DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Danger of Artificial Intelligence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Danger of Artificial Intelligence On The Danger of Artificial Intelligence Saba Samiei A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Computing and Information Sciences (MCIS) July 2019 School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences 1 | P a g e Abstract In 2017, the world economic forum announced that AI would increase the global economy by USD 16 trillion by 2030 (World Economic Forum, 2017). Yet, at the same time, some of the world’s most influential leaders warned us about the danger of AI. Is AI good or bad? Of utmost importance, is AI an existential threat to humanity? This thesis examines the latter question by breaking it down into three sub-questions, is the danger real?, is the defence adequate?, and how a doomsday scenario could happen?, and critically reviewing the literature in search for an answer. If true, and sadly it is, I conclude that AI is an existential threat to humanity. The arguments are as follows. The current rapid developments of robots, the success of machine learning, and the emergence of highly profitable AI companies will guarantee the rise of the machines among us. Sadly, among them are machines that are destructive, and the danger becomes real. A review of current ideas preventing such a doomsday event is, however, shown to be inadequate and a futuristic look at how doomsday could emerge is, unfortunately, promising! Keywords: AI, artificial intelligence, ethics, the danger of AI. 2 | P a g e Acknowledgements No work of art, science, anything in between or beyond is possible without the help of those currently around us and those who have previously laid the foundation of success for us. I hence believe that no such work should be published without acknowledging people who have played a key role in enabling the creators. As such, I would like to take this opportunity and show my gratitude to those without whom this research would not have been possible. I want to thank my supervisor Dr Albert Yeap, for his continuous support and guidance. Thank you for always encouraging me to break the boundaries, think outside the box and write with confidence. Your support in showing me the right path, asking me questions and leading me to ask more questions has had a tremendous impact on the viewpoint I have developed as part of this research. I want to thank my mother, Frough Samiei, for always encouraging me to continue learning. You are the most exceptional mentor and the best friend I have in life. Thank you for teaching me patience, consistency and self-belief by being a fantastic role model to look up to. Your words, wisdom and insightful guidance have always helped shine a light on any path I have chosen to follow. This is a gift to you, and I hope to have made you proud. I want to thank Dawie Olivier, Mike Burk and Craig Young for the time they spent to read my thesis and share their insights to strengthen my research. Your invaluable feedback has helped me improve my work and build my viewpoint confidently. I also would like to thank Liz Gosling and once again, Mike Burk for their mentorship throughout my journey. Your guidance and advice of discipline and patience have contributed tremendously in my ability to bring this piece of work to an end. I hope to have made you all proud. Lastly, I would like to thank all the readers of this thesis and mention that when I started my masters, researching the future of AI, I knew there would be tears. However, I thought those tears would be for all the late-night studies and the fear of missing deadlines, not even once I thought the tears would be as a result of searching the history of human intelligence! Writing this thesis has led me to acquire the tenacity and the desire to do my part in changing the future. I wish, sincerely, that one day, you as a reader of this thesis can hold 3 | P a g e your head up and say that you read the words of someone who contributed to changing the world. 4 | P a g e Contents Attestation of authorship ............................................................................................................... 1 Thesis structure and research methodology .................................................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1: Is the danger real? ....................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Robotics .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1.1. The need-based era...................................................................................................... 7 1.1.2 The curiosity era........................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Machine learning ............................................................................................................. 