LETTERS My Best Wishes to All Associated with SILLIAC's Anniversary Celebrations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LETTERS My Best Wishes to All Associated with SILLIAC's Anniversary Celebrations LETTERS My best wishes to all associated with SILLIAC's anniversary celebrations. SILLIAC memories Harry Levy (BEcon '50), ACT. I was delighted to read the feature covering the birth of SILLIAC, Love at First Byte, by Messel's no-fuss maintenance Marie Jacobs (Sydney Alumni Magazine, It was a buzz to read the article about the Winter 2006). I was one of those privileged to building of SILLIAC (Sydney Alumni share in those activities in 1955/56, and my Magazine, Winter 2006). I was a student in recollections may be of interest. Physics in those days. A few hundred yards up from the University of I have just a few comments. Sydney, on the corner of Missenden Road, stood a large green building which housed Somebody floated an alternative name, the administrative headquarters of Bradford ABACUS for Adolph Basser Automatic Cotton Mills (later known as Bradmill Computer in the University of Sydney. A nice Industries). idea, but the name chosen was fine too. Most of the first computers had names (Univac, As the accountant of the company, I was Utecom, Csirac, etc). My favourite was HAL! selected to attend a course on the computer, and in particular, the lectures given by John I would doubt that SILLIAC contained any "old Bennett, who nominated his topic as radio valves" (as stated in your article, p12). I numerical method. think it more likely premium quality valves were used. Vacuum tube characteristics Two characteristics of the course required a change over time and eventually create fair degree of concentration. One was the errors. One tired tube could cause a exposure to binary arithmetic, which took me calculation to crash. a good deal of study to conquer. The other was the obtaining of data for input into I remember the picture of Professor Messel SILLIAC, which had to be taken to the with the soldering iron appeared in the Bradford teletype room and transferred onto Sydney Morning Herald in much bigger size punched paper tape. than in your article. The Herald paid a lot of attention to the Physics School at that time. In the subsequent 50 years, a fair proportion The idea of any academic, even the Prof, of my life was spent in the world of punched attacking the machine with a soldering iron cards. Now, as I sit at my keyboard, inputting must have caused mixed laughter and horror data into my PC, I marvel at the awkwardness among the real engineers. of the paper tape technique and the limits of the SILLIAC memory. Years later when the KDF9 had been obtained, there was a mixed arrangement for At the age of 82, I feel I could not live without computing. An IBM 7040 ran in one room and my computer. I keep a set of accounts on my the KDF9 with its array of noisy automatic PC, but I maintain a parallel set of accounts typewriters was across the corridor. The by hand, as I still have some doubts about the English machine used paper tape and the answers I may get from my computer. I am 7040 used Hollerith cards. Many jobs thrilled to think I participated in those demanded the output from one machine be pioneering years of computing, even if for me transferred to the other for further processing. it may be a case of not so much love at first Not convenient with the different data media. byte, but doubt at last byte! Meanwhile, SILLIAC sat alone down the corridor doing very little. The last I saw of it was a stained patch on the linoleum where it had stood. I was therefore somewhat surprised to read Finally, and by the way, the BYTE had not the article in Sydney Alumni Magazine been defined in SILLIAC's day. That came (Winter 2006) stating the SILLIAC was much later. "Australia's first electronic computer". Some David Paix (BSc '56, MSc '58) credit is due to the pioneering work of the team at the CSIR most of whom were Arts do not compute graduates of the University of Sydney. I was interested to read about SILLIAC in your most recent edition (Sydney Alumni When the University of Sydney decided to Magazine, Winter 2006). build SILLIAC in 1954, the CSIR computer project was terminated and the machine was In 1957 I was working as a clerical assistant offered to the University of Melbourne. with Major Power, Margaret, Dorothy, Ken Renamed CSIRAC, the computer was and Leila in the fees office of the University of operated for eight years between 1956 and Sydney while I continued my studies part- 1964 providing computing services to the time. Each year, the student numbers were university, CSIRO and the general crunched by faculty, course, gender, community. It is now preserved in the