DOCSLIB.ORG

Turkey in the Caspian Sea Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turkey in the Caspian Sea Region University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2008 Turkey In The Caspian Sea Region Seyma Akkoyunlu University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Akkoyunlu, Seyma, "Turkey In The Caspian Sea Region" (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3734. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3734 TURKEY IN THE CASPIAN SEA REGION by SEYMA AKKOYUNLU B.S. Istanbul University, 2005 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of the Masters of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, FL Spring Term 2008 Major Professor: Houman Sadri ©2008 Seyma Akkoyunlu ii ABSTRACT This thesis will determine the influence of Turkey’s domestic resources on Turkey’s foreign relations with the five Turkic states in the Caspian Sea Region. The spheres analyzed in this study are the common ties, which are history, culture, religion and language, with the regional countries, pan-Turkism, Turkey’s initial interactions as well as ongoing constructive policies in the region. Findings showed that both Turkey and the five Turkic republics were enthusiastic to carry their relations in every field to future cooperation following the break up of the Soviet Union. However the Turkic Republics’ interest in Turkish development model gradually declined starting from the 1994s.The hypothesis that socio-cultural ties will ease establishing close foreign relations is applicable to all five republics. The Turkic states welcomed Turkey’s educational and cultural policies with great willingness. In the field of business we find that Turkish economy follows a similar pattern in its relations with the Azerbaijani and Central Asian markets. Accordant policy goals of Turkey and the five republics led Turkey to establish close foreign relations with the regional countries. Turkey tried to give military aid to the Turkic republics of Central Asia in their struggle against terrorist groups which have the capacity to destabilize governments and to threaten international security. The hypothesis that the more Turkey has business interests in the Caspian Sea Region the more Turkey will have closer foreign relations with Turkic countries is mostly apparent in the case of Azerbaijan. In the area of energy politics Turkey has its strongest link with Azerbaijan. Besides being strong economic partners Turkey is Azerbaijan’s biggest supporter in the region against Armenia. iii To my uncle, Akif Babali (1961-2006) iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the guidance of my advisor and committee chair, Dr. Houman Sadri under whose supervision I chose this topic and began the thesis. I also thank the members of my graduate committee, Dr. Trudi Morales and Dr Barbara Kinsey for their suggestions. Lastly, and most importantly, I would like to thank my parents for their constant encouragement and support. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xi LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ xii LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVATIONS ...................................................................xiii CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW AND LITERATURE REVIEW............................................ 1 1.1 Defining Concepts and Theory................................................................................. 1 1.2 Literature Review ..................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2: TURKEY’S HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL TIES WITH THE TURKIC COUNTRIES .................................................................................................... 16 2.1 Introduction............................................................................................................. 16 2.2 Turkic People of the World and Pan-Turkism........................................................ 16 2.2.1 Turkic People of the World.............................................................................. 16 2.2.2 Kemalist Ideology: Nationalism in the Turkish Republic ............................... 18 2.2.3 Pan-Turkism: The Union of all the Turks........................................................ 21 2.2.4 Leading Ideologists of Pan-Turkism................................................................ 22 2.2.4.1 Ismail Gaspirali......................................................................................... 22 2.2.4.2 Yusuf Akcura............................................................................................ 26 2.2.5 World War I and Pan-Turkism ........................................................................ 27 2.2.6 World War II and After.................................................................................... 31 2.2.7 Reactions on Pan-Turkism............................................................................... 33 2.3 Language................................................................................................................. 35 2.3.1 Dialectic Similarities between the Turkish Language and the Languages of Central Asian Countries............................................................................................ 37 vi 2.3.1.1 Azeris ........................................................................................................ 37 2.3.1.2 Kazakhs..................................................................................................... 