Traces of Cynic Monotheism in the Early Roman Empire*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Traces of Cynic Monotheism in the Early Roman Empire* ACTA CIASSICA LI (2008) 1-20 ISSN 0065-1141 ARTICLES • ARTIKELS TRACES OF CYNIC MONOTHEISM IN THE EARLY ROMAN EMPIRE* P.R. Bosman Univel sity of South Africa ABSTRACT The ancient Cynics rejected traditional religion, themselves on first appearances endorsing either atheism or agnosticism. But their criticism may also have stemmed from a radical monotheism as voiced by Antisthenes. After briefly discussing imperial Cynics and their views on religion, the article argues that the 4th letter of Pseudo-Heraclitus and the Geneva Papyrus inv. 271, Cynic texts from the Early Empire, are not contrary to the essentials of the philosophy and may represent late Hellenistic forms of the Antisthenic tradition in portraying Cynic-type sages mediating between humankind and the God of nature. Introduction Cynic philosophy's roots go back to the 4th century BC, but it experienced a revival approximately simultaneous with the dramatic rise of Christianity. The two movements had much in common, not least their shared criticism of traditional Greco-Roman religion. 1 Two fundamental forces driving early Christian rejection of popular religion were belief in the one God of Judaism and a close association of his will with the rules for righteous living. It may be asked whether anything similar can be found in the Cynicism of that era. Some sources indeed suggest that the Cynics - traditionally focussing exclusively on ethics - were prepared to link their way of life to belief in a single God who provides or communicates the principles of correct conduct to the Cynic sage.2 * I wish to thank the referees of Acta Classica for valuable comments and corrections to this text. 1 Moles 2006 provides a brief survey of the main issues and of New Testament scholarship; Downing 1988, 1992 and 1993:281-83 in particular, energetically advo­ cated the case for similarities between Cynicism and early Christianity. 2 Pace Frede 1999:42: 'There is little of substance to say about the Cynics, except 1 Cynicism gradually gained prominence as popular philosophy during the Roman Empire.3 By late antiquity, some Christian authors considered the Cynics to be their closest rivals from among the philosophical schools.4 If the claim may be accepted that monotheism was a prerequisite for the success of early Christianity,s one may suspect that a contemporary move­ ment with popular appeal would also have harboured thoughts on a topic of such crucial importance. This suspicion is strengthened by the Antisthenic roots of Cynicism.6 Antisthenes, the late 5th/ early 4th century Socratic, is credited with probably the least ambiguous formulation of monotheism in all antiquity, expressed initerms of the sophistic nomos-pl?Jsis antithesis. As reported by Philodemus, Antisthenes claimed in his Pl?Jsics that there are many gods 'according to custom' (KaTa v6µov), but only one 'according to nature' (rnTa cpuow).7 Unfortunately, evidence from Cynic literature of the Roman era is meagre and ambiguous, as reflected in the absence of an opinio comm11nis on the issue of Cynic religion.a However, indications exist of some Cynics at least who shared with the majority of ancient philosophers a belief in one God gover­ ning the universe.9 Before we attempt to establish the outlines of such a belief and even of a rudimentary theology, the Cynicism of the first centu­ ries of our era and their attitude towards religion must be briefly considered. perhaps that they apparently tended to reject traditional religion.' 3 Cf. Branham & Goulet-Caze 1996:5: 'the pre-eminent popular philosophy of the Roman empire.' 4 Cf. Rahn 1991:244-48; Dorival 1993:431-42. 5 Athanassiadi & Frede 1999:20. 6 Antisthenes's relationship to Cynicism is disputed, but prominent scholars in the field accept at least strong influence; cf. Guthrie 1969:306-08; Kindstrand 197 6:59; Prince 2006. On how the issue of Antisthenic antecedence impacts on the philo­ sophy's profile, cf. Desmond 2006:6-7. 7 P. Herc. 1428 fr. 21 Gomperz 1866:72 = fr.39A Decleva Caizzi; Philod. De piet. 19.536-41 refers to the same idea; cf. Obbink 1996:142-43; 359-61; also Cic. De nat. deo1: 1.32: Atque etiam Antisthenes in eo libro qui Pf?ysictts inscribit11r popularis deos 11111/tos natttralem tlflttm esse dicens to/lit vim et natttram deon1111; discussion in Brancacci 1985. On the issue of defining monotheism in antiquity, see Athanassiadi & Frede 1999:2-20; West 1999. 