3.8 Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plant Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences – T, E & S Plants 3.8 THREATENED, ENDANGERED AND SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES 3.8.1 SCOPE OF THE ANALYSIS AND ANALYSIS METHODS An evaluation of threatened, endangered, and sensitive list plant species for the Trapper Bunkhouse Project Area was conducted. There is one federally listed threatened plant species in the state of Montana that occurs on National Forest Lands. Water howellia (Howellia aquatilis) was listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on July 14, 1994. This species is not known to occur on the Bitterroot NF. There are no known endangered plant species on the Bitterroot NF, and none suspected to occur. The Northern Region Sensitive Plant Species List (USDA Forest Service 2004a) identifies a number of plants for each National Forest for which population viability is a concern. This list includes 33 plant species on the Bitterroot NF. A review of the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MNHP) database and past Bitterroot National Forest plant surveys for known locations of sensitive plants within the project are was performed. Surveys had been conducted by Forest botanists and biological technicians as part of the Spoon-McCoy Salvage and Underburn, Huck-Trap Environmental Assessment (1994) and the Fern Creek Environmental Assessment (1995). Field surveys in the Trapper Bunkhouse Project Area in locations not previously surveyed were conducted in the summers of 2005 and 2006 by Bitterroot NF field botanists for the following species. Follow- up surveys of additional units, as well as proposed temporary roads and helicopter landings, were surveyed during the summer of 2007. The Project Area was also assessed for inclusion of habitat that might be suitable for other sensitive plant species by reviewing timber stand data and aerial photo interpretation. A list of sensitive plant species either known to occur in or near the Project Area or that have the potential to occur in the Trapper Bunkhouse Project Area is displayed in Table 3.8-1. Table 3.8- 1: Sensitive Plants Common Name Scientific Name Tapertip onion Allium acuminatum Dwarf onions Allium parvum Sandweed Athysanus pusillus Rocky Mountain paintbrush Castilleja covilleana Yellow lady's-slipper Cypripedium parviflorum Giant helleborine Epipactis gigantea Western boneset Eupatorium occidentale Spiny greenbush Glossopetalon nevadense Puzzling halimolobos Halimolobos perplexa Idaho goldenweed Haplopappus aberrans Western pearl-flower Heterocodon rariflorum Scalepod Idahoa scapigera Dwarf purple monkeyflower Mimulus nanus Turkey-peas Orogenia fusiformis Lemhi penstemon Penstemon lemhiensis Payette penstemon Penstemon payettensis Woolly-head clover Trifolium eriocephalum Hollyleaf clover Trifolium gymnocarpon California false hellebore Veratrum californicum 3.8 - 2 Trapper Bunkhouse Land Stewardship Project Final EIS Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences – T, E & S Plants Three sensitive plant species were found within the Project Area: dwarf onion (Allium parvum), Lemhi penstemon (Penstemon lemhiensis) and sandweed (Athysanus pusillus). In addition, four species of interest on the Forest were found: candystick (Allotropa virgata), Columbia lewisia (Lewisia columbiana), Yerba buena (Satureja douglasii) and bitterroot (Lewisia rediviva). An evaluation of the possible effects from management activities was conducted for these species and their habitat. The effects of proposed management activities on sensitive plant species were assessed by evaluating impacts to population numbers, habitat and population viability of these species at several geographic scales: 1) global range; 2) statewide range; 3) on the Bitterroot National Forest and; 4) within the Project Area. Information on individual species, their habitat, distribution and known occurrences within the state come from the Montana Natural Heritage Program. There is little, if any, information on the distribution of these species historically so cumulative effects are based on knowledge about habitat and similar species within the genus. More current information comes from monitoring sensitive plant populations for effects of management activities and wildfires. 3.8.