Report on the Russian Federation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Russian Federation CRI (2001) 41 SECOND REPORT ON THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Adopted on 16 March 2001 Strasbourg, 13 November 2001 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) and about the other activities of the Council of Europe in this field, please contact: Secretariat of ECRI Directorate General of Human Rights – DG II Council of Europe F - 67075 STRASBOURG Cedex Tel.: +33 (0) 3 88 41 29 64 Fax: +33 (0) 3 88 41 39 87 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site : www.ecri.coe.int Foreword The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) is a body of the Council of Europe, composed of independent members. Its aim is to combat racism, xenophobia, antisemitism and intolerance at a pan-European level and from the angle of the protection of human rights. One of the pillars of ECRI’s work programme is its country-by-country approach, whereby it analyses the situation as regards racism and intolerance in each of the member States of the Council of Europe and makes suggestions and proposals as to how to tackle the problems identified. At the end of 1998, ECRI finished the first round of its country-by-country reports for all member States. ECRI’s first report on the Russian Federation is dated 19 June 1998 (published in January 1999). The second stage of the country-by-country work, initiated in January 1999, involves the preparation of a second report on each member State. The aim of these second reports is to follow-up the proposals made in the first reports, to update the information contained therein, and to provide a more in-depth analysis of certain issues of particular interest in the country in question. An important stage in ECRI’s country-by-country work is a process of confidential dialogue with the national authorities of the country in question before the final adoption of the report. A new procedure in the second round of country reports is the organisation of a contact visit for the ECRI rapporteurs prior to the drafting of the second report. The contact visit to the Russian Federation took place on 13-17 November 2000. During this visit, the rapporteurs met with representatives of various ministries and public administrations responsible for issues relating to ECRI’s mandate. ECRI warmly thanks the Russian national authorities for their wholehearted co-operation in the organisation of the contact visit, and in particular would like to thank all the persons who met its delegation each of whom provided much valuable information on their own field of competence. ECRI would also like to thank the Russian national liaison officer whose efficiency and collaboration were much appreciated by ECRI's rapporteurs. Furthermore, ECRI would like to thank all the representatives of non-governmental organisations with whom its rapporteurs met during the contact visit for the very useful contribution they made to the exercise. The following report was drawn up by ECRI under its own responsibility. It covers the situation as of 16 March 2001 and any development subsequent to this date is not covered in the following analysis nor taken into account in the conclusions and proposals made by ECRI. Executive summary Against a background of continuing political, economic and social change, the Russian Federation has taken some positive steps over recent years which are relevant to combating racism and intolerance. These include the launch of an inter-agency programme aimed at the promotion of tolerance and the prevention of extremism in Russian society, a number of concrete measures and proposals to combat extremist parties and movements, the adoption of framework legislation to enhance the protection of small indigenous communities and the increasing activity of the Office of the Human Rights Commissioner. ECRI also notes that the Constitutional Court has continued to play a fundamental role in strengthening the ability of the federal authorities to ensure that human rights, and particularly protection against racism and discrimination, are observed in all the subjects of the Federation. Recent measures aimed at ensuring that federal policies and legislation are applied at all levels are also noted in the report along with the potentially positive impact that such measures could have on the implementation of policies and legislation in the field of human rights in general and, more particularly, in the areas covered by ECRI’s remit. Problems of racism, xenophobia and discrimination persist, however and concern notably -- although not exclusively -- Chechens and other persons from the North Caucasus, persons from Central Asia, refugees and members of the Jewish community. These problems are in part linked to the difficulties encountered in ensuring that federal legislation and policies are applied at the regional and local levels. An illustration of this is the discrimination originating from the system of registration of residence and temporary stay and its enforcement procedure, an issue of particular concern to ECRI. The behaviour – of what seems to be a significant scale -- of law enforcement officials vis-à-vis members of certain minority groups is also cause for serious concern. Concern is also expressed at the unsatisfactory implementation of existing law provisions against racial violence and hate speech. These phenomena are in part connected to the presence of extremist groups and political parties and to the exploitation of social prejudice. Also noted with concern is the absence of comprehensive civil and administrative antidiscrimination statutory provisions covering discrimination in different fields of life including provision for a fully effective specialised body. In the following report, ECRI recommends to the Russian authorities that further action be taken to combat racism, xenophobia, discrimination and intolerance in a number of areas. These recommendations cover, inter alia: the need to ensure that federal legislation and policies in the areas covered by ECRI’s remit are applied at the