8 Goulet-Caze 1996:47, 79-80 mentions the following views of modern scholars: 'Enlightenment' (Zeller), 'the purest deist sect' (Bernays), 'colourless or strict mono­ theism' (Gomperz, Malherbe) and 'pantheism' (Guthrie), herself preferring to l~bel them agnostics; cf. also Malherbe 1978:47. 9 Frede 1999:56. 2 ·" ,-f"• Cynics of the early Roman Empire Following two low-keyed centuries, Cynicism became something of a philosophical mass movement during the early imperial period. IO By the 2nd century AD, Cynics were a common sight in imperial centres, as Dio and Lucian observe: Twv 8E KvvLKwv AEYDµEvwv fon µEv Ev Tfj TTOAEL TTAf\Sos ouK 6A.[ yov ... ouToL BE: Ev TE TpL68oLs Kal. CJTEvwTTo'Ls Kal. TTuA.waLv lEpwv ayE[pOUCJL KUL UTTUTWCJL TTm8cipw KUL vmhas KUL TOLOUTOV oxA.ov ... There is no small mob of the so-called Cynics in the city (Alexandria) ... these gather at cross-roads and alleyways and temple-gates, and they deceive boys and sailors and such crowds ... 11 TOL yapouv EµTTETTATJCJTm TTdaa TTOALS Tfis TOLUUTTJS pq.8LOupy(as, Kal. µciA.wTa Twv LlLDyEVTJ 1eal. 'Avna8EVT] 1eal. KpciTT]Ta ETTL ypacpoµ€vwv Kal imo Tc)> 1euvl. TaTToµ€vwv ... For this reason every city is filled with such knavery, particularly with those who enlist with Diogenes, Antisthenes, and Crates and are posted under the dog.12 Taking into account that both these authors had Cynic sympathies, the passages reveal an apparent schism between the cultured or educated Cynics on the one hand, and the uneducated, charlatan Cynics on the other. Our sources are virtually all from the literate side of the controversy and strongly biased against the seemingly huge but voiceless group who, they claim, took to the externals of the philosophy without comprehending its intellectual core: these Cynics sported the costume, but degraded it with coarse, abusive behaviour and lack of integrity. The same authors (and others such as Seneca, Epictetus and Julian) also eulogise the early Cynics and those contemporaries they believe to be the true heirs of Diogenes, such as 10 Branham & Goulet-Caze 1996:16. The standard treatment of the era is Goulet­ Caze 1990; more recently, Trapp 2007. Billerbeck 1991a:147-48 agrees with scholars such as Zeller and Bernays that Cynicism had died out by the 2nd century BC, a view contested by others; cf. Dudley 2003:117-24; Moles 1983:122; Branham & Goulet­ Caze 1996:12 n. 34. The phenomenon is commonly regarded as a reaction against the excessive wealth and luxury of the era. The cultured version - using Cynic TTappria[a - played a significant part in the so-called philosophical resistance against Nero, Vespasian and Domitian; cf. Billerbeck (above) 151. 11 Dio Chrys. 01: 32.9. 12 Lucian, F11g. 16. 3 .,. Demetrius and Demonax. In the latter depictions, the famous Cynic ci.val8ELa and other offensive aspects of the philosophy are deliberately downplayed for the purpose of social acceptance.13 It seems unlikely, however, that our literary sources present us with a true picture. The Cynicism of the age should rather be viewed in terms of a con­ tinuum, including various degrees of education and extremism. The boun­ daries of the movement are ill-defined, often merging into other forms of popular philosophy. Their closest ties were with the Stoics, as is already clear from Cicero.14 First-century Stoic authors such as Seneca and Epictetus express genuine tJ.dmiration for Cynic principles and figures; both their teachers (Attalus and Musonius Rufus) represented an ascetic form of Stoicism that could easily be mistaken for Cynicism. It appears, however, that th~ Cynics resisted late Stoic appropriation and felt in some respects closer to other schools of thought. Some scholars are of the opinion that by the second-century Cynics were probably closest to Epicureanism in respect of ascetic behaviour and rationalism, while others speculate that a figure like Peregrinus bears resemblance to neo-Pythagorean mysticism.is In any event, the Cynic profile was well known in the philosophical and social landscape of the era; outwardly, the Cynic sage even embodied the ideal of the true philosopher.16 In summary, the