37 2.3.1.3 Uzbeks....................................................................................................... 38 2.3.1.4 Turkmens .................................................................................................. 39 2.3.1.5 Kirghizs..................................................................................................... 40 2.4 Islam as a Shared Identity between Turkey and the Turkic World ........................ 40 2.5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 47 CHAPTER 3: ECONOMIC RELATIONS BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE REGIONAL COUNTRIES............................................................................................... 49 3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................. 49 3.2 Basic Drawbacks and Motivations to Invest in the Caspian Sea Region ............... 50 3.3 Bilateral Economic Relations between Turkey and the Regional Countries.......... 54 3.3.1 Turkey-Azerbaijan ........................................................................................... 54 3.3.1.1 Turkey’s Oil Demand ............................................................................... 54 3.3.1.2 The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Project ............................................... 57 3.3.1.3 The South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Project ................................................ 60 3.3.1.4 Trade with Azerbaijan............................................................................... 62 3.3.1.5 Eximbank Credits from Turkey ................................................................ 64 3.3.2 Turkey-Kazakhstan .......................................................................................... 66 3.3.2.1 Turkish Investment in Kazakhstan............................................................ 66 3.3.2.2 Trade with Kazakhstan ............................................................................. 69 3.3.2.3 Eximbank Credits...................................................................................... 71 3.3.3 Turkey-Kyrgyzstan .......................................................................................... 72 vii 3.3.3.1 Turkish Investment in Kyrgyzstan............................................................ 72 3.3.3.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Investing in Kyrgyzstan..................... 75 3.3.3.3 Trade with Kyrgyzstan.............................................................................. 78 3.3.3.4 Eximbank Credits...................................................................................... 80 3.3.4 Turkey-Turkmenistan ...................................................................................... 80 3.3.4.1 Turkey’s Need for Natural Gas................................................................. 80 3.3.4.2 Turkmen-Turkey-Europe Gas Pipeline..................................................... 83 3.3.4.3 Trade with Turkmenistan.......................................................................... 85 3.3.4.4 Problems that Businesspersons Face In Turkmenistan............................. 87 3.3.4.5 Eximbank Credits...................................................................................... 88 3.3.5 Turkey-Uzbekistan........................................................................................... 89 3.3.5.1 Turkish Investment in Uzbekistan ...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Administrative Management of Territories Inhabited by Kyrgyz and Kipchaks in the Kokand Khanate
    EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management Journal DOI : 10.36713/epra0414 |ISI I.F Value: 0.815|SJIF Impact Factor(2020): 7.572 ISSN:2348 – 814X Volume: 7| Issue: 1| August 2020 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT OF TERRITORIES INHABITED BY KYRGYZ AND KIPCHAKS IN THE KOKAND KHANATE Boboev Mirodillo Kosimjon ugli Student of Fergana State University, Uzbekistan. -----------------------------------ANNOTATION-------------------------------- This article provides information about territories inhabited by Kyrgyz and Kipchaks in the Kokand Khanate, their forms of social, economic and administrative management, as well as their senior management positions. KEYWORDS: Kyrgyz, Kipchak, tribe, khan, governor, mirshab, Kokand, channel, feudal, valley. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSSION In the first half of the XIX century, the Kokand khanate was the largest region in Central Asia. The Kokand khanate was bordered by East Turkestan in the east, the Bukhara Emirate and the Khiva Khanate in the west. The territory of the khanate in the north was completely subjugated by three Kazakh juzes and bordered by Russia. The southern borders of the khanate included mountainous areas such as Karategin, Kulob, Darvaz, Shogunan. For these regions, there will be bloody wars with the Emirate of Bukhara, which passed from hand to hand. The territory of the Kokand khanate, in contrast to the Bukhara emirate and the Khiva khanate had many wetlands, valleys and fertile lands. The center of the khanate was the Fergana Valley, where such large cities as Kokand, Margilan, Uzgen, Andizhan, and Namangan were located. Large cities such as Tashkent, Shymkent, Turkestan, Avliyota, Pishtak, Oqmasjid were also under the rule of Kokand khanate. The population of the Kokand khanate is relatively dense, about 3 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponimys with Ancient Turk Origins in the Balkans