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The Endangered Species Act requires that the Forest Service conserve endangered and threatened species. The National Forest Management Act and Forest Service policy direct that National Forests be managed to maintain populations of all existing native plant and animal species at or above minimum population levels. A minimum viable population consists of the number of individuals adequately distributed throughout their range necessary to perpetuate the existence of the species in natural, genetically stable, self-sustaining populations. Plant species for which population viability is a concern are identified by the Forest Service as sensitive species. This category may include federal candidates (plants being studied by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for proposed listing as threatened or endangered status), or plant species proposed for listing as threatened or endangered in the Federal Register (MNHP 2006). Sensitive species can also be species that are considered rare within the state of Montana or otherwise potentially of concern as determined by the Montana Natural Heritage Program. The Forest Service Manual requires that activities conducted on National Forests be reviewed for possible impacts on endangered, threatened, or sensitive species (FSM 2670). The Biological Evaluation (BE) consists of the written narrative below and the signed table located at the end of Section 3.8.4.D. It is also located in the Project File (PF-SENS-062). 3.8.3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT The Tin Cup Fire, which occurred in August 2007, burned into the northern part of the Trapper-Bunkhouse Project Area. The fire burned into unit 26 (a commercial thinning unit proposed in Alternative 2 in the DEIS). Burn severity was light-to-moderate, with some higher severity patches in the southeast corner. A. Sensitive Plant Species Lemhi Penstemon (Penstemon lemhiensis) Lemhi penstemon is found on open, east to southwest facing slopes in grasslands and open ponderosa pine or Douglas-fir and can be associated with big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata var. vasseyana) and bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata). It is a regional endemic, found only in southwestern Montana and adjacent Lemhi County, Idaho. Elevations range from 3200-8100 feet (Elzinga 1997). There are 90 known occurrences in Montana, 26 of which are located on the Bitterroot National Forest, two of these within the Trapper Bunkhouse Project Area. Many populations are small, only six on the Bitterroot Forest have over 100 individuals. It is theorized that Lemhi penstemon may be a recently evolved hybrid species, which is why it can occupy a variety of habitats. Spotted knapweed (Centaurea biebertsteinii {C. maculosa}) is a threat on most of the Lemhi Trapper Bunkhouse Land Stewardship Project Final EIS 3.8 - 3 Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences – T, E & S Plants penstemon sites on the Bitterroot Forest, particularly in areas that burned, creating a concern for management of the species, since fire appears to be critical to its survival. Monitoring of three Lemhi penstemon populations in Beaverhead County over a six-year period has demonstrated that population trends are closely tied to the existence of a seed bank (Heidel and Shelly 2001). Seeds appear to remain viable for at least six years and germination occurs during years of high moisture and disturbances such as fire. This determination appears to be in accord with recent monitoring on the Bitterroot NF. Botanists here have noted an increase in Lemhi penstemon on a monitoring site during the wet summers of 1993 and 1995, and another population that burned in the 2000 fires had hundreds of seedlings germinating for up to three years after the fire (USDA Forest Service 2003b). The Montana Natural Heritage Program ranks Lemhi penstemon as G3/S2, which means that the species is potentially at risk globally and at risk in Montana due to limited occurrences and vulnerability to extirpation in the state. A conservation strategy for Lemhi penstemon was prepared in 1997 and lists threats to the species from grazing, mining, road maintenance and reconstruction, timber harvest, noxious weed encroachment, herbicide application, fire suppression, interaction of weed infestation and prescribed fire, and small population sizes (Elzinga 1997). There are two populations of Lemhi penstemon in the Trapper Bunkhouse Project Area, one of these is in the Little Trapper Creek drainage, outside any unit boundaries; and the other is located in the Trapper Creek drainage with one plant within unit 15. The Little Trapper Creek population was originally found in 1995 and has been visually monitored every few years since then. There have been up to 43 individuals in the population, but only one basal rosette was located in 2005. The Trapper Creek population was discovered during surveys the summer of 2005 and consisted of only three plants. Dwarf Onion (Allium parvum) Dwarf onion is associated with grasslands, sagebrush and large open areas in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), usually in exposed sites with sandy or gravelly soil. Bitterroots (Lewisia rediviva) are found in similar habitat and the two species may be seen growing together. The greatest threat to dwarf onion plants and habitat is spotted knapweed encroachment, along with other weeds - like cheatgrass and sulfur cinquefoil - that are often
Recommended publications
  • Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O

    Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O

    ALPLAINS 2013 SEED CATALOG P.O. BOX 489, KIOWA, CO 80117-0489, U.S.A. Three ways to contact us: FAX: (303) 621-2864 (24 HRS.) email: [email protected] website: www.alplains.com Dear Growing Friends: Welcome to our 23rd annual seed catalog! The summer of 2012 was long, hot and brutal, with drought afflicting most of the U.S. Most of my botanical explorations were restricted to Idaho, Wash- ington, Oregon and northern California but even there moisture was below average. In a year like this, seeps, swales, springs, vestigial snowbanks and localized rainstorms became much more important in my search for seeding plants. On the Snake River Plains of southern Idaho and the scab- lands of eastern Washington, early bloomers such as Viola beckwithii, V. trinervata, Ranunculus glaberrimus, Ranunculus andersonii, Fritillaria pudica and Primula cusickiana put on quite a show in mid-April but many populations could not set seed. In northern Idaho, Erythronium idahoense flowered extensively, whole meadows were covered with thousands of the creamy, pendant blossoms. One of my most satisfying finds in the Hells Canyon area had to be Sedum valens. The tiny glaucous rosettes, surround- ed by a ring of red leaves, are a succulent connoisseur’s dream. Higher up, the brilliant blue spikes of Synthyris missurica punctuated the canyon walls. In southern Oregon, the brilliant red spikes of Pedicularis densiflora lit up the Siskiyou forest floor. Further north in Oregon, large populations of Erythronium elegans, Erythronium oregonum ssp. leucandrum, Erythro- nium revolutum, trilliums and sedums provided wonderful picture-taking opportunities. Eriogonum species did well despite the drought, many of them true xerics.
  • Landscaping with Native Plants by Stephen L

    Landscaping with Native Plants by Stephen L

    SHORT-SEASON, HIGH-ALTITUDE GARDENING BULLETIN 862 Landscaping with native plants by Stephen L. Love, Kathy Noble, Jo Ann Robbins, Bob Wilson, and Tony McCammon INTRODUCTION There are many reasons to consider a native plant landscape in Idaho’s short- season, high-altitude regions, including water savings, decreased mainte- nance, healthy and adapted plants, and a desire to create a local theme CONTENTS around your home. Most plants sold for landscaping are native to the eastern Introduction . 1 United States and the moist climates of Europe. They require acid soils, con- The concept of native . 3 stant moisture, and humid air to survive and remain attractive. Most also Landscaping Principles for Native Plant Gardens . 3 require a longer growing season than we have available in the harshest cli- Establishing Native Landscapes and Gardens . 4 mates of Idaho. Choosing to landscape with these unadapted plants means Designing a Dry High-Desert Landscape . 5 Designing a Modified High-Desert Landscape . 6 accepting the work and problems of constantly recreating a suitable artificial Designing a High-Elevation Mountain Landscape . 6 environment. Native plants will help create a landscape that is more “com- Designing a Northern Idaho Mountain/Valley fortable” in the climates and soils that surround us, and will reduce the Landscape . 8 resources necessary to maintain the landscape. Finding Sources of Native Plants . 21 The single major factor that influences Idaho’s short-season, high-altitude climates is limited summer moisture. Snow and rainfall are relatively abun- dant in the winter, but for 3 to 4 months beginning in June, we receive only a YOU ARE A SHORT-SEASON, few inches of rain.
  • A Simple Gis Approach to Predicting Rare Plant Habitat: North Central Rocky Mountains, United States Forest Service, Region One

