DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Pass Program (EZ Transit Pass) ______Summary of Policy 17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Pass Program (EZ Transit Pass) ______Summary of Policy 17 Regional Pass Program (EZ Transit Pass) ______________________________________________________________________________ Summary of Policy 17. Santa Clarita Transit 18. Santa Fe Springs MetroExpress The purpose of the Regional EZ Transit 19. Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Pass program is to provide a low 20. South Pasadena Gold Link technology, low-cost, immediately 21. Torrance Transit implementable program, so that transit patrons in Los Angeles County are able to Historical Perspective benefit from seamless transfers in advance of the implementation of the In January 1999, Board adopted a motion Universal Fare System (UFS). directing staff to begin discussions with municipal operators with the objective of The price of the Monthly Regional Pass developing a consensus around a package was set at $58, and Elderly and Disabled of policy changes that would improve $29. The price for Zone premium was set regional services for bus riders, operators, at $15 per zone increment, and Elderly and labor. One of the elements to be and Disabled Zone premium at $7.50. included in that package was to establish All operators sell the pass from their an integrated regional pass and fare current outlets and transit stores, and they system to better serve our customer. market the pass through existing An Operator Taskforce was established programs or through joint marketing consisting of General Managers of the efforts. Each operator is reimbursed at the local transit systems and agency rate of its current average fare per Operations to develop a regional pass boarding multiplied by the operator’s program. The taskforce developed an Regional Pass boardings. implementation plan, a work program, The EZ Transit Pass Program currently major milestones, and implementation consists of 17 transit operators, including schedule and timeline. agency bus and rail, the municipal The program approach included two operators and two locally funded transit phases. The first phase included systems. municipal operators and operators willing Current members include: to participate in this Regional Pass Program. The second phase would 1. Antelope Valley include other operators, local systems, 2. Burbank Local Transit Metrolink, and other counties. 3. City of Commerce 4. Culver City Municipal Bus Line The program principals and framework 5. Foothill Transit included: 6. Gardena Municipal Bus Line Keeping Operators Whole: 7. Glendale Beeline Commitment to keep all operators and 8. LADOT Metro Operations whole. The 9. Long Beach Transit Regional Pass would have no revenue 10. Metro Bus & Rail loss to the participating operators. 11. Montebello Bus Lines 12. Monterey Park Spirit Bus Revenue Sharing: Goal to achieve a 13. Metrolink balance between a methodology, which 14. Municipal Area Express (MAX) would be simple/easy to administer, 15. Norwalk Transit yet fair to all participants. 16. Pasadena ARTS Shuttle Regional Pass Program (EZ Transit Pass) ______________________________________________________________________________ Price of Regional Pass: Keep the price Pass fare media on board participating EZ affordable yet allows some reasonable Transit Pass operators. Participating bus payback to the operators. and rail operators, including the agency, will be reimbursed for the Metrolink fare Use of Regional Funds: Keep the boardings using funding derived from a Regional pass affordable, consider surcharge that Metrolink collects with regional funds to subsidize the each ticket or pass purchase. program participants (if needed) Before the Board adopted the Regional Last Board Action Pass Program in April 2002, transit riders, June 7, 2004 – FY2004 Budget -Regional who used more than one system or Pass Program (Funds were increased to transferred between systems, had to be $3M to reflect the full scope of the aware of multiple fares. This became very program) confusing for transit riders and discouraged new riders from seeking Board adopted: transit, as a means of completing local A. the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Budget; travel needs. B. the Reimbursement Resolution to Now with the Regional Pass Program, it authorize the expenditure of funds for allows transit riders to transfer from one capital construction and acquisition system to another without making transfer activities prior to issuance of debt for payments. The Program is a step toward specific activities; the UFS, which will create seamless travel for transit riders through a regional fare C. the life-of-project increases and collection system that includes all modes funding plan changes for capital and operators. projects; and In January 2003, the Board adopted the D. the budgeted number of positions and 2003-2007 Regional Transit Plan. The estimated salary/benefit costs for each Regional Transit Plan is used to guide the agency classification by department. efforts to improve the regional bus system Attachment and to sustain on-going service coordination efforts among the municipal Regional Pass Program operators and agency Operations. The See Related Plan includes promoting seamless fare programs, such as the Universal Fare 2003-2007 Regional Transit Plan System, Regional (EZ) Pass Program, and Smart Card Technology for Transit Access Interagency Transfers. Pass In September 2003, the Board approved an agreement with Metrolink to integrate them into the Regional Pass Program. The purpose of integrating Metrolink into the EZ Transit Pass Program is to promote seamless transfers between Metrolink and transit services. Under the proposed integration, Metrolink fare media will be accepted as valid EZ Transit PROGRAM APPROACH . First Phase: include municipal operatorsand operatorswilling to participatein the Regional PassProgram (RPP) - (all fixed route Municipal Operators except Antelope Valley Transit Authority areparticipating, i.e., 12 transit operatorsincluding MTA Operations) . SecondPhase: Include other operators;local systems,Metrolink and other countiessuch as OrangeCounty B. Pro2ram Principles and Framework . Ke~ing O~rators Whole: Commitmentto keepall operatorsand MT A Operationswhole. In other words, RegionalPass to result in no revenueloss to MT A Operationsor the participatingoperators . RevenueSharing Methodology: Goal to achievea balancebetween a methodologythat would be simple/easyto administer,yet fair to all participants. Price of RegionalPass: Keepingthe price affordableyet sufficient to allow somereasonable paybackto the operators . Use of RegionalFunds: To keepthe RegionalPass affordable, consider regional funds to subsidizethe programparticipants c. Relationship to UFS . Selectrevenue sharing methodology and regionalpass price suchthat it canbe directly transferredto or easilymodified to continuewhen the upcomingUFS is implemented. Everyoneparticipating has the option to sell the pass . Operatorsand MT A sell the passthrough their currentsales outlets . Operatorsmarket the passthrough their own marketingprograms and participatein joint marketingefforts PROGRAM ELEMENTS A. Price of the Regional Pass . Transit riders likely to buy a regionalpass are thesewho transferfrom one systemto anotherto completetheir trips . Currentcost of a trip with transferto anothersystem . $47 - $57 for cashpaying customers (Table I attached) . $52 - $62 for MT A passholders (Table 2 attached) Recommendationto consider$58 as the price of the RegionalPass . A $29 RegionalPass for seniors/disabledor half of the price of the RegionalPass . An Expressmonthly regionalpass with optionsof five or more zones . (Eachzone at a $15 price increment) . An expressmonthly seniorand disabledpass with optionsof five or more zones . (Eachzone