DOCSLIB.ORG

Australian Advisory Council on Languages and Mar 90 Awareness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 355 757 FL 020 601 AUTHOR Riley-Mundine, Lynette; Roberts, Bryn TITLE Review of National Aboriginal Languages Program. Occasional Paper Number 5. INSTITUTION Australian Advisory Council on Languages and Multicultural Education, Canberra. PUB DATE Mar 90 NOTE 117p. PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Australian Aboriginal Languages; *Cultural Awareness; *Curriculum Development; Foreign Countries; *Indigenous Populations; Instructional Materials; Language Research; *Language Role; Material Development; National Programs; *Native Language Instruction; Policy Formation; Program Descriptions; Program Design; Program Evaluation; Program Implementation; Public Policy; Resource Allocation; Uncommonly Taught Languages IDENTIFIERS *Australia; National Aboriginal Languages Program (Australia) ABSTRACT This review of Australia's National Aboriginal Languages Program, undertaken in September-November 1989, involved consultation with individuals in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal organizations and communities in several areas. It was found that 56% of 1988-89 funding went to Aboriginal communities and regional language centers, 20% to state schools, 5% to independent aboriginal schools, 2% to Catholic schools, ani the remainder to institutions, private companies, and individuals. The program currently assists 91 Aboriginal languages, with over 5,000 people benefitting directly or indirectly. Achievements, still in the early stages at the time of the review, included educational and linguistic materials development, greater teacher recognition of student difficulties, increased student pride in language learning and community support for related projects, better student retention, greater opportunities for cross-cultural learning, and greater appreciation of Aboriginal language and culture. Problems included funding and resource allocation difficulties, staffing shortfalls, inadequate awareness and school administrative support in some cases, differential quality and quantity of materials developed, lack of appropriate public policy, and administrative Jrganization. Proposals are made for Aboriginal language policy, regional representation, additional regional language centers, funding, community involvement, curriculum development, staff training, and research. Program data and descriptions and notes on the study's methodology are appended. (MSE) *************************************4***************Y.***************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** A ACLAME Ar REVIEW OF NATIONAL ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES PROGRAM Lynette Riley - Mundine Bryn Roberts AACLAME OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 5 MARCH 1990 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Olt - or Educational Research and Improvement -PERMISSION TO REPRODUCETHIS EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTEDBY CENTER (ERIC) A106his document has been reproduced es received from the person or organization BEST COPY AVAILABLE originating et 0 Mmor changes have been made to improve 0 reproduction duality Points ot view or opinions stated in this doCu. merit do not ncesearily represent °those TO THE EDUCATIONALRESOURCES OE RI position or polity INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)... This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the AACLAME Secretariat, GPO Box 9880, Canberra, ACT, 2601 ISBN 0 642 15577 1 BEST COPYAVAILABLE .) A REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES PROGRAM BRYN ROBERTS AND LYNETTE RILEY-MUNDINE PITMAN ROBERTS AND PARTNERS, 1 MOUNT STREET,PERTH, W.A. MAY 1990 "Once upon a timepeoplewouldn'tadmit they were Aboriginal. NOW they stand up and shout they are." [Mr Andrew Pacey Gumbayngirr] "Foreigners are coming to our land and can speak their language. Why can't we speak ours?Because we've been taught to be ashamed of our language, our culture." [Mrs Shirley Foley Butchulla] REVIEW OF NATIONAL ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES PROGRAM FOREWORD TheNational AboriginalLanguages Program (NALP) is one of the programs fundedunderthe National Policy on Languages and on behalf of theAustralianAdvisoryCouncil on Languages and Multicultural Education (AACLAME) by the Department of Employment, Education and Training. Most cf these programs have beenreviewed and a report of these is available or will soon be issued. TheAustralian SecondLanguages LearningProgram (ASLLP) was reviewed by MrMossDixon andDr Anne Martin in early 1990. That report has been issued as Occasional Paper No 4. TheAdult Literacy Action Campaign was reviewed by Ernst & Young in late 1989 and is available from the International Literacy Year Secretariat (GPO Box 9880, Canberra ACT2601). AACLAME Occasional Papers