Cynics of the imperial age emerge from the evidence as a non-consolidated movement, sometimes admired - even among the cultured - for their uncompromising stance, their wit, lively style and literary inventiveness, and at other times despised - especially when represented by the less educated - for their shameless behaviour, intemperate demeanour and paucity of intellect. While a good measure of eclecticism may be presumed, the Cynics nonetheless wished to remain distinct from the other schools by reason of their strict adherence to simplicity and the dictates of nature, and to an outward style of radical rrappT]a(a, on occasion leading to a provocative subversion of social conventions. 13Billerbeck1991a. 14 Cic. Off. 1.128; cf. Billerbeck 1991a:148-49. 15 Cf. Dill 1906:355; Hornsby 1991:168. That Lucian's Cynic and Epicurean characters, such as Cyniscus in the Zeus Conj and Damis in the Zeus Trag. use the same arguments may be indicative of perceived closeness, although perhaps mainly in opposition to Stoic views on fate and religion. 16 Indicating, perhaps, that such Cynic-type figures were free to choose from the available philosophical repertoire supposedly compatible with Cynic austerity and criticism of societal norms.
Recommended publications
  • Simon the Shoemaker
    SIMON THE SHOEMAKER John Sellars 1399 3RD AVENUE -MANHATTAN- SIMON SHOE REPAIR -1- The name “Simon the Shoemaker” is not one im- mediately familiar to specialists in ancient philoso- 1 phy, let alone to students of philosophy in general. This may well be due, in part, to the tendency of many scholars both past and present to deny his historical reality altogether. Ancient sources refer to a Simon who, it is said, was an associate of Socrates and who ran a shoe shop on the edge of the Athenian agora where Socrates used to come to engage in philosophical discussions with Simon while he worked.2 However, the fact that neither Plato nor Xenophon mentions Simon has often been cited as an argument against his very existence. Moreover, it is reported that the Socratic philosopher Phaedo wrote a dialogue entitled Simon, and thus it has been sug- gested that the later “Simon legend” derived ultimately from a literary character created by Phaedo.3 The situation has somewhat changed since the discovery of the remains of a shop near the Tholos on the southwestern edge of the agora, the floor scattered with hobnails, containing a base from a pot with the word “Simon’s” inscribed upon it.4 Ar- chaeologists commenting upon this discovery have been keen to identify its owner with the Simon mentioned in the literary sources as a companion of Socrates, but scholars primarily concerned with ancient philosophy have tended to remain doubtful.5 Simon’s reputation relies principally upon the claim made by Diogenes Laertius that Simon was the first to write “Socratic dialogues.”6 Diogenes reports that these were also known as “shoemaker’s dialogues” or simply “shoemaker’s.” These, Diogenes says, were notes of actual conversations that Simon had had with Socrates rather than literary compositions.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Cynicism
    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
    [Show full text]
  • The Recollections of Encolpius
    The Recollections of Encolpius ANCIENT NARRATIVE Supplementum 2 Editorial Board Maaike Zimmerman, University of Groningen Gareth Schmeling, University of Florida, Gainesville Heinz Hofmann, Universität Tübingen Stephen Harrison, Corpus Christi College, Oxford Costas Panayotakis (review editor), University of Glasgow Advisory Board Jean Alvares, Montclair State University Alain Billault, Université Jean Moulin, Lyon III Ewen Bowie, Corpus Christi College, Oxford Jan Bremmer, University of Groningen Ken Dowden, University of Birmingham Ben Hijmans, Emeritus of Classics, University of Groningen Ronald Hock, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Niklas Holzberg, Universität München Irene de Jong, University of Amsterdam Bernhard Kytzler, University of Natal, Durban John Morgan, University of Wales, Swansea Ruurd Nauta, University of Groningen Rudi van der Paardt, University of Leiden Costas Panayotakis, University of Glasgow Stelios Panayotakis, University of Groningen Judith Perkins, Saint Joseph College, West Hartford Bryan Reardon, Professor Emeritus of Classics, University of California, Irvine James Tatum, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire Alfons Wouters, University of Leuven Subscriptions Barkhuis Publishing Zuurstukken 37 9761 KP Eelde the Netherlands Tel. +31 50 3080936 Fax +31 50 3080934 [email protected] www.ancientnarrative.com The Recollections of Encolpius The Satyrica of Petronius as Milesian Fiction Gottskálk Jensson BARKHUIS PUBLISHING & GRONINGEN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY GRONINGEN 2004 Bókin er tileinkuð
