DOCSLIB.ORG

Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production Society for the Anthropology of Work Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production Published on: Jul 19, 2021 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Society for the Anthropology of Work Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production “Working to Live: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production” Proposed Publication Date: Winter 2022 Deadline: November 29, 2021 This special issue of the Anthropology of Work Review calls for contributions that explore capitalist immunities and dynamics of surviving work in systems of knowledge production. Kathryn Olivarius (2019) defines immunocapital as the social, economic and political power and privilege that certain populations have based on their socially implicated and biological conditions of immunity from lethal conditions and agents of harm. This issue expands upon Olivarius’ concept to open up a broader discussion in the anthropology of work on the survival tactics of privilege and power that individuals and institutions use to build up immunities—real, performed, and imagined—in academia and other sites of knowledge production. Human and nonhuman labor are integral to the infrastructural spaces and lifeways in which knowledge is produced, valued, and disseminated. From the transnational extractive tactics of the imperial university (Chatterjee and Maira 2014) and higher education’s “plantation politics” (Williams and Tuitt 2021) to global markets of learning (Harney and Moten 2013), neocolonial regimes of data mining and labor organization (Amrute and Murillo 2020; Couldry and Mejias 2019), and calls for a third world university (la paperson 2017), enslavement and settler colonialism's enduring and exploitative projects of racial capitalism (Robinson 1983; Jenkins and Leroy 2021) continue to thrive in the worlds of work that knowledge production requires. Today’s conditions of financial austerity, labor organizing, predation, gig work, data extraction, and digital inequity reveal knowledge work’s historical role in structuring projects of enslavement, dispossession, militarized occupation, and genocide. Redlining, missionary and residential schooling, carceral labor, attacks on critical race theory, longstanding patterns of researching and denying access to vaccines and other products of knowledge, and the funding of scientific racism continue to inform the geographic, theoretical and methodological paths of struggles for educational justice, academic freedom, abolition, reparations, and repair. Studying labor practices and work experiences in systems of knowledge production makes clear the historically constitutive relationships between oppressions based on race, ethnicity, caste, religion, and indigeneity and capitalism’s investments in bodily immunities and materialities (Ambedkar 2014; Carsten 2019; Kauanui 2008; Mosse 2018; Shah 2001; Trouillot 1995; Varma 2020). With these relationships in mind, this special issue calls for further 2 Society for the Anthropology of Work Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production investigation about how these tactics of exploitation shapeshift (Cox 2015) and show up in homes, classrooms, workplaces, publics, and educational systems (Shange 2019; Sojoyner 2016; Zambrana 2018). What enables or supports individual and collective forms of access to social, economic, and political forms of capital in systems of learning, education and knowledge creation? What are the new and surprising ways that capitalism has shown itself as immune to its competing logics in academic settings? Given the centrality of labor to wealth-accumulating complexes of enslavement, caste oppression, militarized state violence, and settler colonialism, how are contemporary forms of immunocapital investing in sites and projects of knowledge production? What kinds of tactics of surveillance, labor exploitation, radical care and collective survival facilitate and challenge its value in the production of knowledge? Finally, how can investigations of immunocapital’s diverse pathways expand anthropological understandings of what it means to work and survive in knowledge work systems today? We welcome submissions that name and frame labor practices that undergird immunocapitalisms and their infrastructures of knowledge production. We also welcome articles that foreground research on movements within knowledge-work systems that unsettle and dismantle practices of racial, labor and gender exploitation in transnational and global contexts and that center perspectives of underrepresented and marginalized groups. Submissions may discuss historical and contemporary conditions of labor and work in knowledge-work across and beyond the following political, methodological and ethical arenas: racialized and gendered labor (Navarro et al. 2013; Tate 2016; Tate and Page 2018); intellectual canon setting (McLaurin 2001; Harrison 2010; Bolles 2013); citational praxis (Ahmed 