Madagascar, Notamment Celles Chantal Blanc-Pamard
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
World Bank Document
Sample Procurement Plan Agriculture and Land Growth Management Project (P151469) Public Disclosure Authorized I. General 2. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan: Original: January 2016 – Revision PP: December 2016 – February 2017 3. Date of General Procurement Notice: - 4. Period covered by this procurement plan: July 2016 to December 2017 II. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: [Thresholds for applicable Public Disclosure Authorized procurement methods (not limited to the list below) will be determined by the Procurement Specialist /Procurement Accredited Staff based on the assessment of the implementing agency’s capacity.] Type de contrats Montant contrat Méthode de passation de Contrat soumis à revue a en US$ (seuil) marchés priori de la banque 1. Travaux ≥ 5.000.000 AOI Tous les contrats < 5.000.000 AON Selon PPM < 500.000 Consultation des Selon PPM fournisseurs Public Disclosure Authorized Tout montant Entente directe Tous les contrats 2. Fournitures ≥ 500.000 AOI Tous les contrats < 500.000 AON Selon PPM < 200.000 Consultation des Selon PPM fournisseurs Tout montant Entente directe Tous les contrats Tout montant Marchés passes auprès Tous les contrats d’institutions de l’organisation des Nations Unies Public Disclosure Authorized 2. Prequalification. Bidders for _Not applicable_ shall be prequalified in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10 of the Guidelines. July 9, 2010 3. Proposed Procedures for CDD Components (as per paragraph. 3.17 of the Guidelines: - 4. Reference to (if any) Project Operational/Procurement Manual: Manuel de procedures (execution – procedures administratives et financières – procedures de passation de marches): décembre 2016 – émis par l’Unite de Gestion du projet Casef (Croissance Agricole et Sécurisation Foncière) 5. -
Fianarantsoa
NY FIA NGONA NA /SA N-KER/N TA ONA TAO FIANARANTSOA. NY KOMITIN, NY ISAN-KERINTAONA. N y M isio n ar y.— Kev. J. Pearse sy Rev. T. Rowlands sy Rev. A . S. Hnekett ary Rev. H . T. Johnson. N y Evangelistra.— Rafolo fFianarantsoaJ, Rainizana- mandroso f Ambalavao AtsimoJ, Andrianome f TsimaitohasoaJ, Rainijaonary fAlarobiaJ, Rainizanabelo fVohitsisahyJ, Rako- tovao f TsimahamenalamhaJ, Rainijoelina fAlahamisyJ, Ra- benjanahary f AmbohinamboarinaJ, Rakotovao f laritsenaJ. N y M pita n le in a n y Re n i- fiangon ana.— Ramorasata sy Rarinosy f A ntranobirikyJ, Rainiboreda sy Ravelojaonina flvohidahyJ, Andriamahefa sy Rabarijaonina f AmbalavaoJ, Rahaingomanana fFanjakana'j, Rainivao sy Rainimamonjy fAmbohinamboarinaJ, Rainisamoelina fAmbohimandroso A m - bonyj, Rajoelina sy Rasamoelina f Ambohimandroso AmbanyJ. N y I r a k y n y Re n i- eiangonana,— Andrianaivo sy Raben- godona f AntranobirihyJ, Rajaonimaria sy Razaka flvohidahyJ, Rainiketakandriana sy Rakotovao f AmbalavaoJ, Raiaiz&kftnosy sy Rainitsimba ary Rainizanajaza f Ambohimand,»eàQ T sermana a m y n y K om ity.— Raveloj aoniAa Sek r e ta r y.—Rakotovao. M p it a h ir y v o l a .— Rev. J. Pearse. M pa n d in ik a n y taratasim - bola.— Rafolo IRAKY NY ISAN-KERINTAONA NT AMPOVOA.N-TANT. Anarany. Tany ampianarany. Andria nainelona . Iavonomby, Halangina. Andriambao ........... Ambohibary, Isandra (avar.) Rapaoly ........... Vohimarina, Iarindrano (avar.) Andrianay ................ Nasandratrony, Isandra (atsiai.) Raobena | ........... Manandriana Mpanampy J Rainianjalahy......... Iarinomby, Ambohimandroso (atsin.) Andriamitsirimanga Iandraina, Ambohimandroso (andref.) NY ANY AMY NY BARA. Ramainba ................ Sahanambo Andriambelo ...... Vohibe NY ANY AMY NY TANALA. Andrianantsiony .. Vohitrosy Anjolobato Vohimanitra NY ANY AMY NY SAKALAVA. -
Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra, -
TDR Annexe7 Rapport Analyse 322 Communes OATF
