DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North) Appendix B Capital Plan Project Sheets Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North) Description The existing Portal Bridge is a ±960-foot long structure which carries the Existing: Portal Bridge Northeast Corridor (NEC) over the Hackensack River between Newark Penn Station and Secaucus Junction. The existing movable, swing span bridge was constructed in 1910, is 110-years old, and has exceeded its originally intended service life. Due to its age and frequency of use, the movable bridge is costly and difficult to maintain and experiences frequent breakdowns. The two-track bridge creates a bottleneck between the four-track territories to the east and west and requires train speed reductions of 30% which contributes to a decrease in rail service reliability. Given its low vertical clearance to the river, frequent bridge openings are required to accommodate marine traffic. Also, mechanical component malfunctions often cause the bridge to be open for extended periods of time, resulting in frequent, lengthy delays of rail service on the NEC. Additionally, the existing bridge does not have enough capacity to accommodate anticipated future demand. If funded, this project would replace the existing bridge with a higher, more reliable, double track fixed bridge on a new alignment to the north of the existing bridge. The increased vertical profile would eliminate interruptions to rail service due to required bridge openings. The new north bridge would also eliminate speed restrictions, thereby improving Proposed: New Bridge rail operation and capacity across the span. A second, two-track southern bridge, Portal South, is contemplated separately as part of the overall Gateway Program, which when complete would substantially increase operational capacity along this critical length of the NEC. *ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS (2020 Dollars): ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS (2020 Dollars): $1.873 Billion Value to Customers • Increases on-time performance (OTP), safety, and service reliability * Total estimated 2020 project cost indicates total cost over span of • Accommodates NEC ridership growth 2009-2019 the project and includes funds already spent. Value to State • Lowers operating expenses to enable more efficient use of public funds • Reduces potential injuries by decreasing on-site maintenance work • Increases return on investment (ROI) from increased ridership PROJECT SHEET PORTAL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (PORTAL NORTH) O&M Costs/Business Performance Track outages would be reduced, and costly maintenance and manual bridge opening would no longer be needed ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Service Reliability/On-Time Performance The new bridge would vastly improve reliability and *$1.873B allow for further service improvements *TOTAL ESTIMATED 2020 PROJECT COST INDICATES TOTAL COST OVER SPAN OF STRATEGIC GOALS MET THE PROJECT AND INCLUDES FUNDS ALREADY SPENT Deliver a high-quality experience for all Ensure the reliability our customers, with and continued safety their entire journey in of our transit system mind Ridership/Capacity A double track fixed bridge would accommodate more trains and ridership growth The project would eliminate interruptions to rail service due Network Impact Delays resulting from bridge openings and to bridge openings and speed speed restrictions would be eliminated along a critical portion of the NEC restrictions to improve rail operation and capacity. Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Capacity Enhancement (Portal South) Description The existing Portal Bridge carries the Northeast Corridor over the Future Portal North Bridge Hackensack River between Newark Penn Station and Secaucus Junction. The existing movable, swing span bridge was constructed in 1910 (109-years old) and has exceeded its originally intended service life. Due to its age and frequency of use given, the movable bridge is costly and difficult to maintain. The existing two-track bridge creates a bottleneck between the four-track territories to the east and west, conflicts with marine traffic, and restricts operating speeds by 30% which all contribute to reductions in service reliability. Recurring bridge openings coupled with mechanical component malfunctions cause the bridge to be open for long periods of time, resulting in frequent, lengthy delays on the corridor. The existing double track bridge does not have enough capacity to accommodate current demand on the corridor. While the new two track Portal North bridge will have expanded Proposed: New Portal South Crossing capacity providing higher allowable