DOCSLIB.ORG

Systematic Status of the Cichlid Fishes Cichlasoma Dorsatum, C. Granadense and C. Nigritum Meek

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes Papers in the Biological Sciences 1976 Systematic Status of the Cichlid Fishes Cichlasoma dorsatum, C. granadense and C. nigritum Meek Jaime Villa Cornell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ichthynicar Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Villa, Jaime, "Systematic Status of the Cichlid Fishes Cichlasoma dorsatum, C. granadense and C. nigritum Meek" (1976). Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes. 26. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ichthynicar/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in INVESTIGATIONS OF THE ICHTHYOFAUNA OF NICARAGUAN LAKES, ed. Thomas B. Thorson (University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1976). Copyright © 1976 School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Systematic Status of the Cichlid Fishes Cichlasoma dorsatum, C. granadense and C. nigritum Meek JAIME VILLA In his Synopsis of the Fishes of the Great Lakes of C. erythraeum (See Fig. 2B and Gunther, 1869, PI. 75, Fig. 2). Nicaragua, Meek (1907) described 3 new cichlid fishes, This condition is clearly intermediate between C. labiatum Cichlasoma dorsatum, C. granadense and C. nigritum. The de­ and C. citrinellum. scriptions appeared after the two major revisions of the The variation in the Cichlasoma citrinellum-erythraeum­ genus Cichlasoma (Pellegrin, 1904; Regan, 1905), which labiatum-lobochilus complex, in color, body shape, lip and perhaps explains why they have since been ignored. tooth development, etc., is overwhelming, and it is possible In his Supplement to the Pisces section of Biologia to recognize many different "species" by artificially combin­ Centrali-Americana, Regan (1908) included these species ing several variables (Fig. 3). Astorqui (1972a), however, on the basis of the published descriptions, and briefly noted recognized only 2 species in the complex, an interpretation similarities with other chichlids. Fowler (1923) compared C. with which I tentatively concur. These are Cichlasoma granadense with his C. bouchellei. Except for the inclusion in a labiatum, characterized by having broad, thick lips, and C. few faunal lists (e.g., Jordan et al., 1930), the species have citrinellum, with lips of "normal" or reduced size. In addi­ not been referred to again. In his review of the fishes of the tion, Astorqui found proportional differences, but when great lakes of Nicaragua, Astorqui (l972a) excluded these larger samples from different localities are studied, these species altogether. This was pointed out in a review of tend to overlap (Tables 2, 4). It is questionable if both Astorqui's monograph (Villa, 1972), to which he replied sp~ies are valid, but since it is usually possible to separate that "C. dorsatum, C. nigritum and C. granadense were not even small specimens (larger than 65 mm SL) on the basis included in any synonymy as it was impossible with the of the)ip condition (the development of which is ontogene­ scarce data supplied by Meek" (Astorqui, 1972b). tic and perhaps also sex-related), and since there seem to be Through the courtesy of Loren P. Woods, Field Museum certain behavioral differences between them (Barlow, in of Natural History (FMNH), I examined the entire lilt.) it seems premature to consider them identical. hypodigm of the 3 nominal species, consisting of 15 speci­ On the basis of fin-ray counts, scales and gill rakers (Ta­ mens in excellent condition. Comparative material was bles 1, 3), it is not possible to separate C. dorsatum from the loaned by C. E. Dawson, Gulf Coast Research Laborat6ry nominal species C. citrinellum, C. erythraeum, C. labiatum, and (GCRL) andJames E. Bohlke, Academy of Natural Sciences C. lobochilus. Measurements and proportions (Tables 2, 4) of of Philadelphia (ANSP). P. H. Greenwood, British Museum C. dorsatum generally overlap with those of the 3 above­ of Natural History (BMNH) kindly provided data and il­ mentioned species, although in some cases the mean values lustrations of the types of Cichlasoma citrinellum, C. eryth­ may be slightly different in the studied samples. I can find raeum, C. lab iatu m, C. lobochilus and C. maculicauda. William no differences, other than those due to age (size) and indi­ A. Bussing, U niversidad de Costa Rica, Museo de Zoologia vidual variation, to separate C. dorsatum from the nominal (UCR) did the same for specimens of C. maculicauda from species cited above. Between C. labiatum and C. citrinellum Nicaragua and Costa Rica. Specimens in my personal collec­ (the 2 oldest names in the group) I would