DOCSLIB.ORG

Homeownership and Housing Opportunities Through Innovative Partnerships and Initiatives That Build Healthy, Vibrant Communities Across the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Homeownership and Housing Opportunities Through Innovative Partnerships and Initiatives That Build Healthy, Vibrant Communities Across the United States THE URBAN INSTITUTE WASHINGTON, DC Housing in the Nation’s Capital Housing in the Nation’s 2003 F ANNIE MAE FOUNDATION Housing IN THE 4000 Wisconsin Avenue, NW North Tower, Suite One NATION’S CAPITAL Washington, DC 20016-2804 (202) 274-8000 www.fanniemaefoundation.org 2003 www.knowledgeplex.org FMF R 236 The Fannie Mae Foundation creates affordable homeownership and housing opportunities through innovative partnerships and initiatives that build healthy, vibrant communities across the United States. The Foundation is specially committed to improving the quality of life for the people of its hometown, Washington D.C., and to enhancing the livability of the city’s neighborhoods. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., the Foundation is a private, nonprofit organization whose sole source of support is Fannie Mae, and has regional offices in Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Pasadena, and Philadelphia. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS Franklin D. Raines Stewart Kwoh Stacey D. Stewart James H. Carr Chairman Director President and CEO Senior Vice President Financial Innovation, Stacey D. Stewart Robert J. Levin Glen S. Howard Planning, and Research President and CEO Treasurer and Director General Counsel and and Director Senior Vice President Kevin Smith William R. Maloni Senior Vice President Kenneth J. Bacon Director Beverly L. Barnes Finance and Administration Director Senior Vice President Daniel H. Mudd Communications Sheila F. Maith Floyd Flake Director Vice President Director Peter Beard Leadership and Practice John Sasso Senior Vice President Development Stephen Goldsmith Director Knowledge Access and Director Technology Strategy Rebecca R. Senhauser Jamie S. Gorelick Director Director H. Patrick Swygert Charles V. Greener Director Director Karen Hastie Williams Colleen Hernandez Director Director Barry Zigas Louis W. Hoyes Director Director Glen S. Howard Secretary © Fannie Mae Foundation 2003. All Rights Reserved. The Fannie Mae Foundation, through its publications and other programs, is committed to the full and fair exposition of issues related to affordable housing and community development. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Fannie Mae Foundation or its officers or directors. Housing IN THE NATION’S CAPITAL 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 CHAPTER 1 Introduction . 5 CHAPTER 2 Economic and Demographic Context . 8 CHAPTER 3 Housing Stock and Production . 17 CHAPTER 4 Homeownership Market . 25 CHAPTER 5 Rental Housing Market . 35 PREPARED FOR THE CHAPTER 6 FANNIE MAE FOUNDATION Low-Income Housing Needs and Resources . 43 BY THE URBAN INSTITUTE CHAPTER 7 Patterns of Concentrated Neighborhood Poverty. 51 MARGERY AUSTIN TURNER G. THOMAS KINGSLEY KATHRYN L. S. PETTIT AUTHORS . 56 CHRISTOPHER W. SNOW PETER A. TATIAN ENDNOTES . 56 ALISA WILSON REFERENCES. 58 APPENDIXES. 59 THE URBAN INSTITUTE WASHINGTON, DC ble of Contents Ta Featured Neighborhood Clusters SPOTLIGHTS The text highlights findings for neighborhood “clusters,” 16 areas defined by the District’s Office of Planning and made up of three to five neighborhoods. The text iden- tifies the cluster by the first neighborhood listed for that cluster, followed by the cluster number. A listing of the 19 neighborhoods in each cluster appears in Appendix A. 20 14 CHAPTER 2 Cathedral Heights (14). 12 2 15 22 Colonial Village (16) . 14 3 3 Near Southeast (27). 15 29 CHAPTER 3 30 Lamond Riggs (19) . 18 Douglass (38) . 21 Historic Anacostia (28). 22 27 CHAPTER 4 28 35 37 Howard University (3) . 26 38 North Michigan Park (20) . 27 Mayfair (30) . 29 CHAPTER 5 Cleveland Park (15) . 36 Fairfax Village (35) . 38 Eastland Gardens (29) . 39 CHAPTER 6 Sheridan (37) . 44 Brookland (22) . 46 Mount Pleasant (2) . 49 Housing in the Nation’s Capital 2003 Housing in the Nation’s ii FOREWORD With last year’s launch of Housing in the Nation’s Capital, This juxtaposition of progress and challenge is nowhere the Fannie Mae Foundation took aim at two goals. We more evident than in Washington, D.C.’s Congress wanted to provide policy makers, housing professionals, Heights neighborhood. Congress Heights stands as one and the public at large with a rich, textured portrait of of the city’s housing production leaders. It also ranked housing conditions in the Washington, D.C., metropol- among the city’s top neighborhoods in new rental itan area. And we wanted to supply the region with a housing construction during the 1990s and currently fact-fueled engine that could ignite and propel an has more planned housing units than all but one other ongoing dialogue on the housing challenges facing our neighborhood in the city. city and our region. But