Inhabitants of Frontier Regions of Azerbaijan Are Deliberately Deprived of Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inhabitants of Frontier Regions of Azerbaijan Are Deliberately Deprived of Water http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 13931 12 December 2015 Inhabitants of frontier regions of Azerbaijan are deliberately deprived of water Report1 Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development Rapporteur: Ms Milica MARKOVIĆ, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Socialist Group Summary Access to drinking water and sanitation has been recognised by the United Nations as a human right. States have an obligation to secure their population’s access to sufficient, safe and affordable water resources. In the case of the frontier regions of Azerbaijan depending on water supplies from the Sarsang water reservoir located in Nagorno-Karabakh, the population faces environmental and humanitarian problems, as well as security risks in the whole border region linked to the lack of regular maintenance work on the Sarsang dam. The report therefore calls for unimpeded access by independent engineers and hydrologists to inspect and assess the situation on site. It emphasises the need for global management of the use and upkeep of the Sarsang water resources, with international supervision of the irrigation canals, the Sarsang and Madagiz dams, the schedule of water releases during the autumn and winter, and aquifer overexploitation. The Parliamentary Assembly is invited to ask the Armenian authorities to cease the use of water resources as a political tool. 1. Reference to committee: Doc. 13468, Reference 4043 of 11 April 2014. F - 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | [email protected] | Tel: +33 3 88 41 2000 | Fax: +33 3 88 41 2733 Doc. 13931 Report Contents Page A. Draft resolution......................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Explanatory memorandum by Ms Marković, rapporteur............................................................................4 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. The Sarsang reservoir: what is the status quo?................................................................................... 4 2.1. Key facts about the reservoir....................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Problematic aspects regarding Sarsang...................................................................................... 5 3. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Appendix – Dissenting opinion by Ms Naira Karapetyan (Armenia, EPP/CD), member of the committee .... 11 2 Doc. 13931 Report A. Draft resolution2 1. The Parliamentary Assembly reminds all its member States that the right to water is essential to life and health, as specified in the 1992 United Nations Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (“Water Convention”), and thus constitutes a prior condition for the enjoyment of other human rights. The Assembly emphasises the obligation of States to secure their population’s access to sufficient, safe and affordable water resources. 2. The Assembly regards unimpeded access to drinking water, which cannot be restricted by the existence of borders, as a basic right, a source of life and an asset of strategic importance to every State. The Assembly confirms that deliberate deprivation of water cannot be used as a means to harm innocent citizens. 3. The Assembly considers that the deliberate creation of an artificial environmental crisis must be regarded as “environmental aggression” and seen as a hostile act by one State towards another aimed at creating environmental disaster areas and making normal life impossible for the population concerned. 