DOCSLIB.ORG

Training Front Line Personnel to Provide Quality Customer Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Training Front Line Personnel to Provide Quality Customer Service Best Foot Forward: Training Front Line Personnel to Provide Quality Customer Service NOVEMBER 2003 Katherine Brower Associate Director Ellyn Shannon Transportation Planner Karyl Berger Research Associate Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the professional and courteous customer assistance provided to them by personnel at all the transportation agencies contacted during the preparation of this report. This report has been a work in progress for many months and there are many people the authors would like to recognize for their time, assistance and perseverance in obtaining and sharing volumes of information with us. At the LIRR, special thanks go to Director of Government Affairs Janet Lewis who helped coordinate meetings and garnered the information from a variety of departments and personnel. Also at the LIRR, we would like to thank: Robert Cividanes, Donald Corkery, James Coumatos, Dr. John Diekman, Nathaniel Ham, Raymond P. Kenny, Rosanne Neville, Chris Papandreou, William E. Sellerberg and Fred Wedley. Metro-North staff were instrumental in pulling together a mountain of information and we want to acknowledge and thank: Margarita Almonte, Delana Glenn, Gus Meyers, George Okvat, Mario Riccobon, John Roberto, Mark Stoessner, Tom Tendy and Diana Tucker. The authors would also like to specially thank Lois Tendler, NYC Transit director of Government and Community Relations and Deborah Hall-Moore, Assistant director of Government and Community Relations. Without them, we would have never been able to complete this report. Also at NYC Transit, we would like to thank: Ralph Agritelley, Fred Benjamin, Rocco Cortese, Nathaniel Ford, Termaine Garden, John Gaul, Daniel Girardi, Anthony Giudice, John Grass, Kevin Hyland, Christopher Lake, Robert Newhouser, Louis Nicosia, Millard Seay, Barbara Spencer, Jennifer Sinclair and Steve Vidal. At Long Island Bus, we are truly grateful for help from James Campbell, Gail Chandler, Patricia Ibarguan, Olga Jiminez, Richard Motycka, Jane Perlson, Frank Ryan and Neil Yellin. The authors contacted a number of transit agencies around the country for this report. We greatly appreciate their efforts in providing information to us. Our thanks go to Jennifer Boubal, and Mary Joplin at Continental Airlines, Steve Kiejst and Rick Mariani at New Jersey Transit, Augustine Serio at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey’s PATH Division, Joe Gallagher at the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), Cynthia Gannaway at the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), Mary Sulmers and Dean Orbeck at the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Terry Adelman and Sadie Williams at the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Maggie Lynch and Mark Lovett at San Francisco’s Municipal Railway (MUNI) and Kevin Desmond and Lynne Cunningham at Pierce Transit in Tacoma, Washington. Special thanks go to PCAC Executive Director Beverly Dolinsky for sharing her knowledge, insights, support and editorial assistance. The authors would also like to thank PCAC Administrative Assistant Mary Whaley for her assistance and good humor in preparing the draft. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................ i - xiii INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 STUDY DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................... 2 TICKET CLERKS/STATION AGENTS ................................................................... 5 Long Island Rail Road………………………..… ............................................ 5 Metro-North Railroad……………………....................................................... 11 New York City Transit ................................................................................. 16 CUSTOMER SERVICE/TRAVEL INFORMATION REPRESENTATIVES............................................................................................. 23 Long Island Rail Road................................................................................. 23 Metro-North Railroad .................................................................................. 27 New York City Transit ................................................................................. 32 Long Island Bus.......................................................................................... 36 RAILROAD AND SUBWAY CONDUCTORS ......................................................... 40 Long Island Rail Road................................................................................. 40 Metro-North Railroad .................................................................................. 49 New York City Transit ................................................................................. 56 BUS OPERATORS ................................................................................................ 64 Long Island Bus.......................................................................................... 64 New York City Transit ................................................................................. 70 A COMPARISON OF MTA FRONT LINE PERSONNEL CUSTOMER SERVICE PRACTICES .......................................................................................................... 79 Ticket Clerks/Station Agents ....................................................................... 80 Customer Service/Travel Information .......................................................... 84 Conductors ................................................................................................. 88 Bus Operators ............................................................................................ 95 INNOVATIVE CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAINING AT U.S. TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES ............................................................................................................ 99 National Transportation Organizations ........................................................ 