DOCSLIB.ORG

Civilian Space Policy and Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civilian Space Policy and Applications Civilian Space Policy and Applications June 1982 NTIS order #PB82-234444 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 82-600564 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 . Foreword This assessment responds to a request to the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) from the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for an evaluation of the present state and possible future directions of space applications technologies in the civilian sector. Four technologies are examined in detail: satellite communications, land remote sensing, materials processing in space, and space transportation. In addition, the assessment investigates the national policy that has guided the development of these and other applications technologies. For the past quarter century, the United States has been the acknowledged world leader in the exploration of space and the use of technologies developed to operate in the space environment. Now, however, the United States faces increasing foreign competition in many areas of the space program, particularly in applications with commercial promise. Civilian Space Policy and Applications examines several means for addressing this competitive challenge. In particular, it investigates the options available for the future deployment of U.S. land remote-sensing systems, and explores the status of advanced satellite communications research within the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Further, the report assesses the potential for manufacturing useful products in space and for commercializing space transportation systems. OTA was greatly aided by the advice of the project advisory panel, as well as by participants in several specialized workshops. The contributions of contractors, who provided important analyses, and of numerous individuals and organizations that gave generously of their time and knowledge, are gratefully appreciated. Director .,. Ill .—— . — . — Civilian Space Policy and Applications Advisory Panel Jerry Grey, Chairman American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Fred E. Bradley Michael B. McElroy McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. Center for Earth and Planetary Physics Sam Brown Harvard University Private Consultant James A. Michener John G. Burke Author Department of History Bernard J. O’Keefe University of California EG&G, Inc. Hal Clement (Harry Stubbs) Thomas O. Paine Author Northrop Corp. Terry Dawson, Jr. Merton J. Peck The Analytic Sciences Corp. Department of Economics Hugh Downs Yale University American Broadcasting Co. Charles Sheldon * Daniel J. Fink Science Policy Research Division General Electric Co. Congressional Research Service Arnold Frutkin Marcia Smith The Burroughs Corp. Science Policy Research Division “ Congressional Research Service Eilene Galloway International Institute of Space Law of the Martin Summerfield Princeton Combustion Research Laboratories, Inc. Ivan Getting Verner E. Suomi Consultant Space Science & Engineering Center University of Wisconsin Willis M. Hawkins . Lockheed Corp. Anthony F. C. Wallace Department of Anthropology Ida R. Hoos University of Pennsylvania Space Sciences Laboratory University of California Roy A. Welch Department of Geography James A. Loveli University of Georgia Fisk Telephone Systems, Inc. NOTE: The Advisory Panel provided advice and comment throughout the assessment, but the members do not necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse the report for which OTA assumes full responsibility. * Deceased, iv Civilian Space Policy and Applications Project Staff John Andelin, Assistant Director OTA Science, Information, and Natural Resources Division Ray A. Williamson, Project Director Adam Wasserman Philip P. Chandler, II Richard DalBello* Gordon Law Richard Marsten** Thomas Thornberg*** Contributors Scott Finer Donna Valtri Administrative Staff paula Walden Jannie Coles Marion Fitzhugh Jean G. Monroe Contractors Trudy Bell Leonard David Russell Drew Rowland lnlow John Logsdon Thomas Potts Edward Risley OTA Publishing Staff John C. Holmes, Publishing Officer John Bergling Kathie S. Boss Debra M. Datcher Joe Henson ● In-house contractor ● ● project Director until March 1981. ***On detail from NASA (Septem!xr 1980 September 1981) Workshop on Policy Alternatives Jerry Grey, Chairman John Logsdon Robert Shaw American Institute of Aeronautics Technoscience Associates Exxon Enterprises and Astronautics Arthur Morrissey Jerome Simonoff Russell Drew Office of Science and Technology Citibank Science and Technology Consultants Policy David Williamson Executive Office of the President Louis Friedman NASA