4. The Assembly deplores that the occupation by Armenia of Nagorno-Karabakh and other adjacent areas of Azerbaijan creates similar humanitarian and environmental problems for the citizens of Azerbaijan living in the Lower Karabakh valley. 5. The Assembly notes that the lack of regular maintenance work for over twenty years on the Sarsang reservoir, located in one of the areas of Azerbaijan occupied by Armenia, poses a danger to the whole border region. The Assembly emphasises that the state of disrepair of the Sarsang dam could result in a major disaster with great loss of human life and possibly a fresh humanitarian crisis. 6. In view of this urgent humanitarian problem, the Assembly requests: 6.1. the immediate withdrawal of Armenian armed forces from the region concerned, thus allowing: 6.1.1. access by independent engineers and hydrologists to carry out a detailed on-the-spot survey; 6.1.2. global management, throughout the catchment area, of the use and upkeep of the Sarsang water resources; 6.1.3. international supervision of the irrigation canals, the state of the Sarsang and Madagiz dams, the schedule of water releases during the autumn and winter, and aquifer overexploitation; 6.2. the Armenian authorities to cease using water resources as tools of political influence or an instrument of pressure benefiting only one of the parties to the conflict. 7. The Assembly firmly condemns the lack of co-operation of the Armenian parliamentary delegation and the Armenian authorities during the preparation of the report on this issue. The Assembly regards such behaviour as incompatible with the obligations and commitments of a country which is a full member of the Council of Europe. The Assembly will consider what measures to take in this case and in any similar cases which may arise during the terms of office of its parliamentarians. 2. Draft resolution adopted by the committee on 23 November 2015. 3 Doc. 13931 Report B. Explanatory memorandum by Ms Marković, rapporteur 1. Introduction 1. Water unites, water divides – but remains central to human development. Water is part of humanity’s common heritage and a resource which is essential to human survival. Yet water remains a limited and vulnerable resource. 2. By recognising, in 2010, the right to clean drinking water and sanitation as a human right, the United Nations emphasised the role of water in the full enjoyment of life and other human rights. It also reaffirmed a series of obligations on key stakeholders, notably States. These are required to secure their population’s access to sufficient, safe and affordable water resources3. 3. Despite continued improvements in local water supply, the situation remains critical in certain regions of Europe. Problems are more often than not caused by mismanagement of water resources, affecting the daily needs of hundreds of thousands of people. One in every six inhabitants of the world still does not have consistent access to water. Water can therefore also be a source of conflict. 4. Intensive farming, industrial activities, climate change and consumer habits, but also policy mistakes and politics can all lead to conflict situations. Our Parliamentary Assembly’s attention has been drawn to the serious difficulties the local population is confronted with in the non-occupied frontier regions of Azerbaijan depending on the Sarsang water reservoir located in Nagorno-Karabakh. 5. This report deals with the problems affecting the above-mentioned regions and seeks to propose pragmatic solutions that the authorities of the two neighbouring countries concerned could adopt in order to optimise water management in their border regions. 