assign C. dorsatum tion OV) were examined but few of their data are presented to the synonymy orc. labiatum solely on the basis of having herein as the collections were largely destroyed by the De­ broad, thick lips. On the same basis, C. erythaeum may be cember, 1972 Nicaraguan earthquake. considered synonymous with C. labiatum, although the latter's triangular skin flap and generally exuberant lip de­ Cichlasoma dorsatum velopment are mote modest in the type of C. erythraeum. The species was based on 5 specimens from lakes Man­ Astorqui (1972a) considered C. erythraeum a synonym of C. agua and Nicaragua. They have the general appearance of citrinellum. Cichlasoma labiatum and C. citrinellum. Meek (1907, key p. F ernandez-Yepez (1969) made C. lobochilum (sic) the type 118) separated C. labiatum and C. lobochilus from C. of a new genus, Curraichthys, in which he also included C. granadense, C. citrinellum, C. dorsatum and C. erythraeum on dorsatum, C. erythraeum and C. labiatum. The content of this the basis of having "lips broad and thick, medianly pro­ group is identical to Regan's (1905) "Section 10" of duced into a long triangular flap," the latter group having Cichlasoma, except for inclusion of the later-described C. "lips normal" or "lips very broad, slightly produced me­ dorsatum. Regan (1906, p. 17) noted that the five sections dianly." The types of C. dorsatum have broad and thick lips into which he arranged the Central American and Mexican (Fig. 1); a large paratype (FMNH 5773) and a small one species .... "appear to be natural groups, but .... are not (FMNH 5972) have strong indication of such a "long trian­ sufficiently sharply defined to rank as subgenera." Since gular flap," although not fully developed; in 2 smaller the description of Curraichthys is hardly diagnostic and since paratypes (FMNH 5970) the flap is either apparently be­ no justification is offered to raise a "section" to full generic ginning or is absent, but the lips are broad and thick, as in rank, I see no reason for using a different generic name. 375 VILLA I 9 HI II 12 1:t 14 15 I' 'II, lil'I", . " I' 3 4 5, 6~ 8.~O II 12 I " 1 FIG. l. Type specimens ofCichlasoma dorsatum Meek. (A) Holotype; FIG. 2. Types of Cichlasoma citrinellum (A, syntype), C. erythraeum (B, note enlarged lips but triangular skin flap not well developed. holotype), and C. labiatum (C, syntype). The development of the (B) Paratype (FMNH 5971) with a shorter pectoral; the upper Ii ps in the type of C. erythraeum is intermediate between C. citrinel­ skin flap (arrow) is slightly developed but is bent posteriorly over lum and C. labiatum. The apparent size of the skin flaps in C. premaxilla. (C) Small paratype (FMNH 5972) already showing labiatum is enhanced by the shadow. From Kodachromes by G. enlarged lips and incipient skin flaps. Howes (no scales given). TABLE l. Meristic data for Cichlasoma labiatum, including the type spe cimens of C. dorsatum, C. erythraeum and C. lobochilus, and data from Astorqui (l972a). Means in parentheses; number of specimens examined enclosed in brackets. C. dorsa tum [5] C. labiatum [2] C. labiatum [17] C. erythraeum [1] C. lobochilus [1] Character (Types) (Types) (Astorqui) (Holotype) (Holotype) Dorsal spines 17 17 16-17 17 17 Dorsal soft rays 10-12 (1l.0) 11 11-12 11 11 Anal spines 7 6-7 (6.5) 6-7 7 7 Anal soft rays 8-9 (8.6) 8-9 (8.5) 7-10 8 9 Pelvic rays 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 Pectoral rays 12-14 (13.0) 14 14-15 13 14 Caudal rays 16 15-16 (15.5) 18 16 Predorsal scales 14-18 (16.0) 12-14 (13.0) 14 14 Peduncle scales 16-17 (16.0) 16 18 17 Scales above lat. line 5.5-6.5 (6.0) 6 6 7 Scales in lat. line 31-35 (33.0) 32-34 (33.0) 30-34 34 33 Scales below lat. line 8.5-10.5 (9.5) 9-10 (9.5) 10 8 Gill rakers, lower limb 9-12 (10.6) 11 10-14 8 9 Gill rakers, uEEer limb 2-3 (2.8) 4 2-5 3 3 376 TABLE 2. Measurements and proportions for selected characters of Cichlasoma labiatum, including the type specimens of C. dorsatum, C. erythraeum and C. lobochilus, and data from Astorqui (1972a). Means in parentheses; number of specimens examined enclosed in brackets. Character (Proportions in C. dorsa tum [5] C. labia tum [2] C. labiatum [17] C. labiatum [13] C. erythraeum [1] C. lobochilus [1] thousandths of SL) (Types) (Types) (Astorqui) L. Nicaragua OV 7070) (Holotype, L. Managua) (Holotype, L. Managua) Standard length (mm) 73.0-154 (116.16) 113.1-144.0 (128.50) 117-177 (139.0) 76-171 (111.30) 133.0 152.0 Predorsal length 445.48-481.65 (460.14) 392.36-439.43 (415.90) 429-449 (436) 414.81-492.06 (454.52) 364.66 342.11 Preanal length 665.42-684.93 (679.24) 677 .08-776.30 (726.69) 658-719 (691)
Recommended publications
  • A Tale of Two Herichthys

