Beeline Ridership If Routes 3/32/33/34 Counted Together, Combined Routes Have 1 Weekday Ridership Highest Ridership 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beeline Ridership If Routes 3/32/33/34 Counted Together, Combined Routes Have 1 Weekday Ridership Highest Ridership 2 Summary of Draft Recommended Beeline Changes Route # Potential Near-Term Changes # of New Buses Required Potential Mid-Term # of New Buses Required Description February 2020 Additional Annual Cost Changes (2-5 years) Additional Annual Cost 1 • Run bi-directional on Central only. • No new buses. • Dedicated bus lanes on • Potential cost reductions GTC to • Increase frequency to every10 min. • ($19,178) net weekday operating cost due Central. from increased bus Stocker Square • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p to increased ridership • Provides future dedicated speed: ($2,863) weekday via NB Central Fri & Sat to serve 18-hour downtown. • ($775) net weekend operating cost due to space for BRT. operating cost; ($271) / SB Brand increased ridership Saturday operating cost; • PILOT B: $43,502 Fri evening net ($223) Sunday operating operating cost; $57,395 Sat evening net cost operating cost 2 • Remove all 1 & 2 Beeline service from None – Assets move to Route 1 on Central • Provides future space for None GTC to Brand. (Route 11 stays in place) Av. BRT and/or Streetcar. Stocker Square • Brand becomes a Metro/regional via NB Brand / focused corridor. SB Central 3/31/32 • Discontinue Route 32. • No new buses. • Possible future new Route 9 • 2 buses for 40’ Downtown to • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p • ($201,569) cost reduction and 1 bus saving along Foothill corridor, frequency. JPL via Mon-Thu to serve downtown transfers from Route 32 discontinuation. which would restructure • $1.2M capital expense. Glendale Av and GCC-Verdugo night classes. • PILOT A: $57,249 Mon-Thu evening net Route 3. Would require • $693,352 Mon-Fri net • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p weekday operating cost. financial participation by operating expense Fri & Sat to serve 18-hour downtown. • PILOT B: $34,482 Fri evening net multiple agencies. • Schedule update/peak period trippers. operating cost; $49,389; Sat evening net operating cost. 4 • Standardize frequency to every15 min. • 1 additional bus. • Increase frequency to • 2 additional buses. Downtown weekdays; and 20 min. weekends. • $600,000 capital expense. every10 min. weekdays. • $1.2M capital expense. Glendale to • Extend route west to SFR, for improved • $149,797 net weekday operating expense; • Potential coordination with • $503,690 net weekday Roosevelt transfer from Metro to downtown $44,288 net weekend operating expense. future Metro NextGen route operating expense. Middle School Glendale. • PILOT A: $95,158 Mon-Thu evening net along San Fernando Road. via Chevy • Add pilot evening service until 8:30p weekday operating cost. --- --- Chase Dr Mon-Thu, to service night classes at • PILOT B: $55,783 Fri evening net • Potential extension to GTC • 1 additional bus GCC-Garfield. operating cost; $74,111 Sat evening net on weekdays only • $600,000 capital expense • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p operating cost. • $260,676 net weekday Fri & Sat to serve 18-hour downtown. operating expense 5 • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p • No new buses. None None Pacific Park to Fri & Sat to serve 18-hour downtown. • PILOT B: $19,336 Fri evening net Hoover HS via • Schedule update. operating cost; $25,429 Sat evening net Pacific Av operating cost. 6 • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p • No new buses. • Increase frequency to • 1 additional bus Pacific Park to Fri & Sat to serve 18-hour downtown. • PILOT B: $20,762 Fri evening net every15 min weekdays and • $600,000 capital expense GHS via • Schedule update. operating cost; $25,276 Sat evening net 20 min. Sat if /when Metro • $228,861 net weekday Colorado Bl operating cost. NextGen cancels Line 183. operating expense. • Cancel Route if/when street • $6,125 net Saturday running BRT is operational. operating expense. Route # Potential Near-Term Changes # of New Buses Required Potential Mid-Term # of New Buses Required Description February 2020 Additional Cost Changes (2-5 years) Additional Cost 7 • Move WB route alignment to • No new buses. • Potential changes with TBD Riverside Kenilworth Av at Hoover/Toll/Keppel • ($2,436) net operating cost from bell time future Route 12 Rancho to to reduce bus delays on Pacific Ave. only reduction GCC via • Only serve Hoover/Toll/Keppel at bell • PILOT A: $70,580 Mon-Thu evening net Glenoaks Bl times weekday operating cost. • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p • PILOT B: $39,323 Fri evening net Mon-Thu to serve downtown transfers operating cost; $58,058 Sat evening net and GCC-Verdugo night classes. operating cost. • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p Fri & Sat to serve 18-hour downtown. 