6. As rapporteur, I am obliged to inform the Assembly that, in the preparation of the report, I only made two fact-finding visits, both to Azerbaijan: in December 2014, during the winter, and in August 2015, during the summer, in order to take account of the changes in living conditions from one season to another. Unfortunately, I did not have the opportunity to undertake a visit to Armenia, owing to the lack of co-operation of the Armenian delegation, which did not accede to the successive requests that were submitted to it: official letter from the Secretary General of the Assembly, requests from the Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development and my own requests. Because of the limited time for the preparation of this report, I was obliged to press ahead with my work without being able to undertake a visit to Armenia. 2. The Sarsang reservoir: what is the status quo? 2.1. Key facts about the reservoir 7. Sarsang is a large water reservoir located in the Nagorno-Karabakh area of Azerbaijan but controlled de facto by Armenia since 1993. The reservoir was formed in 1976 when a dam was built on the Tartar/Terter River by the Soviet Socialist Republic of Azerbaijan, as it was at the time. The installation is located in a mountain valley at an altitude of 726 metres above sea level, with a dam 125 metres in height and a capacity to hold up to 575 million m3 of water. The reservoir’s shoreline is about 50.25 kilometres long. 8. The system also comprises a regulating reservoir with an earth dam (about 6 million cubic meters) at Madagiz, situated about 20 km downstream from the main reservoir. Madagiz plays an important role in the operation of the Sarsang reservoir/irrigation system, because the irrigation canals (the main canal plus the northern and southern branches) start downstream from this dam. Up until 1994, water released from the upper spillways was directed to the canals for irrigation use. 9. The main purpose of the Sarsang reservoir was to supply the local population with drinking water and irrigation water for the fertile areas of this
Recommended publications
  • IJTPE Journal
    International Journal on ISSN 2077-3528 “Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering” IJTPE Journal (IJTPE) www.iotpe.com Published by International Organization of IOTPE [email protected] June 2021 Issue 47 Volume 13 Number 2 Pages 107-111 ESTIMATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES POTENTIAL FOR SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS LOCATED ON THE WATER SURFACE OF SMALL LAKES AND RESERVOIRS Z.A. Mammadov 1,2 R.E. Kerimov 2 O.Z. Kerimov 3 N.R. Rahmanov 3 1. Ministry of Energy, Baku, Azerbaijan, [email protected] 2. CPEE Center, Baku, Azerbaijan, [email protected] 3. CPEE Center, Baku, Azerbaijan, [email protected] 4. CPEE Center, Baku, Azerbaijan, [email protected] Abstract- At present, the photovoltaic (PV) systems are reflected light of solar panels, etc. Taking into account one of the most promising among renewable energy also the lack of useful arable land, the use of FPV Solar resources (RES), which share of power generation is Stations will avoid some of these problems. In addition, growing dynamically, ahead of other types RES. The FPV Solar Stations also use some part of sunlight Floating PV Systems (FPV) are a new type of such reflected from the water surface and additional cooling of systems that are located in the unused part of the water solar cells by water - which makes them 11% more surfaces of lakes, river deltas, natural water basins, efficient in comparison with similar stations on land [1]. reservoirs of hydroelectric power stations. For FPV Solar FPV also reduce the evaporation of reservoir water [2] Station even a small water reservoirs intended for and protect algae by creating the shade [3].