    A Tale of Two Herichthys

    MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 209(1): 1-18 LIVE COLOR PATTERNS DIAGNOSE SPECIES: A TALE OF TWO HERICHTHYS By RONALD G. OLDFIELD1,2, ABHINAV KAKUTURU1, 2 3 4 WILLIAM I. LUTTERSCHMIDT , O. TOM LORENZ , ADAM E. COHEN , AND DEAN A. HENDRICKSON4 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Zoology University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–1079, USA Ann Arbor, April 27, 2021 ISSN 0076-8406 JOHN LUNDBERG1, EDITOR GERALD SMITH2, EDITOR MACKENZIE SCHONDELMAYER2, COMPOSITOR 1Department of Ichthyology, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19103 2Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48197 LIVE COLOR PATTERNS DIAGNOSE SPECIES: A TALE OF TWO HERICHTHYS By RONALD G. OLDFIELD1,2, ABHINAV KAKUTURU1, WILLIAM I. LUTTERSCHMIDT2, O. TOM LORENZ3, ADAM E. COHEN4, AND DEAN A. HENDRICKSON4 ABSTRACT The Rio Grande Cichlid, Herichthys cyanoguttatus, is native to the drainages of the Gulf Coast of northern Mexico and southern Texas and has been introduced at several sites in the US. Previous observations have suggested that non-native populations in Louisiana that are currently recognized as H. cyanoguttatus resemble another species, the Lowland Cichlid, H. carpintis. Traditional morphological and genetic techniques have been insufficient to differentiate these species, but H. carpintis has been reported to differ fromH. cyanoguttatus in color pattern, so we turned to novel electronic photo archives to determine the identity of the species introduced in Louisiana. First, we used the public databases Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database and Fishes of Texas to infer the historical distributions of these species in the US.
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November

    §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November

    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
  • Selection, Constraint, and Adaptation in the Visual Genes of Neotropical Cichlid Fishes and Other Vertebrates

    Selection, Constraint, and Adaptation in the Visual Genes of Neotropical Cichlid Fishes and Other Vertebrates

