DOCSLIB.ORG

IN WALLACHIA and MOLDAVIA (1780S1850S)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AT THE END OF EMPIRE: IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE, INTER-IMPERIAL RIVALRY AND “AUTONOMY” IN WALLACHIA AND MOLDAVIA (1780s-1850s) BY STEFANIA COSTACHE DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Maria Todorova, Chair and Director of Research Professor Keith Hitchins Associate Professor John Randolph Associate Professor Christine Philliou, Columbia University Abstract This dissertation recreates the biography of several power holders in Wallachia and Moldavia to explore how local, imperial and inter-imperial politics interacted on this Ottoman borderland between the 1780s and 1850s and promoted European imperialist aims in the Ottoman Empire. For this purpose, it provides an analysis of Ottoman rule on a borderland inhabited by a Christian population and located near two Christian empires, the Habsburg and the Russian, the latter of which pursued an active expansionist policy against the Ottoman Empire. It also explores the interplay between the politics of local power holders who aimed to enhance their position and the forms of political intervention that the competing European empires deployed to exert control over the Ottoman Empire in contraction. It suggests that the major turning point in the history of Ottoman imperial rule over this borderland occurred after the European powers devised formal agreements in the 1830s to formally create the notions of European protection of the Ottoman Empire, of restricted Ottoman rule in the Christian Balkan dominions and of local “autonomous” governments, which accommodated the elites on site. The study is divided in four chapters that retrace the interaction of local and imperial interests on the borderland during the Russian-Habsburg-Ottoman wars of 1787-1791/1792, the Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815), and the Russian-Ottoman war of 1828-1829. These chapters reveal the transformation of forms of European expansion against the Ottoman Empire, as tested on the Danube borderlands: from territorial annexation to diplomatic influence, imperial condominium and the creation of a body of international law pertaining to the Ottoman Empire. The analysis of the trade with land estates across the Ottoman-Habsburg-Russian borders between the 1780s and the 1810s, displays the complications that characterized territorial annexation as a form of European expansion against the Ottoman Empire. In this respect, the ii local power holders’ private businesses with land estates challenged the authority of the three empires on the borderland, prompting the imperial central administrations to acknowledge such businesses in order to substantiate their own territorial claims. A study of the information networks that the local power holders operated between the Ottoman, Russian and Habsburg Empires during a period of crisis for the Ottoman Empire, from the Napoleonic Wars until the Greek revolts, reveals how diplomacy on the borderland became an important instrument to promote and oppose European expansionism at the Porte. It also reveals how local elites used their role in the Ottoman diplomacy to survive the political changes that the Greek revolts triggered at Constantinople. The analysis of the local power holders’ involvement in the Russian- sponsored administration of the borderland between 1829 and 1840 explores how European powers competing for control over an Ottoman Empire in turmoil began to promote formal agreements to legitimize their authority in imperial affairs, restrict Ottoman power and co-opt local leaders. The examination of successive European formal definitions of Ottoman, local and international control in Wallachia and Moldavia and of changing local political agendas (1830s- 1850s) explores the continuities between competing European imperial projects in the Ottoman Empire and the elites’ promotion of a unified nation-state on the borderland. iii Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the advice and support of many people who have helped me through the challenges of pursuing a PhD degree. I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Maria Todorova for encouraging me to trust myself and my research and for patiently reading and commenting on my graduate papers, applications and dissertation chapters. The members of my dissertation have helped me tremendously during the research and writing stages of my project. Professor Keith Hitchins kindly allowed me to use his impressive collection of books in the history of Eastern Europe and suggested references thanks to which I could keep my research on track in the archives of Iassy and Bucharest. Professors Christine Philliou (Columbia University) and John Randolph offered invaluable feedback on my writing. Professors Maria Todorova, Christine Philliou and Andreas Lyberatos from the Institute for Mediterranean Studies helped me nuance my view of modern Ottoman history and Ottoman history in the Balkans. The graduate courses taught by Professors John Randolph and Clare Crownston provoked me to reflect to the broader, European dimension of my project. As a teaching assistant, I was inspired by Professor Carol Symes to think of history teaching as a means to improve my own research, by making it more accessible to non-historians. Professor David Sansone inspired me to study Modern Greek, which helped my archival research. My fellow students in the History Department at the University of Illinois provided their support throughout my stay at Urbana Champaign. I would also like to express my gratitude to the Romanian scholars and researchers with whom I discussed my dissertation and the archival resources available in Romania. During my visit to Iassy, I benefited from the advice of Professors Alexandru-Florin Platon, Cristian Ploscaru and Bogdan Maleon from the University of Iassy, and of Mihai Mârza at the Romanian iv National Archives of Iassy. While in Bucharest, I had the pleasure to discuss my project with Professors Viorel Panaite and Bogdan Murgescu and with Dr. Constanţa Vintilă-Ghiţulescu, researcher at the Nicolae Iorga Institute. I was also lucky to meet Dr. Tudor Berza, the descendent of one of the characters in my dissertation, who commented on the preliminary work for the last chapter. I also received valuable comments from Professors Christine Philliou, Virginia Aksan, Rossitsa Gradeva, specialists in Ottoman history, from Professor Mark Mazower, a specialist in Balkan history and from other scholars in these fields during workshops of Ottoman history at Columbia University and Central European University, the student conferences in Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Chicago and the conventions of the Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian studies and of the Association for the Study of Nationalities. The seminars and discussions at the New Europe College in Bucharest provided a great inter- disciplinary setting to present my work to young Romanian and international scholars. The staff members at the National Archives of Romania in Bucharest and Iassy and at the Austrian State Archives of Vienna made possible the timely completion of my archival research. Thanks to their kindness and solicitude I could tap on most of the sources I had planned to consult and to explore additional documents. I am also grateful for the long and short-term financial support that I received from the History Department at the University of Illinois, the American Society for 18 th Century Studies, the Open Society Institute, the New Europe College in Bucharest and the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. v My deepest thanks go to my family in Romania who encouraged me and took pride in my academic work, and to Antonis. More than anyone else, he believed that I could carry out this project and offered me his love through times, good and bad. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Buying and selling land on the Danube: wealth, Phanariot politics and inter-imperial rivalry in Moldavia, 1780s-1810s ................................................................................................. 30 Chapter 2: Trading news on the borderland: information networks in Wallachia, inter-imperial diplomacy and the negotiation of Ottoman affairs, 1800s-1820s ................................................. 72 Chapter 3: Running an imperial condominium on the borderland: local elites and the implementation of Russian imperial projects in Moldavia, 1820s-1840s................................... 116 Chapter 4: Politics at the end of empire: European expansion, “imperial suzerainty” and “national government” on the borderland, 1830s-1850s ............................................................ 157 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 198 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 204 APPENDIX A: Glossary............................................................................................................. 220 APPENDIX B: Family tree of the Rosetti-Roznovanus ............................................................. 225 APPENDIX C: Family tree Samurcas .......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Romanian Folk Magic: Bewitching Ideology Daniel Bird

