Arizona State Rail Plan ~ Draft

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arizona State Rail Plan ~ Draft Acknowledgements The State Rail Plan was made possible by the cooperative efforts of the following individuals and organizations who contributed significantly to the successful completion of the project: Rail Technical Advisory Team Maria Hyatt, City of Phoenix Chris Watson, Arizona Corporation Commission David Barry, Swift Transportation Reuben Teran, Arizona Game and Fish Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Department Bonnie Allin, Tucson Airport Authority David Jacobs, Arizona State Historic Zoe Richmond, Union Pacific Railroad Preservation Office Jane Morris, City of Phoenix – Sky Harbor Gordon Taylor, Arizona State Land Department Airport Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Patrick Loftus, TTX Company Angela Mogel, Bureau of Land Management Jack Tomasik, Central Arizona Association of ADOT Project Team Governments Paul Johnson, City of Yuma Sara Allred, Project Manager Jermaine Hannon, Federal Highway Kristen Keener Busby, Sustainability Program Administration Manager Katai Nakosha, Governor’s Office John Halikowski, Director James Chessum, Greater Yuma Port Authority John McGee, Executive Director for Planning Kevin Wallace, Maricopa Association of and Policy Governments Mike Normand, Director of Transit Programs Marc Pearsall, Maricopa Association of Shannon Scutari, Esq. Director, Rail & Governments Sustainability Services Gabe Thum, Pima Association of Governments Jennifer Toth, Director, Multi-Modal Planning Robert Bohannan, RH Bohannan & Associates Division Jay Smyth, Southwest Rail Corridor Coalition Robert Travis, State Railroad Liaison Zoe Richmond, Union Pacific Railroad Jim Zumpf, Assistant Director, Systems Planning Carol Ketcherside, Valley Metro Rail and Programming Serena Unrein, Arizona Public Interest Research Group Consultant Project Team Peggy Fiandaca, Partners for Strategic Action Freight and Rail Advisory Council Mike Kies, AECOM Project Manager John McNamara, AECOM Tim Strow, Maricopa Association of Jackie Pfeiffer, AECOM Governments Vijayant Rajvanshi, AECOM Tim Terkelsen, Arizona Common Sense Ethan Rauch, AECOM Dave Mansheim, Bard Date Company A special thank you to all of the Metropolitan Planning Organizations and Council of Governments who helped organize and host the Focus Group Meetings. The project team also appreciates everyone who took time from their busy schedules to participate in the Focus Group discussions, and provided comments on the draft documents throughout the development of this plan. i FOREWORD The Arizona State Rail Plan is one piece of a larger multimodal planning framework for the State of Arizona. This document presents a series of issues and opportunities relative to the future of rail development in Arizona, including a series of implementation directions and a discussion on funding options. The technical work to support this document can be found in the Statewide Rail Framework Study, part of a broader 40-year multimodal transportation vision for Arizona. This planning process has spanned the last three years, included intense interagency and public involvement efforts, and was recently accepted by the State Transportation Board as part of the Statewide Transportation Planning Framework Program. Additional information and technical reports can be found at: http://www.bqaz.gov0H0H0H ii Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Arizona Rail Plan ..................................................................................... 2 1.2 History of Railroads in Arizona ........................................................................................ 2 2.0 Arizona Rail Vision, Goals and Objectives ............................................................................... 4 2.1 A Vision of Rail Transportation in 2030 ........................................................................... 4 2.2 Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Benefits of Rail for Arizona ............................................................................................. 6 2.3.1 Congestion Mitigation........................................................................................ 6 2.3.2 Economic Benefit ............................................................................................... 7 2.3.3 Air Quality.......................................................................................................... 8 2.3.4 Land Use ............................................................................................................ 8 2.3.5 Sustainability ..................................................................................................... 9 2.3.6 Energy Consumption .......................................................................................... 9 2.4 Existing and Potential Rail Traffic .................................................................................. 10 2.4.1 Commodity Flows ............................................................................................ 10 2.4.2 Freight Demand (2030 & 2050) ........................................................................ 11 2.4.3 Passenger Demand .......................................................................................... 14 2.5 Positive Train Control ................................................................................................... 18 2.6 Purpose and Background of the State Rail Plan ............................................................. 19 2.7 Compliance with United States Code, Section 22102 .................................................... 20 2.8 Updates to this Rail Plan ............................................................................................... 