99 U.S Transportation Agencies.......................................................................101 RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................................................107 MTA ...........................................................................................................108 MTA Operating Agencies ............................................................................113 APPENDIX A Overview of MTA Operating Agencies .....................................................112 APPENDIX B Agency Specific Recommendations ........................................................115 APPENDIX C Glossary of Terms ....................................................................................124 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Effective communication and excellent customer service are paramount to running a successful transportation system. In fact, a recent report by the Public Agenda found that forty-six percent of people interviewed had walked out of a business in the past year due to bad customer service.1 Bad customer service results in lost business. This can translate into lost ridership in the transportation industry. Front line employees, such as ticket clerks/station service agents, travel information representatives, conductors and bus operators, provide a service, which necessitates customer communication and interaction yet employees don’t always remember that this is an important aspect of their role. Front line employees, knowingly or unknowingly, function as transportation agency “ambassadors” and strongly influence riders’ perception and experience. Public perception about transportation service plays a key role in transportation use. Effective communication and customer sensitivity require special employee skills and attitudes. Ensuring that employees are adequately prepared to fulfill their responsibilities is a recurrent process that begins during the hiring phase and continues through the initial training, monitoring and evaluation by management as well as in the ongoing provision of refresher training. Achieving excellent transportation customer service also requires effective communication among the employees themselves, which is grounded in the overall management philosophy, the handling of day-to-day operations and the use of communication technology. The Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA (PCAC)2 has long expressed the need for consistent, high quality customer service. The PCAC’s 1984 report on this topic, Passenger Relations Training Programs, Disciplinary Procedures and Incentive Programs: A Comparison of MTA Affiliates to Public Transit Agencies Around the United States, recommended that the MTA implement a number of measures to improve training, disciplinary and reward programs for front line employees. Recommendations for customer service training included the need for knowledgeable and trained instructors, continued managerial and supervisory staff support and special skills workshops. 1 Public Agenda (2002) Aggravating Circumstances: A Status Report on Rudeness in America. 2 The PCAC is the coordinating body and funding mechanism for the three councils created by the New York State Legislature in 1981: the Long Island Rail Road Commuter’s Council (LIRRCC); the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council (MNRCC); and the New York City Transit Riders Council (NYCTRC). The Councils were created to give
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2010 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2010 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 53, No. 2 February, 2010 The Bulletin NOR’EASTER HITS EASTERN SEABOARD Published by the New Although the “official” start of winter was not boarded a following train that got them to York Division, Electric until Monday, December 21, 2009, the first Ronkonkoma at 8:45 when they were sched- Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box major winter storm, a Nor’easter, traveled up uled to arrive at 4:14 AM. Thanks to member 3001, New York, New the eastern seaboard, arriving in the metro- Larry Kiss, who filled in some details. York 10008-3001. politan area Saturday afternoon, December Later that day, at 8:45 PM, service was sus- 19. It continued through Sunday, December pended between Ronkonkoma and Green- 20, dumping up to 26” of snow in eastern port and there were scattered delays on the For general inquiries, contact us at nydiv@ Long Island. Portions of New Jersey also Port Jefferson, Babylon and Montauk erausa.org or by phone received significant amounts. In New York Branches. Traffic reports in the following days at (212) 986-4482 (voice City, approximately 11 inches were recorded also told of minor delays. mail available). The in Central Park, 13.2 inches in Sheepshead Our Editor-in-Chief, Bernie Linder, saw on a Division’s website is www.erausa.org/ Bay, six inches in the Bronx, and only a trace news report on Channel 7 that the lead car of nydiv.html. in Poughkeepsie. Many areas received re- each LIRR MU train, and probably also the cord amounts of snow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin BROOKLYN PCC CARS’ 80 ANNIVERSARY
    ERA BULLETIN — DECEMBER, 2016 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 59, No. 12 December, 2016 TH The Bulletin BROOKLYN PCC CARS’ 80 ANNIVERSARY Published by the Electric by Bernard Linder Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box (Continued from November, 2016 issue) 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. As soon as the cars were in service, news- dynamic brake came into service first and papers reported that the passengers liked was increased as the brake foot pedal was For general inquiries, or the quiet, fast, comfortable cars. St. Louis depressed. At 3-inch pedal movement, the Bulletin submissions, Car Company’s booklet explains how the track brake cut in. The air brake completed contact us at bulletin@ company accomplished this feat. the braking cycle and held the car after it erausa.org. ERA’s The designers proceeded to develop a radi- stopped. Your Editor-in-Chief’s supervisor website is cally new control and braking apparatus for recalled that the Brooklyn cars’ magnetic www.erausa.org. smooth and rapid starts and stops. To deter- brakes were disconnected after they wore Editorial Staff: mine the maximum comfortable acceleration, out the track rails at the trolley stops. The Editor-in-Chief: your Editor-in-Chief’s supervisor sat in a car PCC’s brakes gave rates of retardation that Bernard Linder loaded with sandbags. Tests were conducted were not previously achieved. Tri-State News and in the Ninth Avenue Depot at different rates The PCCs were much quieter than the old- Commuter Rail Editor: Ronald Yee of acceleration and deceleration. These ex- er cars.
