DOCSLIB.ORG

126613913.23.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
126613913.23.Pdf I ;^s. 2_& PUBLICATIONS OF THE SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY VOLUME XXV GENERAL ASSEMBLY COMMISSION RECORDS II December 1896 THE RECORDS OF THE COMMISSIONS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLIES OF THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND HOLDEN IN EDINBURGH THE YEARS 1648 and 1649 Edited from the Original Manuscript by ALEXANDER F. MITCHELL, D.D., LL.D. And JAMES CHRISTIE, D.D. EDINBURGH Printed at the University Press by T. and A. Constable for the Scottish History Society 1896 INTRODUCTION The state of my health during the last six months will, I trust, be accepted as a valid excuse for my not attempting to write so detailed an introduction to this volume of the Records of the Commission of the General Assembly as I wrote to the former one, and that this excuse will be accepted all the more readily when I state, that it has been mainly by my efforts to fulfil the work I had undertaken for this and a kindred society, that my health has given way. By the departure of the Scottish army from England in 1646-7, the unique influence of Scotland on England in matters of both civil and ecclesiastical policy was sadly weakened; and by the ill-starred invasion of England by the Duke of Hamilton and the adherents of the ‘Unlawful Engage- ment,’ nominally to ensure the restoration of Charles to his regal power on Covenanting terms, but really to secure his deliverance from his Sectarian jailors on terms less onerous, that influence may be said to have been finally extinguished, and the calamity the invaders sought to avert rendered all but inevitable. Not that the dim idea of such a catastrophe, as was at length hurried on, had not been previously brooding in the minds of the Army leaders, and had been resolutely adopted by them when the English Parliament, under the influence of the Presbyterian party, resolved to make one more effort to negotiate a satisfactory treaty with the King. The King, according to his usual policy, haggled on various matters on which in the end he was obliged to give way, and, on the 5th December 1648, a majority of the House of vi INTRODUCTION Commons voted ‘that the King’s offers afforded a ground of settlement.’ Then, without loss of time, the leaders of the Army ventured to assail the freedom of Parliament itself, and forcibly to exclude the chiefs of the Presbyterian party from taking their seats in the House of Commons, and the House, thus maimed, recalled its former vote, and became the obedient tool of its new masters, claiming supreme power of legislation without the concurrence of the House of Lords. One of its first acts was to give effect to what had been simmering in the minds of the army leaders for months past,1 and to declare the unfortunate monarch to have been the main cause of the late wars and bloodshed, and, maimed and overborne by a faction, as it was, to improvise a tribunal unknown to the constitution,2 for the trial and punishment of the King. The legality of this tribunal was challenged by the King, and he refused to acknowledge its authority, or to plead to the indictment before it. He was nevertheless condemned to death, 1 This is clearly implied in various parts of the ‘ Remonstrance ’ of Fairfax and his officers, though the Remonstrance itself only came out in November 1848. See especially pp. 48 ... 54. ‘ In all cases of like rebellions or civil wars, the prudence of most nations and ages (as well as the justice of the thing) has led to fix the exemplary punishment first upon the capital leader, and upon others nearest to him, and not to punish the inferiors and exempt the chiefs, so in this case it is most clear, that to fix your justice first upon the head and thereby let his successors see what themselves may expect, if they attempt the like, may hopefully discourage them . and so is like to be a real security,’ p. 50. ‘ If any . object that the grounds aforegoing . would extend, as well against any accommodation with him, since his person came into the Parliament’s power, or at least against any restitution thereupon (without his first submitting to judgment and a change of heart and principles) and, consequently, would have served as well against that accommodation with him, and restitution of him, which the Army seemed once to plead for, we shall confess it, as to the main,’ p. 51. And then in the following pages they enlarge on the reasons which moved them, which were, first. The Parliament’s engagement with Scotland for another address to him ; and second, The clause in the Solemn League and Covenant as to the preservation of the king’s person, now to be ignored. 2 ‘ The work of military violence, clothed in the merest tatters of legality . the small minority in Parliament, which had given the semblance of con- stitutional procedure to the trial in Westminster Halls, were no more than the instruments in the hands of the men of the sword.’