Congress Heights also faces serious challenges. The We succeeded. Demand for the first edition of Housing neighborhood is a city leader in housing code violations in the Nation’s Capital quickly exceeded our expecta- and household overcrowding among the poor. And in tions. The District government is using it to inform plan- Congress Heights, as in the District as a whole, concen- ning efforts. Local housing and community develop- trated poverty worsened during the decade. ment organizations are relying on the report to monitor The challenge now facing those committed to improv- affordable housing challenges. And local educators are ing the quality of life in the Washington, D.C., metro- using it to teach the next generation of housing and politan area is to build on the progress of distressed community development professionals. communities like Congress Heights. Meeting this chal- This second edition of Housing in the Nation’s Capital lenge will require a concerted effort in which public, builds on the first. It includes newly available data from private, and philanthropic organizations work together the most recent decennial census and a special chapter to produce the will—and the wallet—necessary for last- focusing on concentrated poverty. In addition, this ing, substantive change. year’s report places housing conditions in the The Fannie Mae Foundation is in the early stages of Washington, D.C., region in context by comparing leading just such an initiative. Guided by the voice of them with conditions in five other metropolitan areas. neighborhood residents and the data from Housing in This year’s Housing in the Nation’s Capital tells a story of the Nation’s Capital, the Foundation is aligning its remarkable housing market strength in the region and Congress Heights initiatives with those of our key part- particularly in the District. The city is experiencing its ners: the government of Washington, D.C., the East-of- most robust housing market in years, and there’s the-River Community Development Corporation, and renewed interest and new investment in once over- the Kimsey Foundation. looked inner-city neighborhoods. Together, we will demonstrate the value of concerted But the 2003 edition of Housing in the Nation’s Capital community development activities. We intend to work also offers compelling evidence that not all communities in partnership with Congress Heights residents to accel- are benefiting equally from the region’s prosperity. The erate the most promising trends and reverse the most metropolitan area has a large homeless population and disturbing trends outlined in Housing in the Nation’s a deficit of almost 40,000 housing units affordable to Capital. And we are confident that one day soon, the lowest income renters. One of the report’s most strik- Congress Heights will stand as an inspiration, as a mon- ing findings is the dramatic upsurge in the number of ument to neighborhood revitalization, and as a model District neighborhoods with extremely high poverty rates. for other communities throughout our city and throughout our nation. This trend set the District apart from the rest of the nation. While the number of District residents living in areas of extreme poverty more than tripled, the num- bers in the rest of the nation declined. This disturbing Stacey D. Stewart increase in concentrated poverty coincided with a decade President and CEO of exceptional economic growth. While prosperity Fannie Mae Foundation spread, the poorest of our citizens became poorer. oreword F iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank the Fannie Mae Foundation for pro- viding us with the ongoing opportunity to examine housing conditions and trends in our city and region. In particular, we thank Patrick Simmons, director of Housing Demography at the Fannie Mae Foundation, for his many contributions to the content, organization, and accuracy of this report. We also thank Jessica Cigna, Sandra Padilla, and Beata Bednarz of the Urban Institute, who assisted in data assembly and analysis as well as in the preparation of maps and graphs. In addi- tion, we wish to acknowledge the other funders that support the Urban Institute’s ongoing work to assem- ble and verify much of the information presented in this report: the Annie E. Casey Foundation, through the D.C. Data Warehouse, and the Rockefeller Found- ation, through the Neighborhood Change Database. Finally, we greatly appreciate the comments and sug- gestions provided by a group of advisors convened by the Fannie Mae Foundation. Of course, all errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the authors. The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Housing in the Nation’s Capital 2003 Housing in the Nation’s iv Housing IN THE EXECUTIVE NATION’S CAPITAL SUMMARY AGAINST THE backdrop of a national recession and anemic recovery, the Washington region’s economy remains resilient, and its housing boom has reached new heights. Employment in the metropolitan area fell between 2001 and 2002, but the decline was modest. And new housing construction, after a minor slowdown in 2001, bounced back last year to reach its highest level since 1988.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National China Garden Foundation
    MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, THE NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION, AND THE NATIONAL CHINA GARDEN FOUNDATION REGARDING THE NATIONAL CHINA GARDEN AT THE U.S. NATIONAL ARBORETUM, WASHINGTON, D.C. This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is made as of this 18th day of November 2016, by and among the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS), the District of Columbia State Historic Preservation Officer (DCSHPO), the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), and the National China Garden Foundation (NCGF), (referred to collectively herein as the “Parties” or “Signatories” or individually as a “Party” or “Signatory”) pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 16 U.S.C. §470f and its implementing regulations 36 CFR Part 800, and Section 110 of the NHPA, 16 U.S.C. § 470h-2. WHEREAS, the United States National Arboretum (USNA) is a research and education institution, public garden and living museum, whose mission is to enhance the economic, environmental, and aesthetic value of landscape plants through long-term, multidisciplinary research, conservation of genetic resources, and interpretative gardens and educational exhibits. Established in 1927, and opened to the public in 1959, the USNA is the only federally-funded arboretum in the United States and is open to the public free of charge; and, WHEREAS, the USNA, located at 3501 New York Avenue, NE, is owned by the United States government and under the administrative jurisdiction of the USDA’s ARS and occupies approximately 446 acres in Northeast Washington, DC and bound by Bladensburg Road on the west, New York Avenue on the north, and M Street on the south.
    [Show full text]
  • H/Benning Historic Architectural Survey
    H Street/Benning Road Streetcar Project Historic Architectural Survey Prepared for: District Department of Transportation Prepared by: Jeanne Barnes HDR Engineering, Inc. 2600 Park Tower Drive Suite 100 Vienna, VA 22180 FINAL SUBMITTAL April 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Project Background ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1. Overhead Catenary System ................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2. Car Barn Training Center ....................................................................................................... 4 1.1.3. Traction Power Sub‐Stations ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.4. Interim Western Destination ................................................................................................ 6 1.2. Regulatory Context ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1. DC Inventory of Historic Sites ............................................................................................... 7 1.2.2. National Register cof Histori Places ...................................................................................... 8 1.3. District of Columbia Preservation Process ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dc Homeowners' Property Taxes Remain Lowest in The
    An Affiliate of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 820 First Street NE, Suite 460 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 408-1080 Fax (202) 408-8173 www.dcfpi.org February 27, 2009 DC HOMEOWNERS’ PROPERTY TAXES REMAIN LOWEST IN THE REGION By Katie Kerstetter This week, District homeowners will receive their assessments for 2010 and their property tax bills for 2009. The new assessments are expected to decline modestly, after increasing significantly over the past several years. The new assessments won’t impact homeowners’ tax bills until next year, because this year’s bills are based on last year’s assessments. Yet even though 2009’s tax bills are based on a period when average assessments were rising, this analysis shows that property tax bills have decreased or risen only moderately for many homeowners in recent years. DC homeowners continue to enjoy the lowest average property tax bills in the region, largely due to property tax relief policies implemented in recent years. These policies include a Homestead Deduction1 increase from $30,000 to $67,500; a 10 percent cap on annual increases in taxable assessments; and an 11-cent property tax rate cut. The District also adopted a “calculated rate” provision that decreases the tax rate if property tax collections reach a certain target. As a result of these measures, most DC homeowners have seen their tax bills fall — or increase only modestly — over the past four years. In 2008, DC homeowners paid lower property taxes on average than homeowners in surrounding counties. Among homes with an average sales price of $500,000, DC homeowners paid an average tax of $2,725, compared to $3,504 in Montgomery County, $4,752 in PG County, and over $4,400 in Arlington and Fairfax counties.
