DOCSLIB.ORG

UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The new prophet : Harold C. Urey, scientist, atheist, and defender of religion Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j80v92j Author Shindell, Matthew Benjamin Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The New Prophet: Harold C. Urey, Scientist, Atheist, and Defender of Religion A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Matthew Benjamin Shindell Committee in charge: Professor Naomi Oreskes, Chair Professor Robert Edelman Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charles Thorpe Professor Robert Westman 2011 Copyright Matthew Benjamin Shindell, 2011 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Matthew Benjamin Shindell is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………...... iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………. iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….. v Vita…………………………………………………………………………………... xi Abstract………………………………………………………………………………. xii Introduction………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Chapter 1, The Making and Remaking of an American Chemist: From a Country Boyhood to World War I………………………………… 25 Chapter 2, Farm Life and Scientific Stardom: From the Barrett Chemical Company to World War II……………………………………. 94 Chapter 3, Atomic Trauma and New Territory: The Rise of Nuclear Geochemistry in Chicago……………………………………… 162 Chapter 4, Calling for the New Prophet: A Skeptic Argues for the Importance of Religion………………………………………………. 213 Chapter 5, To Hell with the Moon: The Cosmochemist’s Failed Quest for a Rosetta Stone……………………………... 262 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………… 312 Works Cited………………………………………………………………………….. 316 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although I am the sole author of this dissertation, it could never have been written without the help of many individuals. First and foremost, I must thank the chair of my committee and my adviser for the last seven years, Naomi Oreskes. Although I first appeared in Professor Oreskes’s office declaring that my intention was to write a dissertation on the history of planetary geology, she has supported every turn that my research has taken and has provided invaluable support and feedback. My understanding of Cold War science and my emphasis of Cold War causality are both due to Professor Oreskes’s guidance and encouragement. I might never have imagined writing a dissertation related to the problem of science and religion during the Cold War if not for another member of my committee, Robert Westman. It was in Professor Westman’s science and religion research seminar that I first approached the Urey papers. Chapter 4 of this dissertation is a revised version of my initial entry into this question in this seminar. As an instructor, Professor Westman also introduced me to the history of the field of science studies and encouraged me to believe that history might have a unique role to play in this field in the years to come. Two other members of my committee – both members of the Science Studies Program – have helped to form my understanding of the social, cultural, and political nature of science: Martha Lampland and Charles Thorpe. I was fortunate enough to enjoy Professor Lampland as an instructor in multiple science studies courses. She is probably the most reflexive and honest social scientist I have ever met, and I have always appreciated her advice on methods and argumentation. Professor Thorpe, although he joined the faculty after I had already finished my coursework, provided in his social v biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer a wonderful model for my analysis of Urey as a Cold War figure. In revisiting my training in science studies, I must also mention two faculty members who, although they have since left the Science Studies Program, advised me during my science studies minor field work: Andrew Lakoff and Steven Epstein. I have Professors Lakoff and Epstein to thank for my understanding of the intellectual foundations of the sociological and anthropological study of science. My final committee member, Robert Edelman, advised me in my study of Russian and Soviet history. It seemed unreasonable to study the Cold War from only the US perspective, and Professor Edelman allowed me to define a course of study that combined the social and cultural history of the Soviet Union with the history of Russian and Soviet science. This work was of course helpful in the ways that I had hoped, but it also gave me a much better grasp of the use of social and cultural methods in history than I would otherwise possess. I also have our discussions to thank for my understanding of the construction and evolution of the American intellectual critique of totalitarianism, an early prewar version of which appears in this dissertation. I would like to thank the UCSD Science Studies Program for providing an incredible intellectual atmosphere within which to train, and also for providing financial support at various times throughout my time at UCSD. Some of this money was provided to the Science Studies Program and came originally from a private endowment from the estate of Rik and Flo Henrikson. I am grateful for the Henrikson’s original decision to support research at UCSD, and also to the current trustee of the estate, Tony Dimitroff, for taking an interest in the Science Studies Program. I would also like to thank the UC Humanities Network for having me as one of its predoctoral Humanities Research vi Fellows. UCSD’s Kenneth and Dorothy Hill Fellowship funded the final year of my research in the Urey papers. Thanks to the support of a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant, I was able to afford necessary research materials, travel, and spend time in several relevant archives. For one year during my research for this dissertation, I was a Haas Predoctoral Fellow at the Chemical Heritage Foundation in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Thanks also go to the History of Science Society and the Society for the Social Studies of Science for providing travel funding that made it possible