PRELIMINARY PARALLEL SESSION SCHEDULE SHOT ANNUAL MEETING 2021, NEW ORLEANS* (JOINT SHOT-HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED) Version 7 August 2021
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kentucky's “Atomic Graveyard”: Maxey Flats and Environmental Inequity In
Kentucky’s “Atomic Graveyard”: Maxey Flats and Environmental Inequity in Rural America By Caroline Peyton In 1962, with powers vested by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commis- sion (AEC), Kentucky licensed a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility, the Maxey Flats Disposal Site.1 Located in northeastern Ken- tucky’s rural Fleming County, the site’s shallow trenches welcomed nuclear garbage, ranging from medical scrubs to highly radioactive “special nuclear material” from 1963 to 1977. 2 During the mid-1970s, a state investigation detected the presence of plutonium, a transuranic radioactive chemical element, in offsite water sources. Soon thereaf- ter, an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) study revealed what many feared: plutonium had moved beyond the site’s trenches and would conceivably continue to do so. The findings challenged the 1 Local residents refer to the area as “Maxey Flat.” I employ the name Maxey Flats, per government documents. For “atomic graveyard,” see Jim Morrissey, “Kentucky’s Atomic Burial Ground,” Louisville Courier-Journal, December 13, 1964. The author wishes to acknowledge the Kentucky Historical Society’s generous financial support, and she is grateful for the editorial guidance and perceptive feedback provided by David Turpie, Richard Judd, and David Stradling. She would also like to thank the Register’s staff and the three anonymous reviewers for their comments and insight. 2 Environmental Protection Agency, “Summary of Remedial Alternative Selection, Record of Decision, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Maxey Flats Disposal Site, 14–15,” October 1991, 11–12 (hereinafter EPA, Maxey Flats ROD); “Division of Waste Management: Maxey Flats Disposal Site,” Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection website, http://waste.ky.gov/SFB/Pages/MaxeyFlatsProject.aspx (accessed November 8, 2016). -
An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence ................................................................................................. -
WGU Commencement.Qxp WGU Commencement 1/23/17 10:24 AM Page 1
2017 WGU Commencement.qxp_WGU Commencement 1/23/17 10:24 AM Page 1 Commencement d S ATURDAY , F EBRUARY 11, 2017 L AKE B UENA V ISTA , F LORIDA 2017 WGU Commencement.qxp_WGU Commencement 1/23/17 10:24 AM Page 2 Member Governors Alaska Nevada e Honorable e Honorable Bill Walker Brian Sandoval Arizona New Mexico e Honorable e Honorable Doug Ducey Susana Martinez California North Dakota e Honorable e Honorable Jerry Brown Doug Burgum Colorado Oklahoma e Honorable e Honorable John Hickenlooper Mary Fallin Guam Oregon e Honorable e Honorable Eddie Baza Calvo Kate Brown Hawaii South Dakota e Honorable e Honorable David Ige Dennis Daugaard Idaho Texas e Honorable e Honorable C. L. “Butch” Otter Greg Abbott Indiana Utah e Honorable e Honorable Eric Holcomb Gary R. Herbert Montana Washington e Honorable e Honorable Steve Bullock Jay R. Inslee Nebraska Wyoming e Honorable e Honorable Pete Ricketts Matt Mead -2- 2017 WGU Commencement.qxp_WGU Commencement 1/23/17 10:24 AM Page 3 Board of Trustees C HAIRMAN e Honorable Jim Geringer Director, Policy & Public Sector, ESRI; Governor, State of Wyoming (1995 – 2003) John W. Bluford III Tammy Johns President, Bluford Healthcare Leadership Institute; CEO, Strategy & Talent; Former President, Truman Medical Centers Former Executive, Manpower Group Cole Clark Dr. Robert W. Mendenhall Executive Director, Higher Education Client Relations President Emeritus, Deloitte Services, LP; Western Governors University Former Global VP for Education and Research, Oracle Corporation Lenny Mendonca Director Emeritus, McKinsey & Company Dr. erese (Terry) Crane President, Crane Associates; Scott D. Pulsipher Former Executive with Apple and AOL President, Western Governors University Dr. -
A Field-Based Inquiry of Innovation Through Making and Craft
Handmade Future: A Field-based Inquiry of Innovation through Making and Craft Samantha Shorey A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2019 Reading Committee: Daniela K. Rosner, Chair Gina Neff, Chair Matthew Powers Christine Harold Megan Finn Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Communication © Copyright 2019 Samantha Shorey University of Washington Abstract Handmade Future: A Field-based Inquiry of Innovation through Making and Craft Samantha Shorey Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Gina Neff Department of Communication Daniela K. Rosner Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering This project analyzes the impact of mediated discourse on the skills, materials, and tools of innovation through a multi-method, three-part study of “making” practices— a growing method of Do-It-Yourself technology design that engages students, hobbyists, and experienced engineers in the building of technological artifacts outside of corporate hierarchies. Making integrates material skills (e.g. sewing, woodworking) and digital fabrication tools (e.g. 3D printing, laser cutting) to produce physical prototypes. These hybrid forms of construction hold significant promise as an inclusive method of innovation, acting as a pathway for women’s participation in technology design. However, if public conceptions of making neglect the contribution of craft and handwork, the potential for innovation will be reduced. This project contributes to existing scholarship in communication and science & technology (STS) studies by elucidating the mechanisms through which media produce symbolic value for technology industries and technology practices. Across this three-part project, I argue that when we expand popular narratives about the tools and practices of technology production, opportunities are also expanded to recognize the diverse contributions—both presently and historically—of people on the peripheries of STEM communities. -
VIP TRANSCRIPT SERIES Interview with Dr. Melanie