    Romanian Folk Magic: Bewitching Ideology Daniel Bird

    Romanian Folk Magic: Bewitching Ideology Daniel Bird Potions swirling in cauldrons, midnight spells, curses and hidden covens: the witch is a fgure entrenched in our myth and memory. It is, however, a little-known fact that today many witches still reign supreme over parts of modern Europe, holding seats of power in lavish abodes. These supernatural practitioners have refused to be relegated to history and instead have transmogrifed their talents to ft into a capitalist arena where magic fourishes and their arts embed them- selves in an industry of their own. Associated most frequently in European memory with Satanic worship, witchcraft has held a curious grip on the human psyche. The archetype has surfaced world- wide in many cultural iterations, having even received a post-mortem resurgence and transformation in Western pop-culture flm and television. Witches in this medium have been portrayed equally as relatable adolescents and as the more traditionally horrifying hags of the thriller genre, showing the fgure of the witch to be a durable and fexible one. Much the same can be said of witchcraft in the country of Romania, where the practice and sociocultural perceptions of witch- craft have evolved, expired and been subsequently revived in the last century. To properly articulate the historical trajectory of Romanian witchcraft, I begin by describing its birthplace in the agrarian countryside. I then examine the strug- gles of the practice under the Romanian Communist system which sought to oppress this tradition. The discussion delineates the resurgence of the trade after 1989, and the Golden Age of witchcraft in the new neoliberal setting.
  • Romanian Foreign Policy (1878-1914)