    A Simple Gis Approach to Predicting Rare Plant Habitat: North Central Rocky Mountains, United States Forest Service, Region One

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE Erin Elizabeth Nock The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Nock, Erin Elizabeth, "A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE" (2008). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 37. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE By Erin Elizabeth Nock Bachelor of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2002 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography, GIS/Cartography The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2008 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Anna Klene, Chair Department of Geography Dr. David Shively, Member Department of Geography Susan Rinehart, Outside Member United States Forest Service ii Nock, Erin, M.A., Spring 2008 Geography A Simple GIS Approach to Predicting Rare Plant Habitat: North Central Rocky Mountains, United States Forest Service, Region One Chairperson: Dr.
  • A Comparative Study of the Allium Obtusum Comples

    A Comparative Study of the Allium Obtusum Comples

    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1983 A comparative study of the Allium obtusum comples William R. Mortola University of the Pacific Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mortola, William R.. (1983). A comparative study of the Allium obtusum comples. University of the Pacific, Thesis. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/2096 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ALLIUM OBTUSUM COMPLEX A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of the Pacific In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by William R. Mortola May 1983 This dissertation, written and submitted by Willi§m Richard Mortola is approved for recommendation to the Committee on Graduate Studies, University of the Pacific Dean of the School or Department Chairman: Dissertation Committee: Chairman •;=- J i i' ACKNOWLEDGMENTS t4uch gratitude is expressed to Dr, Dale 'II, McNeal for suggesting the problem investigated and for his par­ ticipation and supervision during all phases of this in­ vestigation, To Dr. Alice Hunter I am indebted for her reading of the manuscript and her identification of the insects collected during this study. To Dr, Steve Ander­ son I would like to extend appreciation for his reading of the manuscript and for making valuable suggestions.
  • Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County

    Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County

    A PPENDIX II Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX II. Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County Family Scientific Name Common Name FERN AND FERN ALLIES Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken family Pteridium aquilinum var.pubescens Bracken fern Dryopteridaceae Wood fern family Athyrium alpestre var. americanum Alpine lady fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Lady fern Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Cliff sword fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricate sword fern Polystichum kruckebergii Kruckeberg’s hollyfern Polystichum lonchitis Northern hollyfern Polystichum munitum Sword fern Equisetaceae Horsetail family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Scouring rush Equisetum laevigatum Smooth horsetail Isoetaceae Quillwort family Isoetes bolanderi Bolander’s quillwort Isoetes howellii Howell’s quillwort Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort Lycopodiaceae Club-moss family Lycopodiella inundata Bog club-moss Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita ssp. vestita Water clover Pilularia americana American pillwort Ophioglossaceae Adder’s-tongue family Botrychium multifidum Leathery grapefern Polypodiaceae Polypody family Polypodium hesperium Western polypody Pteridaceae Brake family Adiantum aleuticum Five-finger maidenhair Adiantum jordanii Common maidenhair fern Aspidotis densa Indian’s dream Cheilanthes cooperae Cooper’s
  • Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var

    Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var

    Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Cicuta douglasii poison parsnip 3 3 3 Cymopterus cinerarius alpine cymopterus 3 Cymopterus terebinthinus var. terebinth pteryxia 3 3 petraeus Ligusticum grayi Gray’s lovage 3 Lomatium dissectum fern-leaf 3 3 3 3 var. multifidum lomatium Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. desert biscuitroot 3 fimbriatum Plant List Lomatium mohavense Mojave parsley 3 3 Lomatium nevadense Nevada parsley 3 var. nevadense Lomatium rigidum prickly parsley 3 Taxonomy and nomenclature in this species list are based on Lomatium torreyi Sierra biscuitroot 3 western sweet- the Jepson Manual Online as of February 2011. Changes in Osmorhiza occidentalis 3 3 ADOXACEAE–ASTERACEAE cicely taxonomy and nomenclature are ongoing. Some site lists are Perideridia bolanderi Bolander’s 3 3 more complete than others; all of them should be considered a ssp. bolanderi yampah Lemmon’s work in progress. Species not native to California are designated Perideridia lemmonii 3 yampah with an asterisk (*). Please visit the Inyo National Forest and Perideridia parishii ssp. Parish’s yampah 3 3 Bureau of Land Management Bishop Resource Area websites latifolia for periodic updates. Podistera nevadensis Sierra podistera 3 Sphenosciadium ranger’s buttons 3 3 3 3 3 capitellatum APOCYNACEAE Dogbane Apocynum spreading 3 3 androsaemifolium dogbane Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Apocynum cannabinum hemp 3 3 ADOXACEAE Muskroot Humboldt Asclepias cryptoceras 3 Sambucus nigra ssp.
  • Biological Evaluation Sensitive Plants and Fungi Tahoe National Forest American River Ranger District Big Hope Fire Salvage and Restoration Project

