Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

28763 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 83, No. 120 Thursday, June 21, 2018 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER information on the availability of this Comments contains regulatory documents having general material at the FAA, call 781–238–7759. applicability and legal effect, most of which We gave the public the opportunity to It is also available on the internet at participate in developing this final rule. are keyed to and codified in the Code of http://www.regulations.gov by searching Federal Regulations, which is published under The following presents the comments 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. for and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– received on the NPRM and the FAA’s 9450. response to each comment. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Examining the AD Docket Request To Revise Compliance Time for Resampling You may examine the AD docket on The National Agricultural Aviation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION the internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for Association (NAAA) commented that Federal Aviation Administration and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– additional compliance time may be 9450; or in person at Docket Operations required for oil filter analysis 14 CFR Part 39 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday resampling beyond the 25 hours time- in-service proposed by the NPRM. The [Docket No. FAA–2016–9450; Product through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, NAAA noted that the engine may re- Identifier 2016–NE–25–AD; Amendment 39– enter service after oil sampling. the regulatory evaluation, any 19317; AD 2018–13–05] Therefore, the 25 hours time-in-service comments received, and other RIN 2120–AA64 may be exceeded prior to the operators information. The address for the Docket receiving notification from the Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is laboratory that performed the oil filter International Inc. Turboprop and Docket Operations, U.S. Department of analysis. Turboshaft Engines Transportation, Docket Operations, We agree that the proposed M–30, West Building Ground Floor, compliance time may have resulted in AGENCY: Federal Aviation Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey operators exceeding the 25 hours time- Administration (FAA), DOT. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. in-service before receiving the results of ACTION: Final rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the oil filter analysis. We, therefore, SUMMARY: We are adopting a new Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer, Los revised the requirement time for airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 resampling in this AD to 25 hours time Honeywell International Inc. Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712– in service after receiving notification (Honeywell) TPE331 turboprop and 4137; phone: 562–627–5246; fax: 562– from the accredited laboratory TSE331 turboshaft engines. This AD 627–5210; email: [email protected]. performing the oil filter analysis. We was prompted by recent reports of determined that allowing this additional failures of the direct drive fuel control SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: time in service will improve the quality of the sample. We also clarified that if gears and bearings in the hydraulic Discussion torque sensor gear assembly, part an inspection or resample is required, number (P/N) 3101726–3. This AD We issued a notice of proposed then the inspection must occur within requires initial and repetitive engine oil rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 5 days after receiving notification from filter sampling and analysis of the part 39 by adding an AD that would the laboratory that performed the oil affected engines and inspections of apply to certain Honeywell filter analysis. certain hydraulic torque sensor gear International Inc. TPE331 turboprop and Request To Revise Compliance Time for assemblies. We are issuing this AD to TSE331 turboshaft engines. The NPRM Initial Sample address the unsafe condition on these published in the Federal Register on Honeywell requested that we increase products. September 13, 2017 (82 FR 42957). The the compliance time for obtaining an oil DATES: This AD is effective July 26, NPRM was prompted by recent reports filter sample from 150 to 200 hours. 2018. of failures of the direct drive fuel Honeywell commented that Honeywell The Director of the Federal Register control gears and bearings in the Service Bulletin (SB) TPE331–72–0180 approved the incorporation by reference hydraulic torque sensor gear assembly, indicates a 200-hours compliance time of a certain publication listed in this AD P/N 3101726–3. The NPRM proposed to for TPE331–10 operators with at least as of July 26, 2018. require initial and repetitive engine oil 800 operating hours per year. ADDRESSES: For service information filter sampling and analysis of the Honeywell noted that this compliance identified in this final rule, contact affected engines. The NPRM also time coincides with scheduled Honeywell International Inc., 111 S 34th proposed to require inspection of the maintenance intervals for operators. Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034–2802; phone: hydraulic torque sensor gear assemblies We disagree. We are attempting to 800–601–3099; internet: https:// that do not meet oil filter inspection detect impending torque sensor failures myaerospace.honeywell.com/wps/ requirements and improved component using set response times and reduced oil portal. You may view this service overhaul procedures that would remove filter sampling and analysis intervals. information at the FAA, Engine and from service, by attrition, certain P/N We find, therefore, that the 150-hour Propeller Standards Branch, Policy and hydraulic torque sensor gear assemblies. compliance time meets the safety Innovation Division, 1200 District We are issuing this AD to address the objectives of this AD. Further, we did Avenue, Burlington, MA. For unsafe condition on these products. not receive any comments from part 121 VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Jun 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM 21JNR1 pmangrum on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES 28764 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 / Rules and Regulations or part 135 operators indicating a Request To Update Service Information SIL describes procedures for conducting concern with the inspection interval of Honeywell requested that we revise the spectrometric oil and filter analysis 150 hours. We did not change this AD. our reference to the service bulletin to program to sample and analyze metal refer to the latest revision. particles in the engine lubricating Request To Revise Number of system. This service information is Resampling Tests We agree. We updated the reference in the Other Related Service Information reasonably available because the NAAA and Copperstate Turbine paragraph in this AD to Revision 38 of interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business Engine Company commented that a Honeywell SB TPE331–72–0180. or by the means identified in the single resampling allowance that may Request To Clarify Differences ADDRESSES section. lead to a gearbox inspection is too Paragraph stringent. They indicated that oil filter Other Related Service Information Honeywell requested that we clarify resampling experience has shown that We reviewed the improved multiple resampling tests may be the ‘‘Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information’’ procedures and limitations in the necessary. NAAA commented that the section in the NPRM. Honeywell Torque Sensor Gear source of the contamination may not We disagree. The referenced Assembly Overhaul Manual with always be the material caused by the paragraph does not exist in the final rule Illustrated Parts List, 72–00–17, torque sensor failure. In this situation, and the compliance requirements were Revision 10, dated October 31, 2013, for NAAA indicated that another clearly defined in the NPRM. We did the TPE331 and TSE331 torque sensor resampling, without the inspection, may not change this AD. gear assemblies. We also reviewed be warranted. NAAA commented that Honeywell’s TPE331 Line Maintenance the sample analysis should guide Conclusion Training Manual which provides maintenance personnel in the proper We reviewed the relevant data, guidance for obtaining oil filter samples. direction without having to tear down considered the comments received, and In addition, we reviewed Honeywell an engine unnecessarily. determined that air safety and the SBs TPE331–72–0402, Revision 6, dated We partially agree. We agree that public interest require adopting this November 26, 1997; TPE331–72–0403, some wear elements, such as silver and final rule with the changes described Revision 5, dated January 20, 1989; aluminum, found during the initial oil previously and minor editorial changes. TPE331–72–0404, Revision 8, dated September 13, 2016; TPE331–72–0823, filter analysis could permit more than We have determined that these minor Revision 3, dated September 13, 1996; one resampling before a required changes: • TSE331–72–5003, Revision 3, dated gearbox inspection. We also agree Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for January 20, 1989; and TPE331–72–0180, because these elements or alloys may correcting the unsafe condition; and Revision 38, dated August 15, 2017. The not cause accelerated wear and possible • Do not add any additional burden SBs address the inspection intervals for failure of the torque sensor assembly. upon the public than was already the oil and filter analysis for the affected We disagree with changing the AD proposed in the NPRM. TPE331 and TSE331 engines. because the commenters have not We also determined that these Costs of Compliance produced evidence that the presence of changes will not increase the economic certain elements may not contribute to burden on any operator or increase the We estimate that this AD affects 3,831 the failure of the torque sensor. We will scope of this final rule. engines installed on airplanes of U.S. consider AMOC requests to allow registry.
Recommended publications
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2011. ■ 2012 USAF Almanac Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying intercontinental missions and penetrating enemy defenses with the largest payload of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 66. Aircraft Location: Dyess AFB, Tex.; Edwards AFB, Calif.; Eglin AFB, Fla.; Ellsworth AFB, S.D. Contractor: Boeing, AIL Systems, General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbofans, each 30,780 lb thrust. Accommodation: pilot, copilot, and two WSOs (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. Dimensions: span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 ft, height 34 ft. B-1B Lancer (SSgt. Brian Ferguson) Weight: max T-O 477,000 lb. Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft. carriage, improved onboard computers, improved B-2 Spirit Performance: speed 900+ mph at S-L, range communications. Sniper targeting pod added in Brief: Stealthy, long-range multirole bomber that intercontinental. mid-2008. Receiving Fully Integrated Data Link can deliver nuclear and conventional munitions Armament: three internal weapons bays capable of (FIDL) upgrade to include Link 16 and Joint Range anywhere on the globe. accommodating a wide range of weapons incl up to Extension data link, enabling permanent LOS and Function: Long-range heavy bomber.
  • Annex III to Decision 2015/029/R