    [Show full text]
  • The Melammu Project
    THE MELAMMU PROJECT http://www.aakkl.helsinki.fi/melammu/ “The Naked Ascetics of India and Other Eastern Religions in the Greek and Roman Sources of the Late Classical Antiquity” KLAUS KARTTUNEN Published in Melammu Symposia 3: A. Panaino and G. Pettinato (eds.), Ideologies as Intercultural Phenomena. Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium of the Assyrian and Babylonian Intellectual Heritage Project. Held in Chicago, USA, October 27-31, 2000 (Milan: Università di Bologna & IsIao 2002), pp. 135-42. Publisher: http://www.mimesisedizioni.it/ This article was downloaded from the website of the Melammu Project: http://www.aakkl.helsinki.fi/melammu/ The Melammu Project investigates the continuity, transformation and diffusion of Mesopotamian culture throughout the ancient world. A central objective of the project is to create an electronic database collecting the relevant textual, art-historical, archaeological, ethnographic and linguistic evidence, which is available on the website, alongside bibliographies of relevant themes. In addition, the project organizes symposia focusing on different aspects of cultural continuity and evolution in the ancient world. The Digital Library available at the website of the Melammu Project contains articles from the Melammu Symposia volumes, as well as related essays. All downloads at this website are freely available for personal, non-commercial use. Commercial use is strictly prohibited. For inquiries, please contact [email protected]. KARTTUNEN T HE NAKED ASCETICS OF INDIA KLAUS KARTTUNEN Helsinki The Naked Ascetics of India and Other Eastern Religions in the Greek and Roman Sources of the Late Classical Antiquity * peculiar outcome of Alexander’s the Seleucid envoy to the Indian Maurya Indian campaigns was the per- empire, gave his own view of the Gym- Asistent fame of India as the land nosophistai and described several kinds of wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bare Necessities: Ascetic Indian Sages in Philostratus' 'Life of Apollonius'
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2011 The Bare Necessities: Ascetic Indian Sages in Philostratus' 'Life of Apollonius' Samuel McVane College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation McVane, Samuel, "The Bare Necessities: Ascetic Indian Sages in Philostratus' 'Life of Apollonius'" (2011). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 362. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/362 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Introduction One might not think that much direct contact occurred between the cultures of ancient Greece and Rome and ancient India. The civilizations lay thousands of miles apart, a vast distance for men who traveled by foot or horse. But in fact, we have much evidence, both material and literary, for rather extensive contact – economic, military, and cultural – between the ancient East and West. One of the most interesting interactions, in my opinion, was the intellectual exchange between the West and ancient Indian philosophers, sages, and religious thinkers. Fortunately, we have a great body of extant ancient Western literature – primarily in Greek – that provide numerous accounts and descriptions, historic, pseudo- historic, and fictional, of Indian wise men and their interactions with the West. This body of literature particularly focuses on portrayals of Indian ascetics who lived a very frugal lifestyle, scorning most material needs, in the pursuit of knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Cynicism As a Way of Life: from the Classical Cynic to a New Cynicism