residence, and scholarship, and this was Museum of Melbourne. done by hand. Some interesting statistics of CSIRAC: size But 1957 was different. Leila and I spent 40 sq m, weight 2,500 kg, power consumption some time in the Physics building, keying 30,000 watts, memory capacity 2,000 bytes, information onto data tape. We sat in an speed 500-1,000 Hz. It was the first computer annexe across the hall from the main-frame, in the world to play music. using cumbersome tape machines which spat Jill Green (BSc '72) out tapes full of holes as we typed. These tapes were then fed in pairs into SILLIAC to obtain the results. All was going well until we fed Arts Irregular into the computer, and it Intelligent Debate spat the dummy. In the current Sydney Alumni Magazine (Winter 2006) Dr. Ankeny in her essay on It was a far cry from the spreadsheets and intelligent design concludes that a good databases we use now. But what an exciting outcome to the current debate would be that experience! we may all make intelligent choices about Robyn Jessiman nee Black (BA ’65) Wagga what to believe and who to trust. Yes indeed. Wagga, NSW But her essay fails in a number of respects to further our progress towards this objective. SILLIAC: Australia's First Computer? On 16 June 2006 I attended the 50th 1. The alternatives for choice. anniversary celebration of computing at the The alternatives are not what Dr Ankeny says University of Melbourne. Computing they are. For example, she strongly implies operations commenced in Melbourne with the that today's proponents of intelligent design arrival, on the back of a truck from Sydney, of and creationists are closely connected. Yet if Australia's first computer. This computer, the she were to update her view from that based CSIR Mark I, was created by Trevor Pearcey on William Paley in the early 19th century to and Maston Beard of the CSIR Division of that of Stephen C. Meyer in his February 9, Radiophysics (located on the Sydney 2006 article in the London Daily Telegraph - University campus) over the period 1947- Intelligent Design is not Creationism – she 1949. It was operated on the campus from might recognise that the issue has moved on. 1951 to 1955. The alternatives today, based on our hugely more detailed understanding of the complex For instance, we have not even the beginning features of living systems and the universe, of an idea about the nature of time, or of are that intelligent design best explains these mass, or of space. Nothing is what it seems features, or there is no design and these to be. features have come to be purely as a consequence of blind chance. I see no conflict between science, evolution theory, and the concept of intelligent design 2. Darwin's view. because they belong to different worlds. Dr. Ankeny fails to make clear that Darwin Intelligent design belongs, probably, to the had a theist view of existence/reality as a field of philosophy, and can't simply be whole. Reasonable exponents of both brushed off. alternatives recognise that evolutionary theory contributes significantly to our Two possibilities exist to explain life: understanding of reality. a) It happened by chance initially, and then evolution thereafter, or 3. Neither of the Alternatives are ex-post b) God put it all together, and then turned it Demonstrated Science. over to evolution for development. Dr. Ankeny's criticism of intelligent design as not being scientific is almost fatuous, and her I have no way of deciding between the two. conclusion that "intelligent design is not just Therefore I remain an agnostic. bad science, it is pseudoscience or junk Harold Taskis (BSc '45, DipEd '46) Helidon science" is little short of abuse. Clearly, Spa, Queensland debate about the two alternatives may best be categorised as what Kant in the 18th century described as metaphysics, rather Australian values than as physics, or 'real' science. Bronowski I cannot tell you how much I enjoy receiving takes this further in his 1978 The Origins of the Sydney Alumni Magazine and other Knowledge and Imagination with what he University of Sydney publications. They never calls natural philosophy, discussed in the light fail to inform, but also to present opinions that of scientific knowledge that has arisen in the stimulate thought. last 50 years. We now have at least a doubling of the further scientific knowledge In the letters pages of the Sydney Alumni arisen in the last 30 years. Intelligent debate Magazine (Winter 2006) you featured a letter from this starting point as to available from Charles Littrell, in which he suggests evidence and its pros and cons may best some distinctly Australian values. His further our understanding of a matter that is opinions certainly stimulated my thoughts.