—Gardiner’s History of the Commonwealth, vol. i. p. 1. INTRODUCTION vii and when on 30th January 1648-9, the sentence was carried out in front of his own palace of Whitehall, ‘one dismal universal groan burst from the horror-stricken crowd.’ Whatever doubt may exist as to the action or inaction of the Westminster Assembly in the case of Archbishop Laud, there can be no doubt as to the courage and promptitude with which its leaders and the Presbyterian ministers of London generally protested against the judicial murder of the King, nor as to the earnest anxiety they showed to the last to help forward any settlement of outstanding differences, which would have saved the monarchy, and afforded reasonable security for the liberties of the Parliament and the Refor- mation of the Church. But their fast friends and allies, the Scotch, had long ere this returned to their homes, and, when too late, the Presbyterians in the south learned the value of their faithful warnings, and found they were indeed at the mercy of that Sectarian Army, who were bent on securing their own ends, though these should have to be gained by over- turning the ancient constitution of the kingdom, and setting up in its room a commonwealth in name—an oligarchy1 or military despotism in fact. The committee of the Scottish Estates had instructed their Commissioners to protest against the trial of the King, and the Commissioners of the Scottish Assembly, concurring in the protest, expressed their utter detestation of ‘ so horrid a design against his Majesty’s person,’ and disclaimed all responsibility for ‘ the miseries, confusions, and calamities that might follow.’ Their deputy, Blair, minister of St. Andrews and Scottish Chaplain to the King, expressed himself as strongly on the enormity of this act as the most ardent Royalist could desire, and never ceased to speak of the unfortunate monarch in terms of warm affection and regard.2 His early interviews with Cromwell, on the 1 ‘ The oligarchy which had usurped the name of a Commonwealth.’—Gardiner’s Commonwealth,2 vol. i. p. 199. Blair’s Autobiography and Life, pp. 214, 261, ‘a good king evil-used.’ viii INTRODUCTION other hand, seem to have left on his mind impressions1 even less favourable than those which Baxter and Ussher formed from their intercourse with him. Immediately on learning that the ‘horrid design1 had actually been carried out, the Committee of the Scottish Estates caused Charles n. to be proclaimed as the lawful heir of his father in the kingdoms of Scotland, England, and Ireland, and sent to their Commis- sioners in London a copy of the proclamation, with a remon- strance to the House of Commons, which gave so great offence to the regicides, that they first imprisoned the Commissioners, and soon after ignominiously dismissed them from the kingdom, under the escort of a troop of horse.2 The Scotch sent deputies to invite the young King to come among them, subscribe their Covenants, and take possession of his throne. At first they were unsuccessful, but both Parliament and Church persevered in their suit, and at last prevailed on him to accept their invitation and terms. But he was far from sincere in the matter, and soon showed it was dire necessity, not hearty consent, which made him stoop to do so. Moreover, an extreme party had sprung up among themselves, who were too much in sympathy with the Sectaries of the south and too distrustful of their old Royalist countrymen. In their earnest desire to satisfy the scruples and disarm the hostility of these men, the more moderate party consented to measures which were harsh towards their sovereign, and towards many, who were really eager to forget past differences, and do their utmost to defend their native country against the formidable force which was now preparing to assail it. Fairfax, having refused to lead that force, resigned his office as Commander-in-chief, which was devolved on Cromwell, who did not share his scruples. All, that the caution and skill of experienced generals could in the circumstances effect to force him back to England, was done by the Leslies and the troops under their command. But, 1 Blair’s Autobiography and Life, p. 210, ‘ an egregious dissembler and a great liar.’ 2 See in these Minutes, pp. 229, 230, note. INTRODUCTION ix through the interference and dictation of a Committee of the Estates,1 it is said, their plans were at last thwarted, the triumph which seemed within their grasp was snatched from them, and a disaster was inflicted on the nation which was great in its immediate, and still greater in its remoter conse- quences.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Memorial Volume of St. Andrews University In
