Brunelleschi's Dome EDITORIAL STAFF St Editor-In-Chief Carol White

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Brunelleschi's Dome EDITORIAL STAFF St Editor-In-Chief Carol White 21st SCIENCE The Apolb Project of the Renaissance Brunelleschi's Dome EDITORIAL STAFF st Editor-in-Chief Carol White Managing Editor 21 CENTURY Marjorie Mazel Hecht Associate Editors David Cherry SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Marsha Freeman Robert Gallagher Vol.2, No. 4 July-August 198? John Grauerholz, MD Warren Hamerman Ramtanu Maitra Charles B. Stevens Features Books David Cherry 24 Brunelleschi's Dome: Art Director The Apollo Project of the Golden Renaissance Alan Yue Nora Hamerman and Claudio Rossi Advertising Manager The magnificent dome of the Florence Cathedral embodies the Marsha Freeman achievement of Renaissance science—man's increasing dominion over Circulation Manager nature—and of the individuals whose political battles made that Dana Arnest Renaissance possible. SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD Winston Bostick, PhD Brunelleschi and the Quantization of Space John D. Cox, PhD 40 Jean-Michel Dutuit, PhD Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Bertha Farian, MD Brunelleschi's crucial discoveries in the 15th century are relevant today James Frazer, PhD Robert J. Moon, PhD in helping us understand the role of negative curvature in representing Uwe Henke von Parpart the necessity of progress from a lower to a higher phase state. Frank Salisbury, PhD John Seale, MD B.A. Soldano, PhD 46 Was AIDS Deliberately Created? Jonathan Tennenbaum, PhD John Grauerholz, M.D. Col. Molloy Vaughn, USA (ret.) The shocking charge raised by a civil rights leader that AIDS was Daniel R. Wells, PhD developed as a race-specific population control measure is examined in detail by a medical expert. 21st Century Science & Technology (ISSN 0895-6820) is published 6 times a year, every other month, by 21st Century Science Associates, P.O. Box 65473, Washington, D.C. 20035. Tel. (703) News 777-7473. Dedicated to providing accurate and comprehensive information on advanced technol­ ogies and science policy, 21st Century is com­ FUSION REPORT mitted to restoring American scientific and 7 An Interview with Dr. Winston Bostick: technological leadership. 21st Century covers the frontiers of science, focusing on the self-devel­ 'The Jury Is Still Out' on Cold Fusion oping qualities of the physical universe in such 9 Who Fears Fusion? areas as plasma physics—the basis for fusion power—as well as biology and microphysics, and 10 Colliding Beam Fusion System Featured at Aneutronic Meeting including ground-breaking studies of the historical development of science and technology. SPECIAL REPORT Opinions expressed in articles are not neces­ 11 The Myth Behind the Ozone Hole Scare sarily those of 21 st Century Science Associates or the scientific advisory board. BIOLOGY & MEDICINE Subscriptions by mail are $20 for 6 issues or 15 AIDS As a Cross-Species Viral Transfer $38 for 12 issues in the USA and Canada. Airmail subscriptions to other countries are $40 for 6 is­ ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT sues. Payments must be in U.S. currency. 20 The Truth about Solar Energy: It Costs Too Much Address aH correspondence to 21st Century, P.O. Box 65473. Washington, D.C. 20035. ASTRONOMY POSTMASTER: Send address changes to 21st 56 A Way Out of the Quasar Redshift Shambles Century. P.O. Box 65473, Washington, D.C. 20035. FUTURE SCIENTISTS Copyright •© 1989 21st Century Science Associates 61 Do Embryos Need Gravity? Printed in the USA ISSN 0895-6820 Departments On the cover: Photograph of the dome of 2 EDITORIAL 6 VIEWPOINT the Florence Cathedral by Scala/Art Re­ 3 LETTERS 62 BOOKS source; cover design by Virginia Baier. 4 NEWS BRIEFS EDITORIAL The World Needs More People! Without a firm commitment to the core principle of West­ actually need an increasing rate of population growth. ern civilization—the sacredness of human life—any society Why? First, if we are to again become a society of cultural will eventually perish under the weight of its own moral optimism, it is desirable to have one parent at home while degeneracy. Already in the United States today we see num­ the children are young. Yet, today both mothers and fathers bers of people, especially young people, whose minds have are forced to work simply to make ends meet—even in been kidnapped by the degenerate counterculture—its situations of two-parent families. If parents are to spend rock music, drugs, licentiousness, cynicism, and encour­ more time at home supervising their children, then we will agement to suicide. At its worst, this atmosphere encour­ need replacements for them on the job front. ages a receptivity to the barbaric practices of Satanic cults. Second, it is entirely possible in the near future that we In the past quarter century, we have been turned from a can extend the human life span to 120 healthy and produc­ can-do