ETAT DES LIEUX DES 319 COMMUNES POUR LE FINANCEMENT ADDITIONNEL DU PROJET CASEF Février 2019 TABLE DES MATIERES TABLE DES MATIERES .................................................................................................................... i LISTE DES ACRONYMES ................................................................................................................ iii Liste des tableaux ......................................................................................................................... v Listes des Cartes ........................................................................................................................... v Liste des figures ............................................................................................................................vi Liste des photos ...........................................................................................................................vi I INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 II METHODOLOGIES .................................................................................................................... 2 II.1 CHOIX DES 322 COMMUNES OBJETS D’ENQUETE ............................................................... 2 II.2 CHOIX DES CRITERES DE SELECTION DES COMMUNES ........................................................ 5 II.3 METHODOLOGIE DE COLLECTE DE DONNEES ET ACTIVITES ................................................. 6 -
Mobilizing Farmers' Knowledge of the Soil
Chapter 18 Mobilizing Farmers' Knowledge of the Soil Domoina J. Rakotoson, Lovatiana A. Rakotonirina, and Georges Serpantie One way in which a culture can be read is through the way its people control their material environment, and through the knowledge that accompanies it. Such knowledge is part and parcel of social representations, which are ways of imagining daily life and the world, as developed, shared and transmitted within a community. They set up a consensual reality, and orientate the behaviour of a group, with the view of controlling the social, material, and ideological environment (Levy and Lussault 2003). In rural communities, control and use of land is one arena where "local" or "indigenous" knowledge is one of the main determinants. We will focus on such "local land knowledge". While there is a purely anthropological interest in these folk representations and classifications (Friedberg 1992; Holman 2005), there is also a practical interest in how this rural knowledge interfaces with the external stakeholders' ideas that are often derived from popularized scientific knowledge. In every project concerning rural areas, indigenous knowledge (particularly among the farmers) must be recognized and taken into account in order to bring about consensus between various stakeholders on actions to be carried out (Dupre 1991; Roose, 1994). An example from Madagascar will show how the mobilization of rural knowledge about the soil, and close observations of cultivated soils and indigenous agricultural practices, are particularly important components of projects aimed at achieving sustainable agriculture. Separated with South-East Africa by the Mozambique Channel, Madagascar is the fourth largest island in the world, and contains a wide variety of landscapes and ecosystems. -
Dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfs
dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm REPOBLIKAN'I MADAGASIKARA Fitiavana - Tanindrazana - Fandrosoana ----------------- HAUTE COUR CONSTITUTIONNELLE RESULTATS DEFINITIFS DU SECOND TOUR DE L'ELECTION PRESIDENTIELLE DU 19 DECEMBRE 2018 dfggfdgffhCode BV: 330601010101 dfggfdgffhBureau de vote: EPP ALAKAMISY ITENINA SALLE 1 dfggfdgffhCommune: ALAKAMISY ITENINA dfggfdgffhDistrict: VOHIBATO dfggfdgffhRegion: HAUTE MATSIATRA dfggfdgffhProvince: FIANARANTSOA Inscrits : 405 Votants: 238 Blancs et Nuls: 2 Soit: 0,84% Suffrages exprimes: 236 Soit: 99,16% Taux de participation: 58,77% N° d'ordre Logo Photo Nom et Prenoms Candidat Voix obtenues Pourcentage 13 RAJOELINA Andry Nirina 92 38,98% 25 RAVALOMANANA Marc 144 61,02% Total voix: 236 100,00% Copyright @ HCC 2019 dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm REPOBLIKAN'I MADAGASIKARA Fitiavana - Tanindrazana - Fandrosoana ----------------- HAUTE COUR CONSTITUTIONNELLE RESULTATS DEFINITIFS DU SECOND TOUR DE L'ELECTION PRESIDENTIELLE DU 19 DECEMBRE 2018 dfggfdgffhCode BV: 330601020101 dfggfdgffhBureau de vote: EPP AMBALAFAHIBATO SALLE 1 dfggfdgffhCommune: ALAKAMISY ITENINA dfggfdgffhDistrict: VOHIBATO dfggfdgffhRegion: HAUTE MATSIATRA dfggfdgffhProvince: FIANARANTSOA Inscrits : 576 Votants: 212 Blancs et Nuls: 3 Soit: 1,42% Suffrages exprimes: 209 Soit: 98,58% Taux de participation: 36,81% N° d'ordre Logo Photo Nom et Prenoms Candidat Voix obtenues Pourcentage 13 RAJOELINA Andry Nirina 68 32,54% 25 RAVALOMANANA Marc 141 67,46% Total voix: 209 100,00% Copyright @ HCC 2019 dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm -
Thesis.Pdf (1.137Mb)
Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education Francesca Castagnetti Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies May 2018 Seeds of Resistance: Civil Society Organisations, Land Rights and Food Sovereignty in Madagascar A Participatory Research with VOIALA-Madagascar on Communities’ Resistance to Large Scale Land Acquisition Deals in Haute Matsiatra, Madagascar Seeds of Resistance: Civil Society Organisations, Land Rights and Food Sovereignty in Madagascar A Participatory Research with VOIALA-Madagascar on Communities’ Resistance to Large Scale Land Acquisition Deals in Haute Matsiatra, Madagascar By Francesca Castagnetti Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education May 2018 Supervisor Camilla Brattland Adviser Jennifer Hays Cover Photo: Photos by the Author – Artwork by Sasha Castagnetti i ii To the Communities I have called Home, in Sápmi, Madagascar and Kent, that welcomed me with their wealth of Generous Hearts and Inspiring Minds iii George Orwell wrote in 1944 in the UK: “Stop to consider how the so-called owners of the land got hold of it. They simply seized it by force, afterwards hiring lawyers to provide them with title-deeds. In the case of the enclosure of the common lands, which was going on from about 1600 to 1850, the land-grabbers did not even have the excuse of being foreign conquerors; they were quite frankly taking the heritage of their own countrymen, upon no sort of pretext except that they had the power to do so.” 1 1 7<,22,57., -!-+, 49/,70.0485-756,79>04 (4+''(*,#.#&#.#-$#+%'*!*"#. *'%9/,570.04(2'& '.%* ,970,;,+ (7*/ &**,88,+ ' iv Acknowledgements The last two years were filled with plenty of people and explorations to be grateful for, so this is a long list. -
Feedback Madagascar – Ankarinomby
The Feedback Trust Scottish Charity No. SC023568 Construction of a new school for the Ankarinomby Secondary School in Madagascar (FF 441 - 01) Final report May 2019 Feedback Madagascar/Ny Tanintsika (FBM/NT) – The Eagle Foundation 1 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Project location ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Calendar of achievements ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Details on the project ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Difficulties encountered ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Project beneficiaries ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Expenditure summary ................................................................................................................................................ 18 Current situation........................................................................................................................................................ -
Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar
Public Disclosure Authorized Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar INCEPTION REPORT [ENGLISH VERSION] August 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared by SHER Ingénieurs-Conseils s.a. in association with Mhylab, under contract to The World Bank. It is one of several outputs from the small hydro Renewable Energy Resource Mapping and Geospatial Planning [Project ID: P145350]. This activity is funded and supported by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a multi-donor trust fund administered by The World Bank, under a global initiative on Renewable Energy Resource Mapping. Further details on the initiative can be obtained from the ESMAP website. This document is an interim output from the above-mentioned project. Users are strongly advised to exercise caution when utilizing the information and data contained, as this has not been subject to full peer review. The final, validated, peer reviewed output from this project will be a Madagascar Small Hydro Atlas, which will be published once the project is completed. Copyright © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1-202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the consultants listed, and not of World Bank staff. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use. -
GL Madagascar Strategy 2016 – 2020
