DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, 1875-1958

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, 1875-1958 http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt1199q7hq No online items Finding Aid to the Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, 1875-1958 Finding Aid written by Bancroft Library Staff, based on finding aid by Dale Valory The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © © 2007 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. BANC FILM 2216 1 Finding Aid to the Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, 1875-1958 Collection number: BANC FILM 2216 The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Finding Aid Author(s): Finding Aid written by Bancroft Library Staff, based on finding aid by Dale Valory Finding Aid Encoded By: GenX © 2015 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Ethnological documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley Date (inclusive): 1875-1958 Collection Number: BANC FILM 2216 Extent: Microfilm: 139 reelsNumber of containers: 93 boxes, 14 oversize foldersLinear feet: 36 Repository: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: The Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, is composed of 216 separate collections of varying size, spanning the period 1875 to 1958, with the exception of a Quiché Maya manuscript leaf, dating from the 17th Century. The collection is comprised of manuscripts, field notes, and other linguistic, ethnographic and ethnobotanical documents, including card files, newsclippings, genealogical tables, charts, maps, drawings, photographs, as well as some original microfilm. Some of the data was gathered by Berkeley anthropology graduate students for the Culture Element Distribution Survey, under the direction of Alfred L. Kroeber. Many of the manuscripts contain notations in Kroeber's hand. The documents were transferred from the Robert H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology (now the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology) to The Bancroft Library in 1970. Languages Represented: Collection materials are in English Physical Location: Many of the Bancroft Library collections are stored offsite and advance notice may be required for use. For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Access Collection is available on microfilm only. Originals are not available for use. Publication Rights All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Public Services, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 94270-6000. Consent is given on behalf of The Bancroft Library as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner. See: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/reference/permissions.html . BANC FILM 2216 2 Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, BANC FILM 2216, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley., BANC FILM 2216, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley Bibliography Baer, Karl Ernst von and Gr. von Helmersen. 1839. Beitraege zur Kenntnis des russischen Reiches und der aufgraenzenden Laender Asiens. 1:80-96. Ballard, Arthur C.. 1929. Mythology of Southern Puget Sound. University of Washington Publications in Anthropology. 3:31-150. Barton, Roy Franklin. 1949. The Kalingas: Their Institutions and Custom Law. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Baumhoff, Martin A.. 1958. California Athapaskan Groups. Anthropological Records, University of California Press. 16:157-237. Bright, William. 1968. A Luiseño Dictionary. University of California Publications in Linguistics. 51. Dixon, Roland Burrage. 1905. The Northern Maidu. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 17:119-346. ________. 1910. The Chimariko Indians and Language. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 5:295-380. Dixon, Roland Burrage, and A. L. Kroeber. 1913. New Linguistic Families in California. American Anthropologist. 15:647-655. Dolores, Juan. 1913. Papago Verb Stems. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 10:241-263. ________. 1923. Papago Nominal Stems. Ibid. 20:19-31. DuBois, Constance Goddard. 1905. Religious Ceremonies and Myths of the Mission Indians. American Anthropologist. 7:620-629. ________. 1908. The Religion of the Luiseño Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 8:69-186. Elmendorf, William Welcome. 1960. The Structure of Twana Culture. Washington State University Research Studies, Monographic Supplement 2. Forde, Cyril Daryll. 1931. Ethnography of the Yuma Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 28:83-278. Freeman, John F., and Murphy D. Smith, eds.. 1966. A Guide to Manuscripts Relating to the American Indian in the Library of the American Philosophical Society. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society. 65. Gayton, Anna Hadwick. 1948. Northern Foothill Yokuts and Western Mono. Anthropological Records, University of California Press. 10:143-302. Gifford, Edward Winslow. 1916. Dichotomous Social Organization in South Central California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 11:291-296. ________. 1931. The Kamia of Imperial Valley. Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology. 97:1-88. ________. 1932. The Northfork Mono. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 31:15-65. ________. 