regional and local levels; the need to review the system of registration of residence and temporary stay and its enforcement procedure in order to ensure that it is not discriminatory in practice; the need to counter illegal behaviour on the part of law enforcement officials, particularly against vulnerable groups; the need to improve and substantially strengthen the response of the authorities to racial violence and hate speech, including through a more effective implementation of existing legal provisions; the need to continue the process of countering extremist political parties and groups; and the need to adopt a body of comprehensive civil and administrative antidiscrimination provisions covering discrimination in different fields of life. SECTION I: OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION A. International legal instruments 1. The Russian Federation has ratified many international legal instruments relevant in the field of combating racism and intolerance. ECRI welcomes the signature by the Russian Federation of the Additional Protocol N°12 to the European Convention on Human Rights, which widens in a general fashion the scope of application of Article 14 of the Convention and contains a non- exhaustive list of grounds of discrimination. ECRI encourages the Russian authorities to ratify this Protocol as soon as possible. In its first report, ECRI urged the Russian authorities to sign and ratify the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. ECRI notes that the Russian Federation has signed the Charter and reiterates its call for a prompt ratification of this instrument. In its first report, ECRI furthermore urged the Russian authorities to sign and ratify the European Social Charter. ECRI welcomes the signature of the Revised Social Charter by the Russian Federation in September 2000 and urges the Russian authorities to expedite the process of ratification. ECRI also urges the Russian authorities to ratify the European Convention on Nationality, which the Russian Federation signed in November 1997. It furthermore encourages the Russian authorities to sign and ratify the European Convention on the Legal Status of Migrant Workers and the Convention on the Participation of Foreigners in Public Life at Local Level. B. Constitutional provisions and other basic provisions 2. Under Article 19(1) of the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation, the State guarantees equal rights and liberties regardless of, inter alia, sex, race, nationality, language, residence, attitude to religion and moral convictions. Article 19(2) prohibits restrictions of the rights of citizens on social, racial, national, linguistic or religious grounds. 3. Article 13(5) prohibits the establishment of public associations whose aims and actions are directed, inter alia, at incitement to social, racial, national and religious strife. Article 29(2) Prohibits propaganda or campaigns inciting social, racial, national or religious hatred and strife. 4. In Russian language and law, nationality usually means ethnic, national or religious origin or affiliation. On this basis, Article 26(1) of the Constitution stipulates that everyone is entitled to determine and indicate his national affiliation and that no-one may be compelled to determine and indicate his national affiliation. ECRI notes that mention of nationality is still imposed in some official documents issued at the level of the regions. ECRI encourages the Russian authorities to ensure that all identification and other official documents issued at the level of the regions are in conformity with the guarantees enshrined in the Constitution. 5. According to Article 26(2), everyone has the right to use his or her native language and of the free choice of language of communication, upbringing, education and creative work. Language rights are also protected by Article 68, whereby the Russian Federation "guarantees to all its peoples the right to retain their native language and to create conditions necessary for its study and development". Specific reference is made in Article 69 to the guarantee of the rights of "numerically small indigenous peoples". As will be mentioned below, primary legislation has been enacted to put this principle into practice1.
Recommended publications
  • History of the Turkish People
    June IJPSS Volume 2, Issue 6 ISSN: 2249-5894 2012 _________________________________________________________ History of the Turkish people Vahid Rashidvash* __________________________________________________________ Abstract The Turkish people also known as "Turks" (Türkler) are defined mainly as being speakers of Turkish as a first language. In the Republic of Turkey, an early history text provided the definition of being a Turk as "any individual within the Republic of Turkey, whatever his faith who speaks Turkish, grows up with Turkish culture and adopts the Turkish ideal is a Turk." Today the word is primarily used for the inhabitants of Turkey, but may also refer to the members of sizeable Turkish-speaking populations of the former lands of the Ottoman Empire and large Turkish communities which been established in Europe (particularly in Germany, France, and the Netherlands), as well as North America, and Australia. Key words: Turkish people. History. Culture. Language. Genetic. Racial characteristics of Turkish people. * Department of Iranian Studies, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Republic of Armeni. A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage, India as well as in Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences http://www.ijmra.us 118 June IJPSS Volume 2, Issue 6 ISSN: 2249-5894 2012 _________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction The Turks (Turkish people), whose name was first used in history in the 6th century by the Chinese, are a society whose language belongs to the Turkic language family (which in turn some classify as a subbranch of Altaic linguistic family.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, Power and Nationhood in Sovereign Bashkortostan
