UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Designing Certainty: The Rise of Algorithmic Computing in an Age of Anxiety 1920-1970 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4d02g6x3 Author Dryer, Theodora Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Designing Certainty The Rise of Algorithmic Computing in an Age of Anxiety 1920-1970 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Theodora Dryer Committee in charge: Professor Cathy Gere, Chair Professor Tal Golan Professor Mark Hendrickson Professor Lilly Irani Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charlie Thorpe 2019 Copyright Theodora Dryer, 2019 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Theodora Dryer is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California San Diego 2019 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………………………. iii Table of Contents……………......………………………………………………...……………… iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………...v Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………….vii Vita…………………………………………………………………………………………....…xiv Abstract of the Dissertation………………………………………………………………….….xvi Chapter 0: Introduction Mapping Uncertainty Between Crisis and Confidence………….………………………………..…1 Chapter 1: Crisis Crisis as Prologue: The New Agrarian Calculus and Anxious Quanta…………..................................33 Chapter 2: Confidence 1929: The Origins of Confidence Computing in Warsaw, Poland…………………………………70 Chapter 3: Control Seeds of Control: Sugar Beets, Control Logics, and New Deal Data Politics, 1920-1940…………108 Chapter 4: (Un)certainty Machine Over Mind: (Un)certainty Work in India's Rurual Reconstruction Programs and as U.S. Military Method……147 Chapter 5: Climate Computing Cloud Seeds: A Story of Anthropogenic Climate Change, 1940-1970………………..188 Chapter 6: Conclusion Automating (Un)certainty: Digital Cloud Seeds and Confidence Algorithms………………...…...247 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..269 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: “Confidence Intervals,” University College London Special Collections. ................................ 1 Figure 2: UCL, “Confidence Intervals,” https://tinyurl.com/y3utonfd (accessed May 20, 2015). ...... 4 Figure 3: Interval Estimations, Classroom Experiment, 1971. .................................................................. 6 Figure 4: “Evidence of widespread effect of cloud seeding at two Arizona experiments,” 1971........ 22 Figure 5: Duane Michals, “Madame Schrödinger’s Cat,” 1998, From the series Quantum. .................. 33 Figure 6: “Anthropometric Laboratory,” Frances Galton Papers, Digital Special Collections, UCL. 44 Figure 7: “Poultry at Government Farm, Beltsville, Maryland,” 1920. ................................................ 48 Figure 8: “Agriculture and Landownership in Poland,” 1921. ................................................................. 70 Figure 9: Trans., “Sugar Beet Map of Poland,” Statisticia, 1933. .............................................................. 97 Figure 10: "The Accuracy of the "Dilution Method,” 1935. ................................................................... 102 Figure 11: “Confidence Interval for Dilution Experiment,” 1936. ...................................................... 104 Figure 12: Jerzy Neyman’s Dedication to those Murdered by Gestapo, 1952 ..................................... 107 Figure 13: “White Improved Vilmorin Sugar Beet,” Farmers’ Bulletin 52, 1889. ................................... 108 Figure 14: “The Theoretical Beet-Sugar belt of the United States,” Farmers’ Bulletin 52, 1899 .......... 115 Figure 15: “The Michigan Sugar Beet Industry,” 1927. .......................................................................... 119 Figure 16: “Quality Control Charts,” Bell System Technical Journal, 1926. ............................................... 121 Figure 17: 160330 Telephone transmitter, Richard C. Winckel, Western Electric, 1926. ................... 126 Figure 18: “Quality Control Charts,” Bell System Technical Journal, 1926. ................................................ 128 Figure 19: “Composite Plot of Incendiary Sticks” in “Bomb Patterns” .............................................. 147 Figure 20: “Mathematical Machines,” Scientific American, 1949. ............................................................. 149 Figure 21: “An Illustration of the Use of Fiducial Limits,” Sankhyā, 1935. ......................................... 156 Figure 22: “Bengal Anthropometric Survey,” 1945. ............................................................................... 159 Figure 23: “Handling Field, Valparaiso Fla.,” 1935, soon to become Eglin Field Proving Ground. 163 v Figure 24: “Aerial Schematic of Amagasaki, Japan,” 1945.. .................................................................... 164 Figure 25: “Coordinates of the Clock and Instrument Signals on the Tape,” 1943. ........................... 170 Figure 26: “Bombsight View of The Leader in Aiming at: Battleships/Destroyers,” 1944. .............. 