    IBAC 2012 vol.2 TOPONIMYS WITH ANCIENT TURK ORIGINS IN THE BALKANS Prof .Ass. Hajiyeva GALIBA Nakhchivan State Univresity, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract One of the sources dealing with the ancient Turkic history are toponyms. Toponymic investigations show that most of the ancient geographical names which have spread in Eurosia, in Central Asia, from North Africa, to Eastern Turkistan even in Siberia and these names were formed before Roman and Byzantine periods. So development of toponymic investigations, study of the history of Turkic peoples and scientific investigation of existing geographical names which keep the history of Turkic peoples have great significance. One of the uninvestigated fields of the Turkic history are geographical names keeping historical facts within are the holy Balkan areas. The toponymic investigations carried on the Balkans show that these territories are the places were the ancient Turkic tribes were firstly settled and possessed. This fact is proved by the Turkic tribe names and by the words of different semantic meaning of the languages of Turkic tribes. The great deal of Balkan geographical names are the names derived out of ethnoniyms thus the names reflecting ancient Turkic tribe names (Astipos//Astepe//Ishtip, Izletdere, Vardar, Sofular, Gilan, Sahsuvar kariyesi, Kosalar village, Tatarli kariyesi, in the Kosova, Uskup, Usturumca, Kumanova, Propishtip, Kochana, Makedonska Kamenika in Makedony, Araz district, Arazli, Azman, Cepine, Coban, Chorlu, Culfalar, Horozlar, Kangirlar, Sakarli, Sungurlar, Karuk, Kaspi, Kaz//Kas, Kazancilar, Kecililer, Kuman, Padarlar, Sofular, Tatar, Uzlar in Bulgaria) show that Balkans historically were Turkic areas. Geographical names are the real witnesses of history. We must pay great attention to the scientific investigations of the geographical names in Balkan states.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptionsjournal of International Affairs
    PERCEPTIONSJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PERCEPTIONS Summer-Autumn 2015 Volume XX Number 2-3 XX Number 2015 Volume Summer-Autumn PERCEPTIONS The Great War and the Ottoman Empire: Origins Ayşegül SEVER and Nuray BOZBORA Redefining the First World War within the Context of Clausewitz’s “Absolute War” Dystopia Burak GÜLBOY Unionist Failure to Stay out of the War in October-November 1914 Feroz AHMAD Austro-Ottoman Relations and the Origins of World War One, 1912-14: A Reinterpretation Gül TOKAY Ottoman Military Reforms on the eve of World War I Odile MOREAU The First World War in Contemporary Russian Histography - New Areas of Research Iskander GILYAZOV Summer-Autumn 2015 Volume XX - Number 2-3 ISSN 1300-8641 PERCEPTIONS Editor in Chief Ali Resul Usul Deputy Editor Birgül Demirtaş Managing Editor Engin Karaca Book Review Editor İbrahim Kaya English Language and Copy Editor Julie Ann Matthews Aydınlı International Advisory Board Bülent Aras Mustafa Kibaroğlu Gülnur Aybet Talha Köse Ersel Aydınlı Mesut Özcan Florian Bieber Thomas Risse Pınar Bilgin Lee Hee Soo David Chandler Oktay Tanrısever Burhanettin Duran Jang Ji Hyang Maria Todorova Ahmet İçduygu Ole Wæver Ekrem Karakoç Jaap de Wilde Şaban Kardaş Richard Whitman Fuat Keyman Nuri Yurdusev Homepage: http://www.sam.gov.tr The Center for Strategic Research (Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi- SAM) conducts research on Turkish foreign policy, regional studies and international relations, and makes scholarly and scientific assessments of relevant issues. It is a consultative body of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs providing strategic insights, independent data and analysis to decision makers in government. As a nonprofit organization, SAM is chartered by law and has been active since May 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD WAR I Goes Mad the BACKSTORY: the OTTOMAN EMPIRE
    The World WORLD WAR I Goes Mad THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE • By the beginning of the 20th century, the Ottoman Empire had begun to disintegrate under a variety of internal and external pressures. • In their move to join the modern world by becoming a nation-state, ethnic nationalism emerged as a rallying cry to define the “new” Turkey. Becoming Evil–p. 54 THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE • A series of Ottoman military disasters between 1908-1912, leads to Turkey being seized by an ultra- nationalistic, militaristic, and chauvinistic leadership. Becoming Evil–p. 55 THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE . Within a period of 2 weeks, the Ottomans lose 75% of their European territories. Greeks, Serbs, and Bulgarians revolted and broke away from the empire. It’s an ass whooping. This is the first major military defeat from former subject states the empire had to face. Leads to a real fear of collapse. They need to keep what they have left at all costs—they will now justify everything to do so. The Armenian Genocide Video THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE • In 1912, while Turkish Nationalism was growing, Greece, Serbia, and Bulgaria broke away and expelled their former Turkish masters. THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE . 100,000 refugees flood into Constantinople . Nowhere to put them . Horror stories about what “the Christians” had done to them . Feeds into the story that “Christians are out to get the Muslims” . Desire for revenge begins to grow THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE In the wake of this disaster, a new political power rises in Turkey: .