    Religion, State & Society, Vo!. 25, No. 3, 1997 Religion, Power and Nationhood in Sovereign Bashkortostan SERGEI FILATOV Relations between the nation-state and religion are always paradoxical, an effort to square the circle. Spiritual life, the search for the absolute and worship belong to a sphere which is by nature free and not susceptible to control by authority. How can a president, a police officer or an ordinary patriot decide for an individual what consti­ tutes truth, goodness or personal salvation from sin and death? On the other hand, faith forms the national character, moral norms and the concept of duty, and so a sense of national identity and social order depend upon it. Understanding this, states and national leaders throughout human history have used God for the benefit of Caesar. Even priests themselves often forget whom it is they serve. In all historical circumstances, however, religious faith shows that it stands outside state, nation and society, and consistently betrays the plans and expectations of monarchs, presidents, secret police, collaborators and patriots. It changes regardless of any orders from those in authority. Peoples, states, empires and civilisations change fundamentally or vanish completely because the basic ideas which supported them also vanish. Sometimes it is the rulers themselves, striving to preserve their kingdoms, who are unaware that their faith and view of the world are changing and themselves turn out to be the medium of the changes which destroy them. In the countries of the former USSR, indeed in all the former socialist camp, constant attempts to 'tame the spirit' were in themselves nothing new, but the histor­ ical situation, the level of public awareness and the character of religiosity were unique; and the use of religion for national and state purposes therefore acquired distinctive and somewhat grotesque characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of Male Hungarian Conquerors: European and Asian Paternal Lineages of the Conquering Hungarian Tribes
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (2020) 12: 31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00996-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Genetic analysis of male Hungarian Conquerors: European and Asian paternal lineages of the conquering Hungarian tribes Erzsébet Fóthi1 & Angéla Gonzalez2 & Tibor Fehér3 & Ariana Gugora4 & Ábel Fóthi5 & Orsolya Biró6 & Christine Keyser2,7 Received: 11 March 2019 /Accepted: 16 October 2019 /Published online: 14 January 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract According to historical sources, ancient Hungarians were made up of seven allied tribes and the fragmented tribes that split off from the Khazars, and they arrived from the Eastern European steppes to conquer the Carpathian Basin at the end of the ninth century AD. Differentiating between the tribes is not possible based on archaeology or history, because the Hungarian Conqueror artifacts show uniformity in attire, weaponry, and warcraft. We used Y-STR and SNP analyses on male Hungarian Conqueror remains to determine the genetic source, composition of tribes, and kin of ancient Hungarians. The 19 male individuals paternally belong to 16 independent haplotypes and 7 haplogroups (C2, G2a, I2, J1, N3a, R1a, and R1b). The presence of the N3a haplogroup is interesting because it rarely appears among modern Hungarians (unlike in other Finno-Ugric-speaking peoples) but was found in 37.5% of the Hungarian Conquerors. This suggests that a part of the ancient Hungarians was of Ugric descent and that a significant portion spoke Hungarian. We compared our results with public databases and discovered that the Hungarian Conquerors originated from three distant territories of the Eurasian steppes, where different ethnicities joined them: Lake Baikal- Altai Mountains (Huns/Turkic peoples), Western Siberia-Southern Urals (Finno-Ugric peoples), and the Black Sea-Northern Caucasus (Caucasian and Eastern European peoples).
    [Show full text]
  • Between Integration and Resettlement: the Meskhetian Turks
    BETWEEN INTEGRATION AND RESETTLEMENT: THE MESKHETIAN TURKS Oskari Pentikäinen and Tom Trier ECMI Working Paper # 21 September 2004 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg Germany ( +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper # 21 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller © Copyright 2004 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in August 2004 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) List of Abbreviations.................................................................................................4 I. Introduction...........................................................................................................6 1. Who Are the Meskhetian Turks?...........................................................................9 2. A History of Forced Migration............................................................................11 II. The Meskhetian Turks’ Current Demographic and Socio-Political Situation.......13 1. Georgia...............................................................................................................15 2. Azerbaijan...........................................................................................................19 3. Ukraine...............................................................................................................20 4. Russia..................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • State Report Azerbaijan