for me to present my research at conferences during my graduate training. Finally, thanks to the UCSD Friends of the International Center and the UCSD Department of History for helping to fund a research trip to Russia. Outside of my professors, there are also many librarians and archivists to thank. My primary archive for this research project has been the Mandeville Special Collections Library (MSCL) here at UCSD, where the papers of Urey and his La Jolla colleagues are deposited. Lynda Claassen, the department head of MSCL, has been an invaluable resource in navigating the Urey papers, as has her incomparable staff. I have probably gotten to know them better than most researchers over the past several years, and have even supported myself during some summers by assisting them. This has only made me appreciate what they do and how essential they are all the more. Urey’s career was spent at multiple institutions on the East and West Coasts. In New York I visited Columbia University where I had the assistance of Gerald Cloud in the Rare Book and Manuscript Library and Courtney Smith in the Oral History Research Office. Thank you to Harriet Zuckerman for granting me permission to use the oral history interview that she conducted with Urey. While in New York I also visited the vii Jewish Theological Seminary of America, where Sarah Diamant assisted me with the papers of the Conference on Science, Philosophy, and Religion. At the University of Chicago’s Special Collections Research Center, directed by Alice Schreyer, I was happy to have the knowledgeable guidance of Julia Gardner. Also in Chicago, discussions with two of Urey’s younger colleagues at the Institute for Nuclear Studies (now known as the Enrico Fermi Institute), Roger Hildebrand and Robert N. Clayton, helped me to understand the structure and atmosphere of the Institute during its early years. It was Clayton who first emphasized to me the importance of mass spectrometer development in the immediate postwar years, and encouraged me to take a closer look at Samuel Epstein’s papers at Caltech. At the Caltech Archives, headed by Shelley Erwin, I was assisted primarily by Loma Karklins. In Washington DC, I spent time at NASA’s History Division with its then Director Steven J. Dick and his knowledgeable staff of historians and archivists. In the Ava Helen and Linus Pauling Papers, held at Oregon State University, I enjoyed the assistance of the Head of Special Collections, Cliff Mead, and Faculty Research Assistant Chris Petersen. The American Institute of Physics Center for the History of Physics has been very helpful in providing Urey’s oral history interview, conducted by John Heilbron, as well as transcripts of Ian I. Mitroff’s interviews with Urey during NASA’s Apollo program. At the AIP I wish to thank Scott Prouty and Mark Matienzo. During my year in Philadelphia at the Chemical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revisiting One World Or None
    Revisiting One World or None. Sixty years ago, atomic energy was new and the world was still reverberating from the shocks of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Immediately after the end of the Second World War, the first instinct of the administration and Congress was to protect the “secret” of the atomic bomb. The atomic scientists—what today would be called nuclear physicists— who had worked on the Manhattan project to develop atomic bombs recognized that there was no secret, that any technically advanced nation could, with adequate resources, reproduce what they had done. They further believed that when a single aircraft, eventually a single missile, armed with a single bomb could destroy an entire city, no defense system would ever be adequate. Given this combination, the world seemed headed for a period of unprecedented danger. Many of the scientists who had worked on the Manhattan Project felt a special responsibility to encourage a public debate about these new and terrifying products of modern science. They formed an organization, the Federation of Atomic Scientists, dedicated to avoiding the threat of nuclear weapons and nuclear proliferation. Convinced that neither guarding the nuclear “secret” nor any defense could keep the world safe, they encouraged international openness in nuclear physics research and in the expected nuclear power industry as the only way to avoid a disastrous arms race in nuclear weapons. William Higinbotham, the first Chairman of the Association of Los Alamos Scientists and the first Chairman of the Federation of Atomic Scientists, wanted to expand the organization beyond those who had worked on the Manhattan Project, for two reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008
    Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Paul Harold Rubinson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War Committee: —————————————————— Mark A. Lawrence, Supervisor —————————————————— Francis J. Gavin —————————————————— Bruce J. Hunt —————————————————— David M. Oshinsky —————————————————— Michael B. Stoff Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War by Paul Harold Rubinson, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Acknowledgements Thanks first and foremost to Mark Lawrence for his guidance, support, and enthusiasm throughout this project. It would be impossible to overstate how essential his insight and mentoring have been to this dissertation and my career in general. Just as important has been his camaraderie, which made the researching and writing of this dissertation infinitely more rewarding. Thanks as well to Bruce Hunt for his support. Especially helpful was his incisive feedback, which both encouraged me to think through my ideas more thoroughly, and reined me in when my writing overshot my argument. I offer my sincerest gratitude to the Smith Richardson Foundation and Yale University International Security Studies for the Predoctoral Fellowship that allowed me to do the bulk of the writing of this dissertation. Thanks also to the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy at Yale University, and John Gaddis and the incomparable Ann Carter-Drier at ISS.
