BIRMINGHAM REGIONAL
FREIGHT PLAN
Presentation to MPO Committees for Adoption
WHY DEVELOP THE MPO’S FIRST REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN?
2015 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) increased the focus on freight:
It defines requirements for state freight plans Required States and MPOs to adopt freight performance measures and performance targets Established a new National Highway Freight Program that authorizes $1.1 to $1.5 billion annually for freight infrastructure improvements on the National Highway Freight Network
WHY DEVELOP THE MPO’S FIRST REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN?
2017 Alabama Statewide Freight Plan has specific requirements that must
be met in MPO freight plans The Plan will ensure freight system needs are included as we develop the
2045 Regional Transportation Plan
PIEDMONT ATLANTIC
MEGAREGION
Birmingham is a core city within the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion which spans from central North Carolina to Alabama and western Tennessee including:
Raleigh-Durham Greensboro--Winston-Salem--High Point Charlotte Greenville Atlanta Birmingham Nashville Memphis
REGIONAL FREIGHT
SYSTEM
What makes up the freight and logistics system?
NATIONAL HIGHWAY
FREIGHT NETWORK
In Birmingham, this includes I-
65, I-20, and I-459
Includes the following
Intermodal Connectors:
Burlington Northern RR Dixie Hub
Center (Finley Ave.)
Ernest Norris Railroad Yard (Irondale) Port of Birmingham Colonial Pipeline
RAILROADS
Class I Railroads include:
BNSF Railway: 36 miles CSX: 223 miles Norfolk Southern Railway: 267 miles
Class III Railroads include:
Alabama Warrior Railway: 7 miles Alabama and Tennessee River Railway:
29 miles
Birmingham Terminal Railway: 37 miles
Birmingham is one of the few gateway cities where the major east and west railroads interchange
WATERWAYS AND
PORT BIRMINGHAM
Port Birmingham consists of 184 acres with a half mile of frontage on the Black Warrior River
BHM
Airport
BIRMINGHAM AND
BESSEMER AIRPORTS
Birmingham-Shuttlesworth
International Airport is the largest and busiest airport in Alabama by passenger volume, and ranks 97th in cargo operations
12,000 and 7,000 ft runways
Bessemer Municipal Airport
(EKY) is classified as a reliever airport with a 6,000 ft runway
Bessemer Municipal
Airport
FOREIGN TRADE ZONE
No. 98
Birmingham is home to FTZ No. 98, includes subzones:
98A Mercedes-Benz 98B ZJ Industries 98C JVC America 98D NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc.
Locations within Birmingham are:
Acipco – 314 acres Airport Air Cargo – 50.5 acres Airport CBI – 33.2 acres Airport North/Northeast – 442 acres Airport West – 24.8 acres CSX Railroad – 100 acres Munger – 96.35 acres Oxmoor Valley/USX – 705 acres Oxmoor Industrial Park – 28.8 acres Pizitz/McRae’s Warehouse – 13.9 acres
Colonial Pipeline Company is one of many private companies serving the Birmingham region
OTHER FREIGHT
SYSTEM
COMPONENTS
Gas pipelines Industrial parks Warehouses Distribution centers Trucking companies Manufacturers
TOP COMMODITIES MOVING ON
THE REGIONAL FREIGHT SYSTEM (2015)
All Others
26%
Waste/scrap
3%
3% 4% 4%
Articles-base metal
Other foodstuffs
Motorized vehicles
Wood prods.
5%
6%
Base metals
Nonmetal min. prods.
Gravel
7%
10%
Coal-n.e.c.
12%
Coal
20%
- 20%
- 0%
- 5%
- 10%
- 15%
- 25%
- 30%
COMMODITY FLOW ANALYSIS
Trading Partners - Inbound
More goods come into the region than leave it
These goods come from adjacent states, with some exceptions (Coal from Wyoming and metallic ores from Minnesota)
COMMODITY FLOW ANALYSIS
Trading Partners - Outbound
Commodities originating in the region typically do not travel far and very little is sent west
Largest receivers of this freight are Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, Mississippi, and Florida
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE FREIGHT INDUSTRY
Employment
Birmingham’s freight industry is a critical
Mining,
Agriculture, Forestry,
component to the regional economy:
Quarrying, and Oil & Gas Extraction -
4%
Fishing, and Hunting -
3%
Generates 91,000 freight jobs (15% of total jobs)
Transportation & Warehousing -
20%
$65K average salary (45% higher than non-freight
Manufacturing -
40%
related jobs)
Generates $30 billion in total economic output
(28% of the region’s total)
Wholesale Trade - 33%
Source: IMPLAN, 2014.