    Annex III to Decision 2015/029/R

    AMC/GM TO ANNEX III (PART-66) TO REGULATION (EU) No 1321/2014 APPENDICES TO AMC TO PART-66 APPENDICES TO AMC TO PART-66 APPENDIX I AIRCRAFT TYPE RATINGS FOR PART-66 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE LICENCES The following aircraft type ratings should be used to ensure a common standard throughout the Member States. The inclusion of an aircraft type in the licence does not indicate that the aircraft type has been granted a type certificate under the Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 and its Implementing Rules; this list is only intended for maintenance purposes. In order to keep this list current and the type ratings consistent, such information should be first passed on to the Agency using the Rulemaking Enquiry form (http://easa.europa.eu/webgate/rulemaking-enquiry/) in case a Member State needs to issue a type rating that is not included in this list. Notes on when the licences should be modified: When a modification is introduced by this Decision to an aircraft type rating or to an engine designation in the rating which affect licences already issued, the ratings on the Aircraft Maintenance Licences (AMLs) may be modified at the next renewal or when the licence is reissued, unless there is an urgent reason to modify the licence. Notes on aircraft modified by Supplemental Type Certificate (STC): — This Appendix I intends to include the type ratings of aircraft resulting from STCs for installation of another engine. These STCs are those approved by the Agency and those approved by the Member States before 2003 and grandfathered by the Agency.
  • Military Vehicle Options Arising from the Barrel Type Piston Engine

    Military Vehicle Options Arising from the Barrel Type Piston Engine

    Journal of Power Technologies 101 (1) (2021) 22–33 Military vehicle options arising from the barrel type piston engine Pawe l Mazuro1 and Cezary Chmielewski1,B 1Warsaw University of Technology B [email protected] Abstract in terms of efficiency, meaning that piston engines can deliver enhanced range and endurance. This is benefi- The article reviews knowledge about requirements for engines in cial in missions requiring a stopover for refueling and state-of-the-art unmanned aerial vehicles and tanks. Analysis of particularly useful for unmanned supply, observation design and operational parameters was carried out on selected and maritime missions. turboshaft and piston engines generating power in the range of 500 - 1500 kW (0.5 - 1.5 MW). The data was compared In contrast, land combat vehicles have significantly with the performance of innovative, barrel type piston engines, different drive unit requirements. High mobility en- which are likely to become an alternative drive solution in the ables the vehicle to rapidly change location after de- target vehicle groups. tection. To this end, the torque curve as a function of the rotational speed of the shaft is of decisive im- portance. Keywords: military UAV, tanks, turboshaft engines, piston engines, barrel type piston engines The complexity of tank engines adds an additional layer of requirements, impacting the reliability and durability of the power unit, and they come with re- 1 Introduction lated manufacturing and operating costs. In military land vehicles, the engine should be as small This article consolidates knowledge on options and as possible; the space saved can be used for other capabilities arising from use of the barrel type piston purposes.
  • Diesel, Spark-Ignition, and Turboprop Engines for Long-Duration Unmanned Air Flights

    Diesel, Spark-Ignition, and Turboprop Engines for Long-Duration Unmanned Air Flights

