DOCSLIB.ORG

Fm 3-100.38 Mcrp 3-17.2B Nttp 3-02.41 Afttp(I) 3-2.12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fm 3-100.38 Mcrp 3-17.2B Nttp 3-02.41 Afttp(I) 3-2.12 ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINE CORPS UXO MULTISERVICE PROCEDURES FOR UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE OPERATIONS FM 3-100.38 MCRP 3-17.2B NTTP 3-02.41 AFTTP(I) 3-2.12 AIR LAND SEA APPLICATION CENTER AUGUST 2001 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MULTISERVICE TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES FOREWORD This publication has been prepared under our direction for use by our respective commands and other commands as appropriate. JOHN N. ABRAMS B. B. KUNTSON, JR. General, USA Lieutenant General, USMC Commander Commanding General Training and Doctrine Command Marine Corps Combat Development Command R. G. SPRIGG LANCE L. SMITH Rear Admiral, USN Major General, USAF Commander Commander Navy Warfare Development Command Headquarters Air Force Doctrine Center This publication is available on the General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at www.adtdl.army.mil PREFACE 1. Scope This unclassified multiservice tactics, techniques, and procedures (MTTP) publication describes the unexploded explosive ordnance (UXO) threat and provides guidelines to minimize the impact of UXO hazards. It provides warfighting personnel at the operational and tactical levels with information to optimize UXO safety and increase efficiency, while reducing or eliminating losses of personnel and equipment to UXO hazards. 2. Purpose This MTTP provides commanders and their units guidelines and strategies for operating with UXO hazards, while minimizing the impact of these hazards on friendly operations. This publication will facilitate coordination, integration, and force protection requirements regarding UXO during joint exercises, contingencies, or other operations. It also identifies functions and responsibilities for planning, reporting, tracking, and clearing UXO to accomplish the mission, while minimizing the impact of UXO on the operation. 3. Applicability This publication applies to all commanders, leaders, staff, and warfighters participating in joint operations. This publication will assist the joint force commander (JFC), service component commanders, their staffs, and anyone responsible for force protection of personnel and resources. 4. Implementation Plan Participating service command offices of primary responsibility will review this publication, validate the information, and reference and incorporate it in service and command manuals, regulations, and curricula as follows: Army. The Army will incorporate the tactics, techniques and procedures (TTP) in this publication in United States (U.S.) Army training and doctrine publications as directed by the Commander, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command. Distribution is in accordance with Department of the Army (DA) Form 12-99-R. Marine Corps. The Marine Corps will incorporate the TTP in this publication in U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) training and doctrine publications as directed by the Commanding General, USMC Combat Development Command. Distribution is in accordance with the Marine Corps Publication Distribution System. Navy. The Navy will incorporate the TTP in U.S. Naval doctrine and training publications as directed by the Commander, U.S. Navy Warfare Development Command. Distribution is in accordance with the Navy military standard requisitioning and issue procedure (MILSTRIP) desk guide and Navy Supplemental Publication 409. Marine Corps PCN: 14400010500 i Air Force. U.S. Air Force (USAF) units will validate and incorporate appropriate procedures in accordance with applicable governing directives as validated by Headquarters (HQ), Air Force Civil Engineer (CE). Distribution is in accordance with Air Force Instruction 33-360 as directed by the Air Force Doctrine Center. 5. User Information The Air Land Sea Application (ALSA) Center is the proponent for this publication with the joint participation of the approving service commands. ALSA will review and update this publication as required. We encourage recommendations for changes to improve this publication. Key specific comments to the chapter, page, and paragraph. Also provide the rationale for each recommendation. Send comments through the appropriate service doctrine point of contact, for the ALSA Center. ii Army Commander U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command ATTN: ATDO-A Fort Monroe, VA 23651-5000 DSN 680-3454 COMM (757) 788-3454 E-mail: [email protected] Marine Corps Commanding General U.S. Marine Corps Combat Development Command ATTN: C42 3300 Russell Road, Suite 318A Quantico, VA 22134-5021 DSN 278-6233/6234 COMM (703) 784-6233/6234 Navy Commander, Navy Warfare Development Command ATTN: N5 686 Cushing Road Newport, RI 02841-1207 DSN 948-4201 COMM (401) 841-4201 Air Force Headquarters Air Force Doctrine Center ATTN: DJ 216 Sweeney Boulevard, Suite 109 Langley Air Force Base, VA 23665-2722 DSN 574-8091 COMM (757) 764-8091 E-mail: [email protected] ALSA ALSA Center ATTN: Director 114 Andrews Street Langley Air Force Base, VA 23665-2785 DSN 575-0902 COMM (757) 225-0902 E-mail: [email protected] iii *FM 3-100.38 *MCRP 3-17.2B *NTTP 3-02.4.1 *AFTTP(I) 3-2.12 FM 3-100.38 U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, VA MCRP 3-17.2B Marine Corps Combat Development Command Quantico, VA NTTP 3-02.4.1 (REV A) Navy Warfare Development Command Newport, RI AFTTP(I) 3-2.12 Headquarters Air Force Doctrine Center Maxwell Air Force Base, AL 23 August 2001 UXO Multiservice Procedures for Unexploded Ordnance Operations TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ vii Chapter I - UXO Hazards....................................................................................... I-1 Background ..................................................................................................... I-1 Hazards............................................................................................................ I-1 Chapter II - Joint Force UXO Operations............................................................ II-1 Purpose........................................................................................................... II-1 Operational Considerations .......................................................................... II-1 Responsibilities.............................................................................................. II-2 Capabilities..................................................................................................... II-5 Identifying....................................................................................................... II-6 Marking ........................................................................................................... II-6 Reporting........................................................................................................ II-6 Tracking.......................................................................................................... II-6 *This publication supersedes FM 100-38, MCRP 4-5.1, NWP TP 3-02.4.1, ACCPAM 10-752, PACAFPAM 10-752, and USAFEPAM 10-752, 10 July 1996. iv Chapter III - Service Component Capabilities....................................................III-1 Background....................................................................................................III-1 U.S. Army .......................................................................................................III-1 U.S. Marine Corps..........................................................................................III-3 U.S. Navy........................................................................................................III-4 U.S. Air Force.................................................................................................III-6 Appendix A - Identifying UXO............................................................................. A-1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... A-1 Identification References .............................................................................. A-1 Dropped Ordnance ........................................................................................ A-1 Projected Ordnance....................................................................................... A-4 Thrown Ordnance.......................................................................................... A-6 Placed Ordnance ........................................................................................... A-6 Sea Mines....................................................................................................... A-7 Appendix B - Marking UXO ................................................................................. B-1 Confirm the Presence of UXO....................................................................... B-1 Mark the UXO ................................................................................................. B-1 Appendix C - Reporting UXO.............................................................................. C-1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... C-1 Routing........................................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D - Protective Measures..................................................................... D-1 Evacuate........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Field Artillery Journal Vol
    No. 6, November-December, 1931 A Very Modern Piece of Heavy Field Artillery—The 155mm Gun— 8-inch Howitzer ...................................................................Frontispiece The Annual Report of the Chief of Field Artillery ................................. 577 General Braxton Bragg............................................................................. 600 Lieut. R. T. Bennison, F. A., D. O. L. General Lassiter Retires............................................................................ 612 Field Artillery R. O. T. C. at Oregon State College................................ 615 Major F. W. Bowley, F. A. Type Problems ........................................................................................... 622 Heavy Artillery vs. Rockets ...................................................................... 625 Captain M. A. Stuart, F. A. An Auxiliary Range Disk for Use With 37mm Sub-Caliber Tubes on 75mm Gun, Model of 1897 (French) ................................................ 641 Major J. E. Lewis, F. A. The Field Artillery Pistol Team, 1931...................................................... 646 Foreign Military Journals: A Current Resume ...................................... 647 Field Line Construction ............................................................................ 655 Major W. P. Evans, Signal Corps Old Post Chapel at Fort Sill...................................................................... 659 Chaplain Milton O. Beebe, U. S. Army 155mm Gun—8-inch Howitzer (Illustrations) .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (Excerpt)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 16, 1982 East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt) Citation: “East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt),” December 16, 1982, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, BStU, Berlin, ZA, HVA, 19, pp. 126-359. Translated from German by Bernd Schaefer; available in original language at the Parallel History Project. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112680 Summary: The Stasi's own preface to the V Corps/U.S. Army 1981 war plan (which recognizes that NATO's concept was defensive in nature in contrast to Warsaw Pact plans, which until 1987 indeed envisioned the mentioned "breakthrough towards the Rhine") Original Language: German Contents: English Translation MINISTRY FOR STATE SECURITY Top Secret! Berlin, 16. Dec 1982 Only for personal use! Nr. 626/82 Return is requested! Expl. 5. Bl. MY Information about Military planning of the USA and NATO for the operation of the V. Army Corps/USA in times of tension and in war Part 1 Preliminary Remarks Through reliable intelligence we received portions of the US and NATO military crisis and wartime planning for the deployment of the V Corps/USA stationed in the FRG. This intelligence concerns the secret Operations Plan 33001 (GDP – General Defense Plan) for the V Corps/USA in Europe. The plan is endorsed by the US Department of the Army and, after consultation with NATO, became part of NATO planning.
