Fort Gillem Timeline 1917-2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fort Gillem Timeline 1917-2011 DISTRIBUTED BY US Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District 2012 PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS SPONSOR US Army CONTRACTING AGENCY US Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District TECHNICAL GUIDANCE Susan Bupp, Parsons Corporation AUTHOR Jennifer Corcoran, Brockington and Associates, Inc. DESIGN AND EDITING John Cason and Meg Moughan, Brockington and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................. 3 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... 7 IntroductioN ................................................................................................... 11 Historical Overview ......................................................................................... 11 Purpose ........................................................................................................... 12 Previous Studies .............................................................................................. 13 A Note on Installation Names and Building Numbers ...................................... 14 Fort Gillem Timeline 1917-2011 ...................................................................... 16 Army Depot/Fort Gillem Commanders ............................................................. 18 PRESENT-DAY Atlanta AND Fort GILLEM ........................................................ 21 Location and Demographics ............................................................................ 23 ARMY Depot at THE CANDLER WAREHOUSE 1917-1941 ................................... 29 WORLD WAR II MOBILIZation AND Depot Construction .............................. 33 Depot Site Selected ......................................................................................... 33 The CCC at the Depot ....................................................................................... 34 Design and Environment ................................................................................. 35 Land Acquisition .......................................................................................... 35 World War II Army Construction Practices and Standardized Designs ............. 36 Atlanta General Depot Construction ............................................................. 38 Depot Infrastructure and Utilities ................................................................. 53 Motor Base Construction .............................................................................. 57 THE Depot AND motor BASE DURING WORLD WAR II ...................................... 63 The US Army Reorganization and the Technical Services .................................. 63 Army Organization Effects Changes to Atlanta Installation ........................... 63 Distribution Areas ........................................................................................ 64 Missions of the Technical Services ................................................................. 65 Impact on Atlanta............................................................................................ 69 Life on Post During World War II ...................................................................... 70 Publications................................................................................................. 70 Events ......................................................................................................... 71 Fires ............................................................................................................ 71 Unusual Missions of the Depot During World War II ......................................... 72 Shoe Shop ................................................................................................... 73 Coffee Roasting Plant .................................................................................. 74 The Depot Historian ..................................................................................... 77 3 Atlanta Motor BASE ........................................................................................ 83 Prisoners of War at the Motor Base .............................................................. 85 Automotive School ....................................................................................... 86 AFTER WORLD WAR II .......................................................................................... 99 Supply Surplus ...............................................................................................100 Morris Army Airfield .......................................................................................101 Explosive Ordnance Disposal ..........................................................................105 Atlanta ARMY Depot Becomes Fort GILLEM ................................................109 The New Mission of Fort Gillem ......................................................................110 Renaming Ceremony ......................................................................................111 Fort GILLEM IN THE 1970s and 1980s ..............................................................115 VA Cemetery ...................................................................................................117 Bicentennial Events .......................................................................................118 Fort Gillem and the Environment ...................................................................119 NEPA and the Development of Environmental Regulations ..........................119 Environmental Improvement Efforts and Issues ..........................................120 Installation Improvements and Beautification ...............................................122 Holland Park Housing .................................................................................123 Scouts at Fort GILLEM ....................................................................................129 ARMY Commands at Fort GILLEM ..................................................................133 Second US Army .............................................................................................133 First US Army Arrives at Fort Gillem ................................................................134 Fort GILLEM IN THE 1990s AND BEYOND ..........................................................137 War in the Persian Gulf ...................................................................................137 Fort Gillem Activities ......................................................................................138 Tenant Organizations and Construction ..........................................................140 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) ...........................................................144 The Future of Fort Gillem ................................................................................147 4 Cultural RESOURCES OF Fort GILLEM ...........................................................153 Landmarks and Historical Markers ..................................................................155 Flankers Road .............................................................................................155 Hardee Hall ................................................................................................155 Holland Hall ...............................................................................................155 Hood Avenue ..............................................................................................156 Iverson Gate ...............................................................................................156 McIntosh Gate ............................................................................................156 Morris Army Airfield ...................................................................................157 Wheeler Drive .............................................................................................157 SOURCES .............................................................................................................159 Archival Records .............................................................................................159 Print Sources ..................................................................................................161 Electronic Sources ...........................................................................................162 Interviews and Correspondence .....................................................................165 5 6 Figure 1.0 Fort Gillem location map............................................................................................................................10 Figure 1.1 Installation name changes and dates. .......................................................................................................15 Figure 2.0 Downtown Atlanta, 2012. .........................................................................................................................20 Figure 2.1 Fort Gillem entrance, 2012. .......................................................................................................................21 Figure 2.2 1864 map of Atlanta General Depot ..........................................................................................................22 Figure 2.3 Modern map of the installation. ...............................................................................................................24 Figure 3.0 Loading supplies at
Recommended publications
  • Third Army: Directing Traffic at the Crossroads of Two Wars
    Responsible Iraq Drawdown— Rapid Afghanistan Buildup Third Army: Directing Traffic At the Crossroads of Two Wars ach morning, shortly after sunrise and following the last strains of “Reveille,” the theme song from the movie “Patton” echoes across Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, harkening back to Third Army’s iconic leader and World War II heritage. The camp is home to Third Army’s E forward headquarters, and it is the sustainment nexus for America’s combat efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Third Army simultaneously is orchestrating the Iraq drawdown and rein- forcement of the war in Afghanistan while supporting and supplying the 18 ARMY I February 2010 Text and Photographs By Dennis Steele Senior Staff Writer First-generation mine resistant am- bush protected (MRAP) vehicles withdrawn from Iraq await shipment to Army training centers at a Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, holding yard. February 2010 I ARMY 19 Soldiers from the 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) go through a final round of training at a Third Army facility in Kuwait before heading into Iraq. day-to-day operations of both. The scale and complexity of Third Army’s sustainment operation is astronomical. If U.S. military personnel deployed to Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom eat it, shoot it, drive it, sleep in it or draw electrical power from it, Third Army/U.S. Army Central had a role in getting it to them, along with thousands of other items and re- pair parts needed for combat. The pace is unrelenting—in Afghanistan, it is ac- celerating—and the stakes are always high. To bolster U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Economic Effects of Military Base Closures: Three Cases
    Tracking the Economic Effects of Military Base Closures: Three Cases Christopher Preble* Abstract In October 2017, Secretary of Defense James Mattis urged Congress to grant him authority to reduce the department’s overhead. Even if the military were to grow back to the levels seen when the United States was actively fighting wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq (in 2012), the DoD had concluded that it would still be carrying nearly 20 percent excess base capacity. Congress, however, refused to grant Mattis’s request – just as it had rejected similar pleas from four previous Secretaries of Defense. Instead, the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) included language requiring DoD to complete another infrastructure review, effectively delaying any possible future round of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) until 2021, at the earliest. Congressional leaders have denied DoD the authority to close unneeded bases, in part, due to concern that such actions would do irreparable harm to local economies – and despite that fact that empirical studies show that most areas do eventually recover lost jobs after a nearby base closes. This paper will go beyond the numbers to explore how three communities have adapted to military base closures – Pease Air Force Base in Portsmouth, New Hampshire; Fort Ord in Northern California; and Forts McPherson and Gillem in and near Atlanta, Georgia. * Christopher Preble is vice president for defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute. The author wishes to thank Jonathan (J.E.) Allen for his assistance with the research and writing of this paper, and James Knupp for research help.