VIP TRANSCRIPT SERIES Interview with Dr. Melanie Joy Dr. Melanie Joy, author of Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows, is an internationally acclaimed speaker and writer on carnism, a term she coined. An authority on the psychology of eating animals, she has been featured on programs, including the BBC, NPR, PBS, ABC Australia, and European radio and TV as well. http://www.veganpalooza.com/ Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows: Understanding Carnism and Cultural Conditioning STEVE PRUSSACK: Hello, and welcome back to another session of Veganpalooza. I’m your co-host Steve Prussack. It’s great to be with you, and we’re really excited about our next guest. It’s Dr. Melanie Joy. Dr. Melanie Joy is a Harvard-educated psychologist, professor of psychology and sociology at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. She’s a celebrated speaker and the author of the award-winning primer on carnism, Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows. Let’s welcome to Veganpalooza 2013 Dr. Melanie Joy. DR. MELANIE JOY: Hi, thank you so much for having me. STEVE: Hi, Dr. Joy. How are you today? DR. JOY: I’m doing really well. Thank you so much. STEVE: To start, just for those that aren’t aware of the term “carnism,” can we start with that? How do we define carnism? DR. JOY: Carnism is the invisible belief system that conditions us to eat certain animals. It’s essentially the opposite of veganism. I always like to explain it by explaining how we’re really socialized to believe that it’s only vegans and vegetarians who bring their beliefs to the dinner table. -
Animal Rights and Rhetorical Topoi
Animal Rights and Rhetorical Topoi Tero Kivinen* 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... x 2 Animal Rights ....................................................................................... x 2.1 Animal Welfare ................................................................................ x 2.2 Animal Rights .................................................................................. x 3 The Logos of Animal Rights ................................................................ x 3.1 Rhetoric ............................................................................................ x 3.2 Pisteis ............................................................................................... x 3.3 The Logos of Animal Rights ............................................................ x 4 Animal Rights and Rhetorical Topoi .................................................. x 4.1 Branches of Oratory ......................................................................... x 4.2 The Advantageous ............................................................................ x 4.2.1 Human Health ........................................................................ x 4.2.2 The Environment ................................................................... x 4.2.3 Human Rights ........................................................................ x 5 Concluding Remarks ............................................................................ x 2 Tero Kivinen: -
Trends in Marketing for Books on Animal Rights
Portland State University PDXScholar Book Publishing Final Research Paper English 5-2017 Trends in Marketing for Books on Animal Rights Gloria H. Mulvihill Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/eng_bookpubpaper Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, and the Publishing Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Mulvihill, Gloria H., "Trends in Marketing for Books on Animal Rights" (2017). Book Publishing Final Research Paper. 26. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/eng_bookpubpaper/26 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Book Publishing Final Research Paper by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Mulvihill 1 Trends in Marketing for Books on Animal Rights Gloria H. Mulvihill MA in Book Publishing Thesis Spring 2017 Mulvihill 2 Abstract Though many of us have heard the mantra that we shouldn’t judge a book by its cover, marketers in book publishing bank on the fact that people do and will continue to buy and read books based not only on content, but its aesthetic appeal. This essay will examine the top four marketing trends that can be observed on the Amazon listings for books published on animal rights within the last ten years, specifically relating to titles, cover design, and the intended audience. From graphic adaptations of animals to traditional textbook approaches and animal photography, publishers are striving to evoke interest and investment in literature concerning a politically charged and inherently personal topic. -
Download Checklist
095: Eating with Awareness and Compassion rather than Unconscious Conditioning 10 Point Checklist Dr. Melanie Joy Want to gain as much knowledge as possible out of Get Yourself Optimized? Read on below for a 10 point checklist that gives the next, real steps you can take for introducing these insights and optimizing your life. © 2017 Stephan Spencer 10 STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TODAY Want to take charge of your health, wellness, and success? Here are 10 steps that can move you closer to your goals – today. Understand that I was born in a system (carnism) that conditions me to eat certain animals and that it is internalized, but it doesn’t have to be. Realize how carnism has a profound impact on the way I think and feel about animals, and things like abstraction or some animals lacking individuality may not be accurate. Understand that what I eat is a choice. Reduce my participation in carnism by eating less animal products. Humane products are a PR stunt. Eating and using less animal products will help reduce cruelty. Feel my natural connection and empathy to animals that is hardwired into all humans and recognize their individuality. Eat a whole foods, plant-based diet to provide my body with optimum health and to reduce cruelty to animals, humans, and the environment. Support vegan causes, even if I am not vegan, by contributing money or using my influence to share exposure and valuable information. Be a ‘vegan ally’ – positively support the cause and avoid making meat eaters feeling ashamed, helpless, or attached. The more people who support, the better world I live in. -
