DOCSLIB.ORG

Hijra and Forced Migration from Nineteenth-Century Russia to The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hijra and Forced Migration from Nineteenth-Century Russia to The Cahiers du monde russe Russie - Empire russe - Union soviétique et États indépendants 41/1 | 2000 Varia Hijra and forced migration from nineteenth- century Russia to the Ottoman Empire A critical analysis of the Great Tatar emigration of 1860-1861 Brian Glyn Williams Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/monderusse/39 DOI: 10.4000/monderusse.39 ISSN: 1777-5388 Publisher Éditions de l’EHESS Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2000 Number of pages: 79-108 ISBN: 2-7132-1353-3 ISSN: 1252-6576 Electronic reference Brian Glyn Williams, « Hijra and forced migration from nineteenth-century Russia to the Ottoman Empire », Cahiers du monde russe [Online], 41/1 | 2000, Online since 15 January 2007, Connection on 20 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/monderusse/39 ; DOI : 10.4000/monderusse.39 © École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris. BRIAN GLYN WILLIAMS HIJRA AND FORCED MIGRATION FROM NINETEENTH-CENTURY RUSSIA TO THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE A critical analysis of the Great Crimean Tatar emigration of 1860-1861 THE LARGEST EXAMPLES OF FORCED MIGRATIONS in Europe since the World War II era have involved the expulsion of Muslim ethnic groups from their homelands by Orthodox Slavs. Hundreds of thousands of Bulgarian Turks were expelled from Bulgaria by Todor Zhivkov’s communist regime during the late 1980s; hundreds of thousands of Bosniacs were cleansed from their lands by Republika Srbska forces in the mid-1990s; and, most recently, close to half a million Kosovar Muslims have been forced from their lands by Yugoslav forces in Kosovo in Spring of 1999. This process can be seen as a continuation of the “Great Retreat” of Muslim ethnies from the Balkans, Pontic rim and Caucasus related to the nineteenth-century collapse of Ottoman Muslim power in this region. The first “dominoe” to fall in this historic process of retreat by former Ottoman Muslim populations was a small Turco- Muslim ethnic group known as the Crimean Tatars. An analysis of the Crimean Tatar mass migrations from the Russian Empire to the Ottoman Empire in the nineteenth century can shed some light on the process that has seen millions of Muslims uprooted and forced to migrate to the Muslim core of the Otttoman Empire, Anatolia. To understand the migration of the Crimean Tatars one must go back to the period of the Crimean War. In the aftermath of the Crimean War of 1853-1856 approximately 200,000 Crimean Tatars from a total population of roughly 300,000 living in the Russian Empire’s Tauride Province (the Crimean peninsula and neighboring steppe lands) abandoned their ancestral lands and migrated to the Ottoman Empire in a process known as hijra (religious migration). The strange mass movement of two Cahiers du Monde russe, 41/1, Janvier-mars 2000, pp. 79-108. 80 BRIAN GLYN WILLIAMS thirds of this Muslim people from their ancestral lands to the ak toprak (“white soil”, i.e. sacred land) of the Ottoman caliph-sultan is one of the least understood migrations related to Russian colonial rule in the Muslim borderlands. While this migration can be seen in part as a sub-plot to the Great Retreat of Muslim ethnies such as the Circassians, Ubykhs, Abkhazians, Chechens, Nogais, Bosniacs, Pomaks, Balkan Turks, Laz and other Muslim groups related to the nineteenth-century collapse of Muslim rule in the Balkans, the Pontic rim and the Caucasus, this movement had its own peculiar dynamics. As will be demonstrated, this little understood migration was partially the result of colonial policies specific to the Tauride province and internal mechanisms working within nineteenth- century Crimean Muslim society. In addition, events surrounding the Crimean War, which was fought across the lands of Crimea long settled by Tatar peasants, acted as a catalyst for this mass emigration. In order to understand the background to this migration, which took place between 1859 and 1862, one must in fact look back to the Crimean Tatars’ position during the Crimean War. There are considerable differences of opinion between many nineteenth-century tsarist officials and Soviet propagandists on one side and the Crimean Tatars and their sympathizers (many of whom were Russian) on the other side concerning the Crimean Tatars’ role during the Crimean War. General Menshikov (the commander of the Crimean front during the Crimean War) and several Soviet historians have generally depicted the Crimean Tatars as traitors to the Russian rodina (homeland) during this conflict. The Crimean Tatars’ communal betrayal