    [Show full text]
  • Mongol Aristocrats and Beyliks in Anatolia
    MONGOL ARISTOCRATS AND BEYLIKS IN ANATOLIA. A STUDY OF ASTARĀBĀDĪ’S BAZM VA RAZM* Jürgen Paul Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Abstract This paper is about beyliks – political entities that include at least one town (or a major fortress or both), its agricultural hinterland and a (large) amounts of pasture. It is also about Mongols in Anatolia in the beylik period (in particular the second half of the 14th century) and their leading families some of whom are presented in detail. The paper argues that the Eretna sultanate, the Mongol successor state in Anatolia, underwent a drawn-out fission process which resulted in a number of beyliks. Out of this number, at least one beylik had Mongol leaders. Besides, the paper argues that Mongols and their leading families were much more important in this period than had earlier been assumed. arge parts of Anatolia came under Mongol rule earlier than western Iran. The Mongols had won a resounding victory over the Rum L Seljuqs at Köse Dağ in 1243, and Mongols then started occupying winter and summer pastures in Central and Eastern Anatolia, pushing the Turks and Türkmens to the West and towards the coastal mountain ranges. Later, Mongol Anatolia became part of the Ilkhanate, and this province was one of the focal points of Ilkhanid politics and intrigues.1 The first troops, allegedly three tümens, had already been dispatched to Anatolia by ———— * Research for this paper was conducted in the framework of Sonderforschungsbereich 586 (“Differenz und Integration”, see www.nomadsed.de), hosted by the universities at Halle-Wittenberg and Leipzig and funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia: Confronting Independence
    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY UNLOCKING THE ASSETS: ENERGY AND THE FUTURE OF CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS CENTRAL ASIA: CONFRONTING INDEPENDENCE MARTHA BRILL OLCOTT SENIOR RESEARCH ASSOCIATE CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ENERGY STUDY BY THE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY – APRIL 1998 CENTRAL ASIA: CONFRONTING INDEPENDENCE Introduction After the euphoria of gaining independence settles down, the elites of each new sovereign country inevitably stumble upon the challenges of building a viable state. The inexperienced governments soon venture into unfamiliar territory when they have to formulate foreign policy or when they try to forge beneficial economic ties with foreign investors. What often proves especially difficult is the process of redefining the new country's relationship with its old colonial ruler or federation partners. In addition to these often-encountered hurdles, the newly independent states of Central Asia-- Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan-- have faced a host of particular challenges. Some of these emanate from the Soviet legacy, others--from the ethnic and social fabric of each individual polity. Yet another group stems from the peculiarities of intra- regional dynamics. Finally, the fledgling states have been struggling to step out of their traditional isolation and build relations with states outside of their neighborhood. This paper seeks to offer an overview of all the challenges that the Central Asian countries have confronted in the process of consolidating their sovereignty. The Soviet Legacy and the Ensuing Internal Challenges What best distinguishes the birth of the Central Asian states from that of any other sovereign country is the incredible weakness of pro-independence movements throughout the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Yüzey Araştırmalar Işığında Erzurum Pasinler İlçesinde Tespit Edilen Obsidyen Merkezleri Ve Atölyeleri
    MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 2021 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3 MANAS Journal of Social Studies 2021 Volume: 10 No: 3 ISSN: 1694-7215 Research Paper / Araştırma Makalesi Yüzey Araştırmalar Işığında Erzurum Pasinler İlçesinde Tespit Edilen Obsidyen Merkezleri ve Atölyeleri Alpaslan CEYLAN1 ve Seval AKÇELİK2 Öz Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi, jeolojik yapısı nedeniyle önemli obsidyen yataklarına ev sahipliği yapmaktadır. Ana hatlarıyla Erzurum-Kars Platosu’nda bulunan volkanik sahalar, bölgenin temel obsidyen kaynaklarını oluşturmaktadır. Erzurum’un batısında yer alan Söğütlü’nün kuzeyindeki tepelik alanlar, Palandöken Dağı’nın güneybatısı, Pasinler ve çevresi obsidyen yataklarının tespit edildiği önemli arazilerdir. Pasinler ilçesi jeolojik karakterini, Pliosen sonu ve Pleistosen içinde meydana gelen tektonik hareketler sonucunda kazanmıştır. İlçe ve yakın çevresinde andezit, bazalt ve obsidyen gibi dış püskürük kayaçlar geniş bir yayılım göstermektedir. Bölgede 1998 yılında başladığımız yüzey araştırmalarında çalışma sahalarımızdan biri de Pasinler olmuştur. Pasinlerde yaptığımız çalışmalarda çok sayıda keramik ve obsidyen tespit edilmiştir. Gelişmiş obsidyen analiz yöntemlerine rağmen çalışma alanımızda bulunan merkezlerin sadece birkaçından alınan örneklerin analizleri yapılmıştır. İlçe ve yakın çevresinde Kotandüzü, Pelitli ve Tımar gibi önemli obsidyen merkezlerinin yanı sıra Cin Kalesi, Çalıyazı Kalesi, Kavuşturan Kalesi ve Sos Höyük’te yapılan araştırmalarda bu merkezlerin de önemli birer obsidyen atölyesi olabileceği düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty in Central Asia: Kazakhstan Versus Tajikistan
    Global Majority E-Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1 (June 2011), pp. 19-30 Poverty in Central Asia: Kazakhstan versus Tajikistan Gregory Chapman Abstract This article reviews the existence and nature of poverty in the two very different Central Asian nations of Kazakhstan and Tajikistan. Kazakhstan is oil-rich and agriculturally productive. Tajikistan is poor, rural, isolated and mountainous. Summarizing the nature of poverty in these two countries, this article seeks to understand some of the driving factors behind it. Though by no means comprehensive or complete, this article illustrates the vast differences between these two countries of the same ‘neighborhood’ and, sadly, one has great hope of outgrowing poverty and the other has not. I. Introduction Central Asia has long been a so-called ‘crossroads of the world’, a place where ‘east meets west’ in the narrow valleys and of the Tian Shan and on the vast plains of the Steppe.1 Although central to both the 19th century geopolitical struggle known as the ‘Great Game’ as well as to modern energy-driven geopolitics, the region remains little understood - perhaps sheltered by its high mountains and long wind-swept winters, perhaps by its long Soviet past or even by its intricate, ostensibly foreign culture. Though this region is, due to its fragile post-Soviet independence and relative richness in energy reserves, more vital to our own national interests than ever, it is safe to say that most Americans know very little of this ‘land of the Stans’. Despite the seemed wealth of some of the Central Asian nations, particularly Kazakhstan,2 in oil, natural gas and other mineral resources, as well as a relative abundance of arable 1 One of the world’s highest mountainous plateaus, stretching from western China in the east to central Kazakhstan and eastern Uzbekistan in the west.