    [Show full text]
  • International Business Guide
    WASHINGTON, DC INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS GUIDE Contents 1 Welcome Letter — Mayor Muriel Bowser 2 Welcome Letter — DC Chamber of Commerce President & CEO Vincent Orange 3 Introduction 5 Why Washington, DC? 6 A Powerful Economy Infographic8 Awards and Recognition 9 Washington, DC — Demographics 11 Washington, DC — Economy 12 Federal Government 12 Retail and Federal Contractors 13 Real Estate and Construction 12 Professional and Business Services 13 Higher Education and Healthcare 12 Technology and Innovation 13 Creative Economy 12 Hospitality and Tourism 15 Washington, DC — An Obvious Choice For International Companies 16 The District — Map 19 Washington, DC — Wards 25 Establishing A Business in Washington, DC 25 Business Registration 27 Office Space 27 Permits and Licenses 27 Business and Professional Services 27 Finding Talent 27 Small Business Services 27 Taxes 27 Employment-related Visas 29 Business Resources 31 Business Incentives and Assistance 32 DC Government by the Letter / Acknowledgements D C C H A M B E R O F C O M M E R C E Dear Investor: Washington, DC, is a thriving global marketplace. With one of the most educated workforces in the country, stable economic growth, established research institutions, and a business-friendly government, it is no surprise the District of Columbia has experienced significant growth and transformation over the past decade. I am excited to present you with the second edition of the Washington, DC International Business Guide. This book highlights specific business justifications for expanding into the nation’s capital and guides foreign companies on how to establish a presence in Washington, DC. In these pages, you will find background on our strongest business sectors, economic indicators, and foreign direct investment trends.
    [Show full text]
  • District Columbia
    PUBLIC EDUCATION FACILITIES MASTER PLAN for the Appendices B - I DISTRICT of COLUMBIA AYERS SAINT GROSS ARCHITECTS + PLANNERS | FIELDNG NAIR INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A: School Listing (See Master Plan) APPENDIX B: DCPS and Charter Schools Listing By Neighborhood Cluster ..................................... 1 APPENDIX C: Complete Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization Study ............................................... 7 APPENDIX D: Complete Population and Enrollment Forecast Study ............................................... 29 APPENDIX E: Demographic Analysis ................................................................................................ 51 APPENDIX F: Cluster Demographic Summary .................................................................................. 63 APPENDIX G: Complete Facility Condition, Quality and Efficacy Study ............................................ 157 APPENDIX H: DCPS Educational Facilities Effectiveness Instrument (EFEI) ...................................... 195 APPENDIX I: Neighborhood Attendance Participation .................................................................... 311 Cover Photograph: Capital City Public Charter School by Drew Angerer APPENDIX B: DCPS AND CHARTER SCHOOLS LISTING BY NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER Cluster Cluster Name DCPS Schools PCS Schools Number • Oyster-Adams Bilingual School (Adams) Kalorama Heights, Adams (Lower) 1 • Education Strengthens Families (Esf) PCS Morgan, Lanier Heights • H.D. Cooke Elementary School • Marie Reed Elementary School
    [Show full text]
  • Housing in the Nation's Capital
    Housing in the Nation’s2005 Capital Foreword . 2 About the Authors. 4 Acknowledgments. 4 Executive Summary . 5 Introduction. 12 Chapter 1 City Revitalization and Regional Context . 15 Chapter 2 Contrasts Across the District’s Neighborhoods . 20 Chapter 3 Homeownership Out of Reach. 29 Chapter 4 Narrowing Rental Options. 35 Chapter 5 Closing the Gap . 43 Endnotes . 53 References . 56 Appendices . 57 Prepared for the Fannie Mae Foundation by the Urban Institute Margery Austin Turner G. Thomas Kingsley Kathryn L. S. Pettit Jessica Cigna Michael Eiseman HOUSING IN THE NATION’S CAPITAL 2005 Foreword Last year’s Housing in the Nation’s Capital These trends provide cause for celebration. adopted a regional perspective to illuminate the The District stands at the center of what is housing affordability challenges confronting arguably the nation’s strongest regional econ- Washington, D.C. The report showed that the omy, and the city’s housing market is sizzling. region’s strong but geographically unbalanced But these facts mask a much more somber growth is fueling sprawl, degrading the envi- reality, one of mounting hardship and declining ronment, and — most ominously — straining opportunity for many District families. Home the capacity of working families to find homes price escalation is squeezing families — espe- they can afford. The report provided a portrait cially minority and working families — out of of a region under stress, struggling against the city’s housing market. Between 2000 and forces with the potential to do real harm to 2003, the share of minority home buyers in the the quality of life throughout the Washington District fell from 43 percent to 37 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • DC Kids Count E-Databook