    DUPLICATE FROM THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, ST. ANDREWS, SCOTLAND. GIFT OF VOTIVA TABELLA H H H The Coats of Arms belong respectively to Alexander Stewart, natural son James Kennedy, Bishop of St of James IV, Archbishop of St Andrews 1440-1465, founder Andrews 1509-1513, and John Hepburn, Prior of St Andrews of St Salvator's College 1482-1522, cofounders of 1450 St Leonard's College 1512 The University- James Beaton, Archbishop of St Sir George Washington Andrews 1 522-1 539, who com- Baxter, menced the foundation of St grand-nephew and representative Mary's College 1537; Cardinal of Miss Mary Ann Baxter of David Beaton, Archbishop 1539- Balgavies, who founded 1546, who continued his brother's work, and John Hamilton, Arch- University College bishop 1 546-1 57 1, who com- Dundee in pleted the foundation 1880 1553 VOTIVA TABELLA A MEMORIAL VOLUME OF ST ANDREWS UNIVERSITY IN CONNECTION WITH ITS QUINCENTENARY FESTIVAL MDCCCCXI MCCCCXI iLVal Quo fit ut omnis Votiva pateat veluti descripta tabella Vita senis Horace PRINTED FOR THE UNIVERSITY BY ROBERT MACLEHOSE AND COMPANY LIMITED MCMXI GIF [ Presented by the University PREFACE This volume is intended primarily as a book of information about St Andrews University, to be placed in the hands of the distinguished guests who are coming from many lands to take part in our Quincentenary festival. It is accordingly in the main historical. In Part I the story is told of the beginning of the University and of its Colleges. Here it will be seen that the University was the work in the first instance of Churchmen unselfishly devoted to the improvement of their country, and manifesting by their acts that deep interest in education which long, before John Knox was born, lay in the heart of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • DOUGLAS WILSON the Stalwart Courage of John Knox
    FOR KIRK AND COVENANT The Stalwart Courage of John Knox DOUGLAS WILSON For Kirk and Covenant FOR KIRK AND COVENANT The Stalwart Courage of John Knox DOUGLAS WILSON Blog & Mablog Press and Tire Center Moscow, Idaho www.dougwils.com Douglas Wilson, For Kirk and Covenant: The Stalwart Courage of John Knox, ©2000, 2020 by Douglas Wilson. First edition published 2000 by Cumberland Press. Second edition published 2020 by Blog & Mablog Press and Tire Center. Cover design and interior layout: Valerie Anne Bost Cover images: A letter from John Knox to Queen Elizabeth I dated 6 August 1561. A 1602 engraving of Knox by Hendrick Hondius (after Adrian Vanson). The original is on display in the Scottish National Por- trait Gallery. Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture quotations are from the New King James Version®. Copyright ©1982 by Thomas Nelson. Used by permis- sion. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations marked AV are from the Authorized (King James) Version. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or otherwise, without prior permis- sion of the author, except as provided by USA copyright law. All Scripture quotations are from the King James Version. For my first grandson, Knox Alexander Merkle May you soon take your place in the long battle, And fight as honestly as your namesake. CONTENTS Acknowledgments ...................................xi Foreword to the First Edition .........................xiii
    [Show full text]
  • 107394589.23.Pdf
    Scs s-r<?s/ &.c £be Scottish tlert Society SATIRICAL POEMS OF THE TIME OF THE REFORMATION SATIRICAL POEMS OF THE TIME OF THE REFORMATION EDITED BY JAMES CRANSTOUN, LL.D. VOL. II. ('library''. ) Printcti fat tljt Sacietg Iig WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS EDINBURGH AND LONDON MDCCCXCIII V PREFATORY NOTE TO VOL. II. The present volume is for the most part occupied with Notes and Glossary. Two poems by Thomas Churchyard — “ The Siege of Edenbrough Castell ” and “ Mvrtons Tragedie ”—have been included, as possessing considerable interest of themselves, and as illustrating two important poems in the collection. A complete Index of Proper Names has also been given. By some people, I am aware, the Satirical Poems of the Time of the Reformation that have come down to us through black- letter broadsheets are considered as of little consequence, and at best only “sorry satire.” But researches in the collections of historical manuscripts preserved in the State-Paper Office and the British Museum have shown that, however deficient these ballads may be in the element of poetry, they are eminently trustworthy, and thus have an unmistakable value, as contemporary records. A good deal of pains has accordingly been taken, by reference to accredited authorities, to explain unfamiliar allusions and clear up obscure points in the poems. It is therefore hoped that not many difficulties remain to perplex the reader. A few, however, have defied solution. To these, as they occurred, I have called attention in the notes, with a view to their being taken up by others who, with greater knowledge of the subject or ampler facilities for research than I possess, may be able to elucidate them.
