Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America Fabrizio Ferraro1, Kerem Gurses2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America Fabrizio Ferraro1, Kerem Gurses2 European Management Review (2009) 6, 233–249 & 2009 EURAM Palgrave Macmillan. All rights reserved 1740-4754/09 palgrave-journals.com/emr/ Building architectural advantage in the US motion picture industry: Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America Fabrizio Ferraro1, Kerem Gurses2 1Strategic Management, IESE Business School, Barcelona, Spain; 2BES La Salle University, Barcelona, Spain Correspondence: Fabrizio Ferraro, Strategic Management, IESE Business School, Avda. Pearson 21, Barcelona 8034, Spain. Tel: þ 34 93 253 64 83; Fax: þ 34 93 253 43 43; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article contributes to the literature on industry architecture by identifying the conditions that enable the emergence of architectural advantage. To understand how one firm can shape the industry architecture in its favor, we analyzed a historical case study on the role of Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America (MCA) in the evolution of the motion picture industry in the United States. We focusedCOPY on two major disruptive events: the 1948 Paramount Decree which forced vertically integrated movie studios to divest their theaters, and the explosion of television as a new form of entertainment in the 1950s which became an alternative for exhibiting movies. In both these cases, one company, MCA, managed to improve substantially its standing by occupying and consolidating a position of advantage in the industry or, in other terms, an ‘architectural advantage’. We show how in both cases this was the result of interactions between the Studios, constrained by the institutional logic of the industry, the regulatory framework, and MCA’s introduction of novel practices. The latter consolidated its grip on talents and facilitated the growth of independent production and TV production. European Management Review (2009) 6, 233–249. doi:10.1057/emr.2009.24 Keywords: architectural advantage; industry practices; industry evolution; institutional theory; motion picture industry AUTHOR Introduction n addressing the critical question of industry evolution, of labor in the industry and the related distribution of three research traditions, industrial organization (Bain, value. The process through which firms can achieve an I 1968; Porter, 1980; Gort and Klepper, 1982; McGahan, architectural advantage is a fertile ground for empirical and 2004), institutional and evolutionary economics (Nelson theoretical work, given that much existing research has and Winter, 1982; Teece, 1986; Langlois and Robertson, focused on the consequences of exogenous shocks (for 1995; Jacobides, 2005), and institutional theory (Haveman instance, technical innovation or regulatory change). Such and Rao, 1997; Thornton and Ocasio, 1999; Lounsbury, 2007), a focus obscures the mechanisms that guide the emergence have helped us understand antecedents and consequences of of novel industry structure in the wake of a shock as well structural changes in industries. Nevertheless, most studies as the role that incumbents’ actions play. in these traditions did not specify how the ‘rules and roles’ From 1939 until 1965 Lew Wasserman and his company, that shape division of labor in the industry emerge and Music Corporation of America (MCA), managed to change change. the competitive landscape of the motion picture industry The concept of ‘industry architecture’ (Jacobides et al., in the United States completely. They exploited technological 2006) provides a useful conceptual tool to explore the role and regulatory change and until the 1980s wielded enormous of technical and institutional forces in shaping the division influence. Here we analyze this fascinating historical case, Building architectural advantage Fabrizio Ferraro and Kerem Gurses 234 tracking the relations between exogenous environmental the processes leading to the conditions necessary for market shocks and organizational choices to further our under- emergence: coordination simplification, and information standing of how architectural advantage emerges. standardization. In a study of the British building industry, The article is organized as follows. First, we provide a Cacciatori and Jacobides (2005) found that the vertical short overview of the relevant academic literature on division of labor affected the knowledge base of each segment industry evolution and architecture. Then, after describing of the industry, and established the trajectories for capability the methods and our data sources, we delve into the rich development. These studies help us better characterize the historical narrative of the evolving motion picture industry co-evolution of industry boundaries and firm capabilities in the United States and of MCA’s rise to power and industry (Jacobides and Winter, 2005) and clearly state that industry dominance. In the last section, we interpret our findings, participants are actively trying to change the industry: outlining the contour of our contribution and discussing its ‘exogenous factors did not shape this value chain, but rather, managerial and policy implications. the conscious, even if occasionally myopic, efforts of industry participants and potential entrants shaped it’ (Jacobides, 2005: 490). Nevertheless, these studies were narrowly focused on the Theoretical background issue of scope identification, and the question of how novel Economists, sociologists and strategic management scholars rules of the game emerge in an industry was not central to have explored industry evolution from different perspec- their efforts. tives, and provided interesting insights on