13 1.2.1. The benign discovery era .......................................................................................... 13 1.2.2. The impactful era of strategising .............................................................................. 18 1.2.3. When we are no longer in charge .............................................................................. 19 1.3. How various industries have reacted to artificial intelligence ......................................... 21 1.3.1. Investments ............................................................................................................... 21 1.3.2. Reactions ................................................................................................................... 23 1.4. Conclusion of chapter 1 ................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 2: Is the defence adequate? ............................................................................................ 27 2.1. What has been previously proposed to address the danger to date? ................................ 28 2.1.1. Self-monitoring AI .................................................................................................... 28 2.1.2. Friendly AI ................................................................................................................ 29 2.1.3. Introducing punishment ............................................................................................ 31 2.1.4. Legalisation ............................................................................................................... 32 2.1.5. Other approaches....................................................................................................... 33 2.2. Are we doing enough to make sure AI is safe? ............................................................... 34 2.2.1. How to know how much attention needs to be paid to AI ethics, regulation and health and safety? ................................................................................................................ 35 2.2.2. Are popular forums involved? .................................................................................. 45 2.3. Conclusion of chapter 2 ................................................................................................... 47 Chapter 3: On the road to annihilation ........................................................................................ 49 3.1 The event horizon of technological singularity – our transition ....................................... 50 3.1.1. The first phase of our transition, AI trust and dependency ....................................... 50 3.1.2. The second phase of our transition, robotic body parts and body bots ..................... 52 3.1.3. The third phase of our transition, cyborgs ................................................................ 54 3.1.4. The fourth phase of our transition, cloud-based brain .............................................. 56 3.1.5. The fifth phase of our transition, cloud-based consciousness ................................... 57 3.2. Scenario 1- A doomsday with unconscious and soulless machines ................................. 58 5 | P a g e 3.2.1. The bright side of humans living alongside super intelligent AI .............................. 58 3.2.2 How we will allow the machines to kill us ................................................................ 62 3.3 Scenario 2- Why can doomsday still happen with replicated human consciousness? ...... 63 3.3.1 What we can achieve if AI is the next evolution of humans ...................................... 64 3.3.2 The dark side of the ultimate singularity.................................................................... 68 Thesis summary and conclusion ................................................................................................. 71 Future work ................................................................................................................................. 74 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 76 6 | P a g e Attestation of authorship I, Saba Samiei, hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person (except where explicitly defined in the acknowledgements),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TEDX – What's Happening with Artificial Intelligence