    Biological Evaluation Sensitive Plants and Fungi Tahoe National Forest American River Ranger District Big Hope Fire Salvage and Restoration Project

    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION SENSITIVE PLANTS AND FUNGI TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST AMERICAN RIVER RANGER DISTRICT BIG HOPE FIRE SALVAGE AND RESTORATION PROJECT Prepared by: KATHY VAN ZUUK Plant Ecologist/Botanist TNF Nonnative Invasive Plant Coordinator February 27, 2014 A Portion of the American Wildfire Area along Foresthill Divide Road 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page Executive Summary 4 Introduction 6 Consultation to Date 6 Current Management Direction 8 Alternative Descriptions 9 Existing Environment 11 Description of Affected Sensitive Species Habitat Effects Analysis and 20 Determinations Reasonably Foreseeable Actions/Time Frames for the Analysis/ List of 20 Assumptions Effects to Species without potential habitat in the Project Area 22 • Lemmon’s milk-vetch, Astragalus lemmonii 22 • Modoc Plateau milk-vetch, Astragalus pulsiferae var. coronensis 22 • Sierra Valley Ivesia, Ivesia aperta var. aperta 22 • Dog Valley Ivesia, Ivesia aperta var. canina 23 • Plumas Ivesia, Ivesia sericoleuca 23 • Webber’s Ivesia, Ivesia webberi 23 • Wet-cliff Lewisia, Lewisia cantelovii 24 • Long-petaled Lewisia, Lewisia longipetala 24 • Follett’s mint, Monardella follettii 24 • Layne’s butterweed, Packera layneae 24 • White bark pine, Pinus albicaulis 25 • Sticky Pyrrocoma, Pyrrocoma lucida 25 Effects to Species with potential habitat in the Project Area 26 • Webber’s Milkvetch, Astragalus webberi 26 • Carson Range rock cress, Boechera rigidissima var. demota 27 • Triangle-lobe moonwort, Botrychium ascendens 27 • Scalloped moonwort, Botrychium crenulatum 27 • Common moonwort, Botrychium lunaria 27 • Mingan moonwort, Botrychium minganense 27 • Mountain moonwort, Botrychium montanum 28 • Bolander’s candle moss, Bruchia bolanderi 29 • Clustered Lady’s Slipper Orchid, Cypripedium fasciculatum 29 • Mountain Lady’s Slipper Orchid, Cypripedium montanum 30 • Starved Daisy, Erigeron miser 31 • Donner Pass Buckwheat, Eriogonum umbellatum var.
  • FREMONTIA a Journal of the California Native Plant Society FREMONTIA Vol