Why Are We Outraged About Eating Dog, but Not Bacon? Jared Piazza, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England | CC by ND |
Why Are We Outraged About Eating Dog, but Not Bacon? Jared Piazza, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England | CC BY ND | https://bit.ly/30q6PA4 This Twitter user is typical: © EPA However this belief really just reflects the fact that people spend more time getting to know dogs than pigs. Many people have dogs as pets and through this relationship with dogs we’ve come to learn about them and care deeply for them. But are dogs really that different from other animals we eat? Images of distressed, caged puppies on their way to be slaughtered at Yulin dog meat festival in China have Though obviously not identical, dogs and pigs are quite caused outrage around the world. Angry Facebook posts, similar in all the features that seem to count morally to tweets and online petitions supported by the likes of most people. They have similar social intelligence with Ricky Gervais and Simon Cowell direct us to gruesome rich emotional lives, both can use human-given cues photos of dead dogs, skinned and boiled and hung up on to locate objects, both might be able to use a mirror to butchers hooks. locate objects (though research suggests pigs might have an advantage here) and, of course, both animals have a I too find myself heartbroken by these images. But as deep capacity to suffer and a desire to avoid pain. a vegan I find myself wondering why isn’t there more outrage in the world over the slaughter of other animals. So whether you believe, like the philosopher Peter Singer, For instance, each year in the US roughly 110m pigs are that sentience should be the basis of our assigning moral killed for meat. -
History of Science Society 2020
History of Science Society 2020 The sessions listed below represent the program that would have occurred if the HSS were able to meet in New Orleans. However, the global pandemic has made an in-person meeting impossible. We are grateful to our program chairs, Christine von Oertzen and Soraya de Chadarevian, for constructing such a comprehensive, engaging, and provocative program. Currently, the HSS is investigating how to transform this program into a virtual meeting. Stay tuned for updates! Group 1 · Session 1 Organized Session Earth and Environmental Sciences A Science in Flux: Critical Histories of Geomorphology ORGANIZER Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania CHAIR Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania PRESENTER 1 Solid Danger: Sediment Excess in Enlightenment River Science and its Afterlives, 18th-20th Centuries Giacomo Parrinello Sciences Po PRESENTER 2 Dams, Ditches, and Disciplinary Entrenchment: Legacies of Early 20th Century North American Land and River Engineering in Contemporary Geomorphology Leonora King Kwantlen Polytechnic University 1 PRESENTER 3 Water Facts for the Nation's Future: Data, Development, and the Quantitative Turn in Fluvial Geomorphology, 1945-1975 Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania PRESENTER 4 Decolonizing Sediments Debjani Bhattacharyya Drexel University 2 Group 1 · Session 2 Organized Session Medicine and Health Bodies, Anatomy, and Medico-Legal Expertise ORGANIZER Claire Cage University of South Alabama CHAIR Alisha Rankin Tufts University PRESENTER 1 Jean-Barthélemy Dazille and the Social -
UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Designing Certainty: The Rise of Algorithmic Computing in an Age of Anxiety 1920-1970 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4d02g6x3 Author Dryer, Theodora Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Designing Certainty The Rise of Algorithmic Computing in an Age of Anxiety 1920-1970 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Theodora Dryer Committee in charge: Professor Cathy Gere, Chair Professor Tal Golan Professor Mark Hendrickson Professor Lilly Irani Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charlie Thorpe 2019 Copyright Theodora Dryer, 2019 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Theodora Dryer is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California San Diego 2019 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………………………. iii Table of Contents……………......………………………………………………...……………… -
Joseph Deleon
Social Media at the Margins: Crafting Community Media Before the Web by Joseph Richard DeLeon A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Film, Television, and Media) in the University of Michigan 2021 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Daniel Herbert, Co-Chair Associate Professor Sheila Murphy, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Sarah Murray Professor Lisa Nakamura Joseph Richard DeLeon [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1662-9033 © Joseph Richard DeLeon 2021 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Carol DeLeon and Richard DeLeon. ii Acknowledgements This dissertation is the result of the community and support that shaped my doctoral education in so many important and life-changing ways. I have had the incomparable joy to benefit from great mentors who have fostered my intellectual growth from my first steps on campus all the way to my dissertation defense. To my co-chairs, Dan Herbert and Sheila Murphy, thank you for guiding me through this project and for helping me to harness the strengths of my research, my perspective, and my voice. Thank you to Dan, who has always offered a helpful listening ear and shared a wealth of advice from choosing seminars, to networking, publishing, and finishing a dissertation. Thank you to Sheila for your constant support and encouragement of my writing, my teaching, and my curiosity. I thank Sheila for the many conversations that spurred my writing in new and fruitful directions and that made me feel valued as a scholar and as an individual. I am especially grateful for Sheila’s advice for my research trips to Silicon Valley and for encouraging me to witness Fry’s Electronics firsthand.