1958. Karok Confessions. Miscelánea Paul Rivet, Octogenário Dicata. Publicaciones del Instituto de Historia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Serie 1, Número 50: 245-255. ________. 1967. Ethnographic Notes on the Southwestern Pomo. Anthropological Records, University of California Press. 25. Goddard, Pliny Earle. 1907. Kato Texts. University of California Publications in American Archaelogy and Ethnology. 5:65-238. ________. 1914. Chilula Texts. Ibid. 10:289-379. ________. 1918. Myths and Tales from the San Carlos Apache. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History. 24:1-86. ________. 1919. San Carlos Apache Texts. Ibid. 24:141-367. ________. 1923. Wailaki Texts. International Journal of American Linguistics. 2:77-135. ________. 1928. Pitch Accent in Hupa. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 23:333-338. Halpern, Abraham Meyer. 1946. Yuma. In Osgood, Cornelius, ed., Linguistic Structures of Native America. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology. 6:249-288. BANC FILM 2216 3 ________. 1946-7. Yuma. International Journal of American Linguistics. 12:25-33, 147-151, 204-212; 13:18-30, 92-107, 147-166. Harrington, John Peabody. 1942. Central California Coast. Anthropological Records, University of California Press. 7:1-46. Holt, Catharine. 1946. Shasta Ethnography. Ibid. 3:299-349. Kroeber, A. L.. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology. 78. ________. 1929. The Valley Nisenan. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 24:252-290. ________. 1967. Goddard's California Athabascan Texts. Edited by Herbert J. Landar. International Journal of American Linguistics. 33:269-275. Kroeber, A. L., and Edward Winslow Gifford. 1949. World Renewal: A Cult System of Native Northwest California. Anthropological Records, University of California Press. 13:1-155. Kroeber, A. L., and George William Grace. 1960. The Sparkman Grammar of Luiseño. University of California Publications in Linguistics. 16. Kroeber, A. L., and Dale Valory. 1967. Ethnological Manuscripts in the Robert H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers. 37:1-22. Loeb, Edwin Meyer. 1926. Pomo Folkways. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. 19: 149-405. Marsden, W. L.. 1923. The Northern Paiute Language of Oregon. Ibid. 20:175-l91. Mason, John Alden. 1916. The Mutsun Dialect of Costanoan. Ibid. 11:399-472. Nomland, Gladys Ayer, and A. L. Kroeber. 1936. Wiyot Towns. Ibid. 35:39-48. Olson, Ronald Leroy. 1936. Some Trading Customs of the Chilkat Tlingit. In Robert H. Lowie, ed., Essays in Anthropology Presented to A. L. Kroeber in Celebration of his Sixtieth Birthday, June 11, 1936. University of California Press. 211-214. ________. 1940. The Social Organization of the Haisla. Anthropological Records, University of California Press. 2:169-200. ________. 1954. Social Life of the Owikeno Kwakiutl. Ibid. 14:213-259. ________. 1955. Notes on the Bella Bella Kwakiutl. Ibid. 319-348. ________. 1967. Social Structure and Social Life of the Tlingit in Alaska. Ibid. 26:1-123 O'Neale, Lila Morris. 1932. Yurok-Karok
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CMS Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in California
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in California Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) staff work with beneficiaries, health care providers, state government, CMS contractors, community groups and others to provide education and address questions in California. American Indians and Alaska Natives If you have questions about CMS programs in relation to American Indians or Alaska Natives: • email the CMS Division of Tribal Affairs at [email protected], or • contact a CMS Native American Contact (NAC). For a list of NAC and their information, visit https://go.cms.gov/NACTAGlist Why enroll in CMS programs? When you sign up for Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or Medicare, the Indian health hospitals and clinics can bill these programs for services provided. Enrolling in these programs brings money into the health care facility, which is then used to hire more staff, pay for new equipment and building renovations, and saves Purchased and Referred Care dollars for other patients. Patients who enroll in CMS programs are not only helping themselves and others, but they’re also supporting their Indian health care hospital and clinics. Assistance in California To contact Indian Health Service in California, contact the California Area at (916) 930–3927. Find information about coverage and Indian health facilities in California. These facilities are shown on the maps in the next pages. Medicare California Department of Insurance 1 (800) 927–4357 www.insurance.ca.gov/0150-seniors/0300healthplans/ Medicaid/Children’s Health Medi-Cal 1 (916) 552–9200 www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal Marketplace Coverage Covered California 1 (800) 300–1506 www.coveredca.com Northern Feather River Tribal Health— Oroville California 2145 5th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interactive Brochure for Siskiyou and Humboldt Counties Variety of Socialand Healthservices