GL Madagascar Strategy 2016 – 2020 Figure 1: 08 March celebration, Tuléar, Madagascar http://gemcommunity.genderlinks.org.za/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=50400 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Table of key indicators Summary Strategic positioning Regional context Political context Key gender issues GL‟s Theory of Change GL’s Programme of Action Alliance Media Governance and economic justice Partnerships Results for Change Lessons learned Strategic thrust 2016-2020 Institutional effectiveness Risk analysis Internal and external Sustainability Programme Funding Diversification Annexes A. Local government beneficiary analysis B. SWOT C. Intervention logic Accompanying documents Budget 2016 - 2020 2 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table of key indicators KEY INDICATORS FOR MONITORING GL MADAGASCAR WORK 2015 Target - 2020 Impact level indicators SADC Gender and Development Index Score 60% 72% Citizen Score Card 69% 83% Life time experience of GBV – 2012 Gender Progress Score - 2015 64% 77% % women in parliament - 2014 21% 42% % women in local government - 2014 6% 20% % women sources in the media - 2010 31% 50% Outcome level indicators Average Gender and Local Government Score (GLGS) – 2014 68% 82% Highest GLGS – 2015 91% 98% Lowest GLGS- 2015 47% 56% Contribution by councils to COE work in 2015 40 000 ZAR 120 000 ZAR Overall COE budget in 2015 2 928 350 ZAR 8 785 000 ZAR % contribution by COE‟s 1.4% 1.4 % Average Gender and Media Score (GMS) – 2015 77% 92% Highest GMS – 2015 94% 98% Lowest GMS -2015 59% 71% Outreach indicators -
En Suivant Ce Lien
Coopération décentralisée entre Suivi technique et financier des gestionnaires de réseau d’eau potable dans la Haute Matsiatra RAPPORT ANNUEL RESULTATS DE L’ANNEE 2018 Avec le soutien de TABLE DES MATIERES Table des matières .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Liste des figures ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Sigles et abréviations ........................................................................................................................................... 7 En résumé… 8 1. Éléments de cadrage ..................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. Contexte général ..................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Les réseaux objet du STEFI 2018 ............................................................................................................. 9 2. La méthodologie de collecte de données ................................................................................................... 15 3. Présentation des acteurs et des adductions d’eau objet du STEFI 2018 .................................................... 16 3.1. Les communes concernées ................................................................................................................... -
The Economics of Community Forest Management in Madagascar: Is There a Free Lunch? an Analysis of Transfert De Gestion
7 The economics of community forest management in Madagascar: is there a free lunch? An analysis of Transfert de Gestion Neal J. Hockley & Mijasoa M. Andriamarovololona 5th June 2007 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Development Alternatives, Inc. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the support and assistance of Tom Erdmann, Mark Freudenberger, Vololoniaina Raharinomenjanahary, and Mamy Rakotondrazaka of ERI. They conceived this study and provided so much useful advice and information, and we hope that the report provides a useful analysis of Community-Based Natural Resource Management in general, and Madagascar’s policy of Transfert de Gestion in particular. The study relied upon the assistance willingly provided by the communities of Angalampona, Anjahamana, Antsatrana, Didy, Tsaratanana, and Vohidrazana. We hope that this report can improve the prospects for Transfert de Gestion in Madagascar, helping them to achieve their ambitions for their COBAs. Andrew Cooke helpfully provided information on RESOLVE’s review of Transfert de Gestion and Chris Holmes provided extremely useful information on WCS’s program for supporting COBAs around Makira, while Jonathan Annis helped with informative discussions of water systems. Finally, Tom Erdmann, Mark Freudenberger and Julia Jones, read the first draft of the report in full, and provided insightful comments that greatly improved it. We of course take full responsibility for any remaining faults. Misaotra indrindra The economics of community forest management in Madagascar: is there a free lunch? Neal J. Hockley & Mijasoa M. Andriamarovololona 1 Principal Consultant School of the Environment and Natural Resources, University of Wales, Bangor, Wales.