DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Ireland Seabird Report, Covering 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Inspired by birds, informed by science Northern Ireland This is the eighth edition of the Northern Ireland Seabird Report, covering 2020. The report is the published outcome of the work of the Northern Ireland Seabird Network Seabird Report – a network of volunteers, researchers and organisations – coordinated by the BTO Seabird Coordinator, and funded by NIEA. 2020 British Trust for Ornithology Head Office: ISBN 978-1-912642-23-6 The Nunnery, Thetford Norfolk IP24 2PU Tel: +44 (0)1842 750050 www.bto.org Registered Charity No. 216652 (England & Wales) SC039193 (Scotland) Company Limited by Guarantee No. 357284 (England & Wales) FRONT COVER IMAGE: BLACK GUILLEMOT, BY CHRISTINE CASSIDY 9 781912 642236 Inspired by birds, informed by science Can you help monitor Northern Irish seabirds? Northern Ireland is home to important populations of seabirds at the UK-level, and monitoring these is essential to their conservation. This report relies upon the efforts of volunteers in the Northern Ireland Inspired by birds, informed by science Seabird Network, who donate their time to collect data on breeding seabirds on their local patch. Due to the combined efforts of the Northern Ireland Seabird Network, the NIEA-funded NI Seabird Coordinator and the large annual surveys carried out by the RSPB and the National Trust, Northern Ireland’s seabirds enjoy a good level of survey coverage compared to other parts of the UK. However, each year there are still sites that do not regularly receive any counts. Northern Ireland Seabird Report 2020 What do we need, and why? There are two main types of data collected for the JNCC Seabird Monitoring Programme (SMP): breeding NI Seabird Steering Group abundance data (counts of breeding pairs or individuals at a site) and productivity data (nesting success). Dave Allen (Allen & Mellon Environmental) Additional monitoring of survival is undertaken through the Retrapping Adults for Survival (RAS) scheme. Abundance data are the more frequently collected data, requiring a minimum of one visit at the recommended Katherine Booth Jones (BTO) time of year for each species. Abundance data monitor how populations of seabirds are faring over time. For Kendrew Colhoun (KRC Ecological) example, they help to show which species are increasing and which are decreasing in number, and how this differs Gillian Gilbert (RSPB) between areas (see the species accounts in this report, page 12–60). Productivity data require volunteers to visit Kerry Leonard (Sterna Environmental) a colony several times (a minimum of twice) to record nests and their progress as eggs hatch and chicks grow. Neil McCulloch (NIEA) Productivity data are especially valuable, as they are less frequently collected in Northern Ireland and provide Andrew Upton (National Trust) context to changes in abundance. For example, for many seabird species reduced breeding success is a factor in their decline. Therefore, information on how different colonies around the UK are performing in their breeding Report editor seasons can offer insight into what issues may be affecting overall numbers and inform conservation action. Katherine Booth Jones Get involved in 2021 While the SMP is an annual scheme, 2021 is a particularly important year for seabird monitoring as it is the This report is the published outcome of the work of the Northern Ireland Seabird Network final year of the JNCC Seabirds Count census, a periodic stock-take of all seabirds in Britain and Ireland that is – a network of volunteers, researchers and organisations – coordinated by the BTO Seabird essential for assessing the health of our seabird populations. We still have sites that require survey effort, so if you Coordinator, and funded by NIEA. have time to spare to make a one-off visit part of Northern Ireland’s beautiful coastline to count seabirds, please get in touch with the NI Seabird Coordinator ([email protected]) to be added to the Northern Ireland Seabird Network. Simple introductions to the monitoring methods for common species in Northern British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery Ireland can be found here: https://bit.ly/NI_Seabird_Guidance, and maps of vacant sites can be viewed online Thetford here: https://bit.ly/NI_Seabird_Sites (see page 11 of the report for more details). Norfolk IP24 2PU www.bto.org [email protected] +44 (0) 1842 750050 Registered Charity No.216652 (England & Wales) No.SC039193 (Scotland). Company Limited by Guarantee No. 357284 (England & Wales) February 2021 © British Trust for Ornithology & Northern Ireland Environment Agency ISBN 978-1-912642-23-6 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. Northern Ireland Seabird Report 2020 Contents Editorial ...............................................................................................................................................3 Seabird monitoring overview ................................................................................................................4 Breeding seabirds in Northern Ireland in 2020 .....................................................................................7 Northern Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis) .................................................................................................12 Manx Shearwater (Puffinus puffinus) ...................................................................................................14 European Storm Petrel (Hydrobates pelagicus)......................................................................................16 Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) ..............................................................................................17 European Shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) ............................................................................................20 Great Skua (Stercorarius skua) .............................................................................................................23 Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) .............................................................................................24 Black-headed Gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) .................................................................................27 Mediterranean Gull (Larus melanocephalus) ........................................................................................30 Common Gull (Larus canus) ..............................................................................................................32 Lesser Black-backed Gull (Larus fuscus) ..............................................................................................35 Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) ..........................................................................................................37 Great Black-backed Gull (Larus marinus) ...........................................................................................39 Little Tern (Sternula albifrons) ............................................................................................................41 Sandwich Tern (Thalasseus sandvicensis) ..............................................................................................42 Common Tern (Sterna hirundo)..........................................................................................................44 Roseate Tern (Sterna dougallii) ............................................................................................................46 Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea) ............................................................................................................48 Common Guillemot (Uria aalge) .......................................................................................................50 Razorbill (Alca torda) ..........................................................................................................................52 Black Guillemot (Cepphus grylle) ........................................................................................................54 Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica).......................................................................................................56 Tracking tysties: planning Black Guillemot tagging as part of the MarPAMM project ........................61 In lockdown with Black Guillemots ...................................................................................................63 Declines in Belfast Lough’s dominant winter gull species ....................................................................66 Update on monitoring gulls and terns on the Lough Neagh islands ....................................................71 2020 Seabird nesting report for Strangford Lough ..............................................................................75 Irish marine protected areas management and m-onitoring work in 2020 ..........................................79 Appendix: Species counts ...................................................................................................................80 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................84 2 Northern Ireland Seabird Report 2020 Editorial Katherine Booth Jones BTO NI Senior Research Ecologist and Seabird Coordinator NEAL WARNOCK This is the eighth edition of the Northern Ireland Seabird
Recommended publications
  • TREND NOTE Number 021, October 2012