    Romanian Foreign Policy (1878-1914)

    World Wide Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development WWJMRD 2017; 3(11): 69-74 www.wwjmrd.com International Journal Peer Reviewed Journal Romanian foreign policy (1878-1914) Refereed Journal Indexed Journal UGC Approved Journal Dragos Ionut ONESCU Impact Factor MJIF: 4.25 e-ISSN: 2454-6615 Abstract Prior to independence, Romania has conducted foreign policy actions aimed at achieving this Dragos Ionut ONESCU objective (see trade convention with Austria-Hungary in 1875) and after 1878 was sought to ensure Strasbourg University/Babes- Bolyai University Cluj- security through political alliances with neighboring countries and powers. One of the main foreign Napoca, Romania policy issues, with important consequences and the territorial integrity of the Romanian Principalities and then was the status of the Danube. In the present paper I analyzed the Romanian foreign policy between 1878 and 1914. Keywords: Romanian Foreign Policy, International Relations, Security, Foreign Policy Introduction The first time the issue is considered Danube is the Treaty of Bucharest between Russia and Turkey, signed on May 28, 1812, which ended the Russo-Turkish war took place between 1806 and 1812. The Clashes of interest between the major European powers were put on the agenda the need to solve the problem of freedom of navigation on international rivers and its consecration in an international act. Used the occasion to ensuring this was the Peace Congress in Vienna, met after the first abdication of Napoleon. The Final Act 1815 states in Articles 108-118, fundamental principles of river. Under Article 109, navigation on international rivers was free for all states without distinction between riparian and non-riparian states; is accurate but that freedom of navigation applies only to commercial navigation, not for the war.
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Greek Body in Crisis: Contemporary Dance as a Site of Negotiating and Restructuring National Identity in the Era of Precarity Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vg4w163 Author Zervou, Natalie Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Greek Body in Crisis: Contemporary Dance as a Site of Negotiating and Restructuring National Identity in the Era of Precarity A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Critical Dance Studies by Natalie Zervou June 2015 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Marta Elena Savigliano, Chairperson Dr. Linda J. Tomko Dr. Anthea Kraut Copyright Natalie Zervou 2015 The Dissertation of Natalie Zervou is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgments This dissertation is the result of four years of intensive research, even though I have been engaging with this topic and the questions discussed here long before that. Having been born in Greece, and having lived there till my early twenties, it is the place that holds all my childhood memories, my first encounters with dance, my friends, and my family. From a very early age I remember how I always used to say that I wanted to study dance and then move to the US to pursue my dream. Back then I was not sure what that dream was, other than leaving Greece, where I often felt like I did not belong. Being here now, in the US, I think I found it and I must admit that when I first begun my pursuit in graduate studies in dance, I was very hesitant to engage in research concerning Greece.
  • Analele Universităţii Din Craiova, Seria Istorie, Anul XIX, Nr. 2(26)/2014