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    75967 Review of World Bank engagement in the Public Disclosure Authorized Irrigation and Drainage Sector in Azerbaijan Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized February 2013 Public Disclosure Authorized © 2012 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000I Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Identical Letters Dated 27 April 2016 from the Chargé D’Affaires A.I
    United Nations A/70/849–S/2016/398 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 April 2016 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventieth session Seventy-first year Agenda items 35 and 40 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Identical letters dated 27 April 2016 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council Further to the letter from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Elmar Mammadyarov, dated 20 April 2016, on the recent escalation of the situation at the line of contact of the armed forces of Armenia and Azerbaijan and the border between the two States, I would like to draw your attention to the latest gross violation by the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia of the ceasefire agreement of 5 April 2016, reached in Moscow between the Chiefs of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia, with the assistance of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The armed forces of Armenia, while concentrating additional forces and military equipment at the line of contact, starting from 23 April 2016, fired intensively on the positions of the armed forces of Azerbaijan and the civilian settlements near the confrontation line using large-calibre weapons, mortars, grenade launchers and heavy artillery.
    [Show full text]
  • Torontohye124-February-Cmprs-2016.Pdf
    IJ. î³ñÇ ÂÇõ 4 (124), öºîðàô²ð 2016 Volume 11, No. 4 (124), February 2016 Øß³ÏáõóÛÇÝ, ÀÝÏ»ñ³ÛÇÝ, ²Ûɳ½³Ý ä³ñµ»ñ³Ã»ñà Toronto Armenian Community Newspaper êáõñdzѳۻñáõ ÂáñáÝÃû ijٳÝáõÙÁ ÎÁ Þ³ñáõݳÏáõÇ Ð³Û Î»¹ñáÝÁ ²é³õ»É³·áÛÝë Æ ¶áñÍ ÏÁ ¸Ý¿ Æñ γñ»ÉáõÃÇõÝÝ»ñÁ êáõñÇ³Ñ³Û Ù³ÝáõÏ ÙÁª ÌÝݹ»³Ý ѳõ³ùÇ ¶³ÕÃ³Ï³Ý³Ï³Ý Ð³ñó»ñáõ ¶ñ³ë»Ý»³ÏÇ Ï³Ù³õáñ »ñÇï³ë³ñ¹Ý»ñ êáõñdzѳۻñáõ ѳٳñ CABC-Ç Ï³½Ù³Ï»ñå³Í Job Fair-Ç ³ï»Ý Ï°û·Ý»Ý ëáõñdzѳۻñáõ ÃáõÕûñáõ å³ïñ³ëïáõû³Ý ³ß˳ï³ÝùÇÝ: Ù³ëݳÏÇóÝ»ñ: Ð³Û Î»¹ñáÝÇ ¶³ÕÃ³Ï³Ý³Ï³Ý Ýáõñ ¹Å·áÑáõÃÇõݪ ·³Ý³ï³Ï³Ý Ï»³Ý- ñ»ÏÝ»ñáõÝ óáõóÙáõÝùÝ»ñ ÏÁ ïñáõÇÝ Ý³»õ Ëûë»Éáíª§Ø»ñ ѳÛÏ³Ï³Ý í³ñųñ³ÝÇ Ð³ñó»ñáõ ¶ñ³ë»Ý»³ÏÁ (ACC-SAH) ³Ûë ùÇ, Û³ïϳå¿ë ·áñÍÇ å³ÛÙ³ÝÝ»ñáõÝ úÝóñÇáÛÇ ÁÝÓ»é³Í ³éáÕç³å³Ñ³- ³ß³Ï»ñï ÁݹáõÝ»Éáõ ϳñáÕáõÃÇõÝÁ ³ñ- ûñ»ñáõÝ Ù»ÕáõÇ ÷»Ã³ÏÇ å¿ë ÏÁ µ³ÝǪ ѳݹ¿å: ÀݹѳÝñ³å¿ë ¶³Ý³ï³ Ý»ñ- Ï³Ý Íñ³·ÇñÝ»ñáõ Ù³ëÇÝ, ÇÝùݳ߳ñÅ ¹¿Ý ³ÙµáÕç³ó³Í ¿: ²é³çÇÝ »ÏáÕÝ»ñÁ ûñÝ Ç µáõÝ£ ·³ÕÃáÕ ÙÁ Ñá·»å¿ë »õ Ùï³å¿ë å³ï- ùß»Éáõ ³ñïûݳ·ñÇ, å»ï³Ï³Ý ÁÝï³- ³ñ¹¿Ý ï»Õ³õáñáõ»ó³Ý ¹åñáóÇÝ Ù¿çª Ø¿Ï ÏáÕÙ¿` ¶ñ³ë»Ý»³ÏÇ å³ï³ë- ñ³ëïáõ³Í Ï°ÁÉÉ³Û ·³Ý³ï³Ï³Ý Ï»³Ý- Ý»Ï³Ý Û³ïϳóáõÙÝ»ñ¿Ý û·ïáõ»Éáõ »õ ³ÛÉ ³Ýí׳é Ï»ñåáí¦, ÏÁ µ³ó³ïñ¿ ²µ·³ñ ˳ݳïáõݪ ÈáñÇÏ Î³ñåáõß»³Ý ¶³- ùÇ Ï»Ýó³Õ³ÛÇÝ å³Ñ³ÝçÝ»ñáõÝ, ë³- ͳé³ÛáõÃÇõÝÝ»ñáõ Ù³ëÇÝ: ØÇñ³ù»³Ýª ¶³ÕÃ³Ï³Ý³Ï³Ý Ð³ñó»- ÃÁñ×»³Ý Ï°³ÙµáÕç³óÝ¿ Ýáñ Å³Ù³Ý³Í Ï³ÛÝ, ³Ûë ·³ÕóϳÝÝ»ñáõ (refugees) ÚáõÝáõ³ñÇÝ ¶ñ³ë»Ý»³ÏÁ` ·áñͳÏ- ñáõ Û³ÝÓݳËáõÙµÇÝ ³ï»Ý³å»ïÁ: §ÎÁ ëáõñdzѳۻñáõ å»ï³Ï³Ý ³ñӳݳ·- å³ñ³·³Ý ï³ñµ»ñ ¿ñ ³ÛÝ ÇÙ³ëïáí, ó³µ³ñ ê.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukarı Karabağ'da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer
    Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory in Nagorno-Karabakh after 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory in Nagorno-Karabakh after 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА ISBN: 978-625-7779-91-3 Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory In Nagorno-Karabakh After 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА © 2021 CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI İLETİŞİM BAŞKANLIĞI YAYINLARI © 2021 PUBLICATIONS BY PRESIDENCY’S DIRECTORATE OF COMMUNICATIONS © 2021 ИЗДАНИЯ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ КОММУНИКАЦИИ ПРИ АДМИНИСТРАЦИИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА Yayıncı Sertifika No: 45482 | Publication Certificate No.: 45482 | Сертификат издателя № 45482 1. Baskı, İstanbul, 2021 | 1st Edition, Istanbul | 1 Издание, Стамбул İletişim | Contact | Контакты Kızılırmak Mahallesi Mevlana Bulv. No:144 Çukurambar Ankara/TÜRKİYE T +90 312 590 20 00 | [email protected] Baskı | Print | Печать Prestij Grafik Rek. ve Mat. San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. T 0 212 489 40 63, İstanbul Matbaa Sertifika No: 45590 Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory In Nagorno-Karabakh After 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА İÇİNDEKİLER CONTENTS СОДЕРЖАНИЕ 1. Önsöz Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 07 Preface Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 101 Предисловие Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 199 1.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership Result 1 Report on methodology for identification of water abstraction limits depending on ecological flow needs for the rivers of Azerbaijan Baku, 2019 Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the “Report on methodology for identification of water abstraction limits depending on ecological flow needs for the rivers of Azerbaijan”, was produced by UNECE at the request of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan and with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. Executive summary Excessive abstraction of water is one of the key problems of water management in Azerbaijan, which leads among other problems to drying out of many small rivers as a consequence of massive water intake. Ensuring environmental flows in rivers can protect the proper functioning of aquatic ecosystems, thus, contributing to meeting environmental objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Azerbaijan (Textbook)
    DILGAM ISMAILOV HISTORY OF AZERBAIJAN (TEXTBOOK) Azerbaijan Architecture and Construction University Methodological Council of the meeting dated July 7, 2017, was published at the direction of № 6 BAKU - 2017 Dilgam Yunis Ismailov. History of Azerbaijan, AzMİU NPM, Baku, 2017, p.p.352 Referents: Anar Jamal Iskenderov Konul Ramiq Aliyeva All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means. Electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. In Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, the book “History of Azerbaijan” is written on the basis of a syllabus covering all topics of the subject. Author paid special attention to the current events when analyzing the different periods of Azerbaijan. This book can be used by other high schools that also teach “History of Azerbaijan” in English to bachelor students, master students, teachers, as well as to the independent learners of our country’s history. 2 © Dilgam Ismailov, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………….……… 9 I Theme. Introduction to the history of Azerbaijan 10 II Theme: The Primitive Society in Azerbaijan…. 18 1.The Initial Residential Dwellings……….............… 18 2.The Stone Age in Azerbaijan……………………… 19 3.The Copper, Bronze and Iron Ages in Azerbaijan… 23 4.The Collapse of the Primitive Communal System in Azerbaijan………………………………………….... 28 III Theme: The Ancient and Early States in Azer- baijan. The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms.. 30 1.The First Tribal Alliances and Initial Public Institutions in Azerbaijan……………………………. 30 2.The Kingdom of Manna…………………………… 34 3.The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms………….