    [Show full text]
  • M7 Electric Multiple Unitанаnew York
    Electric Multiple Unit -M- 7 POWERCAR WITH TOILET ---10' 6' B END FEND I 3,200 mi , -: -" 0 C==- ~=0 :- CJCJ ~~[] CJCJCJCJCJCJ [] I D b 01 " ~) -1::1 1211-1/2 t~J ~~W ~~IL...I ~w -A'-'1~~~- I ~~ 309~mmt ~ 1 I~ 11 m 2205~16~m-! 591..1.6" mm --I I 1- -- 59°6" ° 4°8-1/2. , ~ 16,~:,60~m ~-- -;cl 10435mm ~ .-1 25.908 mm F END GENERAL DATA wheelchair locations 2 type of vehicle electric multiple unit passenger per car (seated) under design operator Metropolitan Transportation Authority passengers per car (standing) crush load under design Long Island Railroad order date May 1999 TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS quantity 113 power cars without toilet .power fed by third rail: 400-900 Vdc 113 power cars with toilet .auxiliary voltages: 230 Vac / 3 ph / 60 Hz train consist up to 14 cars 72 Vdc .AC traction motor: 265 hp (200 kW) DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHf Metric Imperial .dynamic and pneumatic (tread & disc) braking system length over coupler 25,908 mm 85'0" .coil spring primary suspension width over side sheets 3,200 mm 10'6" .air-bag secondary suspension rail to roof height 3,950 mm 12' II Y;" .stainless steel carbody rail to top of floor height I ,295 mm 51" .fabricated steel frame trucks rail to top of height 4,039 mm 13' 3" .automatic parking brake doorway width 1,270 mm 50" .forced-air ventilation doorway height 1,981 mm 6'6" .air-conditioning capacity of 18 tons floor to high ceiling height 2,261 mm 89" .electric strip heaters floor to low ceiling height 2,007 mm 79" .ADA compliant toilet room (8 car) wheel diameter 914 mm 36" .vacuum sewage system
    [Show full text]
  • North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines: Hoboken & New York
    North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines: Hoboken & New York - Bay Head & Dover © Copyright Dovetail Games 2015, all rights reserved Release Version 1.1 Page 1 Train Simulator – North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines 1 ROUTE INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 5 1.1 The Route ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Route Map ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Focus Time Period .................................................................................................. 5 2 GETTING STARTED ......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Recommended Minimum Hardware Specification .......................................................... 6 3 ROLLING STOCK............................................................................................. 7 3.1 Comet IV Cab Car .................................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Cab Controls ........................................................................................... 8 3.2 NJT ALP-45DP ....................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Cab Controls ........................................................................................... 9 3.3 NJT ALP-46 ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MTA Capital Program 2008–2013
    MTA Capital Program 2008–2013 February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Overview: The MTA 2008-2013 Capital Program-- - i - “Building for the Future on a Firm Foundation” 2008-2013 Introduction: Investment Summary and Program Funding - 1 - I. Core CPRB Capital Program - 7 - MTA NYC Transit 2008-2013 Capital Program - 13 - Overview Program Plan MTA Long Island Rail Road 2008-2013 Capital Program - 45 - Overview Program Plan MTA Metro-North Railroad 2008-2013 Capital Program - 73 - Overview Program Plan MTA Bus Company 2008-2013 Capital Program - 101 - Overview Program Plan MTA Security 2008-2013 Capital Program - 111 - Overview Introduction MTA Interagency 2008-2013 Capital Program - 115 - Overview Program Plan II. Capacity Expansion - 123 - Completing the Current Expansion Projects: MTA Capital Construction Company: - 125 - Overview Program plan East Side Access Second Avenue Subway Fulton Street Transit Center South Ferry Terminal Regional Investments Miscellaneous 2005-2009 Capital Program New Capacity Expansion Investments - 141 - Overview Investments to Implement Congestion Pricing New Capacity Expansions to Support Regional Growth Communications Based Train Control Second Avenue Subway Next Phase Penn Station Access Jamaica Capacity Improvements #7 Fleet Expansion Capacity Planning Studies Sustainability Investments Program Project Listings (blue pages) - 149 - (not paginated; follows order above, beginning with blue pages for MTA NYC Transit and ending with blue pages for MTA Capital Construction Company) MTA Bridges and Tunnels 2008-2013 Capital Program - B-1 - Overview Program Plan Program Project Listings - B-25 - 2005-2009 Capital Program THE 2008-2013 CAPITAL PROGRAM: Building for the Future on a Firm Foundation In the early 1960’s, the New York Metropolitan Region’s mass transportation network faced financial collapse and a crisis of capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Communities in the Bronx: Melrose