Headquarters Planetary Society Willis Shapley Private Consultant Ronald Konkel Planning Offices National Bureau of Standards Workshop on Commercialization of Land Remote Sensing Ralph Bernstein Robert Greenberg Charles Sheffield IBM Scientific Center Private Consultant Earth Satellite Corp. Dennis Burnett Leonard Jaffe Don Walklet COMSAT Computer Sciences Corp. Terra-Mar Associates Charles Dannaman Vladimir Naleskewicz R. Gordon Williams Space Operations Group Satellite Systems Engineering TRW Electronics and Defense General Electric Co. David Ferguson Information Systems and Services Workshop Materials Processing in Space Darrell Branscome Charles Fritts John Logsdon Committee on Science and National Productivity Group Graduate Program in Science, Technology U.S. General Accountimz Office Technology, and Public Policy U.S. House-of Representatives Laurence Gilchrist George Washington University Joseph E. Coleman Space Applications Board Louis Testardi McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. National Research Council Material Processing in Space Divison David Cummings James A. Kirk National Aeronautics and Space Universities Space Research Department of Mechanical Administration Associations Engineering Donald Edgecombe The University of Maryland Battelle Columbus Laboratories Workshop on International Issues in Commercial Space Systems Jean-Pierre Fouquet Ryo Kimura Wilfred Mellors Scientific Attache for S~ace Affairs International Space Division European Space Agency o Science & Technology Embassy of France Kenneth Pederson Agency Embassy of Japan Tadahico Inada International Affairs NASDA Representative Sebastian Lasher NASA Headquarters Embassy of Japan INTELSAT Workshop on Space Transportation Issues W. C. Armstrong Gilbert Keyes Robert White Northrop Services, Inc. Boeing Aerospace Co. General Dynamics Corp. William French Gilbert Moore James Wilson United Technology Corp. Thiokol Corp. McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co, Chuck Gould Morgan Sanborn Kenneth Zitek Rockwell International Corp. Rockwell International Corp. Martin Marietta Aerospace Corp. Don Ingram Charles Tringali Grumman Aerospace Corp. Lockheed Corp. vi Workshop on Remote Sensing: Government User Concerns Wolf Drews Charles parrish Edward Risley World Bank Earth Resources Data Analysis Department of the Interior Roland Inlow Charles Paul William Wigton OAO Agency for International Department of Agriculture Development Ahmed Meer Richard Williams Department of State Irv Pikus U.S. Geological Survey National Science Foundation James Nycum U.S. Genera! Accounting Office Bruce Rado Georgia State Department of National Resources Acknowledge ments OTA thanks the following people who took time to provide information or to review part or all of the study. john Alic S. E. James William Raney Office of Technology Assessment FSD Houston NASA Headquarters IBM Corp. john Benson Edward Risley Private Consultant David Johnson U.S. Geological Survey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Department of the Interior Marjorie Blumenthal Administration Office of Technology Assessment A. Schnapf D. J. Jones, Jr. RCA Astroelectronics Division Harvey Brooks General Dynamic Convair Division RCA Corp. Harvard University Systems Development Corp. Willis Shapley j. R. Burnett Thomas Karas Private Consultant Defense Systems Group Private Consultant TWR, Inc. peter Sharfman G. W. Keyes Office of Technology Assessment R. P. Buschmann Boeing Aerospace Co. Lockheed Corp. Michael Simon R. L. Kline National Aeronautics and Space Joseph Coleman Grumman Aerospace Corp. Administration McDonnell Douglas Astronautics CO. Sebastian Lasher Delbert Smith William Colglazier INTELSAT COMSAT Harvard University Pamela Mack Norman Terrell Burt CowIan Private Consultant Arms Control and Disarmament Private Consultant Agency Joseph Mahon Kenneth Craib National Aeronautics and Space Louis Testardi Resource Development Corp. Administration Materials Processing in Space Ray Crowe!! Division M. J. Maltagliati Office of Technology Assessment National Aeronautics and Space Aerospace Industries Association of Administration Jean Pierre Fouquet America, Inc. French Embassy P. S. Visher Wilfred Mellors Hughes Aircraft Co. J. L. Gait European Space Agency International and Business Affairs M. 1. Yarymoych Arthur Morrisey Planning North American Aerospace Martin Marietta Aerospace Corp. General Electric Co. Operations Charles Parrish Rockwell International Corp. G. J. Gleghorn The Naisbett Group TRW DSSG Charles Yost Kenneth Pederson National Aeronautics and Space Noel Hinners International Affairs Administration National Air & Space Museum NASA Headquarters S. L. Zieberg Roland Inlow R. A. Pepping Martin Marietta Aerospace Corp. OAO McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co Tadahiko lnada Ian Pryke NASDA Representative European Space Agency Embassy of Japan VII Contents Chapter Page 1. Executive Summary . 3 2. Introduction . 21 3. issues and Findings . 27 4. Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPEAKERS TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE 15TH ANNUAL John R