    [Show full text]
  • CAP Papers 161, May 2016, Khalid
    THE ROOTS OF UZBEKISTAN: NATION MAKING IN THE EARLY SOVIET UNION CAP PAPERS 161 (CERIA SERIES) Adeeb Khalid1 The political map of Central Asia with which we are all familiar—the “five Stans” north of Afghanistan and Iran—took shape between 1924 and 1936. The five states of today are each identified with an ethnic nation. A hundred years ago, it looked very different. The southern extremities of the Russian empire consisted of two provinces—Turkestan and the Steppe region—and two protectorates—Bukhara and Khiva—in which local potentates enjoyed considerable internal autonomy as long as they affirmed their vassalage to the Russian Empire. No ethnic or national names were attached to territories. Indeed, the ethnic nomenclature in the region was different and quite unstable. Outsider accounts of the period spoke of the population being composed of Sarts, Uzbeks, Kipchaks, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Turcomans and other “tribes,” with different authors using different categorizations. Even the Russian imperial census of 1897 did not use a consistent set of labels across Central Asia. In Central Asian usage, on the other hand, the most common term for describing the indigenous community was “Muslims of Turkestan.” Where did the nationalized territorial entities come from and, more basically, from where did the national categories emerge? During the Cold War, we were comfortable with the explanation that the division of Central Asia into national republics as a classic form of divide and rule in which the Soviets destroyed the primordial unity of the region for their own ends. All too often, writers lay the blame at the feet of Stalin himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Doğu Anadolu Yiğişim Karmaşiği (Tortum-Narman-Oltu-Pasinler- Horasan-Erzurum Kd Türkiye ) Kuzey Kesimi Metalojenik Kuşak Mi Dir ?
    DOĞU ANADOLU YIĞIŞIM KARMAŞIĞI (TORTUM-NARMAN-OLTU-PASİNLER- HORASAN-ERZURUM KD TÜRKİYE ) KUZEY KESİMİ METALOJENİK KUŞAK MI DIR ? İsmet Cengiz1, Mehmet Aslan2, Serkan Özkümüş3 ve Neşat Konak4 1 Demir Export A.Ş., Ankara, Türkiye, 2 MTA Orta Anadolu IV. Bölge Müdürlüğü, Malatya, Türkiye, 3 MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Maden Etüt ve Arama Dairesi, 06800, Ankara, Türkiye, 4 MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, 06800, Ankara, Türkiye. İnceleme alanı, Erzurum kuzeyinde, Tortum-Narman-Oltu-Şenkaya-Pasinler ve Horasan ilçeleri arasında yer almakta olup “Doğu Anadolu Yığışım Karmaşığı” olarak tanımlanan bölgenin kuzey kenarını oluşturmaktadır. Yığışım karmaşığının en yaşlı kaya birimleri temeli oluşturan Erzurum Kars Ofiyolit Zonuna ait ofiyolitik kayaçlardır. Tipik bir yığışım pirizması özelliğinde ve melanj karekteri sunan bu birim üzerine, Eosenden Pliyo-Kuvaternere kadar devam eden volkano sedimanter bir istif gelmektedir. MTA tarafından son yıllarda bu bölgede yapılan çalışmalarda farklı tip alterasyon ve cevherleşmeler tespit edilmiştir. Ofiyolitik kayaçlarda krom cevherleşmelerinin yanında Kıbrıs Tip Masif Sülfit ile Lisvenitlere bağlı epitermal sistemde gelişmiş civa ve altın; Tersiyer havzada ise damar tip Cu-Pb-Zn ve epitermal As-Au cevherleşmeleri izlenir. Belirli bir dizilim ve farklı litolojiler içinde yer alan bu alterasyon ve cevherleşmeler, Doğu Anadolu Yığışım Karmaşığı olarak adlandırılan bölgenin kuzey kesimini önemli bir metalojenik kuşak haline getirmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Metalojenik Kuşak, Erzurum Kars Ofiyolit Zonu, Doğu Anadolu Yığışım. IS THE NORTHERN SECTION OF THE EASTERN ANATOLIAN ACCERETIONARY PRISM (TORTUM-NARMAN-OLTU-PASİNLER- HORASAN-ERZURUM NE TURKEY ) A METALLOGENIC BELT ? İsmet Cengiz1, Mehmet Aslan2, Serkan Özkümüş3 and Neşat Konak4 1 Demir Export A.Ş., Ankara, Turkey, 2 MTA Orta Anadolu IV. Bölge Müdürlüğü, Malatya, Turkey, 3 MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Maden Etüt ve Arama Dairesi, 06800, Ankara, Turkey, 4 MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Life in Central Asia, 1943-1985