    TREND NOTE Number 021, October 2012

    SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE TREND NOTE Number 021, October 2012 SEABIRDS IN SCOTLAND Prepared by Simon Foster and Sue Marrs of SNH Knowledge Information Management Unit using results from the Seabird Monitoring Programme and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee Scotland has internationally important populations of several seabirds. Their conservation is assisted through a network of designated sites. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the 50 Special Protection Areas (SPA) which have seabirds listed as a feature of interest. The map shows the widespread nature of the sites and the predominance of important seabird areas on the Northern Isles (Orkney and Shetland), where some of our largest seabird colonies are present. The most recent estimate of seabird populations was obtained from Birds of Scotland (Forrester et al., 2007). Table 1 shows the population levels for all seabirds regularly breeding in Scotland. Table 1: Population Estimates for Breeding Seabirds in Scotland. Figure 1: Special Protection Areas for Seabirds Breeding in Scotland. Species* Unit** Estimate Key Points Northern fulmar 486,000 AOS Manx shearwater 126,545 AOS Trends are described for 11 of the 24 European storm-petrel 31,570+ AOS species of seabirds breeding in Leach’s storm-petrel 48,057 AOS Scotland Northern gannet 182,511 AOS Great cormorant c. 3,600 AON Nine have shown sustained declines European shag 21,500-30,000 PAIRS over the past 20 years. Two have Arctic skua 2,100 AOT remained stable. Great skua 9,650 AOT The reasons for the declines are Black headed
  • First Bolivian Record of Laughing Gull Leucophaeus Atricilla, and Two Noteworthy Records of Fulica Coots from Laguna Guapilo, Dpto

    First Bolivian Record of Laughing Gull Leucophaeus Atricilla, and Two Noteworthy Records of Fulica Coots from Laguna Guapilo, Dpto