trains speeds, future demand must Adjacent to Portal North Bridge include an additional two tracks of capacity to keep pace with growth trends. If funded, Portal South Bridge would provide two additional tracks across the Hackensack River, matching the four-track territories to the east and west, substantially increasing operational capacity along this critical length of the Northeast Corridor. Unlike proposed Portal North Bridge, Amtrak Acela service would not need to be supported on the new south crossing. As a result, several structure alternatives could ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS (2020 Dollars): be feasible for a proposed Portal South Bridge, including a movable span along the existing right of way, providing an opportunity for reduced approach work and significant cost savings. This project would be a key component of the Gateway Capacity Enhancement Value to Customers Program. • Increased on-time-performance (OTP), safety, and service reliability *Similar to Raritan River Bridge ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS (2020 Dollars): Value to State • Lowers operating expenses and uses public funds efficiently • Reduces potential injuries associated with increased on-site maintenance work $431 Million • Increases return on investment (ROI) from increased ridership PROJECT SHEET PORTAL BRIDGE CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT (PORTAL SOUTH) O&M Costs/Business Performance Resulting increase in line capacity and redundancy would decrease operating expenses and allow for increased ridership ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Network Impact The new bridge would improve operations by relieving congestion and increasing capacity along a critically $431M important portion of the NEC STRATEGIC GOALS MET Deliver a high-quality experience for all Ensure the reliability our customers, with and continued safety their entire journey in of our transit system mind Ridership/Capacity Double track bridge would increase line capacity to accommodate more trains and ridership growth Portal South would increase line Service Reliability/On-Time Performance New bridge would be operationally capacity and improve operations redundant to reduce delays and make service more reliable along the NEC. Project Sheet | Penn Station New York – NJ TRANSIT Access Improvements Description Existing Station Corridors New York Penn Station serves as a major rail hub for the Long Island Rail Road, Amtrak and NJ TRANSIT. As the busiest terminal station for NJ TRANSIT rail operations, Penn Station New York services Northeast Corridor, North Jersey Coast, Raritan Valley (limited), Morris and Essex, Gladstone, and Montclair Boonton Lines. During peak periods, NJ TRANSIT typically operates on 12 of the terminal’s 21 tracks, sharing platform space with Amtrak. There are serious vertical access and egress issues between platforms which serve NJ TRANSIT trains and station concourse levels. These issues are exacerbated by limited access points within the station and by current separation between the main East and West End concourses. This project would extend the existing Central Concourse to allow for more vertical access to existing train platforms serving NJ TRANSIT, improve the existing Hilton Corridor so it better connects between vertical access points to platforms, and improve signage and wayfinding to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of passengers and visitors. A new accessible entrance between the extended concourse and the street level would be created. These enhancements target commuter safety and convenience to increase capacity and improve passenger experience. *ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS (2020 Dollars): Value to Customers • Enhances travel experience with new facilities $340 Million • Improves signage and communications to relay station information and rail service status *Estimates are based upon concept for design • Streamlines passenger movement between station and platforms Value to State • Increase safety of passengers by reduction of overcrowding on station platforms • Reduces delays associated with slower passenger egress PROJECT SHEET PENN STATION NEW YORK - NJ TRANSIT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS Comfort New platform access points, signage, and wayfinding would streamline and enhance customer movements ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Safety Platform congestion would be reduced by adding new vertical access and egress points, signage, and $340M wayfinding STRATEGIC GOALS MET Deliver a high-quality experience for all Ensure the reliability our customers, with and continued safety their entire journey in of our transit system mind Network Impact Improving access to platforms at NJ TRANSIT’s biggest terminal station would reduce delays Access improvements at Penn State of Good Repair Station New York would enhance Building new infrastructure would reduce regular customer access disruptions and travel experience, increase increase capacity safety, and reduce delays. Project Sheet | Hoboken Terminal and Yard Resilient Redevelopment Program – Phase I Description Hoboken Terminal is one of NJ TRANSIT’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GATEWAY PROGRAM OVERVIEW and UPDATE John D