8 NEW • New route providing local service in • 3 additional buses. • Potential improvement to No Cost to Glendale GTC to GCC high ridership area. • $1.2M capital expense. Metro NextGen hybrid style via Glendale • One seat ride from GTC to Civic Center • $731,759 weekday operating expense Line 90/91 service to Ave and GCC. • $68,010 weekend operating expense increase bus speed. • Frequency is every 20 minutes. • PILOT A: $108,760 Mon-Thu evening net • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p weekday operating cost. Mon-Thu, to service night classes at • PILOT B: $35,347 Fri evening net GCC-Verdugo. operating cost; $44,677 Sat evening net • Add pilot evening service until 10:15p operating cost. Fri & Sat to serve 18-hour downtown. 11 • Restructure Route 11 alignment to gain None None None GTC Express efficiency via Brand and Central. to Downtown 12 • Add weekday service to Burbank in the • No new buses. • Redo route when/if • ? buses GTC Express midday to serve Grand Central • $385,261 weekday operating expense proposed new West • $0.00 capital expense to BRITC via employment center employees. Glendale Metrolink stations • $0.00 operating expense San Fernando come online. Road • Consider a route structure that serves BRITC, east Burbank and West Glendale with Burbank sharing the cost; pick up any abandoned 183 pax. Micro Transit • Develop a microtransit demonstration Unknown Pilot project for far north Glendale. • Develop microtransit options for LAC and LCF on Foothill corridor with operating parameters and cost per agency. U-Pass • Continue to work with Metro to explore Unknown a cost neutral program for Beeline. V: 7/9/19 FINAL TPC Transportation and Parking Commission July 22, 2019 Why We Need to Reimagine Transit 60 People on a Bus 60 People on a Bike 60 People in A Car Glendale Has Changed Increased residential units in Downtown Fluctuation in student enrollment at schools Increased office space Expanded retail and entertainment venues Non-traditional work hours How We Do This • Community Survey (transit users & non-transit users in Glendale & surrounding communities) • Passenger Survey • Ridecheck • Demographic characteristics • Outreach to stakeholders 199,750 residents (ACS, Glendale Population 2013-17) • 90.1% within ½ mile of transit route Location of low-income Glendale Population and/or minority populations in Beeline service area • Area is shaded if % low income or minority population is > regional % • Important to know for Title VI analysis Who Rides the Beeline? All ages 62 and older 17 and under 18% High school riders 20% account for many 17 and under GCC riders account for many 18-24 18% 62 and older 18 to 24 16% 25 to 61 46% Who Rides the Beeline? Predominantly female, in line with most transit systems Male 41% Female 59% Who Rides the Beeline? 73% have at least 1 vehicle in their Three or more household 13% Zero 44% have 2 or more 27% Two 31% One 29% Who Rides the Beeline? Income is surprising… Under $10,000 30% Over $20,000 48% $10,000-20,000 22% Who Rides the Beeline? Income among local (non-Metrolink Express) riders: 62% with annual incomes of $20K or less Over $20,000 Under $10,000 38% 37% $10,000-20,000 25% Beeline Ridership If Routes 3/32/33/34 counted together, combined routes have 1 Weekday Ridership highest ridership 2 3 all If each route is counted 4 separately, Route 4 5 ridership is highest 6 7 11 12 3 only 32 33 34 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Beeline Ridership Trend Ridership has declined Route Weekday Saturday Sunday since 2013 1 -3% +14% +15% 2 -6% +11% -7% Largest decline on 3 (31 Saturday) -34% -36% -- Routes 3/32 and Route 32 -55% -- -- 7 serving GCC 33 +16% -- -- 34 +24% -- -- 4 -25% -11% -22% 5 -16% -23% -- 6 -17% +4% -- 7 -26% -3% -- 11 -11% -- -- 12 -10% -- -- Total -21% -8% -9% Local Routes -22% -8% -9% Express Routes -10% -- -- Beeline Productivity Measured by # boardings per revenue 1 Weekday Productivity 2 hour that a bus is in 3 all service 4 Route 34, one of the 5 6 LCF shuttles, is highest System 7 Average Routes 3, 4, and 5 are 11 all above average 12 3 only 32 33 34 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Trip Purpose on Beeline 63% of all trips on all Medical days are for work or 4% Visit/Personal school 8% Other 11% Work 38% Shopping 14% School 25% Origins/Destinations City of Glendale Downtown GCC Hoover HS Glendale Transportation Center Origins/Destinations Beeline service area New major locations at LCHS and Union Station - LA Origins/Destinations Region Major flow to/from Santa Clarita Other locations in LA and Orange Counties Emphasizes the importance of the Metrolink/Amtrak connection for Glendale Preferences Riders have a strong More stops (slower travel but preference for more a shorter walk) 7% frequent service New or extended routes to new destinations Riders also favor faster 14% travel time over more bus stops Faster travel time (fewer stops but More frequent a longer walk) service on 17% current routes 62% Weekend Preferences Weekend preferences
