DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Plan Hudson Tunnel Project Financial Plan 23 August 2019 Submitted by The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Hudson Tunnel Project Sponsor as defined herein) In partnership with: The New Jersey Transit Corporation (Transit Operator); The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak); and Gateway Program Development Corporation Hudson Tunnel Project Financial Plan Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Gateway Program Overview .............................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Commitment of Project Partners........................................................................ 1-3 Phase 1A: Portal North Bridge Project ..................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Portal North Bridge Project Overview ................................................................ 1-4 1.4 Description of the of the PNB Project Sponsor and Funding Partners ............ 1-5 1.4.1 PNB Project Sponsor ............................................................................ 1-5 1.4.2 PNB Funding Partners .......................................................................... 1-6 1.5 Description of the Portal North Bridge Project .................................................. 1-9 1.5.1 Portal North Bridge Project Identification ........................................... 1-10 1.5.2 Portal North Bridge Setting................................................................. 1-10 1.5.3 Portal Bridge Current Conditions ....................................................... 1-10 1.5.4 Portal North Bridge Project Purpose .................................................. 1-12 1.5.5 Portal North Bridge Project Summary ................................................ 1-13 Phase 1B: Hudson Tunnel Project .......................................................................................... 1-14 1.6 Hudson Tunnel Project Overview .................................................................... 1-14 1.6.1 Status of Environmental Review ........................................................ 1-15 1.7 Description of the of the HTP Sponsor and Supporting Partners .................. 1-16 1.7.1 HTP Project Sponsor .......................................................................... 1-16 1.7.2 HTP Supporting Partners ................................................................... 1-16 1.7.3 HTP Funding Partners ........................................................................ 1-17 1.8 Description of the Hudson Tunnel Project ....................................................... 1-19 1.8.1 Hudson Tunnel Project Identification ................................................. 1-19 1.8.2 Hudson Tunnel Project Setting .......................................................... 1-20 1.8.3 Hudson Tunnel Project Current Conditions ....................................... 1-22 1.8.4 Hudson Tunnel Project Purpose ........................................................ 1-23 1.8.5 Hudson Tunnel Project Summary ...................................................... 1-25 3.0 HUDSON TUNNEL PROJECT FINANCIAL PLAN ....................................................... 3-1 3.1 Financial Plan Revisions since FTA Fiscal Year 2020 Rating ......................... 3-3 3.1.1 Status of Environmental Review .......................................................... 3-5 3.2 Capital Plan ........................................................................................................ 3-6 3.2.1 Preliminary Contract Packaging Approach .......................................... 3-7 3.2.2 Capital Plan Sources of Funds............................................................. 3-8 3.2.3 Capital Financing Strategy ................................................................. 3-25 3.2.4 Capital Plan Uses of Funds ................................................................ 3-28 3.2.5 Capital Sources and Uses of Funds .................................................. 3-43 3.3 Operating Plan .................................................................................................. 3-48 3.3.1 Infrastructure Operating Plan ............................................................. 3-48 3.3.2 Rail Service Operating Plan ............................................................... 3-55 3.4 Risks and Uncertainties ................................................................................... 3-57 3.4.1 Capital Plan ......................................................................................... 3-58 PORTAL NORTH BRIDGE and HUDSON TUNNEL PROJECT August 2019 Page i Hudson Tunnel Project Financial Plan 3.4.2 Operating and Maintenance Plan ...................................................... 3-66 3.4.3 Mitigation Strategies ........................................................................... 3-66 3.4.4 Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................. 