Part 225 Reporting Railroads.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reporting Marks
Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR -
Normal Template 2016
APPENDIX E 2014 TEXAS STATEWIDE LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND 2008 THROUGH 2040 TREND INVENTORIES El Paso Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan State Implementation Plan Revision for the One-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Project Number 2018-029-SIP-NR Adoption April 24 2019 2014 Texas Statewide Locomotive Emissions Inventory and 2008 through 2040 Trend Inventories FINAL Prepared for: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Prepared by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. August 26, 2015 ERG No. 0345.00.003.005 2014 Texas Statewide Locomotive Emissions Inventory and 2008 through 2040 Trend Inventories TCEQ Contract No. 582-15-50416 Work Order No. 582-15-51538-02-FY2015-11 Prepared for: Cody McLain Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Emissions Assessment Section P. O. Box 13087 Bldg. E, Room 335 Austin, TX 78711-3087 Prepared by: Heather Perez Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 200 Morrisville, NC 27560 August 26, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Data Collection ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Union Pacific ........................................................................................... 2-3 2.2 Kansas City Southern .............................................................................. 2-3 2.3 Texas & Northern Railway ..................................................................... -
BIRMINGHAM REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN Presentation to MPO Committees for Adoption WHY DEVELOP the MPO’S FIRST REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN?
BIRMINGHAM REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN Presentation to MPO Committees for Adoption WHY DEVELOP THE MPO’S FIRST REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN? 2015 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) increased the focus on freight: It defines requirements for state freight plans Required States and MPOs to adopt freight performance measures and performance targets Established a new National Highway Freight Program that authorizes $1.1 to $1.5 billion annually for freight infrastructure improvements on the National Highway Freight Network WHY DEVELOP THE MPO’S FIRST REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN? 2017 Alabama Statewide Freight Plan has specific requirements that must be met in MPO freight plans The Plan will ensure freight system needs are included as we develop the 2045 Regional Transportation Plan PIEDMONT ATLANTIC MEGAREGION Birmingham is a core city within the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion which spans from central North Carolina to Alabama and western Tennessee including: Raleigh-Durham Greensboro--Winston-Salem--High Point Charlotte Greenville Atlanta Birmingham Nashville Memphis REGIONAL FREIGHT SYSTEM What makes up the freight and logistics system? NATIONAL HIGHWAY FREIGHT NETWORK In Birmingham, this includes I- 65, I-20, and I-459 Includes the following Intermodal Connectors: Burlington Northern RR Dixie Hub Center (Finley Ave.) Ernest Norris Railroad Yard (Irondale) Port of Birmingham Colonial Pipeline RAILROADS Class I Railroads include: BNSF Railway: 36 miles CSX: 223 miles Norfolk Southern Railway: 267 miles Class III Railroads -
Statewide Logistics Plan for North Carolina
Statewide Logistics Plan for North Carolina An Investigation of the Issues with Recommendations for Action APPENDICES By George F. List, Ph.D, P.E. P.I. and Head, Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Robert S. Foyle, P.E. Co-P.I. and Associate Director, ITRE North Carolina State University Henry Canipe Senior Manager TransTech Management, Inc. John Cameron, Ph.D. Managing Partner TransTech Management, Inc. Erik Stromberg Ports and Harbors Practice Leader Hatch, Mott, MacDonald LLC For the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management May 13, 2008 Appendices Appendix A: Powerpoint Slide Sets Presentations include: Tompkins Associates North Carolina Statewide Logistics Proposal North Carolina Statewide Logistics Plan Cambridge Systematics Freight Demand and Logistics – Trends and Issues Highway Freight Transportation – Trends and Issues Rail Freight Transportation – Trends and Issues Waterborne Freight Transportation – Trends and Issues State DOTs and Freight – Trends and Issues Virginia Statewide Multimodal Freight Study - Phase I Overview Global Insight Shifts in Global Trade Patterns – Meaning for North Carolina 5/5/2008 North Carolina Statewide Logistics Proposal Presented to: North Carolina State University Project Team Charlotte, NC March 13, 2008 Caveat… This presentation and discussion is from the Shipper’s perspective… ASSO C I ATES CONFIDENTIAL — Use or disclosure of this information is restricted. 2 1 5/5/2008 North American Port Report (1/08) A majority of the Supply Chain Consortium respondents to the North American Port Report survey believe that their supply chain network is not optimal with respect to the ports used for their ocean freight. Significant opportunities exist from getting all aspects of the supply chain aligned to optimizing costs and customer service. -
