The Eagle 1916 (Michaelmas Term)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
" --agatlnr •upporteb by -ember• of �t �obn't� fCollegr �tfnteb for �ubietlbm; onl!} Ql:ambrfbgt 1E, �obnt�on, �rlnit!! �treet '@dntcb bl! P\ttralft � «o. 1Ro!lt <!tnsttnl 'timltcn, 1916 iv CONTENTS. 'Divus' and 'Sanctus' in 1511-1516 197 The Public Orator and ' Divus' 200 Cadets in College 206 "Beats" 209 Roll of Honour 212 Obituary: Rev. Henry Whitehead Moss, M.A. 217 Obituary for 1916 224 Our Chronicle 240 THE EAGLE. The Library 248 Our War List 251 October Ter1111 1916. Cervantes 253 Hellenism in Being 265 The Commemoration Sermon 266 COLLEGIUM SANCTI JOHANNIS, Circumstance 274 not Rath Jatra 276 Collegium divi J ohannis. Captive 285 (Co11fim1ed from Vol. xxxvn., p. 332.) H. M. Gwatkin 286 Of Bernard Adams 291 (27la) THE EARLY STATUTES AND 0HDINANCES OF THE The Gillespie Band-A Retrospect 292 CoLLEGE. ' Auld Lang Syne' in Russian 298 First edition, dale Wednesday 9 April 1511. Beats. II. 299 Review 303 It gives me pleasure to be able to announce that, on Saturday the 2nd of September last, I discovered and Roll of Honour 304 identified the 1511 STATUTES of the College, which I had Obituary: been assured had never existed, or if they had, no longer Rev. Joseph Bickersteth Mayor 323 existed now. John Arnold Nicklin 329 (271b) I have to qualify this statement by saying, that the Henry Josiah Sharpe 344 whole Code of 1511 has as yet not come to light, but only twelve Canon Edward Alexander Stuart 347 vellum leaves of it. These twelve leaves, however, enable Our War List 349 me to give a fairly clear bibliographical and palaeographical Our Chronicle 351 description of the Volume of Statutes, which the first Master The Library 360 and the first three Fellows of the College of St John the Evangelist received and accepted, on Wednesday the 9th of April 1511, from Lady Margaret's Executors when they founded and established that College in the stead and on the VOL. XXXVIII. B 2 Coll. Sancti Joh. not Coll. clivi Joh. Coll. Sancti J oh. not Coll. clivi J oh. 3 site and remains of the dissolved Hospital or House of St given me proofs on tive memory, of which he had already John the Evangelist. somewhat former occasions,recalled to him at once Schiller's ",whom the poet (271c) Moreover, I have to point out that two of the appropriate poem addressed to '' Columbus despaired, twelve leaves have evidently formed part of another copy of assured that,though wit scoffed and though sailors 11 out of the same Code, as they differ from the other ten in the hand even if there were no land, yet now land would arise read writing, rubrics and form and workmanship of their coloured the deep." To apply it to the present case, for "land" initials. But they have an interest of their own which will "Statutes" and"Deed" for '1 deep." be explained below (§ 280k). (273) As '' evidence " for their non-existence, I was, of (272a) Already in October 1915, when writing my first course, referred to Baker, the "historian of the College '', notes for Th� Eagl� on the unauthorised use of the unsuitable who, on p. 80 of his History, not only ridicules the idea of a epithet divus in the name and title of the College, I had read body of Statutes having existed more ancient than that of in the Deed of Foundation of 9 April 1511, that, on the very 1516, but even tells us that before 1516 there had been no day when Lady Margaret's Executors founded the College, occasion for Statutes ; they were not wanted, as there was as the they had a body of Statutes ready for the proper government yet no College, no Scholars to be governed by them, and of their new Institution. The Executors say so in their four or five Fellows lodged abroad, and therefore did not fall Deed in clear Latin. Moreover, in the Deed they quoted under any regular discipline and (p. 70) had pensions allowed the Preamble and the first Chapter of these Statutes, adding them for their chambers. I was also referred to Mayor's o that these and the remaining things, which were written Early Statutes of St John's C llege, who never even alludes to elsewhere (alibi), they willed to be firmly observed by the Statutes �arlier than those of 1516. But the latter had evidently been precluded by other aying Master and the Fellows and Scholars of the College. occupations from p the necessary attention to the origin and history �of the (272b) The Deed and its contents, therefore, placed the Statutes which he so ably published, while Baker's :negative existence of Statutes in 1511 so much beyond the possibility about earlier Stalutes than those of is inexplicable ' for . 