    ACFC/SR(2002)001 ______ REPORT SUBMITTED BY AZERBAIJAN PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ______ (Received on 4 June 2002) _____ TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I............................................................................................................................................ 3 II. Aggression of the Republic of Armenia against the Republic of Azerbaijan..................... 9 III. Information on the form of the State structure.................................................................. 12 IV. Information on status of international law in national legislation .................................... 13 V. Information on demographic situation in the country ...................................................... 13 VI. Main economic data - gross domestic product and per capita income ............................. 15 VII. State’s national policy in the field of the protection of the rights of persons belonging to minorities ...................................................................................................................................... 15 VIII. Population awareness on international treaties to which Azerbaijan is a party to........ 16 P A R T II..................................................................................................................................... 18 Article 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Article
    [Show full text]
  • Durable Solutions for Meskhetian Turks: the Issue Revisited
    Andrei Khanzhin* Durable Solutions for Meskhetian Turks: The Issue Revisited I. Introduction Meskhetian Turks, with their bitter experience of two deportations and years of living in exile, have been perhaps the most neglected group among the peoples forci- bly uprooted by Stalin’s order in . They remain one of the few groups not to have been officially rehabilitated or allowed to return. It is striking how shabby is the state of discourse and analysis in academic and policy circles about the history, culture and current situation of Meskhetian Turks. Though lately the number of publications on the issue seems to have increased, genuinely profound studies of the Meskhetian Turks are still lacking. In-depth knowledge on the level of their integration in different regions, on their preferences regarding repatriation or resettlement, on their lifestyle, practices, history and culture in general is in demand. Indeed, it is urgently needed, for well- informed solutions of their problems are long overdue. Meskhetian Turks want to be officially allowed to return to the region they were deported from; they seek assistance, not obstruction, in their endeavours to integrate into countries they have been living in for decades; many of them long to find a place where they could be spared harassment and the haunting fear of another displacement. Until recently, the international com- munity largely kept aloof from the problems of the Meskhetian Turks. Unfortunately, notwithstanding some seemingly positive recent developments, thus far, progress with regard to their repatriation tends to zero. Problems related to Meskhetian Turks’ inte- gration in receiving societies have not had their fair share of attention either.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and the Search for Peace in the South Caucasus: the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan (BTC) Oil Pipeline
    Oil and the Search for Peace in the South Caucasus: The Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline December 2004 Acknowledgements The following research document is a result of 18 months intensive work of International Alert’s Business & Conflict – BTC Research project team: Adam Barbolet, Davin Bremner, Phil Champain, Rachel Goldwyn, Nick Killick, Diana Klein. The team would also like to thank many other Alert staff past and present, as well as the following regional experts who significantly contributed to the project. Burcu Gultekin Ashot Khurshudyan Razi Nurullayev Zviad Shkvitaridze Arif Yunusov Staff of Himayadar- Oil Information & Resource Centre in Baku The project team is grateful to the UK government’s Global Conflict Prevention Pool (GCPP) for its generous financial support. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ 2 Acronyms........................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive summary........................................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 24 1.1 The contribution of the oil industry to conflict prevention – emerging conflict-sensitive management systems ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Dagestan: Conflict Causes
    RUSSIA’S DAGESTAN: CONFLICT CAUSES Europe Report N°192 – 3 June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. A FRAGILE INTER-ETHNIC BALANCE.................................................................... 2 A. INTER-ETHNIC COMPETITION OVER LAND AND STATE POSITIONS...............................................2 B. THE 2007 ELECTIONS .................................................................................................................4 1. Removing inter-ethnic competition from electoral politics..................................................4 2. Electoral violence and results ...............................................................................................5 III. ISLAMISM IN DAGESTAN AND CHECHEN CONNECTIONS.............................. 6 A. CHECHEN AND DAGESTANI ISLAMISTS IN THE 1990S .................................................................6 B. THE “HUNT FOR THE WAHHABIS” SINCE 1999 ...........................................................................8 C. SHARIAT JAMAAT’S GROWING INFLUENCE .................................................................................8 D. RENEWED TENSIONS WITH CHECHNYA .....................................................................................10 IV. VIOLENCE AGAINST STATE AUTHORITIES ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey in the Caspian Sea Region