also include: a) Occasional Paper No 1. Submissionto theMinister for Employment, Education and Training in response to the Green Paper on Higher Education. Submission to the Inquiry Into Asian Studies and Languages in Higher Education. AACLAMEDiscussion Paper on the possible creationof a National Institute of Languages. b) Occasional Paper No 2. Illiteracy in Melanesia: A Preliminary Report D T Tryon, ResearchSchool of Pacific Studies, AustralianNational University, 1988. c) Occasional Paper No 3. Adult Literacy Action Campaign: Projects Around Australia A review of state andterritory level adult literacy projects fundedunder the Adult Literacy Action Campaign of the National Policy on Languages. On 28 March, AACLAME held a review seminar to address the two years of work undertakento date under the National Policy on Languages. The findings of thispresent evaluationwere discussed andincorporated into theAACLAMEReport to the Minister. This will become available shortly. and informative I welcome this very detailed, comprehensive evaluation of NALP, commend the researchers forthe thorough way theyhave addressed their task and assureaboriginal communities and education personnel that these findings havebeen incorporatedinto AACLAME's forward planning andrecommendations to the Government. /444.0 JOSEPH LO BIANCO C ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The two principal reviewers would like to thank those people whohave giventheir timeto this review. These include the many community people, administrators, linguists, departmental officers, etc. consulted over the period of the review. A full list of places visited and people consulted is provided in the Appendix. We wouldalso like to thank Susan Guy, Researcher, of Pitman Roberts and Partners for tier commitment to the project. The Review was funded by the National Aboriginal Language Program. THE CONSULTANTS LYNETTE RILEY-MUNDINE Lynette Riley Mundine is Aboriginal Research Fellow andHead of the Aboriginal Resource Unit at the University of New England.She is a qualified teacher and is currently completing aMasters degree in Education.Lynette has a wide range of experience inthe Aboriginal and education areas including curriculum planning, resource evaluation, staff training and policydevelopment. She has co-written four books including "Black Australia" and"Colonial Australia" and haspresented and published numerous papers, including one on Aboriginal Language Maintenance. BRYN ROBERTS Bryn Roberts is a Partner at Pitman Roberts. He is aqualified teacher, has a Master of Arts degree and has recently completed his Doctorate in Education. Bryn has a wide range of experiencein the Aboriginal area which includes consultancy work inhealth, education, prisons, law, tourism, language, fashion, the arts and business. He has written numerous books and is the authorof "Aborigines in Business". He grew up in a bilingual bicultural environmentand taught in a bilingual school in Far North Queensland. 3 PREFACE This review of the National Aboriginal Languages Program (NALP) some two years after its inception has been requested by the Ministerfor Employment, Education and Training, theHonorable John Dawkins. Its purpose is to establish factors whichcontribute to the success or failure ofAboriginal language education projects funded throughNALP, with a view to incorporatingthese activities into the planning stages following the implementation of theNationalAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander EducationPolicy [AEP]. NALP is administered by the Department of Employment, Education and Training [DEET] which is reviewing all its Aboriginal programs as part of the current developments of the AEP. The review was conducted over an eightweekperiod in September/November 1989. 35 organisations and communities in Western Australia, SouthAustralia, Queensland, New SouthWales and the Northern Territory were visited. 176 community members, councillors, language workers, students, teachers, school principals, academics, linguists, administrators, public servants and five NALP Panel memberswere consulted. A draft report was submitted for comment in December 1989 andthe final report completed in January1990. A review of the final report was undertaken and completed in May 1990. CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1 . The National Policy on Languages . The Australian Advisory Council on Languages and Multicultural Education [AACLAME] 1 2 . The National Aboriginal Languages Program [NALP] 3 . AACLAME and NALP . The NationalAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Policy [AEP] 6 6 . The AEP and NALP CHAPTER 2. NALP'S ACHIEVEMENTS 8 9 . Distribution of Funds 11 . Number of Languages Assisted 11 . Number of People Assisted
Recommended publications
  • Aboriginal and Indigenous Languages; a Language Other Than English for All; and Equitable and Widespread Language Services