    [Show full text]
  • JD Article for New College Anniversary Bulletin April 2006
    Article for New College Anniversary Bulletin April 2006 Teaching theology in Edinburgh: beginnings The teaching of theology and divinity has a very long history in Edinburgh, of which the New College phase only forms the latest chapter. In the sense of formal theological instruction, it was the Dominicans who began the tradition when their Edinburgh friary was founded in 1230, the first to be opened in Scotland. The Blackfriars buildings were in the Cowgate and by the sixteenth century they included a particularly fine hall, spacious enough to be the meeting place for the Councils of the Scottish Church called in 1549, 1552 and 1559 that produced reforming statutes and Archbishop Hamilton's Catechism. The hall was probably used on a daily basis to accommodate part of the comprehensive educational training undertaken by the friars, but they generously made way each year for the Scottish Exchequer and its accounting sessions. As the most commodious roofed space in Edinburgh, apart from the Castle and Holyrood, the Blackfriars hall was in considerable demand and it was at the heart of the famous 'Cleanse the Causeway' fight in 1520. During the 1550s there were attempts to make more provision for higher education in the capital. One initiative came from the Queen Regent, Mary of Guise, mother of Mary, Queen of Scots, who founded two public lectureships, one in Greek and another in civil and canon law, both regarded at the time as ecclesiastical subjects. The second initiative flowed from the noted humanist Robert Reid, bishop of Orkney, who left provision in his will in 1558 for a college with a distinctly non-clerical emphasis to be erected in Edinburgh to teach the 'new learning'.
    [Show full text]
  • Singing the Reformation: Celebrating Thomas Wode and His Partbooks 1562-92
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Singing the Reformation: Celebrating Thomas Wode and his Partbooks 1562-92 Citation for published version: Dawson, J & O'Regan, N 2011, Singing the Reformation: Celebrating Thomas Wode and his Partbooks 1562-92. Wode Psalter Project Team. <http://www.wode.div.ed.ac.uk./index.html> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publisher Rights Statement: © Dawson, J., & O'Regan, N. (2011). Singing the Reformation: Celebrating Thomas Wode and his Partbooks 1562-92. Wode Psalter Project Team. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 Edinburgh 2011 Wode Psalter Project Team Thou little church, to whom Christ hath restored The cleare lost light of his evangel pure: Thy God doth with all diligence procure, That with his worde, thou maist be stil decorde. [decorated] Thogh you have long his wholesome trueth abhorred Yet his great mercies did thy blindness cure Submitting thee, unto the careful cure, Of suche pastours, as truly teache his worde.
    [Show full text]
  • Who, Where and When: the History & Constitution of the University of Glasgow
    Who, Where and When: The History & Constitution of the University of Glasgow Compiled by Michael Moss, Moira Rankin and Lesley Richmond © University of Glasgow, Michael Moss, Moira Rankin and Lesley Richmond, 2001 Published by University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ Typeset by Media Services, University of Glasgow Printed by 21 Colour, Queenslie Industrial Estate, Glasgow, G33 4DB CIP Data for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 0 85261 734 8 All rights reserved. Contents Introduction 7 A Brief History 9 The University of Glasgow 9 Predecessor Institutions 12 Anderson’s College of Medicine 12 Glasgow Dental Hospital and School 13 Glasgow Veterinary College 13 Queen Margaret College 14 Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama 15 St Andrew’s College of Education 16 St Mungo’s College of Medicine 16 Trinity College 17 The Constitution 19 The Papal Bull 19 The Coat of Arms 22 Management 25 Chancellor 25 Rector 26 Principal and Vice-Chancellor 29 Vice-Principals 31 Dean of Faculties 32 University Court 34 Senatus Academicus 35 Management Group 37 General Council 38 Students’ Representative Council 40 Faculties 43 Arts 43 Biomedical and Life Sciences 44 Computing Science, Mathematics and Statistics 45 Divinity 45 Education 46 Engineering 47 Law and Financial Studies 48 Medicine 49 Physical Sciences 51 Science (1893-2000) 51 Social Sciences 52 Veterinary Medicine 53 History and Constitution Administration 55 Archive Services 55 Bedellus 57 Chaplaincies 58 Hunterian Museum and Art Gallery 60 Library 66 Registry 69 Affiliated Institutions
    [Show full text]
  • UC.-MASOM John Knox