at $7.50price increment) B. Methodologywhere revenues are distributedbased on eachoperator's system average fare/boardingmultiplied by the operatorsregional pass hoardings . This methodologykeeps every operator whole, as the operatorsare reimbursed the same averagerevenue/boarding as they arecurrently collecting . Sincethe revenuecollected from the saleof the regionalpasses may be lessthan the revenueto be returnedto the operators,some regional subsidy funds are needed(table 3 attached) c. Cost of the Proeram: FY2003 FundingSource: PropositionA & C/fDA administrativefunds D. Administrative Details . MTA staff will work with the participatingtransit operatorsto executean MOU and developadministrative guidelines to include: . Revenueand datareporting mechanism . Revenuereconciliation and reimbursementprocedures, auditing requirements and other requirementsnecessary to proceedwith the program.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT to THE: Joint El City Council N Housing Authority El Successor Agency El Oversight Board El
    CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO THE: Joint El City Council N Housing Authority El Successor Agency El Oversight Board El August 27, 2019 AGENDA ITEM Report: Report Regarding Grant Funding for a Transit Fleet Electrification Feasibility Study. 1) Adopt a Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate local transportation funds in the amount of $31,354 from Measure R Local Return funds for FY 201 9-20. 2) Approve a Motion to authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute all grant- related agreements, certifications, and documents necessary for the Program. COUNCIL ACTION Public Hearing El Ordinance El Consent Calendar N Action Item El Report Only El Approved for calendar ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION Signature Submitted by: Yazdan T. Emrani, P.E., Director of Public Works Prepared by: Alex Okashita, Transit Associate Approved by: Yasmin K. Beers, City Manager Reviewed by: ____ Roubik Golanian, Assistant City Manager 2 Kathryn Engel, Transit Manager Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney ____________________ Michele Flynn, Director of Finance ______________________ 48/ RECOMMENDATION ____________________________________________ It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to appropriate $31,354 of Measure R Local Return funds as grant match for the Transit Fleet Electrification Feasibility Study (“Program”); and, approve a motion to authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute all grant-related agreements, certifications, and documents necessary for the Program. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant is a competitive statewide grant that received 198 applications for FY 2019-20 funding, and resulted in the award of only 84 projects for a total of $27.8 million. Grant categories include Sustainable Communities, Strategic Partnerships, and Adaptation Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors J U L Y 2 4 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 24, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Roxana Martinez Supervisor, 5th District Councilmember 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor City of Palmdale Metro Board Metro Appointee Hilda Solis Joseph J. Gonzales Supervisor, 1st District Councilmember County of Los Angeles City of South El Monte Metro Board Metro Appointee Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board
    [Show full text]
  • SERVICE CHANGES As of July 1, 2019 Effective July 1 There Have Been No Service Changes