    [Show full text]
  • Nagorno-Karabakh: a New Turkish Front Against Russia ? Pierre Razoux Academic and Research Director of the FMES Institute
    13.10.2020 Nagorno-Karabakh: a new Turkish front against Russia ? Pierre Razoux Academic and Research Director of the FMES Institute ABSTRACT By encouraging Azeri President Ilham Aliyev in his attempt to regain Nagorno-Karabakh, President Erdogan opened a new front facing the Kremlin to boast a symbolic success with his population and to force Vladimir Putin to accept a compromise on the other Syrian, Libyan, Mediterranean and energy fronts. This strategy is not without risk because the conflict could spread to the secessionist republics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia in neighbouring Georgia. Above all, it could provoke an escalation of tensions with Iran. The relatively even military balance between Armenia and Azerbaijan does not allow either of the two belligerents to conduct a victorious blitzkrieg against the territory of the other, a fortiori in the very mountainous Nagorno-Karabakh. Any confrontation will structurally lead to a war of attrition, leaving time for the Turkish and Russian presidents to negotiate. Forcing his luck, Recep Tayyip Erdogan could be tempted to annex the northern part of Cyprus soon, exchanging his disengagement from the South Caucasus for the silence of the Kremlin. By encouraging Azeri President Ilham Aliyev in his attempt to reconquer the secessionist province of Nagorno-Karabakh defended by Armenia (launched on September 27, 2020), has President Recep Tayyip Erdogan voluntarily opened a new front against the Kremlin to force Vladimir Putin to find a compromise on the other Syrian, Libyan, Mediterranean and energy fronts? It must be noted that the counteroffensive of Fayez el-Sarraj in Libya, supported by the Turkish President, is trampling on in front of Sirte1, that the battle of Idlib is not turning to the advantage of pro-Turkish forces in Syria - even if the death-blow of the Syrian regime, supported by Moscow, is slow in coming - and that Turkey has had to back-pedal in the Eastern Mediterranean under triple pressure from the United States, NATO2 and the Europeans3.
    [Show full text]
  • Coi Chronology
    COI CHRONOLOGY Country of Origin ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN Main subject The course of the Nagorno-Karabakh armed conflict and its impact on the civilian population Date of completion 10 November 2020 Disclaimer This chronology note has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this chronology has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. The information in this chronology does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EASO and makes no political statement whatsoever. The target audience is caseworkers, COI researchers, policy makers, and asylum decision-making authorities. The chronology was finalised on 10 November 2020 and will be updated according to the development of the situation in the region. COI CHRONOLOGY Background Nagorno-Karabakh is a mountainous landlocked region within the borders of Azerbaijan1 and is mainly inhabited by ethnic Armenians.2 Recognized under international law as a part of Azerbaijan,
    [Show full text]
  • View Article(1901)
    Yegana Bakhshiyeva Research fellow at the Institute of Caucasus Studies of Azerbaijan National Academy of Science e-mail: [email protected] THREATS TOWARDS THE HYDROSECURİTY OF THE REPUBLİC OF AZERBAİJAN Açar sözlər: hidro-terror fəaliyyəti, Ermənistanın hədələri, çirklənmiş Kür-Araz hövzəsi, ekoloji mühit, Sərsəng su anbarı. Ключевые слова: гидротеррористическая деятельность, угрозы Армении, загрязненный бассейн рек Кура-Араз, экологическая среда, Сарсангское водохранилище. Key words: hydro-terror action, threats of Armenia, contaminated Kur-Aras basin, ecological environment, Sarsang reservoir. İntroduction Ecological terrorism is one of the concepts that exist in the science of ecology, and it is a deliberate damage with destroying natural resources, flora and fauna by a particular country or individual. Generally, the water-related aspects of the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the international law, as well as the use of fresh water sources and hydrotechnical devices in the conduct of hydrological, hydropower and