CP's North American Rail
2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR -
Freight Car Line Companies 12-13 North Carolina Department of Revenue
IA-336 Web Freight Car Line Companies 12-13 North Carolina Department of Revenue Application Beginning Ending DOR Use Only for Period (MM-DD-YY) (MM-DD-YY) Legal Name (First 35 Characters) (USE CAPITAL LETTERS FOR YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS) Trade Name Federal Employer ID Number Mailing Address City State Zip Code Fill in applicable circles: Name of Contact Person State of Domicile Amended Return Corporation is a first-time filer in N.C. Phone Number Fax Number Address has changes since prior year Part 1. Computation of Gross Earnings Taxes In Lieu of Ad Valorem Taxes 1. Total Revenue from the Operation of Freight Cars Within North Carolina 1. (From Part 2, Page 2) , , .00 2. Tax Due 2. Multiply Line 1 by 3% , , .00 3. Penalty (10% for late payment; 5% per month, maximum 25%, for late filing) 3. Multiply Line 2 by rate above if return with full payment is not filed timely. , .00 4. Interest (See the Department’s website, www.dornc.com, for current interest rate.) 4. Multiply Line 2 by applicable rate if return with full payment is not filed timely. , .00 5. Total Due 5. Add Lines 2 through 4 $ , , .00 Signature: Title: Date: I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, this return is accurate and complete. Signature of Preparer Preparer’s other than Taxpayer: FEIN, SSN, or PTIN: This return is used to report gross earnings from the operation of freight cars within North Carolina by a person operating cars, furnishing cars, or leasing cars for the transportation of freight in North Carolina. -
Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
Railroad Industry Modal Profile An Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities October 2011 Version: Release_v3.0 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/20 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Government. Reference to any specific programs does not constitute official Federal Government endorsement or approval of the programs, the views they express, or the services they offer. TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Overview of the Railroad Industry ....................................................................................... 7 2. Current Railroad Workforce ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Total Estimated Railroad Workforce ............................................................................11 2.1.1 Class I Freight Railroad Companies .....................................................................12 2.1.2 Class I Passenger Railroad: Amtrak ...................................................................13 2.1.3 Regional and Short Line Railroad Companies......................................................14 2.1.4 Manufacturers and Suppliers ...............................................................................14 2.1.5 Union Representation ..........................................................................................14 2.1.6 Major Associations ...............................................................................................14 -
OHIO RAILROADS EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST Source – Ohio Rail Development Commission (ORDC) Revised: 12/6/2017
OHIO RAILROADS EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST Source – Ohio Rail Development Commission (ORDC) Revised: 12/6/2017 Sample emergency notification sign. Look for the emergency phone number and crossing identification number at each crossing. HIGHLIGHTED NUMBERS – CLASS 1 REGIONAL OR LARGER SHORTLINE RAILROADS CODE RAILROAD NUMBER AA Ann Arbor Railroad (419) 726-3237 AB Akron Barberton Cluster Railway Company (330) 697-0857 ACJR Ashtabula, Caron & Jefferson Railroad (440) 576-1212 ASRY Ashland Railway, Dispatch (419) 522-0110 ATK Amtrak (800) 331-0008 BSS Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad (724) 589-4175 CCRA Camp Chase Railroad Company (888) 504-6599 CN Canadian National (800) 465-9239 CMQR Central Maine & Quebec Railway (866) 311-6851 CCRL Cleveland Commercial Railroad (800) 727-9252 CFE Chicago, Ft. Wayne (800) 979-4958 CIND Central Railroad of Indiana (800) 979-4958 CSX CSX Transportation (800) 232-0144 (Option 4) CTER Cincinnati East Terminal Railway (800) 979-4958 CUOH Columbus & Ohio River Railroad (800) 733-0026 CVSX Cuyahoga Valley Scenic Railroad (440) 546-5945 CWRO Cleveland Works Railway (216) 429-6572 FIR Flats Industrial Railroad Company (216) 696-7951 GTR Germantown Rail Siding Co. (The Dupps Co) (937) 855-6555 G&W Genesee & Wyoming Inc. (See Ohio Central Railroad) GTW CN North America/Grand Trunk Western Railroad (800) 465-9239 GRRW Grand River Railway (330) 718-3727 (412) 417-0733 HVSR Hocking Valley Scenic Railroad (740) 249-1452 1 CODE RAILROAD NUMBER IE Indiana Eastern Railroad (877) 788-0629 IN Indiana Northeastern Railway Company (517) 398-0005 (517) 278-4614 INOH Indiana & Ohio Railroad (800) 979-4958 IOCR Indiana & Ohio Central Railroad (800) 979-4958 IORY Indiana & Ohio Railway (800) 979-4958 MVRY Mahoning Valley Railway (800) 733-0026 ND&W Napoleon, Defiance & Western (479) 414 6563 MRTA Akron Metro RTA (330) 612-3016 (330) 957-0157 NSS Newburgh & South Shore Railroad (844) 564-8091 NOW Northern Ohio & Western Railway (844) 562-8091 NS Norfolk Southern Corporation (800) 453-2530 NTRY Republic N&T Railroad (330) 438-5466 OHCR Ohio Central Railroad, Inc. -