    15TH ANNUAL FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE SPEAKERS COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION http://www.faa.gov/go/ast 15-16 FEBRUARY 2012 HQ-12-0163.INDD John R. Allen Christine Anderson Dr. John R. Allen serves as the Program Executive for Crew Health Christine Anderson is the Executive Director of the New Mexico and Safety at NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, where he Spaceport Authority. She is responsible for the development oversees the space medicine activities conducted at the Johnson and operation of the first purpose-built commercial spaceport-- Space Center, Houston, Texas. Dr. Allen received a B.A. in Speech Spaceport America. She is a recently retired Air Force civilian Communication from the University of Maryland (1975), a M.A. with 30 years service. She was a member of the Senior Executive in Audiology/Speech Pathology from The Catholic University Service, the civilian equivalent of the military rank of General of America (1977), and a Ph.D. in Audiology and Bioacoustics officer. Anderson was the founding Director of the Space from Baylor College of Medicine (1996). Upon completion of Vehicles Directorate at the Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland his Master’s degree, he worked for the Easter Seals Treatment Air Force Base, New Mexico. She also served as the Director Center in Rockville, Maryland as an audiologist and speech- of the Space Technology Directorate at the Air Force Phillips language pathologist and received certification in both areas. Laboratory at Kirtland, and as the Director of the Military Satellite He joined the US Air Force in 1980, serving as Chief, Audiology Communications Joint Program Office at the Air Force Space at Andrews AFB, Maryland, and at the Wiesbaden Medical and Missile Systems Center in Los Angeles where she directed Center, Germany, and as Chief, Otolaryngology Services at the the development, acquisition and execution of a $50 billion Aeromedical Consultation Service, Brooks AFB, Texas, where portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Space Demand No 94 1
    Department of Space Demand No 94 1. Space Technology (CS) FINANCIAL OUTLAY (Rs OUTPUTS 2020-21 OUTCOME 2020-21 in Cr) Targets Targets 2020-21 Output Indicators Outcome Indicators 2020-21 2020-21 1. Research & 1.1 No. of Earth 05 1. Augmentation of Space 1.1 Introduction of 01 Developmen Observation (EO) Infrastructure for Ocean Colour t, design of spacecrafts ready for providing continuity of Monitor with technologies launch EO Services with 13 spectral and improved capabilities bands realization 1.2 Number of Launches of 05 1.2 Sea surface 01 of space Polar Satellite Launch temperature systems for Vehicle(PSLV) sensor launch 1.3 Number of Launches of 01 1.3 Continuation 01 vehicles and Geosynchronous Satellite of Microwave spacecrafts. Launch Vehicle - GSLV Imaging in C- Mk-III band. 1.4 Number of Launches of 02 2. Ensuring operational 2.1 No. of 05 9761.50 Geosynchronous Satellite launch services for Indigenous Launch Vehicle -GSLV domestic and commercial launches using Operational Flights Satellites. PSLV. 3. Self-sufficiency in 3.1 Operational 01 launching 4 Tone class of launches of communication satellites GSLV Mk III into Geo-synchronous transfer orbit. 4. Self-sufficiency in 4.1 No of 02 launching 2.5 - 3 Tone indigenous class of Communication launches using Satellites into Geo- GSLV. synchronous Transfer Orbit. 2. Space Applications (CS) FINANCIAL OUTLAY (Rs OUTPUTS 2020-21 OUTCOME 2020-21 in Cr) Targets Targets 2020-21 Output Indicators Outcome Indicators 2020-21 2020-21 1. Design & 1.1 No. of EO/ Communication 11 1. Information on optimal 1.1 Availability of 07 Develop Payloads realized management of natural advanced sensors to ment of 1.2 Information support for major 85% resource, natural provide space based Applicati disaster events (as %ge of Total disasters, agricultural information with ons for events occurred) planning, infrastructure improved capability 1810.00 EO, 1.3 No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tubesat Launch Vehicle