this process. In From a sociological perspective, institutional theory economics the Industrial Organization tradition (Bain, 1968; might help us better understand where industry rules and Porter, 1980) mainly focused on the structural and technical roles come from, by shifting our focus towards a new unit features of industries as determinants of their participants’ of analysis: organizational fields. It also introduced the profitability. In this tradition scholars have shown how concept of institutional logics (Friedland and Alford, 1991): exogenous factors such as the number of potential entrants, the rules of the game that industry players follow and take- the growth rate of incumbent firms, and the ease of imitation for-granted, and the cultural and institutional antecedents of incumbent firms will influence the structure of the industry of such rules (Hirsch and Lounsbury, 1997; Thornton and (Gort and Klepper, 1982; Klepper and Graddy, 1990) and Ocasio, 1999). how technological innovation affects industry concentration DiMaggio and Powell (1983) define an organizational field (Geroski and Pomroy, 1990). More recently scholars have as ‘those organizations that, in the aggregate, constitute a developed fully endogenous models of industry evolution recognizedCOPY area of institutional life: key suppliers, resource (Klepper, 1996, 2002) but despite the acknowledgement that and product consumers, regulatory agencies, and other firms could and should attempt to influence the structure of organizations that produce similar services or products’ their industries, this research tradition has not explored how (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983: 148). This shift in the unit of changes in the rules of the game can transform competitive analysis goes beyond the traditional industry boundaries dynamics in the industry, and lead to the emergence of employed by both economists and population ecologists entirely new industries. Furthermore, it has not provided (Hannan and Freeman, 1977). The shift also helped much theoretical insight on how to do so (see Geroski (2003) researchers focus on the role of actors so far neglected, and McGahan (2004) for an exception). In the evolutionary such as regulators (Schneiberg and Soule, 2005); social economics tradition (Nelson and Winter, 1982), technological movements (Rao, 1998; Lounsbury et al., 2003; King and changecanhavedramaticimpactonthedevelopmentof Soule, 2007; Sine and Lee, 2009); professions (Marquis industry structure and provides a necessary causal link in the and Lounsbury, 2007); and local communities (Marquis and co-evolution of firms and industry (Murmann, 2003). Malerba Battilana, forthcoming). While most early work in this et al. (2008) suggest that a key factorAUTHOR in explaining changes in literature emphasized the consequences of institutional the vertical scope of firms is the process of accumulating changes, but did not provide much opportunity for agency, capabilities at the firm and industry levels. Another example this initial bias has been challenged by organizational of interactions between firm-level processes and industry-level theorists. Employing the concept of institutional entrepre- dynamics is given by Feldman and Romanelli (2006), who neurship (DiMaggio, 1991), some researchers emphasized studied biotechnology regional clusters in the United States the need for a triggering event that leads to change between 1976 and 2002. They showed that the key factor (Greenwood et al., 2002; Sine and David, 2003). Variously driving the growth of these clusters was the proportion of referred to as ‘shocks’ (Fligstein, 1991) or ‘jolts’ (Meyer, firms founded by former employees of established bio- 1982), such unsettling events create disruptive uncertainty therapeutics firms (breakaway firms). Despite their important for individual organizations, forcing some to initiate contributions, these studies do not explain how the division unconventional experiments upon established practice. of
Recommended publications
  • How the Mob and the Movie Studios Sold out the Hollywood Labor Movement and Set the Stage for the Blacklist
    TRUE-LIFE NOIR How the Mob and the movie studios sold out the Hollywood labor movement and set the THE CHICAGO WAY stage for the Blacklist Alan K. Rode n the early 1930s, Hollywood created an indelible image crooked law enforcement, infected numerous American shook down businesses to maintain labor peace. Resistance The hard-drinking Browne was vice president of the Local of the urban gangster. It is a pungent irony that, less than metropolises—but Chicago was singularly venal. Everything by union officials was futile and sometimes fatal. At least 13 2 Stagehands Union, operated under the umbrella of IATSE a decade later, the film industry would struggle to escape and everybody in the Windy City was seemingly for sale. Al prominent Chicago labor leaders were killed; and not a single (The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, the vise-like grip of actual gangsters who threatened to Capone’s 1931 federal tax case conviction may have ended his conviction for any criminals involved.Willie Bioff and George Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts, here- bring the movie studios under its sinister control. reign as “Mr. Big,” but his Outfit continued to grow, exerting Browne were ambitious wannabes who vied for a place at after referred to as the IA). He had run unsuccessfully for the Criminal fiefdoms, created by an unholy trinity its dominion over various trade unions. Mobsters siphoned the union trough. Russian-born Bioff was a thug who served IA presidency in 1932. Bioff and Browne recognized in each Iof Prohibition-era gangsters, ward-heeling politicians, and off workers’ dues, set up their cohorts with no-show jobs, and the mob as a union slugger, pimp, and whorehouse operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon's Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968