    UC.-MASOM John Knox By J. D. Mackie Price One Shilling and Sixpence G 20 Historical Association 1951 \L SERIES : G.20 John Knox By J. D. Mackie, C.B.E., M.A., LL.D. Professor of Scottish History, University of Glasgow. Non-members may obtain copies at Is. 8d. each (post free), and members may obtain extra copies at lid. each (post free) from the Hon. Secretary of the Historical Association, 21, Bedford Square, London, W.C.I. Published for The Historical Association by George Philip & Son, Ltd. 32, Fleet Street, London, E.C.4 1951 i COPYRIGHT By the Historical Association 1951 John Knox DURING his own lifetime John Knox was engaged in violent dis- putes, and throughout the succeeding ages his character has been the subject of acrimonious controversy. To some of his con- temporaries he appeared as the apostle of eternal truth divinely inspired, to others as an architect of evil. Later ages saw him variously as a stirrer-up of strife, the founder of the protestant kirk, the perverter of reform into devious ways, the father of intolerance, the hero of the everlasting verity, the destroyer of the old and the beautiful. For centuries he was, despite all criticism, one of the heroes of Scotland. Latterly there has been an attempt to show him as the man who robbed Scotland of her heritage of art and enjoyment and plunged her into the ugly gloom of a perpetual Sabbath wherein the Calvinistic elect found their main pleasure in denouncing the shortcomings of blinded ritualists. And now the wheel comes round full circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbroath and Its Abbey
    •'^ mmk THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/arbroathitsabbeyOOmilliala IM. VUTM .-. SKETCH BT L>. MILLAR. ARBROATH ABBEY CHURCH FROM THE NORTH-WEST. ARBROATH AND ITS ABBEY THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE TOWN AND ABBEY ABERBROTHOCK INCLUDING ANTIQUITIES NOTICES OF ECCLESIASTICAL AND OTHER IN THE SURROUNDING DISTRICT DAVID MILLER EDINBURGH STREET THOMAS G. STEVENSON, 22 FREDERICK ADAMS & Co LONDON : HAMILTON, SON GLASGOW : MURRAY & MDCOCLX »! i €nt«tij in Stationtrs' fall. '^ AND BUNCLE. PKINTEBS. ABBROATH : KKKNKDY 4S'/li> PREFACE. The following pages have been published chiefly for those who take an interest in the locality of the ancient and now flourishing town of Arbroath, and also with the view of removing the obscurity which has hitherto involved the history of its once magnificent monasteiy. Among other sources of information the Chartulary of the Abbey is entitled to stand first in rank. The most interesting portions of these monastic writings have been digested and arranged in this volume. An endeavour has thus been made to bring out the points in which they, along with other authentic documents, tend to illustrate the history of the district. In alluding to the history of past times, our ancestors have been allowed as far as possible to appear in their own dress, and speak in their own words. This will account for the number of quotations in the antique style, which may probably render the perusal of some portions of the book a little difficult to readers otherwise well educated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divinity Principals in the University of Glasgow, 1545-1654
    R35 QforitBU Untucrsita library Strata, iSfEm fork V*\V>«TOjr>^ The d^te shows when this volume was taken. ; To ,rbne\^ this bookok. cottycoijy the callcal' No. and give to the" libnlibrarian. HOME USE RULES All books subject to recall All borrowers must regis- , 1 ter in the library to borrow books for home use. All books must be re-" t turned at end of college "' year for inspection arid repairs. \ i Limited books-, must be *.....;. returned within^ the four ' week limit and not renewed. "/""" Students' must return all books before leaving town. Officers should arrange ;for the return of books wanted during their absence from town. Volumiss of periodicals and of pamphlets are held ,in the library as much as possible. For special pur- poses they are given out for a limited time. ,". Borrowers should not use their library privileges for *" •' the benefit of other persons. Books: of special value '•'" " ' .;and gift books, when the giver wishes it, are not allowed to circulate. Readei;& are asked to re-;,, '^'- port all cases of books marked ,Qr mutilated. Do not deface books by marks and writing. Cornell University Library BX9099 .R35 Divinity principals in the University of 3 1924 029 476 086 olin Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029476086 THE DIVINITY PRINCIPALS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW PUBLISHED BY JAMES MACLEHOSE AND SONS, GLASGOW ^ixbliehns to the SlntDcreitg MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Pitcairn