173 Figure 27: “Dial Board and Visual Adjustment Board of the Computer of Probabilities,” 1943. .... 175 Figure 28: “The Norden Bombsight,” 1943.. ............................................................................................ 177 Figure 29: "View of Apparatus as Set Up." 1945. ..................................................................................... 183 Figure 30: "How the Bombsight Solves Problems," 1943...................................................................... 185 Figure 31: “The Desert Laboratory,” 1911. .............................................................................................. 188 Figure 32: “Rain Making Firm Takes Mexico Jobs,” 1949. ..................................................................... 210 Figure 33: “Rain Making Pioneer Hints Weather Control,” 1950. ......................................................... 218 Figure 34: “A Detailed Study of Desert Rainfall,” 1933. ......................................................................... 225 Figure 35: RAIN—Water Resources Corres. 1952. ................................................................................ 228 Figure 36: Weather Control Newspaper Article, Undated. ..................................................................... 241 Figure 37: Eduardo Paolozzi, “Conditional Probability Machine,” 1970. ............................................. 247 Figure 38: “Re-Evaluation of the Arizona Cloud-Seeding Experiment,” 1971. ................................... 253 Figure 39: “Probabilistic Logics and the Synthesis of Reliable Organism from Unreliable Components,” 1956....................................................................................................................................... 258 Figure 40: "Algorithm 516: An Algorithm for Obtaining Confidence Intervals," ACM, 1977. ....... 262 vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When I first drove to San Diego cross-country from Boston, Massachusetts to begin my PhD program, I did not anticipate the worlds that would be opened for me or the depths to which my life would change. Designing Certainty is the material product of this time: the individual and collective thought, the fieldwork and community-building, and the personal and intellectual transformations that occur when important questions are put forward and rigorously followed through. This is a PhD dissertation. It is not perfect and not yet what it will soon be in book form. However, this dissertation represents one of the most challenging and rewarding opportunities of my life and there are many people without whom this would not have been possible. In expressions like this, words are just not enough. But the word, ‘acknowledgement’ holds a number of meanings: recognition, appreciation, realization, gratitude, and awareness. I am utterly humbled by the contributions and support that brought this project to fruition. My first expression of gratitude is to my advisor, Cathy Gere. Designing Certainty would not exist without her support and intellectual engagement. She always saw the clarity through the fog, encouraged me to pursue the bold questions, and empowered me to be the scholar and person that I am. She worked with me in the many stages of this project from growing my nascent thoughts, through conceptualizing the whole project, and the many layers of editing. Her work is present in this dissertation and her intellectual and political influence will be with me for the rest of my life. I also hold immense gratitude for Tal Golan, who is one of the earliest advocates of this project. Tal taught me the joy and challenges of historical work and held unwavering support of me and my ideas throughout my PhD. He writes and teaches with a balance of humor and rigor that I emulate in my own scholarship. The pages of this dissertation are likewise shaped by the personal support and intellectual
Recommended publications
  • A Field-Based Inquiry of Innovation Through Making and Craft
    Handmade Future: A Field-based Inquiry of Innovation through Making and Craft Samantha Shorey A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2019 Reading Committee: Daniela K. Rosner, Chair Gina Neff, Chair Matthew Powers Christine Harold Megan Finn Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Communication © Copyright 2019 Samantha Shorey University of Washington Abstract Handmade Future: A Field-based Inquiry of Innovation through Making and Craft Samantha Shorey Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Gina Neff Department of Communication Daniela K. Rosner Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering This project analyzes the impact of mediated discourse on the skills, materials, and tools of innovation through a multi-method, three-part study of “making” practices— a growing method of Do-It-Yourself technology design that engages students, hobbyists, and experienced engineers in the building of technological artifacts outside of corporate hierarchies. Making integrates material skills (e.g. sewing, woodworking) and digital fabrication tools (e.g. 3D printing, laser cutting) to produce physical