    [Show full text]
  • General Lesley J. Mcnair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S
    General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army By [Copyright 2012] Mark T. Calhoun Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson ________________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann ________________________________ Dr. Christopher R. Gabel ________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey P. Moran ________________________________ Dr. Brent J. Steele Date Defended: April 6, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Mark T. Calhoun certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson Date approved: April 6, 2012 ii ABSTRACT General Lesley J. McNair demonstrated an innovative spirit and exceptional intellectual capacity in his efforts to organize and train the U.S. Army for World War II. The influence he exerted on Army doctrine, training, equipment development, unit organization, and combined arms fighting methods placed him among the handful of generals most responsible for both the effectiveness and the flaws of the force that the United States sent to war in 1942. Through his strong views and aggressive leadership, McNair played a key role in guiding the Army’s interwar mechanization and doctrinal development efforts. Many studies of this period have described aspects of his participation in that process. However, no comprehensive study of McNair’s forty-year military career exists, largely because he did not survive the war, and he left behind no personal memoirs or diaries when he died of wounds inflicted by errant American bombs in Normandy on July 25, 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, June
    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT of the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York June 10, 1941 C-rinted by The Moore Printing Company, Inc. Newburgh, N. Y¥: 0 C; 42 lcc0 0 0 0 P-,.0 r- 'Sc) CD 0 ct e c; *e H, Ir Annual Report, June 10, 1941 3 Report of the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Graduates, U. S. M. A. Held at West Point, N. Y., June 10, 1941 1. The meeting was called to order at 2:02 p. m. by McCoy '97, President of the Association. There were 225 present. 2. Invocation was rendered by the Reverend H. Fairfield Butt, III, Chaplain of the United States Military Academy. 3. The President presented Brigadier General Robert L. Eichel- berger, '09, Superintendent, U. S. Military Academy, who addressed the Association (Appendix B). 4. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the report of the President be dispensed with, since that Report would later be pub- lished in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix A). The motion was passed. 5. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the Report of the Secretary be dispensed with, since that Report would later be pub- lished in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix C.) The motion was passed. 6. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the Report of the Treasurer be dispensed with, since that Report would later be published in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix D).
    [Show full text]
  • Washington National Guard Pamphlet
    WASH ARNG PAM 870-1-7 WASH ANG PAM 210-1-7 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD PAMPHLET THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD VOLUME 7 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN POST WORLD WAR II HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DEPARTMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL CAMP MURRAY, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98430 - i - THIS VOLUME IS A TRUE COPY THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ROSTERS HEREIN HAVE BEEN REVISED BUT ONLY TO PUT EACH UNIT, IF POSSIBLE, WHOLLY ON A SINGLE PAGE AND TO ALPHABETIZE THE PERSONNEL THEREIN DIGITIZED VERSION CREATED BY WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY - ii - INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME 7, HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD BY MAJOR GENERAL HOWARD SAMUEL McGEE, THE ADJUTANT GENERAL Volume 7 of the History of the Washington National Guard covers the Washington National Guard in the Post World War II period, which includes the conflict in Korea. This conflict has been categorized as a "police action", not a war, therefore little has been published by the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army or by individuals. However, the material available to our historian is believed to be of such importance as to justify its publication in this volume of our official history. While Washington National Guard units did not actually serve in Korea during this "police action", our Air National Guard and certain artillery units were inducted into service to replace like regular air and army units withdrawn for service in Korea. However, many Washington men participated in the action as did the 2nd and 3rd Infantry Divisions, both of which had been stationed at Fort Lewis and other Washington military installations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Military Activities Corps Of