    Muslim Life in Central Asia, 1943-1985 Eren Murat Tasar, Harvard University, Visiting Research Fellow, Social Research Center, American University of Central Asia The period from World War II to the rise of Gorbachev saw important changes in the realms of Islamic practice, education, and social and moral norms in Soviet Central Asia. In particular, the establishment of four geographic “spiritual administrations” to oversee and manage Muslim religious life in the Soviet Union in 1943 1, the foundation of a special state committee to oversee the affairs of non-Orthodox faiths in 1944, and the opening of the country’s only legal madrasah in 1945 (in Bukhara, Uzbekistan) inaugurated a new chapter in the history of Islam in the Soviet Union. Subsequent decades saw the professionalization of a legally registered, ecclesiastical Islamic hierarchy affiliated with the party-state, as well as the growth of unregistered networks of Islamic teachers and prayer leaders. On a broader societal level, the increased prosperity of the Khrushchev and Brezhnev years (1953-1982) witnessed important social developments such as a sharp decrease in public observance of Islamic rituals and strictures (the prohibition of pork and alcohol consumption, for instance) and, in urban areas, a rise in interfaith marriage. Muslim identity, as well as the social and religious life of Muslim communities, evolved in Central Asia during the Soviet period. Anthropologists, historians, and political scientists studying Islam in Central Asia have debated the nature of this evolution in the realms of social, cultural and political life. The analysis has tended to define the relationship between Muslims and the Soviet 1 These being the spiritual administrations of Russia and Siberia, Transcaucasia, the Northern Caucasus, and Central Asia and Kazakstan (SADUM).
    [Show full text]
  • Nonproliferation Approaches in the Caucasus
    Report: Nonproliferation Approaches in the Caucasus NONPROLIFERATION APPROACHES IN THE CAUCASUS by Tamara C. Robinson Tamara C. Robinson is a Senior Researcher at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. ecent reports of the vast oil deposits in the Caspian Caucasian nuclear-weapon-free zone. It also evaluates Sea region have focused international attention U.S. policy responses to existing regional proliferation Ron the importance of stability in the Caucasus. threats. While the desire to stem proliferation may exist Yet the nuclear materials and expertise in these often in all three republics, economic conditions and problems overlooked newly independent states (Georgia, Arme- with domestic policy implementation, as a result of weak nia, and Azerbaijan) also pose a problem of international statehood, may override this desire if the West does not concern on three levels. At the ground level, maintain- offer additional assistance to support and strengthen non- ing control over these materials and watching over sci- proliferation efforts. entific expertise are imperative, yet measures are lacking as in most regions of the former Soviet Union, including MATERIALS AND THEIR PROTECTION, Russia herself. At the domestic policy level, the politi- CONTROL, AND ACCOUNTING cal and economic instability of these states in transition hampers the strengthening of key institutions for the pre- In order to understand proliferation problems on the vention of proliferation and provides an environment ground level, it is imperative to take stock of the nuclear conducive to black market activities. At the regional materials and control over them in each of the Cauca- level, the Caucasus represent both a geostrategically vi- sian republics and to assume that material protection, tal conduit and buffer between Russia and the Middle control, and accounting (MPC & A) will help guard East and from the Caspian Sea to the West.
    [Show full text]