    Cotinga 41 First Bolivian record of Laughing Gull Leucophaeus atricilla, and two noteworthy records of Fulica coots from Laguna Guapilo, dpto. Santa Cruz Matthew L. Brady, Anna E. Hiller, Damián I. Rumiz, Nanuq L. Herzog-Hamel and Sebastian K. Herzog Received 30 November 2018; fnal revision accepted 29 April 2019 Cotinga 41 (2019): 98–100 published online 21 June 2019 El 28 de enero de 2018, durante una visita a laguna Guapilo, al este de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, depto. Santa Cruz, Bolivia, observamos una Gaviota Reidora Leucophaeus atricilla, el primer registro en Bolivia. Adicionalmente, observamos comportamiento indicativo de anidación de la Gallareta Chica Fulica leucoptera, una especie que se consideraba como visitante no reproductiva en Bolivia, así como una Gallareta Andina Fulica ardesiaca, el primer registro para el depto. Santa Cruz. La reproducción de F. leucoptera en la laguna Guapilo fue confrmada el 5 de mayo de 2018 mediante la fotografía de un polluelo. On 28 January 2018, MLB, AEH, NLH-H and We aged the bird during the observation SKH observed several notable birds at Laguna based on the following combination of characters: Guapilo (17°46’50”S 63°05’48”W), a semi-urban uniformly dark primaries, without the white apical park 8.9 km east of Santa Cruz city centre, dpto. spots typical of older birds; a dark tail-band; Santa Cruz, Bolivia. The habitat is dominated by a extensive ash-grey neck and breast; and worn, c.35-ha lagoon, with dense mats of reeds and water brownish wing-coverts. These features are typical hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes at the edges, and of an advanced frst-year L.
  • Monitoring Northern Ireland

    Monitoring Northern Ireland

    Northern Ireland RRegionalegional ReportReport ofof thethe NationalNational MonitoringMonitoring ProgrammeProgramme Marine Pollution Monitoring Management Group NOVATIO IN N INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH & RECHNOLOGY UNIT IN T SS O SU C CE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND Northern Ireland Regional Report of the National Monitoring Programme Marine Pollution Monitoring Management Group This report has been produced by: J.P. Breen, IRTU E.L. Donaldson, IRTU M. Service, DANI C. Vincent, EHS Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Methods 4 2.1. Sample Plan 4 2.1.1. Seawater Analysis 4 2.1.2. Sediment Analysis 4 2.1.3. Biota Analysis 4 2.1.4. Shellfish 7 2.1.5. Fish 7 2.2. Sample Design 7 2.3. Biological Effects 8 2.3.1. Benthic Macrofauna 8 2.3.2. Oyster Embryo 8 2.3.3. Fish Disease Studies 8 2.3.4. Dogwhelk Imposex Studies 9 2.3.5. The Mixed Function Oxidase Test (EROD) 9 3 Quality Control 10 3.1. Chemical Data 10 3.1.1. Seawater Analysis 10 3.1.2. Sediment Analysis 10 3.1.3. Biota Analysis 10 3.2. Biological Data 10 4 Benthos 12 4.1. Number of Individuals 12 4.2. Number of Species 12 4.3. Biomass 12 4.4. Univariate Analysis 12 4.4.1. Species Richness 15 4.4.2. Pielou’s Evenness 15 4.4.3. Simpson’s Index 15 4.4.4. Shannon-Weiner 15 4.5. Multivariate Analysis 15 4.5.1. Multidimensional Scaling 15 4.5.2. SIMPER Analysis 18 4.5.3. K-Dominance Plot 19 5 Biological Effects 20 5.1.
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of

    Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of

    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Beasley, Emily Ruth (2017) Foraging habits, population changes, and gull-human interactions in an urban population of Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus) and Lesser Black-backed Gulls (Larus fuscus). Masters thesis, Middlesex University. [Thesis] Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23265/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
  • Psittacine Beak and Feather Disease (Or Psittacine Circovirus, PCV)

    Psittacine Beak and Feather Disease (Or Psittacine Circovirus, PCV)

    Psittacine beak and feather disease (or psittacine circovirus, PCV) Published by The recent diagnosis of psittacine beak and feather disease in wild Biosecurity Unit parrots is a cause of concern to the Department of Conservation. It Department of Conservation was diagnosed in a wild eastern rosella in the Wellington region in PO Box 12–416 Wellington, New Zealand August 2003. This disease is caused by a highly infectious virus and April 2004 affects the skin, feathers and immune system of parrots. There is po- tential for the disease to be transmitted to other wild parrots, in par- ticular New Zealand’s native species, such as the endangered kakapo and kaka. The potential impact of this disease on these spe- cies is unknown as it has affected parrot species in other countries in unpredictable patterns. However, the disease, also known as psit- tacine circovirus (PCV), could decimate the already depleted populations of our treasured native parrots and it therefore repre- sents a significant threat to biodiversity. What is psittacine beak and What happens if birds are feather disease? infected with this disease? Psittacine beak and feather disease Three forms of the disease exist: per- (also known as psittacine circovirus, acute (very sudden onset), acute (sud- PCV) is a highly infectious viral dis- den onset) and chronic (long term). ease of parrots that can cause high ju- The peracute form affects neonatal venile mortality, or long-term immu- (baby) parrots and causes septicae- Parrot infected with psittacine nological suppression, feather abnor- mia, pneumonia, enteritis (inflam- beak and feather disease. Photograph: Mary Wagner malities and (in cockatoos) beak rot.
  • Project Case Study: YMCA M-Power