1516 of any reasonable doubt, that I did not hesitate to speak of 11e �p1ed the whole Deed of Foundation with his own hand this existence as an undoubted fact, and to quote from their � n one of his copy books, and says that "he knows that there Preamble and first Chapter, as quoted in the Deed, in my 1s •fereuce made to Statutes in the charter of the foundation." He also paragraphs 7c, 7d, 7e and 7/ � seems to have known that other authors before him lad alluded to Statutes more (272c) But as, in spite of the Deed and its plain language, ancient than those of 1516. It 1s, therefore, matter for amazeme·nt that the real I had, on inquiry, been assured that there were no Statutes ••state of things escaped him of 15111 and never had been, I mentioned them in paragraph (274) The only question 8/ as one of the things for which a search had to be made. !� s=��c to me was when how and where f these missing i For, with the Deed of Foundation before me, I felt sure that �� Statutes. A pr vate person ' � like } avmg no unrestricted Statutes had existed in 15111 and would still be hidden access to th e unarrange d Colleg e ...._ somewhere ..,cuments, could not among the College documents. begin this search . B t ould deal . u as I with the numerous 1. I . ust oncal items of (272d) When told Mr CoxI our Senior Fellow I a day or on "divus" 111 my article �1 1ronolog1cal . ord two after I had discovered er. and 11ad to begin the Statutes of 1511 ' that I had never the XII. century with the re was, I thought, had any doubt as to their having existed at the foundation o to D no immediate hurry f search for a ocu ollege, men t dated the C as the language of the Deed of Foundation on 1511 <275a) Whi the point was clear and precise, his wide reading and le working, however reten- , on the present essay, 4 Coli. Sancti Joh. not Coll. divi J oh. Col!. Sancti Jolt not Coli. divi !oh. 5 which was begun in May 1915, I was able to collect and Bishop of Rochester's that, "on that day, in the Chapelof the print further evidence as to the existence of 1511 Statutes , s Exe�utors palace, a procuratorialletter from Lady Margaret from the following authentic and authoritative official docu notary pt�?hc and was read (in the presence of John Beyre, a ments, ranging from 10 March 1509 to 9 ApriJ 1511, and all �� F 1sher to Fisher's Registrary) empowering Bish Bishop . dealing with, or authorizing, the conversion of the Old Vlr�ue of impose Statutes upon the College," and that, m Hospital of St J olm into a secular College of the same name: 1516 dehvered. this letter Bishop Fisher had on [29th] July (1 and 2) Articles of Agreement of 10 and 14 March 1509 between : the fell�ws such Statutes to Alen Percy [second] mast r and Lady Margaret and the then Bishop of Ely , (3) the signed Bill of e. , of college, binding them by oath to the1r observanc between 21 April and 29 June 1509, (4) the Privy Seal of 25 July 1509, the (5) the Royal Licence of King Henry VIII., dated 7 August 1509, for (276b) To this document Prof. Mayor, on the same page dissolving the Hospital of St John and establishing a new College in its 395, added the following note stead , (6) Indenture dated 7 March 1510 between the Bishop of Ely and read as a whole by This instrument, which has probably not been Lady Margaret's Executors. (7) Indenture in English dated 12 December u of t�e [ 151�] Statutes, any one during the last two centuries, fixes the date 1510, between the Executors of Lady Margaret and the Bishop of Ely , conjecture. The former porbon of 1t (down to (8) which Baker assigned by Deed of the Bishop of Ely granting the site &c. of St John's Hospital printed from "asseruit" p. 396, Ji. 5) was unknown to Baker it is here to Lady Margaret's Executors for converting it into a College. La�tly (9) the sitzgle remaitring sheet of another copy of the code of 1516* preserved in the Deed of the Foundation of the College, dated 9 April 1511. the College treasury the latter portion (beginning "ratificavit" ) is written page which contains the end of Gregson's (275b) These nine documents, all written in Latin (except on the upper part of the Statute" No. 7 which is in the vernacular), made it clear that the old this Hospital of St John could hardly have been dissolved or the (276c) I had already once or twice read or perused how new College of St John founded in its stead in 1511, without public instrument and Mayor�s note to it.