of Russia during this war is presented in many post-1944 sources as a rehearsal for this nation’s later “mass betrayal” of the Soviet Union during World War II. P. N. Nadinskii’s work Essays on the history of the Crimea (Ocherki po istorii Kryma), published just seven years after the deportation of the entire Crimean Tatar nation in 1944, is considered a classic of historical revisionism and generally paints a negative picture of the Crimean Tatars. In this work Nadinskii writes “The massive migration of the Tatars to Turkey also appeared as a direct response to the war. The main cause of this emigration was the Tatars’ fear of just retribution for their traitorous behavior during the war.”1 It was, according to this popular viewpoint, the Crimean Tatars’ “fanatical” attachment to their co-religionists, the Turks, that led this people into collusion with the Ottomans and their allies during the Crimean War. At the conclusion of the war, according to anti-Tatar accounts, the Crimea’s Muslim population, in a religious frenzy, abandoned the Russian Empire in a mass migration to join their Muslim allies in the Ottoman Empire. On the other hand, the Crimean Tatars and their sympathizers stress this people’s loyalty during the Crimean War and claim that they were actually the passive victims of Russian attacks during the conflict. A nineteenth-century Russian writer living in the Crimea, Evgenii Markov, claims that the Russian populace of the Crimea (as opposed to the officials in far off St. Petersburg) felt that 1. P. N. Nadinskii, Ocherki po istorii Kryma (Simferopol´: Krymizdat, 1951): 140. HIJRA AND FORCED MIGRATION 81 the Crimean Tatars had actually been loyal during the war. According to this source “With one voice they say that, without the Tatars, we would have fallen; all means of transport were exclusively in their hands.”2 A second Russian source, G. I. Levitskii claims that “All this slander and censure” against the Crimean Tatars was an obvious pretext by those not familiar with the Crimea or its Tatar inhabitants to rid this territory of its Muslim population.3 General Totleben, the defender of Sevastopol during the Allied French, British, Ottoman and Sardinian invasion of the Crimea (1854-1856), mentions that relations between the Russian peasants and Muslim Tatars of the Crimea during the war were friendly and writes: “Between the Russians and Tatars there is no noticeable mutual hatred and our simple people now are extraordinarily regretful about the departure of the latter.”4 From London, the exiled Russian writer Alexander Herzen wrote: “The general opinion of all those who know the Crimea is unanimously in favor of the Tatars. This people is quiet and submissive and does not have any sort of prejudice against the Russian government, in spite of all the oppression, it has never thought about going over to its co-religionists and for long has not been fanatic.”5 An examination of the Crimean Tatars’ status during the Crimean War (and earlier Russo-Turkish wars) favors the latter viewpoint and, in many ways, explains the unprecedented mass migrations of Crimean Tatars to the Ottoman Empire during the mid-nineteenth century. Most contemporary accounts indicate that the Crimean Tatars were victimized during the Crimean War and this experience destabilized this community and left it prone to calls for migration from community religious leaders. TThhee sstt aatt uuss ooff tt hhee CCrrii mmeeaann TTaatt aarrss dduurrii nngg tt hhee eeaarrll yy RRuussssoo--TTuurrkkii sshh wwaarrss It is generally agreed that the roots of the mass nineteenth-century migration of the Crimean Tatars to the Ottoman Empire lay in this minority’s treatment during the Crimean War of 1853-1856. While there were many factors operating in the nineteenth-century Russian province of the Tauride that would have impelled the Crimean Tatar community of this era to abandon its homeland for the Ottoman Empire (in particular mass land confiscations by Russian landowners known as pomeshchiki), the pressure to emigrate was dramatically increased in time of war. Eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Russian authorities were all too aware of the Crimean Muslims’ continuing identification with the Ottomans during the Russo- 2. Evgenii Markov, Ocherki Kryma (Simferopol’: Tavria, 1995): 122. 3. G. I. Levitskii, “Pereselenie tatar iz Kryma v Turtsiiu,” Vestnik Evropy, 5 (1882): 125. 4. E. I. Totleben, “O vyselenii tatar iz Kryma v 1860 godu,” Russkaia starina (June 1893): 534. 5. A. Herzen, “Gonenie na krymskikh tatar,” Kolokol, 117 (Dec. 22, 1861): 973. 