    January 12, 2017 GATEWAY PROGRAM OVERVIEW AND UPDATE John D. Porcari, Interim Executive Director Gateway Program Development Corporation 1 GATEWAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION » Incorporated in the state of New Jersey under Title 15A:2-8 New Jersey Domestic Nonprofit Corporation Act. » For coordinating, developing, operating, financing, managing, owning or otherwise engaging in activities to effectuate the transportation project between Penn Station, Newark, New Jersey, and Penn Station, New York, New York currently referred to as the “Gateway Program.” » Four trustees appointed by US DOT, Amtrak, NJ TRANSIT, and NYS DOT, respectively. Gateway Program Development Corporation 2 HOW IT WILL WORK Federal NJ Other/ Amtrak PANYNJ Grants TRANSIT Private Federal Gateway Program Development Loans Corporation Project Delivery NJ Amtrak TRANSIT PANYNJ Consultants/ Contractors Gateway Program Development Corporation 3 WHAT IS THE GATEWAY PROGRAM? » Hudson Tunnel Project » New Hudson River Tunnel » Rehabilitation of Existing North River Tunnel » Replacement of Portal Bridge » Expansion of Penn Station, New York » Capacity and Renewal Projects in New Jersey » Sawtooth Bridges/ Harrison » Portal South Bridge » Secaucus Station and Loops » Operating Rail Yard in NJ » Newark-Secaucus Improvements Gateway Program Development Corporation 4 WHY DO WE NEED GATEWAY? »Existing North River Tunnel, Completed in 1910 Gateway Program Development Corporation 5 SUPERSTORM SANDY CAUSED IRREPARABLE DAMAGE » Superstorm Sandy forced 4-day closure of the NEC in October 2012. » Ongoing damage to internal components requires complete renewal of inundated tunnels. » Tunnel reconstruction requires closure of each tube for outages of ~1.5 years. » Without new tunnel in place, closure would devastate service. » Rebuilding of the existing North River Tunnel will not begin until the new Hudson Tunnel is built and commissioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Restoration of Passenger Rail Service on the West Trenton Line
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
    [Show full text]
  • Portal Bridge Fact Sheet Summer 2015V2.Indd
    PORTAL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT The Portal Bridge Replacement Project will replace an aging obsolete bridge with a new fi xed-span bridge resulti ng in enhanced capacity and reliability along the Northeast Corridor. PROJECT OVERVIEW The Portal Bridge is a two-track, moveable, swing-span bridge PROJECT SUMMARY that crosses over the Hackensack River in Hudson County, New Timeline Esti mated 5-year constructi on period Jersey connecti ng Newark, New Jersey and Penn Stati on, New York. This secti on of the Northeast Corridor is used solely by Am- Cost $940 million (2013 esti mate) trak and New Jersey Transit commuter rail service. Constructed Partners New Jersey Transit, Amtrak and US DOT Federal Rail- over a century ago, the bridge is one of the oldest pieces of infra- road Administrati on structure along the Northeast Corridor. Due to its age and inten- sity of use, the bridge is costly and diffi cult to maintain in work- ing order. The bridge, which hosts about 450 trains per weekday, was esti mated to cost approximately $940 million in 2013 dol- creates a bott leneck along the busy Northeast Corridor that con- lars and will proceed with the cooperati on of New Jersey Tran- fl icts with marine traffi c, limits operati ng speeds and impedes sit and Amtrak, as soon as funding can be secured. The recently effi cient and reliable passenger rail service. The bridge requires completed design process involved a preliminary design phase replacement in order to meet expected future travel demand. for which costs of $31 million were shared between New Jersey Transit and Amtrak, and fi nal design, funded by a Federal Rail- Amtrak and New Jersey Transit have completed several planning road Administrati on grant of $38.5 million.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5: Freight Movement