prototypes. These hybrid forms of construction hold significant promise as an inclusive method of innovation, acting as a pathway for women’s participation in technology design. However, if public conceptions of making neglect the contribution of craft and handwork, the potential for innovation will be reduced. This project contributes to existing scholarship in communication and science & technology (STS) studies by elucidating the mechanisms through which media produce symbolic value for technology industries and technology practices. Across this three-part project, I argue that when we expand popular narratives about the tools and practices of technology production, opportunities are also expanded to recognize the diverse contributions—both presently and historically—of people on the peripheries of STEM communities.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Science Society 2020
    History of Science Society 2020 The sessions listed below represent the program that would have occurred if the HSS were able to meet in New Orleans. However, the global pandemic has made an in-person meeting impossible. We are grateful to our program chairs, Christine von Oertzen and Soraya de Chadarevian, for constructing such a comprehensive, engaging, and provocative program. Currently, the HSS is investigating how to transform this program into a virtual meeting. Stay tuned for updates! Group 1 · Session 1 Organized Session Earth and Environmental Sciences A Science in Flux: Critical Histories of Geomorphology ORGANIZER Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania CHAIR Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania PRESENTER 1 Solid Danger: Sediment Excess in Enlightenment River Science and its Afterlives, 18th-20th Centuries Giacomo Parrinello Sciences Po PRESENTER 2 Dams, Ditches, and Disciplinary Entrenchment: Legacies of Early 20th Century North American Land and River Engineering in Contemporary Geomorphology Leonora King Kwantlen Polytechnic University 1 PRESENTER 3 Water Facts for the Nation's Future: Data, Development, and the Quantitative Turn in Fluvial Geomorphology, 1945-1975 Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania PRESENTER 4 Decolonizing Sediments Debjani Bhattacharyya Drexel University 2 Group 1 · Session 2 Organized Session Medicine and Health Bodies, Anatomy, and Medico-Legal Expertise ORGANIZER Claire Cage University of South Alabama CHAIR Alisha Rankin Tufts University PRESENTER 1 Jean-Barthélemy Dazille and the Social
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Deleon
    Social Media at the Margins: Crafting Community Media Before the Web by Joseph Richard DeLeon A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Film, Television, and Media) in the University of Michigan 2021 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Daniel Herbert, Co-Chair Associate Professor Sheila Murphy, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Sarah Murray Professor Lisa Nakamura Joseph Richard DeLeon [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1662-9033 © Joseph Richard DeLeon 2021 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Carol DeLeon and Richard DeLeon. ii Acknowledgements This dissertation is the result of the community and support that shaped my doctoral education in so many important and life-changing ways. I have had the incomparable joy to benefit from great mentors who have fostered my intellectual growth from my first steps on campus all the way to my dissertation defense. To my co-chairs, Dan Herbert and Sheila Murphy, thank you for guiding me through this project and for helping me to harness the strengths of my research, my perspective, and my voice. Thank you to Dan, who has always offered a helpful listening ear and shared a wealth of advice from choosing seminars, to networking, publishing, and finishing a dissertation. Thank you to Sheila for your constant support and encouragement of my writing, my teaching, and my curiosity. I thank Sheila for the many conversations that spurred my writing in new and fruitful directions and that made me feel valued as a scholar and as an individual. I am especially grateful for Sheila’s advice for my research trips to Silicon Valley and for encouraging me to witness Fry’s Electronics firsthand.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOT VIRTUAL FORUM 2020, 8-10 October 2020 PROGRAM (JOINT SHOT‐HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED)