    NO INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT, WiLL BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT- PRIOR AUTHORITY FROM THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS ANNUAL REPORT COVERING MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1941 ANNUAL REPORT COVERING IHLITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1941. SUBMITTED TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS BY BRIGADIER GENERAL JOHN J. KINGMAN ASSISTANT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS OFFICE, CHIEF OF ENGINEERS 42/261 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I - Personnel: Page Par. 1 Expansion of Corps of Engineers 1 2 Commissioned Officers 5 3 Warrant Officers 8 4 Enlisted Personnel, Corps of Engineers 9 5 Expansion of Personnel Section, O.C.E. 10 .Section II - Intelligence: Par. 6 General 25 7 Domestic Mapping Branch 25 8 Geodetic Branch 31 9 Information Branch 31 10 Foreign Map Branch 32 Section III - Operations and Training: Par. 11 Regular Army 33 12 Tables of Organization 36 13 National Guard 36 14 Organized Reserves 38 15 R.O.T.C. 39 16 Training Publications 41 17 Education 42 18 Equipment 48 19 Camouflage 50 20 Activities of the Engineer Board 50 Section IV ■ - Supply: Par. 21 General 52 22 Requirements 52 23 Procurement 53 24 -Storage and Issue . 54 25 Electric Power Survey 58 26 Research and Development 58 27 Financial Statement 62 Section V - Fortification: Par. 28 Plans and Development 69 29 Design and Operations 70 Section VI • - Railway: Par. 30 Railway Information 77 31 Railway Plans 77 32 Railway Equipment 78 33 711th Engineer Battalion (Railway Operating) 78 34 Defense Aid 79 SECTION I - FENSONHEL 1; Expansion of Corps,of Engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • FORGING a TOTAL FORCE the Evolution of the Guard and Reserve
    FORGING A TOTAL FORCE The Evolution of the Guard and Reserve Col. Forrest L. Marion, USAFR (ret.) Col. Jon T. Hoffman, USMCR (ret.) Foreword by Lt. Gen. Dennis M. McCarthy, USMC (ret.) former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Forging a Total Force FORGING A TOTAL FORCE The Evolution of the Guard and Reserve Col. Forrest L. Marion, USAFR (ret.) Col. Jon T. Hoffman, USMCR (ret.) Historical Office • Office of the Secretary of Defense • 2018 This volume is cleared for public release. The views expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, or any other agency of the federal government. Portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included. The Historical Office of the Office of the Secretary of Defense would appreciate a courtesy copy of reprints or reviews. Use of ISBN This is the official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of 978-0-16-094388-1 is for the U.S. Government Publishing Office editions only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Publishing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Marion, Forrest L., author. | Hoffman, Jon T., 1955– author. Title: Forging a total force : the evolution of the Guard and Reserve / Forrest L.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War
    Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War R EFERENCE I NFORMATION P APER 105 N ATIONAL A RCHIVES AND R ECORDS A DMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC R EVISED 2006 Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War COMPILED BY LISHA B. PENN R EFERENCE I NFORMATION PAPER 105 NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC Revised 2006 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records of military agencies relating to African Americans from the post World War I period to the Korean War/compiled by Lisha B. Penn.—Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration, revised 2006. 166 p.; 28 cm.—(Reference information paper 105) Includes index. 1. United States—Armed Forces—Afro-Americans—History—20th century— Sources. 2. Afro-American soldiers—History—20th century—Sources. 3. Afro-American sailors—History— 20th century—Sources. I. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. II. Title III. Series 42303670 COVER: “On parade, the 41st Engineers at Ft. Bragg, NC, in color guard ceremony.” Contents Preface . 1 Part I I NTRODUCTION Scope of the Paper . 3 Overview of Pertinent Records . 4 Principles of Arrangement . 5 How to Use This Paper . 5 Acknowledgments . 7 Part II A IR F ORCE C LUSTER RG 18 Records of the Army Air Forces . 8 RG 340 Records of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force. 12 RG 341 Records of Headquarters United States Air Force (Air Staff) . 15 Part III O LD A RMY C LUSTER RG 77 Records of the Office of the Chief of Engineers .