    TubeSat and NEPTUNE 30 Orbital Rocket Programs Personal Satellites Are GO! Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com About Interorbital Corporation Founded in 1996 by Randa and Roderick Milliron, incorporated in 2001 Located at the Mojave Spaceport in Mojave, California 98.5% owned by R. and R. Milliron 1.5% owned by Eric Gullichsen Initial Starting Technology Pressure-fed liquid rocket engines Initial Mission Low-cost orbital and interplanetary launch vehicle development Facilities 6,000 square-foot research and development facility Two rocket engine test sites at the Mojave Spaceport Expert engineering and manufacturing team Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Core Technical Team Roderick Milliron: Chief Designer Lutz Kayser: Primary Technical Consultant Eric Gullichsen: Guidance and Control Gerard Auvray: Telecommunications Engineer Donald P. Bennett: Mechanical Engineer David Silsbee: Electronics Engineer Joel Kegel: Manufacturing/Engineering Tech Jacqueline Wein: Manufacturing/Engineering Tech Reinhold Ziegler: Space-Based Power Systems E. Mark Shusterman,M.D. Medical Life Support Randa Milliron: High-Temperature Composites Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Key Hardware Built In-House Propellant Tanks: Combining state-of-the-art composite technology with off-the-shelf aluminum liners Advanced Guidance Hardware and Software Ablative Rocket Engines and Components GPRE 0.5KNFA Rocket Engine Test Manned Space Flight Training Systems Rocket Injectors, Valves Systems, and Other Metal components Interorbital Systems www.interorbital.com Project History Pressure-Fed Rocket Engines GPRE 2.5KLMA Liquid Oxygen/Methanol Engine: Thrust = 2,500 lbs. GPRE 0.5KNFA WFNA/Furfuryl Alcohol (hypergolic): Thrust = 500 lbs. GPRE 0.5KNHXA WFNA/Turpentine (hypergolic): Thrust = 500 lbs. GPRE 3.0KNFA WFNA/Furfuryl Alcohol (hypergolic): Thrust = 3,000 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Streng Geheim? Seit 28 Jahren Vorstandsmitglied Des GHK
    Von Dr. Ferdinand Stegbauer Streng geheim? seit 28 Jahren Vorstandsmitglied des GHK sen wurde, ist OTRAG mit dem Hauptsitz ab 1981 in Münschen weiter. Die OTRAG Neu-Isenburg, Herzogstraße 61, urkund- wurde 1986 von Gesellschaftern liqui- lich erfasst. diert, wobei die OTRAG-Aktionäre Millio- nenverluste erlitten. Lutz T. Kayser ging OTRAG gründete zunächst das Subun- nach seinem Aufenthalt in Libyen in die ternehmen Stewering-OTRAG und USA, beruhigte die CIA und beteiligte baute einen eigenen Flughafen in Zaire. sich an verschiedenen Raumfahrtfirmen. Es folgte die ORAS (Otrag Range Air Ser- Im Jahr 2007 zog Lutz T. Kayser auf eine vice), die zwei Hawker Siddeley-›Argosy‹- Marshallinsel und starb am 19.11.2017 Transportmaschinen für den Transport auf Bikendrik Island, einer Insel zwischen von Material- und Raketenteilen kaufte. Neueste Quizfrage: »Welche Rakete Neu-Seeland und Hawaii. Ihn erreichte Die beiden Flugzeuge pendelten zwi- trägt den Namen des weltweit ersten pri- kein politisches Gewitter mehr. vaten Raumfahrtunternehmens mit Sitz schen München-Riem und dem von in Neu-Isenburg?« Die richtige Antwort OTRAG errichteten Airport ›Luvua‹ (Flie- Der Regisseur Oliver Schwehm recher- lautet ›OTRAG-Rakete‹! – Hätten Sie’s gercode). Am 17.5.1977 gab es den ers- chierte seit 2014 zu OTRAG, schrieb ein gewusst? – Vermutlich nicht, obwohl ten Start einer OTRAG-Rakete in Zaire, Drehbuch und führte Regie für seinen OTRAG nie geheim war. Natürlich umgab natürlich mit dem Hoheitszeichen von Film ›Fly Rocket Fly‹ unter Einbeziehung sich OTRAG auch mit Geheimnissen, die Zaire. Am 20.5.1978 erfolgte der Start von originalen OTRAG-Filmdokumenten. nach und nach enthüllt wurden. von OTRAG 2 ebenfalls mit dem Hoheits- Ab dem 27.9.2018 lief ›Fly Rocket Fly‹ in zeichen von Zaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 6-2013 The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress Andrew Follett College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Follett, Andrew, "The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress" (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 584. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/584 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Government from The College of William and Mary by Andrew Follett Accepted for . John Gilmour, Director . Sophia Hart . Rowan Lockwood Williamsburg, VA May 3, 2013 1 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Part 1: Introduction and Background 4 Pre Soviet Collapse: Early American Failures in Space 13 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Successful Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo Programs 17 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Quasi-Successful Shuttle Program 22 Part 2: The Thin Years, Repeated Failure in NASA in the Post-Soviet Era 27 The Failure of the Space Exploration Initiative 28 The Failed Vision for Space Exploration 30 The Success of Unmanned Space Flight 32 Part 3: Why NASA Fails 37 Part 4: Putting this to the Test 87 Part 5: Changing the Method.