82 BRIAN GLYN WILLIAMS Turkish wars of 1787-1792, 1806-1812, 1828-1829, 1853-1856 and 1877-1878 and considered this Islamic community to be a potential fifth column in time of war. There were of course grounds for distrusting the Crimean Tatars’ historic, cultural, ethnic and religious links with the Ottoman Empire. On many levels the Crimea’s Muslim community certainly did consider itself to belong to a religiously-defined “imagined community” (the umma, the ecumenical community of Muslims) that included the Ottoman Muslims. Russian military strategists in particular feared the presence of this unreliable Muslim community in the Crimean peninsula which was seen as a vital fortress guarding Russia’s southern flank against the Ottomans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle East Unit: Reading and Questions Part 1:​ Introduction Located at the Junction of Three Continents—​Europe​,​
    Middle East Unit: Reading and Questions Part 1: Introduction ​ Located at the junction of three continents—Europe, Asia, and Africa—the region ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ known as the Middle East has historically been a crossroads for conquerors, peoples, trade, and ideas as well as a transition zone for political and cultural interaction. Today the Middle East’s strategic location as a tricontinental hub, its vast petroleum reserves, its importance to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and its many political disputes give it a global significance out of proportion to its size. The Middle East is a culturally, politically, and economically diverse region that extends for some 5,000 miles (8,000 kilometers) from west to east and some 2,000 miles (3,200 kilometers) from north to south. It is made up of several countries located on or near the southern and eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Although definitions vary, it is generally understood to encompass Egypt, Lebanon, ​ ​ ​ ​ Syria, Jordan, Israel, the Gaza Strip, and the West Bank, Iran, Iraq, and the Arabian ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Peninsula, which comprises Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, the United Arab ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait. The part of the region closest to Europe ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ formerly was known as the Near East, and some agencies still use that term instead of the Middle East to describe the entire region. 1. What are the 3 continents that house the “Middle East”? 2. What are they known for? 3. Label your map with the countries and bodies of waters in this text. Color the waters blue and the countries each a different color.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire*
    STRUGGLE FOR EAST-EUROPEAN EMPIRE: 1400-1700 The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire* HALİL İNALCIK The empire of the Golden Horde, built by Batu, son of Djodji and the grand son of Genghis Khan, around 1240, was an empire which united the whole East-Europe under its domination. The Golden Horde empire comprised ali of the remnants of the earlier nomadic peoples of Turkic language in the steppe area which were then known under the common name of Tatar within this new political framework. The Golden Horde ruled directly över the Eurasian steppe from Khwarezm to the Danube and över the Russian principalities in the forest zone indirectly as tribute-paying states. Already in the second half of the 13th century the western part of the steppe from the Don river to the Danube tended to become a separate political entity under the powerful emir Noghay. In the second half of the 14th century rival branches of the Djodjid dynasty, each supported by a group of the dissident clans, started a long struggle for the Ulugh-Yurd, the core of the empire in the lower itil (Volga) river, and for the title of Ulugh Khan which meant the supreme ruler of the empire. Toktamish Khan restored, for a short period, the unity of the empire. When defeated by Tamerlane, his sons and dependent clans resumed the struggle for the Ulugh-Khan-ship in the westem steppe area. During ali this period, the Crimean peninsula, separated from the steppe by a narrow isthmus, became a refuge area for the defeated in the steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends of Aquatic Alien Species Invasions in Ukraine