    W E L C O M E T O our LIFESTYLE Karuk Tribe An interactive brochure for Siskiyou and Humboldt Counties Skiing Camping Fishing Hiking River Fun Table of Contents of Table Swimming Rock Hounding Hunting Bird Watching Bicycling The Karuk Tribe is one of the largest Indian Tribal governments in Northern California. The Karuk Tribal community covers all of Siskiyou County and Eastern Humboldt Four-Wheeling Horse Back Riding Drop Camping Snowmobiling Golfing County from the Siskiyou County/Oregon border to Bluff Creek, encompassing approximately 4,000 miles. The service area has been divided accordingly, because the traditional land boundaries of the Karuk Tribe once included over one million acres of sacred grounds, hunting areas, and Indian communities along the Klamath and Salmon Rivers. The Karuk Tribe is a federally recognized Indian Tribe whose constitution was formally adopted by its members on April 17, 1985. Services provided by the Tribe include general government, education and a variety of social and health services. Southern Oregon Oregon Coast California Coast History Additional Info HOME Skiing Skiing Snowboard or ski down California’s majestic Mt. Shasta or Oregon’s amazing Mt. Ashland. Night skiing is a relaxing way to start your weekends. Cross Country more your style? Mountains and parks throughout Northern California and Southern Oregon will keep your skis happy. HOME Camping Camping There’s no better place to roast smores than while camping in Northern California. Klamath River, Trees of Heaven, Sarah Totten and Dillon Creek are a few locations to add to your camping destination list. HOME Fishing Grab your favorite fishing gear and head to one of the locals favorite fishing spots such as Trinity Lake, Shasta Lake, Lake Siskiyou, or the Fishing Klamath River.
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Clyde Kluckhohn
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C LYDE KAY MA B E N K LUCKHOHN 1905—1960 A Biographical Memoir by MELVILLE J. H ERSKOVITS Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1964 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. CLYDE KAY MABEN KLUCKHOHN January n, igo^—July 28, ig6o BY MELVILLE J. HERSKOVITS HEN CLYDE KLUCKHOHN was seventeen years old ill health W caused him to spend two years in New Mexico and Arizona, on what he later described as "the fringes of the Indian Country." This experience was to be decisive in shaping his subsequent career as an anthropologist. It brought into focus what, in his own words, was "the fact that I grew up in an English settlement in Iowa and early perceived, however dimly, a cross-cultural situation." It was this perception, steadily sharpened by continuous field research, omnivorous reading, and constant probing for theoretical implica- tion, that brought him to the point of achievement and reputa- tion he had attained when a coronary thrombosis abruptly ended his life in the very Indian country where he had worked, and which he so greatly loved. During all his scientific career he consistently followed both mi- croethnographic and macroethnographic lines of anthropological in- terest. There are, in various parts of die world, those who are dis- tinguished because of the skill with which they have probed ever more deeply into particular cultures, but it is difficult to name one who is as deeply concerned with theoretical significance as with ethnographic fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating an Abundant San Francisco Bay
    Cultivating an Abundant San Francisco Bay Watch the segment online at http://education.savingthebay.org/cultivating-an-abundant-san-francisco-bay Watch the segment on DVD: Episode 1, 17:35-22:39 Video length: 5 minutes 20 seconds SUBJECT/S VIDEO OVERVIEW Science The early human inhabitants of the San Francisco Bay Area, the Ohlone and the Coast Miwok, cultivated an abundant environment. History In this segment you’ll learn: GRADE LEVELS about shellmounds and other ways in which California Indians affected the landscape. 4–5 how the native people actually cultivated the land. ways in which tribal members are currently working to restore their lost culture. Native people of San Francisco Bay in a boat made of CA CONTENT tule reeds off Angel Island c. 1816. This illustration is by Louis Choris, a French artist on a Russian scientific STANDARDS expedition to San Francisco Bay. (The Bancroft Library) Grade 4 TOPIC BACKGROUND History–Social Science 4.2.1. Discuss the major Native Americans have lived in the San Francisco Bay Area for thousands of years. nations of California Indians, Shellmounds—constructed from shells, bone, soil, and artifacts—have been found in including their geographic distribution, economic numerous locations across the Bay Area. Certain shellmounds date back 2,000 years activities, legends, and and more. Many of the shellmounds were also burial sites and may have been used for religious beliefs; and describe ceremonial purposes. Due to the fact that most of the shellmounds were abandoned how they depended on, centuries before the arrival of the Spanish to California, it is unknown whether they are adapted to, and modified the physical environment by related to the California Indians who lived in the Bay Area at that time—the Ohlone and cultivation of land and use of the Coast Miwok.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography and Dialects of the Miwok Indians