    Aboriginal and Indigenous Languages; a Language Other Than English for All; and Equitable and Widespread Language Services

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 355 819 FL 021 087 AUTHOR Lo Bianco, Joseph TITLE The National Policy on Languages, December 1987-March 1990. Report to the Minister for Employment, Education and Training. INSTITUTION Australian Advisory Council on Languages and Multicultural Education, Canberra. PUB DATE May 90 NOTE 152p. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Advisory Committees; Agency Role; *Educational Policy; English (Second Language); Foreign Countries; *Indigenous Populations; *Language Role; *National Programs; Program Evaluation; Program Implementation; *Public Policy; *Second Languages IDENTIFIERS *Australia ABSTRACT The report proviCes a detailed overview of implementation of the first stage of Australia's National Policy on Languages (NPL), evaluates the effectiveness of NPL programs, presents a case for NPL extension to a second term, and identifies directions and priorities for NPL program activity until the end of 1994-95. It is argued that the NPL is an essential element in the Australian government's commitment to economic growth, social justice, quality of life, and a constructive international role. Four principles frame the policy: English for all residents; support for Aboriginal and indigenous languages; a language other than English for all; and equitable and widespread language services. The report presents background information on development of the NPL, describes component programs, outlines the role of the Australian Advisory Council on Languages and Multicultural Education (AACLAME) in this and other areas of effort, reviews and evaluates NPL programs, and discusses directions and priorities for the future, including recommendations for development in each of the four principle areas. Additional notes on funding and activities of component programs and AACLAME and responses by state and commonwealth agencies with an interest in language policy issues to the report's recommendations are appended.
  • The Status of Degrees in Warlpiri

    The Status of Degrees in Warlpiri

    The status of degrees in Warlpiri Margit Bowler, UCLA Stanford Fieldwork Group: November 4, 2015 Stanford University Margit Bowler, UCLA The status of degrees in Warlpiri Roadmap Overview of Australian languages & my fieldwork site My methodologies for collecting degree data −! Methodological issues Background on degrees and degree constructions Presentation of Warlpiri data −! Degree data roughly following Beck, et al. (2009) −! Potentially problematic morphemes/constructions What can this tell us about: −! Degrees in Warlpiri? (They do not exist!) Wrap-up Margit Bowler, UCLA The status of degrees in Warlpiri Australian languages 250-300 languages were spoken when Australia was colonized in the late 1700s; ∼100 languages are spoken today (Dixon 2002) −! Of these, only approximately 20 languages have a robust speaker population; Warlpiri has 3,000 speakers Divided into Pama-Nyungan (90% of languages in Australia) versus non-Pama-Nyungan Margit Bowler, UCLA The status of degrees in Warlpiri Common features of Australian languages (Split-)ergativity −! Warlpiri has ergative case marking, roughly accusative agreement marking Highly flexible word order Extensive pro-drop Adjectives pattern morphosyntactically like nouns −! Host case marking, trigger agreement marking, and so on Margit Bowler, UCLA The status of degrees in Warlpiri Yuendumu, NT ∼300km northwest of Alice Springs, NT Population ∼800, around 90% Aboriginal 95% of children at the Yuendumu school speak Warlpiri as a first language Languages spoken include Warlpiri, Pintupi/Luritja,
  • On Numeral Complexity in Hunter-Gatherer Languages

    On Numeral Complexity in Hunter-Gatherer Languages

    On numeral complexity in hunter-gatherer languages PATIENCE EPPS, CLAIRE BOWERN, CYNTHIA A. HANSEN, JANE H. HILL, and JASON ZENTZ Abstract Numerals vary extensively across the world’s languages, ranging from no pre- cise numeral terms to practically infinite limits. Particularly of interest is the category of “small” or low-limit numeral systems; these are often associated with hunter-gatherer groups, but this connection has not yet been demonstrated by a systematic study. Here we present the results of a wide-scale survey of hunter-gatherer numerals. We compare these to agriculturalist languages in the same regions, and consider them against the broader typological backdrop of contemporary numeral systems in the world’s languages. We find that cor- relations with subsistence pattern are relatively weak, but that numeral trends are clearly areal. Keywords: borrowing, hunter-gatherers, linguistic area, number systems, nu- merals 1. Introduction Numerals are intriguing as a linguistic category: they are lexical elements on the one hand, but on the other they are effectively grammatical in that they may involve a generative system to derive higher values, and they interact with grammatical systems of quantification. Numeral systems are particularly note- worthy for their considerable crosslinguistic variation, such that languages may range from having no precise numeral terms at all to having systems whose limits are practically infinite. As Andersen (2005: 26) points out, numerals are thus a “liminal” linguistic category that is subject to cultural elaboration. Recent work has called attention to this variation among numeral systems, particularly with reference to systems having very low limits (for example, see Evans & Levinson 2009, D.
  • (Pristis Microdon) in the Fitzroy River Kimberley,, Westernn Australia