    Aquatic Invasions (2007) Volume 2, Issue 3: 215-242 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.3.8 Open Access © 2007 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2007 REABIC Research Article Trends of aquatic alien species invasions in Ukraine Boris Alexandrov1*, Alexandr Boltachev2, Taras Kharchenko3, Artiom Lyashenko3, Mikhail Son1, Piotr Tsarenko4 and Valeriy Zhukinsky3 1Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU); 37, Pushkinska St, 65125 Odessa, Ukraine 2Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas NASU; 2, Nakhimova avenue, 99011 Sevastopol, Ukraine 3Institute of Hydrobiology NASU; 12, Geroyiv Stalingrada avenue, 04210 Kiyv, Ukraine 4Institute of Botany NASU; 2, Tereschenkivska St, 01601 Kiyv, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] (BA), [email protected] (AB), [email protected] (TK, AL), [email protected] (PT) *Corresponding author Received: 13 November 2006 / Accepted: 2 August 2007 Abstract This review is a first attempt to summarize data on the records and distribution of 240 alien species in fresh water, brackish water and marine water areas of Ukraine, from unicellular algae up to fish. A checklist of alien species with their taxonomy, synonymy and with a complete bibliography of their first records is presented. Analysis of the main trends of alien species introduction, present ecological status, origin and pathways is considered. Key words: alien species, ballast water, Black Sea, distribution, invasion, Sea of Azov introduction of plants and animals to new areas Introduction increased over the ages. From the beginning of the 19th century, due to The range of organisms of different taxonomic rising technical progress, the influence of man groups varies with time, which can be attributed on nature has increased in geometrical to general processes of phylogenesis, to changes progression, gradually becoming comparable in in the contours of land and sea, forest and dimensions to climate impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey and Iraq: the Perils (And Prospects) of Proximity
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT I RAQ AND I TS N EIGHBORS Iraq’s neighbors are playing a major role—both positive and negative—in the stabilization and reconstruction of “the new Iraq.” As part of the Institute’s “Iraq and Henri J. Barkey Its Neighbors” project, a group of leading specialists on the geopolitics of the region and on the domestic politics of the individual countries is assessing the interests and influence of the countries surrounding Iraq. In addition, these specialists are examining how Turkey and Iraq the situation in Iraq is impacting U.S. bilateral relations with these countries. Henri Barkey’s report on Turkey is the first in a series of USIP special reports on “Iraq The Perils (and Prospects) of Proximity and Its Neighbors” to be published over the next few months. Next in the series will be a study on Iran by Geoffrey Kemp of the Nixon Center. The “Iraq and Its Neighbors” project is directed by Scott Lasensky of the Institute’s Research and Studies Program. For an overview of the topic, see Phebe Marr and Scott Lasensky, “An Opening at Sharm el-Sheikh,” Beirut Daily Star, November 20, 2004. Henri J. Barkey is the Bernard L. and Bertha F. Cohen Professor of international relations at Lehigh University. He served as a member of the U.S. State Department Policy Planning Staff (1998–2000), working primarily on issues related to the Middle East, the eastern Mediterranean, and intelligence matters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Tatars and Their Russian-Captive Slaves an Aspect of Muscovite-Crimean Relations in the 16Th and 17Th Centuries
    The Crimean Tatars and their Russian-Captive Slaves An Aspect of Muscovite-Crimean Relations in the 16th and 17th Centuries Eizo MATSUKI The Law Code of Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich (Ulozhenie), being formed of 25 chapters and divided into 976 articles, is the last and the most systematic codification of Muscovite Law in early modern Russia. It was compiled in 1649, that is more than one and a half centuries after Russia’s political “Independence” from Mongol-Tatar Rule. Chapter VIII of this Law Code, comprised of 7 articles and titled “The Redemption of Military Captives”, however, reveals that Muscovite Russia at the mid-17th century was yet suffering from frequent Tatar raids into its populated territory. The raids were to capture Russian people and sell them as slaves. Because of this situation, the Muscovite government was forced to create a special annual tax (poronianichnyi zbor) to prepare a financial fund needed for ransoming Russian captive-slaves from the Tatars.1 Chapter VIII, article 1 imposes an annual levy on the common people of all Russia: 8 dengi per household for town people as well as church peasants; 4 dengi for other peasants; and 2 dengi for lower service men. On the other hand, articles 2-7 of this chapter established norms for ransom-payment to the Tatars according to the rank of the Russian captives: for gentry (dvoriane) and lesser gentry (deti boiarskie) twenty rubles per 100 chetvert’ of their service land-estate (pomest’e); for lesser ranks such as Musketeers (strel’tsy),2 Cossacks, townspeople, and peasants a fixed payment from ten to forty rubles each.