    Analele Universităţii Din Craiova, Seria Istorie, Anul XIX, Nr. 2(26)/2014

    Analele Universităţii din Craiova, Seria Istorie, Anul XIX, Nr. 2(26)/2014 CONTENTS STUDIES AND ARTICLES Anișoara Băbălău, THE FISCAL ORGANISATION OF WALLACHIA IN BRANCOVAN ERA .................................................................................................................................. 5 Elena Steluţa Dinu, HEALTH LAWS IN THE PERIOD 1874-1910 .............................. 15 Adi Schwarz, THE STRUGGLE OF THE JEWS FOR THEIR POLITICAL RIGHTS IN THE VIEW OF WESTERN JOURNALISTS (1876-1914) ............................................. 23 Cosmin-Ştefan Dogaru, LE PORTRAIT DE CHARLES DE HOHENZOLLERN- SIGMARINGEN. UN REPERE DANS L’HISTOIRE DE L’ETAT ROUMAIN ............. 31 Stoica Lascu, THE SITUATION OF THE BALKAN ROMANIANS REFLECTED IN “REVISTA MACEDONIEI” MAGAZINE (BUCHAREST; 1905-1906) ...................... 43 Gheorghe Onişoru, MAY 15, 1943: DISSOLUTION OF THE KOMINTERN AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF ROMANIA .......................................... 75 Cezar Stanciu, CHALLENGES TO PROLETARIAN INTERNATIONALISM: THE COMMUNIST PARTIES’ CONFERENCE IN MOSCOW, 1969 .................................. 85 Lucian Dindirică, ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION OF ROMANIA UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF NICOLAE CEAUŞESCU ........................................... 101 Virginie Wanyaka Bonguen Oyongmen, ARMÉE CAMEROUNAISE ET DÉVELOPPEMENT ÉCONOMIQUE ET SOCIAL DE LA NATION: LE CAS DU GÉNIE MILITAIRE (1962-2012) ................................................................................ 109 Nicolae Melinescu, THE MARITIME
  • BRIEF HISTORY of the ROMANIAN PEOPLE Romania Has Its Unique Culture, Which Is the Product of Its Geography and of Its Distinct H

    BRIEF HISTORY of the ROMANIAN PEOPLE Romania Has Its Unique Culture, Which Is the Product of Its Geography and of Its Distinct H

    BRIEF HISTORY OF THE ROMANIAN PEOPLE Romania has its unique culture, which is the product of its geography and of its distinct historical evolution. Like Romanians themselves, it is fundamentally defined as the meeting point of three regions: Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and the Balkans, but cannot be truly included in any of them. The Romanian identity formed on a substratum of mixed Roman and quite possibly Dacian elements, with many other influences. During late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, the major influences came from the Slavic peoples who migrated and settled in near Romania; from medieval Greeks, and the Byzantine Empire; from a long domination by the Ottoman Empire; from the Hungarians; and from the Germans living in Transylvania. Modern Romanian culture emerged and developed over roughly the last 250 years under a strong influence from Western culture, particularly French , and German culture. The Romanian literature began to truly evolve with the revolutions of 1848 and the union of the two Danubian Principalities in 1859. The Origin of the Romanians began to be discussed and in Transylvania and Romanian scholars began studying in France, Italy and Germany. The German philosophy and French culture were integrated into modern Romanian literature and a new elite of artists led to the appearance of some of the classics of the Romanian literature such as Mihai Eminescu, George Coşbuc, Ioan Slavici. Although they remain little known outside Romania, they are very appreciated within Romania for giving birth to a true Romanian literature by creating modern lyrics with inspiration from the old folklore tales. Of them, Eminescu is considered the most important and influential Romanian poet, and is still very much loved for his creations, and especially the poem Luceafărul – The Evening Star – the longest love poem in the world.
  • The Romanian Colony in Constantinople at the End of the 19Th Century

    The Romanian Colony in Constantinople at the End of the 19Th Century

    Silvana Rachieru ISSN 0353-295X (Tisak) 1849-0344 (Online) UDK 94(560.118=135.1)“18“(091) Radovi - Zavod za hrvatsku povijest Izvorni znanstveni rad Vol. 51, br. 1, Zagreb 2019 Primljeno: 20. 11. 2019. Prihvaćeno: 21. 12. 2019. DOI: 10.17234/RadoviZHP.51.4 Between the King and the Sultan: the Romanian Colony in Constantinople at the End of the 19th Century The article focuses on certain results of a long-term research project which addresses a very specific aspect concerning Romanian-Ottoman relations after 1878: Romanian subjects, residents of the Ottoman Empire, perceived as a community under the pro- tection of the diplomatic and consular missions of Romania. The present contribution accords particular attention to the definition of this community and the legal status of the members of the colony registered with Romanian consulates in the imperial capital. A brief discussion of their ethno-religious profile and socio-economic char- acteristics is also included in the analysis. This is the first attempt to analyse several aspects concerning the Romanian multiethnic colony in Constantinople from different perspectives, such as occupations, nationality papers or the major problems which in- fluenced their status as foreign residents in the Ottoman Empire. The primary sources of data are the consular registers and correspondence between representatives of the Romanian state and the Ministry of the Foreign Affairs, with a special focus on the analysis of an unpublished volume of documents, no. 422, “Registration,” and dated 1867-1916, from the Romanian Diplomatic Archives, Constantinople fonds. Other alternative sources were also used, such as censuses, newspapers and memoirs, in order to reconstruct an image of the Romanian colony in Constantinople up to 1900.
  • Albanian Families' History and Heritage Making at the Crossroads of New