    What’s Happening With Artificial Intelligence? Steve Omohundro, Ph.D. PossibilityResearch.com SteveOmohundro.com SelfAwareSystems.com http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html Multi-Billion Dollar Investments • 2013 Facebook – AI lab • 2013 Ebay – AI lab • 2013 Allen Institute for AI • 2014 IBM - $1 billion in Watson • 2014 Google - $500 million, DeepMind • 2014 Vicarious - $70 million • 2014 Microsoft – Project Adam, Cortana • 2014 Baidu – Silicon Valley • 2015 Fanuc – Machine Learning for Robotics • 2015 Toyota – $1 billion, Silicon Valley • 2016 OpenAI – $1 billion, Silicon Valley http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/disruptive_technologies McKinsey: AI and Robotics to 2025 $50 Trillion! US GDP is $18 Trillion http://cdn-media-1.lifehack.org/wp-content/files/2014/07/Cash.jpg 86 Billion Neurons https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Human_brain_01.jpg http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2776484/ The Connectome http://discovermagazine.com/~/media/Images/Issues/2013/Jan-Feb/connectome.jpg 1957 Rosenblatt’s “Perceptron” http://www.rutherfordjournal.org/article040101.html http://bio3520.nicerweb.com/Locked/chap/ch03/3_11-neuron.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Perceptron.svg “The embryo of an electronic computer that [the Navy] expects will be able to walk, talk, see, write, reproduce itself and be conscious of its existence.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptron 1986 Backpropagation http://www.ifp.illinois.edu/~yuhuang/samsung/ANN.png
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence: Distinguishing Between Types & Definitions
    19 NEV. L.J. 1015, MARTINEZ 5/28/2019 10:48 AM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN TYPES & DEFINITIONS Rex Martinez* “We should make every effort to understand the new technology. We should take into account the possibility that developing technology may have im- portant societal implications that will become apparent only with time. We should not jump to the conclusion that new technology is fundamentally the same as some older thing with which we are familiar. And we should not hasti- ly dismiss the judgment of legislators, who may be in a better position than we are to assess the implications of new technology.”–Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1016 I. WHY THIS MATTERS ......................................................................... 1018 II. WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? ............................................... 1023 A. The Development of Artificial Intelligence ............................... 1023 B. Computer Science Approaches to Artificial Intelligence .......... 1025 C. Autonomy .................................................................................. 1026 D. Strong AI & Weak AI ................................................................ 1027 III. CURRENT STATE OF AI DEFINITIONS ................................................ 1029 A. Black’s Law Dictionary ............................................................ 1029 B. Nevada .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons
    An Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons As companies building the technologies in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics that may be repurposed to develop autonomous weapons, we feel especially responsible in raising this alarm. We warmly welcome the decision of the UN’s Conference of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) to establish a Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems. Many of our researchers and engineers are eager to offer technical advice to your deliberations. We commend the appointment of Ambassador Amandeep Singh Gill of India as chair of the GGE. We entreat the High Contracting Parties participating in the GGE to work hard at finding means to prevent an arms race in these weapons, to protect civilians from their misuse, and to avoid the destabilizing effects of these technologies. We regret that the GGE’s first meeting, which was due to start today, has been cancelled due to a small number of states failing to pay their financial contributions to the UN. We urge the High Contracting Parties therefore to double their efforts at the first meeting of the GGE now planned for November. Lethal autonomous weapons threaten to become the third revolution in warfare. Once developed, they will permit armed conflict to be fought at a scale greater than ever, and at timescales faster than humans can comprehend. These can be weapons of terror, weapons that despots and terrorists use against innocent populations, and weapons hacked to behave in undesirable ways. We do not have long to act. Once this Pandora’s box is opened, it will be hard to close.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Ape and Artilect Createspace V2