nation, ready to develop and industrialize the tive years. This will take some modest advances in biology, world, to a nation of cultural pessimists. Although most coupled with the availability of adequate nutrition and med­ Americans do not yet endorse the environmentalist lie that ical care for all, from the point of conception on. Even so, holds technology to be an evil in itself, they have become the elderly cannot be expected to work at the same pace confused by the daily barrage of scare stories in the liberal as in their younger years; they should increasingly supply media: The "planet" is in danger, we are told, not just wisdom in place of labor. Thus, their physical needs must because man is a "polluter," but because there are too be met by those individuals still active in the productive many of us. For these Malthusians, there are too many workforce. Unless we increase the number of young peo­ babies being born as well as too many elderly, who have ple being born, the population pyramid will become up­ become an intolerable drain upon a limited resource base. ended, without the numbers of younger workers necessary Such thinking is just plain wrong. The proof that it is to maintain an expanding population of older people. wrong has been demonstrated over the span of human Third, we will need more people in order to fulfill our history, in which the human species has grown from a pop­ mission in space. We will need pioneers to build the first ulation of hundreds of thousands to approximately 5 bil­ colonies—as residents on the Moon or Mars—and we will lion, while life expectancy has jumped from about 20 years, need an expanded workforce here on Earth to back up the in primitive societies, to 74 in America today. Such growth efforts in space. has been possible because mankind has continuously sur­ Fourth, we need many more scientists and engineers. passed the apparent limits to growth at any existing level of This means a longer period of specialized training for our technology by developing new, more advanced technolo­ young people, as well as many more workers in the gies that can support more people who live longer—and tangible-goods-producing sector to back up the efforts of better—than their forebears. these specialists. As productivity increases, the ratio of sci­ Our generation is no exception. As the promise of fusion entists and engineers to the workers needed in the produc­ energy, laser technologies, and high temperature super­ tion sector will increase—a good rule-of-thumb ratio is conductivity shows, we do not lack the necessary techno­ probably 1 to 10. logical potential—only the will to develop it. That the ma­ The present trend, of course, is the opposite: away from jority of people in the world today do not live as well as we the kind of investment in industry and technology that en­ do is the consequence not of their numbers but of our hances productivity—and the diversion of the workforce failure to carry forward the political mission of this nation out of production and into the service sector. These are as our founding fathers meant it. With the level of science low-productivity jobs and they are certainly low paying. and technology available today, there is no question that It is a trend consistent with the postindustrial Malthusian we can support a population of at least 25 billion people society, in which there are fewer people, who live less long quite comfortably. And there is every reason to suppose and less well. that when needed, we will have the technological potential The world needs more people and it needs happy, pro­ on hand to support further increases in population. ductive people—the kind of people who look to the stars We offer an even more controversial proposition: Not for inspiration and who know that they can solve any new only can we support a vastly expanded population, but we problems that come their way. 2 July-August 1989 21st CENTURY EDITORIAL Papers embodying this work are the subscription for 21st Century probably in print by now. This quota­ means that much more in light of such tion is from two abstracts in the Bulle­ grim news. tin of the American Physical Society, Since the sciences and technologi­ Jan. 1988 (33:1, p. 72). cal fields are those that change most In interpreting their findings, the rapidly, having periodicals is a neces­ Heads draw upon their knowledge of sity to stay abreast and for research Letters how relativistic speeds affect the red- purposes. shift-blueshift phenomenon. Motion Shary A. Fukuhara Blueshifted Quasars? transverse to the line of sight produces North Monterey High School a non-Doppler redshift by virtue of Castroville, Calif. To the Editor: time dilation. A star approaching the David Cherry's article, "Redshifts observer may show a redshift unless The Editor Replies and the Spirit of Scientific Inquiry" in the transverse component of its mo We are happy to arrange gift sub­ the May-June 1989 issue was outstand­ tion is exactly zero.