    Project Case Study: YMCA M-Power

    SPECIAL EU PROGRAMMES BODY Project Case Study: YMCA m-power THEME: The YMCA m-power youth project has created an opportunity to inspire young people to Children and Young People promote positivity in their lives and the lives of others, and within our communities. The project is working in partnership with YMCA’s in Belfast; Carrickfergus; Derry- FUNDING: Londonderry; Larne; Lisburn; Lurgan; Monaghan; Newcastle; North Down; and Porta- €3,541,772.95 down. MATCHTHEME: FUNDING: “m-power brought out the best in me. I couldn’t believe the person I was turning out to DepartmentResearch for andEconomy Innovation NI, be. I felt strong and I felt I could be a voice in things we were talking about. I felt I was Department for Rural and helping other people too” Health & Life Sciences Community Development Renewable Energy Participant LEAD PARTNER: "The young people are really engaged and much more positive about themselves and YMCA, Ireland FUNDING: activities within the YMCA. It has been a joy to watch their slow, but steady change and also witness the positive impact they are now having on others. Well done m- €7,727,271.20 power" PROJECT PARTNERS YMCA Management Committee member YMCALEAD Ireland, PARTNER: Southern Region YMCAs (Lurgan YMCA- andNorther Portadown Ireland YMCA), North Down - Ireland YMCA, Youthbase YMCA Newcastle,- The BelfastSouth West YMCA, South East Antrim Regionof (Carrickfergus Scotland YMCA and Larne YMCA); Londonderry YMCA; YMCA Lisburn Ltd; PROJECT CONTACT: YWCA - Monaghan [email protected] Start WEBSITE:Date: 01/11/2017 End Date: 30/11/2021 Social Media: https://www.ymca-ireland.net m-power participants creating a street performance @ymcampower @ymcampower SPECIAL EU PROGRAMMES BODY Project Case Study: YMCA m-Power m-power is working alongside young people, co-creating activities that help build confi- THEME: dence and self – esteem; as well as creating healthy and thriving environments where Children and Young People young people feel safe, comfortable and welcome.
  • Beak and Feather Disease Viru

    Beak and Feather Disease Viru

    Fact sheet Beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) is the causative agent of psittacine beak and feather disease (PBFD), an endemic disease in Australia’s wild parrot populations. Descriptions of parrots with feather loss consistent with the disease date back to the late 1800s (Ashby 1907). The virus is believed to have originated in Australia sometime following the separation of the continent from Gondwanaland, with spread to other parts of the world with modern movement of parrots as pet and aviary species . It has the potential to impact on several endangered Australian and non-Australian parrot populations and is listed as a key threatening process by the Australian government. Of late, the virus also has been identified in various non-psittacine species . Beak and feather disease virus is a 14 to 16 nm non-enveloped icosahedral DNA virus belonging to the family Circoviridae. Formerly, it was believed that the circoviruses recovered from a diverse range of psittacines were all antigenically similar. Doubt was cast on this theory when a virus that appeared to be serologically and genetically different was isolated from cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) (Shearer et al. 2008). More recent research appears to indicate that psittacine circoviruses can be divided into two species and multiple viral strains. Based on work by Varsani et al. (2011), BFDV contains 14 strains, while budgerigar circovirus (BCV), a newly defined species to date only found in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates), contains three strains. However, it is likely that this number will continue to increase as shown by the discovery of two new distinct BFDV lineages in orange-bellied parrots (Neophema chrysogaster) (Peters et al.
  • Barge 1 Lagan Waterway and History