    Morrisania Air Rights Housing Development 104 EXISTING STATIONS: Melrose SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES IN THE BRONX 105 EXISITING STATIONS MELROSE 104 EXISTING STATIONS: Melrose SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES IN THE BRONX 105 MELROSE FILLING IN THE GAPS INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION SYNOPSIS HISTORY The Melrose Metro-North Station is located along East 162nd Street between Park and Courtlandt Av- The history of the Melrose area is particularly im- enues at the edge of the Morrisania, Melrose and portant not only because it is representative of the Concourse Village neighborhoods of the Bronx. It is story of the South Bronx, but because it shaped the located approximately midway on the 161st /163rd physical form and features which are Melrose today. Street corridor spanning from Jerome Avenue on the The area surrounding the Melrose station was orig- west and Westchester Avenue on the east. This cor- inally part of the vast Morris family estate. In the ridor was identified in PlaNYC as one of the Bronx’s mid-nineteenth century, the family granted railroad three primary business districts, and contains many access through the estate to the New York and Har- regional attractions and civic amenities including lem Rail Road (the predecessor to the Harlem Line). Yankee Stadium, the Bronx County Courthouse, and In the 1870s, this part of the Bronx was annexed into the Bronx Hall of Justice. A large portion of the sta- New York City, and the Third Avenue Elevated was tion area is located within the Melrose Commons soon extended to the area. Elevated and subway Urban Renewal Area, and has seen tremendous mass transit prompted large population growth in growth and reinvestment in the past decades, with the neighborhood, and soon 5-6 story tenements Courtlandt Corners, Boricua College, Boricua Village replaced one- and two-family homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fordham Plaza Conceptual Master Plan
    Fordham Plaza Conceptual Master Plan New York City Economic Development Corporation Summer 2010 New York City Department of Transportation Summer 2010 Prepared for New York City Economic Development Corporation with New York City Department of Transportation Prepared by WXY Architecture and Urban Design Contributing Consultants Sam Schwartz Engineering, PLLC Economics Research Associates MG McLaren Engineering, P.C. Leni Schwendinger Light Projects VJ Associates Inc. of Suffolk This report was made possible through New York City Industrial Development Agency Printed on ENVIRONMENT® Papers: Forest Stewardship Council(FSC) certified, made Carbon Neutral Plus, 30% post consumer recycled fibers, and Green Seal™ Certified. Fordham Plaza Conceptual Master Plan Table of Contents Foreword 5 Introduction 6 1: A Safe, Efficient Multi-Modal Transit Hub 12 2: Extending the Vitality of Fordham Road 16 3: A Reason to Come & A Reason to Stay 20 4: A Model for Sustainability & Quality Design 24 5: Making It Happen 28 Acknowledgments 31 Stamford White Plains 25 minutes 45 minutes Fordham Plaza 17 minutes Grand Central Terminal Foreword Dear Friend, On behalf of the many stakeholders who helped shape the proposal, it is with great pleasure that we introduce the conceptual design for re-making Fordham Plaza into a vibrant, pedestrian-friendly public space and world- class intermodal transit hub. Over the course of the last year, our agencies have worked closely with Community Boards 6 and 7, local elected offi cials, surrounding businesses and property owners, New York City Transit, Metro-North Railroad, local institutions and residents to generate a concept for the Plaza and adjacent streets that will create an iconic public space in the Bronx, while easing traffi c congestion, supporting transit use and fostering neighborhood economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Day at the Zoo Is Sure to Be One of the Most Memorable Ever— Seeing Creatures Great and Small from All Over the World