    Akropolis 1 (2017) 33–54 Dennis Schutijser* Cynicism as a way of life: From the Classical Cynic to a New Cynicism Introduction Both within and outside the world of academic philosophy, art of living has been increasingly in the spotlight. Objectives such as success, pleasure and happi- ness are expressly validated in contemporary society, but more philosophically val- id objectives such as cultivation of the soul also receive ample attention. On the other side, within academic philosophy, the question for the art of living has also been receiving increasing attention.1 This revival could arguably be led back to Mi- chel Foucault’s genealogical return to antiquity in the second and third parts of his History of Sexuality, in turn undoubtedly influenced by the works of Pierre Hadot. Especially classical philosophy has proven a rich source of investigation and inspi- ration for a philosophy of the art of living. Many currents in ancient philosophy ac- tually proposed different ways of living, based on different values and articulated in different practices.2 One of the central currents throughout a large part of antiquity was Cyn- icism. This school is accompanied with a number of methodological difficulties. Not least of all, today’s connotation of the name Cynicism is radically different from its classical origins. Today, being a cynic is associated with a depreciative at- titude, intended to insult and offend, rather than being concerned with any phil- osophical foundation. A further complication is that little is known directly of classical Cynicism, and what we do know often comes from anecdotes and stories written down by posterity, and not from actual first hand sources of substantial profundity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invisibility of Juvenal James Uden Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Th
    The Invisibility of Juvenal James Uden Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 2011 James Uden All rights reserved. ABSTRACT The Invisibility of Juvenal James Uden This dissertation offers a reading of Juvenal’s Satires. It maintains that Juvenal consciously frustrates readers’ attempts to identify his poetic voice with a single unitary character or persona. At the same time, it argues that Juvenal’s poems are influenced in both form and theme by cultural trends in the early second century. The arguments staged in these poems constitute a critique of aspects of Roman intellectual culture in the reigns of Trajan and Hadrian. Contents Preface 1. Provoking the Charge: Epic Poet and Reticent Informer in Satire One The Recitation Hall (Part One) The Paradox of Contemporary Epic The Satirist as Delator The Crisis of Criticism Satiric Voices in Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus The Recitation Hall (Part Two) 2. The Invisibility of Juvenal ‘Atopic Topology’: The Thirteenth Oration of Dio Chrysostom Juvenal’s Second Satire: Strategies for Speech and Disguise Secrecy and Violence in Satire Nine 3. Satire Four: Playing the Panegyrist The Art of Exaggeration The Emperor over Nature Natural Reversal and Fish Savagery The Perils of Panegyrical Speech i 4. Cynic Philosophy and Ethical Education in Satires Ten and Fourteen Debasing the Coinage The Laugh of Democritus and the Cynic Ideal Satire Fourteen: The Domestication of Ethical Teaching 5. Satire Twelve: Repetition and Sacrifice in Hadrianic Rome Horatian Ritual and the “New Augustus” Substitution and Sacrifice: Animals and Humans in Satire Twelve The Gods and their Captatores Reading across Books: Atheism and Superstition in Satire Thirteen Appendix: Martial 12.18 and the Dating of Juvenal’s First Book ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks must go first to Gareth Williams, friend and mentor for the past half-decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Philo on Jewish Identity and Culture
    Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum Edited by Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer 86 Maren R. Niehoff Philo on Jewish Identity and Culture Mohr Siebeck Maren R. Niehoff, born 1963; studied Jewish Studies, Literature and Philosophy in Berlin, Jeru- salem and Oxford; 1989-91 Junior Fellow at the Society of Fellows at Harvard University; since 1991 Lecturer in the Department of Jewish Thought at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. CIP-Titelaufnahme der Deutschen Bibliothek Niehoff, Maren: Philo an Jewish identity and culture / Maren R. Niehoff. - 1. Aufl., - Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2001 (Texts and studies in ancient Judaism ; 86) ISBN 3-16-147611-5 © 2001 by J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), P.O.Box 2040, D-72010 Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to repro- ductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Martin Fischer in Tübingen, printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Heinr. Koch in Tübingen. Printed in Germany ISSN 0340-9570 For Udi, Maya and Ayana Acknowledgements This book had its beginning in the winter of 1995 when Professor Martin Hengel suggested that I contribute a volume to the series "Text and Studies in Ancient Judaism". It took some time until the theme of the present book took shape and work on the individual chapters could begin. Throughout this proc- ess, both editors of the series, Peter Schäfer and Martin Hengel, supported and encouraged me.
    [Show full text]
  • Plutarch the Multiculturalist: Is West Always Best? by Christopher Pelling University of Oxford [email protected]
    Plutarch the Multiculturalist: Is West always Best? by Christopher Pelling University of Oxford [email protected] Abstract Is Plutarch a multiculturalist, recognising the value of non-Greek cultures along with Greek? Does he even go as far as Antiphon in the fifth century and deny any firm dividing line between barbarian and Greek? There are some traces of this, particularly an awareness that all may recognise the same gods; the Romans in particular may share some underlying traits with the Greeks while also showing differences. But Alexander the Great, even if the On the Virtue or Fortune of Alexander essays present him as unifying East and West, does so by imposing Greek values; the Life shows little interest in his learning anything from eastern values and philosophy. The alien culture to inspire most respect is that of Egypt, and the Isis and Osiris in particular accepts that there is much wisdom that Greeks share with Egyptians. Key-Words: Multiculturalism, Polarities, Racism, Alexander, Gymnoso- phists, Egypt, Syncretism. lutarch, we feel, is one of life in all its manifestations, yet of us. He would be deliberately avoiding the unseemly and thoroughly at home trying to present the best side of his subjects’2: one can just see him in the in a convivial con fe ­ bar late at night, surrounded by acolytes P1 rence setting , this ‘un der stand ing and of a much younger generation, gently intellectually curious person, someone pleased by our interest and admiration, who is serious but not stuffy, aware occasionally putting us right on so­ 1 As so many of us felt ourselves at home amid the breathtaking scenery and warm hospitality of Banff.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading 1 Corinthians with the Augustan Marriage Laws
    Paul on Marriage and Singleness: Reading 1 Corinthians with the Augustan Marriage Laws by David Alan Reed A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Theology of the University of St. Michael’s College and the Biblical Department of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael’s College © David Alan Reed 2013 Paul on Marriage and Singleness: Reading 1 Corinthians 7 with the Augustan Marriage Laws David Wheeler-Reed Doctor of Philosophy in Theology University of St. Michael’s College 2013 Abstract This thesis examines what happens if Paul’s directives to married and single persons in 1 Corinthians 7 are read in light of Corinth’s Roman cultural context. It seeks to make analogical comparisons between Paul’s directives in 1 Corinthians 7 and the Augustan Marriage Laws known as the Lex Iulia and Lex Papipa Poppaea. When Paul’s directives are read with the Augustan marriage laws, a very complex picture of Paul develops. First of all, against “empire- critical” readers of Paul, the apostle is not entirely against all aspects of the Roman empire. Instead, this thesis demonstrates that as a colonized individual himself, Paul was a “hybrid” figure, who simultaneously borrowed from and fought against many of the ideas of Roman imperialism. Second, this work shows that when Paul disagreed with the Augustan marriage legislation, he did so mainly with respect to what it had to say about widows. In fact, Paul’s directives to widows are very similar to the thoughts of many other Roman moralists in the first- century CE.