    (Pristis Microdon) in the Fitzroy River Kimberley,, Westernn Australia

    Biology and cultural significance of the freshwater sawfish (Pristis microdon) in the Fitzroy River Kimberley, Western Australia Report to 2004 A collaboration between Kimberley Language Resource Centre Cover Artwork: Competition winner, freshwater sawfish painting by Joy Nuggett (Mangkaja Arts, Fitzroy Crossing, Western Australia) Report by Dean Thorburn, David Morgan and Howard Gill from the Freshwater Fish Group at the Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research Mel Johnson, Hugh Wallace-Smith, Tom Vigilante, Ari Gorring, Ishmal Croft and Jean Fenton Land + Sea Unit Numerous language experts and people of the west Kimberley in conjunction with the Kimberley Language Resource Centre Our sincere gratitude is extended to the Threatened Species Network and World Wide Fund For Nature for providing the funds for this project. Fishcare WA and Environment Australia also made a substantial financial contribution to the project . 2 Project Summary During a collaborative study involving researchers and members from Murdoch University, the Kimberley Land Council, the Kimberley Language Resource Centre and numerous communities of the west Kimberley, a total of 79 endangered freshwater sawfish Pristis microdon were captured (and released) from King Sound and the Fitzroy, May and Robinson rivers between 2002 and 2004. Forty of these individuals were tagged. This culturally significant species, is not only an important food source, but is included in a number of stories and beliefs of the peoples of the Fitzroy River, where it is referred to as ‘galwanyi’ in Bunuba and Gooniyandi, ‘wirridanyniny’ or ‘pial pial’ in Nyikina, and ‘wirrdani’ in Walmajarri (see Chapter 2). In relation to the biology and ecology of the species (Chapter 1), of the 73 individuals sexed, 43 were female, ranging in length from 832 to 2770 mm TL, and 30 were male, ranging in length from 815 to 2350 mm TL.
  • Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal Languages South of the Kimberley Region

    Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal Languages South of the Kimberley Region

    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series C - 124 HANDBOOK OF WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES SOUTH OF THE KIMBERLEY REGION Nicholas Thieberger Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Thieberger, N. Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal languages south of the Kimberley Region. C-124, viii + 416 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1993. DOI:10.15144/PL-C124.cover ©1993 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. Pacific Linguistics is issued through the Linguistic Circle of Canberra and consists of four series: SERIES A: Occasional Papers SERIES c: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIES D: Special Publications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: T.E. Dutton, A.K. Pawley, M.D. Ross, D.T. Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W.Bender KA. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics DavidBradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Miihlhausler Monash University University of Adelaide S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. KJ. Franklin KL. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W.Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W.Grace Gillian Sankoff University of Hawaii University of Pennsylvania M.A.K Halliday W.A.L. Stokhof University of Sydney University of Leiden E. Haugen B.K T' sou Harvard University City Polytechnic of Hong Kong A. Healey E.M. Uhlenbeck Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Leiden L.A.
  • A Grammatical Sketch of Ngarla: a Language of Western Australia Torbjörn Westerlund

    A Grammatical Sketch of Ngarla: a Language of Western Australia Torbjörn Westerlund