Recommended publications
  • Nathaniel Rich's Losing Earth and the Role of William Nierenberg And
    Nathaniel Rich’s Losing Earth and the Role of William Nierenberg and Other Science Advisors: Why didn’t we act on climate change in the 1980s? Ed Levy The entire New York Times Magazine of August 5, 2018 was devoted to an important article by Nathaniel Rich, Losing Earth: The Decade we almost stopped climate Change. In Rich’s account from 1979 to 1989 the United States came close to “breaking our suicide pact with fossil fuels.”1 Rich shows that at the beginning of that decade a broad international consensus had developed favoring action in the form of a global treaty to curb emissions and that U.S. leadership was required and possibly forthcoming. Yet at the end of the decade it was clear that these efforts had failed. Rich sets as his primary task answering the question, “Why didn’t we act?” He does not provide a satisfactory answer. However, Rich’s informative and nuanced accounts convey well the shifting positions about climate change in the US during the decade. At the beginning it was difficult to get widespread attention, later it looked as though linking global warming to other issues such as ozone depletion and CFCs could result in action. These accounts are based on a large number of interviews and extensive research, but the story is told primarily through the eyes of two significant players, Rafe Pomerance and James Hansen, “a hyperkinetic lobbyist and a guileless atmospheric physicist who, at great personal cost, tried to warn humanity of what was coming.” Still, Rich barely addresses the central question explicitly and does not come close to providing a convincing answer.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Theory of Climate Denial Peter J
    A General Theory of Climate Denial Peter J. Jacques A General Theory of Climate Denial • Peter J. Jacques There is now a well-recognized right-wing counter-movement challenging the trend, attribution, impact, and civic implications of orthodox climate change science. Where do the body and spirit of this counter-movement come from? Here I will reºect on some conspicuous questions. First, why have academics, the media, and the counter-movement itself had difªculty naming the counter- movement? Second, why reject the premise of global environmental change at all? Finally, what is the result of the apparent binary choice between the ac- knowledgment of the orthodoxy and its rejection? A General Theory of Denial I will argue that climate denial is an appropriate label consistent with Lang’s “General Theory of Historical Denial.”1 Currently, there is disagreement whether climate “skeptic,” “contrarian,” and “denier” are representative terms.2 I have used the word “skeptic,” but I admit here and elsewhere that it is inappro- priate,3 because the skepticism in environmental skepticism is asymmetrical. As skeptics cast doubt on ecological science, they have an abiding faith in industrial science and technology, free enterprise, and those great institutions of Western Enlightenment.4 Further, skeptics rightfully argue that skepticism is a funda- mental sentiment of rigorous science. Ecological cynicism is then positioned as scientiªc without drawing attention to the asymmetry. Lahsen has successfully used the word “contrarian” to denote the most outspoken leaders of climate rejection, particularly credentialed physicists and climate scientists such as Frederick Seitz, Robert Jastrow, William Nierenberg, Willie Soon, and Sallie Balliunas.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Census of Marine Life Participants 2000-2010
    Census of Marine Life Participants 2000-2010 Raza Abidi, Dalhousie University, Canada Jo Acebes, Asia Research Center, Philippines Arturo Acero, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia Shanta Nair Achuthankutty, National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research, India C.T. Achuthankutty, National Institute of Oceanography, India Colleen Adam, DIVERSITAS, France Sarah Adamowicz, University of Guelph, Canada Nathan Adams, United States Helena Adão, University of Évora, Portugal Adrian Aebischer, University of Bern and Museum Fribourg, Switzerland Steven Africk, Acentech Inc, United States Vikram Agadi, National Institute Scientific Communication & Information Resources, India Yogi Agrawal, Sequoia Scientific, United States Maite Aguado, Universidad Autonóma de Madrid, Spain Anelio Aguayo-Lobo, Instituto Antarctico Chileno, Chile Paula Aguiar, University of the Azores, Portugal John Ahearn, Museum Victoria, Australia Sayyed Ahmed, Sultan Qaboos University, Sultanate of Oman Shane Ahyong, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), New Zealand Jim Aiken, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, United Kingdom Cameron Ainsworth, University of British Columbia, Canada Laura Airoldi, Università di Bologna, Italy Belinda Aker, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom Dag Aksnes, University of Bergen, Norway Farid Al-Abdali, Five Oceans LLC, Sultanate of Oman Nasser Al-Azri, HMR Environmental Engineering Cunsultants, Sultanate of Oman Adnan Al-Azri, Sultan Qaboos University, Sultanate of Oman Monica Albuquerque, University Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Portugal Jacqueline Alder, UNEP, Kenya Viviana Alder, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina Juan Luis Aleget, Universitat de Girona, Spain Yaroslava Alekseeva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia Vera Alexander, University of Alaska Fairbanks, United States Karen Alexander, University of New Hampshire, United States Daniel Alexandrov, European University at St. Petersburg, Russia J.R.B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Tourist Physics and New York City