    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER Diesel, Spark-Ignition, and Turboprop Engines for Long-Duration Unmanned Air Flights Daniele Cirigliano,∗ Aaron M. Frisch,† Feng Liu,‡ and William A. Sirignano‡ University of California, Irvine, California 92697 DOI: 10.2514/1.B36547 Comparisons are made for propulsion systems for unmanned flights with several hundred kilowatts of propulsive power at moderate subsonic speeds up to 50 h in duration. Gas-turbine engines (turbofans and turboprops), two- and four-stroke reciprocating (diesel and spark-ignition) engines, and electric motors (with electric generation by a combustion engine) are analyzed. Thermal analyses of these engines are performed in the power range of interest. Consideration is given to two types of generic missions: 1) a mission dominated by a constant-power requirement, and 2) a mission with intermittent demand for high thrust and/or substantial auxiliary power. The weights of the propulsion system, required fuel, and total aircraft are considered. Nowadays, diesel engines for airplane applications are rarely a choice. However, this technology is shown to bea very serious competitor for long-durationunmanned air vehicle flights. The two strongest competitors are gas-turbine engines and turbocharged four-stroke diesel engines, each type driving propellers. It is shown that hybrid-electric schemes and configurations with several propellers driven by one power source are less efficient. At the 500 KW level, one gas-turbine engine driving a larger propeller is more efficient for durations up to 25 h, whereas several diesel engines driving several propellers become more efficient at longer durations. The decreasing efficiency of the gas-turbine engine with decreasing size and increasing compression ratio is a key factor.
  • ATP® Libraries Catalog

    ATP® Libraries Catalog

    2 ATP® Libraries Catalog Revision Date May 24 2016 ATP 101 South Hill Drive Brisbane, CA 94005 (+1) 415-330-9500 www.atp.com ATP® Policies and Legal www.atp.com/policy © Copyright 2016, ATP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of ATP. The information in this catalog is subject to change without notice.ATP, ATP Knowledge, ATP Aviation Hub, HubConnect, NavigatorV, and their respective logos, are among the registered trademarks or trademarks of ATP. All third-party trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners and ATP asserts no ownership rights to these items. iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. All original authorship of ATP is protected under U.S. and foreign copyrights and is subject to written license agreements between ATP and its subscribers. Visit www.atp.com/policy for more information ATP Customer Support Please visit www.atp.com/support for customer support information ATP® Libraries Catalog – Revision Date: May 24 2016 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATORY LIBRARIES .............................................................................................................................................
  • AMC a GM K Částem M, 145, 66, 147

    AMC a GM K Částem M, 145, 66, 147

    Konsolidované zn ění Evropská agentura pro bezpe čnost letectví AMC a GM k Částem M, 145, 66, 147 Přijatelné zp ůsoby pr ůkazu a poradenský materiál k na řízení Komise (ES) č. 2042/2003 ze dne 20. listopadu 2003 pro zachování letové zp ůsobilosti letadel a leteckých výrobk ů, letadlových částí a za řízení a schvalování organizací a personálu zapojených do t ěchto úkol ů Ve zn ění: Datum ú činnosti Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2003/19/RM 28. 11. 2003 ze dne 28. listopadu 2003 Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2005/07/R 19. 12. 2005 ze dne 19. prosince 2005 Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2006/01/R 16. 05. 2006 ze dne 16. kv ětna 2006 Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2006/06/R 07. 08. 2006 ze dne 31. července 2006 Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2006/11/R 25. 12. 2006 ze dne 18. prosince 2006 Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2006/14/R 27. 12. 2006 ze dne 20. prosince 2006 Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2007/001/R 20. 03. 2007 ze dne 13. b řezna 2007 Konsolidované zn ění Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2007/002/R 20. 03. 2007 ze dne 13. b řezna 2007 Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2007/003/R 20. 03. 2007 ze dne 13. b řezna 2007 Rozhodnutí výkonného ředitele č. 2007/009/R 02. 05. 2007 ze dne 25. dubna 2007 ZÁM ĚRN Ě NEPOUŽITO AMC k Části M Konsoidované zn ění AMC a GM k Části M ČÁST M OBSAH Přijatelné zp ůsoby pr ůkazu k Části M ODDÍL A – Technické požadavky A – A – 1 Hlava A – Všeobecn ě A – A – 1 Hlava B – Odpov ědnost ě A – B – 1 AMC M.A.201 (h) Odpov ědnosti A – A – 1 AMC M.A.201 (h) 1 Odpov ědnosti A – B – 1 AMC M.A.201 (h)
  • SFTE FTE Reference Handbook