    SELECTION, CONSTRAINT, AND ADAPTATION IN THE VISUAL GENES OF NEOTROPICAL CICHLID FISHES AND OTHER VERTEBRATES by Frances Elisabeth Hauser A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Frances E. Hauser 2018 SELECTION, CONSTRAINT, AND ADAPTATION IN THE VISUAL GENES OF NEOTROPICAL CICHLID FISHES AND OTHER VERTEBRATES Frances E. Hauser Doctor of Philosophy, 2018 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2018 ABSTRACT The visual system serves as a direct interface between an organism and its environment. Studies of the molecular components of the visual transduction cascade, in particular visual pigments, offer an important window into the relationship between genetic variation and organismal fitness. In this thesis, I use molecular evolutionary models as well as protein modeling and experimental characterization to assess the role of variable evolutionary rates on visual protein function. In Chapter 2, I review recent work on the ecological and evolutionary forces giving rise to the impressive variety of adaptations found in visual pigments. In Chapter 3, I use interspecific vertebrate and mammalian datasets of two visual genes (RH1 or rhodopsin, and RPE65, a retinoid isomerase) to assess different methods for estimating evolutionary rate across proteins and the reliability of inferring evolutionary conservation at individual amino acid sites, with a particular emphasis on sites implicated in impaired protein function. ii In Chapters 4, and 5, I narrow my focus to devote particular attention to visual pigments in Neotropical cichlids, a highly diverse clade of fishes distributed across South and Central America.
  • Mayan Cichlid (Cichlasoma Urophthalmum) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Mayan Cichlid (Cichlasoma Urophthalmum) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mayan Cichlid (Cichlasoma urophthalmum) Ecological Risk Screening Summary Web Version – 11/01/2012 Photo: Alexander Calder 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Robins (2001): The Mayan cichlid is native to the Central American Atlantic slope waters of southeastern Mexico (including the Yucatán Peninsula), Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua. Nonindigenous Occurrences From Schofield et al. (2011): “This species was first documented in Florida when specimens were observed and collected and observed in Everglades National Park in 1983; it is established in several areas in and around the park (Loftus 1987; Lorenz et al. 1997; Smith-Vaniz, personal communication [not cited]; Tilmant 1999) and Big Cypress National Preserve (Nico, unpublished data; Tilmant 1999).” “On the east side of Florida it has been recorded from Canal C-111 north to the Little River Canal (C-7 Canal) (Shafland 1995).” Cichlasoma urophthalmus Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Web Version – 11/1/2012 “A single specimen was taken from a rock pit in Manatee County in October 1975 (Smith- Vaniz, personal communication [not cited]).” “Mayan ciclids have also been collected in Lake Okeechobee and Lake Osbourne, Palm Beach County in 2003 (Cocking 2003; Werner 2003).” “A new population was found in Charlotte Harbor in the summer of 2003 (Adams and Wolfe 2007; Associated Press 2003; Charlotte Harbor NEP 2004; Byrley, personal communication [not cited]). This is the most northern population known.” Reported established in Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (2005).” “A specimen was collected in Holiday Park in Broward County (International Game Fishing Association 2000).” “In 2006, this species was found to be established in Mobbly Bayou in Tampa Bay and in canals on Merritt Island in 2007 (Paperno et al.
  • Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma Urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico

    Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma Urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico

    Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 17 Issue 1 January 2005 Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico Rafael Chavez-Lopez Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Mark S. Peterson University of Southern Mississippi, [email protected] Nancy J. Brown-Peterson University of Southern Mississippi, [email protected] Ana Adalia Morales-Gomez Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Chavez-Lopez, R., M. S. Peterson, N. J. Brown-Peterson, A. Morales-Gomez and J. Franco-Lopez. 2005. Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico. Gulf and Caribbean Research 17 (1): 123-131. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol17/iss1/13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.1701.13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ecology of the Mayan Cichlid, Cichlasoma urophthalmus Günther, in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz, Mexico Authors Rafael Chavez-Lopez, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; Mark S. Peterson, University of Southern Mississippi; Nancy J. Brown-Peterson, University of Southern Mississippi; Ana Adalia Morales- Gomez, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; and Jonathan Franco-Lopez, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico This article is available in Gulf and Caribbean Research: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol17/iss1/13 Book for Press.qxp 2/28/05 3:30 PM Page 123 Gulf and Caribbean Research Vol 17, 123–131, 2005 Manuscript received July 18, 2004; accepted September 20, 2004 ECOLOGY OF THE MAYAN CICHLID, CICHLASOMA UROPHTHALMUS GÜNTHER, IN THE ALVARADO LAGOONAL SYSTEM, VERACRUZ, MEXICO Rafael Chávez-López, Mark S.
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
  • Classifications and Other Ordering Systems