    SHOT VIRTUAL FORUM 2020, 8-10 October 2020 PROGRAM (JOINT SHOT-HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED) Thursday, 8 October 2020 12:00 PM – 2:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time) ECIG Graduate Student Workshop I Organizer: Tasha Schoenstein (Harvard University), Betsy Frederick-Rothwell (University of Texas, Austin), and Juyoung Lee (Johns Hopkins University) Moderator: Juyoung Lee (Johns Hopkins University) Mentor: Victor Seow (Harvard University) Mentor: Prakash Kumar (Pennsylvania State University) Viswanathan Venkataraman (King's College, London): Tapping the ‘Underground Reservoir’: The Deep Wells of London's Water Companies in the Late 19th Century You Wang (University of California, Los Angeles): Good Dikes: Engineering and Community‐Based Approaches to Agricultural Knowledge in Early Modern China Thamarai Selvan (Indian Institute of Technology Madras): Histories of Musical Instrument Making as Craft and Technology in Colonial and Post‐colonial South India Cheri Johnson (Virginia Tech): Dissertation Proposal: Boundary‐walkers: Insights into expertise and practices of translation between Indigenous knowledge and Western natural science at the climate change forefront Durgesh Solanki (Johns Hopkins University): Imperial Disease: The British Empire and the Management of Plague in the Colonies 3:00 PM – 5:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time) ECIG Graduate Student Workshop II Organizer: Tasha Schoenstein (Harvard University), Betsy Frederick-Rothwell (University of Texas, Austin), and Juyoung Lee (Johns Hopkins University) Moderators: Tasha Schoenstein (Harvard University),
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY PARALLEL SESSION SCHEDULE SHOT ANNUAL MEETING 2021, NEW ORLEANS* (JOINT SHOT-HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED) Version 7 August 2021
    PRELIMINARY PARALLEL SESSION SCHEDULE SHOT ANNUAL MEETING 2021, NEW ORLEANS* (JOINT SHOT-HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED) Version 7 August 2021 Thursday, 18 November 2021 1:00 PM – 6:00 PM SHOT Registration Desk (Poydras at Napoleon Foyer, 3rd floor) Thursday, 18 November 2021 3:30 PM – 5:00 PM T1: Technology and the Modern North American City Organizer: David Hochfelder (University at Albany, SUNY) Chair: Jonathan Coopersmith (Texas A&M University) Commentator: Jonathan Coopersmith (Texas A&M University) Daniel Konikoff (University of Toronto): ShotSpotter and Urban Space Douwe Schipper (Johns Hopkins University): "Government Is Not Created to Serve Experts”: The Baltimore Highway Revolt as Resistance against a Technopolitical Regime David Hochfelder (University at Albany, SUNY): Operation Breakthrough: An Experiment in Marketbased Housing Construction T2: ROUNDTABLE: Technologies of Disaster in the COVID Era: An Agenda for Disaster Research Organizer: Scott Knowles (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) Panelists: Ashley Carse (Vanderbilt University) Marccus Hendricks (University of Maryland) Hyunah Keum (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) Andy Horowitz (Tulane University) Ashley Rogers (Whitney Museum) Buhm Soon Park (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) Kate Starbird (University of Washington) Jacqueline Wernimont (Dartmouth University) T3: Law, Politics, and Technological Regimes Chair: TBA Andrew McGee (Carnegie Mellon University): “The Electronic Origins of the Neoliberal Order:
    [Show full text]
  • National Humanities Center Annual Report, 2018–19
    2018 2019 NATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER EDITORS THE NATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER is a private, Olympia Friday nonprofit organization, and the only independent institute of Donald Solomon its kind dedicated exclusively to advanced study in all areas of the humanities. Through its residential fellowship program, IMAGES the Center provides scholars with the resources necessary to joel Elliott generate new knowledge and further understanding of all forms of cultural expression, social interaction, and human thought. DESIGN Through its education programs, the Center strengthens Kompleks creative teaching on the collegiate and pre-collegiate levels. Through public engagement intimately linked to its scholarly and educational programs, the Center promotes understanding of the humanities and advocates for appreciation of their foundational role in a democratic society. The National Humanities Center does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national and ethnic origin, sexual orientation or preference, gender identity, or age in the administration of its selection policies, educational policies, and other Center administered programs. The National Humanities Center’s Report (ISSN 1040-130X) is printed on recycled paper. Copyright ©2020 by National Humanities Center 7 T.W. Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12256, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2256 Tel: 919-549-0661 Fax: 919-990-8535 [email protected] nationalhumanitiescenter.org 2018 — 2019 Annual Report Contents Message from the President and Director ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 APA Central Division Meeting Program