    Dark Quadrant: Organized Crime, Big Business, and the Corruption of American Democracy Online Appendix: Nixon’s Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968 By Jonathan Marshall “Though his working life has been passed chiefly on the far shores of the continent, close by the Pacific and the Atlantic, some emotion always brings Richard Nixon back to the Caribbean waters off Key Biscayne and Florida.”—T. H. White, The Making of the President, 19681 Richard Nixon, like millions of other Americans, enjoyed Florida and the nearby islands of Cuba and the Bahamas as refuges where he could leave behind his many cares and inhibitions. But he also returned again and again to the region as an important ongoing source of political and financial support. In the process, the lax ethics of its shadier operators left its mark on his career. This Sunbelt frontier had long attracted more than its share of sleazy businessmen, promoters, and politicians who shared a get-rich-quick spirit. In Florida, hustlers made quick fortunes selling worthless land to gullible northerners and fleecing vacationers at illegal but wide-open gambling joints. Sheriffs and governors protected bookmakers and casino operators in return for campaign contributions and bribes. In nearby island nations, as described in chapter 4, dictators forged alliances with US mobsters to create havens for offshore gambling and to wield political influence in Washington. Nixon’s Caribbean milieu had roots in the mobster-infested Florida of the 1940s. He was introduced to that circle through banker and real estate investor Bebe Rebozo, lawyer Richard Danner, and Rep. George Smathers. Later this chapter will explore some of the diverse connections of this group by following the activities of Danner during the 1968 presidential campaign, as they touched on Nixon’s financial and political ties to Howard Hughes, the South Florida crime organization of Santo Trafficante, and mobbed-up hotels and casinos in Las Vegas and Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Book
    Vegas at Odds Kraft, James P. Published by Johns Hopkins University Press Kraft, James P. Vegas at Odds: Labor Conflict in a Leisure Economy, 1960–1985. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.3451. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/3451 [ Access provided at 25 Sep 2021 14:41 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Vegas at Odds studies in industry and society Philip B. Scranton, Series Editor Published with the assistance of the Hagley Museum and Library Vegas at Odds Labor Confl ict in a Leisure Economy, 1960– 1985 JAMES P. KRAFT The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore © 2010 The Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved. Published 2010 Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper 2 4 6 8 9 7 5 3 1 The Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Mary land 21218- 4363 www .press .jhu .edu Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Kraft, James P. Vegas at odds : labor confl ict in a leisure economy, 1960– 1985 / James P. Kraft. p. cm.—(Studies in industry and society) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN- 13: 978- 0- 8018- 9357- 5 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN- 10: 0- 8018- 9357- 7 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Labor movement— Nevada—Las Vegas— History—20th century. 2. Labor— Nevada—Las Vegas— History—20th century. 3. Las Vegas (Nev.)— Economic conditions— 20th century. I. Title. HD8085.L373K73 2009 331.7'6179509793135—dc22 2009007043 A cata log record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Dan Moldea Spells out an Alliance of the U.S. Left and FBI Against Reagan
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 8, Number 25, June 23, 1981 created by small business. You are all acquainted with I, the 20 percent prime rate. It is breaking the backs of small businessmen. I for one don't believe that [Federal Reserve Chairman] Volcker is correct." The caucus established subcommittees on taxation, capital forma­ tion, trade, regulatory reform, and-to appeal to royal­ ty owners-independent energy. Secondly, an Agricultural and Rural Development Forum was convened after the DNC meeting ad­ journed. The forum featured New Mexico Gov. Bruce King, a rancher, Rep. Glenn English of Oklahoma, and Dan out former House Agriculture Committee Chairman Tom Moldea spells Foley of Washington State. U.S. and FBI At this meeting, 100 farmers, some of whom admit­ the left ted voting for Reagan, constructively attacked Demo­ cratic incompetence. American Agriculture Movement Dan Moldea, best known as the author of the anti-Team­ leader Harvey Gardner of Oklahoma, addressing Rep. ster book The Hoffa Wars, has predicted "a major organ­ English, said, "It is all well and good to talk about ized crime scandal involving top Reagan administration gasohol ... but farmers can't make it because they can't figures," and called on the left to openly ally with the borrow money." In addition, participants discussed the Carter holdovers in the Justice Department against 1981 farm bill, predicting low prices and large surpluses. "organized crime" -linked administration officials, Teams­ Parity will be under 60 percent of the cost of production. ters, and congressmen. Bob Rauner, president of the Nebraska Wheatgrowers Moldea appeared at the Washington headquarters of Association, noted that parity prices contribute to a the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) on May 28 to address balanced budget by creating a tax base.