    Classifications and Other Ordering Systems

    J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 40 (2002) 169–194 Received on 5 August 2002 Ó 2002 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin ISSN 0947–5745 1Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; 2Department of Biological Sciences, Columbian University, NewYork, NY, USA Classifications and other ordering systems Ernst Mayr1 and W. J. Bock2 Abstract 9.5.1. Evidently descended from the same ancestor 1. Introduction 9.5.2. Parallelophyly 2. Why ordering systems should be of interest to the 9.5.3. Reversal philosopher? 9.5.4. Convergence 3. The universality of diversity 9.6. Significance of characters (weighing) 4. Objectives of ordering systems 9.7. Numerical approaches 4.1. Sorting 10. Ordering by using only the criterion of phylogeny – type 5 4.2. Information storage and retrieval is a major objective 10.1. Hennigian cladification of most ordering systems 10.2. Peculiarities of Hennigian terminology 4.3. Identification of an unknown item 10.2.1. Paraphyly 4.4. Inferences about not yet studied properties 10.2.2. Monophyly 4.5. To serve as base line in comparative studies 10.2.3. Relationship 5. Kinds of Ordering Systems 10.2.4. Classification 5.1 General considerations 10.2.5. Taxon 5.2. Ordering of single entities 10.3. Cladistic analysis 5.2.1. Assigning singular entities to a linear sequence 10.4. Recognition of clades (sequential listing) –type 1 11. Upward classification by two criteria, clustering by 5.2.1.1. Arbitrary sequence similarity and by common descent – type 6 5.2.1.2. Alphabetical listing 11.1. Pre-Darwinian classification 5.2.1.3.
  • Cichlasoma Dimerus Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Cichlasoma Dimerus Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Cichlasoma dimerus (a cichlid, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, August 2011 Revised, October 2012, August 2018 Web Version, 9/11/2018 Photo: Pandolfi et al. (2009). Licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. Available: http://ref.scielo.org/bhxc5w. (August 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “South America: Paraná River basin, in the Paraguay River drainage in Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay, and the Paraná River drainage of Argentina.” 1 From Pandolfi et al. (2009): “The natural range of this species encompasses the entire system of the Paraguay river, the lower Alto Paraná, and the rest of the Paraná river basin up to the vicinity of Buenos Aires city (Kullander, 1983). Locality records are known from four countries (Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina) where it inhabits a wide variety of both lentic and lotic environments.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. There is no indication that this species is in trade in the United States. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. Remarks From Pandolfi et al. (2009): “Its common names are “chanchita” (Spanish) and “acará” (Portuguese) (Staeck and Linke, 1995; Casciotta et al., 2005).” 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Acanthopterygii Order Perciformes Suborder Labroidei Family Cichlidae Genus Cichlasoma Species Cichlasoma dimerus (Heckel, 1840)” From Eschmeyer et al.
  • Neue Gattungseinteilung Der Mittelamerikanischen Cichliden

    Neue Gattungseinteilung Der Mittelamerikanischen Cichliden

    DCG_Info_07_2016_HR_20160621_DCG_Info 21.06.2016 06:51 Seite 146 Neue Gattungseinteilung der mittelamerikanischen Cichliden Rico Morgenstern Foto: Juan Miguel Artigas Azas Theraps irregularis verbleibt als einzige Art in der Gattung Theraps. Die Aufnahme entstand im Rio Lacanja im südlichen Chiapas, Mexiko. Inzwischen ist es fast 33 Jahre her, wenigstens Versuche, einzelne Gat- schien die Abhandlung „Diversity and dass KULLANDER (1983) die Gattung tungen neu zu definieren – aber eine evolution of the Middle American cich- Cichlasoma auf zwölf südamerikani- umfassende Gesamtbearbeitung er- lid fishes (Teleostei: Cichlidae) with re- sche, nahe mit der Typusart C. bima- folgte bisher nicht. Vielfach wurden vised classification“ (ŘIČAN et al. culatum verwandte Arten beschränkte. Zuordnungen vorgenommen, ohne 2016). Seither durfte der Name streng ge- dass man sich um eine wirkliche Be- nommen für die Mehrzahl der bis gründung bemühte. Die Arbeit berücksichtigt alle Cichliden dahin in dieser ehemaligen Sammel- Nord- und Mittelamerikas und der An- gattung untergebrachten, überwie- Bei der Gattungseinteilung der mittel- tillen sowie einige eng verwandte süd- gend mittelamerikanischen Arten amerikanischen Cichliden herrschte amerikanische Gattungen (Australoheros, nicht mehr verwendet werden. Man- somit bis vor kurzem ein ziemliches Caquetaia, Heroina, Mesoheros). gels geeigneter Alternativen ist das Chaos. Nun ist jedoch das Ende der An- Diese Fische gehören zu den „heroinen aber dennoch geschehen, wobei der führungszeichen (mit einer Ausnahme)
  • Appendix A. Taxa Included in the Study Indicating Samples Used, Catalog Number of Museum Vouchers When Available, and General Collection Locality