Recommended publications
  • The 1-Bit Instrument: the Fundamentals of 1-Bit Synthesis
    BLAKE TROISE The 1-Bit Instrument The Fundamentals of 1-Bit Synthesis, Their Implementational Implications, and Instrumental Possibilities ABSTRACT The 1-bit sonic environment (perhaps most famously musically employed on the ZX Spectrum) is defined by extreme limitation. Yet, belying these restrictions, there is a surprisingly expressive instrumental versatility. This article explores the theory behind the primary, idiosyncratically 1-bit techniques available to the composer-programmer, those that are essential when designing “instruments” in 1-bit environments. These techniques include pulse width modulation for timbral manipulation and means of generating virtual polyph- ony in software, such as the pin pulse and pulse interleaving techniques. These methodologies are considered in respect to their compositional implications and instrumental applications. KEYWORDS chiptune, 1-bit, one-bit, ZX Spectrum, pulse pin method, pulse interleaving, timbre, polyphony, history 2020 18 May on guest by http://online.ucpress.edu/jsmg/article-pdf/1/1/44/378624/jsmg_1_1_44.pdf from Downloaded INTRODUCTION As unquestionably evident from the chipmusic scene, it is an understatement to say that there is a lot one can do with simple square waves. One-bit music, generally considered a subdivision of chipmusic,1 takes this one step further: it is the music of a single square wave. The only operation possible in a -bit environment is the variation of amplitude over time, where amplitude is quantized to two states: high or low, on or off. As such, it may seem in- tuitively impossible to achieve traditionally simple musical operations such as polyphony and dynamic control within a -bit environment. Despite these restrictions, the unique tech- niques and auditory tricks of contemporary -bit practice exploit the limits of human per- ception.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Computer Language Selection
    The History of Computer Language Selection Kevin R. Parker College of Business, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho USA [email protected] Bill Davey School of Business Information Technology, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia [email protected] Abstract: This examines the history of computer language choice for both industry use and university programming courses. The study considers events in two developed countries and reveals themes that may be common in the language selection history of other developed nations. History shows a set of recurring problems for those involved in choosing languages. This study shows that those involved in the selection process can be informed by history when making those decisions. Keywords: selection of programming languages, pragmatic approach to selection, pedagogical approach to selection. 1. Introduction The history of computing is often expressed in terms of significant hardware developments. Both the United States and Australia made early contributions in computing. Many trace the dawn of the history of programmable computers to Eckert and Mauchly’s departure from the ENIAC project to start the Eckert-Mauchly Computer Corporation. In Australia, the history of programmable computers starts with CSIRAC, the fourth programmable computer in the world that ran its first test program in 1949. This computer, manufactured by the government science organization (CSIRO), was used into the 1960s as a working machine at the University of Melbourne and still exists as a complete unit at the Museum of Victoria in Melbourne. Australia’s early entry into computing makes a comparison with the United States interesting. These early computers needed programmers, that is, people with the expertise to convert a problem into a mathematical representation directly executable by the computer.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Years of Computing in Victoria(PDF
    60 Years of Computing in Victoria 14 JUNE 1956 14 JUNE 2016 WELCOME Justin Zobel HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTING & INFORMATION SYSTEMS, MELBOURNE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE We are celebrating the 60th anniversary of computing in Victoria. CSIRAC, Australia’s first computer, resumed operations at the University of Melbourne on 14 June 1956, after being moved from Sydney. CSIRAC is the world’s oldest intact computer, and is now on permanent display at the Melbourne Museum. Many people contributed to this outcome, but in particular Dr Peter Thorne both led the technical work of restoration and made the case for it to be exhibited and conserved - thus giving us and future generations an opportunity to fully appreciate the roots of computing. CSIRAC was originally built in Sydney by the CSIRO before being transferred to The University of Melbourne We welcome this anniversary as an opportunity to highlight the history of computing technology and its impact on our society. TODAY’S SMART MACHINES Not coincidentally, we are also celebrating 60 years of computing education and research at The University of Melbourne. From small OWE MUCH TO AUSTRALIA’S beginnings in the 1950s, the Department of Computing & Information Systems, as it is now known, has become an international FIRST COMPUTER leader in information technology. During the week we look at the remarkable By Justin Zobel SILLIAC, which was launched in September achievements of computing. We have 1956), and operated until 1964. It is now commissioned a series of articles to illustrate Australia’s first computer weighed two a permanent exhibit at Museum Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetics: a History of the Electronically Generated Image In
    Leonardo_36-3_175-254 5/9/03 9:45 AM Page 187 G C HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE L R O O B S A S L I Synthetics: A History of the N G Electronically Generated Image S in Australia ABSTRACT This paper takes a brief look at the early years of computer- graphic and video- synthesizer–driven image Stephen Jones production in Australia. It begins with the first (known) Australian data visualization, in 1957, and proceeds through the composit- ing of computer graphics and video effects in the music videos of the late 1980s. The his article surveys the development of com- netic Serendipity exhibition at the author surveys the types of T work produced by workers on puter art and video synthesis in Australia from its earliest man- Institute of Contemporary Art in ifestation through to the late 1980s. I focus on the artists and London [6]. He returned to Aus- the computer graphics and video synthesis systems of the the technologies they used, with pointers to cultural/aesthetic tralia with a collection of CG slides early period and draws out issues. The technologies derive from computing—both ana- from artists and programmers and some indications of the influ- log, which evolved into audio and video synthesizers, and dig- began to proselytize computer art ences and interactions among ital, which was domesticated over this period. to students and computing profes- artists and engineers and the technical systems they had sionals there [7]. Artists and com- available, which guided the puters did not mix in those days. evolution of the field for artistic DATA VISUALIZATION The process of writing and running production.