3-67 4.0 NJ TRANSIT SYSTEM-WIDE FINANCIAL PLAN ......................................................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Capital Plan ........................................................................................................ 4-2 4.2.1 Historic Capital Plan Sources of Funds ............................................... 4-2 4.2.2 Historic Capital Plan Uses of Funds .................................................... 4-3 4.2.3 Forecast Capital Plan Sources of Funds ............................................. 4-4 4.2.4 Forecast Capital Plan Uses of Funds .................................................. 4-7 4.3 Operating Plan .................................................................................................... 4-9 4.3.1 Historic Operating Sources of Funds ................................................... 4-9 4.3.2 Historic Operating Uses of Funds ...................................................... 4-11 4.3.3 Forecast Operating Budget ................................................................ 4-13 4.4 New Jersey Transit Risks and Uncertainties .................................................. 4-17 4.4.1 Bus and Rail Fleet Age ....................................................................... 4-17 4.4.2 NJTTF Financial Stability ................................................................... 4-18 4.4.3 NJ TRANSIT Liquidity ......................................................................... 4-21 Appendix A – Summary of Regional Economic Forecasts Appendix B – PANYNJ Financial Information Appendix C – List of Supporting Documents Appendix D – Local Financial Commitment Checklist PORTAL NORTH BRIDGE and HUDSON TUNNEL PROJECT August 2019 Page ii Hudson Tunnel Project Financial Plan List of Acronyms Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corporation BCC Baseline Capital Charge BCI Building Cost Index CAA Clean Air Act CAGR Compound Annual Growth Rate CCI Construction Cost Index CCIP Contractor Controlled Insurance Program CE Categorical Exclusion CEO Chief Executive Officer CIG Capital Investment Grant CM Construction Manager CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Commission Gateway Development Commission Corporation Gateway Program Development Corporation CPI Consumer Price Index CRP Credit Risk Premium DEA David Evans and Associates, Inc. DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement DSCR Debt Service Coverage Ratio DVRPC Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission EDA Economic Development Authority EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESB Emergency Services Building ESWA Early Systems Work Agreement FAST Act Fixing American’s Surface Transportation Act FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FFGA Full Funding Grant Agreement FHWA Federal Highway Administration FMOC Financial Management Oversight Contractor FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration PORTAL NORTH BRIDGE and HUDSON TUNNEL PROJECT August 2019 Page iii Hudson Tunnel Project Financial Plan FY Fiscal Year GAN Grant Anticipation Notes GC General Contractor HTP Hudson Tunnel Project HYCC Hudson Yards Concrete Casing LIRR Long Island Rail Road LONP Letter of No Prejudice MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century MBTA Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MLMU Multilevel Multiple Units MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization NEC Northeast Corridor NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFPA National Fire Protection Association NJ TRANSIT New Jersey Transit NJDEP New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection NJDOT New Jersey Department of Transportation NJEDA New Jersey Economic Development Authority NJHA New Jersey Highway Authority NJTA New Jersey Turnpike Authority NJTPA North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority NJTTF New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund NJTTFA New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority NYCDOT New York City Department of Transportation NYMTC New York Metropolitan Transportation Council NYSDOT New York State Department of Transportation O&M Operations and Maintenance OCIP Owner Controlled Insurance Program OMB Office of Management and Budget P&E Planning and Expense PAB Private Activity Bond PANYNJ Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Parkway Garden State Parkway PATH Port Authority Trans-Hudson PORTAL NORTH BRIDGE and HUDSON TUNNEL PROJECT August 2019
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GATEWAY PROGRAM OVERVIEW and UPDATE John D