    Between Ape and Artilect Conversations with Pioneers of Artificial General Intelligence and Other Transformative Technologies Interviews Conducted and Edited by Ben Goertzel This work is offered under the following license terms: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0) See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details Copyright © 2013 Ben Goertzel All rights reserved. ISBN: ISBN-13: “Man is a rope stretched between the animal and the Superman – a rope over an abyss.” -- Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra Table&of&Contents& Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7! Itamar Arel: AGI via Deep Learning ................................................................. 11! Pei Wang: What Do You Mean by “AI”? .......................................................... 23! Joscha Bach: Understanding the Mind ........................................................... 39! Hugo DeGaris: Will There be Cyborgs? .......................................................... 51! DeGaris Interviews Goertzel: Seeking the Sputnik of AGI .............................. 61! Linas Vepstas: AGI, Open Source and Our Economic Future ........................ 89! Joel Pitt: The Benefits of Open Source for AGI ............................................ 101! Randal Koene: Substrate-Independent Minds .............................................. 107! João Pedro de Magalhães: Ending Aging ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Disruptive Technologies | Imperial Tech Foresight
    A dashboard of 100 wonderful, weird (and possibly worrying) ways TABLE OF DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES the world might change in the foreseeable future Example of organizations active in each area HIGH De Ps Ht Hc Da Sp El Vr Co Qt 1 Monit (South Korea), Abena Nova (Denmark), 32 Blue River Technology (US), Hortau (Canada) 66 BioTeq (UK), Grindhouse Wetwear (US), Dangerous Digital footprint Personal digital Human head Human cloning & Distributed autono- Space solar power Space elevators Fully immersive Artificial We can't talk about Siempre Secos (Spain) Things (US), see also The Eyeborg Project and the eraser shields transplants de-extinction mous corporations virtual reality (VR) consciousness this one 33 Google/Waymo (US), Voyage (US), Nvidia Automotive Cyborg Foundation 2 Statoil (Norway), Siemens (Germany), Volturn (US), (US), most major auto-makers 91 DE 92 DE 93 HA 94 HA 95 DE 96 SP 97 SP 98 DE 99 EA 100 UMaine (US) 67 Alphabet/Google Genomics (US), Amazon (US), Illumina 34 Amazon (US), Google/Alphabet (US), Philips (US), Oxford Nanopore Technologies/Metrichor (UK) 3 Green Skies Vertical Farms (US), Aero Farms (US), (Netherlands), Samsung (South Korea), Dyson (UK), Neo Farms (Germany), Urban Crop Solutions (Belgium) Miele (Germany), iRobot (US) 68 CTRL-Labs (US), Emotiv (US), Neuralink (US), maybe Facebook (US) CiCiCi LeLeLe SaSaSa BrBrBr AdAdAd AbAbAb IsIsIs PhPhPh ThThTh Te 4 WiTricity (US), Powermat (Israel), Apple/Power By Proxi 35 Google/Alphabet (US), Amazon (US), Flirtey (US) Conversational Life-expectancy Stratospheric Battlefield
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the Editor
    Articles Letters to the Editor Research Priorities for is a product of human intelligence; we puter scientists, innovators, entrepre - cannot predict what we might achieve neurs, statisti cians, journalists, engi - Robust and Beneficial when this intelligence is magnified by neers, authors, professors, teachers, stu - Artificial Intelligence: the tools AI may provide, but the eradi - dents, CEOs, economists, developers, An Open Letter cation of disease and poverty are not philosophers, artists, futurists, physi - unfathomable. Because of the great cists, filmmakers, health-care profes - rtificial intelligence (AI) research potential of AI, it is important to sionals, research analysts, and members Ahas explored a variety of problems research how to reap its benefits while of many other fields. The earliest signa - and approaches since its inception, but avoiding potential pitfalls. tories follow, reproduced in order and as for the last 20 years or so has been The progress in AI research makes it they signed. For the complete list, see focused on the problems surrounding timely to focus research not only on tinyurl.com/ailetter. - ed. the construction of intelligent agents making AI more capable, but also on Stuart Russell, Berkeley, Professor of Com - — systems that perceive and act in maximizing the societal benefit of AI. puter Science, director of the Center for some environment. In this context, Such considerations motivated the “intelligence” is related to statistical Intelligent Systems, and coauthor of the AAAI 2008–09 Presidential Panel on standard textbook Artificial Intelligence: a and economic notions of rationality — Long-Term AI Futures and other proj - Modern Approach colloquially, the ability to make good ects on AI impacts, and constitute a sig - Tom Dietterich, Oregon State, President of decisions, plans, or inferences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Machine
