World Health Organization Discontinues Relations with World Medical Association
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
World Health Organization Discontinues Relations with World Medical Association http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.nuun1982_04 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org World Health Organization Discontinues Relations with World Medical Association Alternative title Notes and Documents - United Nations Centre Against ApartheidNo. 4/82 Author/Creator United Nations Centre against Apartheid Publisher United Nations, New York Date 1982-02-00 Resource type Reports Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa Coverage (temporal) 1981 - 1982 Source Northwestern University Libraries Description The World Medical Association (WMA) decided in September 1981 -ignoring appeals by the United Nations Special Committee against Apartheid and others - to readmit the Medical Association of South Africa and to admit the medical association of the so-called "independent" state of Transkei. The Special Committee then requested the World Health Organization (WHO) to discontinue relations with WMA. The WHO Executive Board decided on 27 January 1982 - by a vote of 27 to one (United States of America) with one abstention - to discontinue official relations with WMA. The WMA may be readmitted on application, "if it reverses its position regarding readmission of the Medical Association of South Africa, and the admission of the Medical Association of the so-called 'independent' homeland of Transkei". Attached herewith are: (a) Text of message sent to WHO by the Chairman of the SpecialCommittee against Apartheid, H.E. Alhaji Yusuff Maitama-Sule (Nigeria); (b) Statement before the WHO Executive Board by the representative of the Special Committee, H.E. Mr. James Victor Gbeho (Ghana). Format extent 9 page(s) (length/size) http://www.aluka.org http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.nuun1982_04 http://www.aluka.org NOTES AND DOCUMENTS* NOTES AND DOCUMENTS* No. 4/82 February 1982 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISCONTINUES RELATIONS WITH.'WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION -Note: The World Medical Association (WMA) decided in September 1981 ignoring appeals by the United Nations Special Committee against Apartheid and others - to readmit the Medical Association of South Africa and to admit the medical association of the so-called "independent" state of Transkei. The Special Committee then requested the World Health Organization (WHO) to discontinue relations with WMA. The WHO Executive Board decided on 27 January 1982 - by a vote of 27 to one (United States of America) with one abstention - to discontinue official relations with WMA. The WMA may be readmitted on application, "if it reverses its position regarding readmission of the Medical Association of South Africa, and the admission of the Medical Association of the so-called 'independent' homeland of Transkei". Attached herewith are: (a) Text of message sent to WHO by the Chairman of the Special Committee against Apartheid, H.E. Alhaji Yusuff Maitama-Sule (Nigeria); (b) Statement before the WHO Executive Board by the representative of the Special Committee, H.E. Mr. James Victor Gbeho (Ghana). All material in these noies ahd'4o6uni'nfs ma' be freely reprinted. Acknowledgement, together with a copy of te 6ub-4catiowcon-taining the - reprint, would be-appreciated. TELEGRAM DATED 20 JANUARY 1982 FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE AGAINST APARTHEID, H. E. ALHAJI YUSUFF MAITAMA-SULE, ADDRESSED TO THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION SPECIAL COMMITTEE AGAINST APARTHEID HAS NOTED WITH GREAT REGRET AND INDIGNATION THAT WMA DECIDED TO READMIT MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA (MASA) IGNORING NUMEROUS APPEALS BY MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONS, MEDICAL AND HEALTH PERSONNEL IN SOUTH AFRICA, AND ANTI-APARTHEID GROUPS AS WELL AS SPECIAL COMMITTEE. MASA IS AN INSTITUTION WITHIN APARTHEID SYSTEM, CONDEMNED BY INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AS CRIMINAL. IT HAS VIRTUALLY CONDONED BEHAVIOUR OF DOCTORS INVOLVED IN MURDER OF STEVE BIKO, SOUTH AFRICAN PATRIOT, DESPITE DEMANDS FOR ACTION BY LEADING MEDICAL EXPERTS CONCERNED OVER MEDICAL ETHICS. WMA HAS FURTHER DEFIED INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY BY ADMITTING MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF TRANSKEI. SPECIAL COMMITTEE RECALLS THAT UNITED NATIONS HAS UNANIMOUSLY DENOUNCED SO-CALLED "INDEPENDENCE" OF THIS BANTUSTAN AND CALLEL ON ALL GOVERNMENTS AND ORGANIZATIONS TO REFRAIN FROM ANY RECOGNITION OF, OR CO-OPERATION WITH IT. SPECIAL COMMITTEE CONSIDERS THAT COLLABORATION WITH APARTHEID REGIME AND INSTITUTIONS BY NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH UNITED NATIONS AND SPECIALIZED AGENCIES IS TOTALLY INADMISSIBLE. IT DRAWS ATTENTION TO UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 36/172 LADOPTED ON 17 DECEMBER 1981, CALLING UPON ALL NON- GOVEUMNA. ORGANIZATIONS WHICH HAVE NOT YET DONE SO TO DESIST FROM ANY FORM OF COLLABORATION WITH APARTHEID REGIME AND INSTITUTIONS BASED ON RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN SOUTH AFRICA. I TRUST THAT WHO WILL DEMAND THAT WMA CEASE FORTHWITH ITS COLLABORATION WITH APARTHEID AND BANTUSTANS AND DECIDE TO SUSPEND RELATIONS WITH WMA PENDING SUCH ACTION. STATWRZT BY H.E. MR. JAMES VICTOR GBXHO (GHANA) ON BEHALF OF THE SPECIAL COMdrITM AGAINST APARTHEID AT 711P MFFTING OF THE FX CUTIVF B!IARD OF THE UOPLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IN GOENEVA 26 January 1982 I am grateful to the Executive Board of the World Health Organization for making it possible for the United Nations Special Committee against Apartheid, which I have the honour to represent, to express directly to the Board its total disagreement with the World Medical Association (WMA) in readmitting the Medical Association of South Africa (MASA). The Chairman of the Special Committee, H. E. Alhaji Yusuff Maitama-Sule, would have liked to make the presentation today but for other pressing duties in New York. I have been deputized to speak for the Committee and I crave your indulgence in conveying to you the reaction of the Committee to the extraordinary and regrettable decision of WHA to readmit MASA and admit that of the so-called Transkei. The reaction of the Special Committee to the decision taken by WHA in September 1981 is one of regret and indignation because the Committee, together with a number of medical associations in Africa and elsewhere, had appealed in the name of humanity to those who were then instrumental in orchestrating the readmission of MASA not to do so, but had been ignored. It seems, therefore, that some members of WMA are more concerned with the international image of a country whose policies towards the overwhelming majority of its citizenry have been determined a crime against the conscience and dignity of mankind by the United Nations, than the well-being of those suppressed. The United Nations General Assembly, acting on the recommendations of the Special Committee, has repeatedly called for the total isolation of the racist regime in an attempt to bring international pressure to bear on that regime so as to force it to abandon apartheid. The action of WMA is thus in direct opposition to this goal, since the readmission indirectly restores credibility and international acceptability to a regime that is, after all, the only racial oligarchy in the world. The question of apartheid is at once moral and political. It is political because it is an institutionalized form of racism that denies almost all the fundamental rights that you and I have come to accept as basic to our existence in society. But it is also moral because its supposedly legal practice abuses the dignity and human worth of the black majority in South Africa, and is also incompatible with our civilization and ethics. On both counts it is indefensible because its practice flies in the face of the Charter of the United Nations, threatens international peace and security and violates all the norms outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the view of the Special Committee against Apartheid therefore, that all individuals and institutions which claim to represent the interest of humanity, not least the medical associations related to United Nations bodies, have an obligation to work towards the complete elimination of apartheid. There is no room for neutrality in the defence of the Charter principles, if we are to avoid human tragedy of the proportions experienced during the Second World War. May I add, Sir, that the international law against racial discrimination and apartheid embodied in several instruments, includes the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid. MASA's corporate conduct and that of the huge bulk of its members, vis-d-vis the crime of apartheid, is one of collusion in and abetment of some of the specific offences listed in article II of this Convention. As far as the perpetration of apartheid is concerned, the Special Committee holds, first and foremost, the racist r~gime in Pretoria responsible. But action cannot be limited to that rigime only for the reason that not only must those who openly or covertly aid and abet the crime of apartheid share in the blame, but also because we are aware that the racist regime has often used individual countries, institutions and persons to further its obnoxious and racist objectives in order to make apartheid more acceptable to the international community.