    January 12, 2017 GATEWAY PROGRAM OVERVIEW AND UPDATE John D. Porcari, Interim Executive Director Gateway Program Development Corporation 1 GATEWAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION » Incorporated in the state of New Jersey under Title 15A:2-8 New Jersey Domestic Nonprofit Corporation Act. » For coordinating, developing, operating, financing, managing, owning or otherwise engaging in activities to effectuate the transportation project between Penn Station, Newark, New Jersey, and Penn Station, New York, New York currently referred to as the “Gateway Program.” » Four trustees appointed by US DOT, Amtrak, NJ TRANSIT, and NYS DOT, respectively. Gateway Program Development Corporation 2 HOW IT WILL WORK Federal NJ Other/ Amtrak PANYNJ Grants TRANSIT Private Federal Gateway Program Development Loans Corporation Project Delivery NJ Amtrak TRANSIT PANYNJ Consultants/ Contractors Gateway Program Development Corporation 3 WHAT IS THE GATEWAY PROGRAM? » Hudson Tunnel Project » New Hudson River Tunnel » Rehabilitation of Existing North River Tunnel » Replacement of Portal Bridge » Expansion of Penn Station, New York » Capacity and Renewal Projects in New Jersey » Sawtooth Bridges/ Harrison » Portal South Bridge » Secaucus Station and Loops » Operating Rail Yard in NJ » Newark-Secaucus Improvements Gateway Program Development Corporation 4 WHY DO WE NEED GATEWAY? »Existing North River Tunnel, Completed in 1910 Gateway Program Development Corporation 5 SUPERSTORM SANDY CAUSED IRREPARABLE DAMAGE » Superstorm Sandy forced 4-day closure of the NEC in October 2012. » Ongoing damage to internal components requires complete renewal of inundated tunnels. » Tunnel reconstruction requires closure of each tube for outages of ~1.5 years. » Without new tunnel in place, closure would devastate service. » Rebuilding of the existing North River Tunnel will not begin until the new Hudson Tunnel is built and commissioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Front Line Personnel to Provide Quality Customer Service
    Best Foot Forward: Training Front Line Personnel to Provide Quality Customer Service NOVEMBER 2003 Katherine Brower Associate Director Ellyn Shannon Transportation Planner Karyl Berger Research Associate Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the professional and courteous customer assistance provided to them by personnel at all the transportation agencies contacted during the preparation of this report. This report has been a work in progress for many months and there are many people the authors would like to recognize for their time, assistance and perseverance in obtaining and sharing volumes of information with us. At the LIRR, special thanks go to Director of Government Affairs Janet Lewis who helped coordinate meetings and garnered the information from a variety of departments and personnel. Also at the LIRR, we would like to thank: Robert Cividanes, Donald Corkery, James Coumatos, Dr. John Diekman, Nathaniel Ham, Raymond P. Kenny, Rosanne Neville, Chris Papandreou, William E. Sellerberg and Fred Wedley. Metro-North staff were instrumental in pulling together a mountain of information and we want to acknowledge and thank: Margarita Almonte, Delana Glenn, Gus Meyers, George Okvat, Mario Riccobon, John Roberto, Mark Stoessner, Tom Tendy and Diana Tucker. The authors would also like to specially thank Lois Tendler, NYC Transit director of Government and Community Relations and Deborah Hall-Moore, Assistant director of Government and Community Relations. Without them, we would have never been able to complete this report. Also at NYC Transit, we would like to thank: Ralph Agritelley, Fred Benjamin, Rocco Cortese, Nathaniel Ford, Termaine Garden, John Gaul, Daniel Girardi, Anthony Giudice, John Grass, Kevin Hyland, Christopher Lake, Robert Newhouser, Louis Nicosia, Millard Seay, Barbara Spencer, Jennifer Sinclair and Steve Vidal.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual-Mode Locomotive Requirements Document
    Standardized Technical Specification PRIIA Du a l Mode (DC) Passenger Locomotive Requirements Document Is su e Revis ion 1.3 Adopted by the Executive Board December 6 th, 2011 Copyright 2011 Amtrak All rights reserved Table of Contents 1-1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction [Informative] ........................................................................................ 1-2 1.1 PRIIA Mandated Requirements ............................................................................ 1-2 1.1.1 Tech n ica l: ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.2 Process: ......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Operational Considerations ................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.1 Th e Specification to Be Developed .................................................................. 1-3 1.2.2 Passenger Train Access to New York City ........................................................ 1-3 2.0 Requirements [Normative unless otherwise in dica ted] ............................................... 2-1 2.1 Key Requ irem en ts ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Capacity and Locomotive Performance ................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Dimensions, Clearances and Track Geometry....................................................... 2-2 2.3.1 Overall Carbody Dimensions