    [Show full text]
  • Selfdefinition Among the Cynics
    From: Paul and the Popular Philosophers ​ Self­Definition among the Cynics Abraham Malherbe The Cynics and the Cynicism of the first century A.D. are known to us for the most part through Stoic interpreters, and the temptation is great, on the basis of Seneca's account of Demetrius, Musonius Rufus, Epictetus, and Dio Chrysostom, to draw a picture of Cynicism which obscures the differences between Stoicism and Cynicism and among the Cynics themselves. In the second century, the diversity among the Cynics emerges more clearly as such personalities as Oenomaus of Gadara, Demonax, and Peregrinus Proteus appear on the scene. Unfortunately, only fragments of Oenomaus's writings have been preserved, and only a few comments, mostly negative, are made about him by Julian, and we are largely but not wholly dependent on Lucian's interpretations of Demonax and Peregrinus for information about them. It is therefore fortunate that in the Cynic epistles we do have primary sources for the sect in the Empire. These neglected writings are more than the school exercises they have been thought to be, and enable us to determine the points at issue among the Cynics themselves. The Definition of Cynicism Diogenes Laertius already experienced difficulty in describing common Cynic doctrine, and records that some considered it, not a philosophical school (hairesis), but a way of life (Lives of Eminent Philosophers 6.103). He seems to incline to the view that it is a philosophical school, but notes that Cynics dispensed with logic and physics, and confined themselves to ethics. Cynics have generally been perceived as having an aversion to encyclopaedic learning and placing no premium on education in the pursuit of virtue.
    [Show full text]
  • Index Locorum
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02666-7 - The Symposion in Ancient Greek Society and Thought Fiona Hobden Index More information Index locorum Achaeus 206 LP, 35 Aethon 332 LP, 31, 35 9 N, 83 346 LP, 35, 48 Adespota elegiaca 347 LP, 35 27 W, 28, 35, 57, 203 348 LP, 31 Adespota tragica 352 LP, 35 89 N, 236 366 LP, 184 Aelian 367 LP, 35 Varia historia 368 LP, 7 2.41, 98, 111 401a LP, 35 Aeneas Tacticus 401b LP, 35 16.5–6, 101 Alcman Aeschines 19 Davies, 9, 32 Against Timarchus (1) 98 Davies, 30 137, 145 Amos 139–40, 145 6.4–7, 9 On the False Embassy (2) Anacharsis 4, 138 a11a Kind, 113 22, 132, 135, 138 a23b Kind, 109 135, 138 a23d–f Kind, 109 155, 138 a26a Kind, 112 157, 134 a27a Kind, 112 158, 138 a28a Kind, 113 163, 132, 135, 138 a31a Kind, 112 Aeschines of Sphettus Epistle Alcibiades, 196 3, 113 Aeschylus 5, 114 Agamemnon 6, 114 1191–3, 192 Anacreon 1219–22, 192 356a Campbell, 45, 46, 1590–1604, 192 51, 73 Eumenides 356b Campbell, 50, 51, 57, 73 723–8, 159 358 Campbell, 54 731, 160 359 Campbell, 54 Prometheus Unbound 373 Campbell, 35–7, 53 198 N, 85, 100 374 Campbell, 39, 41 Alcaeus 378 Campbell, 54 50 LP, 35 396 Campbell, 54 70 LP, 7, 31 409 Campbell, 48 130 LP, 23 412 Campbell, 60 141 LP, 31, 142 430 Campbell, 53, 57 276 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02666-7 - The Symposion in Ancient Greek Society and Thought Fiona Hobden Index More information Index locorum 277 el.
    [Show full text]