    Phys. perspect. 5 (2003) 87–121 © Birkha¨user Verlag, Basel, 2003 1422–6944/05/010087–35 The Physical Tourist Physics and New York City Benjamin Bederson* I discuss the contributions of physicists who have lived and worked in New York City within the context of the high schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions with which they were and are associated. I close with a walking tour of major sites of interest in Manhattan. Key words: Thomas A. Edison; Nikola Tesla; Michael I. Pupin; Hall of Fame for GreatAmericans;AlbertEinstein;OttoStern;HenryGoldman;J.RobertOppenheimer; Richard P. Feynman; Julian Schwinger; Isidor I. Rabi; Bronx High School of Science; StuyvesantHighSchool;TownsendHarrisHighSchool;NewYorkAcademyofSciences; Andrei Sakharov; Fordham University; Victor F. Hess; Cooper Union; Peter Cooper; City University of New York; City College; Brooklyn College; Melba Phillips; Hunter College; Rosalyn Yalow; Queens College; Lehman College; New York University; Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences; Samuel F.B. Morse; John W. Draper; Columbia University; Polytechnic University; Manhattan Project; American Museum of Natural History; Rockefeller University; New York Public Library. Introduction When I was approached by the editors of Physics in Perspecti6e to prepare an article on New York City for The Physical Tourist section, I was happy to do so. I have been a New Yorker all my life, except for short-term stays elsewhere on sabbatical leaves and other visits. My professional life developed in New York, and I married and raised my family in New York and its environs. Accordingly, writing such an article seemed a natural thing to do. About halfway through its preparation, however, the attack on the World Trade Center took place.
    [Show full text]
  • National Academy of Sciences July 1, 1979 Officers
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JULY 1, 1979 OFFICERS Term expires President-PHILIP HANDLER June 30, 1981 Vice-President-SAUNDERS MAC LANE June 30, 1981 Home Secretary-BRYCE CRAWFORD,JR. June 30, 1983 Foreign Secretary-THOMAS F. MALONE June 30, 1982 Treasurer-E. R. PIORE June 30, 1980 Executive Officer Comptroller Robert M. White David Williams COUNCIL Abelson, Philip H. (1981) Markert,C. L. (1980) Berg, Paul (1982) Nierenberg,William A. (1982) Berliner, Robert W. (1981) Piore, E. R. (1980) Bing, R. H. (1980) Ranney, H. M. (1980) Crawford,Bryce, Jr. (1983) Simon, Herbert A. (1981) Friedman, Herbert (1982) Solow, R. M. (1980) Handler, Philip (1981) Thomas, Lewis (1982) Mac Lane, Saunders (1981) Townes, Charles H. (1981) Malone, Thomas F. (1982) Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 SECTIONS The Academyis divided into the followingSections, to which membersare assigned at their own choice: (11) Mathematics (31) Engineering (12) Astronomy (32) Applied Biology (13) Physics (33) Applied Physical and (14) Chemistry Mathematical Sciences (15) Geology (41) Medical Genetics Hema- (16) Geophysics tology, and Oncology (21) Biochemistry (42) Medical Physiology, En- (22) Cellularand Develop- docrinology,and Me- mental Biology tabolism (23) Physiological and Phar- (43) Medical Microbiology macologicalSciences and Immunology (24) Neurobiology (51) Anthropology (25) Botany (52) Psychology (26) Genetics (53) Social and Political Sci- (27) Population Biology, Evo- ences lution, and Ecology (54) Economic Sciences In the alphabetical list of members,the numbersin parentheses, followingyear of election, indicate the respective Class and Section of the member. CLASSES The members of Sections are grouped in the following Classes: I. Physical and Mathematical Sciences (Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The new prophet : Harold C. Urey, scientist, atheist, and defender of religion Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j80v92j Author Shindell, Matthew Benjamin Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The New Prophet: Harold C. Urey, Scientist, Atheist, and Defender of Religion A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Matthew Benjamin Shindell Committee in charge: Professor Naomi Oreskes, Chair Professor Robert Edelman Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charles Thorpe Professor Robert Westman 2011 Copyright Matthew Benjamin Shindell, 2011 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Matthew Benjamin Shindell is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………...... iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………. iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Analysis of a Physicist ''Trio'' Supporting the Backlash Against