    DC ACTION FOR CHILDREN DC KIDS COUNT e-Databook “People I meet... the effect upon me of my early life... of the ward and city I live in... of the nation” —Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass Every city has many identities, depending on But Washington, aka DC, is also simply a who you ask. A legislator, a police officer, a hometown, where many people live their daily coach or a clerk might describe the same lives, raise their children and create community city’s people, culture and reputation in starkly and the future together. different terms. Washington is home to 100,000 children We are the nation’s capital, the official under 18. They are one in six DC residents. Washington that so many politicians run The number of children under the age of 5 has campaigns against. We are an international started to grow again after almost a decade of center of power, featuring stately embassies and decline.1 serving as the temporary home to diplomats. This DC KIDS COUNT e-databook is for and For some Americans, Washington is a code about them. word for the bubble where politicians hobnob with “fat cats,” bureaucrats operate and media Why Place Matters in the Lives of swarm over the latest scandal. Children (and Families) For some Americans, Washington is a place to Children grow up (and families live) in specific visit with their children to learn about history, places: neighborhoods. How well these read the original Declaration of Independence, neighborhoods are doing affects how well the stand on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and children and their families who live in them are 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homebuyer's Field Guide to Washington Architecture
    T H E HOMEBUYER’S F IE L D G U I D E T O W A S H I N G T O N ARCHITECTURE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Can you tell a Wardman from a Federal? By Marisa M. Kashino * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * & * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Wondering which neighborhoods are full of * * * * * * * * * Amanda Kolson Hurley * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Craftsmans or Colonials or midcentury moderns? * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WASHINGTONIAN * * * * * * * * * Here’s a tour of the region’s housing stock— * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APRIL * * * * * * * * * 2020 * * * * * * * * * whether you’re shopping for real estate * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * or just curious about the city around you. PAGE * * * * * * * * * 75 BEAUX ARTS VICTORIAN Often feature turrets and/or towers Prominent front-facing gable Neoclassical influences, such Facade as columns is often light-colored stone Wrap-around porch Decorative quoins WHERE YOU’VE SEEN ONE ONSCREEN: remind you of the marble monuments lining the Mall: Paris’s joined the Trump administration. WHERE YOU’VE SEEN ONE ONSCREEN: the century’s upper middle class, more was more: A single into the branding: Streets were named The mansion in the ’60s sitcom The École des Beaux-Arts had a major influence on both. Its The houses are often made of light- The inn where Bill Murray stayed (and house might have turrets and towers, ornamented gables, after trees (Maple, Cedar, Holly), and Beverly Hillbillies. (Lachlan Murdoch alumni informed the City Beautiful urban-planning move- colored stone, with decorative flour- stayed and stayed) in Groundhog Day. and gingerbread detailing. Around Washington, Victorian advertisements billed the town as “the bought the house in real life in 2019.) ment, which fueled the development of the monumental ishes such as columns, arched win- neighborhoods are great examples of early transit-oriented sylvan suburb.” Though its first resi- core in the early 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Application
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Regist er Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Kingman Park Historic District________________________________ Other names/site number: ______________________________________ Name of related multip le property listing: Spingarn, Browne, Young, Phelps Educational Campus; Spingarn High School; Langston Golf Course and Langston Dwellings ______________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: Western Boundary Line is 200-800 Blk 19th Street NE; Eastern Boundary Line is the Anacostia River along Oklahoma Avenue NE; Northern Boundary Line is 19th- 22nd Street & Maryland Avenue NE; Southern Boundary Line is East Capitol Street at 19th- 22nd Street NE. City or town: Washington, DC__________ State: ____DC________ County: ____________ Not For Publicatio n: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Washington, D.C.'S Neighborhoods A-3