2017; Cite Black Women n.d.; McKittrick 2021); data sharing and extraction and the politics of location (Al-Bulushi et al. 2020; Gunasekara 2020; Tsosie et al. 2020); research ethics, co-laboring, and collaboration (Benjamin 2016; Günel et al 2020; Harding 2015; Riley and Bezanson 2018; Rodriguez 2001; Smith 2013; Harrison 2012; Visweswaran 1994); caste, class, rank, and hierarchy prestige networks (Kawa 2018; Leighton 2020; Rege 2007; Subramaniam 2019); disability justice (Bailey and Mobley 2019; Block 2020, Friedner and Zoanni 2018; Ginsburg and Rapp 2013, 2020; Schalk 2013); open access (Besky et al. 2021; Brown et al. 2018; Jackson and Anderson 2014); digital and language accessibility (Brodkin et al 2011; Flores 2016; Shulist and Rice 2019; Sarkar 2021); scholar-activist engagements 3 Society for the Anthropology of Work Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production (Bailey and Peoples 2017; Carter 2020; Dhillon and Estes 2016; Mullings 2005; James 2015; West 2005; Finkelstein 2019); academic labor organizing and unionization (McCaffrey et al 2020; Pearson 2015); predation, contingency, and precarity (Berlant 2011; Platzer and Allison 2018; Lyon 2018); invisible labor and care work (Kraemer 2018; Williams 2016); harm and sexual violence in educational settings (Berry et al. 2017; Clancy et al. 2014; Nelson et al. 2017; Prescod-Weinstein 2020; Simpson 2018; Todd 2016); and institutional reparations, repair, and restorative justice work (Morini 2019; Rosa and Díaz 2019; Thomas 2011, 2019; Schirrer 2020). Submissions can be original research articles, long-form interviews, multimodal, auto- ethnographic, or theoretical in content but should be no more than 8,000 words and uploaded to the Anthropology of Work Review’s ScholarOne portal before midnight PST on November 29, 2021. Contributors are also invited to pitch ideas for supplementary materials to be published in the Society for the Anthropology of Work’s short-form, open access web publication, Exertions. These materials might include media objects or other materials that would help instructors and students to engage with the article more deeply or provide reflections on the relationship between teaching, learning and laboring as an academic. An optional one-page précis may be included as a supplementary document along with the main submission. Questions and inquiries can be directed to the special issue’s coeditors. Sareeta Amrute, [email protected] Mythri Jegathesan, [email protected] Preview Image Photo by Mythri Jegathesan. References Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Al-Bulushi, Samar, Sahana Ghosh, and Madiha Tahir. 2020. “American Anthropology, Decolonization, and the Politics of Location.” American Anthropologist website, May 28. Ambedkar, B.R., S. Anand, Arundhati Roy, and Santarama Gandhi. 2014. Annihilation of Caste: The Annotated Critical Edition. London: Verso. 4 Society for the Anthropology of Work Call for Papers: Immunocapital in Systems of Knowledge Production Amrute, Sareeta, and Luis Felipe R. Murillo. 2020. “Introduction: Computing in/from the South.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6(1). Bailey, Moya, and Izetta A. Mobley. 2019. “Work in the Intersections: A Black Feminist Disability Framework.” Gender and Society 33(1): 19–40. _____, and Whitney Peoples. 2017. “Towards a Black Feminist Health Science Studies.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 3(2). Benjamin, Ruha. 2016. “Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-Based Bioethics.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 41(6): 967–990. Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Berry, Maya, Claudia Chávez Argüelles, Shanya Cordis, Sarah Ihmoud, and Elizabeth Velásquez Estrada. 2017. “Toward a Fugitive Anthropology: Gender, Race, and Violence in the Field.” Cultural Anthropology 32(4): 537–65. Besky, Sarah, Ilana Gershon, Alex Nading, Christopher Nelson, Katie Nelson, Heather Paxson, and Brad Weiss. 2021. “Opening Access to AAA’s Publishing Future.” Member Voices, Fieldsights, June 30. Block, Pamela. 2020. “Activism, Anthropology, and Disability Studies in Times of Austerity.” Current Anthropology 61(S21): S68–S75. Bolles, Lynne. 2013. “Telling the Story Straight: Black Feminist Intellectual Thought in Anthropology.” Transforming Anthropology 21(1): 57–71. Brodkin, Karen, Sandra Morgen, and Janis Hutchinson. 2011. “Anthropology as White Public Space?” American Anthropologist 113(4): 545–56. Brown, Nina, Marcel LaFlamme, and Sarah Lyon. 2018. “What Happened, or, Impasses and Future Horizons for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Field-Based Inquiry of Innovation Through Making and Craft