    Albanian Families' History and Heritage Making at the Crossroads of New

    Voicing the stories of the excluded: Albanian families’ history and heritage making at the crossroads of new and old homes Eleni Vomvyla UCL Institute of Archaeology Thesis submitted for the award of Doctor in Philosophy in Cultural Heritage 2013 Declaration of originality I, Eleni Vomvyla confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature 2 To the five Albanian families for opening their homes and sharing their stories with me. 3 Abstract My research explores the dialectical relationship between identity and the conceptualisation/creation of history and heritage in migration by studying a socially excluded group in Greece, that of Albanian families. Even though the Albanian community has more than twenty years of presence in the country, its stories, often invested with otherness, remain hidden in the Greek ‘mono-cultural’ landscape. In opposition to these stigmatising discourses, my study draws on movements democratising the past and calling for engagements from below by endorsing the socially constructed nature of identity and the denationalisation of memory. A nine-month fieldwork with five Albanian families took place in their domestic and neighbourhood settings in the areas of Athens and Piraeus. Based on critical ethnography, data collection was derived from participant observation, conversational interviews and participatory techniques. From an individual and family group point of view the notion of habitus led to diverse conceptions of ethnic identity, taking transnational dimensions in families’ literal and metaphorical back- and-forth movements between Greece and Albania.
  • The Reception of Isaac Newton in Europe

    The Reception of Isaac Newton in Europe

    The Reception of I THE RECEPTION OF ISAAC NEWTON IN EUROPE LANGUAGE COMMUNITIES, REGIONS AND COUNTRIES: THE GEOGRAPHY OF NEWTONIANISM Edited by Helmut Pulte and Scott Mandelbrote BLOOMSBURY ACADEM I C LO:-IDON • NEW YORK• OXt"ORD • NEW DELHI • SYDNEY BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC Bloomsbury Publishing Pie 50 Bedford Square, London, WC 1B 3DP. UK 1385 Broadway, NewYork, NY 10018, USA BLOOMSBURY, BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Pie First published in Great Britain 2019 Reprinted in 2019 Copyright© Helmut Pulte, Scott Mandelbrote and Contributors, 2019 Helmut Pulte, Scott Mandelbrote and Contributors have asserted their rights under the Copyright. Designs and Pat~nts Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. For legal purposes the Acknowledgements on pp. xv, 199 constitute an extension of this copyright page. Cover design: Eleanor Rose All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Bloomsbury Publishing Pie does not have any control over, or responsibility for, any third-party websites referred to or in this book. All internet addresses given in this book were correct at the time of going to press. The author and publisher regret any inconvenience caused if addresses have changed or sites have ceased to exist, but can accept no responsibility for any such changes. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress.
  • 264645206.Pdf