    ROBERT PITCAIRN COMMENDATOR OF DUNFERMLINE ABBEY AT THE TIME OF THE REFORMATION Robert Pitcairn Commendator of Dunfermline Abbey, Legate and Secretary of State in the minority of King James VI of Scotland. ISBN 978-1-909634-27-5 By Andrew Shearer, OBE Transcribed by Sheila Pitcairn, F.S.A. Scot., L.H.G. 2 Contents Chapter Page I The Reformation: Archdeacon of St Andrews: 4 Commendator of Dunfermline Abbey, 1560. 11 Public life, 1561-7: Mary Queen of Scots. 19 111 The Regencies to the fall of Morton 1567-78 (a) Moray 1567-70 24 (b) Lennox 1570-01 30 (c) Mar 1571-02 36 (d) Morton 1572-08 39 IV James VI to Raid of Ruthven 1578-82 45 V Raid of Ruthven 50 VI James VI, 1583-4, after Raid of Ruthven: 52 the thirty pieces of gold: Commendator’s Last Days VII Dunfermline Abbey 58 VIII Conclusion and Epitaph 61 Portrait illustrations from History of Scotland Vol. 1 & 2. 3 CHAPTER 1 THE REFORMATION: ARCHDEACON ST ANDREWS: Towards the end of July 1560 George Durie, Abbot of Dunfermline, sixty- four years of age, went privily over the water from Fife and sought refuge in the Castle of Dunbar. It was then held by French soldiers who were soon to go home in consequence of a peace signed between the Catholic (and French) party and the Protestant (and English) party in that period of Scottish Civil War. A messenger at arms was seeking him with a summons from the Protestant Lords to compeir before the Council to answer accusations laid against him for his behaviour in Fife.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LIFE of JOHN KNOX by Thomas M’Crie
    THE LIFE OF JOHN KNOX by Thomas M’Crie Champions of Truth Ministry www.champs-of-truth.com 2 THE LIFE OF JOHN KNOX BY THOMAS M’CRIE 3 PREFACE The Reformation from popery marks an epoch unquestionably the most important in the history of modern Europe. The effects of the change which it produced, in religion, in manners, in politics, and in literature, continue to be felt at the present day. Nothing, surely, can be more interesting than an investigation of the history of that period, and of those men who were the instruments, under Providence, of accomplishing a revolution which has proved so beneficial to mankind. Though many able writers have employed their talents in tracing the causes and consequences of the Reformation, and though the leading facts respecting its progress in Scotland have been repeatedly stated, it occurred to me that the subject was by no means exhausted. I was confirmed in this opinion by a more minute examination of the ecclesiastical history of this country, which I began for my own satisfaction several years ago. While I was pleased at finding that there existed such ample materials for illustrating the history of the Scottish Reformation, I could not but regret that no one had undertaken to digest and exhibit the information on this subject which lay hid in manuscripts, and in books which are now little known or consulted. Not presuming, however, that I had the ability or the leisure requisite for executing a task of such difficulty and extent, I formed the design of drawing up memorials of our national Reformer, in which his personal history might be combined with illustrations of the progress of that great undertaking, in the advancement of which he acted so conspicuous a part.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven J. Reid Phd Thesis
    EDUCATION IN POST-REFORMATION SCOTLAND: ANDREW MELVILLE AND THE UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS, 1560-1606 Steven J. Reid A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St. Andrews 2008 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/849 This item is protected by original copyright Steven John Reid Education in Post-Reformation Scotland: Andrew Melville and the University of St Andrews, 1560-1606 A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in History at the University of St Andrews August 2008 i Abstract Andrew Melville (1545-1622) was the leader of the Presbyterian wing of the Scottish Kirk between 1574 and 1607, and he and his colleagues were a perpetual irritant to James VI and I in his attempts to establish a royal and Episcopal dominance over the Kirk. Yet much of Melville’s reputation has been based on the seventeenth-century Presbyterian historical narratives written by the likes of James Melville (Andrew’s nephew) and David Calderwood. These partisan accounts formed the basis of modern historiography in Thomas M’Crie’s monumentally influential Life of Andrew Melville . Modern historians broadly agree that Melville’s portrayal as a powerful and decisive church leader in these narratives is greatly exaggerated, and that he was at best an influential voice in the Kirk who was quickly marginalised by the adult James VI. However, only James Kirk has commented at any length on Melville’s other role in Jacobean Scotland—that of developing and reforming the Scottish universities.
    [Show full text]