    The American Philosophical Association CENTRAL DIVISION ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM PALMER HOUSE HILTON HOTEL CHICAGO, ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 26 – 29, 2020 Mention coupon code ZAPC20 and receive a 20% discount on all pb & a 40% discount on all hc only Offer good until 3/29/20 Order online: www.sunypress.edu Order by phone: 877.204.6073 or 703.661.1575 Hyperthematics Life as Insinuation The Real The Logic of Value George Santayana’s Metaphysical Club Marc M. Anderson Hermeneutics of Finite The Philosophers, Life and Human Self Their Debates, John Dewey Katarzyna and Selected Writings and Daoist Thought Kremplewska from 1870 to 1885 Experiments in Frank X. Ryan, Intra-cultural Beyond the Brian E. Butler, and Philosophy, Troubled Water James A. Good, eds Volume One of Shifei Introduction by Jim Behuniak From Disputation John R. Shook to Walking-Two-Roads John Dewey in the Zhuangzi Pragmatism and Confucian Lin Ma and Applied Thought Jaap van Brakel William James Experiments and the Challenges in Intra-cultural Psychoanalysis of Contemporary Life Philosophy, and Repetition Clifford S. Stagoll and Volume Two Why Do We Keep Making Michael P. Levine, eds Jim Behuniak the Same Mistakes? Juan-David Nasio Genealogies Speaking Translated by of the Secular Face to Face David Pettigrew The Making of Modern The Visionary Philosophy German Thought of María Lugones Beyond Bergson Willem Styfhals and Pedro J. DiPietro, Examining Race Stéphane Symons, eds Jennifer McWeeny, and and Colonialism Shireen Roshanravan, through the Writings Beyond the Subject eds. of Henri Bergson Nietzsche, Heidegger, Andrea J. Pitts and and Hermeneutics Subjects Mark William Gianni Vattimo That Matter Westmoreland, eds Translated, edited, and Philosophy, Feminism, with an introduction by and Postcolonial Theory John Marshall’s Peter Carravetta Namita Goswami Constitutionalism Clyde H.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing with Dr. Timnit Gebru — #Isupporttimnit #Believeblackwomen
    Google Walkout For Real Change 810 Followers · About Follow Sign in Get started Standing with Dr. Timnit Gebru — #ISupportTimnit #BelieveBlackWomen Google Walkout For Real Change 2 days ago · 83 min read We, the undersigned, stand in solidarity with Dr. Timnit Gebru, who was terminated from her position as Sta Research Scientist and Co-Lead of Ethical Articial Intelligence (AI) team at Google, following unprecedented research censorship. We call on Google Research to strengthen its commitment to research integrity and to unequivocally commit to supporting research that honors the commitments made in Google’s AI Principles. Until December 2, 2020, Dr. Gebru was one of very few Black women Research Scientists at the company, which boasts a dismal 1.6% Black women employees overall. Her research accomplishments are extensive, and have profoundly impacted academic scholarship and public policy. Dr. Gebru is a pathbreaking scientist doing some of the most important work to ensure just and accountable AI and to create a welcoming and diverse AI research Deld. Instead of being embraced by Google as an exceptionally talented and prolic contributor, Dr. Gebru has faced defensiveness, racism, gaslighting, research censorship, and now a retaliatory Dring. In an email to Dr. Gebru’s team on the evening of December 2, 2020, Google executives claimed that she had chosen to resign. This is false. In their direct correspondence with Dr. Gebru, these executives informed her that her termination was immediate, and pointed to an email she sent to a Google Brain diversity and inclusion mailing list as pretext. The contents of this email are important.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production
    Society for the Anthropology of Work Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production Published on: Jul 19, 2021 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Society for the Anthropology of Work Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production “Working to Live: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production” Proposed Publication Date: Winter 2022 Deadline: November 29, 2021 This special issue of the Anthropology of Work Review calls for contributions that explore capitalist immunities and dynamics of surviving work in systems of knowledge production. Kathryn Olivarius (2019) defines immunocapital as the social, economic and political power and privilege that certain populations have based on their socially implicated and biological conditions of immunity from lethal conditions and agents of harm. This issue expands upon Olivarius’ concept to open up a broader discussion in the anthropology of work on the survival tactics of privilege and power that individuals and institutions use to build up immunities—real, performed, and imagined—in academia and other sites of knowledge production. Human and nonhuman labor are integral to the infrastructural spaces and lifeways in which knowledge is produced, valued, and disseminated. From the transnational extractive tactics of the imperial university (Chatterjee and Maira 2014) and higher education’s “plantation politics” (Williams and Tuitt 2021) to global markets of learning (Harney and Moten 2013), neocolonial regimes of data mining and labor organization (Amrute and Murillo 2020; Couldry and Mejias 2019), and calls for a third world university (la paperson 2017), enslavement and settler colonialism's enduring and exploitative projects of racial capitalism (Robinson 1983; Jenkins and Leroy 2021) continue to thrive in the worlds of work that knowledge production requires.