    Handmade Future: A Field-based Inquiry of Innovation through Making and Craft Samantha Shorey A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2019 Reading Committee: Daniela K. Rosner, Chair Gina Neff, Chair Matthew Powers Christine Harold Megan Finn Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Communication © Copyright 2019 Samantha Shorey University of Washington Abstract Handmade Future: A Field-based Inquiry of Innovation through Making and Craft Samantha Shorey Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Gina Neff Department of Communication Daniela K. Rosner Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering This project analyzes the impact of mediated discourse on the skills, materials, and tools of innovation through a multi-method, three-part study of “making” practices— a growing method of Do-It-Yourself technology design that engages students, hobbyists, and experienced engineers in the building of technological artifacts outside of corporate hierarchies. Making integrates material skills (e.g. sewing, woodworking) and digital fabrication tools (e.g. 3D printing, laser cutting) to produce physical prototypes. These hybrid forms of construction hold significant promise as an inclusive method of innovation, acting as a pathway for women’s participation in technology design. However, if public conceptions of making neglect the contribution of craft and handwork, the potential for innovation will be reduced. This project contributes to existing scholarship in communication and science & technology (STS) studies by elucidating the mechanisms through which media produce symbolic value for technology industries and technology practices. Across this three-part project, I argue that when we expand popular narratives about the tools and practices of technology production, opportunities are also expanded to recognize the diverse contributions—both presently and historically—of people on the peripheries of STEM communities.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Science Society 2020
    History of Science Society 2020 The sessions listed below represent the program that would have occurred if the HSS were able to meet in New Orleans. However, the global pandemic has made an in-person meeting impossible. We are grateful to our program chairs, Christine von Oertzen and Soraya de Chadarevian, for constructing such a comprehensive, engaging, and provocative program. Currently, the HSS is investigating how to transform this program into a virtual meeting. Stay tuned for updates! Group 1 · Session 1 Organized Session Earth and Environmental Sciences A Science in Flux: Critical Histories of Geomorphology ORGANIZER Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania CHAIR Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania PRESENTER 1 Solid Danger: Sediment Excess in Enlightenment River Science and its Afterlives, 18th-20th Centuries Giacomo Parrinello Sciences Po PRESENTER 2 Dams, Ditches, and Disciplinary Entrenchment: Legacies of Early 20th Century North American Land and River Engineering in Contemporary Geomorphology Leonora King Kwantlen Polytechnic University 1 PRESENTER 3 Water Facts for the Nation's Future: Data, Development, and the Quantitative Turn in Fluvial Geomorphology, 1945-1975 Etienne Benson University of Pennsylvania PRESENTER 4 Decolonizing Sediments Debjani Bhattacharyya Drexel University 2 Group 1 · Session 2 Organized Session Medicine and Health Bodies, Anatomy, and Medico-Legal Expertise ORGANIZER Claire Cage University of South Alabama CHAIR Alisha Rankin Tufts University PRESENTER 1 Jean-Barthélemy Dazille and the Social
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Designing Certainty: The Rise of Algorithmic Computing in an Age of Anxiety 1920-1970 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4d02g6x3 Author Dryer, Theodora Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Designing Certainty The Rise of Algorithmic Computing in an Age of Anxiety 1920-1970 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Theodora Dryer Committee in charge: Professor Cathy Gere, Chair Professor Tal Golan Professor Mark Hendrickson Professor Lilly Irani Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charlie Thorpe 2019 Copyright Theodora Dryer, 2019 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Theodora Dryer is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California San Diego 2019 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………………………. iii Table of Contents……………......………………………………………………...………………
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Deleon