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Global Environmental Change 18 (2008) 204–219 www.elsevier.com/locate/gloenvcha Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist ‘‘trio’’ supporting the backlash against global warming Myanna Lahsenà Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado and Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Epaciais (INPE), Av. dos Astronautas, 1758, Sa˜o Jose´ dos Campos, SP 12227-010 Brazil Received 18 March 2007; received in revised form 5 October 2007; accepted 29 October 2007 Abstract This paper identifies cultural and historical dimensions that structure US climate science politics. It explores why a key subset of scientists—the physicist founders and leaders of the influential George C. Marshall Institute—chose to lend their scientific authority to this movement which continues to powerfully shape US climate policy. The paper suggests that these physicists joined the environmental backlash to stem changing tides in science and society, and to defend their preferred understandings of science, modernity, and of themselves as a physicist elite—understandings challenged by on-going transformations encapsulated by the widespread concern about human-induced climate change. r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Anti-environmental movement; Human dimensions research; Climate change; Controversy; United States; George C. Marshall Institute 1. Introduction change itself, what he termed a ‘‘strong theory of culture.’’ Arguing that the essential role of science in our present age Human Dimensions Research in the area of global only can be fully understood through examination of environmental change tends to integrate a limited con- individuals’ relationships with each other and with ‘‘mean- ceptualization of culture.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improbable Venture
    AN IMPROBABLE VENTURE A HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO NANCY SCOTT ANDERSON THE UCSD PRESS LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA © 1993 by The Regents of the University of California and Nancy Scott Anderson All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Anderson, Nancy Scott. An improbable venture: a history of the University of California, San Diego/ Nancy Scott Anderson 302 p. (not including index) Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-302) and index 1. University of California, San Diego—History. 2. Universities and colleges—California—San Diego. I. University of California, San Diego LD781.S2A65 1993 93-61345 Text typeset in 10/14 pt. Goudy by Prepress Services, University of California, San Diego. Printed and bound by Graphics and Reproduction Services, University of California, San Diego. Cover designed by the Publications Office of University Communications, University of California, San Diego. CONTENTS Foreword.................................................................................................................i Preface.........................................................................................................................v Introduction: The Model and Its Mechanism ............................................................... 1 Chapter One: Ocean Origins ...................................................................................... 15 Chapter Two: A Cathedral on a Bluff ......................................................................... 37 Chapter Three:
    [Show full text]
  • Ipcc), 1979-1992
    Negotiating Climates: The Politics of Climate Change and the Formation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1979-1992 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of PhD in the Faculty of Life Sciences 2014 David George Hirst Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Declaration ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Copyright Statement ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Key Figures in Thesis .................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Acronyms............................................................................................................................................ 10 Chapter 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 11 1. Aims of thesis .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dixy Lee Ray, Marine Biology, and the Public Understanding of Science in the United States (1930-1970)