    SFTE FTE Reference Handbook

    SFTE Reference Handbook Third Edition 2013 Society of Flight Test Engineers Reference Handbook Third Edition 2013 Page - i SFTE Reference Handbook Third Edition 2013 Society of Flight Test Engineers Reference Handbook 2013 Edition Corporate support supplied by Cessna Aircraft for printing the 2007 Edition And The National Test Pilot School Contributing Authors Al Lawless (sections 1-8, 10-12, 15, 18) Greg Lewis (section 2.6) Bill Norton (sections 9, 13) Dan Hrehov (section 14) Steven Arney (section 16) John Minor (section 19) David Kidman, Christopher Moulder, Craig Stevens (section 17) Edited by Lee Gardner & Darcy Painter 1998-2006 Harold Weaver 2006-2013 The SFTE handbook committee continually seeks corporate sponsors for this book and authors for new sections (including but not limited to INS, GPS, EMI/EMF, radar, avionics, R&M, E-O, human factors, orbital mechan- ics, armament) Page - ii SFTE Reference Handbook Third Edition 2013 Publication Policy Copyright (C) 2013 by Society Of Flight Test Engineers All rights reserved. This Technical Handbook is for the exclusive use of the Society of Flight Test Engineers individual and Corporate Members. The Technical information contained herein may not be reproduced by any other individual or organization in any form without writ- ten permission from the Society of Flight Test Engineers. The Society reserves the exclusive right of publication. For further information concerning the publication policy, write to: Society of Flight Test Engineers 44814 N. Elm Avenue Lancaster, California 93534 USA Or: Contact the Society of Flight Test Engineers through their web site at www.sfte.org. Please submit corrections or additions to SFTE Handbook Committee 44814 N.
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2015. By Aaron M. U. Church, Senior Editor ■ 2016 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT B-1 Lancer Brief: Long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and de- livering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. COMMENTARY The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four proto- types were developed and tested before program cancellation in 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998. Its three internal weapons bays accommodate a substantial payload of weapons, including a mix of different weapons in each bay. Lancer production totaled 100 aircraft. The bomber’s blended wing/ body configuration, variable-geometry design, and turbofan engines provide long range and loiter time. The B-1B has been upgraded with GPS, smart weapons, and mission systems. Offensive avionics include SAR for tracking, B-2A Spirit (SSgt. Jeremy M. Wilson) targeting, and engaging moving vehicles and terrain following. GPS-aided INS lets aircrews autonomously navigate without ground-based navigation aids Dimensions: Span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 and precisely engage targets. Sniper pod was added in 2008. The ongoing ft, height 34 ft. integrated battle station modifications is the most comprehensive refresh in Weight: Max T-O 477,000 lb.
  • CRD) to Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03-2006

    CRD) to Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03-2006

    Comment Response Document (CRD) to Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03-2006 for amending the Executive Director Decision No. 2005/07/R of 19 December 2005 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks APPENDIX I AIRCRAFT TYPE RATINGS FOR PART-66 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE LICENCE CRD to NPA 03/2006 Explanatory Note I. General 1. The purpose of the Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03/2006, dated 20 April 2006 was to propose an amendment to Decision N° 2005/07/R of the Executive Director of the Agency of 19 December 2005 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (ED Decision 2005/07/R). II. Consultation 2. The draft Executive Director Decision (ED Decision) amending ED Decision 2005/07/R was published on the web site (www.easa.europa.eu) on 21 April 2006. By the closing date of 2 June 2006, European Aviation Safety Agency (the Agency) had received 107 comments from 20 National Aviation Authorities, professional organisations and private companies. III. Publication of the CRD 3. All comments received have been acknowledged and incorporated into a Comment Response Document (CRD). This CRD contains a list of all persons and/or organisations that have provided comments and the answers of the Agency.
  • THE AERO INDIA ISSUE Safran I/ 2015 I/ 2015 Aerospace & Defence Review