    [Show full text]
  • International Crimes in Crimea
    International Crimes in Crimea: An Assessment of Two and a Half Years of Russian Occupation SEPTEMBER 2016 Contents I. Introduction 6 A. Executive summary 6 B. The authors 7 C. Sources of information and methodology of documentation 7 II. Factual Background 8 A. A brief history of the Crimean Peninsula 8 B. Euromaidan 12 C. The invasion of Crimea 15 D. Two and a half years of occupation and the war in Donbas 23 III. Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court 27 IV. Contextual elements of international crimes 28 A. War crimes 28 B. Crimes against humanity 34 V. Willful killing, murder and enforced disappearances 38 A. Overview 38 B. The law 38 C. Summary of the evidence 39 D. Documented cases 41 E. Analysis 45 F. Conclusion 45 VI. Torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 46 A. Overview 46 B. The law 46 C. Summary of the evidence 47 D. Documented cases of torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 50 E. Analysis 59 F. Conclusion 59 VII. Illegal detention 60 A. Overview 60 B. The law 60 C. Summary of the evidence 62 D. Documented cases of illegal detention 66 E. Analysis 87 F. Conclusion 87 VIII. Forced displacement 88 A. Overview 88 B. The law 88 C. Summary of evidence 90 D. Analysis 93 E. Conclusion 93 IX. Crimes against public, private and cultural property 94 A. Overview 94 B. The law 94 C. Summary of evidence 96 D. Documented cases 99 E. Analysis 110 F. Conclusion 110 X. Persecution and collective punishment 111 A. Overview 111 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Farmers from Across Europe Directly Descended from Neolithic Aegeans
    Early farmers from across Europe directly descended from Neolithic Aegeans Zuzana Hofmanováa,1, Susanne Kreutzera,1, Garrett Hellenthalb, Christian Sella, Yoan Diekmannb, David Díez-del-Molinob, Lucy van Dorpb, Saioa Lópezb, Athanasios Kousathanasc,d, Vivian Linkc,d, Karola Kirsanowa, Lara M. Cassidye, Rui Martinianoe, Melanie Strobela, Amelie Scheua,e, Kostas Kotsakisf, Paul Halsteadg, Sevi Triantaphyllouf, Nina Kyparissi-Apostolikah, Dushka Urem-Kotsoui, Christina Ziotaj, Fotini Adaktylouk, Shyamalika Gopalanl, Dean M. Bobol, Laura Winkelbacha, Jens Blöchera, Martina Unterländera, Christoph Leuenbergerm, Çiler Çilingiroglu˘ n, Barbara Horejso, Fokke Gerritsenp, Stephen J. Shennanq, Daniel G. Bradleye, Mathias Curratr, Krishna R. Veeramahl, Daniel Wegmannc,d, Mark G. Thomasb, Christina Papageorgopoulous,2, and Joachim Burgera,2 aPalaeogenetics Group, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany; bDepartment of Genetics, Evolution, and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; cDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland; dSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; eMolecular Population Genetics, Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; fFaculty of Philosophy, School of History and Archaeology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; gDepartment of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4ET, United Kingdom; hHonorary Ephor of Antiquities, Hellenic Ministry of Culture & Sports,
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Fennoscandian Genomes Reveal Origin and Spread of Siberian Ancestry in Europe
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07483-5 OPEN Ancient Fennoscandian genomes reveal origin and spread of Siberian ancestry in Europe Thiseas C. Lamnidis1, Kerttu Majander1,2,3, Choongwon Jeong1,4, Elina Salmela 1,3, Anna Wessman5, Vyacheslav Moiseyev6, Valery Khartanovich6, Oleg Balanovsky7,8,9, Matthias Ongyerth10, Antje Weihmann10, Antti Sajantila11, Janet Kelso 10, Svante Pääbo10, Päivi Onkamo3,12, Wolfgang Haak1, Johannes Krause 1 & Stephan Schiffels 1 1234567890():,; European population history has been shaped by migrations of people, and their subsequent admixture. Recently, ancient DNA has brought new insights into European migration events linked to the advent of agriculture, and possibly