    [Show full text]
  • MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-09-2 Volume 35 Number 2 April - June 2009
    MIPB April - June 2009 PB 34-O9-2 Operations in OEF Afghanistan FROM THE EDITOR In this issue, three articles offer perspectives on operations in Afghanistan. Captain Nenchek dis- cusses the philosophy of the evolving insurgent “syndicates,” who are working together to resist the changes and ideas the Coalition Forces bring to Afghanistan. Captain Beall relates his experiences in employing Human Intelligence Collection Teams at the company level in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Lieutenant Colonel Lawson provides a look into the balancing act U.S. Army chaplains as non-com- batants in Afghanistan are involved in with regards to Information Operations. Colonel Reyes discusses his experiences as the MNF-I C2 CIOC Chief, detailing the problems and solutions to streamlining the intelligence effort. First Lieutenant Winwood relates her experiences in integrating intelligence support into psychological operations. From a doctrinal standpoint, Lieutenant Colonels McDonough and Conway review the evolution of priority intelligence requirements from a combined operations/intelligence view. Mr. Jack Kem dis- cusses the constructs of assessment during operations–measures of effectiveness and measures of per- formance, common discussion threads in several articles in this issue. George Van Otten sheds light on a little known issue on our southern border, that of the illegal im- migration and smuggling activities which use the Tohono O’odham Reservation as a corridor and offers some solutions for combined agency involvement and training to stem the flow. Included in this issue is nomination information for the CSM Doug Russell Award as well as a biogra- phy of the 2009 winner. Our website is at https://icon.army.mil/ If your unit or agency would like to receive MIPB at no cost, please email [email protected] and include a physical address and quantity desired or call the Editor at 520.5358.0956/DSN 879.0956.
    [Show full text]
  • The Field Artillery Journal Vol
    No. 6, November-December, 1931 A Very Modern Piece of Heavy Field Artillery—The 155mm Gun— 8-inch Howitzer ...................................................................Frontispiece The Annual Report of the Chief of Field Artillery ................................. 577 General Braxton Bragg............................................................................. 600 Lieut. R. T. Bennison, F. A., D. O. L. General Lassiter Retires............................................................................ 612 Field Artillery R. O. T. C. at Oregon State College................................ 615 Major F. W. Bowley, F. A. Type Problems ........................................................................................... 622 Heavy Artillery vs. Rockets ...................................................................... 625 Captain M. A. Stuart, F. A. An Auxiliary Range Disk for Use With 37mm Sub-Caliber Tubes on 75mm Gun, Model of 1897 (French) ................................................ 641 Major J. E. Lewis, F. A. The Field Artillery Pistol Team, 1931...................................................... 646 Foreign Military Journals: A Current Resume ...................................... 647 Field Line Construction ............................................................................ 655 Major W. P. Evans, Signal Corps Old Post Chapel at Fort Sill...................................................................... 659 Chaplain Milton O. Beebe, U. S. Army 155mm Gun—8-inch Howitzer (Illustrations) .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (Excerpt)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 16, 1982 East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt) Citation: “East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt),” December 16, 1982, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, BStU, Berlin, ZA, HVA, 19, pp. 126-359. Translated from German by Bernd Schaefer; available in original language at the Parallel History Project. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112680 Summary: The Stasi's own preface to the V Corps/U.S. Army 1981 war plan (which recognizes that NATO's concept was defensive in nature in contrast to Warsaw Pact plans, which until 1987 indeed envisioned the mentioned "breakthrough towards the Rhine") Original Language: German Contents: English Translation MINISTRY FOR STATE SECURITY Top Secret! Berlin, 16. Dec 1982 Only for personal use! Nr. 626/82 Return is requested! Expl. 5. Bl. MY Information about Military planning of the USA and NATO for the operation of the V. Army Corps/USA in times of tension and in war Part 1 Preliminary Remarks Through reliable intelligence we received portions of the US and NATO military crisis and wartime planning for the deployment of the V Corps/USA stationed in the FRG. This intelligence concerns the secret Operations Plan 33001 (GDP – General Defense Plan) for the V Corps/USA in Europe. The plan is endorsed by the US Department of the Army and, after consultation with NATO, became part of NATO planning.