    Let the adventure begin! Your day at the Zoo is sure to be one of the most memorable ever— seeing creatures great and small from all over the world. IMPORTANT: RAIL TICKETS ARE VALID FOR OFF-PEAK TRAVEL UP TO 60 DAYS FROM DATE OF PURCHASE When you purchase your package you will receive two tickets: a round-trip rail ticket and a special event ticket. If you purchased the general admission package your ticket will say “BXZOO” (exchanged at the Zoo for a general admission ticket which includes entrance to the zoo and the free exhibits, does not include admission to the monorail, zoo shuttle, children’s zoo, the bug carousel, Congo Gorilla Forest or the butterfly garden). If you purchased the total experience package your ticket will say “ZOOTOTAL” (which includes general zoo admission plus entrance to all paid attractions - excluding Camel ride). The Zoo is open daily (closed on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year’s Day). During winter hours, November through April, the Zoo is open 10 AM to 4:30 PM. To get to the Bronx Zoo, take Metro-North’s Harlem Line to Fordham Station. Give the conductor your rail ticket to punch and give back to you. Make sure to hold on to your rail ticket for your return trip home. When you get to Fordham Station, go up the stairs and through the station building. Exit the station and cross Fordham Road. Take the BX9 bus (located directly across from Fordham Station) to the Zoo entrance on Southern Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Access and Parking for Subway & Commuter Rail Users (Full)
    NYC Dept City Planning bike ride Transportation Division Bicycle Access and Parking +for Subway and Commuter Rail Users Fall 2009 Bicycle Access and Parking for Subway & Commuter Rail Users Project Identification Number (PIN): PTCP08D00.G10 The preparation of this report was financed in part through funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the view of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Federal Highway Administration of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. NYC Department of City Planning, Transportation Division Bicycle Access and Parking for Subway & Commuter Rail Users Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Bicycle Parking Possibilities in NYC 57 Bicycle Cages Introduction 7 Biceberg Bigloo Existing Conditions 8 Current Bicycle Parking Conditions Case Studies 61 Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bicycle Parking Policies Fordham - Metro North, The Bronx New York City Transit Grant City - Staten Island Rail Road, Staten Island Metro North Graham Avenue - L, Brooklyn Long Island Rail Road 23rd Street - F,V, Manhattan Bicycle Parking Concerns for MTA Customers DeKalb Avenue - B,Q,R,M, Brooklyn New York City Department
    [Show full text]
  • April 2018 Amendment CPRB
    SubmittedInterior_April2018_CapProg_Ex SummFEB_2018 4/23/18 12:16 PM Page 1 MTA Capital Program 2015–2019 Renew. Enhance. Expand. CAPITAL PROGRAM Amendment No. 3 mta.info/capital As Submitted to the Capital Program Review Board April 2018 1 18 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Overview……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Program Evolution and Proposed Changes ……………………..………………………………………………..………..…………….… 24 Investment Summary……………………………………………………………………..………..……………………………….………………… 25 Program Funding……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…………..…… 26 MTA Core……………………………………….……………………………………………….……………………………………………... 29 MTA New York City Transit……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 29 MTA Long Island Rail Road………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49 MTA Metro-North Railroad…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 63 MTA Bus Company……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 75 MTA Interagency…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 79 MTA Network Expansion……………………………………………………………….………………………..……………………….. 85 MTA Bridges and Tunnels……………………………………………………….………………………………………………...…….. 97 Project Listings………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………...……… 107 MTA New York City Transit…………………....…………………………………….……………………………………………………………………….. 111 MTA Long Island Rail Road……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………… 135 MTA Metro-North Railroad……………………………………………………………………………………………..……..….….….….….…… 143 MTA Bus Company…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….….….