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY VOL. 6 NO. 2 THE GEOGRAPHY AND DIALECTS OF THE MIWOK INDIANS. BY S. A. BARRETT. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction.--...--.................-----------------------------------333 Territorial Boundaries ------------------.....--------------------------------344 Dialects ...................................... ..-352 Dialectic Relations ..........-..................................356 Lexical ...6.................. 356 Phonetic ...........3.....5....8......................... 358 Alphabet ...................................--.------------------------------------------------------359 Vocabularies ........3......6....................2..................... 362 Footnotes to Vocabularies .3.6...........................8..................... 368 INTRODUCTION. Of the many linguistic families in California most are con- fined to single areas, but the large Moquelumnan or Miwok family is one of the few exceptions, in that the people speaking its various dialects occupy three distinct areas. These three areas, while actually quite near together, are at considerable distances from one another as compared with the areas occupied by any of the other linguistic families that are separated. The northern of the three Miwok areas, which may for con- venience be called the Northern Coast or Lake area, is situated in the southern extremity of Lake county and just touches, at its northern boundary, the southernmost end of Clear lake. This 334 University of California Publications in Am. Arch.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Native Languages of West-Central California
    Chapter 2. Native Languages of West-Central California This chapter discusses the native language spoken at Spanish contact by people who eventually moved to missions within Costanoan language family territories. No area in North America was more crowded with distinct languages and language families than central California at the time of Spanish contact. In the chapter we will examine the information that leads scholars to conclude the following key points: The local tribes of the San Francisco Peninsula spoke San Francisco Bay Costanoan, the native language of the central and southern San Francisco Bay Area and adjacent coastal and mountain areas. San Francisco Bay Costanoan is one of six languages of the Costanoan language family, along with Karkin, Awaswas, Mutsun, Rumsen, and Chalon. The Costanoan language family is itself a branch of the Utian language family, of which Miwokan is the only other branch. The Miwokan languages are Coast Miwok, Lake Miwok, Bay Miwok, Plains Miwok, Northern Sierra Miwok, Central Sierra Miwok, and Southern Sierra Miwok. Other languages spoken by native people who moved to Franciscan missions within Costanoan language family territories were Patwin (a Wintuan Family language), Delta and Northern Valley Yokuts (Yokutsan family languages), Esselen (a language isolate) and Wappo (a Yukian family language). Below, we will first present a history of the study of the native languages within our maximal study area, with emphasis on the Costanoan languages. In succeeding sections, we will talk about the degree to which Costanoan language variation is clinal or abrupt, the amount of difference among dialects necessary to call them different languages, and the relationship of the Costanoan languages to the Miwokan languages within the Utian Family.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Languages, Indigenous Languages of the Native Peoples of North, Middle, and South America
    Native American Languages, indigenous languages of the native peoples of North, Middle, and South America. The precise number of languages originally spoken cannot be known, since many disappeared before they were documented. In North America, around 300 distinct, mutually unintelligible languages were spoken when Europeans arrived. Of those, 187 survive today, but few will continue far into the 21st century, since children are no longer learning the vast majority of these. In Middle America (Mexico and Central America) about 300 languages have been identified, of which about 140 are still spoken. South American languages have been the least studied. Around 1500 languages are known to have been spoken, but only about 350 are still in use. These, too are disappearing rapidly. Classification A major task facing scholars of Native American languages is their classification into language families. (A language family consists of all languages that have evolved from a single ancestral language, as English, German, French, Russian, Greek, Armenian, Hindi, and others have all evolved from Proto-Indo-European.) Because of the vast number of languages spoken in the Americas, and the gaps in our information about many of them, the task of classifying these languages is a challenging one. In 1891, Major John Wesley Powell proposed that the languages of North America constituted 58 independent families, mainly on the basis of superficial vocabulary resemblances. At the same time Daniel Brinton posited 80 families for South America. These two schemes form the basis of subsequent classifications. In 1929 Edward Sapir tentatively proposed grouping these families into superstocks, 6 in North America and 15 in Middle America.