    Social Media at the Margins: Crafting Community Media Before the Web by Joseph Richard DeLeon A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Film, Television, and Media) in the University of Michigan 2021 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Daniel Herbert, Co-Chair Associate Professor Sheila Murphy, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Sarah Murray Professor Lisa Nakamura Joseph Richard DeLeon [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1662-9033 © Joseph Richard DeLeon 2021 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Carol DeLeon and Richard DeLeon. ii Acknowledgements This dissertation is the result of the community and support that shaped my doctoral education in so many important and life-changing ways. I have had the incomparable joy to benefit from great mentors who have fostered my intellectual growth from my first steps on campus all the way to my dissertation defense. To my co-chairs, Dan Herbert and Sheila Murphy, thank you for guiding me through this project and for helping me to harness the strengths of my research, my perspective, and my voice. Thank you to Dan, who has always offered a helpful listening ear and shared a wealth of advice from choosing seminars, to networking, publishing, and finishing a dissertation. Thank you to Sheila for your constant support and encouragement of my writing, my teaching, and my curiosity. I thank Sheila for the many conversations that spurred my writing in new and fruitful directions and that made me feel valued as a scholar and as an individual. I am especially grateful for Sheila’s advice for my research trips to Silicon Valley and for encouraging me to witness Fry’s Electronics firsthand.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOT VIRTUAL FORUM 2020, 8-10 October 2020 PROGRAM (JOINT SHOT‐HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED)
    SHOT VIRTUAL FORUM 2020, 8-10 October 2020 PROGRAM (JOINT SHOT-HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED) Thursday, 8 October 2020 12:00 PM – 2:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time) ECIG Graduate Student Workshop I Organizer: Tasha Schoenstein (Harvard University), Betsy Frederick-Rothwell (University of Texas, Austin), and Juyoung Lee (Johns Hopkins University) Moderator: Juyoung Lee (Johns Hopkins University) Mentor: Victor Seow (Harvard University) Mentor: Prakash Kumar (Pennsylvania State University) Viswanathan Venkataraman (King's College, London): Tapping the ‘Underground Reservoir’: The Deep Wells of London's Water Companies in the Late 19th Century You Wang (University of California, Los Angeles): Good Dikes: Engineering and Community‐Based Approaches to Agricultural Knowledge in Early Modern China Thamarai Selvan (Indian Institute of Technology Madras): Histories of Musical Instrument Making as Craft and Technology in Colonial and Post‐colonial South India Cheri Johnson (Virginia Tech): Dissertation Proposal: Boundary‐walkers: Insights into expertise and practices of translation between Indigenous knowledge and Western natural science at the climate change forefront Durgesh Solanki (Johns Hopkins University): Imperial Disease: The British Empire and the Management of Plague in the Colonies 3:00 PM – 5:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time) ECIG Graduate Student Workshop II Organizer: Tasha Schoenstein (Harvard University), Betsy Frederick-Rothwell (University of Texas, Austin), and Juyoung Lee (Johns Hopkins University) Moderators: Tasha Schoenstein (Harvard University),
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY PARALLEL SESSION SCHEDULE SHOT ANNUAL MEETING 2021, NEW ORLEANS* (JOINT SHOT-HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED) Version 7 August 2021
    PRELIMINARY PARALLEL SESSION SCHEDULE SHOT ANNUAL MEETING 2021, NEW ORLEANS* (JOINT SHOT-HSS SESSIONS INCLUDED) Version 7 August 2021 Thursday, 18 November 2021 1:00 PM – 6:00 PM SHOT Registration Desk (Poydras at Napoleon Foyer, 3rd floor) Thursday, 18 November 2021 3:30 PM – 5:00 PM T1: Technology and the Modern North American City Organizer: David Hochfelder (University at Albany, SUNY) Chair: Jonathan Coopersmith (Texas A&M University) Commentator: Jonathan Coopersmith (Texas A&M University) Daniel Konikoff (University of Toronto): ShotSpotter and Urban Space Douwe Schipper (Johns Hopkins University): "Government Is Not Created to Serve Experts”: The Baltimore Highway Revolt as Resistance against a Technopolitical Regime David Hochfelder (University at Albany, SUNY): Operation Breakthrough: An Experiment in Marketbased Housing Construction T2: ROUNDTABLE: Technologies of Disaster in the COVID Era: An Agenda for Disaster Research Organizer: Scott Knowles (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) Panelists: Ashley Carse (Vanderbilt University) Marccus Hendricks (University of Maryland) Hyunah Keum (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) Andy Horowitz (Tulane University) Ashley Rogers (Whitney Museum) Buhm Soon Park (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) Kate Starbird (University of Washington) Jacqueline Wernimont (Dartmouth University) T3: Law, Politics, and Technological Regimes Chair: TBA Andrew McGee (Carnegie Mellon University): “The Electronic Origins of the Neoliberal Order:
    [Show full text]
  • National Humanities Center Annual Report, 2018–19