    [Show full text]
  • Special Observers: a History of SPOBS and USAFBI, 1941-1942
    Special Observers: A History of SPOBS and USAFBI, 1941-1942 BY © 2016 Richard H. Anderson Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chair: Adrian R. Lewis, Ph.D. ________________________________ Co-Chair: Theodore A. Wilson, Ph.D. ________________________________ Sheyda Jahanbani, Ph.D. ________________________________ Paul Atchley, Ph.D. ________________________________ John M. Curatola, Ph.D. Date Defended: 06 December 2016 ii The dissertation committee for Richard H. Anderson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Special Observers: A History of SPOBS and USAFBI, 1941-1942 ________________________________ Chair: Adrian R. Lewis, Ph.D. ________________________________ Co-Chair: Theodore A. Wilson, Ph.D. Date approved: 06 December 2016 iii Abstract In late spring, 1941, a small group of U.S. Army officers traveled to Britain to plan for Anglo-American cooperation if and when the U.S. entered World War II. Because the United States was still a neutral country and to prevent potential enemies from knowing the group's purpose, the U.S. Army called its mission to Britain the "U.S. Army Special Observer Group" (SPOBS). From May, 1941 until June, 1942, SPOBS (known as U.S. Army Forces in the British Isles or USAFBI after January 8, 1942) developed plans with the British for establishing U.S forces in the British Isles. Changing strategic conditions however, made much of this work obsolete. As a result, the Allies had to develop new plans for establishing U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS ACTIVITIES in the NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION of the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HABS No
    CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS ACTIVITIES IN THE HABS DC-858 NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION OF THE NATIONAL PARK DC-858 SERVICE National Capital Parks-Central Washington District of Columbia WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS ACTIVITIES IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HABS No. DC-858 Location: Washington, District of Columbia; Arlington County, Prince William County, and Alexandria, Virginia; Prince George's County and Frederick County, Maryland. Present Owner: National Capital Region, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior Present Occupant: Various park units in the National Capital Region Present Use: Park and recreational facilities Significance: The Civilian Conservation Corps activities in the National Capital Region of the National Park Service illustrate the important role of this program in employing out-of-work youth to create a national recreation infrastructure during the 1930s. The National Capital Region work represents a mix of rural and urban projects indicative of CCC initiatives in metropolitan areas. While not as well-known as the rustic architecture built by the CCC for national parks in wilderness areas, the Washington-area CCC camps participated in many types of construction and tasks including parkways, picnic groves, erosion control, playgrounds, athletic fields, historical restorations, and Recreational Demonstration Area camping facilities. Many of these projects formed the basis for later expansion of recreational amenities in the National Capital Region. Historians: Lisa Pfueller Davidson (overview narrative), James A. Jacobs (inventory methodology) Project Information: This overview history and a detailed site inventory were undertaken by the Historic American Buildings Survey program of the National Park Service (NPS), Paul Dolinsky, Chief (HABS) and John A.
    [Show full text]
  • General Douglas Macarthur
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects History Department Spring 4-2015 Defying the United States: General Douglas MacArthur Luke G. Mueller Illinois Wesleyan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/history_honproj Part of the Military History Commons, Other American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Mueller, Luke G., "Defying the United States: General Douglas MacArthur" (2015). Honors Projects. 52. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/history_honproj/52 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Defying the United States—General Douglas MacArthur By: Luke Mueller Honors Research Project April 24, 2015 1 General Douglas MacArthur has long been consiDereD one of the premiere military generals in UniteD States history. Although recent scholarship has scrutinized his failures1, he has maintaineD a renowned reputation. His father, General Arthur MacArthur, famously tolD him, “There are times when a truly remarkable solDier must resort to unorthodox behavior, disobeying his superiors to gain the greater glory.”2 Consequently, Douglas MacArthur establisheD his reputation by disobeying direct orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Intelligence Corps History and Mission in World War II
    1/ U.S. AR MY MILITARY Hl!3TORYtl$jTlWTE WCS CARLISLE BARRACKS, PA 17013-5008 CIC Wwk!OUNTER INTELLIGENCE CORPS I’ HISTORY AND MISSION IN. WORLD WAR II COUNTER INTELLIGENCE CORPS SCHOOL FORT HOLABIRD BALTIMORE 19, MARYLAND . Special Text BISTGRYAND NISSION \ - IFJ woB[D WARII - - - CIC School Counter Intelligence Corps Center LlU, a‘.* ,’ ARMY WAR COLLEGE - ~Ai%WyE BARFiAdI@, PA, THE CORPSOF INTELLIGENCEPOLICE - CHAPTER1. FROM1917 TO WORLDWAR II Paragraph Page- Purpose and Scope. 1 The Corps of Intelligence Police . 2 : - CHAPTER2. ORGANIZATIONFOR WAR The Corps of Intelligence Police is Geared for Action ....... 5 The Counter Intelligence Corps .............................. 5 Personnel Procurement ....................................... 5 The Problem of Rank......................................... 6 1; CBAPIER3. TBE COUNl’ERITVI’ELLIGENCE CORPS IN THE ZONEOF TIE INTERIOR, 1941-1943 The Military Intelligence Division . ..*.......... 7 13 - PARTTWO _I OPERATIONSOF TIE COWTERINTELLIGENCE CORPS IN THE PRINCIPAL TBEATERS CHAPTER4. OPERATIONSIN NORTHAFRICA The klission . ..*.........................................* 8 The Landing . ..*...........****............. 9 Organization for Operation with Combat Troops . 10 Operations in Liberated Areas . Liaison with United States Intelligence Organizations....... Liaison with Allied Intelligence Organizations.............. 13 Lessons Learned Through Experience . ..*...... 14 Counterintelligence During the Tactical Planning Phases..... 15 Counterintelligence During Mounting Phase of Tactical Operations
    [Show full text]