    [Show full text]
  • A Large Routine
    A large routine Freek Wiedijk It is not widely known, but already in June 1949∗ Alan Turing had the main concepts that still are the basis for the best approach to program verification known today (and for which Tony Hoare developed a logic in 1969). In his three page paper Checking a large routine, Turing describes how to verify the correctness of a program that calculates the factorial function by repeated additions. He both shows how to use invariants to establish the correctness of this program, as well as how to use a variant to establish termination. In the paper the program is only presented as a flow chart. A modern C rendering is: int fac (int n) { int s, r, u, v; for (u = r = 1; v = u, r < n; r++) for (s = 1; u += v, s++ < r; ) ; return u; } Turing's paper seems not to have been properly appreciated at the time. At the EDSAC conference where Turing presented the paper, Douglas Hartree criticized that the correctness proof sketched by Turing should not be called inductive. From a modern point of view this is clearly absurd. Marc Schoolderman first told me about this paper (and in his master's thesis used the modern Why3 tool of Jean-Christophe Filli^atreto make Turing's paper fully precise; he also wrote the above C version of Turing's program). He then challenged me to speculate what specific computer Turing had in mind in the paper, and what the actual program for that computer might have been. My answer is that the `EPICAC'y of this paper probably was the Manchester Mark 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Quantum Computing: Inverse FFT Sound Synthesis, Adaptive Sequencing and Musical Composition
    Creative Quantum Computing: Inverse FFT Sound Synthesis, Adaptive Sequencing and Musical Composition Eduardo R. Miranda To appear as a chapter in the book: Alternative Computing, edited by Andrew Adamatzky. World Scientific, 2021. Disclaimer: This is the authors’ own edited version of the manuscript. It is a prepublication draft, where some minor errors and inconsistencies might be present. And it is likely to undergo further peer review. This version is made available here in agreement with the book’s editor. Creative Quantum Computing: Inverse FFT Sound Synthesis, Adaptive Sequencing and Musical Composition Eduardo R. Miranda Interdisciplinary Centre for Computer Music Research (ICCMR) University of Plymouth Ada Lovelace House, 24 Endsleigh Place Plymouth PL4 6DN United Kingdom Abstract: Quantum computing is emerging as an alternative computing technology, which is built on the principles of subatomic physics. In spite of continuing progress in developing increasingly more sophisticated hardware and software, access to quantum computing still requires specialist expertise that is largely confined to research laboratories. Moreover, the target applications for these developments remain primarily scientific. This chapter introduces research aimed at improving this scenario. Our research is aimed at extending the range of applications of quantum computing towards the arts and creative applications, music being our point of departure. This chapter reports on initial outcomes, whereby quantum information processing controls an inverse Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) sound synthesizer and an adaptive musical sequencer. A composition called Zeno is presented to illustrate a practical real-world application. 1 Introduction Quantum computing is emerging as a powerful alternative computing technology, which is built on the principles of subatomic physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Computer Music Experiments in Australia and England
    Early Computer Music Experiments in Australia and England PAUL DOORNBUSCH Australian College of the Arts, 55 Brady Street, South Melbourne, VIC 3205, Australia Email: [email protected] This article documents the early experiments in both Australia had been developed, such as the ‘linear equations and England to make a computer play music. The experiments machine’, the ‘differential analyser’ and the ‘multi- in England with the Ferranti Mark 1 and the Pilot ACE register accounting machine’ (Hemstead and (practically undocumented at the writing of this article) and Worthington 2005: 110; Hally 2006: 11–13). However, fi those in Australia with CSIRAC (Council for Scienti c and the calculating machines still required significant Industrial Research Automatic Computer) are the oldest human intervention, so there was a desire to build an known examples of using a computer to play music. Significantly, they occurred some six years before the automatic calculator with some sort of system to store experiments at Bell Labs in the USA. Furthermore, the the data and the instructions for what to do with computers played music in real time. These developments were the data. important, and despite not directly leading to later highly There were some major technological advances at significant developments such as those at Bell Labs under the the time that allowed the realisation of an automatic direction of Max Mathews, these forward-thinking develop- calculator with memory. One such advance was the ments in England and Australia show a history of computing use of thermionic valves (vacuum tubes), as switching machines being used musically since the earliest development devices.