    UPPSALA UNIVERSITY master thesis The department for linguistics and philology spring term 2007 A grammatical sketch of Ngarla: A language of Western Australia Torbjörn Westerlund Supervisor: Anju Saxena Abstract In this thesis the basic grammatical structure of normal speech style of the Western Australian language Ngarla is described using example sentences taken from the Ngarla – English Dictionary (by Geytenbeek; unpublished). No previous description of the language exists, and since there are only five people who still speak it, it is of utmost importance that it is investigated and described. The analysis in this thesis has been made by Torbjörn Westerlund, and the focus lies on the morphology of the nominal word class. The preliminary results show that the language shares many grammatical traits with other Australian languages, e.g. the ergative/absolutive case marking pattern. The language also appears to have an extensive verbal inflectional system, and many verbalisers. 2 Abbreviations 0 zero marked morpheme 1 first person 1DU first person dual 1PL first person plural 1SG first person singular 2 second person 2DU second person dual 2PL second person plural 2SG second person singular 3 third person 3DU third person dual 3PL third person plural 3SG third person singular A the transitive subject ABL ablative ACC accusative ALL/ALL2 allative ASP aspect marker BUFF buffer morpheme C consonant CAUS causative COM comitative DAT dative DEM demonstrative DU dual EMPH emphatic marker ERG ergative EXCL exclusive, excluding addressee FACT factitive FUT future tense HORT hortative ImmPAST immediate past IMP imperative INCHO inchoative INCL inclusive, including addressee INSTR instrumental LOC locative NEG negation NMLISER nominaliser NOM nominative N.SUFF nominal class suffix OBSCRD obscured perception P the transitive object p.c.
  • Second Native Title Win for Gooniyandi People

    Second Native Title Win for Gooniyandi People

    KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL No. 4 DEC 2016 • GETTING BACK COUNTRY • CARING FOR COUNTRY • SECURING THE FUTURE PO Box 2145 | Broome WA 6725 | Ph: (08) 9194 0100 | Fax: (08) 9193 6279 | www.klc.org.au 2016 AGM STRENGTH SHOWN AT JOINT AGMs FULL STORY PAGE 14 Second native title win for Gooniyandi people The Gooniyandi people have been recognised as the native title holders of a further 184 square kilometres of their country in the central Kimberley. Made over part of the Yarrangi Riwi Yoowarni Gooniyandi native title claim, the consent determination was handed down by Justice Barker of the Federal Court of Australia in Perth on 25 October 2016. The ruling comes after native title was first recognised for the Gooniyandi people, people of the Fitzroy River, in 2013 over 1.12 million hectares of land and water. Continued on page 4. Referendum Council to visit Broome The Kimberley Land Council discussion about Aboriginal and The 1967 referendum was hugely together with the Referendum Torres Strait Islander people successful, with more than 90 per Council will host one of 12 being included in the Constitution cent of Australians voting ‘yes’ to meetings about the Constitution – Australia’s rule book. delete two racially discriminatory that will be held across the nation references in the Constitution. over the coming months. “The Constitution needs to adequately incorporate key A new referendum will start Scheduled for February next considerations for Indigenous a process to reform the year, the Broome meeting will people,” Mr Hunter said. Constitution. invite 100 Indigenous participants from across northern Western “The Constitution has not been A successful referendum is a Australia to discuss changing the updated to reflect Indigenous starting point, but will not fix Australian Constitution.
  • Commonwealth of Australia

    Commonwealth of Australia

    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 Warning This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of The Charles Darwin University with permission from the author(s). Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander THESAURUS First edition by Heather Moorcroft and Alana Garwood 1996 Acknowledgements ATSILIRN conference delegates for the 1st and 2nd conferences. Alex Byrne, Melissa Jackson, Helen Flanders, Ronald Briggs, Julie Day, Angela Sloan, Cathy Frankland, Andrew Wilson, Loris Williams, Alan Barnes, Jeremy Hodes, Nancy Sailor, Sandra Henderson, Lenore Kennedy, Vera Dunn, Julia Trainor, Rob Curry, Martin Flynn, Dave Thomas, Geraldine Triffitt, Bill Perrett, Michael Christie, Robyn Williams, Sue Stanton, Terry Kessaris, Fay Corbett, Felicity Williams, Michael Cooke, Ely White, Ken Stagg, Pat Torres, Gloria Munkford, Marcia Langton, Joanna Sassoon, Michael Loos, Meryl Cracknell, Maggie Travers, Jacklyn Miller, Andrea McKey, Lynn Shirley, Xalid Abd-ul-Wahid, Pat Brady, Sau Foster, Barbara Lewancamp, Geoff Shepardson, Colleen Pyne, Giles Martin, Herbert Compton Preface Over the past months I have received many queries like "When will the thesaurus be available", or "When can I use it". Well here it is. At last the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Thesaurus, is ready. However, although this edition is ready, I foresee that there will be a need for another and another, because language is fluid and will change over time. As one of the compilers of the thesaurus I am glad it is finally completed and available for use.
  • 2. Working on the Dictionary