    [Show full text]
  • 0813122023.Pdf
    Engulfed Page ii Blank ? Engulfed The Death of Paramount Pictures and the Birth of Corporate Hollywood BERNARD F. DICK THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 2001 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508–4008 05 04 03 02 01 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dick, Bernard F. Engulfed: the death of Paramount Pictures and the birth of corporate Hollywood / Bernard F. Dick. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8131-2202-3 (cloth : acid-free paper) 1. Paramount Pictures Corporation–History. 2. Title. PN1999.P3 D53 2001 384'.8’06579494 00012276 This book is printed on acid-free recycled paper meeting the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence in Paper for Printed Library Materials. Manufactured in the United States of America. Contents Preface ix 1 Mountain Glory 1 2 Mountain Gloom 44 3 Barbarians at the Spanish Gate 85 4 Charlie’s Boys 109 5 The Italian Connection 126 6 The Diller Days 149 7 Goodbye, Charlie 189 8 Sumner at the Summit 206 Epilogue 242 End Titles 245 Notes 247 Index 259 Photo insert follows page 125 Page vi Blank For Katherine Page viii Blank Preface In Mel Brooks’s Silent Movie (1977), Sid Caesar nearly has a heart attack when he learns that a megaconglomerate called “Engulf and Devour” has designs on his little studio.
    [Show full text]
  • American Auteur Cinema: the Last – Or First – Great Picture Show 37 Thomas Elsaesser
    For many lovers of film, American cinema of the late 1960s and early 1970s – dubbed the New Hollywood – has remained a Golden Age. AND KING HORWATH PICTURE SHOW ELSAESSER, AMERICAN GREAT THE LAST As the old studio system gave way to a new gen- FILMFILM FFILMILM eration of American auteurs, directors such as Monte Hellman, Peter Bogdanovich, Bob Rafel- CULTURE CULTURE son, Martin Scorsese, but also Robert Altman, IN TRANSITION IN TRANSITION James Toback, Terrence Malick and Barbara Loden helped create an independent cinema that gave America a different voice in the world and a dif- ferent vision to itself. The protests against the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights movement and feminism saw the emergence of an entirely dif- ferent political culture, reflected in movies that may not always have been successful with the mass public, but were soon recognized as audacious, creative and off-beat by the critics. Many of the films TheThe have subsequently become classics. The Last Great Picture Show brings together essays by scholars and writers who chart the changing evaluations of this American cinema of the 1970s, some- LaLastst Great Great times referred to as the decade of the lost generation, but now more and more also recognised as the first of several ‘New Hollywoods’, without which the cin- American ema of Francis Coppola, Steven Spiel- American berg, Robert Zemeckis, Tim Burton or Quentin Tarantino could not have come into being. PPictureicture NEWNEW HOLLYWOODHOLLYWOOD ISBN 90-5356-631-7 CINEMACINEMA ININ ShowShow EDITEDEDITED BY BY THETHE
    [Show full text]
  • John Cassavetes
    Cassavetes on Cassavetes Ray Carney is Professor of Film and American Studies and Director of the undergraduate and graduate Film Studies programs at Boston Uni- versity. He is the author or editor of more than ten books, including the critically acclaimed John Cassavetes: The Adventure of Insecurity; The Films of Mike Leigh: Embracing the World; The Films of John Cas- savetes: Pragmatism, Modernism, and the Movies; American Vision: The Films of Frank Capra; Speaking the Language of Desire: The Films of Carl Dreyer; American Dreaming; and the BFI monograph on Cas- savetes’ Shadows. He is an acknowledged expert on William James and pragmatic philosophy, having contributed major essays on pragmatist aesthetics to Morris Dickstein’s The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture and Townsend Ludington’s A Modern Mosaic: Art and Modernism in the United States. He co- curated the Beat Culture and the New America show for the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York, is General Editor of the Cam- bridge Film Classics series, and is a frequent speaker at film festivals around the world. He is regarded as one of the world’s leading authori- ties on independent film and American art and culture, and has a web site with more information at www.Cassavetes.com. in the same series woody allen on woody allen edited by Stig Björkman almodóvar on almodóvar edited by Frédéric Strauss burton on burton edited by Mark Salisbury cronenberg on cronenberg edited by Chris Rodley de toth on de toth edited by Anthony Slide fellini on
