Islands and Swan Bay).
    [Show full text]
  • 21.02 MUNICIPAL PROFILE the Borough of Queenscliffe Is the Smallest Borough in Victoria, Covering Only 13 Square Kilometres. Th
    LOCAL PROVISION QUEENSCLIFFE PLANNING SCHEME 21.02 MUNICIPAL PROFILE The Borough of Queenscliffe is the smallest Borough in Victoria, covering only 13 square kilometres. The predominantly urban Borough was created on 12th May, 1863, and has remained in existence since that time. It is the only Borough in Victoria to retain an elected Council since its establishment. The Borough is located at the eastern tip of the Bellarine Peninsula and forms one side of Port Phillip Heads - opposite Point Nepean in the Mornington Peninsula. It is surrounded by Bass Strait, Port Phillip Bay and Swan Bay on three sides. On its fourth side, it has a land boundary with the City of Greater Geelong. The Borough is approximately 105 kilometres south-west of Melbourne and 35 kilometres east of the regional city of Geelong (Refer to Map B). Physical Features and the Environment The urban areas of the Borough are located on a series of dunes and sandy limestone ridges, which fall towards Port Phillip Bay, Bass Strait, and Swan Bay. The Port Phillip Bay and Bass Strait coastlines are characterised by primary dunes covered in remnant coastal vegetation, formal parkland, and beaches. There are also limestone cliffs exposed along the coast at both Point Lonsdale and Shortlands Bluff, which are significant landscape features. Although the township of Queenscliff is located on the Peninsula, it gives the impression of being on an island. It is connected to Point Lonsdale by a slender sand dune isthmus called The Narrows, which separates Port Phillip Bay from Swan Bay. This feature creates a natural break of open space and foreshore reserve between the urban areas of Queenscliff and Point Lonsdale.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Seabird Report 2018
    This is the sixth edition of the Northern Ireland Seabird Report, covering 2018. This report is the published outcome of the work of the Northern Ireland Northern Ireland Seabird Network – a network of volunteers, researchers and organisations – coordinated by the BTO Seabird Coordinator, and funded by NIEA. Seabird Report 2018 FRONT COVER IMAGE: CHRISTINE CASSIDY British Trust for Ornithology ISBN No 978-1-912642-03-8 Head Office: The Nunnery, Thetford Norfolk IP24 2PU Tel: +44 (0)1842 750050 www.bto.org Registered Charity No. 216652 (England & Wales) SC039193 (Scotland) Company Limited by Guarantee No. 357284 (England & Wales) Northern Ireland Seabird Report 2018 NI Seabird Steering Group Dave Allen (Allen & Mellon Environmental) Katherine Booth Jones (BTO) Kendrew Colhoun (RSPB) Kerry Leonard (Sterna Environmental) Neil McCulloch (NIEA) Andrew Upton (National Trust) Shane Wolsey (BTO) Report editors Katherine Booth Jones and Shane Wolsey This report is the published outcome of the work of the Northern Ireland Seabird Network – a network of volunteers, researchers and organisations – coordinated by the BTO Seabird Coordinator, and funded by NIEA. British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery Thetford Norfolk IP24 2PU www.bto.org [email protected] +44 (0) 1842 750050 Registered Charity No.216652 (England & Wales) No.SC039193 (Scotland). Company Limited by Guarantee No. 357284 (England & Wales) February 2019 ©British Trust for Ornithology & Northern Ireland Environment Agency ISBN 978-1-912642-03-8 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • This File Is Part of the Following Reference
    This file is part of the following reference: Duncan, Brad G. (2006) The maritime archaeology and maritime cultural landscapes of Queenscliffe: a nineteenth century Australian coastal community. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/2050 Appendix G: Selected Shipping Mishap Landscape Data Appendix G: Selected Community Landscape Data App. G Appendix G-1: Sacred and Revered Landscapes Appendix G-1: Sacred and Revered Landscapes 1) Sacred/ Revered Landscapes A) Burials, Final Resting Places and Memorials Ethnographic data also revealed several areas of special significance to the various maritime communities. These revered landscapes (for want of a better term) were associated with significant cultural events, which were often specific to subgroups within the maritime community. St George’s Church holds special significance to Piloting families for a number of reasons. St George’s banner bore similarities to the pilots signal flag [PF], which may have been a contributing factor for its popularity for pilots. The local church was also the first in the district, and was its establishment was