    [Show full text]
  • ** New York State Department of Transportation
    ** NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ** Friday, August 26, 2011 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) on Draft Program Page 1 of 85 for MHSTCC 4-YEAR PROGRAM (FFY) AGENCY PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL Starting October 01, 2010 PIN FUND SOURCES FFY 4-YEAR PHASE PROGRAM FFY FFY FFY FFY in millions of dollars 2011 2012 2013 2014 AQ CODE COUNTY TOTAL PROJECT COST NYSDOT BEAR MOUNTAIN PARKWAY RECONSTRUCTION: RTES 6/9/202 - RTES 35/202; NFA 2013 2.000 PRELDES 2.000 TOWN OF CORTLANDT & CITY OF PEEKSKILL. NFA 2013 0.040 ROWINCD 0.040 800400 NFA 2014 1.000 DETLDES 1.000 NFA 2014 0.500 ROWACQU 0.500 AQC:A10P WESTCHESTER TPC : $32-$50 M TOTAL 4YR COST : 3.540 0.000 0.000 2.040 1.500 NYSDOT INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION: THIS PROJECT INVOLVES THE NFA 2011 0.800 DETLDES 0.800 RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BEAR MOUNTAIN STATE PARKWAY NFA 2011 0.500 ROWACQU 0.500 800402 INTERCHANGE WITH US ROUTE 6 IN THE TOWN OF CORTLANDT IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY. BIN 1003420. AQC:D3P WESTCHESTER TPC : $26-$40 M TOTAL 4YR COST : 1.300 1.300 0.000 0.000 0.000 LOCAL ROUTE 9 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, PHILIPSBURG MANOR: FROM NEW STP FLEX 2014 0.019 CONINSP 0.019 BROADWAY - POCANTICO STREET. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO NFA 2014 0.008 CONINSP 0.008 801051 PREVENT SILTATION OF MILL PONDS @ HISTORIC SITE; REQUIREMENT FOR STP FLEX 2014 0.086 CONST 0.086 FHWA PARTICIPATION IN TEP PROJECT AT MANOR. MP. 9-87032 8.00-8.16 NFA 2014 0.023 CONST 0.023 AQC:A2P WESTCHESTER TPC : < $0.75 M TOTAL 4YR COST : 0.136 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.136 NYSDOT RENOVATE STATE ROUTE 9 IN PHILLIPSTOWN-ROUTE 9 PAVEMENT HPP 2011 0.394 CONINSP 0.394 RESURFACING: WESTCHESTER COUNTY TO ROUTE 301.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Trips, Excursions, Special Journeys, Outings, Tours, and Milestones In, To, from Or Through New Jersey
    TRANSPORTATION TRIPS, EXCURSIONS, SPECIAL JOURNEYS, OUTINGS, TOURS, AND MILESTONES IN, TO, FROM OR THROUGH NEW JERSEY Bill McKelvey, Editor, Updated to Mon., Mar. 8, 2021 INTRODUCTION This is a reference work which we hope will be useful to historians and researchers. For those researchers wanting to do a deeper dive into the history of a particular event or series of events, copious resources are given for most of the fantrips, excursions, special moves, etc. in this compilation. You may find it much easier to search for the RR, event, city, etc. you are interested in than to read the entire document. We also think it will provide interesting, educational, and sometimes entertaining reading. Perhaps it will give ideas to future fantrip or excursion leaders for trips which may still be possible. In any such work like this there is always the question of what to include or exclude or where to draw the line. Our first thought was to limit this work to railfan excursions, but that soon got broadened to include rail specials for the general public and officials, special moves, trolley trips, bus outings, waterway and canal journeys, etc. The focus has been on such trips which operated within NJ; from NJ; into NJ from other states; or, passed through NJ. We have excluded regularly scheduled tourist type rides, automobile journeys, air trips, amusement park rides, etc. NOTE: Since many of the following items were taken from promotional literature we can not guarantee that each and every trip was actually operated. Early on the railways explored and promoted special journeys for the public as a way to improve their bottom line.
    [Show full text]