    [Show full text]
  • Banker Manatt and Hollywood's Mafia
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 11, Number 27, July 17, 1984 Manatt and Mondale are moral degenerates, individuals whose personal lives make them easily susceptible to the kind of sexual and other blackmail in which the KGB specializes. Corruption and moral pathology The current crop of Democratic Party presidential con­ Banker Manatt and tenders-apart from dark horse candidate Lyndon La­ Rouche, the challenger to the corrupt Democratic machine­ by Kathleen Klenetsky exemplifies the process of moral degeneration which has grippedthe party.Gary Hart is a reputed wife-beater and bed­ hopper whose lies about his true name and age point to a In the summ�r of 1981, shortly after Charles Manatt spent pathological personality. Jesse Jackson's organizations have over $75,000 to buy himself the Democratic National chair­ received money from Libya, one of the major promoters of manship, he announced that he had reached an agreement to international terrorism. This, not conviction, explains why sell his bank, First Los Angeles, to the Istituto San Paolo di Jackson himself has dragged his feet in censuring thug worker Torino. Under the agreement, Manatt revealed, he and his Louis Farrakhan,despite his repeated anti-SemitiC outbursts. law partner, Alan Rothenberg, would retain their director­ But neither Hart nor Jackson holds a candle to Fritz when ships of the bank. it comes to moral turpitude. The man first in line to get the This was the first U.S. bank acquired by the huge Istituto Democratic presidential nomination has a personal and polit­ San Paolo, and there was plenty of speculation as to why it ical history which might suit him for the Babylonian priest­ would pay over $60 million to acquire First Los Angeles hood, but certainly not for the White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism and Monopoly in the Motion Picture Industry
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-19-2020 Neoliberalism and Monopoly in the Motion Picture Industry Michael S. Wartenbe Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the American Politics Commons, International Economics Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Political Economy Commons Recommended Citation Wartenbe, Michael S., "Neoliberalism and Monopoly in the Motion Picture Industry" (2020). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4417. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/4417 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida NEOLIBERALISM AND MONOPOLY IN THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY A d issertati on s ubm. itt ed in par tia l fulf illm en t of the requireme nt s for the deg ree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by Michael Wartenbe 2020 To: Dean John F. Stack, Jr. Steven J. Green School of International & Public Affairs This dissertation, written by Michael Wartenbe, and entitled Neoliberalism and Monopoly in the Motion Picture Industry, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. ________________________________________ Gail Hollander ________________________________________ Jin Zeng ________________________________________ Clement Fatovic ________________________________________ Ronald Cox, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 19, 2020 This dissertation of Michael Wartenbe is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Studio System and Conglomerate Hollywood
    TCHC01 6/22/07 02:16 PM Page 11 PART I THE STRUCTURE OF THE INDUSTRY TCHC01 6/22/07 02:16 PM Page 12 TCHC01 6/22/07 02:16 PM Page 13 CHAPTER 1 THE STUDIO SYSTEM AND CONGLOMERATE HOLLYWOOD TOM SCHATZ Introduction In August 1995 Neal Gabler, an astute Hollywood observer, wrote an op-ed piece for The New York Times entitled “Revenge of the Studio System” in response to recent events that, in his view, signaled an industry-wide transformation (Gabler 1995). The previous year had seen the Seagram buyout of MCA-Universal, Time Warner’s purchase of the massive Turner Broadcasting System, and the launch of Dream- Works, the first new movie studio since the classical era. Then on August 1 came the bombshell that provoked Gabler’s editorial. Disney announced the acquisition of ABC and its parent conglomerate, Cap Cities, in a $19 billion deal – the second- largest