    EXPLORING THE INCREASINGLY BLURRED LINES BETWEEN HUMANS AND TECHNOLOGY COMPILED BY HOWIE BAUM Almost everyone in the OUR TECHNOLOGY IS AN EXTENSION OF OUR world has a life, dependent HUMANITY on technology. More than a billion people right now are already dependent on assistive technologies like: ❖ Hearing aids ❖ Pacemakers ❖ Prosthetic limbs ❖ Wheelchairs. 1/3 of the world’s population will be wearing glasses or contact lenses by the end of this decade. TYPES OF HUMAN AUGMENTATION The types of Human Augmentation in order of importance can be divided into 2 categories: MOST IMPORTANT: PHYSICAL AND COGNITIVE (THINKING) LEAST IMPORTANT: PERSONALITY AND COSMETIC SIMILAR WORDS ABOUT THE HUMAN MACHINE BIONIC HUMAN TRANSHUMAN AUGMENTED HUMAN CYBORG EYEBORG CYBERNETICS ENHANCED HUMANS HUMAN AUGMENTICS Transhumanism’ is an ‘intellectual and cultural movement’ that promotes the use of technology in order to advance the human condition. What this essentially means, is that a transhumanist is someone who believes we should use technology in order to give ourselves: ▪ Enhanced abilities ▪ Higher IQ’s ▪ Greater strength ▪ Longer lifespans ▪ Sharper senses, etc. Bionic leg components: (a) the artificial hip, (b) artificial knee, and (c) “blade runner” prostheses made with carbon fiber “blades”. A MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN THE WORLD ARE DEPENDENT ON TECHNOLOGY ❖ Hearing aids ❖ Glasses ❖ Medications ❖ Prosthetics ❖ Smartphones ❖ Contraceptives ❖ Wheelchairs Human existence is a cycle of inventing things to shape life, and in turn, be shaped. There is no “natural” state for humans, not since we mastered fire. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBiOQKonkWs 4.5 minutes The term “Cyborg” was coined in 1960 by scientists Manfred Clynes and Nathan Kline as part of discussions during the Space Race.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial AI 2017
    Beneficial AI 2017 Participants & Attendees 1 Anthony Aguirre is a Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Cruz. He has worked on a wide variety of topics in theoretical cosmology and fundamental physics, including inflation, black holes, quantum theory, and information theory. He also has strong interest in science outreach, and has appeared in numerous science documentaries. He is a co-founder of the Future of Life Institute, the Foundational Questions Institute, and Metaculus (http://www.metaculus.com/). Sam Altman is president of Y Combinator and was the cofounder of Loopt, a location-based social networking app. He also co-founded OpenAI with Elon Musk. Sam has invested in over 1,000 companies. Dario Amodei is the co-author of the recent paper Concrete Problems in AI Safety, which outlines a pragmatic and empirical approach to making AI systems safe. Dario is currently a research scientist at OpenAI, and prior to that worked at Google and Baidu. Dario also helped to lead the project that developed Deep Speech 2, which was named one of 10 “Breakthrough Technologies of 2016” by MIT Technology Review. Dario holds a PhD in physics from Princeton University, where he was awarded the Hertz Foundation doctoral thesis prize. Amara Angelica is Research Director for Ray Kurzweil, responsible for books, charts, and special projects. Amara’s background is in aerospace engineering, in electronic warfare, electronic intelligence, human factors, and computer systems analysis areas. A co-founder and initial Academic Model/Curriculum Lead for Singularity University, she was formerly on the board of directors of the National Space Society, is a member of the Space Development Steering Committee, and is a professional member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
    [Show full text]
  • Keynote: Can We Coexist with Superintelligent Machines?
    ETC. the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision- making, and translation between languages. -- The New Oxford American Dictionary. 3rd ed. the ability to achieve goals in a variety of novel environments, and to learn. We humans steer the future not because we’re the fastest creature or the strongest creature. We steer the future because we’re the most intelligent. When we share the planet with creatures more intelligent than we are, they’ll steer the future. … a century from now, nobody will much care about how long it took (to create superintelligence in a machine), only what happened next. It’s likely that machines will be smarter than us before the end of the century— not just at chess or trivia questions but at just about everything, from mathematics and engineering to science and medicine. — Gary Marcus, The New Yorker Machines will follow a path that mirrors the evolution of humans. Ultimately however, self- aware, self-improving machines will evolve beyond humans’ ability to control or even understand them. – Ray Kurzweil Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an 'intelligence explosion,' and the intelligence of man would be left far behind. Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make..