probably influenced by the early presence of the pilots and their associated religious views. The church is also significant for its memorial commemorating the death of several pilots in recent times, and displays the pilots’ running lights as both a gesture of memorial respect, and a mark of the church's similarity for guiding souls through troubled waters. The first burials in the area took place near the front of the white lighthouse and/or near the Crows Nest Camp/ Football Ground where seamen were originally buried, but these bodies were later moved to Pt Lonsdale Cemetery (McWilliams 1865 [plan]; GA 20/11/1866, 29/11/1866) and these areas still hold significance in some sectors of the community as hallowed areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Queenscliff and Swan Bay Piers
    This file is part of the following reference: Duncan, Brad G. (2006) The maritime archaeology and maritime cultural landscapes of Queenscliffe: a nineteenth century Australian coastal community. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/2050 Appendix A: Data Sources, Analysis And Manipulation Appendix A: Data Sources, Analysis and Manipulation App. A Appendix A-1: Sources Consulted for the Study Area Appendix A-1: Sources Consulted for the Study Area 1) Historical Records Historical records were initially consulted to establish a chronological history of the areas to be investigated. Given the time constraints of this project, regional heritage syntheses and broad thematic histories were consulted to obtain both potted and specific histories of the regional localities to be investigated. Several detailed histories of some of the various maritime thematic industries and services were already available for this area: • Customs Service: Day 1992 • Pilots: Noble 1979; “Mark Three” 1884a, 1884b; • Lifeboats - Schutt 1986; Loney 1989a; Boyd 1996; Noble 1979; Syme 2001; • Defence – Noble 1979; Tate 1982; Jones 1986; Kitson 1987, 2001; Nicholls 1988; O’Neill 1988; • Tourism – Wells 1982; Inglis 1999; QHM 2003; Baker and Lawson 2004; Brown 2004 Some abbreviated chronicles were also found for some other maritime sectors: Navigation – Raison 1997; Fishing – Kerr 1985; Raison 1987, 2002 Shipwrecks in this area have already been exhaustively documented (e.g. Williams and Searle 1963, 1964; Loney n.d. a, n.d. b, 1971, 1981; Foster 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990; Anderson 1997a; Anderson and Cahir 2003; Heritage Victoria (state government) Shipwreck Database - Shiplist; Wrecking – Loney 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Nationally Significant Seabird, Wading Bird and Eagle Nesting Islands in Coastal Maine
    Nationally Significant Seabird, Wading Bird and Eagle Nesting Islands in Coastal Maine For many years, seabird biologists from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Maine Dept. of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife have conducted surveys to identify coastal islands that support nesting pairs of seabirds, wading birds, and bald eagles. The table below is based on information last updated in 2002. KEY TO THE TABLE on the following 8 pages): CIR# Coastal Island Registry Number (every island has a unique CIR#) OWNER (May indicate fee and/or easement ownership) IFW Maine Dept. of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife FWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Maine Coastal Nesting Islands NWR ANP Acadia National Park BPL Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands MDOT Maine Dept. of Transportation NGO Non-government conservation organization PRI towns and private owners (E) Privately owned, protected with conservation easement * nesting site -- usually for bald eagles -- on a relatively large island with multiple owners VALUES S Island where 1% or more of the state’s seabird population nests W Island where 1% or more of the state’s wading bird population nests R Island where any number of federally endangered roseate terns nests E Island where bald eagles nest D Island that may not meet the 1% population criteria for any one species, but support three or more species of nesting seabirds MCINWR a Island identified in the Comprehensive Conservation Management Plan for potential acquisition by Maine Coastal Islands National Wildlife Refuge — if current owners are willing sellers and federal funds are available for acquisition. This list of nationally significant islands is intended to provide a helpful reference to inform recreational users and to catalyze protection of high value nesting islands through effective stewardship, management agreements, easements and/or fee acquisition with willing landowners.
    [Show full text]