    2. Working on the Dictionary

    2 Working on the dictionary Rhonda Inkamala Aranda1 Imanka kngarriparta ntjarra purta urrkapumala ngkitja Aranda nurnaka kngartiwuka pa intalhilaka. Ngkitja intalhilakala nhanha nama marra, rilha ntjarrala, artwala, arrkutjala, kitjia itna kaltjirramala ngkitja nurnakanha ritamilatjika, intalhilatjika, kitjia ntjarranha ikarltala kuta kaltjanthitjika. Kuka yatinya ntjarraka pmara ntilatjika, ngkitja Arandala pmara rritnya ilatjika, marna pa tnuntha rilhakanha ingkarraka ntyarra nthitjika. Kaltjala ntama ngkitja nurnakanha ikarlta kuta tnyinatjinanga. Pipa Dictionary nhanhala ngkitja nurnakanha Luritja pa Aranda lhangkarama, nthakanha intalhilatja, ritamilatjika ngkitja nurnakanha ikarlta kuta tnyinatjika. Kwaiya kngarra nuka ‘Nangalanha’ Clara Ngala Inkamala ira imangka urrkaputjarta CAAMA2 Radio Imparja Television—Nganampa Anwernekenhe Language and Culture Programme. Nhanha ntama ngkitja kuka irala ngkama: ‘Ngkitja nurnakanha ilkarlta kuta tnyinatjika’. 1 I choose to use this spelling of our language, because it is phonetic and reflects our history. 2 Central Australian Aboriginal Media Association. 15 CARL STREHLOW’S 1909 ComparatiVE Heritage Dictionary Figure 8: Rhonda Inkamala working at the Strehlow Research Centre, 2017. Source: Adam Macfie, Strehlow Research Centre, Alice Springs. Luritja Irriti Anangu nganampa tjuta tjungungkuya wangka Luritja kampa kutjupa nguru walkatjunu. Wangka nganampa kwarri palya ngaranyi, uwankarrangku ritamilanytjaku walkatjunkunytjaku. Nganampa waltja tjutaya irriti ngurra nyanga tjanala nyinapayi, Ungkungka-la
  • PUBLISHED VERSION Peter Sutton Cross-Comment on Denham's

    PUBLISHED VERSION Peter Sutton Cross-Comment on Denham's

    PUBLISHED VERSION Peter Sutton Cross-comment on Denham's beyond fictions of closure in Australian Aboriginal kinship Mathematical Anthropology and Cultural Theory, 2013; 5(6):1-7 ©2013 all rights reserved by the author PERMISSIONS Emailed Peter Sutton 6 Feb 2015, advising Full text added. Author to advise if he would prefer his work not to be exposed in this way 6 Feb 2015 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/89093 MATHEMATICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL VOLUME 5 NO. 6 MAY 2013 CROSS - COMMENT ON DENHAM’S BEYOND FICTIONS OF CLOSURE IN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL KINSHIP PETER SUTTON UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE, AND SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM [email protected] COPYRIGHT 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY AUTHOR SUBMITTED: APRIL 1, 2013 ACCEPTED: APRIL 15, 2013 MATHEMATICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ISSN 1544-5879 SUTTON: CROSS - COMMENT ON DENHAM’S BEYOND FICTIONS OF CLOSURE WWW.MATHEMATICALANTHROPOLOGY.ORG MATHEMATICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL VOLUME 5 NO. 6 PAGE 1 OF 6 MAY 2013 CROSS - COMMENT ON DENHAM’S BEYOND FICTIONS OF CLOSURE IN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL KINSHIP PETER SUTTON This cross-comment is intended mainly to enter onto the published record some further well- based statistics on rates of marriage inside and outside the linguistic identity group in Aboriginal Australia. Here I focus on the cases of Mangarla and Nyikina people of the South Kimberley region in north-west Western Australia. Mangarla is a Western Desert linguistic variety and a member of the very large Pama-Nyungan genetic subgroup of Australian languages. Nyikina is a member of the Nyul-Nyulan family, and very far distant from Mangarla in genetic terms.
  • Language and Culture. Work Papers of SIL-AAB, Series B, Volume 8. INSTITUTION Summer Inst