    3.5 Freight Movement 3.5 Freight Movement A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the characteristics of the existing rail freight services and railroad operators in the project area. Also addressed is the relationship between those services and Build Alternative long-term operations. The study area contains several rail freight lines and yards that play key roles in the movement of goods to and from the Port of New York and New Jersey, the largest port on the east coast, as well as in the movement of goods vital to businesses and residents in multiple states. However, no long-term freight movement impacts are anticipated with the Build Alternative, and no mitigation measures will be required. B. SERVICE TYPES The following freight rail services are offered in the project area: • Containerized or “inter-modal” consists primarily of containers or Example of Doublestack Train with Maritime truck trailers moved on rail cars. Containers Intermodal rail traffic is considered the fastest growing rail freight market, and is anticipated to grow in the region between 3.9 and 5.6 percent annually through 2030, based on the NJTPA Freight System Performance Study (see Table 3.5-1). • Carload traffic consists of products that are typically moved in boxcars, hopper cars, tank cars, and special lumber cars over a long distance by rail, and then either transported directly by rail or Example of Carload Rail Traffic shifted to truck for delivery to more local customers. The characteristics of these commodities (e.g., bulk, heavy or over- dimensional) make rail the preferred option for long-distance movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Portal Bridge Capacity Enhancement Project FEIS
    Chapter 4: Transportation Effects A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY This chapter assesses the potential impacts of the project alternatives on transportation conditions in the New York-New Jersey metropolitan area and the entire Northeast Corridor. Since the Portal Bridge is a vital link on the Northeast Corridor, the project alternatives could result in effects over a larger area than many of the other environmental resources examined in this FEIS. The effects of the project alternatives on the capacity and reliability of Amtrak and NJ TRANSIT’s crossing of the Hackensack River could have a positive effect on regional and commuter rail travel along the Northeast Corridor. This could lead to changes in travel patterns and modes that are discussed below. Therefore, the transportation impact assessment includes a discussion of regional issues, with a focus on the critical trans-Hudson corridor. The analysis presented in this chapter includes an evaluation of current and future transportation infrastructure within the project study area, including intercity rail, public transportation (including public and private bus service, commuter and light rail, and ferry services), navigable waters, and the roadway system. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS The importance of public transportation (including bus, rail, and ferry) in northern and central New Jersey is reflected in the mode shares for the different types of trips made in the region. As shown in Table 4-1, while intra-New Jersey trips were predominately auto-based, trans-Hudson trips are evenly split between automobiles and public transportation. This illustrates the importance of public transportation in providing access to New York City for employment, entertainment, shopping, education, and other trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Pascack Valley Line Timetable
    Station location and parking information can be found at njtransit.com know before you go fare options Accessible Station Bus Route Community Shuttle Light Rail Travel Information Before starting your trip, Purchasing Tickets Ticket Prices saving you time and money Ticket Vending Machines are available at all stations AB AmeriBus CR Coach USA visit njtransit.com for updated service information tickets your way how much depends on how frequently & how far (Rockland Coaches) EZ EZ Ride/Meadowlink TOR Transport of Rockland TZX Tappan Zee Express P LINE and access to DepartureVision which provides your We want to make your travel convenient AB11C, CR11A, CR45, TOR59, ASCACK train track and status. You can also sign up for free My and economical, so we offer lots of options: TOR91, TOR92, TOR94, TOR-Loop3, Weekend, Holiday TZX Transit alerts to receive up-to-the-moment delay infor- on-board trains Monthly Passes Unlimited trips within a calendar month; can be SPRING VALLEY LEY mation on your cell phone or web-enabled mobile device, avoid Train personnel can accept cash only (no VA L New York Hoboken purchased beginning at 5:00 p.m. on the 19th of the month prior and are valid and Special Service AB11C, CR11A, CR20, Nanuet or via email. To learn about other methods we use to commu- bills over $20). All tickets purchased on- the $ L 5 until noon on the first commuting weekday of the following month. TOR59, TOR93 LEY nicate with you, visit njtransit.com/InTheKnow. alley VA board are subject to an additional $5 surcharge one-way one-way weekly monthly 10-trip one-way one-way weekly monthly 10-trip Information Zones STATIONS reduced reduced Weekly Passes Unlimited trips from 12:01 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Goals and Objectives Ii. Land Use Plan