merger in US history, which created the world’s largest media company. Disney CEO Michael Eisner also disclosed a quarter-billion-dollar deal with Mike Ovitz of Hollywood’s top talent agency, Creative Artists, to leave CAA and run the Disney empire. For Gabler, the Disney deals confirmed “a fundamental shift in the balance of power in Hollywood – really the third revolution in the relationship between industry forces.” Revolution I occurred nearly a century before with the formation of the Hollywood studios and the creation of a “system” that enabled them to con- trol the movie industry from the 1920s through the 1940s. Revolution II came with the postwar rise of television and the dismantling of the studio system by the courts, which allowed a new breed of talent brokers, “most notably Lew Wasserman of the Music Corporation of America [MCA],” to usurp control of the film industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th National A&E Journalism Awards
    2014 SEVENTH ANNUAL Quincy Jones The Visionary Award NATIONAL ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT JOURNALISM AWARDS Nancy O’Dell The Luminary Award LOS ANGELES PRESS CLUB 7TH ANNUAL National Arts & Entertainment Journalism Awards Los Angeles Press Club Awards for Editorial Excellence in A non-profit organization with 501(c)(3) status Tax ID 01-0761875 2013 and 2014, Honorary Awards for 2014 4773 Hollywood Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90027 Phone: (323) 669-8081 LOS ANGELES PRESS CLUB’S Fax: (310) 464-3577 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lapressclub.org The Visionary Award For Humanitarian Work PRESS CLUB OFFICERS QUINCY JONES PRESIDENT: Robert Kovacik NBC4 SoCal In conversation with Robert Kovacik VICE PRESIDENT: Patt Morrison Los Angeles Times/KPCC Introduced by Tina Sinatra TREASURER: Anthony Palazzo Bloomberg News Greg Gorman SECRETARY: Christina Villacorte Freelance The Luminary Award PUBLISHER: Gloria Zuurveen Pace News For Career Achievement EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Diana Ljungaeus N ANCY O’DELL International Journalist PRESIDENT EMERITUS: Jill Stewart Entertainment Tonight LA Weekly Introduced by Brad Bessey BOARD MEMBERS Barbara Gasser Hollywood Foreign Press Association Gabriel Kahn, USC Annenberg Fernando Mexia, Spanish EFE News Service Tony Pierce, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Your hosts: Adam J. Rose, Huffington Post Robert Kovacik, Dan Lauria and Carolina Sarassa, MundoFox Valerie Azlynn 43 NOMINATIONS Ben Sullivan, ScienceBlog.com LOS ANGELES PRESS CLUB 2014 NATIONAL ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT JOURNALISM AWARDS Brain Watt, KPCC HARONOR Y BOARD MEMBERS Alex Ben Block MORE NOMINATIONS Ted Johnson Will Lewis THAN ANY OTHER ENTERTAINMENT ADVISORY BOARD ORGANIZATION Eli Broad Ramona Ripston Sunday, November 23, 2014 Rick J. Caruso Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerry Pickman: “The Picture Worked.” Reminiscences of a Hollywood Publicist
    Jerry Pickman: “The Picture Worked.” Reminiscences of a Hollywood publicist HALL, Sheldon <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0950-7310> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/6808/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version HALL, Sheldon (2013). Jerry Pickman: “The Picture Worked.” Reminiscences of a Hollywood publicist. InMedia, 2013 (3). Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Jerry Pickman: “The Picture Worked” Reminiscences of a Hollywood publicist Edited and introduced by Sheldon Hall Contact details: Dr. Sheldon Hall Dept. of Stage and Screen Studies Room Owen 1130 Sheffield Hallam University Howard Street Sheffield S1 1WB Telephone: 0114 225 6224 Mobile: 07845 704 205 Email: [email protected] - 1 - Jerry Pickman: “The Picture Worked” Excerpts from the reminiscences of a Hollywood publicist Jerome (Jerry) Pickman (b. 24 August 1916; d. 18 November 2010) worked for more than fifty years in Hollywood film marketing and distribution. A native New Yorker, Pickman served as a reporter on the Brooklyn Eagle and other New York newspapers and took a law degree before entering show business as a publicist for Ted Lewis, Tommy Dorsey, and other musicians and bands. His association with the film industry began in 1944 through a chance meeting with the entertainer Eddie Cantor, who employed Pickman in a personal capacity before he joined the publicity department of Twentieth Century-Fox later that year.
    [Show full text]