    Appendix A. Taxa Included in the Study Indicating Samples Used, Catalog Number of Museum Vouchers When Available, and General Collection Locality

    Appendix A. Taxa included in the study indicating samples used, catalog number of museum vouchers when available, and general collection locality. Museum abbreviations are: AMNH – American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA; ANSP – Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, USA; AUM – Auburn University Museum, Auburn, Alabama, USA; ECOSUR – Fish Collection at Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico; MCNG – Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Guanare, Venezuela; MNHN – Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; ROM – Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada; UFRGS – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; UTFTC – University of Tennessee Fish Collection, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA. ROM Catalogue Current taxonomy name Tissue Cat No No Locality Description Notes Outgroup Pseudetroplus maculatus T14743 ROM 98998 Aquarium trade India-Madagascar Etroplus suratensis T13505 ROM 93809 Aquarium trade Paratilapia polleni T13100 ROM 88333 Aquarium trade Lake Andrapongy, Paretroplus damii 201936 AMNH 201936 Madagascar Paretroplus polyactis T12265 AMNH Africa Chromidotilapia guntheri T11700 AMNH I-226361 Beffa River, Benin Aquarium trade, wild caught, Etia nguti T10792 ROM 88042 Cameroon Hemichromis bimaculatus T11719 Tchan Duga, Benin Aquarium trade, wild caught, Heterochromis multidens T07136 ROM 88350 Lobeke, Cameroon Oreochromis niloticus 9092S AMNH254194 Littoral Province, Guinea Aquarium trade, wild caught, Congo River, Democratic Orthochromis stormsi T10766 ROM 88041 Republic of
  • Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana

    Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana

    Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings Volume 1 Number 61 2021 Article 3 March 2021 Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Michael H. Doosey University of New Orelans, [email protected] Henry L. Bart Jr. Tulane University, [email protected] Kyle R. Piller Southeastern Louisiana Univeristy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biodiversity Commons Recommended Citation Doosey, Michael H.; Bart, Henry L. Jr.; and Piller, Kyle R. (2021) "Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana," Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: No. 61. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings/vol1/iss61/3 This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings. Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Abstract Since the publication of Freshwater Fishes of Louisiana (Douglas, 1974) and a revised checklist (Douglas and Jordan, 2002), much has changed regarding knowledge of inland fishes in the state. An updated reference on Louisiana’s inland and coastal fishes is long overdue. Inland waters of Louisiana are home to at least 224 species (165 primarily freshwater, 28 primarily marine, and 31 euryhaline or diadromous) in 45 families. This checklist is based on a compilation of fish collections records in Louisiana from 19 data providers in the Fishnet2 network (www.fishnet2.net).
  • Cichlasoma Sieboldii and C. Tuba

    Cichlasoma Sieboldii and C. Tuba

    Rev. Biol Trop., 23 (2) : 189-211, 1975 Taxonomy and biological aspects 01 the Central Amer'ican cichlid fishes Cichlasoma sieboldii and C. tuba by William A. Bussing'lí< (Received for publication May 22, 1975) ABSTRACTo' The complex taxonomic history of Cichlasoma sieboldii is re· viewed. Cichlasoma punctatum and its synonym Theraps terrabae are induded for the first time in the synoymy of C. sieboldii. A report of C. guttulatum from Pa­ namá is attributable to a misidentification of C. tuba, which had not been pre­ viously reported from that countIy. The morphologic and meristic variation, coloration, ecology and geographic distribution of C. sieboldii and C. tuba are discussed.. M:orphologic and distri­ butional evidence suggest that these twÜ' species are Pacific and Atlantic slope de­ rivatives of a common Pliocene' ancestor. There is a marked resemblance between the ciehlid fauna of the Atlan­ tic slope of lower Central Ameriea and the southeastern region of Costa Rica. The historieal reasons fo! this similarity have been discussed (4). The present study reviews the taxonomic history and discusses the biology of a Pacifie slope species, Ci¡h/asoma sieboldii, and its Atlantic versant counterpart, Cieh/asoma. tu­ ba (Fig. 1). MATERIAL AND METHODS Body measureinents are expressed in standard length (SL) in millime­ ters (mm). Body propartions of C. sieboldir as parts per mil appear in Table 1. The last two dorsal and anal rays are counted as ane only when their bases are in contact; when the base of the last ray is not touching the penultimate ray, each ray is counted separately.