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Erik Ellis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the History of Science presented on November 21. 2005. Title: Dixy Lee Ray. Marine Biology, and the Public Understanding of Science in the United States (1930-1970) Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy This dissertation focuses on the life of Dixy Lee Ray as it examines important developments in marine biology and biological oceanography during the mid twentieth century. In addition, Ray's key involvement in the public understanding of science movement of the l950s and 1960s provides a larger social and cultural context for studying and analyzing scientists' motivations during the period of the early Cold War in the United States. The dissertation is informed throughout by the notion that science is a deeply embedded aspect of Western culture. To understand American science and society in the mid twentieth century it is instructive, then, to analyze individuals who were seen as influential and who reflected widely held cultural values at that time. Dixy Lee Ray was one of those individuals. Yet, instead of remaining a prominent and enduring figure in American history, she has disappeared rapidly from historical memory, and especially from the history of science. It is this very characteristic of reflecting her time, rather than possessing a timeless appeal, that makes Ray an effective historical guide into the recent past. Her career brings into focus some of the significant ways in which American science and society shifted over the course of the Cold War. Beginning with Ray's early life in West Coast society of the1920sandl930s, this study traces Ray's formal education, her entry into the professional ranks of marine biology and the crucial role she played in broadening the scope of biological oceanography in the early1960s.The dissertation then analyzes Ray's efforts in public science education, through educational television, at the science and technology themed Seattle World's Fair, and finally in her leadership of the Pacific Science Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuroda Papers:” Translation and Commentary
    The “Kuroda Papers:” Translation and Commentary. Dwight R. Rider, Dr. Eric Hehl and Wes Injerd. 30 April 2017 The “Kuroda Papers:” The Kuroda Papers (See: Appendix 1), a set of notes concerning wartime meetings covering issues related to Japan’s atomic energy and weapons program, remain one of the few documents concerning that nation’s wartime bomb program to ever surface. 1 The pages available, detail the background papers supporting the research program and four meetings, one each. held on; 2 July 1943, 6 July 1943, 2 Feb 1944 and 17 Nov 1944 however, these dates may be inaccurate. Kuroda himself had given a copy of the documents to P. Wayne Reagan in the mid-1950s. 2 Knowledge of the papers held by Paul Kuroda was known in some larger circles as early as 1985. According to Mrs. Kuroda’s cover letter returning the papers to Japan, she stated that “Kuroda lectured about the documents to his students and also publicly discussed their existence at international conferences such as the one commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Discovery of Nuclear Fission in Washington D.C. in 1989, presided over by Professor Glenn Seaborg.” 3 Kuroda is reported to have on occasion; altered, corrected, or edited these papers in the presence of his students at the University of Arkansas during some of his lectures. It is unknown exactly what information contained within the papers Kuroda changed, or his motivations for altering or correcting these notes. The Kuroda Papers were never the property of the Imperial Japanese government, or it’s military, during the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Harold Clayton Urey Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf4c6006zq Online items available Harold Clayton Urey Papers Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego Copyright 2005 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla 92093-0175 [email protected] URL: http://libraries.ucsd.edu/collections/sca/index.html Harold Clayton Urey Papers MSS 0044 1 Descriptive Summary Languages: English Contributing Institution: Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla 92093-0175 Title: Harold Clayton Urey Papers Identifier/Call Number: MSS 0044 Physical Description: 90.3 Linear feet(157 archives boxes, 34 flat boxes, 5 card file boxes, 1 carton, and 9 art bin items) Date (inclusive): 1924-1981 (bulk 1958-1978) Abstract: Papers of Harold Clayton Urey, Nobel Prize-winning chemist who contributed to significant advances in the fields of physical chemistry, geochemistry, lunar science, and astrochemistry. He received the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1934 for his discovery of deuterium, and made key scientific contributions to the development of the atomic bomb during World War II. The papers span the years 1929 to 1981 and contain significant correspondence with Urey's fellow scientists, including Albert Einstein, Enrico Fermi, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Leo Szilard, and Edward Teller. Scope and Content of Collection Papers of Harold Clayton Urey, Nobel Prize-winning chemist who contributed to significant advances in the fields of physical chemistry, geochemistry, lunar science, and astrochemistry. He received the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1934 for his discovery of deuterium, and made key scientific contributions to the development of the atomic bomb during World War II.
    [Show full text]