4 MEETINGS OF THE FREIGHT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Alabama Trucking Association Bessemer Airport Authority Birmingham Airport Authority Birmingham Business Alliance Birmingham Terminal Railway BNSF Railway Christie Strategy Group Church Transportation and Logistics City of Birmingham Economic Development CSX Industrial Development EBSCO Industries, Inc. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC Jefferson County Development Authority KAMTEK Norfolk Southern
25 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS WERE CONDUCTED
Alabama Trucking Association Bessemer Airport Authority Birmingham Airport Authority Birmingham Business Alliance Birmingham Terminal Railway BNSF Railway Christie Strategy Group Church Transportation and Logistics City of Birmingham Economic
Development
CSX Industrial Development EBSCO Industries, Inc. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC Jefferson County Development
Authority
Parker Towing Regional Traffic Management Center (TMC) Shelby County Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway Development
Authority
Transportation and Logistical Services (TLS) UAB Planning Design and Construction Vulcan Materials Company Warrior Tom Bigbee Waterway Association Watco Alabama Port Services (Port Birmingham) Watkins Trucking Company
KAMTEK Norfolk Southern
FINALIZING THE ROADWAY NEEDS LIST
Developed list of projects based on site reviews and stakeholder input Reviewed 2045 Regional Transportation Plan projects
Eliminated projects underway or complete Eliminated projects in predominantly residential communities
Compared stakeholder list to existing project list and identified new projects that address identified needs
Developed project description and cost estimate for new projects
FINALIZING THE NEEDS LIST - AIRPORTS
Airports
Met with Birmingham-Shuttlesworth
International Airport to review project list provided in current Master Plan
Met with Bessemer Municipal Airport to review project list in their Capital Improvement Plan
Freight or freight friendly projects were identified, discussed, documented and included
FINALIZING THE NEEDS LIST – PORT BIRMINGHAM
Port Birmingham
Met with Port Birmingham and Watco to discuss needs
Freight projects (terminal, waterway, rail and roadway connections) were identified, discussed, documented and included
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION:
PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND WEIGHTS
All projects (from all modes of transportation) were run through a series of 10 performance measures and given a composite performance score
Equal weights were used for all performance measures
Performance Area
Economic Impacts
- Goals
- Objectives
Improve access to critical freight assets
Performance Measures
Does Project improve last-mile access to designated freight facility/asset?
Weight
10 10 10
Advance regional economic development through strategic freight investments
Does Project improve network connection?
Improve (intermodal)
connections on freight network Will project enhance capacity ?
Does project improve/create access to industrial centers (e.g., distribution center; warehouse; manufacturing facility) Does the project have benefits for other users?
Enhance freight related employment and development opportunities
10 10
External Impacts Identify opportunity to leverage freight investment for benefit of all
Freight as a good neighbor Improve safety for all freight system users
Does project improve safety?
10
Does project address a network segment
Reduce delay on freight network identified by stakeholders as a freight bottleneck?
10 10 10
Reduce costs for shippers, operators, and consumers
Will project reduce delay or improve reliability on a network segment?
Improve reliability and
Transportation reduce congestion of
Impacts
Will project improve the efficiency of existing/planned freight operations? Will project improve the condition of existing freight assets (rolling stock/vehicles, rail, freight network
Enhance travel time reliability Improve condition of the freight network roadway (pavement/bridge)?
10
- 100
- TOTAL Points
ADDITIONAL REFINEMENT FOR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Categorized as either “Fiscally Constrained” or
“Visionary” (unfunded) projects
Prioritization for roadway projects was further refined to reflect the cost-effectiveness of the potential investment
i.e High priority projects: highest performance achieved at the lowest relative cost
HIGH RANKED FISCALLY CONSTRAINED
ROADWAY PROJECTS
HIGH RANKED VISIONARY ROADWAY PROJECTS
HIGH RANKED BHM AIRPORT PROJECTS
HIGH RANKED BESSEMER MUNICPAL AIRPORT PROJECTS
PORT BIRMINGHAM PROJECTS
EXAMPLE OF RAILROAD NEEDS FROM STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
Resolve conflicts with roadways
(at-grade crossings, etc.)
Preserve rail-served industrial property for rail-served industrial use
Trucks routed through neighborhood
Note: Requests were sent to Class I railroads requesting documentation of needs; no needs were submitted
Congestion adjacent to interchanges
Lindsay Puckett, AICP
Principal Planner [email protected]
264-8421
Marshall Farmer
Senior GIS Analyst [email protected]
264-8421
THANK YOU!