    I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GOALS ........................................................................................................................................................ I-2 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. I-3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................. I-3 Housing.................................................................................................................................................... I-7 Circulation ................................................................................................................................................ I-8 Economic Development ......................................................................................................................... I-10 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................... I-11 Conservation ......................................................................................................................................... I-12 Community Facilities ............................................................................................................................. I-13 Parks and Recreation ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Hoboken Terminal and Yard Phase I Redevelopment Plan First Community Meeting
    Hoboken Terminal and Yard Phase I Redevelopment Plan First Community Meeting May 31, 2011 One Hudson Place – Phase I Redevelopment Plan Hoboken Terminal and Rail Yards Redevelopment Plan First Community Meeting Agenda 1. Redevelopment Planning Process and Outcomes 2. Previous Planning Efforts and NJ Transit Program 3. Community Concerns and Priorities 4. Site Constraints and Opportunities 5. Breakout Sessions Hoboken Terminal and Rail Yards Phase I Redevelopment Plan 2 City of Hoboken, NJ The Honorable Mayor Zimmer City of Hoboken, NJ Brandy Forbes, AICP, PP CitCommunity DltDevelopment DitDirector City of Hoboken, NJ Project Consultant Team Planners and Urban Designers, Landscape Architects, Architects, and Community WRT Engagement Nando Micale, AICP, FAIA, PP Principal Yogesh Saoji, AIA, AICP, LEED® AP Project Manager Woo Kim, AICP, LEED® AP Urban Designer Economic and Market Analysis Robert B. Pauls Robert B. Pauls Managing Partner Barbara Cohen Remaking Northern Newburgh: Senior Associate Creating Jobs, Reviving Dormant Sites April 20th, 2011 33 Redevelopment Planning Process and Outcomes Hoboken Terminal and Rail Yards Phase I Redevelopment Plan 4 Redevelopment Plan Phase I and Full Site Boundaries • Phase I – One Hudson Place (1.8 Acres) • Full Site – Hoboken Terminal and Rail Yards (52 Acres) Hoboken Terminal and Rail Yards Phase I Redevelopment Plan 5 Redevelopment Plan Planning Process and Project Schedule • Phase I Redevelopment Plan – One Hudson Place (five months, completed by August 2011 month) • Full Site Redevelopment Plan (six months after completion of Phase I Redevelopment Plan) Hoboken Terminal and Rail Yards Phase I Redevelopment Plan 6 Redevelopment Plan Outcomes • Determine appropriate level of development program for the Terminal site.
    [Show full text]
  • Montclair's Train Stations
    Montclair’s Train Stations Compiled by Montclair History Center Trustee, Helen Fallon September, 2018 l www.montclairhistory.org l [email protected] Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue • Montclair has six train stations. • There have been three different train station buildings at this Bloomfield Avenue site. • Rail service to this Bloomfield Avenue station began in 1856, when Montclair was still known as West Bloomfield. The line was first operated by the Newark & Bloomfield Rail Company; shortly thereafter it became part of the Morris & Essex Railroad; and in 1868 the line became part of the Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad (DL&W).1 • The first station, from the mid-1800s, was fairly simple – seen in the photos and drawing that follow. • From this Montclair terminus, commuters or travelers (or goods) could ride to Hoboken, where they would switch to the ferry to New York City. Travel time was said to be 1.5 hours each way. First Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue First Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue First Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue Second Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue • The next series of maps and photos show the second station building—a bit more elegant than the first, but, in keeping with other train stations of the time, designed to accommodate freight as much as passengers. • The map details – from 1890 and 1906 – show the extensive network of sidings and some of the industrial/commercial uses around the station. • I especially enjoy the photo with the white Borden’s Condensed Milk carriages lined up next to the train—either loading or unloading.