    264645206.Pdf

    O şcoal ă româneasc ă de tradi ţie - Colegiul Na ţional «I.L.Caragiale » Scurt ă prezentare la 115 ani de la înfiin ţare Director prof. Gabriela B ăncil ă Spre sfârşitul secolului al XIX-lea, în pagina inc ă alb ă pe care se va scrie viitorul ţă rii, condi ţiile de dup ă realizarea Unirii Ţă rilor nu o vom l ăsa în voia cânturilor, ci cu mâini Române şi cucerirea independen ţei de stat, ca părinte şti vom insemna pe ea, dinainte, printr-o urmare a evolu ţiei rapide a societ ăţ ii române şti educa ţie curat ă, na ţional ă, tot ceea ce poate spre capitalism, s-a dezvoltat o re ţea de şcoli asigura într-o zi prop ăş irea şi prosperitatea necesar ă preg ătirii de cadre didactice pentru patriei. « Sciinta si patrie » va fi devisa acestei înv ăţă mântul primar, secundar şi superior. şcoli. » Cerin ţele de emancipare ale noii societ ăti Directorul şcolii, domnul Ion Zalomit a burgheze au f ăcut posibil ă întemeierea de c ătre adresat elevilor câteva cuvinte, atr ăgându-le Ministerul Cultelor şi Instruc ţiunii Publice a dou ă aten ţia c ă « toate cheltuielile ce le face statul vor şcoli normale superioare: una la Bucure şti (pentru fi zadarnice dac ă ei nu vor lucra cu sensibilitate şi sec ţiunea literar ă) şi a uneia la Ia şi (pentru str ăduin ţa şi nu se vor recomanda printr-o sec ţiunea ştiintific ă). În Monitorul Oficial din 31 conduit ă exemplar ă ». decembrie 1880/12 ianuarie 1881 la pag.
  • Studia Translatorica Vol. 10

    Studia Translatorica Vol. 10

    DOI: 10.23817/strans.10-28 Diana Cărburean Independent researcher/ Romania The Byzantine legal standard transposition strategies into the Romanian regulatory texts of the 17th century Abstract The Byzantine legal standard transposition strategies into the Romanian regulatory texts of the 17th century Unlike the Canon law texts available in the Romanian principalities – Moldavia and Wal- lachia – falling under the Slavic influence, the first legal acts which are subscribed to the secular law and which appear in 1646 [Carte Românească de Învățătură (en. Romanian Book of Learning) or Pravila lui Vasile Lupu (en. Vasile Lupu’s Code of Laws)] and in 1652 [Îndrep- tarea legii (en. The Law’s Rectification) orPravila lui Matei Basarab (en. Matei Basarab’s Code of Laws)] fall under the Greek-Byzantine influence. The present article aims to provide some information regarding the translation mechanisms applied by the Moldavian and Wallachian scholars of the 17th century who aimed at transposing the Byzantine Legal Standard to the everyday life of the two above mentioned Romanian principalities by means of fundamental procedures, such as “analysis (with the underlying meaning determination), transfer, restruc- turing, and testing” (Nida, 2004: 85) of the source message. The most precious information related to the translation process of those times is provided by the cases of untranslatability generated by the legal and terminological gap between the Receiver and the Transmitter. The identification and classification of these cases, but also the highlighting of the solutions the translator found to solve them, represent important steps in understanding the equivalenting process of two unequal legal systems that took place centuries ago in Eastern Europe, as illus- trated by the case of the two Romanian principalities and the Greek-Byzantine one.
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate

    1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate

    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
  • Two Greek Revolutions

    Two Greek Revolutions

    TWO GREEK REVOLUTIONS Greek nationalism under the Turkish yoke was nourished and sustained from three sources. One, the purest, was the Orthodox faith: since the Gospel and most of the patristic writings were written in Greek, a good knowledge of Orthodoxy required a good knowledge of Greek and Byzantine history in which Hellenism, the patriotic belief in the greatness of the Greek nation, was linked inseparably with its confession of the Orthodox faith. This Greek Orthodox nationalism (with the emphasis on “Orthodox”) was to be found especially among the monks of Mount Athos. Another source was a natural desire to be liberated from the Ottoman yoke. The situation of the Greeks in the Ottoman Empire was very difficult. As time passed and Ottoman power weakened, persecution of the faith increased. “The rights of the patriarch,” writes Fr. Alexander Schmemann, “were gradually reduced to nothing; all that was left to him was the ‘right’ of being responsible for the Christians. In the course of seventy-three years in the eighteenth century, the patriarch was replaced forty-eight times! Some were deposed and reinstalled as many as five times; many were put to torture. The rebellions of the Janissaries were accompanied by terrible bloodshed. Churches were defiled, relics cut to pieces, and the Holy Gifts profaned. Christian pogroms became more and more frequent. In the nineteenth century Turkey was simply rotting away, but the ‘sick man of Europe’ was supported at all points by other nations in opposition to Russia,”1 the only real protector of the Orthodox in the Ottoman empire.