    [Show full text]
  • Goessmann, Lindsey, Chamberlain, Peters, and Mcewen, Research Symposium
    GOE SSMANNgazette A Publication of the Chemistry Department University of Massachusetts Amherst www.chem.umass.edu VOLUME 44 – SPRING 2015 INSIDE Alumni News ............................2 by David Adams Points of Pride ...........................4 Chemistry Loses a Dear Friend Lab Notes .................................5 Dissertation Seminars .............21 On April 14th one of the towering figures of the Chemistry Seminar Program ....................20 Department, Professor George R. Richason, Jr. passed away Senior Awards Dinner .............22 at Cooley Dickinson Hospital in Northampton. Alongside Degrees Awarded ...................22 Goessmann, Lindsey, Chamberlain, Peters, and McEwen, Research Symposium ..............23 George takes his place among the chemists who shaped Friends of Chemistry ...............26 and propelled the department to national and international Letter from Head ....................28 quality and recognition. In George’s case, he was part of EVENTS for 2015 the Chemistry Department for 82 of its 146 year history! His contributions to the department and the university Five College Seminar were profound, widespread, and legendary. In many Prof. Phil Baran Scripps Institute respects he truly was “Mr. UMass.” March 10, 2015 In the early 1930s, George, born in the Riverside Marvin Rausch Lectureship Prof. Karl Wieghardt section of Turner’s Falls on April 3, 1916, participated in Max-Planck-Institut-Mülheim basketball tournaments on the Amherst campus of the then April 9, 2015 Massachusetts Agricultural College (MAC). MAC became Senior Awards Dinner Massachusetts State College in 1931, and George April 29, 2015 matriculated at MSC in the fall of 1933. Early in his undergraduate career the basketball coach Getting to Know Our Newest Alumni Reunion 2015 June 6, 2015 encouraged him to join the State basketball team Faculty Members after watching him play in Curry Hicks Cage.
    [Show full text]
  • I. I. Rabi Papers [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress. [PDF Rendered Tue Apr
    I. I. Rabi Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 1992 Revised 2010 March Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms998009 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm89076467 Prepared by Joseph Sullivan with the assistance of Kathleen A. Kelly and John R. Monagle Collection Summary Title: I. I. Rabi Papers Span Dates: 1899-1989 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1945-1968) ID No.: MSS76467 Creator: Rabi, I. I. (Isador Isaac), 1898- Extent: 41,500 items ; 105 cartons plus 1 oversize plus 4 classified ; 42 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Physicist and educator. The collection documents Rabi's research in physics, particularly in the fields of radar and nuclear energy, leading to the development of lasers, atomic clocks, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to his 1944 Nobel Prize in physics; his work as a consultant to the atomic bomb project at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory and as an advisor on science policy to the United States government, the United Nations, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization during and after World War II; and his studies, research, and professorships in physics chiefly at Columbia University and also at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Sterns Lebensdaten Und Chronologie Seines Wirkens
    Sterns Lebensdaten und Chronologie seines Wirkens Diese Chronologie von Otto Sterns Wirken basiert auf folgenden Quellen: 1. Otto Sterns selbst verfassten Lebensläufen, 2. Sterns Briefen und Sterns Publikationen, 3. Sterns Reisepässen 4. Sterns Züricher Interview 1961 5. Dokumenten der Hochschularchive (17.2.1888 bis 17.8.1969) 1888 Geb. 17.2.1888 als Otto Stern in Sohrau/Oberschlesien In allen Lebensläufen und Dokumenten findet man immer nur den VornamenOt- to. Im polizeilichen Führungszeugnis ausgestellt am 12.7.1912 vom königlichen Polizeipräsidium Abt. IV in Breslau wird bei Stern ebenfalls nur der Vorname Otto erwähnt. Nur im Emeritierungsdokument des Carnegie Institutes of Tech- nology wird ein zweiter Vorname Otto M. Stern erwähnt. Vater: Mühlenbesitzer Oskar Stern (*1850–1919) und Mutter Eugenie Stern geb. Rosenthal (*1863–1907) Nach Angabe von Diana Templeton-Killan, der Enkeltochter von Berta Kamm und somit Großnichte von Otto Stern (E-Mail vom 3.12.2015 an Horst Schmidt- Böcking) war Ottos Großvater Abraham Stern. Abraham hatte 5 Kinder mit seiner ersten Frau Nanni Freund. Nanni starb kurz nach der Geburt des fünften Kindes. Bald danach heiratete Abraham Berta Ben- der, mit der er 6 weitere Kinder hatte. Ottos Vater Oskar war das dritte Kind von Berta. Abraham und Nannis erstes Kind war Heinrich Stern (1833–1908). Heinrich hatte 4 Kinder. Das erste Kind war Richard Stern (1865–1911), der Toni Asch © Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018 325 H. Schmidt-Böcking, A. Templeton, W. Trageser (Hrsg.), Otto Sterns gesammelte Briefe – Band 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55735-8 326 Sterns Lebensdaten und Chronologie seines Wirkens heiratete.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Committee Meeting 6:00 Pm, November 22, 2008 Marriott Rivercenter Hotel