    FREMONTIA a Journal of the California Native Plant Society FREMONTIA Vol

    Vol. 25, No. 1 January 1997 FREMONTIA A Journal of the California Native Plant Society FREMONTIA Vol. 25 No. 1 January 1997 Copyright © 1997 California Native Plant Society Phyllis M. Faber, Editor • Laurence J. Hyraan, Art Director • Beth Hansen, Designer California Native Plant Society Dedicated to the Preservation of the California Native Flora The California Native Plant Society is an organization of lay­ educational work includes: publication of a quarterly journal, men and professionals united by an interest in the plants of Cali­ Fremontia, and a quarterly Bulletin which gives news and fornia. It is open to all. Its principal aims are to preserve the native announcements of Society events and conservation issues. flora and to add to the knowledge of members and the public at Chapters hold meetings, field trips, plant and poster sales. Non- large. It seeks to accomplish the former goal in a number of ways: members are welcome to attend. by monitoring rare and endangered plants throughout the state; by The work of the Society is done mostly by volunteers. Money acting to save endangered areas through publicity, persuasion, and is provided by the dues of members and by funds raised by on occasion, legal action; by providing expert testimony to chapter plant and poster sales. Additional donations, bequests, government bodies; and by supporting financially and otherwise and memorial gifts from friends of the Society can assist greatly the establishment of native plant preserves. Much of this work is in carrying forward the work of the Society. Dues and donations done through CNPS Chapters throughout the state.
  • Ruby Pipeline Project

    Ruby Pipeline Project

    BLM Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-0000-2013-0001-EIS Ruby Pipeline Project Office NevadaState November 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Nevada State Office Reno, Nevada FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DOI-BLM-NV-0000-2013-0001-EIS Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Nevada State Office, Reno, Nevada Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Forest Service, Fremont-Winema National Forest Nevada Department of Wildlife Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Wyoming Game and Fish Department Project Location: Lincoln & Uinta Counties, WY Box Elder, Cache & Rich Counties, UT Elko, Humboldt & Washoe Counties, NV Lake & Klamath Counties, OR Abstract: This Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Ruby Pipeline Project was prepared by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in response to a ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (case nos. 10-72356, 10-72552, 10-72762, 10-72768, and 10-72775). The ruling directed the BLM to undertake a revised cumulative effects analysis of the Ruby Pipeline Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) as it related to the cumulative loss of sagebrush steppe vegetation and habitat. This Final SEIS contains supplemental information about the original and present condition of the sagebrush steppe vegetation and habitat, and analyzes the cumulative impacts of the Ruby Pipeline Project based on the supplemental information and comments on the Draft SEIS from interested
  • Perspectives from Montiaceae (Portulacineae) Evolution. II

    Perspectives from Montiaceae (Portulacineae) Evolution. II

    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 2 October 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201809.0566.v1 Hershkovitz Montiaceae Ecological Evolution 1 Perspectives from Montiaceae (Portulacineae) evolution. II. Ecological evolution, phylogenetic comparative 2 analysis, and the Principle of Evolutionary Idiosyncraticity 3 4 5 Mark A. Hershkovitz1 6 1Santiago, Chile 7 [email protected] 8 9 10 ABSTRACT 11 12 The present paper reviews evidence for ecological evolution of Montiaceae. Montiaceae 13 (Portulacineae) comprise a family of ca. 275 species and ca. 25 subspecific taxa of flowering plants 14 distributed mainly in extreme western America, with additional endemism elsewhere, including other 15 continents and islands. They have diversified repeatedly across steep ecological gradients. Based on narrative 16 analysis, I argue that phylogenetic transitions from annual to perennial life history have been more frequent 17 than suggested by computational phylogenetic reconstructions. I suggest that a reported phylogenetic 18 correlation between the evolution of life history and temperature niche is coincidental and not causal. I 19 demonstrate how statistical phylogenetic comparative analysis (PhCA) missed evidence for marked moisture 20 niche diversification among Montiaceae. I discount PhCA evidence for the relation between Montiaceae 21 genome duplication and ecological diversification. Based on the present analysis of Montiaceae evolution, I 22 criticize the premise of the prevalent statistical approach to PhCA, which tests Darwinian
  • Scientific [Common] Lewisia Sacajaweana – BL Wilson & E