    [Show full text]
  • Cahto Motion for Summary J
    Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 1 of 43 1 Colin Cloud Hampson (Bar No.174184) SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, 2 ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP 750 B Street, Suite 3130 3 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 546-5585 4 Attorneys for Cahto Tribe of the 5 Laytonville Rancheria 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CAHTO TRIBE OF THE LAYTONVILLE ) Case No. 2:10-CV-01306-GEB-GGH RANCHERIA, ) 8 ) ) Plaintiff, 9 ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ) CAHTO TRIBE’S MOTION FOR vs. ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 ) AMY DUTSCHKE, Regional Director for the ) 11 ) Pacific Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs, ) United States Department of the ) 12 Interior, KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the ) Hearing: May 2, 2011 9:00 a.m. Interior, United States Department of the ) Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 13 ) Interior, LARRY ECHO HAWK, Assistant ) Secretary – Indian Affairs, United States 14 ) Department of the Interior, ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 18 CAHTO TRIBE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 20 21 22 23 24 109967.1 Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 2 of 43 1 Table of Contents Page 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 3 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..............................................................................................................2 4 A. Background ..............................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Year at Betty and Bob's: an Adventure
    last year at betty and bob’s an adventure Before you start to read this book, take this moment to think about making a donation to punctum books, an independent non-profit press @ https://punctumbooks.com/support If you’re reading the e-book, you can click on the image below to go directly to our donations site. Any amount, no matter the size, is appreciated and will help us to keep our ship of fools afloat. Contributions from dedi- cated readers will also help us to keep our commons open and to cultivate new work that can’t find a wel- coming port elsewhere. Our adventure is not possible without your support. Vive la Open Access. Fig. 1. Hieronymus Bosch, Ship of Fools (1490–1500) last year at betty and bob’s: an adventure. Copyright © 2018 by Sher Doruff. This work carries a Creative Commons BY-nC-sa 4.0 In- ternational license, which means that you are free to copy and redis- tribute the material in any medium or format, and you may also remix, transform and build upon the material, as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors (but not in a way that suggests the authors or punctum books endorses you and your work), you do not use this work for commercial gain in any form whatsoever, and that for any remixing and transformation, you distribute your rebuild under the same license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ First published in 2018 by 3Ecologies Books/Immediations, an imprint of punctum books.
    [Show full text]
  • Ditransitive Constructions Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig (Germany) 23-25 November 2007
    Conference on Ditransitive Constructions Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig (Germany) 23-25 November 2007 Abstracts On “Dimonotransitive” Structures in English Carmen Aguilera Carnerero University of Granada Ditransitive structures have been prototypically defined as those combinations of a ditransitive verb with an indirect object and a direct object. However, although in the prototypical ditransitive construction in English, both objects are present, there is often omission of one of the constituentes, usually the indirect object. The absence of the indirect object has been justified on the basis of the irrelevance of its specification or the possibility of recovering it from the context. The absence of the direct object, on the other hand, is not so common and only occur with a restricted number of verbs (e.g. pay, show or tell).This type of sentences have been called “dimonotransitives” by Nelson, Wallis and Aarts (2002) and the sole presence in the syntactic structure arises some interesting questions we want to clarify in this article, such as: (a) the degree of syntactic and semantic obligatoriness of indirect objects and certain ditransitive verbs (b) the syntactic behaviour of indirect objects in absence of the direct object, in other words, does the Oi take over some of the properties of typical direct objects as Huddleston and Pullum suggest? (c) The semantic and pragmatic interpretations of the missing element. To carry out our analysis, we will adopt a corpus –based approach and especifically we will use the International Corpus of English (ICE) for the most frequent ditransitive verbs (Mukherjee 2005) and the British National Corpus (BNC) for the not so frequent verbs.
    [Show full text]