    SERVICE CHANGES as of July 1, 2019 Effective July 1 There have been no service changes. INFORMATION (661) 294-1BUS (1287) TDD (661) 295-6382 or (800) 826-7280 All schedules are available online at SantaClaritaTransit.com. @SCTBus All City of Santa Clarita Transit buses and vans are wheelchair accessible. City of Santa Clarita Transit Maintenance Facility 28250 Constellation Road Santa Clarita, CA 91355-5000 Printed on recycled paper. On the cover: Los Angeles Union Station. Cover photograph courtesy of Metro © 2015 LACMTA SANTA CLARITA VALLEY 757 Noho Express 794 /791 / 757 796 799 NORTH 792 / HOLLYWOOD 796 791 797 NOHO STATION CHATSWORTH METRO ORANGE LINE VAN NUYS CANOGA PARK RESEDA WARNER CENTER LADOT 549 UNIVERSAL CITY WOODLAND HILLS ENCINO HOLLY WOOD 797 METRO PURPLE LINE 792 METRO RED LINE WESTWOOD/UCLA WILSHIRE/ CENTURY CITY WESTERN EXPO LINE 7TH/ CULVER CITY EXPOSITION METRO PARK STATION METRO BLUE LINE BLUE METRO LAX METRO GREEN LINE PACIFIC OCEAN EL SEGUNDO REDONDO BEACH LONG BEACH COMMUTER TRANSIT SYSTEM MAP SYSTEM TRANSIT COMMUTER City of Santa Clarita Transit / COMMUTER SCHEDULE / July 2019 Transit Commuter Express Bus Autobús expreso de tránsito Commuter Commuter Transit System Map / Mapa del sistema de tránsito Commuter ...........................1 Welcome Aboard and General Information / Bienvenido a bordo y información general ..... 2-5 Route / Ruta 757 NoHo Express 6-7 SERVING / SIRVIENDO: North Hollywood Station, Red Line, Orange Line CONNECTING TO / CONEXIÓNA: METRO Bus/Rail, LADOT, BurbankBus BOB HOPE Route / Rutas 796
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019
    Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019 Prepared by: In association with: IBI Group Terry A Hayes Associates HDR Translink RSE Epic Land Solutions RSG Costin Public Outreach Group LOS ANGELES GLENDALE BURBANK CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR Metro Regional Rail One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA October 21, 2019 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: IBI Group HDR RSE RSG Terry A. Hayes Associates Translink Epic Land Solutions Costin Public Outreach Group Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Page ii Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 1 Project Purpose...................................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 Feasibility Study Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 Study Findings ....................................................................................................................... 5 Study Resolution ...................................................................................................................10 1. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation/LAX Metro Rail Station BBB3, BCT109, C6, R3, R6 69 U LAX Employee V
    metro.net LAX Airport Area Connections Destinations Lines Stops Scale One Unit:1/4 Mile S E V Y V P W A A 10 Aviation/LAX Metro Rail Station BBB3, BCT109, C6, R3, R6 69 U LAX Employee V E A L W MORLEY ST A T S C University V Parking Lot D 1 1 Metro Local Stop A S Century Bl 117 5 E T N D A of West A C E A Crenshaw District 42, 42A, 40 (Late Night) # W H Post L S ESTWAY A L MetroLos LocalAngeles D I E E 1 1 E O;ce and Rapid Stop S 5 10 I Culver City C6, R6 LI B NC V S OL L T Culver City Transit Center C6, R6 5 10 N U E P R VITAE ST 1 Metro Rapid Stop E OR PKWY ARB Downtown Los Angeles 42, 42A, CE438, 40 (Late Night) D B S LAX City Bus Center L V Super 8 Motel Metro Rapid Line A El Segundo – Downtown BCT109 B26 LAX Parking V INSET 1 LAX Parking Lot C A at LAX Lot C El Segundo Offi ce Parks 232, 625, T8 AC389 Metro Rail93RD Station ST 93RD ST A BCT Bus service C T8 1 17 109 111 & Entrance FREE Florence Av 111 7 V N 94TH ST to Terminals A A Lot C Shuttle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 L Hermosa Beach BCT109 26 Information Information To LAX L Metro Green Line 9 4 E TH ST V Terminals Hollywood Park 117 A5 B A 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 Y 1 Parking 42 BBB3 BBB3 C6 232 N Imperial Hwy 120 4 D E 40 (Owl) R3 R3 R6 N N L 95TH ST R O (NB) (SB) T 9 E 5 S Inglewood 111, 117 57 O TH ST R Civic Building J B E V F V L A 96TH ST L A E LA County Superior Court 625, MAX2, MAX3, MAX3X 9 B Hotel Building LAX City Bus Center (LAX Lot C) BBB3, BCT109, C6, R3, R6 2 5 E 9 DG ST 6 DR IDSON I T DAV BR Shuttle C 96TH H ST LAX City Bus Center Other Building La Tijera Bl 42, 42A Terminal SEE