ecological sabotage actions of the enemy state are not sufficiently studied. The ecological terrorism policy of Armenia against Azerbaijan is quite diverse in terms of its essence and its implementation mechanisms. At the same time, the non-constructive approach shown by international organizations in the Armenian- Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict serves to deteriorate the situation in the region. Armenia, by taking advantage of the dual position of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group for the consensus in the conflict, extends the settlement of the conflict by baseless excuses. By supporting the foreign patrons, official Yerevan is delaying the conclusion of any contract with the regional states on the management, utilization, protection of the transboundary water resources and the determination of the water quota.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggression of the Republic of Armenia Against the Republic of Azerbaijan
    1 AGGRESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN Historical background. The Nagorny Karabakh region of the Republic of Azerbaijan is part of the geographical area called Garabagh (Qarabağ). The name of this part of the country consists of two Azerbaijani words: "qara" (black) and "bag" (garden).1 The geographical area of Karabakh covers the lands from the Araz River in the south to the Kur River in the north, and from the junction of the Kur and Araz Rivers in the east to the eastern ranges of the Lesser Caucasus in the west. From ancient times up to the occupation by Russian Empire in the early 19th century, this region was part of different Azerbaijani states. On 14 May 1805, the Treaty of Kurakchay (1805) between Ibrahim Khan, Khan of Karabakh, and Sisianov, representative of the Russian Emperor, was signed. According to this treaty, the Karabakh khanate came under the Russian rule. The Gulustan peace treaty, signed between Russian Empire and Persia on 12 October 1813, de jure recognized the joining to Russia of the Northern Azerbaijan khanates, with the exception of the Nakhchyvan and Iravan khanates. According to the Turkmanchay peace treaty, signed on 10 February 1828 - at the end of the second Russian-Persian war (1826-1828) - Iran confirmed its relinquishment of Northern Azerbaijan, including the Nakhchyvan and Iravan khanates. After the signing of the Gulustan and Turkmanchay treaties a very rapid mass resettlement of Armenians in the Azerbaijani lands took place and the subsequent artificial territorial division emerged. The First World War also contributed to the increase in the number of Armenians in the South Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Elmi Əsərlər Issn 2223-5124
    NAXÇIVAN DÖVLƏT UNİVERSİTETİ-1967 ELMİ ƏSƏRLƏR İSSN 2223-5124 TƏBİƏT ELMLƏRİ VƏ TİBB SERİYASI SCIENTIFIC WORKS SERIES OF NATURAL SCİENCES AND MEDİCİNE SCIENCES НАУЧНЫЕ ТРУДЫ СЕРИЯ ЕСТЕСТВЕННЫХ НАУК МЕДИЦИНЫ №7(72) 3 NAXÇIVAN, NDU, “QEYRƏT”-2015 NAXÇIVAN DÖVLƏT UNİVERSİTETİ. ELMİ ƏSƏRLƏR, 2015, № 7 (72) NAKHCHIVAN STATE UNIVERSITY. SCIENTIFIC WORKS, 2015, № 7 (72) НАХЧЫВАНСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ. НАУЧНЫЕ ТРУДЫ, 2015, № 7 (72) BİOLOGİYA SALEH MƏHƏRRƏMOV AMEA-nın müxbir üzvü Naxçıvan Dövlət Universiteti [email protected] UOT:635.91 QALXANƏK-DİRÇƏK BİTKİLƏRİNİN ANTİHELMİNT TƏSİRLƏRİ Açar sözlər: qalxanək, dirçək, antihelmint təsir, helmintlər, dərman bitkiləri Key words: qalxanek, dircek, antihelmint affect, helminths, medical plants Ключевые слова: караподиум, живучка, антигельминтное действие, гельминты, лекарственные растения Kimyəvi maddələr alınana qədər dərman bitkiləri ilə müalicə insan və heyvanları müxtəlif zərərvericilərdən mühafizə edən əsas vasitə olubdur. Müalicəvi əhəmiyyətə malik bitkilərin antihelmint təsirlərinin elmi əsasda araşdırılması da qədim tarixə malikdir. Tanınmış tacik alimi Əbu-Əli-İbn-Sina və onun tələbələri bir çox bitkilərin qurd xəstəliklərində tətbiq edilməsi və yüksək dərəcədə səmərə verməsi haqda məlumatlar verib [5]. Dərman bitkiləri patoloji prosesi aradan qaldırmaqla yanaşı orqanizmə stimuledici və kompleks təsir göstərir, müalicə zamanı simptomatik və patogenetik səmərəyə malik olur. Bitkilərin müalicəvi təsirini yaradan maddələrin təsiredici formasını saxlaması onların toplanma, qurudulma
    [Show full text]