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2008 Turkey In The Caspian Sea Region Seyma Akkoyunlu University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Akkoyunlu, Seyma, "Turkey In The Caspian Sea Region" (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3734. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3734 TURKEY IN THE CASPIAN SEA REGION by SEYMA AKKOYUNLU B.S. Istanbul University, 2005 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of the Masters of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, FL Spring Term 2008 Major Professor: Houman Sadri ©2008 Seyma Akkoyunlu ii ABSTRACT This thesis will determine the influence of Turkey’s domestic resources on Turkey’s foreign relations with the five Turkic states in the Caspian Sea Region. The spheres analyzed in this study are the common ties, which are history, culture, religion and language, with the regional countries, pan-Turkism, Turkey’s initial interactions as well as ongoing constructive policies in the region. Findings showed that both Turkey and the five Turkic republics were enthusiastic to carry their relations in every field to future cooperation following the break up of the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report on the Russian Federation
    CRI (99) 3 European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance First report on the Russian Federation Adopted on 26 January 1999 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) and about the other activities of the Council of Europe in this field, please contact: Secretariat of ECRI Directorate General of Human Rights – DG II Council of Europe F - 67075 STRASBOURG Cedex Tel.: +33 (0) 3 88 41 29 64 Fax: +33 (0) 3 88 41 39 87 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.coe.int/ecri 2 INTRODUCTION The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) was set up in 1994, at the instigation of the first Summit meeting of Heads of State and Government of the member States of Council of Europe, to combat the growing problems of racism, xenophobia, anti- Semitism and intolerance threatening human rights and democratic values in Europe. The members of ECRI were chosen for their recognised expertise in questions relating to racism and intolerance. The task given to ECRI was to: review member States' legislation, policies and other measures to combat racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and intolerance and their effectiveness; propose further action at local, national and European level; formulate general policy recommendations to member States; and to study international legal instruments applicable in the matter with a view to their reinforcement where appropriate. One aspect of the activities developed by ECRI to fulfil its terms of reference is its country-by- country approach, which involves carrying out an analysis of the situation in each of the member States in order to provide governments with helpful and concrete proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Let the Mountains Sing
    Let L mountains singN Prayers for the peoples of the Caucasus Every morning, the sun rises over the rugged Caucasus Mountains and casts its warm glow on more than 2,000 villages found between the Black and Caspian Seas. The Caucasus Mountains are largely unknown to the praying world; yet within these vast and beautiful mountains, some of the earth’s most unreached peoples live in oppressive spiritual darkness. Today, 45 distinct languages exist among the peoples of the Caucasus. Suspicious of outsiders, resistant to change, speaking some of the world’s most complex languages and shaped by war and conflict, the fiercly independent peoples of the Caucasus are — from a human perspective — a daunting challenge to the spread of the gospel. PEOPLE GROUPS of the CAUCASUS Every color on the map represents a distinct ethno-linguistic people group of the Caucasus. But even within these groups there are often additional linguistic breakdowns. Many of the 45 to 50 distinct Caucasus languages are among the most complex in the world. The world’s languages are categorized from Level 1, simplest to learn, to Level 4, most difficult. Most of the Caucasus languages are Level 4 languages. Source: NCRP-2014 For centuries, the Caucasus Mountains have hosted epic conquerors, power struggles, war and triumph. In Greek mythology, fire was created in the Caucasus. Prometheus was chained in its mountains. Arabs, Byzantines, Mongols, Persians, Tatars, Turks, Russians and Nazis have each tried to conquer and control the lands around the Caucasus. The many people of the Caucasus are resilient, holding fast Each rising sun carries the grace of another day for the to ancient traditions as they raise their families and support Caucasus — a day filled with hope and opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Possibilities of the Use of Non-Invasive Serological Biomarkers Severe in Population Studies
    Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 12(9): September 2019 ISSN 0974-3618 (Print) www.rjptonline.org 0974-360X (Online) RESEARCH ARTICLE Modern Possibilities of the Use of Non-Invasive Serological Biomarkers Severe in Population Studies Sergey Kotelevets1*, Sergey Chekh2, Zukhra Karakotova3 1North Caucasus State Academy, Medical Institute, PhD in Medical Sciences, Professor, Cherkessk, Russian Federation. 2North Caucasus State Academy of Humanities and Technology, Head of Department of Software Development, Cherkessk, Russian Federation. 3North Caucasus State Academy of Humanities and Technology, Medical Institute, PhD Student, Cherkessk, Russian Federation. *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The ethnic and the gender factors materially affect the prevalence of gastric atrophy. All the patients were divided into five ethnic groups: Russians, Karachays, Abazins, Circassians, Nogais. The decrease in serum gastrin-17 less than 10 pmol/l is a sensitive and specific biomarker for antral mucosal atrophy, pepsinogen-I less than 25 µg/l is a corpus mucosal atrophy biomarker (Se − 89% and 92%, Sp − 97% and 96%). Gastrin-17 and pepsinogen-I are also sensitive and specific biomarkers for mild, moderate, severe atrophy of the antrum and corpus (for severe antral mucosal atrophy Se − 96%, Sp − 92%, for severe corpus mucosal atrophy Se − 88%, Sp − 97%). A total of 75 patients with multifocal atrophic gastritis were examined histologically. 67 patients had gastrin-17 <10 pmol/l and pepsinogen-I <25 µg/l at the same time. 7 patients had gastrin-17 from 10 to 11.5 pmol/l, 1 patient had gastrin-17 = 19 pmol/l (Se − 89%). Therefore, the level of gastrin-17 and pepsinogen-I simultaneously decreases among patients with multifocal atrophic gastritis.
    [Show full text]