    Executive Committee Meeting 6:00 pm, November 22, 2008 Marriott Rivercenter Hotel Attendees: Steve Pope, Lex Smits, Phil Marcus, Ellen Longmire, Juan Lasheras, Anette Hosoi, Laurette Tuckerman, Jim Brasseur, Paul Steen, Minami Yoda, Martin Maxey, Jean Hertzberg, Monica Malouf, Ken Kiger, Sharath Girimaji, Krishnan Mahesh, Gary Leal, Bill Schultz, Andrea Prosperetti, Julian Domaradzki, Jim Duncan, John Foss, PK Yeung, Ann Karagozian, Lance Collins, Kimberly Hill, Peggy Holland, Jason Bardi (AIP) Note: Attachments related to agenda items follow the order of the agenda and are appended to this document. Key Decisions The ExCom voted to move $100k of operating funds to an endowment for a new award. The ExCom voted that a new name (not Otto Laporte) should be chosen for this award. In the coming year, the Award committee (currently the Fluid Dynamics Prize committee) should establish the award criteria, making sure to distinguish the criteria from those associated with the Batchelor prize. The committee should suggest appropriate wording for the award application and make a recommendation on the naming of the award. The ExCom voted to move Newsletter publication to the first weeks of June and December each year. The ExCom voted to continue the Ad Hoc Committee on Media and Public Relations for two more years (through 2010). The ExCom voted that $15,000 per year in 2009 and 2010 be allocated for Media and Public Relations activities. Most of these funds would be applied toward continuing to use AIP media services in support of news releases and Virtual Pressroom activities related to the annual DFD meeting. Meeting Discussion 1.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT NIX, ANISHA MAHESH. Investigating
    ABSTRACT NIX, ANISHA MAHESH. Investigating the Links Among Stereotypes, Self-Image, and Career Commitment to the Sciences. (Under the direction of Mary B. Wyer). Women have historically been underrepresented in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. One reason for this continued underrepresentation might be existing stereotypes of STEM fields, as well as the lack of historical role models within these fields. A longitudinal analysis conducted over a one- semester period in an introductory Chemistry course was conducted to explore the effects of a curriculum intervention that introduced the contributions of women to chemistry on students’ stereotypes about STEM fields, self perceptions, and their commitment to STEM fields. Results indicate that stereotypes about scientists in this sample include masculine, feminine, and neutral characteristics and that there was some change in stereotypes after the intervention. Furthermore, women in the sample had higher career commitment to the sciences than men and women who were STEM majors had a better fit between stereotypes and self perceptions than did women who were not STEM majors. Investigating the Links Among Stereotypes, Self-Image, and Career Commitment to the Sciences by Anisha Mahesh Nix A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Psychology Raleigh, North Carolina 2009 APPROVED BY: _______________________________ ______________________________ Dennis O. Gray Shevaun Neupert ________________________________ Mary B. Wyer Chair of Advisory Committee DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my family. To my mother, whose support and guidance have been invaluable in my education and my life.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science
    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
    [Show full text]
  • LA JOLLA MAIL PO Box 2085 La Jolla, CA 92038 HISTORICAL SOCIETY OFFICE & RESEARCH 7846 Eads Ave .• EXHIBIT GALLERIES 780 Prospect St