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine 2018 0 Contents Intro
    TOGETHER Magazine 2018 0 Contents Intro HUMAN & MACHINE CONTENTS 1 04 PAGE HUMAN & DYNAMICS & 1 MACHINE 4 METALL p. 04 When partnership p. 20 In the fast-paced sport of begins with technology wheelchair basketball, in your own body. no balls end up in the TEAM SPIRIT basket without a special measure of team spirit. MY PARTNER, 2 THE ROBOT 08 DIVERSE & p. 07 Industrial and service 5 LIMITLESS PAGE robots are increasingly part of our lives: an p. 24 Explore this surprising infographic. partnership potpourri. TEAM SPIRIT TUBE 2 6 CONVEYANCE Partnerships at p. 08 TÜV SÜD – as diverse p. 26 Together on the way to as the company itself. the fastest tubes in the world: the Hyperloop vision. MIND & MAGIC 3 Living and researching SECURITY p. 18 together – is it possible? 7 NETWORK DYNAMICS & METALL TUBE CONVEYANCE Two married scientists describe their relation- p. 28 A strong initiative: more ship … security in cyberspace 4 6 through the Charter of Trust. 20 26 MIND & MAGIC PAGE PAGE 3 VIDEO TEASER/ IMPRINT 18 PAGE p. 31 Team spirit moves mountains: experience this directly in our TÜV SÜD videos. 02 “The Next Level. Together.” Under this slogan, TÜV SÜD is setting the strategic course for further development of the company. In a highly complex world, “together” has a special meaning: Only together, within TÜV SÜD’s global net- work of experts and in close cooperation with researchers, scientists, and high- tech companies, can current and future challenges be mastered using new tech- nologies. This magazine is dedicated to the idea of partnership in all its diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Map of Organisation and People Involved in X
    Organizations, sites and people involved in x-risks prevention Global Impact Nano Size and level of AI risks General x-risks Nuclear Bio-risks influence warming risks risks FHI Future of humanity institute Bulletin of IPCC World Health NASA Foresight Known MIRI FLI Club of Rome Organization link (Former Singularity Future of life institute Oxford, link Still exist! Atomic International (WHO) institute very well institute) Elon Musk Nick Bostrom Were famous in 1970s when they pro- panel of climate and large Scientists change includes a division called the Global link E.Yudkowsky link list of researchers duced “Limits of growth” Link Alert and Response (GAR) which mon- Famous doomsday itors and responds to global epidemic amount of work link crisis. GAR helps member states with clock training and coordination of response to is done epidemics. link link OpenAI Oxford Martin CSER EA B612 Elon Musk Programme Cambridge center of existential risks The United States Effective altruism on the Impacts of Future wiki Martin Rees, link The Forum Agency for Interna- Foundation Open Philanthropy Technology, link for Climate tional Development project (USAID) 80’000 hours Nuclear Engineering has its Emerging Pandemic Threats Program which aims to prevent and threat Initia- Assessment contain naturally generated pandemics Got grant from OFP at their source.[129] Global Priorities X-risks GCRI Foundational Skoll Global CISAC tive link Large and Global catastrophic risks Project institute institute, Research Threats Fund “The Center for Internation- interest-
    [Show full text]
  • A Co-Lab on Developing Cyborg Arts – Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Practice Based Solutions
    VOL. 6, NO. 1, 2018 – Page 55-65 DOI 10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v6i1.1948 A Co-Lab on Developing Cyborg Arts – Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Practice Based Solutions Ellen Pearlman * ABSTRACT A co-lab in Cyborg Arts was conducted at Parsons/New School University, a leading design school in New York City, over the course of sixteen weeks. This paper discusses the use of Bruno Latour’s Actor Network Theory (ANT) (Latour, 2007) in facilitating creative collaboration solutions. Previously, an open call had been placed in targeted venues such as Art and Education, as well as a number of technology user groups in the New York City area to solicit ideas and participants. With the assistance of the Cyborg Foundation three teams were chosen to build prototypes of a new cyborg sense: Team Glass, Team Radiation, and Team Haptics. Team Glass strove to make a cyborg sense detecting the rhythm of changes in the sun’s solar flares. Team Radiation made a sense that distinguished between, and alerted the user to different types of organic and inorganic radiation in the environment. Team Haptics used the team leader’s own body as a site environment to correct a medical problem by developing a new cyborg sense. Students from Parsons chose which team to work with. Experts and guests either visited the co-lab in person, or used Skype to converse with the participants throughout the course of the semester. Registered Parsons students stayed committed to the lab in order to receive a grade. Other participants had various reasons to remain involved, such as learning new skills, seeing their ideas realized, or stepping outside of their core discipline.
    [Show full text]