    [Show full text]
  • General Lesley J. Mcnair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S
    General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army By [Copyright 2012] Mark T. Calhoun Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson ________________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann ________________________________ Dr. Christopher R. Gabel ________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey P. Moran ________________________________ Dr. Brent J. Steele Date Defended: April 6, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Mark T. Calhoun certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson Date approved: April 6, 2012 ii ABSTRACT General Lesley J. McNair demonstrated an innovative spirit and exceptional intellectual capacity in his efforts to organize and train the U.S. Army for World War II. The influence he exerted on Army doctrine, training, equipment development, unit organization, and combined arms fighting methods placed him among the handful of generals most responsible for both the effectiveness and the flaws of the force that the United States sent to war in 1942. Through his strong views and aggressive leadership, McNair played a key role in guiding the Army’s interwar mechanization and doctrinal development efforts. Many studies of this period have described aspects of his participation in that process. However, no comprehensive study of McNair’s forty-year military career exists, largely because he did not survive the war, and he left behind no personal memoirs or diaries when he died of wounds inflicted by errant American bombs in Normandy on July 25, 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, June
    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT of the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York June 10, 1941 C-rinted by The Moore Printing Company, Inc. Newburgh, N. Y¥: 0 C; 42 lcc0 0 0 0 P-,.0 r- 'Sc) CD 0 ct e c; *e H, Ir Annual Report, June 10, 1941 3 Report of the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Graduates, U. S. M. A. Held at West Point, N. Y., June 10, 1941 1. The meeting was called to order at 2:02 p. m. by McCoy '97, President of the Association. There were 225 present. 2. Invocation was rendered by the Reverend H. Fairfield Butt, III, Chaplain of the United States Military Academy. 3. The President presented Brigadier General Robert L. Eichel- berger, '09, Superintendent, U. S. Military Academy, who addressed the Association (Appendix B). 4. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the report of the President be dispensed with, since that Report would later be pub- lished in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix A). The motion was passed. 5. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the Report of the Secretary be dispensed with, since that Report would later be pub- lished in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix C.) The motion was passed. 6. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the Report of the Treasurer be dispensed with, since that Report would later be published in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix D).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Use of U.S. Military Bases to House Immigrants and Refugees
    CRS INSIGHT History of Use of U.S. Military Bases to House Immigrants and Refugees July 26, 2018 (IN10937) | Related Authors Lawrence Kapp Barbara Salazar Torreon | Lawrence Kapp, Specialist in Military Manpower Policy ([email protected], 7-7609) Barbara Salazar Torreon, Senior Research Librarian ([email protected], 7-8996) Background On June 20, 2018, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order that states "It is also the policy of this Administration to maintain family unity, including by detaining alien families together where appropriate and consistent with law and available resources" and that directs the Secretary of Defense to "take all legally available measures to provide to the Secretary [of Homeland Security], upon request, any existing facilities available for the housing and care of alien families, and shall construct such facilities if necessary and consistent with law." On June 24, Secretary of Defense James Mattis confirmed that Goodfellow Air Force Base and Fort Bliss, both in Texas, would be used to "provide whatever support the Department of Homeland Security needs to house the people that they have under their custody." Statutory Authority and Policy Documents Statutes that authorize the Department of Defense to provide support other federal agencies include: Section 1535 of Title 31 (the "Economy Act"), which authorizes an agency to place an order with another agency to obtain supplies or services from that agency. Chapter 15 of Title 10, governing military support for civilian law enforcement agencies, and particularly 10 U.S.C. 272, which authorizes the Secretary of Defense to make DOD equipment and facilities available to federal, state and local law enforcement officials for law enforcement purposes .
    [Show full text]
  • 94 Stat. 1782 Public Law 96-418—Oct
    PUBLIC LAW 96-418—OCT. 10, 1980 94 STAT. 1749 Public Law 96-418 96th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1981, and Oct. 10, 1980 for other purposes. [H.R. 7301] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be Military cited as the "MiUtary Construction Authorization Act, 1981". Au'thSdon Act, 1981. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment, for the following acquisition and construc­ tion: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $16,350,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $14,200,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $129,960,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $1,000,000. Fort Drum, New York, $5,900,000. Fort Gillem, Georgia, $2,600,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $24,420,000. Fort Hunter-Liggett, California, $5,100,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $16,000,000. Fort Ord, California, $4,700,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $14,800,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $890,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $3,750,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field, Georgia, $31,700,000. Presidio of San Francisco, California, $750,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $12,220,000. Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, $84,500,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort A.