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
    Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CNG As a Transit Bus Fuel
    TheThe TransitTransit BusBus NicheNiche MarketMarket ForFor AlternativeAlternative Fuels:Fuels: ModuleModule 3:3: OverviewOverview ofof CompressedCompressed NaturalNatural GasGas asas aa TransitTransit BusBus FuelFuel CleanClean CitiesCities CoordinatorCoordinator ToolkitToolkit PreparedPrepared byby TIAXTIAX LLC,LLC, IrvineIrvine OfficeOffice DecemberDecember 20032003 TIAX LLC One Park Plaza, 6th Floor Irvine, California 92614 949-833-7131 / [email protected] Options for Natural Gas Fueling in Transit • Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) – Pipeline natural gas: methane with other hydrocarbons – Pressurized to 3,600 psi – Fueling accomplished by pressure transfer to vehicle – About 12% of transit buses in the U.S. now use conventional CNG – Largest users include LACMTA, MARTA, NY DOT, Pierce Transit, Washington D.C. (WMATA), Cleveland, Sacramento • Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) – Nearly pure methane (~98%) liquefied at very low temperatures – Liquid transfer to vehicle – Largest users are Phoenix, Orange County (CA), Dallas, and Tempe – Newer users include Santa Monica, Long Beach • LNG to CNG (“LCNG”) – Vaporized LNG (also nearly pure methane) – Liquid to gas conversion, then pressure transfer to vehicle – Sun Metro, OmniTrans, others use this approach Document Code 1 Methane Content in Pipeline Natural Gas Varies Regionally Methane Molecule Typical Composition of Pipeline Natural Gas What are the Implications of the Resulting CNG Fuel Quality Variations? • CNG with lower methane content (higher levels of ethane, propane, or butane) has resulted in some adverse affects on heavy-duty NG engine performance (e.g., misfire, stumble and underrated operation, engine knock, overheating) • However, today’s lean-burn closed-loop NG engines for transit (e.g., C Gas Plus and DDC S50G) are better able to tolerate and compensate for variations • Compromises in emissions performance have been found to be modest Document Code 2 Numerous OEMs Offer Natural Gas Transit Buses and Paratransit Vehicles Natural Gas Bus Manufacturer Models Available Champion Bus, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Minute Map 072909
    DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES To/from Downtown Los Angeles CHINATOWN Metro Local, Limited and Rapid CHINATOWN MAIN ST Line(s) Serving Between And NORTH SPRING METROST GOLD LINE 2,302 Sunset Bl Downtown LA Fairfax Av 4,704 Santa Monica Bl Downtown LA West LA COLLEGE ST 14,714 Beverly Bl Downtown LA San Vicente Bl VIGNES ST 16,316 33rd St Downtown LA La Cienega Bl 18 West 6th St-Whittier Bl Wilshire/Western Montebello/Commerce HILL ST 110 ST YALE NORTH BROADWAY Metrolink Station 20,720,920 Wilshire Bl Downtown LA Santa Monica 2 4 ORD ST 302 704 81 90 45 26,51,52,352 West 7th St-Avalon Bl 7th/Hoover Avalon Station SUNSET BL 91 94 83 84 28,728 Olympic Bl Downtown LA Century City 794 85 68 70 71 78 79 378 30,31 East 1st St Downtown LA Rowan Av 30,31,730 Pico Bl Downtown LA Pico/Rimpau 2 4 55 770 83 704 704 728 60 355 302 2 302 704 33,333 Venice Bl Downtown LA Venice 728 745 740 745 PATSAOURAS 704 CESAR CHAVEZ AV 770 40 42 35,335 West Washington Bl Downtown LA Washington/Fairfax METRO RED LINE TRANSIT 37 West Adams Bl Downtown LA La Brea Av PLAZA 110 METRO PURPLE LINE 33 AY 40,740 M L King Bl-Crenshaw Bl-Hawthorne Bl Downtown LA South Bay Galleria 68 W IT 45,745 Broadway Downtown LA Harbor Fwy Station 333 UNION STATION S MAIN ST GRAND AV N 45,83,84 North Broadway Downtown LA LA River Bridge SPRING ST HOPE ST 2 4 55 33 68 TRA 53,753 Central Av Downtown LA Imperial Hwy 101 60 355 302 480-494EL MONTE 70 71 Federal LA Cathedral 60,760 Long Beach Bl Downtown LA Artesia Station FIGUEROA ST 76 78 Building TEMPLE ST 484 490 FT481 está disponible en en disponible está 66 366 metro.net.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink AVT Palmdale