    2018 2019 NATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER EDITORS THE NATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER is a private, Olympia Friday nonprofit organization, and the only independent institute of Donald Solomon its kind dedicated exclusively to advanced study in all areas of the humanities. Through its residential fellowship program, IMAGES the Center provides scholars with the resources necessary to joel Elliott generate new knowledge and further understanding of all forms of cultural expression, social interaction, and human thought. DESIGN Through its education programs, the Center strengthens Kompleks creative teaching on the collegiate and pre-collegiate levels. Through public engagement intimately linked to its scholarly and educational programs, the Center promotes understanding of the humanities and advocates for appreciation of their foundational role in a democratic society. The National Humanities Center does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national and ethnic origin, sexual orientation or preference, gender identity, or age in the administration of its selection policies, educational policies, and other Center administered programs. The National Humanities Center’s Report (ISSN 1040-130X) is printed on recycled paper. Copyright ©2020 by National Humanities Center 7 T.W. Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12256, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2256 Tel: 919-549-0661 Fax: 919-990-8535 [email protected] nationalhumanitiescenter.org 2018 — 2019 Annual Report Contents Message from the President and Director ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 APA Central Division Meeting Program
    The American Philosophical Association CENTRAL DIVISION ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM PALMER HOUSE HILTON HOTEL CHICAGO, ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 26 – 29, 2020 Mention coupon code ZAPC20 and receive a 20% discount on all pb & a 40% discount on all hc only Offer good until 3/29/20 Order online: www.sunypress.edu Order by phone: 877.204.6073 or 703.661.1575 Hyperthematics Life as Insinuation The Real The Logic of Value George Santayana’s Metaphysical Club Marc M. Anderson Hermeneutics of Finite The Philosophers, Life and Human Self Their Debates, John Dewey Katarzyna and Selected Writings and Daoist Thought Kremplewska from 1870 to 1885 Experiments in Frank X. Ryan, Intra-cultural Beyond the Brian E. Butler, and Philosophy, Troubled Water James A. Good, eds Volume One of Shifei Introduction by Jim Behuniak From Disputation John R. Shook to Walking-Two-Roads John Dewey in the Zhuangzi Pragmatism and Confucian Lin Ma and Applied Thought Jaap van Brakel William James Experiments and the Challenges in Intra-cultural Psychoanalysis of Contemporary Life Philosophy, and Repetition Clifford S. Stagoll and Volume Two Why Do We Keep Making Michael P. Levine, eds Jim Behuniak the Same Mistakes? Juan-David Nasio Genealogies Speaking Translated by of the Secular Face to Face David Pettigrew The Making of Modern The Visionary Philosophy German Thought of María Lugones Beyond Bergson Willem Styfhals and Pedro J. DiPietro, Examining Race Stéphane Symons, eds Jennifer McWeeny, and and Colonialism Shireen Roshanravan, through the Writings Beyond the Subject eds. of Henri Bergson Nietzsche, Heidegger, Andrea J. Pitts and and Hermeneutics Subjects Mark William Gianni Vattimo That Matter Westmoreland, eds Translated, edited, and Philosophy, Feminism, with an introduction by and Postcolonial Theory John Marshall’s Peter Carravetta Namita Goswami Constitutionalism Clyde H.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing with Dr. Timnit Gebru — #Isupporttimnit #Believeblackwomen
    Google Walkout For Real Change 810 Followers · About Follow Sign in Get started Standing with Dr. Timnit Gebru — #ISupportTimnit #BelieveBlackWomen Google Walkout For Real Change 2 days ago · 83 min read We, the undersigned, stand in solidarity with Dr. Timnit Gebru, who was terminated from her position as Sta Research Scientist and Co-Lead of Ethical Articial Intelligence (AI) team at Google, following unprecedented research censorship. We call on Google Research to strengthen its commitment to research integrity and to unequivocally commit to supporting research that honors the commitments made in Google’s AI Principles. Until December 2, 2020, Dr. Gebru was one of very few Black women Research Scientists at the company, which boasts a dismal 1.6% Black women employees overall. Her research accomplishments are extensive, and have profoundly impacted academic scholarship and public policy. Dr. Gebru is a pathbreaking scientist doing some of the most important work to ensure just and accountable AI and to create a welcoming and diverse AI research Deld. Instead of being embraced by Google as an exceptionally talented and prolic contributor, Dr. Gebru has faced defensiveness, racism, gaslighting, research censorship, and now a retaliatory Dring. In an email to Dr. Gebru’s team on the evening of December 2, 2020, Google executives claimed that she had chosen to resign. This is false. In their direct correspondence with Dr. Gebru, these executives informed her that her termination was immediate, and pointed to an email she sent to a Google Brain diversity and inclusion mailing list as pretext. The contents of this email are important.