    [Show full text]
  • CMJ 42-3 28-46.Pdf (5.256Mb)
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Arts and Humanities School of Society and Culture Composing with Biomemristors: Is Biocomputing the New Technology of Computer Music? Miranda, ER http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12704 10.1162/comj_a_00469 Computer Music Journal Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press) All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Miranda, Braund and Venkatesh 1 This is the authors’ own edited version of the accepted version manuscript. It is a prepublication version and some errors and inconsistencies may be present. The full published version of this work appeared in Computer Music Journal 42(3):28-46 after amendments and revisions in liaison with the editorial and publication team. This version is made available here in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Computer Music Journal Miranda, Braund and Venkatesh 2 Music and Biocomputing: Is Music Biotech the New Computer Music? Eduardo Reck Miranda*, Edward Braund* and Satvik Venkatesh* *Interdisciplinary Centre for Computer Music Research (ICCMR) Plymouth University The House Plymouth PL4 8AA United Kingdom {eduardo.miranda, edward.braund}@plymouth.ac.uk [email protected] Abstract: Our research concerns the development of biocomputers using electronic components grown out of biological material. This paper reports the development of an unprecedented biological memristor and an approach to using such a biomemristors to build interactive generative music systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Submission Template
    European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology Vol.3, No.1, pp. 15-42, March 2015 Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) CATEGORIES AND GENERATIONS OF COMPUTERS Ionescu Andreea The Hyperion University from Bucharest ABSTRACT: This scientific article speaks about generations of computers, PC history, saving data, Von Neumann architecture, input/output peripherals, software instructions, programs, mainframe, minicomputers, microcomputers, supercomputers, libraries and operating systems, computer networks and Internet, introduction to the world of computers, evolution of computer systems, from the literature specialized in computer science. Computers are divided into: mechanical computers-water and gas meters, electromechanical computers-electricity meters, electronic computers (I generation of computers, II generation of computers, III generation of computers, IV generation of computers), optical computers and biological computers. After the highest prevalence, electronic computers are divided into: analogue- electronic computers, digital electronic-computers and hybrid electronic computers. KEYWORDS: Mainframe, Minicomputers, Microcomputers, Supercomputers, Computers, Operating Systems; INTRODUCTION This scientific article speaks about: the electronic computer, the computer science, the Information Technology, PC-History, personal computers, Von Neumann Architecture(an electronic computer with four major modeules: Arithmetic-Logic Unit(ALU), Control Unit(CU), Central
    [Show full text]
  • DATAFLOW COMPUTERS: THEIR HISTORY and to Improve the Hybrid Systems
    D DATAFLOW COMPUTERS: THEIR HISTORY AND to improve the hybrid systems. The next section outlines FUTURE research issues in handling data structures, program allo- cation, and application of cache memories. Several proposed INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION methodologies will be presented and analyzed. Finally, the last section concludes the article. As we approach the technological limitations, concurrency will become the major path to increase the computational DATAFLOW PRINCIPLES speed of computers. Conventional parallel/concurrent sys- tems are based mainly on the control-flow paradigm, where The dataflow model of computation deviates from the con- a primitive set of operations are performed sequentially on ventional control-flow method in two fundamental ways: data stored in some storage device. Concurrency in con- asynchrony and functionality. Dataflow instructions are ventional systems is based on instruction level parallelism enabled for execution when all the required operands (ILP), data level parallelism (DLP), and/or thread level are available, in contrast to control-flow