Recommended publications
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT to THE: Joint El City Council N Housing Authority El Successor Agency El Oversight Board El
    CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO THE: Joint El City Council N Housing Authority El Successor Agency El Oversight Board El August 27, 2019 AGENDA ITEM Report: Report Regarding Grant Funding for a Transit Fleet Electrification Feasibility Study. 1) Adopt a Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate local transportation funds in the amount of $31,354 from Measure R Local Return funds for FY 201 9-20. 2) Approve a Motion to authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute all grant- related agreements, certifications, and documents necessary for the Program. COUNCIL ACTION Public Hearing El Ordinance El Consent Calendar N Action Item El Report Only El Approved for calendar ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION Signature Submitted by: Yazdan T. Emrani, P.E., Director of Public Works Prepared by: Alex Okashita, Transit Associate Approved by: Yasmin K. Beers, City Manager Reviewed by: ____ Roubik Golanian, Assistant City Manager 2 Kathryn Engel, Transit Manager Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney ____________________ Michele Flynn, Director of Finance ______________________ 48/ RECOMMENDATION ____________________________________________ It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to appropriate $31,354 of Measure R Local Return funds as grant match for the Transit Fleet Electrification Feasibility Study (“Program”); and, approve a motion to authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute all grant-related agreements, certifications, and documents necessary for the Program. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant is a competitive statewide grant that received 198 applications for FY 2019-20 funding, and resulted in the award of only 84 projects for a total of $27.8 million. Grant categories include Sustainable Communities, Strategic Partnerships, and Adaptation Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors J U L Y 2 4 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 24, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Roxana Martinez Supervisor, 5th District Councilmember 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor City of Palmdale Metro Board Metro Appointee Hilda Solis Joseph J. Gonzales Supervisor, 1st District Councilmember County of Los Angeles City of South El Monte Metro Board Metro Appointee Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board
    [Show full text]
  • SERVICE CHANGES As of July 1, 2019 Effective July 1 There Have Been No Service Changes
    SERVICE CHANGES as of July 1, 2019 Effective July 1 There have been no service changes. INFORMATION (661) 294-1BUS (1287) TDD (661) 295-6382 or (800) 826-7280 All schedules are available online at SantaClaritaTransit.com. @SCTBus All City of Santa Clarita Transit buses and vans are wheelchair accessible. City of Santa Clarita Transit Maintenance Facility 28250 Constellation Road Santa Clarita, CA 91355-5000 Printed on recycled paper. On the cover: Los Angeles Union Station. Cover photograph courtesy of Metro © 2015 LACMTA SANTA CLARITA VALLEY 757 Noho Express 794 /791 / 757 796 799 NORTH 792 / HOLLYWOOD 796 791 797 NOHO STATION CHATSWORTH METRO ORANGE LINE VAN NUYS CANOGA PARK RESEDA WARNER CENTER LADOT 549 UNIVERSAL CITY WOODLAND HILLS ENCINO HOLLY WOOD 797 METRO PURPLE LINE 792 METRO RED LINE WESTWOOD/UCLA WILSHIRE/ CENTURY CITY WESTERN EXPO LINE 7TH/ CULVER CITY EXPOSITION METRO PARK STATION METRO BLUE LINE BLUE METRO LAX METRO GREEN LINE PACIFIC OCEAN EL SEGUNDO REDONDO BEACH LONG BEACH COMMUTER TRANSIT SYSTEM MAP SYSTEM TRANSIT COMMUTER City of Santa Clarita Transit / COMMUTER SCHEDULE / July 2019 Transit Commuter Express Bus Autobús expreso de tránsito Commuter Commuter Transit System Map / Mapa del sistema de tránsito Commuter ...........................1 Welcome Aboard and General Information / Bienvenido a bordo y información general ..... 2-5 Route / Ruta 757 NoHo Express 6-7 SERVING / SIRVIENDO: North Hollywood Station, Red Line, Orange Line CONNECTING TO / CONEXIÓNA: METRO Bus/Rail, LADOT, BurbankBus BOB HOPE Route / Rutas 796
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019
    Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019 Prepared by: In association with: IBI Group Terry A Hayes Associates HDR Translink RSE Epic Land Solutions RSG Costin Public Outreach Group LOS ANGELES GLENDALE BURBANK CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR Metro Regional Rail One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA October 21, 2019 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: IBI Group HDR RSE RSG Terry A. Hayes Associates Translink Epic Land Solutions Costin Public Outreach Group Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Page ii Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 1 Project Purpose...................................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 Feasibility Study Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 Study Findings ....................................................................................................................... 5 Study Resolution ...................................................................................................................10 1. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
    Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CNG As a Transit Bus Fuel
    TheThe TransitTransit BusBus NicheNiche MarketMarket ForFor AlternativeAlternative Fuels:Fuels: ModuleModule 3:3: OverviewOverview ofof CompressedCompressed NaturalNatural GasGas asas aa TransitTransit BusBus FuelFuel CleanClean CitiesCities CoordinatorCoordinator ToolkitToolkit PreparedPrepared byby TIAXTIAX LLC,LLC, IrvineIrvine OfficeOffice DecemberDecember 20032003 TIAX LLC One Park Plaza, 6th Floor Irvine, California 92614 949-833-7131 / [email protected] Options for Natural Gas Fueling in Transit • Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) – Pipeline natural gas: methane with other hydrocarbons – Pressurized to 3,600 psi – Fueling accomplished by pressure transfer to vehicle – About 12% of transit buses in the U.S. now use conventional CNG – Largest users include LACMTA, MARTA, NY DOT, Pierce Transit, Washington D.C. (WMATA), Cleveland, Sacramento • Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) – Nearly pure methane (~98%) liquefied at very low temperatures – Liquid transfer to vehicle – Largest users are Phoenix, Orange County (CA), Dallas, and Tempe – Newer users include Santa Monica, Long Beach • LNG to CNG (“LCNG”) – Vaporized LNG (also nearly pure methane) – Liquid to gas conversion, then pressure transfer to vehicle – Sun Metro, OmniTrans, others use this approach Document Code 1 Methane Content in Pipeline Natural Gas Varies Regionally Methane Molecule Typical Composition of Pipeline Natural Gas What are the Implications of the Resulting CNG Fuel Quality Variations? • CNG with lower methane content (higher levels of ethane, propane, or butane) has resulted in some adverse affects on heavy-duty NG engine performance (e.g., misfire, stumble and underrated operation, engine knock, overheating) • However, today’s lean-burn closed-loop NG engines for transit (e.g., C Gas Plus and DDC S50G) are better able to tolerate and compensate for variations • Compromises in emissions performance have been found to be modest Document Code 2 Numerous OEMs Offer Natural Gas Transit Buses and Paratransit Vehicles Natural Gas Bus Manufacturer Models Available Champion Bus, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 777 North Front Street Project
    777 North Front Street Project Noise Study prepared for City of Burbank 150 North Third Street Burbank, California 91502 prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 301 Los Angeles, California 90012 March 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Project Summary ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 Background and Setting .................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration ................................................................................ 5 2.2 Sensitive Receptors ............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Existing Project Area Noise Levels ...................................................................................... 6 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................................................................... 9 3 Impact Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Methodology and Significance Thresholds ....................................................................... 15 3.2 Project Impacts and Recommended Measures ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Minute Map 072909
    DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES To/from Downtown Los Angeles CHINATOWN Metro Local, Limited and Rapid CHINATOWN MAIN ST Line(s) Serving Between And NORTH SPRING METROST GOLD LINE 2,302 Sunset Bl Downtown LA Fairfax Av 4,704 Santa Monica Bl Downtown LA West LA COLLEGE ST 14,714 Beverly Bl Downtown LA San Vicente Bl VIGNES ST 16,316 33rd St Downtown LA La Cienega Bl 18 West 6th St-Whittier Bl Wilshire/Western Montebello/Commerce HILL ST 110 ST YALE NORTH BROADWAY Metrolink Station 20,720,920 Wilshire Bl Downtown LA Santa Monica 2 4 ORD ST 302 704 81 90 45 26,51,52,352 West 7th St-Avalon Bl 7th/Hoover Avalon Station SUNSET BL 91 94 83 84 28,728 Olympic Bl Downtown LA Century City 794 85 68 70 71 78 79 378 30,31 East 1st St Downtown LA Rowan Av 30,31,730 Pico Bl Downtown LA Pico/Rimpau 2 4 55 770 83 704 704 728 60 355 302 2 302 704 33,333 Venice Bl Downtown LA Venice 728 745 740 745 PATSAOURAS 704 CESAR CHAVEZ AV 770 40 42 35,335 West Washington Bl Downtown LA Washington/Fairfax METRO RED LINE TRANSIT 37 West Adams Bl Downtown LA La Brea Av PLAZA 110 METRO PURPLE LINE 33 AY 40,740 M L King Bl-Crenshaw Bl-Hawthorne Bl Downtown LA South Bay Galleria 68 W IT 45,745 Broadway Downtown LA Harbor Fwy Station 333 UNION STATION S MAIN ST GRAND AV N 45,83,84 North Broadway Downtown LA LA River Bridge SPRING ST HOPE ST 2 4 55 33 68 TRA 53,753 Central Av Downtown LA Imperial Hwy 101 60 355 302 480-494EL MONTE 70 71 Federal LA Cathedral 60,760 Long Beach Bl Downtown LA Artesia Station FIGUEROA ST 76 78 Building TEMPLE ST 484 490 FT481 está disponible en en disponible está 66 366 metro.net.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink AVT Palmdale
    AVT Lancaster Connections to/from Metrolink AVT Palmdale Vincent Grade/ Free Connections Acton REGIONAL SYSTEM MA P Anaheim Resort Transit Vista Canyon ART WITH FREE CO NNECTIONS AVT AVTA STC Via Princessa BPS Baldwin Park Shuttle BMT Beaumont Transit STC Santa Clarita BAS Burbank Airport Shuttle LOS ANGELES BRB Burbank Bus AVT LAC STC Newhall CO. CMB Commerce Municipal Bus VENTURA CC Corona Cruiser LMB CO. Sylmar/ LMB EMS El Monte Commuter Shuttle LDT LMB San Fernando LMB GLB FHT Foothill Transit t – BAS BRB TOR Sun Valley BAS STC GLB Glendale Beeline SAN BERNARDINO OMT LDT GCT Gold Coast Transit STC LMR CO. BMT MPS APU/Citrus College ISH iShuttle SIM Burbank Airpor LMB North (AV Line) LMB OMT Ventura – East VCT VCT LMB LMB FHT GCT OMT LAC LA County DPW Shuttle LMB LAC VCT VCT SIM LDT LDT LDT BUR RTA OxnardGCT Camarillo Moorpark Simi Valley Chatsworth Northridge CMB LMB FHT FHT LMB Van Nuys GLB FHT LA Metro Bus Burbank – Downtown AVT FHT BPS OMT FHT FHT LMR LA Metro Rail EMS OMT FHT OMT OMT Chatsworth North Hollywood Glendale LDT LADOT MBL Montebello Bus Lines LMB Cal State L.A.El Monte Baldwin ParkCovina Pomona – ClaremontNorth Montclair Upland Rancho CucamongaFontana Rialto San BernardinoSan Depot Bernardino – Downtown BRB L.A. Union Station MPS Monterey Park Spirit Bus Burbank Airport - San BernardinoRedlands – TippecanoeRedlands – Esri Redlands – Downtown – University South (VC Line) Atlantic ONT BAS NCS NCTD - Sprinter/Breeze 7th/Metro NWT Wilshire/Western MBL Norwalk Transit LMB Montebello/ OMT OCT OCTA CommerceCMB Santa Monica
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Special Olympics World Summer Games Los Angeles Bid Book
    FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION: SPECIAL OLYMPICS WORLD SUMMER GAMES LOS ANGELES 2015 Shakespeare gave us the classic epigram, "All the World's a Stage." A stage on which to experience all the moments of a life well lived - To respect and care for others - To endure the slings and arrows of fortune and adversity - To honor righteous accomplishments - To overcome challenges - To celebrate well-earned victories. For the athletes, families and all those affected by intellectual disabilities, nothing less than a legitimate "World Stage" is a fitting place to showcase the drive, spirit and emotional commitment exemplified by Special Olympics. The world can be unified through the collective experience of witnessing their effort, awed by their strength and character, and fundamentally changed by embracing their endeavor. A "World Stage:" A platform on the pinnacle of global attention and focus; a proscenium through which all people and nations share and celebrate the true spirit of acceptance and inclusion. As Special Olympics International considers a city to host its 2015 World Games, we offer for your consideration a community uniquely suited to deliver an unparalleled and world-class experience to the anticipated thousands of visiting Special Olympics athletes, their families and supporters. A thriving, diverse and influential world city that is the center of the Global Media Industry, and unmatched in its suitability to showcase the Special Olympics story to the World: LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA can provide a true "World Stage," upon which the 2015 World Games can become a seminal event in the history of the Special Olympics Movement. In a city full of movie stars and all-stars, our athletes will be the stars of this show! Their experience will be unforgettable, both for them and those moved by their efforts.
    [Show full text]