    Barge 1 Lagan Waterway and History

    LAGAN WATERWAY HISTORY Navigable waterways Prior to the advent of canals and railways in the 1700s and 1800s, packhorses and horses and carts or packhorse were the main means of moving stuff. Although Ireland has had a good road network since the 1600s, such roads were poorly surfaced and not always well maintained. The loads transported were thus limited by the hauling power of the horses and condition of the roads. Bulky, low-value goods such as coal, building materials and grain were particularly expensive to transport. Railways solved this problem, but only after the development of reliable steam locomotives in the mid-1800s. Before then, rivers were the cheapest way of moving large heavy loads where speed was not essential. Except for their tidal sections however, most rivers were not navigable for any great distance and the size of boats, and thus of the loads carried, was invariably limited by obstructions such as shallows, rapids and weirs. Navigations and canals Navigable waterways are of two types – navigations and canals. Navigations are existing natural watercourses whose navigability has been improved, whereas canals are entirely artificial channels excavated by hand and/or machine. The pros and cons of each type of waterway are as follows: For Against Navigations No major civil engineering works Prone to strong currents in winter and required so relatively cheap. lack of water in summer, both of which may make navigation temporarily impossible. [This was certainly the case on the Lagan] Summer water shortages are potentially exacerbated by demands of mill owners with prior rights to abstract water from the river.
  • Assessment of Great Skua Stercorarius Skua Pellet Composition to Inform Estimates of Storm Petrel Consumption from Bioenergetics Models

    Assessment of Great Skua Stercorarius Skua Pellet Composition to Inform Estimates of Storm Petrel Consumption from Bioenergetics Models

    Storm Petrels in Great Skua pellets Assessment of Great Skua Stercorarius skua pellet composition to inform estimates of storm petrel consumption from bioenergetics models Zoe Deakin1*, Lucy Gilbert2, Gina Prior3 and Mark Bolton4 * Correspondence author. Email: [email protected] 1 School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK; 2 Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 3 National Trust for Scotland, Balnain House, 40 Huntly Street, Inverness, IV3 5HR, UK; 4 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, UK Abstract Generalist predators may exert levels of predation on particular prey that result in, or contribute to, decline of that prey species. Bioenergetics models have been used to estimate the rates of consumption of Leach’s Storm Petrels Oceanodroma leucorhoa (45 g) and European Storm Petrels Hydrobates pelagicus (25 g) by Great Skuas Stercorarius skua on St Kilda (Western Isles, UK) and Hermaness (Shetland, UK). The models require estimates of the number of indigestible pellets produced from each individual storm petrel consumed, which have previously been determined by captive feeding trials or examination of pellets cast by free-living birds, but which have not discriminated between the two storm petrel species. Here we use information from dissection of 427 Great Skua pellets collected on Hirta (St Kilda, UK) and Mousa (Shetland, UK) to provide empirical estimates of the pellet:prey ratios for Leach’s and European Storm Petrels separately. We found that pellet:prey ratios were similar for collections of the ‘standing crop’ of pellets accumulated over the entire breeding season and samples of pellets cast within the preceding five days.
  • The Herring Gull Complex (Larus Argentatus - Fuscus - Cachinnans) As a Model Group for Recent Holarctic Vertebrate Radiations

    The Herring Gull Complex (Larus Argentatus - Fuscus - Cachinnans) As a Model Group for Recent Holarctic Vertebrate Radiations

    The Herring Gull Complex (Larus argentatus - fuscus - cachinnans) as a Model Group for Recent Holarctic Vertebrate Radiations Dorit Liebers-Helbig, Viviane Sternkopf, Andreas J. Helbig{, and Peter de Knijff Abstract Under what circumstances speciation in sexually reproducing animals can occur without geographical disjunction is still controversial. According to the ring species model, a reproductive barrier may arise through “isolation-by-distance” when peripheral populations of a species meet after expanding around some uninhabitable barrier. The classical example for this kind of speciation is the herring gull (Larus argentatus) complex with a circumpolar distribution in the northern hemisphere. An analysis of mitochondrial DNA variation among 21 gull taxa indicated that members of this complex differentiated largely in allopatry following multiple vicariance and long-distance colonization events, not primarily through “isolation-by-distance”. In a recent approach, we applied nuclear intron sequences and AFLP markers to be compared with the mitochondrial phylogeography. These markers served to reconstruct the overall phylogeny of the genus Larus and to test for the apparent biphyletic origin of two species (argentatus, hyperboreus) as well as the unex- pected position of L. marinus within this complex. All three taxa are members of the herring gull radiation but experienced, to a different degree, extensive mitochon- drial introgression through hybridization. The discrepancies between the mitochon- drial gene tree and the taxon phylogeny based on nuclear markers are illustrated. 1 Introduction Ernst Mayr (1942), based on earlier ideas of Stegmann (1934) and Geyr (1938), proposed that reproductive isolation may evolve in a single species through D. Liebers-Helbig (*) and V. Sternkopf Deutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund, Germany e-mail: [email protected] P.
  • (HSC) Trusts Gateway Services for Children's Social Work