    THE AERO INDIA ISSUE Safran I/ 2015 I/ 2015 Aerospace & Defence Review

    I/ 2015 Aerospace & Defence Review AERO INDIA 2015 THE AERO INDIA ISSUE Safran I/ 2015 I/ 2015 Aerospace & Defence Review The Indian source’ assessment of the LCA’s status, In an interview with General Dalbir Singh, 42 with a no–holds bar examination of this the Indian Army COAS enumerates Aerospace Riddle light fighter programme. Focus must his vision and focus areas for the Indian be on weight reduction improvement Army, including plans for integrating which is the key as also some re-designs attack helicopters in the combined arms including lengthening of the fuselage and environment. tweaking of the wing. AERO INDIA 2015 Airbus A350XWB THE AERO INDIA ISSUE Thunder from the 94 VAYU Cover I-2015.indd 3 06-02-2015 11:59:31 71 to Qatar Airways Artist’s impression of IAF Su-30MKIs conducting an Air Marshal Brijesh Jayal writes on the North-West (of India) air strike as a pair of Tejas LCAs provide top cover. ‘riddle’ where ‘aerospace shines and The Su-30MKI is the IAF’s primary combat aircraft, aeronautics whines!’ Even while feat of while the Tejas LCA has recently been accepted into the Mars Orbiter Mission, Mangalyaan service. Both aircraft types are on display at Aero India 2015 (Digital art by Priyanka Joshi) has impressed the world, the country struggles to develop basic training aircraft. EDITORIAL PANEL A contrasting look at the Sino-Pakistani MANAGING EDITOR Aerospace Power JF-17 Thunder light fighter which Vikramjit Singh Chopra 46 development programme began in Vayu was present at Toulouse when the in the 21st Century 1999 and one which has ‘over taken’ EDITORIAL ADVISOR first Airbus A350XWB was handed over the LCA in terms of clearance for Admiral Arun Prakash to Qatar Airways.
  • Comprehensive and Cost-Effective Global Coverage for the TPE331 Honeywell Aerospace 1944 E

    Comprehensive and Cost-Effective Global Coverage for the TPE331 Honeywell Aerospace 1944 E

    A60-0942-000-001 TPE331:Layout 1 7/16/2007 3:29 PM Page 1 TPE331 Maintenance Service Plan Find out more Honeywell Aerospace Business & General Aviation 23, Rue du 19 Mars 1962 92230 Gennevilliers France Phone: 33 (0) 1 40 80 59 11 Mobile: 33 (0) 6 32 55 06 08 Fax: 33 (0) 1 40 80 59 67 e-mail: [email protected] Comprehensive and cost-effective global coverage for the TPE331 Honeywell Aerospace 1944 E. Sky Harbor Circle turboprop engine Phoenix, AZ 85034 Toll Free: 1-800-601-3099 International: 602-365-3099 A60-0942-000-001 July 2007 www.honeywell.com © 2007 Honeywell International Inc. A60-0942-000-001 TPE331:Layout 1 7/16/2007 3:29 PM Page 3 Honeywell’s MSP...Extended Coverage COVERED ITEMS NON-COVERED ITEMS Scheduled Maintenance Routine Inspection S.O.A.P. kit and analysis (if obtained from an Authorized Service Center) Routine periodic inspection labor Hot Section Inspection (HSI) by an Authorized Major Service Center MSP Operator Advantages Enhanced aircraft resale value: Inspection labor Consumable parts The TPE331 MSP Program is available to executive/corporate Accrued engine value transferable to new owner Other required parts operators of Honeywell TPE331-5/-6/-8/-10/-11/-12 or -14 Component repair labor (if required) Aircraft value not reduced due to engine repairs powered aircraft. No other maintenance program offers such Cycle life-limited parts comprehensive coverage at an affordable price. With the Enhanced aircraft value offsets program cost Engine removal and reinstallation and/or access time flexibility of receiving service at over 125 authorized service Gearbox Inspection (GBI) by an Authorized Major Service Center centers worldwide, you receive the most up-to-date service Honeywell’s MSP .