20 3.0 ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES ................................................................................................ 21 3.1 Passenger Rail System Issues and Opportunities ........................................................... 21 3.1.1 Intercity Passenger Rail System ........................................................................ 23 3.1.2 Southwest U.S. High-Speed Rail Network (HSR) ................................................ 31 3.1.3 Commuter Rail ................................................................................................. 34 3.1.4 Tourist Railroads .............................................................................................. 36 3.2 Rail System Network Issues and Opportunities ............................................................. 38 3.2.1 Transcontinental Rail Congestion ..................................................................... 38 3.2.2 Freight Rail Distribution Systems ...................................................................... 40 3.2.3 Intermodal and Freight Logistic Centers ........................................................... 44 3.2.4 Class I Branch Lines and Short Line Railroads .................................................... 47 iii 3.2.5 Rail Corridor Preservation ................................................................................ 51 3.2.6 New Railroad System Development ................................................................. 53 3.3 Safety and Congestion Mitigation Issues and Opportunities.......................................... 57 3.3.1 Public Rail Grade Crossing Improvements ........................................................ 57 3.3.2 Wildlife Corridors ............................................................................................. 60 4.0 PROPOSED RAIL PROJECTS .................................................................................................... 66 4.1 Recommended Actions ................................................................................................. 66 4.2 Arizona Spine Corridor.................................................................................................. 68 4.2.1 Inventory of Existing Conditions ....................................................................... 69 4.2.2 Corridor Strategy ............................................................................................. 74 4.2.3 Passenger Rail Opportunities for the Arizona Spine .......................................... 75 4.2.4 Freight Network Opportunities for the Arizona Spine ....................................... 80 4.2.5 Recommended Actions for the Arizona Spine Corridor ..................................... 82 4.2.6 Implementation ............................................................................................... 84 4.3 CANAMEX Corridor....................................................................................................... 86 4.3.1 Inventory of Existing Conditions ....................................................................... 88 4.3.2 Corridor Strategy ............................................................................................. 89 4.3.3 Recommended Rail Actions for the Canamex Corridor ..................................... 95 4.3.4 Implementation ............................................................................................... 97 4.4 Route 66 Corridor ....................................................................................................... 101 4.4.1 Inventory of Existing Conditions ..................................................................... 102 4.4.2 Corridor Strategy
Recommended publications
  • Clarkdale Transportation Study 2011 02 17 Final Report I Final Report February 2011
    CCllaarrkkddaallee TTrraannssppoorrttaattiioonn SSttuuddyy ADOT MPD Task Assignment 15-10 PGTD 0440 Contract # T08-49-U0001 Final Report Prepared by: Prepared for: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TOWN OF CLARKDALE February 2011 091374034 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 6 1.1 Study Objectives ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 Study Area .................................................................................................. 8 2 CURRENT AND FUTURE TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS ..... 10 2.1 Summary of Completed Plans and Studies in the Clarkdale Area ............... 10 2.2 Summary of Stakeholder Interviews .......................................................... 11 2.3 Land Use ................................................................................................... 14 2.3.1 Current Land Use ............................................................................ 14 2.3.2 In-Progress Developments ................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Future Land Use ............................................................................. 17 2.3.4 Demographics and Socioeconomics ........................................................ 21 2.3.5 Housing and Employment Density ........................................................ 21 2.3.6 Current demographics
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011
    Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements The State Rail Plan was made possible by the cooperative efforts of the following individuals and organizations who contributed significantly to the successful completion of the project: Rail Technical Advisory Team Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Chris Watson, Arizona Corporation Commission Bonnie Allin, Tucson Airport Authority Reuben Teran, Arizona Game and Fish Department Zoe Richmond, Union Pacific Railroad David Jacobs, Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Jane Morris, City of Phoenix – Sky Harbor Airport Gordon Taylor, Arizona State Land Department Patrick Loftus, TTX Company Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Angela Mogel, Bureau of Land Management ADOT Project Team Jack Tomasik, Central Arizona Association of Governments Sara Allred, Project Manager Paul Johnson, City of Yuma Kristen Keener Busby, Sustainability Program Manager Jermaine Hannon, Federal Highway Administration John Halikowski, Director Katai Nakosha, Governor’s Office John McGee, Executive Director for Planning and Policy James Chessum, Greater Yuma Port Authority Mike Normand, Director of Transit Programs Kevin Wallace, Maricopa Association of Governments Shannon Scutari, Esq. Director, Rail & Sustainability Marc Pearsall, Maricopa Association of Governments Services Gabe Thum, Pima Association of Governments Jennifer Toth, Director, Multi-Modal Planning Division Robert Bohannan, RH Bohannan & Associates Robert Travis, State Railroad Liaison Jay
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Multi-State Rail Planning Study Technical Background Report September 2014
    Southwest Multi-State Rail Planning Study Technical Background Report September 2014 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 What is a Multi-State Rail Plan? ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Why the Southwest?.................................................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Geographic Scope of Study ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.5 Study Stakeholders .................................................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Guiding Principles for Southwest Multi-State Rail Network Planning ..................................................... 11 Chapter 2. Planning Context ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Overview of the Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Population and Travel Demand ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Rail Safety and Security Guide
    State of Arizona Rail Safety & Security Resource Guide November 2007 Disclaimer This guide is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be an all-inclusive resource. The guide is a compilation of information from many sources and entities. The information contained herein is subject to amendment and change without notice and therefore the accuracy of the contents cannot be guaranteed. Readers are cautioned not to rely solely on the guide and should do further research to ensure accuracy of the information. Legal advice should be sought as appropriate. i Acknowledgement of Participants Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Arizona Operation Lifesaver (AZOL) BNSF Railway (BNSF) Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Federal Railroad Administration (FRA-USDOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA-USDOT) Federal Motors Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Governor’s Office of Highway Safety (GOHS) METRO (Light Rail) Transportation Safety Administration (TSA-DHS) Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) ii Preface This plan will focus on targeted areas of railroad safety with emphasis on data driven, state specific needs identified by the “USDOT Highway-Rail Crossing Safety and Trespass Prevention Action Plan” developed by the United States Department of Transportation. Initially, the plan was developed to help guide efforts by federal and state governments, rail industry and public rail safety organizations to reduce train- vehicle collisions and trespass incidents. While the action plan does highlight specific programs and activities, it is intended to provide flexibility to the railroads, highways, public transit and communities in responding effectively to real world conditions. The action plan emphasizes a multi-modal approach for improving safety at the nation’s 277,722 highway-rail crossings, and preventing trespassing along more than 145,000 miles of track and right of way.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Verde Mining District, Jerome, Arizona
    History of the Verde Mining District, Jerome, Arizona David F. Briggs Geologist March 2018 CONTRIBUTED REPORT CR-18-D Arizona Geological Survey azgs.arizona.edu | repository.azgs.az.gov Arizona Geological Survey Phil A. Pearthree, Director Manuscript approved for publication in March 2018 Printed by the Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved For an electronic copy of this publication: www.repository.azgs.az.gov For information on the mission, objectives or geologic products of the Arizona Geological Survey visit azgs.arizona.edu This publication was prepared by a department of the University of Arizona. The Univer- sity of Arizona, or any department thereof, or any of their employees, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the University of Arizona Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Report series provides non-AZGS authors with a forum for publishing documents concerning Arizona geology. While review comments may have been incorpo- rated, this document does not necessarily conform to AZGS technical, editorial, or policy standards. The Arizona Geological Survey issues no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the suitability of this product for a particular use. Moreover, the Arizona Geological Survey shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. The author(s) is solely responsible for the data and ideas expressed herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …
    Freight Railroads in Arizona Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................11 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................1,759 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................2,837 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$126,970 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................9,700 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$245 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 7.3 million additional trucks to handle the 131.6 million tons of freight that moved by rail in Arizona in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 3.1 million Total Carloads: 65,100 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Metallic Ores 0.6 6,900 Intermodal 0.5 37,300 Glass and Stone 0.4 4,200
    [Show full text]
  • Part 225 Reporting Railroads.Pdf
    Part 225 Reporting Railroads Total Records: 771 Report Created on: 4/30/2019 Notes: A railroad may be represented in multiple regions of the country. Region Railroad Reporting Railroad Name Code 1 ADCX Adirondack Scenic Railroad 1 APRR Albany Port Railroad 1 ARA Arcade & Attica Railroad Corporation 1 ARDJ American Rail Dispatching Center 1 BCRY BERKSHIRE SCENIC RAILWAY MUSEUM, INC. 1 BDRV BELVEDERE & DELAWARE RIVER RWY 1 BHR Brookhaven Rail, LLC 1 BHX B&H Rail Corp 1 BKRR Batten Kill Railroad 1 BSOR BUFFALO SOUTHERN RAILROAD, INC. 1 CDOT Connecticut Department Of Transportation 1 CLP Clarendon & Pittsford Railroad Company 1 CMQX CENTRAL MAINE & QUEBEC RAILWAY 1 CMRR Catskill Mountain Railroad 1 CMSX Cape May Seashore Lines, Inc. 1 CNYK Central New York Railroad Corporation 1 COGN COGN Railroad 1 CONW Conway Scenic Railroad 1 CRSH Consolidated Rail Corporation 1 CSO CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN RAILROAD INC. 1 DESR Downeast Scenic Railroad 1 DL DELAWARE LACKAWANNA RAILROAD 1 DLWR DEPEW, LANCASTER & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. 1 DRRV Dover and Rockaway River Railroad 1 DURR Delaware & Ulster Rail Ride 1 EBSR East Brookfield & Spencer Railroad LLC 1 EJR East Jersey Railroad & Terminal Company 1 EMRY EASTERN MAINE RAILROAD COMPANY 1 FGLK Finger Lakes Railway Corporation 1 FRR FALLS ROAD RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. 1 FRVT Fore River Transportation Corporation 1 GMRC Green Mountain Railroad Corporation 1 GRS Pan Am Railways/Guilford System 1 GU GRAFTON & UPTON RAILROAD COMPANY 1 HRRC HOUSATONIC RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. 1 LAL Livonia, Avon & Lakeville Railroad Corporation 1 LBR Lowville & Beaver River Railroad Company 1 LI Long Island Rail Road 1 LRWY LEHIGH RAILWAY 1 LSX LUZERNE & SUSQUEHANNA RAILWAY 1 MBRX Milford-Bennington Railroad Company 1 MBTA Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority 1 MCER MASSACHUSETTS CENTRAL RAILROAD CORPORATION 1 MCRL MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL RAILROAD, LLC 1 ME MORRISTOWN & ERIE RAILWAY, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Employment by State, Class of Employer and Last Railroad Employer Calendar Year 2013
    Statistical Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Bureau of the Actuary www.rrb.gov No. 2 - 2015 March 2015 Total Employment by State, Class of Employer and Last Railroad Employer Calendar Year 2013 The attached table shows total employment by State, class of employer and last railroad employer in the year. Total employment includes all employees covered by the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts who worked at least one day during calendar year 2013. For employees shown under Unknown for State, either no address is on file (2.0 percent of all employees) or the employee has a foreign address such as Canada (0.2 percent). TOTAL EMPLOYMENT BY STATE, CLASS OF EMPLOYER AND LAST RAILROAD EMPLOYER CALENDAR YEAR 2013 CLASS OF 1 STATE EMPLOYER RAILROAD EMPLOYER NUMBER Unknown 1 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 1,803 Unknown 1 CSX TRANSPORTATION INC 1,889 Unknown 1 DAKOTA MINNESOTA & EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION 2 Unknown 1 ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR CO 12 Unknown 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP (AMTRAK) 532 Unknown 1 NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 12 Unknown 1 SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY 3 Unknown 1 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 2 Unknown 2 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY 152 Unknown 2 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, LLC 47 Unknown 2 IOWA INTERSTATE RAILROAD LTD 44 Unknown 2 MONTANA RAIL LINK INC 1 Unknown 2 SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RY CO VERMONT 21 Unknown 3 ARCELORMITTAL CLEVELAND WORKS RAILWAY, INC 9 Unknown 3 ARCELORMITTAL SOUTH CHICAGO & INDIANA HARBOR RAILWAY, INC 4 Unknown 3 BELT RAILWAY COMPANY OF CHICAGO 8 Unknown 3 BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORTATION 7 Unknown 3 CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY INC - NOYES DIVISION 438 Unknown 3 CHICAGO TERMINAL RAILROAD COMPANY 34 Unknown 3 CLOQUET TERMINAL RAILROAD COMPANY INC 10 Unknown 3 COAST BELLE RAIL, LLC 4 Unknown 3 COLORADO AND WYOMING RAILWAY COMPANY 8 Unknown 3 CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION 1 Unknown 3 COPPER BASIN RY INC 6 Unknown 3 DAKOTA MISSOURI VALLEY & WESTERN RR INC 6 Unknown 3 DELTA SOUTHERN RAILROAD, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State Rail Plan Update Draft Plan