    State of Washington, D.C.’s Neighborhoods Prepared by Peter A. Tatian G. Thomas Kingsley Margery Austin Turner Jennifer Comey Randy Rosso Prepared for The Office of Planning The Government of the District of Columbia September 30, 2008 The Urban Institute 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 UI project no. 08040-000-01 State of Washington, D.C.’s Neighborhoods ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments............................................................................................. vi About this Report ............................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction...................................................................................................... 3 II. Demographics................................................................................................. 9 Population......................................................................................................................9 Households..................................................................................................................13 III. Economy – Jobs and Income ..................................................................... 15 Employed Residents and Unemployment Rate...........................................................15 Poverty and Household Income ..................................................................................18 Public Assistance
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Amendments to the District Elements of the Comprehensive Plan JUNE 2017
    POLICY MEMO: Proposed Amendments to the District Elements of the Comprehensive Plan JUNE 2017 www.anacostiaparkcommunity.org ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document reflects the work of several organizations and individuals. The policy recommendations and proposed amendments to the District Elements of the Comprehensive Plan included in this document are supported by all of the members of the Anacostia Park and Community Collaborative which include: Anacostia Business Improvement District Anacostia Coordinating Council Anacostia Waterfront Trust Clean Water Action Community Preservation and Development Corporation DC Appleseed DC Promise Neighborhood Initiative East River Family Strengthening Collaborative Far Southeast Family Strengthening Collaborative Friends of Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens Groundswell Groundwork Anacostia River DC Institute for Public Health Innovation Neighborhood Legal Services Program Policy Innovation Lab at the McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University Progressive National Baptist Convention Inc. Urban Institute Ward 7 Business Partnership Special thanks to the individuals who led this effort: Erin Garnaas-Holmes, Anacostia Waterfront Trust Kevin Hilgers, DC Appleseed Art Slater, Anacostia Coordinating Council Michael Bochynski, Clean Water Action Additional thanks to the staff of the Office of Planning who provided APACC information about the amendment process: Tracy Gabriel Erkin Ozberk Tanya Stern Deborah Crain-Kemp Evelyn Kasongo 2 APACC | Policy Memo: Proposed Amendments to the District Elements of the Comprehensive
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia State Code: DC
    NCHS Instruction Manual Part 8A, Vital Records Geographic Classification, 2004 II. States, U. S. Territories, and Canadian Provinces. FIPS Place Listing State Name: District of Columbia State Code: DC NOTE: an asterisk in front of a place name indicates that this is a place of less than 10,000 population. Place Name Place County Name County Class Code Code Code Anacostia 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Anacostia Junction 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Barnaby Terrace 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Barnaby Woods 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Bellevue 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Benning 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Benning Heights 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Blue Plains 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Brightwood 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Brightwood Park 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Brookland 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Burleith 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Capitol View 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Chillum Station 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Cleveland Park 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Colonial Village 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Columbia Heights 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Congress Heights 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Congress Park 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Deanwood 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Dougalass Dwellings 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Eckington 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Fairfax Village 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Fort Lincoln New Town 50000 District of Columbia 001 U4 Foxhall Village 50000 District of Columbia 001
    [Show full text]