    w LA JOLLA MAIL PO Box 2085 La Jolla, CA 92038 HISTORICAL SOCIETY OFFICE & RESEARCH 7846 Eads Ave .• EXHIBIT GALLERIES 780 Prospect St. T 858.459.5335 • lajollahistory.org July 5, 2016 Suzanne Segur San Diego Planning Department 1010 Second A venue, Suite 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 RE: Historical Report for 2345 Via Sienna, La Jolla Dear Ms. Segur: The La Jolla Historical Society recommends that 2345 Via Sienna be considered for designation as a historically significant under HRB Criterion B for its association with Dr. Maria Goeppert-Mayer, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics while living in the property. Maria Goeppert-Mayer is one of only two females awarded the Nobel Prize for physics since its inception in 1901. (The other was Mme. Curie, who was awarded the prize in 1903.) In fact, only 49 women have EVER won the Nobel Prize in ANYTHING, as opposed to 822 men. Ms. Goeppert-Mayer's biographies provide evidence regarding the difficulty she had in being taken seriously as a scientist because of her gender. It was with her hiring at UC San Diego that she became a full-time faculty professor, earning the respect her training and achievements deserved. We believe Dr. Goeppert-Mayer's home is eligible for designation under Criterion B as defined in the Department of Interior Standards. Although the residence may read today as an interpretation of the mid-century era's California ranch style, it is not atypical of the kind of housing many UCSD professors and members of La Jolla's new scientific community resided in at the time - modest dwellings in tune with economic situations and their new lives as Californians enjoying the amenable climate of the West Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2002 NEWS Volume 11, No
    April 2002 NEWS Volume 11, No. 4 A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews Executive Board Expresses Concern Over Funding Imbalance In Bush Administration’s FY2003 Budget Request When President Bush unveiled outside of the scientific community tire research budget of the National for physical science remains es- his FY 2003 budget request for have expressed concern at the im- Science Foundation, in keeping sentially flat, the APS Executive The Executive Board of the R&D in February, no one was sur- balance of research funding with the president’s campaign bud- Board approved a resolution re- American Physical Society ap- prised at the emphasis on priorities in favor of the biological get to double the NIH budget by garding the FY2003 budget plauds the proposed increased antiterrorist, and on homeland sciences. 2003. request at its meeting on Febru- for the NIH and for life sciences and economic security in the wake For example, the National Insti- Noting that while funding for ary 23, 2002. The full text of the generally in the FY2003 Bud- of the September 11th attacks. How- tutes of Health would receive a $3.9 biological and medical research Executive Board statement is con- get Request submitted by President Bush on February 4, ever, many both within and billion increase, larger than the en- continues to increase, funding tained in the box at the right. 2002. However, the Board ex- presses great concern about Task Force to Weigh Pros the requested budgetary lev- Outlook on FY 2003 Budget Bills els for research in the physi- cal sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Education at the University of California: the First Fifty Years
    fORESTRY EDUCRTIOfl T THE UflIVERSITY Of CALIFORflffl The first fifty Years PAUL CASAMAJOR, Editor Published by the California Alumni Foresters Berkeley, California 1965 fOEUJOD T1HEhistory of an educational institution is peculiarly that of the men who made it and of the men it has helped tomake. This books tells the story of the School of Forestry at the University of California in such terms. The end of the first 50 years oi forestry education at Berkeley pro ides a unique moment to look back at what has beenachieved. A remarkable number of those who occupied key roles in establishing the forestry cur- riculum are with us today to throw the light of personal recollection and insight on these five decades. In addition, time has already given perspective to the accomplishments of many graduates. The School owes much to the California Alumni Foresters Association for their interest in seizing this opportunity. Without the initiative and sustained effort that the alunmi gave to the task, the opportunity would have been lost and the School would have been denied a valuable recapitulation of its past. Although this book is called a history, this name may be both unfair and misleading. If it were about an individual instead of an institution it might better be called a personal memoir. Those who have been most con- cerned with the task of writing it have perhaps been too close to the School to provide objective history. But if anything is lost on this score, it is more than regained by the personalized nature of the account.
    [Show full text]