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Ed\Documents\NRHS 2017\1712 DEC RDG.Wpd
    1935 - 2017 VOLUME48NUMBER12 DISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER WEBSITE: WWW.NRHS1.ORG DECEMBER 2017 MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM THE LANCASTER CHAPTER, INC. N.R.H.S. Lancaster Dispatcher Page 2 December 2017 Holiday Travel THE MUTUAL MAGAZINE - FEBRUARY, 1941 With holiday travel at the highest peak in many years, officers of the Pennsylvania Railroad estimated that during the period from December 13 to December 24, inclusive, the movement over all divisions of the system totalled approximately 2,500,000 passengers, an increase of nearly 20% above 1939. Of this number 2,000,000 rode in coaches and 500,000 in Pullman sleeping and parlor cars. The period covered embraced practically all of the Christmas trek “back home” for family reunions and the heavy travel to Florida, as well as soldiers visiting their people on furloughs from the various encampments throughout the country. In handling this Christmas traffic, 1,314 extra sections and special trains were operated, in addition to many extra cars on regularly scheduled trains. The heaviest day was December 20, when 202 extra sections were required. There were 1,621 extra runs of Pullman cars, including 1,230 sleeping and 391 parlor car movements. To accommodate the tremendous demand for reservations to Florida, 12 extra coach trains, handling more than 4,000 passengers, were operated on PRR WARTIME HOLIDAY POSTER - 1942 four days from New York, Philadelphia and Baltimore, via the Washington COLLECTION OF THE EDITOR gateway, to leading Florida points. These were in addition to the regular daily luxury coach trains - the Silver Meteor, the Champion and the Vacationer - as well as extremely heavy Pullman travel.
    [Show full text]
  • South Jersey Transit Guide
    $ WHETHER COMMUTING WITHIN SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY— OR TO PHILADELPHIA, ATLANTIC CITY, TRENTON OR NEW YORK— TRAVELING BY TRAIN, BUS, SUBWAY OR TROLLEY CAN SAVE TIME, MONEY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT. PENNSYLVANIA TRAVELING BY TRAIN 15TH/16TH & LOCUST 12TH/13TH & LOCUST PATCO Line 9TH/10TH & LOCUST PATCO, a subsidiary of the Delaware River Port Authority, 8TH & MARKET operates train service between southern New Jersey and Philadelphia. Park/Ride facilities are available for more than 12,600 cars at seven New Jersey stations. 60% of parking CITY HALL/CAMDEN spaces are free at all times. Between 5 and 10am, paid park- ing gates accept $1 payment, for up to 24 hours parking, BROADWAY WALTER RAND TRANS. CTR. using a FREEDOM smart card. Limited metered parking is also available - $.25 for each 2 hours. FERRY AVENUE COLLINGSWOOD One-way or two-trip tickets, as well as stored value FREEDOM TRENTON smart cards, can be purchased from vending machines at each WESTMONT All pricing information is subject NJT 409, 600, 601, 604, 606, 608, 609, 611, 619 station. Tickets are intended for same day use and expire to change. Please consult with HAMILTON AVENUE All pricing information is subject to change. NJT 409, 601, 603, 609, 613, 619 NJ TRANSIT COMMUTER RAIL LINES particular carrier for most up to within 3 days of purchase. A FREEDOM card offers frequent Please consult with particular carrier for most HADDONFIELD CASS STREET date fare and schedule information. riders the convenience of loading value onto reusable smart cards. up to date fare and schedule information. BORDENTOWN Reduced price, round-trip SEPTA transfer tickets may also be WOODCREST Monthly passes are also available NJT 409 Handicapped Accessible by mail (call 1-866-784-5845) or ROEBLING purchased from the same vending machines in New Jersey River LINE NJT 409 ASHLAND on-line thru Quik-Tik at stations for use between PATCO trains and SEPTA’s Market- Park/Ride NJ TRANSIT provides commuter light rail service between B5 FLORENCE Frankford Subway/Elevated Line, Broad Street, and Ridge Trenton and Camden.
    [Show full text]