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2010 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2010 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 53, No. 2 February, 2010 The Bulletin NOR’EASTER HITS EASTERN SEABOARD Published by the New Although the “official” start of winter was not boarded a following train that got them to York Division, Electric until Monday, December 21, 2009, the first Ronkonkoma at 8:45 when they were sched- Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box major winter storm, a Nor’easter, traveled up uled to arrive at 4:14 AM. Thanks to member 3001, New York, New the eastern seaboard, arriving in the metro- Larry Kiss, who filled in some details. York 10008-3001. politan area Saturday afternoon, December Later that day, at 8:45 PM, service was sus- 19. It continued through Sunday, December pended between Ronkonkoma and Green- 20, dumping up to 26” of snow in eastern port and there were scattered delays on the For general inquiries, contact us at nydiv@ Long Island. Portions of New Jersey also Port Jefferson, Babylon and Montauk erausa.org or by phone received significant amounts. In New York Branches. Traffic reports in the following days at (212) 986-4482 (voice City, approximately 11 inches were recorded also told of minor delays. mail available). The in Central Park, 13.2 inches in Sheepshead Our Editor-in-Chief, Bernie Linder, saw on a Division’s website is www.erausa.org/ Bay, six inches in the Bronx, and only a trace news report on Channel 7 that the lead car of nydiv.html. in Poughkeepsie. Many areas received re- each LIRR MU train, and probably also the cord amounts of snow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin BROOKLYN PCC CARS’ 80 ANNIVERSARY
    ERA BULLETIN — DECEMBER, 2016 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 59, No. 12 December, 2016 TH The Bulletin BROOKLYN PCC CARS’ 80 ANNIVERSARY Published by the Electric by Bernard Linder Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box (Continued from November, 2016 issue) 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. As soon as the cars were in service, news- dynamic brake came into service first and papers reported that the passengers liked was increased as the brake foot pedal was For general inquiries, or the quiet, fast, comfortable cars. St. Louis depressed. At 3-inch pedal movement, the Bulletin submissions, Car Company’s booklet explains how the track brake cut in. The air brake completed contact us at bulletin@ company accomplished this feat. the braking cycle and held the car after it erausa.org. ERA’s The designers proceeded to develop a radi- stopped. Your Editor-in-Chief’s supervisor website is cally new control and braking apparatus for recalled that the Brooklyn cars’ magnetic www.erausa.org. smooth and rapid starts and stops. To deter- brakes were disconnected after they wore Editorial Staff: mine the maximum comfortable acceleration, out the track rails at the trolley stops. The Editor-in-Chief: your Editor-in-Chief’s supervisor sat in a car PCC’s brakes gave rates of retardation that Bernard Linder loaded with sandbags. Tests were conducted were not previously achieved. Tri-State News and in the Ninth Avenue Depot at different rates The PCCs were much quieter than the old- Commuter Rail Editor: Ronald Yee of acceleration and deceleration. These ex- er cars.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5: Freight Movement
    3.5 Freight Movement 3.5 Freight Movement A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the characteristics of the existing rail freight services and railroad operators in the project area. Also addressed is the relationship between those services and Build Alternative long-term operations. The study area contains several rail freight lines and yards that play key roles in the movement of goods to and from the Port of New York and New Jersey, the largest port on the east coast, as well as in the movement of goods vital to businesses and residents in multiple states. However, no long-term freight movement impacts are anticipated with the Build Alternative, and no mitigation measures will be required. B. SERVICE TYPES The following freight rail services are offered in the project area: • Containerized or “inter-modal” consists primarily of containers or Example of Doublestack Train with Maritime truck trailers moved on rail cars. Containers Intermodal rail traffic is considered the fastest growing rail freight market, and is anticipated to grow in the region between 3.9 and 5.6 percent annually through 2030, based on the NJTPA Freight System Performance Study (see Table 3.5-1). • Carload traffic consists of products that are typically moved in boxcars, hopper cars, tank cars, and special lumber cars over a long distance by rail, and then either transported directly by rail or Example of Carload Rail Traffic shifted to truck for delivery to more local customers. The characteristics of these commodities (e.g., bulk, heavy or over- dimensional) make rail the preferred option for long-distance movement.