Clarkdale Transportation Study 2011 02 17 Final Report I Final Report February 2011
CCllaarrkkddaallee TTrraannssppoorrttaattiioonn SSttuuddyy ADOT MPD Task Assignment 15-10 PGTD 0440 Contract # T08-49-U0001 Final Report Prepared by: Prepared for: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TOWN OF CLARKDALE February 2011 091374034 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 6 1.1 Study Objectives ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 Study Area .................................................................................................. 8 2 CURRENT AND FUTURE TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS ..... 10 2.1 Summary of Completed Plans and Studies in the Clarkdale Area ............... 10 2.2 Summary of Stakeholder Interviews .......................................................... 11 2.3 Land Use ................................................................................................... 14 2.3.1 Current Land Use ............................................................................ 14 2.3.2 In-Progress Developments ................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Future Land Use ............................................................................. 17 2.3.4 Demographics and Socioeconomics ........................................................ 21 2.3.5 Housing and Employment Density ........................................................ 21 2.3.6 Current demographics -
Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011
Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements The State Rail Plan was made possible by the cooperative efforts of the following individuals and organizations who contributed significantly to the successful completion of the project: Rail Technical Advisory Team Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Chris Watson, Arizona Corporation Commission Bonnie Allin, Tucson Airport Authority Reuben Teran, Arizona Game and Fish Department Zoe Richmond, Union Pacific Railroad David Jacobs, Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Jane Morris, City of Phoenix – Sky Harbor Airport Gordon Taylor, Arizona State Land Department Patrick Loftus, TTX Company Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Angela Mogel, Bureau of Land Management ADOT Project Team Jack Tomasik, Central Arizona Association of Governments Sara Allred, Project Manager Paul Johnson, City of Yuma Kristen Keener Busby, Sustainability Program Manager Jermaine Hannon, Federal Highway Administration John Halikowski, Director Katai Nakosha, Governor’s Office John McGee, Executive Director for Planning and Policy James Chessum, Greater Yuma Port Authority Mike Normand, Director of Transit Programs Kevin Wallace, Maricopa Association of Governments Shannon Scutari, Esq. Director, Rail & Sustainability Marc Pearsall, Maricopa Association of Governments Services Gabe Thum, Pima Association of Governments Jennifer Toth, Director, Multi-Modal Planning Division Robert Bohannan, RH Bohannan & Associates Robert Travis, State Railroad Liaison Jay -
Southwest Multi-State Rail Planning Study Technical Background Report September 2014
Southwest Multi-State Rail Planning Study Technical Background Report September 2014 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 What is a Multi-State Rail Plan? ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Why the Southwest?.................................................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Geographic Scope of Study ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.5 Study Stakeholders .................................................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Guiding Principles for Southwest Multi-State Rail Network Planning ..................................................... 11 Chapter 2. Planning Context ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Overview of the Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Population and Travel Demand .............................................................................................................. -
New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)
NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) JUNE 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 COMMON GOALS AND THEMES................................................................................................... 2 2.1 | Goals Identification ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 | Theme Identification ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 | Gap Identification......................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Geographic Coverage......................................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Modal Coverage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Gaps in Coordination ......................................................................................................................................................