    [Show full text]
  • Wofford Today
    VOLUME 50 | ISSUE 1 | FALL 2017 WOFFORDTODAY Excellence, engagement and transformation from the ground up WOFFORD TODAY MESSAGE from the PRESIDENT Fall 2017 | Volume 50 | Issue 1 wofford.edu/woffordtoday In the Class of 2021 EDITOR are future teachers, Jo Ann Mitchell Brasington ’89 attorneys, physicians, DESIGNER entrepreneurs, Michelle Griggs accountants, scientists, CONTRIBUTING WRITERS clergy, musicians, Kelsey Aylor ’18 interior designers, Laura Hendrix Corbin historians, architects … Ryann Kroske McCall ’13 Annie S. Mitchell the list goes on and on. I Dr. Phillip Stone ’94 don’t know where the Class of 2021 will end up in four PHOTOGRAPHER years, but I’m positive that Mark Olencki ’75 they will be prepared! COORDINATOR OF WEB CONTENT That’s what Wofford College does. It offers students Craig Sudduth ’09 opportunities to prepare for their first (or fifth) job. In the pages of this Wofford Today, you’ll find the stories of graduates who Wofford Today (USPS 691-140) is published four times have taken their Wofford foundation and upon it built — or are each year by the Office of Marketing and Communications, building — careers in the military. They all say that Wofford’s Wofford College, 429 N. Church St., Spartanburg, S.C. 29303-3663, for alumni and friends of the college. Issued liberal arts education helped them prepare to serve and lead quarterly: fall, winter, spring and summer. under often unexpected and demanding circumstances, and for Periodicals postage is paid at the Spartanburg Main Post that we are all grateful … but not surprised. Office, Spartanburg, S.C., with additional mailing entries in Columbia and Greenville.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Sergeant Brian Lewis Upon His
    Regular Session, 2006 ENROLLED SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 7 BY SENATORS HINES, ADLEY, AMEDEE, BAJOIE, BARHAM, BOASSO, BROOME, CAIN, CHAISSON, CHEEK, CRAVINS, DARDENNE, DUPLESSIS, DUPRE, ELLINGTON, FIELDS, FONTENOT, B. GAUTREAUX, N. GAUTREAUX, HEITMEIER, HOLLIS, JACKSON, JONES, KOSTELKA, LENTINI, MALONE, MARIONNEAUX, MCPHERSON, MICHOT, MOUNT, MURRAY, NEVERS, QUINN, ROMERO, SCHEDLER, SHEPHERD, SMITH, THEUNISSEN AND ULLO A RESOLUTION To express the sincere and heartfelt condolences of the Senate of the Legislature of Louisiana to the family of United States Army Staff Sergeant Brian Lewis upon his death in ground combat action during Operation Iraqi Freedom. WHEREAS, Staff Sergeant Lewis was a native of Melbourne, Florida, and moved to Louisiana when his parents relocated and Staff Sergeant Lewis began attending Bunkie Elementary School, ultimately graduating from Bunkie High School in 1991; and WHEREAS, Staff Sergeant Lewis entered the United States Army in 1993 and began his training at Fort Leonardwood, Missouri, fully intending to remain in the Army and make the military his chosen profession; and WHEREAS, Staff Sergeant Lewis had great success in the military, training hard and with much dedication to become an outstanding military policeman, and after completing the rigorous school, he was assigned to the 258th Military Police Company, 519 Military Police Battalion, Warrior Brigade; and WHEREAS, Staff Sergeant Lewis was a leader of the highest caliber and as a result was given challenging, difficult duties with his unit where he served as
    [Show full text]