    (HSC) Trusts Gateway Services for Children's Social Work

    Northern Ireland Health and Social Care (HSC) Trusts Gateway Services for Children’s Social Work Belfast HSC Trust Telephone (for referral) 028 90507000 Areas Greater Belfast area Further Contact Details Greater Belfast Gateway Team (for ongoing professional liaison) 110 Saintfield Road Belfast BT8 6HD Website http://www.belfasttrust.hscni.net/ Out of Hours Emergency 028 90565444 Service (after 5pm each evening at weekends, and public/bank holidays) South Eastern HSC Trust Telephone (for referral) 03001000300 Areas Lisburn, Dunmurry, Moira, Hillsborough, Bangor, Newtownards, Ards Peninsula, Comber, Downpatrick, Newcastle and Ballynahinch Further Contact Details Greater Lisburn Gateway North Down Gateway Team Down Gateway Team (for ongoing professional liaison) Team James Street Children’s Services Stewartstown Road Health Newtownards, BT23 4EP 81 Market Street Centre Tel: 028 91818518 Downpatrick, BT30 6LZ 212 Stewartstown Road Fax: 028 90564830 Tel: 028 44613511 Dunmurry Fax: 028 44615734 Belfast, BT17 0FG Tel: 028 90602705 Fax: 028 90629827 Website http://www.setrust.hscni.net/ Out of Hours Emergency 028 90565444 Service (after 5pm each evening at weekends, and public/bank holidays) Northern HSC Trust Telephone (for referral) 03001234333 Areas Antrim, Carrickfergus, Newtownabbey, Larne, Ballymena, Cookstown, Magherafelt, Ballycastle, Ballymoney, Portrush and Coleraine Further Contact Details Central Gateway Team South Eastern Gateway Team Northern Gateway Team (for ongoing professional liaison) Unit 5A, Toome Business The Beeches Coleraine
  • Delegated List Week Commencing 31 December 2018

    Delegated List Week Commencing 31 December 2018

    DELEGATED LIST WEEK COMMENCING 31 DECEMBER 2018 Application Description of Development Site Location Officer Reference Recommendation 1. LA07/2017/0442/F 3 dwellings Lands within Ashleigh development, Approval Bryansford Rd, Newcastle 2. LA07/2017/1825/F Erection of Replacement dwelling No 25 Ballyvally Road, Mayobridge Refusal and detached garage 3. LA07/2017/1842/F Retention of external storage racking Lands directly adjacent and south of Approval and acoustic barrier with proposed No.7 Donaghaguy Close at reduction to racking height and Cranwood Industries, Milltown East extension to the acoustic barrier Industrial Estate, Warrenpoint 4. LA07/2018/0015/F Proposed change of house type and Between 20 and 22 Ulster Avenue Refusal integrated domestic garage Annalong Co Down Northern Ireland BT34 4TX 5. LA07/2018/0776/O Single dwelling on a farm Land to the north east of No 4 Refusal Audleystown Road 6. LA07/2018/0785/O Proposed dwelling and detached Approximately 50m north-west of 78 Refusal garage (infill site) Upper Dromore Road, Warrenpoint 1 DELEGATED LIST WEEK COMMENCING 31 DECEMBER 2018 Application Description of Development Site Location Officer Reference Recommendation 7. LA07/2018/1169/O Farm dwelling and garage and 55 metres southeast of 24 Lisinaw Refusal associated site works Road, Crossgar 8. LA07/2018/1317/F 2no. additional fuel pumps and 61 Upper Dromore Road, Approval alteration of existing canopy Warrenpoint 9. LA07/2018/1353/F New single domestic garage Site 5 (Previously called site 82) Approval (Retrospective) Saul Acres Saul Road Downpatrick Co Down 10. LA07/2018/1354/F New single domestic garage Site 9 (Previously called site 78) Approval (Retrospective) Saul Acres Saul Road Downpatrick Co Down 11.