instructions, which parallelism (TLP). These parallelisms are achieved using are executed sequentially under the control of a program techniques such as deep pipelining, out-of-order execution, counter. In dataflow, any two enabled instructions do not speculative execution, and multithreaded execution of interfere with each other and thus can be executed in any instructions with considerable hardware and software order, or even concurrently. In a dataflow environment, resources. conventional concepts such as ‘‘variables’’ and ‘‘memory The dataflow model of computation offers an attractive updating’’ are nonexistent. Instead, objects (data struc- alternative to control flow in extracting parallelism from tures or scalar values) are consumed by an actor (instruc- programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Connections in the History of Australian Computing
    Connections in the History of Australian Computing John Deane Australian Computer Museum Society, PO Box S-5, Homebush South, NSW 2140, Australia [email protected] Abstract. This paper gives an overview of early Australian computing mile- stones up to about 1970 and demonstrates a mesh of influences. Wartime radar, initially from Britain, provided basic experience for many computing engineers. UK academic Douglas Hartree seems to have known all the early developers and he played a significant part in the first Australian computing conference. John von Neumann’s two pioneering designs directly influenced four of the first Australian machines, and published US designs were taken up enthusiastically. Influences passed from Australia to the world too. Charles Hamblin’s Reverse Polish Notation influenced English Electric’s KDF9, and succeeding stack ar- chitecture computers. Chris Wallace contributed to English Electric, and Murray Allen worked at Control Data. Of course the Australians influenced each other: Myers, Pearcey, Ovenstone, Bennett and Allen organized confer- ences, interacted on projects, and created the Australian Computer Societies. Even horse racing played a role. Keywords: Australia, computing, Myers, Pearcey, Ovenstone, Bennett, Allen, Wong, Hamblin, Hartree, Wilkes, CSIRO, CSIRAC, SILLIAC, UTECOM, WREDAC, SNOCOM, CIRRUS, ATROPOS, ARCTURUS. 1 Introduction The history of computing in Australia can be seen as a nearly continuous series of personal connections, both within the country and internationally. The following sec- tions highlight some of the influences on the early Australian projects. 2 George Julius’ Automatic Totalisator There have been calculating aids in Australia for as long as there have been people here, but one of the first mechanical aids associated with Australia was developed by a mechanical engineer, George Julius.
    [Show full text]
  • The IAS Computer Family Scrapbook
    The IAS Computer Family Scrapbook 18 handbuilt AVIDAC computers and BESK 29 production line CYCLONE models from DASK EDB USA, FACOM 201 Sweden, IBM 701 Israel, ILLIAC Australia, JOHNNIAC Japan, MANIAC Denmark MISTIC MUSASINO ORACLE & some cousins ORDVAC ARRA II SARA FERTA SILLIAC GEORGE SMIL MERLIN TRASK R1 WEIZAC by John Deane AUSTRALIAN COMPUTER MUSEUM SOCIETY The IAS Computer Family Scrapbook by John Deane Front cover: John von Neumann and the IAS Computer (Photo by Alan Richards, courtesy of the Archives of the Institute for Advanced Study), Rand's JOHNNIAC (Rand Corp photo), University of Sydney's SILLIAC (photo courtesy of the University of Sydney Science Foundation for Physics). Back cover: Lawrence Von Tersch surrounded by parts of Michigan State University's MISTIC (photo courtesy of Michigan State University). The “IAS Family” is more formally known as Princeton Class machines (the Institute for Advanced Study is at Princeton, NJ, USA), and they were referred to as JONIACs by Klara von Neumann in her forward to her husband's book The Computer and the Brain. Photograph copyright generally belongs to the institution that built the machine. Text © 2003 John Deane [email protected] Published by the Australian Computer Museum Society Inc PO Box 847, Pennant Hills NSW 2120, Australia Acknowledgments My thanks to Simon Lavington & J.A.N. Lee for your encouragement. A great many people responded to my questions about their machines while I was working on a history of SILLIAC. I have been sent manuals, newsletters, web references, photos,
    [Show full text]