    [Show full text]
  • India and China Space Programs: from Genesis of Space Technologies to Major Space Programs and What That Means for the Internati
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2009 India And China Space Programs: From Genesis Of Space Technologies To Major Space Programs And What That Means For The Internati Gaurav Bhola University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Bhola, Gaurav, "India And China Space Programs: From Genesis Of Space Technologies To Major Space Programs And What That Means For The Internati" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4109. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4109 INDIA AND CHINA SPACE PROGRAMS: FROM GENESIS OF SPACE TECHNOLOGIES TO MAJOR SPACE PROGRAMS AND WHAT THAT MEANS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY by GAURAV BHOLA B.S. University of Central Florida, 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2009 Major Professor: Roger Handberg © 2009 Gaurav Bhola ii ABSTRACT The Indian and Chinese space programs have evolved into technologically advanced vehicles of national prestige and international competition for developed nations. The programs continue to evolve with impetus that India and China will have the same space capabilities as the United States with in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 - 2018 Annual Report 2017 - 2018 Citizens’ Charter of Department of Space
    GSAT-17 Satellites Images icro M sat ries Satellit Se e -2 at s to r a C 0 SAT-1 4 G 9 -C V L S P III-D1 -Mk LV GS INS -1 C Asia Satell uth ite o (G S S A T - 09 9 LV-F ) GS ries Sat Se ellit t-2 e sa to 8 r -C3 a LV C PS Annual Report 2017 - 2018 Annual Report 2017 - 2018 Citizens’ Charter of Department Of Space Department Of Space (DOS) has the primary responsibility of promoting the development of space science, technology and applications towards achieving self-reliance and facilitating in all round development of the nation. With this basic objective, DOS has evolved the following programmes: • Indian National Satellite (INSAT) programme for telecommunication, television broadcasting, meteorology, developmental education, societal applications such as telemedicine, tele-education, tele-advisories and similar such services • Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) satellite programme for the management of natural resources and various developmental projects across the country using space based imagery • Indigenous capability for the design and development of satellite and associated technologies for communications, navigation, remote sensing and space sciences • Design and development of launch vehicles for access to space and orbiting INSAT / GSAT, IRS and IRNSS satellites and space science missions • Research and development in space sciences and technologies as well as application programmes for national development The Department Of Space is committed to: • Carrying out research and development in satellite and launch vehicle technology with a goal to achieve total self reliance • Provide national space infrastructure for telecommunications and broadcasting needs of the country • Provide satellite services required for weather forecasting, monitoring, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition
    Tf Freewheel simply a tour « // o é Z oon" ‘ , c AUS Figas - 3 8 tion = ~ Conds : 8O man | S. | —§R Transhu : QO the Great Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition Science Slightly Over the Edge ED REGIS A VV Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. - Reading, Massachusetts Menlo Park, California New York Don Mills, Ontario Wokingham, England Amsterdam Bonn Sydney Singapore Tokyo Madrid San Juan Paris Seoul Milan Mexico City Taipei Acknowledgmentof permissions granted to reprint previously published material appears on page 301. Manyofthe designations used by manufacturers andsellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book and Addison-Wesley was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in initial capital letters (e.g., Silly Putty). .Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Regis, Edward, 1944— Great mambo chicken and the transhuman condition : science slightly over the edge / Ed Regis. p- cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-201-09258-1 ISBN 0-201-56751-2 (pbk.) 1. Science—Miscellanea. 2. Engineering—Miscellanea. 3. Forecasting—Miscellanea. I. Title. Q173.R44 1990 500—dc20 90-382 CIP Copyright © 1990 by Ed Regis All rights reserved. No part ofthis publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Text design by Joyce C. Weston Set in 11-point Galliard by DEKR Corporation, Woburn, MA - 12345678 9-MW-9594939291 Second printing, October 1990 First paperback printing, August 1991 For William Patrick Contents The Mania..