to the spread of Indo-European languages. However, little is known about the ancient population history of north-eastern Europe, in particular about populations speaking Uralic languages, such as Finns and Saami. Here we analyse ancient genomic data from 11 individuals from Finland and north-western Russia. We show that the genetic makeup of northern Europe was shaped by migrations from Siberia that began at least 3500 years ago. This Siberian ancestry was subsequently admixed into many modern populations in the region, particularly into populations speaking Uralic languages today. Additionally, we show that ancestors of modern Saami inhabited a larger territory during the Iron Age, which adds to the historical and linguistic information about the population history of Finland. 1 Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany. 2 Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany. 3 Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, PL 56 (Viikinkaari 9), 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Wartime Commercial Policy
    Planning for the Short Haul: The Formation of Wartime Commercial Policy Mariya Grinberg [email protected] Draft paper prepared for IPES, November 18, 2017. Please do not cite or circulate without permission of the author. In times of war, why do belligerents continue to trade with each other? There are two countervailing forces that affect this decision. On the one hand, conventional wisdom in economics holds that states have absolute gains from trade. Therefore, economic considerations should push states to engage in mutually beneficial trading relationships, regardless of the security environment. In other words, states should always trade with the enemy. On the other hand, conventional wisdom in international relations holds that trading with a security adversary has negative security externalities. A state can use these benefits from trade to increase its military capabilities which, in turn, can be used in the war effort against the state it is trading with. Thus according to security considerations, states should never trade with the enemy. Empirically, it is possible to see wide variation in the choices states make about their wartime commercial policy. Some states chose to continue their trade throughout the war, for example India and Pakistan in the Kargil War (1999) or Yugoslavia and Croatia in the War of Bosnian Independence (1992). Other states chose to cut off trade immediately at the start of the war, for example India and Pakistan in the Second Kashmir War (1965) or England and Argentina in the Falkland Islands War (1982). Yet other states start off trading with the enemy only to change course during the war and sever the commercial relationship in the middle of the conflict, as for example occurred in the Iran-Iraq War of 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • UHF Superturnstile Antennas Corr V2 Stand
    References UHF - Superturnstile Antennas installed by KATHREIN as it stands per February 2021 Country Station Power Country Station Power Austria Gaisberg 3 x 20 kW Denmark Hadsten 1 7 x 4.5 kW Jauerling 3 x 20 kW Hadsten 2 2 x 40 kW Lichtenberg 2 x 20 kW Hedensted 2 x 40 kW Schöckl 2 x 20 kW Jyderup 3 x 40 kW Kopenhagen 3 x 40 kW Belgium Egem 4 x 20 kW Nakskov 2 x 10 kW Genk 2 x 35 kW Nibe 1 7 x 4.5 kW Leglise Vlessart 3 x 10 kW Nibe 2 2 x 40 kW Schoten 3 x 20 kW Ro 2 x 40 kW Wavre 3 x 20 kW Svenborg 3 x 20 kW Tolne 2 x 10 kW Benin Banikoara 5 kW Tommerup 3 x 40 kW Bante 5 kW Viborg 1 7 x 4.5 kW Bassila 5 kW Viborg 2 2 x 40 kW Bembereke 5 kW Boukoumbe 5 kW Finland Videbaek 1 7 x 4.5 kW Kandi 5 kW Videbaek 2 2 x 40 kW Kouande 5 kW Vordingborg 1 7 x 4.5 kW Natitingou 5 kW Vordingborg 2 2 x 40 kW Tchaaourou 5 kW Ahvenanmaa 20 kW Äthäri 20 kW Brazil Bauru 5 kW Espoo 40 kW Belo Horizonte 15 kW Haapavesi 1 5 x 5 kW Blumenau 5 kW Haapavesi 2 5 x 5 kW Cabo Frio 7.5 kW Haapavesi 3 20 kW City of Manaus 7.5 kW Inari 2 x 40 kW Curitiba 7.5 kW Jisalmi 20 kW Florianopolis 7.5 kW Karigasn.