    [Show full text]
  • Computers Can't Get Wet: Queer Slippage and Play in the Rhetoric Of
    Title Page Computers Can’t Get Wet: Queer Slippage and Play in the Rhetoric of Computational Structure by Sandra L. Nelson B.A. English Literature, St. John’s University, 2013 M.A. English Rhetoric and Composition, University of Pittsburgh, 2017 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2020 Committee Page UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Sandra L. Nelson It was defended on March 31, 2020 and approved by Peter Campbell, Assistant Professor, Department of English Benjamin Miller, Assistant Professor, Department of English Alison Langmead, Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences Thesis Advisor/Dissertation Director: Annette Vee, Associate Professor, Department of English ii Copyright © by Sandra L. Nelson 2020 iii Abstract Computers Can’t Get Wet: Queer Slippage and Play in the Rhetoric of Computational Structure Sandra L. Nelson, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2020 This dissertation takes up the argument that computers are rhetorical structures that can be queered. Using cross-disciplinary methods, it examines the interplay that occurs between the layers of the computational stack – focusing in particular on the slippage between materiality, code, interface, and the resulting software – and analyzes the narratives that each layer perpetuates individually and in tandem. It applies a multi-faceted approach to queer theory in order to reveal the ways in which anti-normative computer users critique, resist, and subvert these narratives. When computers are approached as always already queer, the possibilities for disruption that exist within their limits materialize and present themselves as opportunities for intersectional exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Harnessing the Computational and Social Sciences to Solve Critical Societal Problems
    INTRODUCTION Harnessing the Computational and Social Sciences to Solve Critical Societal Problems Elizabeth Mynatt (Georgia Tech, co-chair) Duncan Watts (University of Pennsylvania, co-chair) Nadya Bliss (Arizona State University) Alondra Nelson (Social Science Research Council & Institute for Advanced Study) Willie Pearson (Georgia Tech) Rob Rutenbar (University of Pittsburgh) INTRODUCTION The NSF CISE Advisory Committee strongly researchers across the breadth of the CISE and endorses the findings from the round table report SBE communities, and highlighted a range of joint entitled “Harnessing the Computational and Social research themes and cross-cutting challenges. This Sciences to Solve Critical Societal Problems,” round table report captures and crystalizes these co-chaired by Elizabeth Mynatt (Georgia Institute themes and challenges. A follow-on joint meeting of Technology, CISE Advisory Committee member) of the CISE and SBE Advisory Committees in and Duncan Watts (University of Pennsylvania, SBE December 2020 confirmed the high level of ongoing Advisory Committee member) and funded jointly interest in joint collaboration on these important by CISE and SBE. Starting from a first-ever joint research topics. meeting of both CISE and SBE Advisory Committees in late 2019, a joint round table meeting (held Magdalena Balazinska and Rob Rutenbar, virtually in May 2020 due to COVID), brought CISE Advisory Committee co-chairs, together a vibrant and diverse community of on behalf of the CISE Advisory Committee INTRODUCTION CONTENTS PAGE 4 BACKGROUND 6 ROUNDTABLE OVERVIEW 10 MAJOR THEMES SPANNING ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIONS 15 OPPORTUNITIES 17 FUTURE STEPS 19 APPENDICES 24 BIBLIOGRAPHY INTRODUCTION 1.0 BACKGROUND It is increasingly apparent that many of the systems on which our society depends for its health, prosperity, and security are neither purely social nor purely computational ones.
    [Show full text]