    Scientific [Common] Lewisia Sacajaweana – BL Wilson & E

    SPECIES: Scientific [common] Lewisia sacajaweana – B. L. Wilson & E. Rey- Vizgirdas [Sacajawea’s Bitter-Root] Forest: Salmon–Challis National Forest Forest Reviewer: Brittni Brown; John Proctor Date of Review: 15 February 2018; 13 March 2018 Forest concurrence (or YES recommendation if new) for inclusion of species on list of potential SCC: (Enter Yes or No) FOREST REVIEW RESULTS: 1. The Forest concurs or recommends the species for inclusion on the list of potential SCC: Yes_X__ No___ 2. Rationale for not concurring is based on (check all that apply): Species is not native to the plan area _______ Species is not known to occur in the plan area _______ Species persistence in the plan area is not of substantial concern _______ FOREST REVIEW INFORMATION: 1. Is the Species Native to the Plan Area? Yes _X_ No___ If no, provide explanation and stop assessment. 2. Is the Species Known to Occur within the Planning Area? Yes _X _ No___ If no, stop assessment. Table 1. All Known Occurrences, Years, and Frequency within the Planning Area Year Number of Location of Observations (USFS Source of Information Observed Individuals District, Town, River, Road Intersection, HUC, etc.) July 31, 267 total North Fork Ranger District IDFG Element Occurrence EO 1990 individuals Bighorn Crags, along the Crags Number: 4 (4 Trail (FS Trail 021) on divide EO_ID: 26536 populations) between Roaring Creek and Old EO_ID: 4417 Clear Creek Xeric crest, all aspects, 0-8 percent slope, open whitebark pine woodland, 8,900 feet in elevation. July 31, 53 total North Fork Ranger District IDFG Element Occurrence EO 1990 individuals Along the Crags Trail (FS Trail Number: 5 021) about 1 mile south of Year Number of Location of Observations (USFS Source of Information Observed Individuals District, Town, River, Road Intersection, HUC, etc.) (3 Cathedral Rock and 2.7 miles EO_ID: 26519 populations) NW of Crags Campground Old EO_ID: 1714 Xeric crest, all aspects, 0-3 percent slope, open whitebark pine woodland, 8,800 feet in elevation.
  • FOOD PLANTS of the NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS by ELIAS YANOVSKY, Chemist, Carbohydrate Resea'rch Division, Bureau of Chemistry and Soils

    FOOD PLANTS of the NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS by ELIAS YANOVSKY, Chemist, Carbohydrate Resea'rch Division, Bureau of Chemistry and Soils

    r I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Miscellaneous Publication No. 237 Washington, D. C. July 1936 FOOD PLANTS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS By KLIAS YANOYSKY Chemist Carbohydrate Research Division, Bureau of Chemistry and Soils Foe sale by the Superintendent of Dosnenia, Washington. D. C. Price 10 centS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION No. 237 WASHINGTON, D. C. JULY 1936 FOOD PLANTS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS By ELIAS YANOVSKY, chemist, Carbohydrate Resea'rch Division, Bureau of Chemistry and Soils CONTENTS Page Page Foreword 1 Literature cited 65 Introduction I Index 69 Plants 2 FOREWORD This publication is a summary of the records of food plants used by the Indians of the United States and Canada which have appeared in ethnobotanical publications during a period of nearly 80 years.This compilation, for which all accessible literature has been searched, was drawn up as a preliminary to work by the Bureau of Chemistry and Soils on the chemical constituents and food value of native North American plants.In a compilation of this sort, in which it is im- possible to authenticate most of the botanical identifications because of the unavailability of the specimens on which they were based, occa- sional errors are unavoidable.All the botanical names given have been reviewed in the light of our present knowledge of plant distribu- tion, however, and it is believed that obvious errors of identification have been eliminated. The list finds its justification as a convenient summary of the extensive literature and is to be used subject to con- firmation and correction.In every instance brief references are made to the original authorities for the information cited.