    [Show full text]
  • Computers Can't Get Wet: Queer Slippage and Play in the Rhetoric Of
    Title Page Computers Can’t Get Wet: Queer Slippage and Play in the Rhetoric of Computational Structure by Sandra L. Nelson B.A. English Literature, St. John’s University, 2013 M.A. English Rhetoric and Composition, University of Pittsburgh, 2017 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2020 Committee Page UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Sandra L. Nelson It was defended on March 31, 2020 and approved by Peter Campbell, Assistant Professor, Department of English Benjamin Miller, Assistant Professor, Department of English Alison Langmead, Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences Thesis Advisor/Dissertation Director: Annette Vee, Associate Professor, Department of English ii Copyright © by Sandra L. Nelson 2020 iii Abstract Computers Can’t Get Wet: Queer Slippage and Play in the Rhetoric of Computational Structure Sandra L. Nelson, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2020 This dissertation takes up the argument that computers are rhetorical structures that can be queered. Using cross-disciplinary methods, it examines the interplay that occurs between the layers of the computational stack – focusing in particular on the slippage between materiality, code, interface, and the resulting software – and analyzes the narratives that each layer perpetuates individually and in tandem. It applies a multi-faceted approach to queer theory in order to reveal the ways in which anti-normative computer users critique, resist, and subvert these narratives. When computers are approached as always already queer, the possibilities for disruption that exist within their limits materialize and present themselves as opportunities for intersectional exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Harnessing the Computational and Social Sciences to Solve Critical Societal Problems
    INTRODUCTION Harnessing the Computational and Social Sciences to Solve Critical Societal Problems Elizabeth Mynatt (Georgia Tech, co-chair) Duncan Watts (University of Pennsylvania, co-chair) Nadya Bliss (Arizona State University) Alondra Nelson (Social Science Research Council & Institute for Advanced Study) Willie Pearson (Georgia Tech) Rob Rutenbar (University of Pittsburgh) INTRODUCTION The NSF CISE Advisory Committee strongly researchers across the breadth of the CISE and endorses the findings from the round table report SBE communities, and highlighted a range of joint entitled “Harnessing the Computational and Social research themes and cross-cutting challenges. This Sciences to Solve Critical Societal Problems,” round table report captures and crystalizes these co-chaired by Elizabeth Mynatt (Georgia Institute themes and challenges. A follow-on joint meeting of Technology, CISE Advisory Committee member) of the CISE and SBE Advisory Committees in and Duncan Watts (University of Pennsylvania, SBE December 2020 confirmed the high level of ongoing Advisory Committee member) and funded jointly interest in joint collaboration on these important by CISE and SBE. Starting from a first-ever joint research topics. meeting of both CISE and SBE Advisory Committees in late 2019, a joint round table meeting (held Magdalena Balazinska and Rob Rutenbar, virtually in May 2020 due to COVID), brought CISE Advisory Committee co-chairs, together a vibrant and diverse community of on behalf of the CISE Advisory Committee INTRODUCTION CONTENTS PAGE 4 BACKGROUND 6 ROUNDTABLE OVERVIEW 10 MAJOR THEMES SPANNING ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIONS 15 OPPORTUNITIES 17 FUTURE STEPS 19 APPENDICES 24 BIBLIOGRAPHY INTRODUCTION 1.0 BACKGROUND It is increasingly apparent that many of the systems on which our society depends for its health, prosperity, and security are neither purely social nor purely computational ones.
    [Show full text]