    Language and Culture. Work Papers of SIL-AAB, Series B, Volume 8. INSTITUTION Summer Inst

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 282 426 FL 016 724 AUTHOR Hargrave, Susanne, Ed. TITLE Language and Culture. Work Papers of SIL-AAB, Series B, Volume 8. INSTITUTION Summer Inst. of Linguistics, Darwin (Australia). Australian Aborigines Branch. REPORT NO ISBN-0-86892-252-8 PUB DATE Dec 82 NOTE 242p. PUB TYPE Collected Works - General (020)-- Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Children; Color; Comparative Analysis; Concept Formation; Creoles; *Cultural Context; Cultural Traits; Ethnic Groups; Females; Foreign Countries; *Indigenous Populations; *Kinship; Language Research; Lexicology; Linguistic Theory; Literacy; *Mathematical Concepts; Social Values; Sociocultural Patterns; Structural Analysis (Linguistics); Uncommonly Taught Languages; *Vocabulary IDENTIFIERS *Aboriginal People; Anindilyakwa; *Australia;Yanyuwa Possessives ABSTRACT Six Papers on the relationship of language and culture in the Australian Aboriginal contextare presented. "Some Thoughts on Yanyuwa Language and Culture" byJean Kirton gives an overview of some language-culture relationships and examinesseven kinds of possession in one language. "Nyangumarta Kinship:A Woman's Viewpoint" by Helen Geytenbeck outlines kinship and itsterminology as learned by a field linguist for her work with thisgroup. In "A Description of the Mathematical Concepts of Groote Hylandt Aborigines," Judith Stokes describesan Anindilyakwa mathematical language in its cultural context, refuting popular-generalizations about the limited counting ability of the Aboriginal people."Facts and Fallacies of Aboriginal Number Systems" by John Harriscriticizes anthropologists' and linguists' neglect of and bias concerning existing data about the mathematics of Aboriginalgroups. In "Aboriginal Mathematical Concepts: A Cultural and Linguistic Explanation for Some of the Problems," BarbaraSayers suggests that the mathematical problems of some Aboriginal schoolchildrenare real, but have a cultural rather than linguistic basis.
  • Meteoritics and Cosmology Among the Aboriginal Cultures of Central Australia

    Meteoritics and Cosmology Among the Aboriginal Cultures of Central Australia

    Journal of Cosmology, Volume 13, pp. 3743-3753 (2011) Meteoritics and Cosmology Among the Aboriginal Cultures of Central Australia Duane W. Hamacher Department of Indigenous Studies, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia [email protected] Abstract The night sky played an important role in the social structure, oral traditions, and cosmology of the Arrernte and Luritja Aboriginal cultures of Central Australia. A component of this cosmology relates to meteors, meteorites, and impact craters. This paper discusses the role of meteoritic phenomena in Arrernte and Luritja cosmology, showing not only that these groups incorporated this phenomenon in their cultural traditions, but that their oral traditions regarding the relationship between meteors, meteorites and impact structures suggests the Arrernte and Luritja understood that they are directly related. Note to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Readers This paper contains the names of, and references to, people that have passed away and references the book “Nomads of the Australian Desert” by Charles P. Mountford (1976), which was banned for sale in the Northern Territory as it contained secret information about the Pitjantjatjara. No information from the Pitjantjatjara in that book is contained in this paper. 1.0 Introduction Creation stories are the core of cosmological knowledge of cultures around the globe. To most groups of people, the origins of the land, sea, sky, flora, fauna, and people are formed by various mechanisms from deities or beings at some point in the distant past. Among the more than 400 Aboriginal language groups of Australia (Walsh, 1991) that have inhabited the continent for at least 45,000 years (O’Connell & Allen, 2004) thread strong oral traditions that describe the origins of the world, the people, and the laws and social structure on which the community is founded, commonly referred to as “The Dreaming” (Dean, 1996).