    AVT Lancaster Connections to/from Metrolink AVT Palmdale Vincent Grade/ Free Connections Acton REGIONAL SYSTEM MA P Anaheim Resort Transit Vista Canyon ART WITH FREE CO NNECTIONS AVT AVTA STC Via Princessa BPS Baldwin Park Shuttle BMT Beaumont Transit STC Santa Clarita BAS Burbank Airport Shuttle LOS ANGELES BRB Burbank Bus AVT LAC STC Newhall CO. CMB Commerce Municipal Bus VENTURA CC Corona Cruiser LMB CO. Sylmar/ LMB EMS El Monte Commuter Shuttle LDT LMB San Fernando LMB GLB FHT Foothill Transit t – BAS BRB TOR Sun Valley BAS STC GLB Glendale Beeline SAN BERNARDINO OMT LDT GCT Gold Coast Transit STC LMR CO. BMT MPS APU/Citrus College ISH iShuttle SIM Burbank Airpor LMB North (AV Line) LMB OMT Ventura – East VCT VCT LMB LMB FHT GCT OMT LAC LA County DPW Shuttle LMB LAC VCT VCT SIM LDT LDT LDT BUR RTA OxnardGCT Camarillo Moorpark Simi Valley Chatsworth Northridge CMB LMB FHT FHT LMB Van Nuys GLB FHT LA Metro Bus Burbank – Downtown AVT FHT BPS OMT FHT FHT LMR LA Metro Rail EMS OMT FHT OMT OMT Chatsworth North Hollywood Glendale LDT LADOT MBL Montebello Bus Lines LMB Cal State L.A.El Monte Baldwin ParkCovina Pomona – ClaremontNorth Montclair Upland Rancho CucamongaFontana Rialto San BernardinoSan Depot Bernardino – Downtown BRB L.A. Union Station MPS Monterey Park Spirit Bus Burbank Airport - San BernardinoRedlands – TippecanoeRedlands – Esri Redlands – Downtown – University South (VC Line) Atlantic ONT BAS NCS NCTD - Sprinter/Breeze 7th/Metro NWT Wilshire/Western MBL Norwalk Transit LMB Montebello/ OMT OCT OCTA CommerceCMB Santa Monica
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRANSIT ADVOCATE Quarterly Basis
    How to join SO.CA.TA: Yearly dues are $30.00 cates. In all other cases, permission must be ($12.00 low income). Dues are prorated on a secured from the copyright holder. THE TRANSIT ADVOCATE quarterly basis. Disclaimer: The Southern California Transit Submission of materials: ALL materials for the Advocates is not affiliated with any governmental Newsletter of the Southern California Transit Advocates TRANSIT ADVOCATE newsletter go to Andrew agency or transportation provider. Names and March 2012 Vol. 20, No. 03 Novak at P.O. Box 2383, Downey California 90242 logos of agencies appear for information and or to [email protected]. Please enclose a self reference purposes only. addressed stamped envelope for returns. SO.CA.TA officers, 2012 Newsletter deadlines are the Fridays a week President: Nate Zablen before SO.CA.TA meetings, at 6:00 PM Pacific Vice President: Kent Landfield time, unless otherwise announced. Recording Secretary: Edmund Buckley Executive Secretary: Dana Gabbard Opinions: Unless clearly marked as "Editorial" or Treasurer: Dave Snowden "Position Paper", all written material within, Directors at Large: Ken Ruben including all inserted flyers and postcards, are the J.K. Drummond expressed opinions of the authors and not Joe Dunn necessarily that of the Southern California Transit ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Advocates. Newsletter Editor: Andrew Novak Newsletter Prod. Mgr: Dana Gabbard Copyright: © 2012 Southern California Transit Webmaster: Charles Hobbs Advocates. Permission is freely granted to repro- th th duce/reprint ORIGINAL articles from the Transit NEXT SO.CA.TA MEETINGS : Mar 10 and April 14 at Angelus Plaza, 4th Floor, 255 S. Hill, Los Angeles Advocate, provided credit is given to both the au- thor and the Southern California Transit Advo- March 2012 — Issue 232 Southern California Transit Advocates 3010 Wilshire #362 Los Angeles, CA 90010 45¢ First 213-388-2364 Class http://www.socata.net Postage [email protected] FIRST CLASS MAIL Inside This Issue: Metro NABI 8092 at CMF on February 25, 2012.
    [Show full text]