    [Show full text]
  • Up to Their Elbows in Blood: the Crimean War and The
    UP TO THEIR ELBOWS IN BLOOD: THE CRIMEAN WAR AND THE PROFESSIONALIZATION OF MEDICINE Fought in the mid-1850s, many scholars regard the Crimean War as largely insignificant. However in reality, the historical contributions of the war are important – particularly those contributions pertaining to medicine. This seemingly “unnecessary” war facilitated the modernization of Western medicine; methods used during and directly after the Crimean War were standard until World War Two. A brief history of the war reveals medical data that constitutes the bulk of my interpretation. The war’s specific medical achievements are highlighted throughout the essay. The findings in this paper are by no means conclusive, but they exhibit that it is important to look beyond Florence Nightingale, the war’s most famous and studied individual, and gaze upon the larger trends of medicine. Her story is covered in some detail in this paper, but she is not the sole source of innovation from this rather disastrous war. The professionalization of Western medicine stands out as one of the great accomplishments of this war, despite scholars viewing the war as useless. Key words: cholera epidemics, battlefield surgery, Florence Nightingale, Nikolay Pirogov, William Howard Russell, medical modernization Tyler Eaves HIST 586: Advanced Seminar in History May 11, 2017 Eaves 2 “It is good for us to be here”1 On the night of November 14, 1854, an exhausted woman penned a letter to a distant reader. By candlelight she scrawled in hurried script about the “appalling horror” surrounding her. “Steeped up to [their] necks in blood,” she and her helpers worked tirelessly upon men who “bear pain and mutilation with unshrinking heroism, and die or are cut up without a complaint.” Absences of brooms, soap, and towels only complicated the dire state of affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem of Environmental Remediation of the River Runoff of Basin Geosystem of the Small River Alma (Republic of Crimea)
    E3S Web of Conferences 210, 07007 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021007007 ITSE-2020 Problem of environmental remediation of the river runoff of basin geosystem of the small river Alma (Republic of Crimea) Tatiana Ivankova1,* 1South-Russian State Technical University, Novocherkassk Polytechnic Institute, Novocherkassk, Rostov Region, Russia Abstract. An assessment of the ecological state of the small river basin Alma of the Republic of Crimea has been carried out. Due to intensive nature management in the 20th century, the primary natural environment was transformed into a natural-engineering system (NES). The critical components of the NES are the lowland sector and surface waters basin. The flat sector turned into an agricultural landscape with a low coefficient of natural protection, it needs transformation based on landscape planning. Runoff the Alma River is almost completely regulated by reservoirs and ponds, as a result of which the channel is deprived of water for most of the year. It is proposed to restore the natural flow of the river by redistributing the reserves of the Partizansky reservoir and establishing Western European water consumption standards for Simferopol. 1 Introduction There are 2.5 million small rivers in Russia, they form almost half of the total river flow, about 45% of the urban dwellers live in their basins. Small rivers are not only an important source of water supply but also one of the most environmentally sensitive elements of the landscape sphere. Unlike larger watercourses, a small river is very closely related to the natural environment, and every change in the landscape of the catchment immediately affects its regime [1].
    [Show full text]