    ARIZONA STATE RAIL PLAN UPDATE DRAFT PLAN FEBRUARY 2021 Arizona State Rail Plan Draft Executive Summary February 2021 Executive Summary INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Arizona State Rail Plan (SRP) is to guide the advancement of the state’s rail system. The SRP provides a current assessment of the rail system and serves as a practical roadmap for future rail investment and policies in Arizona. The SRP is structured as follows. Chapter/Title Description of Content Executive Summary 1. The Role of Describes the role of rail within the State’s Rail in transportation system and how Arizona Statewide state and local government entities are Transportation organized to support rail development. 2. The State’s Describes the Arizona rail system, its Existing Rail current condition, and environmental and System economic impacts on the State. Identifies past and future trends that have impacted or will impact the Arizona rail system. 3. Proposed Identifies passenger rail service needs and Passenger Rail opportunities. Describes improvements and Improvements investments that have been put forward to and address passenger rail service needs and Investments opportunities. 4. Proposed Identifies freight rail service needs and Freight Rail opportunities. Describes improvements and Improvements investments that have been put forward to and address freight rail service needs and Investments opportunities. 5. The State’s Presents ADOT’s vision for railroad Rail Service transportation, projects and strategies to and meet that vision, summary of impacts that Investment would result from the projects and Program strategies, and a discussion of probable financing scenarios. 6. Coordination Descriptions of outreach and coordination and Review efforts in developing the SRP.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroads of Arizona (2002) Includes Abandoned Lines & Historical Line Surveys
    Railroads of Arizona (2002) Includes Abandoned Lines & Historical Line Surveys Black Mesa Mine Loadout Mead Lake Las Vegas Generating Black Mesa Mine Station Boulder City P&M Mine Searchlight Peach Springs Chloride Seligman Darling / Winona Ash Fork Coronado Jct. Camp Navajo Clarkdale Proposed Fence Lake Mine Skull Extension Lake Mary Valley SRP/BNSF (2005) Mayer Snowflake Poland Coronado Rice Tepco 1910-1915 Mogollon Rim Congress Crown King Prescott & Phoenix Swansea Shortline Railroad / SPRR Survey McNary Springerville 1895-1905 Black Canyon Arizona Mineral City Belt Railroad White Mountain Survey Scenic Railroad Aguila Roosevelt Lake 1964-1976 Glendale Blythe Palo Verde NGS Inspiration Mine Mesa Ripley Buckeye Superior Globe Ray Mine 1920-1923 Out Of Service Southern Pacific Hayden Morenci Mine Since 1997 Survey 1880 Maricopa Coolidge Southern Pacific Roll Survey Duncan 1905 – 1915 EP&SW Survey 1880 San Southern Manuel Pacific Survey Bowie New Cornelia Mine Patagonia (ROCKY POINT) Bisbee 2002 Naco Map by Marc Pearsall – 2002 – Use Permission Granted Railroads of Arizona (2002) LEGEND: Includes Abandoned Lines & Historical Line Surveys Compiled by Marc Pearsall ± 2002 - Use Permission Granted Union Pacific Railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Arizona & California Railroad (Rail America Corp) Arizona Eastern Railroad (Rail America Corp) Grand Canyon Railway San Pedro & Southwestern Railroad (Rail America Corp) Copper Basin Railway (Rail Management Corp) Black Mesa & Lake Powell Railroad (Navajo Nation / Salt River Project)
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Lumbering in Arizona Before World War II
    The history of lumbering in Arizona before World War II Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Matheny, Robert Lavesco, 1933- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 12:59:26 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565344 THE HISTORY OF LUMBERING IN ARIZONA BEFORE WORLD WAR II by Robert Lavesco Matheny A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 5 Copyright 1975 Robert Lavesco Matheny THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by ____________ Robert Lavesco Matheny_________________ entitled _________ The History of Lumbering in Arizona___________ _________________ before World War II___________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of ________________ Doctor of Philosophy__________________ . Xic, Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination.
    [Show full text]
  • General Code of Operating Rules (GCOR)
    GCORGeneral Code of Operating Rules Seventh Edition Effective April 1, 2015 These rules herein govern the operations of the railroads listed and must be complied with by all employees regardless of gender whose duties are in any way affected thereby. They supersede all previous rules and instructions inconsistent therewith. © 2015 General Code of Operating Rules Committee, All Rights Reserved i-2 GCOR—Seventh Edition—April 1, 2015 Front cover photo by Geneva May Short BHP Nevada Railway Company B&H Rail Corp Adopted by: Birmingham Terminal Railroad Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad Aberdeen Carolina & Western Railway BNSF Railway Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Boise Valley Railroad Acadiana Railway Company Buffalo & Pittsburg Railroad Affton Terminal Railroad Burlington Junction Railway Ag Valley Railroad Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railroad Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway California Northern Railroad Alabama Southern Railroad California Western Railroad Alabama & Tennessee River Railway, LLC Camas Prairie RailNet, Inc. Alabama Warrior Railroad Canadian Pacific Alaska Railroad Corporation Caney Fork & Western Railroad Albany & Eastern Railroad Company Canon City and Royal Gorge Railroad Aliquippa & Ohio River Railroad Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Alliance Terminal Railway, LLC Carolina Piedmont Railroad Altamont Commuter Express Rail Authority Carrizo Gorge Railway Alton & Southern Railway Cascade and Columbia River Railroad Amtrak—Chicago Terminal Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Company Amtrak—Michigan Line Central California
    [Show full text]