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon John M
    Chapter Two Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon John M. Logsdon Project Apollo, the remarkable U.S. space effort that sent 12 astronauts to the surface of Earth’s Moon between July 1969 and December 1972, has been extensively chronicled and analyzed.1 This essay will not attempt to add to this extensive body of literature. Its ambition is much more modest: to provide a coherent narrative within which to place the various documents included in this compendium. In this narrative, key decisions along the path to the Moon will be given particular attention. 1. Roger Launius, in his essay “Interpreting the Moon Landings: Project Apollo and the Historians,” History and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3 (September 2006): 225–55, has provided a com­ prehensive and thoughtful overview of many of the books written about Apollo. The bibliography accompanying this essay includes almost every book-length study of Apollo and also lists a number of articles and essays interpreting the feat. Among the books Launius singles out for particular attention are: John M. Logsdon, The Decision to Go to the Moon: Project Apollo and the National Interest (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1970); Walter A. McDougall, . the Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age (New York: Basic Books, 1985); Vernon Van Dyke, Pride and Power: the Rationale of the Space Program (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1964); W. Henry Lambright, Powering Apollo: James E. Webb of NASA (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995); Roger E. Bilstein, Stages to Saturn: A Technological History of the Apollo/Saturn Launch Vehicles, NASA SP-4206 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1980); Edgar M.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted Signature of Author: History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology Affd Society August 19, 2014
    Project Apollo, Cold War Diplomacy and the American Framing of Global Interdependence by MASSACHUSETTS 5NS E. OF TECHNOLOGY OCT 0 6 201 Teasel Muir-Harmony LIBRARIES Bachelor of Arts St. John's College, 2004 Master of Arts University of Notre Dame, 2009 Submitted to the Program in Science, Technology, and Society In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2014 D 2014 Teasel Muir-Harmony. All Rights Reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature redacted Signature of Author: History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology affd Society August 19, 2014 Certified by: Signature redacted David A. Mindell Frances and David Dibner Professor of the History of Engineering and Manufacturing Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Committee Chair redacted Certified by: Signature David Kaiser C01?shausen Professor of the History of Science Director, Program in Science, Technology, and Society Senior Lecturer, Department of Physics Committee Member Signature redacted Certified by: Rosalind Williams Bern Dibner Professor of the History of Technology Committee Member Accepted by: Signature redacted Heather Paxson William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor, Anthropology Director of Graduate Studies, History, Anthropology, and STS Signature
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization of Space – the Astrosociological Approach
    AIAA SPACE 2007 Conference & Exposition AIAA 2007-6076 18 - 20 September 2007, Long Beach, California The Globalization of Space – The Astrosociological Approach Marilyn Dudley-Flores* and Thomas Gangale† OPS-Alaska, 2262 Magnolia Avenue, Petaluma, California 94952 USA [Abstract] The primary author coined the phrase “globalization of space” in the 1990s in lectures and presentations, thus the term was conceived in the sociological record. And, though texts and journal articles on sociology are full of studies of the phenomenon of globalization, sociologists are not serious about the study of those aerospatial events that made possible the extent of modern globalization. And, although it is in their purview, they do not keep track of advancements in the aerospace industry that can provide clues to where globalization is taking human societies. On the other hand, the “globalization of space” is referenced by a host of organizations connected to the aerospace community (i.e., NASA, the Air Force Academy, et al.). However, to the reverse of the sociological community, aerospace organizations have little concept of social factors at varying levels of analysis that can provide clues to where human societies are heading in space – a destination that will impact aerospace industries. The authors advocate for taking the astrosociological approach, a merging of social science and aerospace perspectives in order to examine the coming benefits and challenges to the globalization of space. Several topics, near-term to long-term, discussed in this report
    [Show full text]