    [Show full text]
  • North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines: Hoboken & New York
    North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines: Hoboken & New York - Bay Head & Dover © Copyright Dovetail Games 2015, all rights reserved Release Version 1.1 Page 1 Train Simulator – North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines 1 ROUTE INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 5 1.1 The Route ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Route Map ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Focus Time Period .................................................................................................. 5 2 GETTING STARTED ......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Recommended Minimum Hardware Specification .......................................................... 6 3 ROLLING STOCK............................................................................................. 7 3.1 Comet IV Cab Car .................................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Cab Controls ........................................................................................... 8 3.2 NJT ALP-45DP ....................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Cab Controls ........................................................................................... 9 3.3 NJT ALP-46 ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North)
    Appendix B Capital Plan Project Sheets Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North) Description The existing Portal Bridge is a ±960-foot long structure which carries the Existing: Portal Bridge Northeast Corridor (NEC) over the Hackensack River between Newark Penn Station and Secaucus Junction. The existing movable, swing span bridge was constructed in 1910, is 110-years old, and has exceeded its originally intended service life. Due to its age and frequency of use, the movable bridge is costly and difficult to maintain and experiences frequent breakdowns. The two-track bridge creates a bottleneck between the four-track territories to the east and west and requires train speed reductions of 30% which contributes to a decrease in rail service reliability. Given its low vertical clearance to the river, frequent bridge openings are required to accommodate marine traffic. Also, mechanical component malfunctions often cause the bridge to be open for extended periods of time, resulting in frequent, lengthy delays of rail service on the NEC. Additionally, the existing bridge does not have enough capacity to accommodate anticipated future demand. If funded, this project would replace the existing bridge with a higher, more reliable, double track fixed bridge on a new alignment to the north of the existing bridge. The increased vertical profile would eliminate interruptions to rail service due to required bridge openings. The new north bridge would also eliminate speed restrictions, thereby improving Proposed: New Bridge rail operation and capacity across the span. A second, two-track southern bridge, Portal South, is contemplated separately as part of the overall Gateway Program, which when complete would substantially increase operational capacity along this critical length of the NEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Pascack Valley Line Timetable
    Station location and parking information can be found at njtransit.com know before you go fare options Accessible Station Bus Route Community Shuttle Light Rail Travel Information Before starting your trip, Purchasing Tickets Ticket Prices saving you time and money Ticket Vending Machines are available at all stations AB AmeriBus CR Coach USA visit njtransit.com for updated service information tickets your way how much depends on how frequently & how far (Rockland Coaches) EZ EZ Ride/Meadowlink TOR Transport of Rockland TZX Tappan Zee Express P LINE and access to DepartureVision which provides your We want to make your travel convenient AB11C, CR11A, CR45, TOR59, ASCACK train track and status. You can also sign up for free My and economical, so we offer lots of options: TOR91, TOR92, TOR94, TOR-Loop3, Weekend, Holiday TZX Transit alerts to receive up-to-the-moment delay infor- on-board trains Monthly Passes Unlimited trips within a calendar month; can be SPRING VALLEY LEY mation on your cell phone or web-enabled mobile device, avoid Train personnel can accept cash only (no VA L New York Hoboken purchased beginning at 5:00 p.m. on the 19th of the month prior and are valid and Special Service AB11C, CR11A, CR20, Nanuet or via email. To learn about other methods we use to commu- bills over $20). All tickets purchased on- the $ L 5 until noon on the first commuting weekday of the following month. TOR59, TOR93 LEY nicate with you, visit njtransit.com/InTheKnow. alley VA board are subject to an additional $5 surcharge one-way one-way weekly monthly 10-trip one-way one-way weekly monthly 10-trip Information Zones STATIONS reduced reduced Weekly Passes Unlimited trips from 12:01 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Goals and Objectives Ii. Land Use Plan
    I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GOALS ........................................................................................................................................................ I-2 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. I-3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................. I-3 Housing.................................................................................................................................................... I-7 Circulation ................................................................................................................................................ I-8 Economic Development ......................................................................................................................... I-10 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................... I-11 Conservation ......................................................................................................................................... I-12 Community Facilities ............................................................................................................................. I-13 Parks and Recreation ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
    [Show full text]